Abstract
Despite significant scientific efforts in the field of water treatment, pollution of drinking water by toxic metal ions and synthetic organic compounds is becoming an increasing problem. The photocatalytic capabilities of CuInS2 nanoparticles were examined in this study for both the degradation of chloramphenicol (CAP) and the reduction of Cr(VI). CuInS2 nanoparticles were produced using a straightforward solvothermal approach and subsequently characterized by many analysis techniques. Simultaneous photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation by the CuInS2 nanoparticles under visible-light demonstrated that lower pH and sufficient dissolved oxygen favored both Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation. On the basis of active species quenching experiments, the possible photocatalytic mechanisms for Cr(VI) conversion with synchronous CAP degradation were proposed. Additionally, the CuInS2 retains a high rate of mixed pollutant removal after five runs. This work shows that organic contaminants and heavy metal ions can be treated concurrently by the visible-light-induced photocatalysis of CuInS2.
Introduction
Industries such as electroplating, mining, leather tanning and electronics manufacturing use large amounts of chromium compounds, leading to serious water pollution (; ; ). Due to its carcinogenic, teratogenic, and transportable properties, Cr(VI) poses a substantial hazard to both the environment and human health (; ; ). Furthermore, antibiotics are used widely to treat bacterial illnesses, resulting in widespread contamination of aquatic ecosystems, including surface water and groundwater (; ; ). Because the biological toxicity of such compounds endangers the aquatic organisms and human health, a growing emphasis is being placed on their efficient removal (). Chloramphenicol (CAP) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that can be used to treat a wide range of bacteria and viruses (). Ingestion of CAP-contaminated water may lead to the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and a reduction in medullary hematopoiesis function (). Given the inadequacy of conventional sewage treatment plants in eliminating CAP, the total removal of these antibiotic compounds from water is a major concern. In reality, heavy metals and organic contaminants coexist in the same environment quite regularly.
A variety of strategies for removing CAP and Cr(VI) have already been documented to date, including adsorption, advanced oxidation processes, and biological treatment. Because of its low cost, safety, and great efficiency, photocatalysis-based advanced oxidation technique has gotten a lot of interest in the field of organic wastewater purification (; ; ). Several photocatalysts have also been explored for the degradation of CAP, such as jarosite, LSCO5, and SmVO4/g-C3N4 composite (; ; ). Moreover, controlling Cr(VI) pollution through photocatalytic reduction is a viable option. A number of photocatalysts such as Fe2O3, Bi2MoO6, g-C3N4, SnS2 and their composites have been shown to be capable of reducing Cr(VI) to less harmful Cr(III) under visible-light irradiation (Zhang et al., 2016; ; ; ; ). The mechanism indicates that the conduction band and valence band of the photocatalyst play the roles of reduction and oxidation, respectively, which provides the possibility of simultaneous removal of Cr(VI) and CAP by reduction and oxidation reactions in the same photocatalytic system. Thus, the development of effective and efficient photocatalysts is required for synergistic photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and degradation of CAP.
Owing to its durability, low toxicity, appropriate band gap, and good solar energy conversion efficiency, I-III-VI ternary metal sulfide semiconductors have received a lot of research attention thus far (; Zhang et al., 2021). Copper indium sulfide (CuInS2) is a promising I-III-VI2 ternary chalcopyrite material with a wide range of advantages for photocatalytic and photovoltaic applications (; ; ). Its conduction band is made up of In 5s orbitals, and its valence band is made up of S 3p orbitals, resulting in a small band-gap (1.53 eV for the bulk CuInS2) (; ). It has been investigated as a photocatalyst for CO2 reduction (), organic pollutant degradation (; ), and nitrate ion reduction (), etc. However, it has not been applied to the field of synergistic photocatalytic elimination of Cr(VI) and organic pollutants.
Here, CuInS2 nanoparticles were prepared using a one-step hydrothermal technique, and investigated as a photocatalyst in the concurrent elimination of Cr(VI) and CAP under visible-light irradiation. Furthermore, on the grounds of different characterizations and theoretical analysis, the synergistic removal effect of pollutants and photocatalytic reaction mechanism in the Cr(VI)-CAP coexistence system were explored and discussed in detail.
Experimental
Materials
All the reagents (analytical grade) were purchased and used as received from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Throughout the study, all solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ⋅cm).
Synthesis of CuInS2
4 mmol CH3CSNH2, 2.0 mmol In(NO3)3·H2O, and 2.0 mmol Cu(NO3)3·3H2O were dissolved in 40 ml anhydrous ethanol, and stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 60 min to generate a homogenous dark brown suspension. The solution was then transferred into a 100 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 180°C for 2 h. After cooling to ambient temperature naturally, the precipitate was centrifuged, washed alternately with ethanol and water, and dried at 80°C for 24 h.
Characterization of the Synthesized CuInS2
An X-ray diffractometer (XRD, PANalytical B.V.) was used to determine the phase of the as-obtained product. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Japan Hitachi LTD. S4800) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Japanese electronics JEM-2100PLU) were used to characterize the products’ microstructure. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) was measured by pH drift method. X–ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a PHI 5000C ESCA System. Using a UV–Vis spectrometer (UV-2450, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an integrating sphere attachment and BaSO4 as a reflectance standard, UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of the dry-pressed disk sample was acquired.
Photocatalytic Tests
The photocatalytic performance of the synthesized CuInS2 was determined by monitoring the simultaneous photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and degradation of CAP in aqueous solution under visible-light illumination. The photocatalytic experimental setup (PL-02, Beijing Precise Technology Co., Ltd.) contains a Xe arc lamp (1000 W) with a 400 nm cutoff filter, a set of cylindrical quartz reactors (80 ml), and a cold trap to keep the temperature of reaction solution constant. By dissolving K2Cr2O7 and CAP in ultrapure water or diluting the stock solution with ultrapure water, varied concentrations of Cr(VI) and CAP solutions were obtained. The pH of the solution was adjusted to the anticipant value using a concentrated solution of NaOH or H2SO4. A set of tests were performed to investigate the photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP degradation over CuInS2 at various solution pHs and Cr(VI)/CAP ratios. Cr(VI) concentration was determined by the modified N, N-diphenylcarbazide spectrophotometry method (). The concentration of CAP in the solution was determined using high-resolution liquid chromatography (HPLC, Accela, Thermo Scientific, United States) equipped with an XB-C18 column (4.6250 mm, 5 m, Yuexu, China) and a UV detector. The mobile phase consisted of a 50: 50 mixture of acid aqueous solution (0.1% acetic acid) and acetonitrile. The chromatograms of CAP were achieved using a flow rate of 1.0 ml min−1, an injection volume of 10 μl, and 277 nm as UV detection wavelength. The column was maintained at a temperature of 30°C. For each time measurement, approximately 4 ml of the aqueous solution was withdrawn from the cylindrical quartz reactors and filtered through a 0.45 nm filter to get rid of catalysts.
The Photocatalytic Reaction Kinetics Model
The photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP degradation over CuInS2 under a variety of operating conditions were studied by pseudo-first-order kinetics, which was expressed as Eq. 1 ():
Here, C0 represents the concentration of Cr(VI) or CAP following the adsorption-desorption equilibrium, C represents the concentration of Cr(VI) or CAP at the irradiation time of t min, t represents the irradiation time (min), and k represents the apparent rate constant (min−1).
Results and Discussion
Characterization of the As-synthesized CuInS2
XRD was used to determine the crystalline structure of our CuInS2 product. As illustrated in Figure 1, there appear the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 28.1°, 32.2°, 47.1°, and 55.1°, which are respectively indexed to the (112), (200), (204), and (116) crystal planes of chalcopyrite structure CuInS2 (JCPDS card No. 85–1575). The weak and wide diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern suggests that our CuInS2 product has poor crystallization.
FIGURE 1
SEM and TEM were used to investigate the morphology and size of our produced CuInS2. As illustrated in Figures 2A–C, the CuInS2 sample exhibits a sheet stacking structure with dimensions ranging from 200 to 5,000 nm. The flake structure of CuInS2 allows for the exposure of more active sites, which is highly advantageous for photocatalytic reactions. The EDS spectrum (Figure 2D) demonstrated that the prepared sample comprised the Cu, In, and S elements with a Cu, In, and S atomic ratio of around 1: 1: 2, confirming the formation of CuInS2.
FIGURE 2
The whole XPS spectrum of our synthesized CuInS2 is shown in Figure 3A, which reveals the existence of Cu, In, S 2p, and adventitious C in this sample. The Cu 2p XPS spectrum of our synthesized CuInS2 is displayed in Figure 3B, which shows sharp peaks with binding energies of 951.48 eV (Cu 2p1/2) and 931.58 eV (Cu 2p3/2), respectively. There is no characteristic Cu2+ peak at 934.3 eV, indicating that only the Cu+ oxidation state is present in our synthesized CuInS2 (; ). The In 3 days XPS spectrum in Figure 3C shows two peaks at 452.68 eV and 445.08 eV, which match with In 3d3/2 and In 3d5/2, respectively. These binding energy values indicate that In is in the In3+ oxidation state (). The S 2p XPS spectrum (Figure 3D) was fitted into two peaks at 163.18 eV (S 2p1/2) and 161.88 eV (S 2p3/2), which are attributed to S2- bonded to In or Cu in CuInS2 (; ).
FIGURE 3
The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of our synthesized CuInS2 was used to analyze its optical absorption property and band gap energy (Eg). As illustrated in Figure 4A, the CuInS2 product demonstrates distinct absorption of visible light between 550 and 800 nm. The following formula (Eq. 2) can be used to estimate the Eg of the CuInS2 product ():where h is the Planck’s constant, α is the absorption coefficient, k is the constant, v is the light frequency, n = 1/2 for an indirect band gap semiconductor, or n = 2 for a direct band gap semiconductor. Since absorbance (A) is directly proportional to the absorbance coefficient (α), the same Eg value can be obtained by replacing α with A. CuInS2 is a direct band gap semiconductor. As shown in Figure 4B, by projecting the linear part of its (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) plot to zero, the Eg value of CuInS2 is obtained to be 1.52 eV, which is close to the reported values in the literature (; ). This means that the CuInS2 nanomaterial could be used as a visible-light-driven photocatalyst.
FIGURE 4
Effect of Solution pH on Cr(VI) Reduction and CAP Degradation
Since the solution pH can modify both the acid-base environment and the existing forms of Cr(VI), it is well established that the solution pH values exert a significant effect on photocatalytic activities (; ; ). The effects of varying the initial pH on Cr(VI) reduction are demonstrated in Figures 5A,B According to Figure 5A, the adsorption equilibrium between catalysts and Cr(VI) can be attained after they were mixed for 40 min, because the Cr(VI) concentration did not decrease when the adsorption duration was further raised to 60 min. When the pH value decreased from 7–9 to 5–3, the Cr(VI) adsorption capacity of CuInS2 increased rapidly. The pHPZC of prepared CuInS2 is determined to be 5.68, so in the solutions with pH less than 5.68, the surface charges of CuInS2 are positive, which is conducive to the adsorption of Cr2O72−, HCrO4− and CrO42− (). When the photoreduction process began, the reduction rates of Cr(VI) significantly increased with the lengthening of the irradiation period. In addition, the decrease of the solution pH from 9.01 to 3.00 also resulted in the faster reduction rates of Cr(VI). According to Figure 5B, when the solution pH value is 3.0, the k value (0.0108 min−1) of the photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction over CuInS2 is the largest, which is about 15.43 times as that (0.0007 min−1) at pH 9.01. One reason for this is that a lower pH promotes Cr(VI) adsorption on the photocatalyst, hence accelerating photocatalytic conversion. Another possibility is that lowering the pH value of reaction solution raises the chromate reduction potential. For example, one pH unit lower results in a rise in the standard reduction potential by 0.138 V (). So the E(Cr(VI)/Cr(III)) value increases from 0.24 to 1.06 V as the pH of the solution decreases from 9.00 to 3.00. From the viewpoint of both kinetics and thermodynamics, the photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction rate would be enhanced in the lower pH solution (; ).
FIGURE 5
As shown in Figure 6A, the pH value of the solution had little effect on the adsorption of CAP by CuInS2. However, the photodegradation rates of CAP can be remarkably affected by the pH of the solution. As shown in Figure 6B, when the solution’s starting pH is 3.0, the CAP degradation rate is the fastest at the given irradiation period, and the k value is 2.9 times that of pH 9.01. The rate of CAP degradation reduced as the pH of the solution increased, indicating that the more acidic solution promotes photocatalytic CAP degradation in the mixed solution system of CAP and Cr(VI). One reason for this is that the formed Cr(OH)3 tends to settle on the surface of the photocatalyst particles in neutral and alkaline solutions, reducing the available active sites of the photocatalysts and inhibiting further photocatalytic degradation of CAP and reduction of Cr(VI) (). The decrease in Cr(VI) conversion reduces the consumption of photogenerated electrons, causing more recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes and diminishing the photocatalytic oxidative degradation of CAP ().
FIGURE 6
Synergy of Photocatalytic Cr(VI) Reduction and CAP Degradation Over CuInS2
In the mixed solution of Cr(VI) and CAP, the possibility of simultaneous Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation by the photocatalysis of CuInS2 was tested. The effects of different initial CAP concentrations on the photocatalytic reduction of 10 mg/L Cr(VI) over CuInS2 and the corresponding kinetic behaviors were studied. As illustrated in Figure 7A, without CuInS2, the reduction of Cr(VI) in the Cr(VI)/CAP mixed solution under visible-light irradiation can be neglected. In the mere Cr(VI) solution (without CAP), the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by CuInS2 under visible-light irradiation for 120 min removed only 77.5% of Cr(VI). When the CAP/Cr(VI) ratio was 0.5: 1, over 94.3% of Cr(VI) was decreased after 120 min of visible-light irradiation, implying that the presence of CAP might increase Cr(VI) reduction by serving as a photogenerated hole scavenger. Also, it can be observed that a variation in the CAP/Cr(VI) ratio can lead to a change in the Cr(VI) reduction rate. The optimal CAP/Cr(VI) ratio is 0.5: 1, and the k value is about 3.7 times that without CAP (Figure 7B). This might be attributed to that when CAP concentration rises, more CAP or intermediates would be adsorbed on the CuInS2 surface, potentially covering the catalyst’s active sites ().
FIGURE 7
Besides, the effects of varying the initial Cr(VI) concentration on the degradation of 10 mg/L CAP over CuInS2 and the corresponding kinetic behaviors were examined. As shown in Figure 8A, CAP cannot be degraded without the presence of CuInS2 catalyst, and the coexistence of Cr(VI) can effectively improve the degradation rate of CAP in the presence of CuInS2 catalyst, similar to the effect of CAP on the reduction process of Cr(VI) in the mixed Cr(VI)/CAP solution under visible-light irradiation. The photodegradation kinetic behaviors of CAP over CuInS2 in the solutions containing different ratios of CAP and Cr(VI) were further explored, and the results are presented in Figure 8B. The k values increase with decreasing the CAP/Cr(VI) ratio from 1: 1 to 1: 2 and subsequently decrease with further decreasing the CAP/Cr(VI) ratio from 1: 2 to 1: 2.5. The optimized CAP/Cr(VI) ratio is 1: 2, with a k value (0.0078 min−1) for CAP degradation is about 1.5 times that of the mere CAP solution [without Cr(VI)]. The above results indicated that there is strong synergy between photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP degradation over CuInS2.
FIGURE 8
Possible Photocatalytic Mechanism
By carrying out the photocatalytic experiments with or without the addition of EDTA-Na2 (the scavenger for photogenerated holes) as well as in air or N2 environment, the mechanism of photocatalytic Cr(VI) conversion and CAP degradation over CuInS2 was investigated. Before the start of the experiments under the N2 environment, the reaction solution was purged with high-purity (> 99.999%) N2 for 1 h to eliminate the dissolved O2, and this process was maintained throughout the photocatalytic process. As shown in Figure 9, under visible-light illumination, the Cr(VI) conversion and CAP degradation over CuInS2 in the Cr(VI)/CAP mixed solution in the air environment were more efficient than those in the N2 environment. The suppressing impact of N2 environment was more noticeable in the case of Cr(VI) reduction, with the Cr(VI) reduction rate dropping from 71.9% in air to 53.3% in N2 environment. This is because that the interaction of dissolved O2 with photogenerated electrons can produce superoxide radicals (•O2) (). •O2 can be further converted to H2O2 or disproportioned to •OH, which affects the Cr(VI) reduction and CAP degradation, respectively. Furthermore, it has been shown that •O2 is capable of reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(V), hence improving Cr(VI) conversion (; ). As a consequence, the rates of Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation in the air environment are higher than those in the N2 environment. As shown in Figure 9, the conversion proportion of Cr(VI) and the degradation proportion of CAP are 71.9% and 49.6%, respectively, without the addition of EDTA-Na2 in the air environment under visible-light irradiation for 120 min. After adding EDTA-Na2, the Cr(VI) conversion rose to 91.5% while the CAP degradation decreased to 32.2%. Because EDTA-Na2 can efficiently capture photogenerated holes, so enhancing photogenerated charge carrier separation and has a promoting influence on Cr(VI) reduction (). On the other hand, the addition of EDTA-Na2 led to the decline in CAP degradation efficiency, suggesting that CAP degradation was mostly dependent on photogenerated holes (). In the N2 environment, the improvement in the Cr(VI) conversion and the decrease in the CAP degradation were also observed after adding EDTA-Na2. Nevertheless, when the reaction was carried out in the N2 environment, EDTA-Na2 had a smaller promoting impact on the reduction of Cr(VI), owing to the reduced of O2/•O2− mediated reduction in the decrease of dissolved O2 (; ).
FIGURE 9
We postulated the possible mechanisms for the photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation over CuInS2 as shown in Figure 10, based on the aforesaid results. Under visible-light irradiation, photogenerated electrons (e−) and photogenerated holes (h+) are produced respectively in the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) of CuInS2 (Eq. 3). Cr(VI) can be reduced by e− (Eq. 4), while CAP can be oxidized by h+ (Eq. 5). The two simultaneous processes are capable of accelerating the separation of e− and h+, resulting in a greater amount of e− for Cr(VI) reduction and h+ for CAP oxidation (). In addition, e− can combine with dissolved O2 to form •O2− (Eq. 6), and •O2− can reduce Cr(VI) in the presence of H+ (Eq. 7) (). Furthermore, •O2− can combine with H+ to make H2O2 (Eq. 8), which subsequently reacts with e− to form the powerful oxidizing •OH (Eq. 9). Meantime, CAP may be oxidized by h+ as well as the oxidizing species created, such as •O2−, •OH, and H2O2 (Eq. 10).
FIGURE 10
Reusability and Stability of CuInS2 Photocatalyst
The photocatalytic activity and durability of a catalyst are equally significant in practical applications. The photocatalytic endurance of CuInS2 was tested by performing five successive cycles of Cr(VI) reduction and CAP degradation in the mixed Cr(VI)/CAP solution by the same process as mentioned above, but 40 mg of photocatalyst and 200 ml of mixture were used. When each cycle ended, the photocatalyst was collected, washed and dried at 80°C for 12 h. In each cycle test, a certain amount of original Cr(VI)/CAP mixture was injected to maintain the initial concentration of pollutants. As indicated by Figure 11, both the Cr(VI) reduction rate and the CAP degradation rate decrease only a bit as the cycle number rises. The reduced percentage of Cr (VI) and the degraded percentage of CAP are in turn 71.9% and 49.6% in the first cycle, but still 68.7% and 46.2% in the fifth cycle, respectively. Thus, the CuInS2 photocatalyst has been shown to have fair reusability for synchronous photocatalytic Cr(VI) conversion and CAP degradation. Figures 12A,B show the XRD patterns and survey XPS spectra of the CuInS2 before and after the reuse tests. As can be seen from Figures 12A,B, the peak number and location of the CuInS2 after the reuse tests are virtually identical to those of fresh CuInS2, showing that the crystal structure, composition and elemental valence of CuInS2 have little change. Accordingly, CuInS2 appears to have strong stability and fair reusability, which bodes well for its future use in wastewater treatment.
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 12
Conclusion
CuInS2 nanoparticles were synthesized by a straightforward solvothermal method and explored as a photocatalyst in the simultaneous photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation under visible-light irradiation. It was demonstrated that lower pH and oxygenated atmosphere are advantageous for Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation. The simultaneous photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and oxidation of CAP over CuInS2 in the mixed Cr(VI)/CAP solution had synergistic effect, which was more efficient than only the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and only the photocatalytic oxidation of CAP. Furthermore, after five runs, the CuInS2 sample retains a high rate of mixed pollutant removal. The possible mechanisms for the simultaneous photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and oxidation of CAP over CuInS2 were proposed. The results of this work may shed light on the synergistic effect of Cr(VI) reduction and CAP oxidation on the CuInS2 catalyst. This study shows that CuInS2 is a potential high-performance visible-light photocatalyst for treatment of organic contaminants and heavy metal ions in water at once.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, CZ and YZ; methodology, CZ; investigation, CZ, XZ, and JL; resources, CZ and JL; data curation, CZ and YC; writing—original draft preparation, CZ; writing—review and editing, YZ; visualization, CZ and YL; supervision, YZ and JL; funding acquisition, CZ, YL, YC, and YL. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work is financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No. 202300410521), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21806194), the Science and Technology Research Plan Program of Henan Province (No. 222102320328), Scientific Research and Innovation Fund for College Students of Zhoukou Normal University (Nos. ZKNUD2022010, ZKNUD2022047).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdurahmanM. H.AbdullahA. Z.ShoparweN. F. (2021). A Comprehensive Review on Sonocatalytic, Photocatalytic, and Sonophotocatalytic Processes for the Degradation of Antibiotics in Water: Synergistic Mechanism and Degradation Pathway. Chem. Eng. J.413, 127412. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127412
2
BouyarmaneH.El BekkaliC.LabragJ.Es-saidiI.BouhnikO.AbdelmoumenH. (2021). Photocatalytic Degradation of Emerging Antibiotic Pollutants in Waters by TiO2/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Materials. Surfaces Interfaces24, 101155. 10.1016/J.SURFIN.2021.101155
3
CherifiY.BarrasA.AddadA.OuddaneB.RousselP.ChaouchiA.et al (2021). Simultaneous Photocatalytic Cr(VI) Reduction and Phenol Degradation over Copper Sulphide-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite under Visible Light Irradiation: Performance and Reaction Mechanism. Chemosphere268, 128798. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2020.128798
4
ChumhaN.PudkonW.ChachvalvutikulA.LuangwantaT.RandornC.InceesungvornB.et al (2020). Photocatalytic Activity of CuInS2 Nanoparticles Synthesized via a Simple and Rapid Microwave Heating Process. Mat. Res. Express7, 015074. 10.1088/2053-1591/AB6885
5
DengY.TangL.ZengG.ZhuZ.YanM.ZhouY.et al (2017). Insight into Highly Efficient Simultaneous Photocatalytic Removal of Cr(VI) and 2,4-diclorophenol under Visible Light Irradiation by Phosphorus Doped Porous Ultrathin g-C3N4 Nanosheets from Aqueous Media: Performance and Reaction Mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ.203, 343–354. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2016.10.046
6
DjellabiR.YangB.WangY.CuiX.ZhaoX. (2019). Carbonaceous Biomass-Titania Composites with TiOC Bonding Bridge for Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of Cr(VI) under Narrow Visible Light. Chem. Eng. J.366, 172–180. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2019.02.035
7
DjellabiR.ZhaoX.OrdonezM. F.FallettaE.BianchiC. L. (2021). Comparison of the Photoactivity of Several Semiconductor Oxides in Floating Aerogel and Suspension Systems towards the Reduction of Cr(VI) under Visible Light. Chemosphere281, 130839. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.130839
8
GeT.JiangZ.ShenL.LiJ.LuZ.ZhangY.et al (2021). Synthesis and Application of Fe3O4/FeWO4 Composite as an Efficient and Magnetically Recoverable Visible Light-Driven Photocatalyst for the Reduction of Cr(VI). Sep. Purif. Technol.263, 118401. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2021.118401
9
GeT.ShenL.LiJ.ZhangY.ZhangY. (2022). Morphology-controlled Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Cr(VI) Reduction Properties of α-Fe2O3. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.635, 128069. 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2021.128069
10
GuoF.ShiW.LiM.ShiY.WenH. (2019). 2D/2D Z-Scheme Heterojunction of CuInS2/g-C3N4 for Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity towards the Degradation of Tetracycline. Sep. Purif. Technol.210, 608–615. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2018.08.055
11
GuoJ.WangL.WeiX.AlothmanZ. A.AlbaqamiM. D.MalgrasV.et al (2021). Direct Z-Scheme CuInS2/Bi2MoO6 Heterostructure for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline under Visible Light. J. Hazard. Mat.415, 125591. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2021.125591
12
HanJ.LiY.YangL.LiT.LuoY.YangL.et al (2018). Mesoporous TiO2 with WO3 Functioning as Dopant and Light-Sensitizer: A Highly Efficient Photocatalyst for Degradation of Organic Compound. J. Hazard. Mat.358, 44–52. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2018.06.039
13
KaowphongS.ChoklapW.ChachvalvutikulA.ChandetN. (2019). A Novel CuInS2/m-BiVO4 p-n Heterojunction Photocatalyst with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.579, 123639. 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2019.123639
14
KumarD. P.SeoS.RangappaA. P.KimS.Joshi ReddyK. A.GopannagariM.et al (2022). Ultrathin Layered Zn-Doped MoS2 Nanosheets Deposited onto CdS Nanorods for Spectacular Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Alloys Compd.905, 164193. 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2022.164193
15
LeeladeviK.Vinoth KumarJ.ArunpandianM.ThiruppathiM.NagarajanE. R. (2021). Investigation on Photocatalytic Degradation of Hazardous Chloramphenicol Drug and Amaranth Dye by SmVO4 Decorated g-C3N4 Nanocomposites. Mat. Sci. Semicond. process.123, 105563. 10.1016/J.MSSP.2020.105563
16
LiM.RamachandranR.SakthivelT.WangF.XuZ. X. (2021). Siloxene: An Advanced Metal-free Catalyst for Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of Aqueous Cr(VI) under Visible Light. Chem. Eng. J.421, 129728. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.129728
17
LiM.ZhaoR.SuY.HuJ.YangZ.ZhangY. (2016). Hierarchically CuInS2 Nanosheet-Constructed Nanowire Arrays for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Mat. Interfaces3, 1600494. 10.1002/ADMI.201600494
18
LiS.TangX.ZangZ.YaoY.YaoZ.ZhongH.et al (2018). I-III-VI Chalcogenide Semiconductor Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Chin. J. Catal.39, 590–605. 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63052-9
19
LiuJ.ChenH.ZhuC.HanS.LiJ.SheS.et al (2022a). Efficient Simultaneous Removal of Tetracycline Hydrochloride and Cr(VI) through Photothermal-Assisted photocatalytic-Fenton-like Processes with CuOx/γ-Al2O3. J. Colloid Interface Sci.10.1016/J.JCIS.2022.04.091
20
LiuJ.WuJ.WangN.TianF.LiJ. (2022b). Surface Reconstruction of BiSI Nanorods for Superb Photocatalytic Cr(VI) Reduction under Near-Infrared Light Irradiation. Chem. Eng. J.435, 135152. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.135152
21
LiuX.LiuB.LiL.ZhugeZ.ChenP.LiC.et al (2019). Cu2In2ZnS5/Gd2O2S:Tb for Full Solar Spectrum Photoreduction of Cr(VI) and CO2 from UV/vis to Near-Infrared Light. Appl. Catal. B Environ.249, 82–90. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2019.02.061
22
LiuY.LinY.TangJ.LiuX.ChenL.TianY.et al (2022c). Preparation of a Coated ZH-Scheme (SnS2@CdS)/TiO2(001) Photocatalyst for Phenol Degradation with Simultaneous Cr(VI) Conversion. Appl. Surf. Sci.574, 151595. 10.1016/J.APSUSC.2021.151595
23
LiuY.ZhangY. C.XuX. F. (2009). Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of CdO2 Nanocrystals. J. Hazard. Mat.163, 1310–1314. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2008.07.101
24
MangiriR.Sunil kumarK.SubramanyamK.RatnakaramY. C.SudharaniA.ReddyD. A.et al (2021). Boosting Solar Driven Hydrogen Evolution Rate of CdS Nanorods Adorned with MoS2 and SnS2 Nanostructures. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun.43, 100437. 10.1016/J.COLCOM.2021.100437
25
MaoY.QiuJ.ZhangP.FeiZ.BianC.JananiB. J.et al (2022). A Strategy of Silver Ferrite/Bismuth Ferrite Nano-Hybrids Synthesis for Synergetic White-Light Photocatalysis, Antibacterial Systems and Peroxidase-like Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem.426, 113756. 10.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2021.113756
26
MarinhoB. A.CristóvãoR. O.LoureiroJ. M.BoaventuraR. A. R.VilarV. J. P. (2016). Solar Photocatalytic Reduction of Cr(VI) over Fe(III) in the Presence of Organic Sacrificial Agents. Appl. Catal. B Environ.192, 208–219. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2016.03.061
27
PatnaikS.DasK. K.MohantyA.ParidaK. (2018). Enhanced Photo Catalytic Reduction of Cr(VI) over Polymer-Sensitized g-C3N4/ZnFe2O4 and its Synergism with Phenol Oxidation under Visible Light Irradiation. Catal. Today315, 52–66. 10.1016/J.CATTOD.2018.04.008
28
QiuY.LuJ.YanY.NiuJ.DuanY. (2022). Bismuth Molybdate Photocatalyst for the Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline in Water under Visible-Light Irradiation. Surfaces Interfaces31, 102009. 10.1016/J.SURFIN.2022.102009
29
QuZ.LiuZ.WuA.PiaoC.LiS.WangJ.et al (2020). Preparation of a Coated Z-Scheme and H-type SrTiO3/(BiFeO3@ZnS) Composite Photocatalyst and Application in Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol with Simultaneous Conversion of Cr(VI). Sep. Purif. Technol.240, 116653. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2020.116653
30
SperaE. L.PereyraC. J.Di IorioY.BerruetM.VazquezM.MarottiR. E. (2022). Charge Dynamics in CuInS2 Photovoltaic Devices with In2S3 as Buffer Layer. Mat. Chem. Phys.282, 125871. 10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2022.125871
31
SunT.SuY.SongH.LvY. (2022). New Advanced Oxidation Progress with Chemiluminescence Behavior Based on NaClO Triggered by WS2 Nanosheets. J. Hazard. Mat.429, 128329. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2022.128329
32
SunY.XuL.JinP.BaiX.JinX.ShiX. (2021). Simultaneous Removal of Colorless Micropollutants and Hexavalent Chromium by Pristine TiO2 under Visible Light: An Electron Transfer Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J.405, 126968. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.126968
33
TahaA.Da’naE.HassaninH. A. (2021). Modified Activated Carbon Loaded with Bio-Synthesized Ag/ZnO Nanocomposite and its Application for the Removal of Cr(VI) Ions from Aqueous Solution. Surfaces Interfaces23, 100928. 10.1016/J.SURFIN.2021.100928
34
TaoX.HuX.WenZ.MingY.LiJ.LiuY.et al (2022). Highly Efficient Cr(VI) Removal from Industrial Electroplating Wastewater over Bi2S3 Nanostructures Prepared by Dual Sulfur-Precursors: Insights on the Promotion Effect of Sulfate Ions. J. Hazard. Mat.424, 127423. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2021.127423
35
WangJ. C.RenJ.YaoH. C.ZhangL.WangJ. S.ZangS. Q.et al (2016). Synergistic Photocatalysis of Cr(VI) Reduction and 4-Chlorophenol Degradation over Hydroxylated α-Fe2O3 under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Hazard. Mat.311, 11–19. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2016.02.055
36
WangJ. W.QiuF. G.WangP.GeC.WangC. C. (2021a). Boosted Bisphenol A and Cr(VI) Cleanup over Z-Scheme WO3/MIL-100(Fe) Composites under Visible Light. J. Clean. Prod.279, 123408. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123408
37
WangX.XieY.TongW.HuW.WangY.ZhangY. (2021b). Photochemical Degradation of Chloramphenicol over Jarosite/oxalate System: Performance and Mechanism Investigation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.9, 104570. 10.1016/J.JECE.2020.104570
38
WangY.PengJ.XuY.ZhaoR.HanJ.WangL. (2022). Facile Fabrication of CdSe/CuInS2 Microflowers with Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Activity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy47, 8294–8302. 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.12.182
39
WeiH.HouC.ZhangY.NanZ. (2017). Scalable Low Temperature in Air Solid Phase Synthesis of Porous Flower-like Hierarchical Nanostructure SnS2 with Superior Performance in the Adsorption and Photocatalytic Reduction of Aqueous Cr(VI). Sep. Purif. Technol.189, 153–161. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2017.08.014
40
WeiH.ZhangQ.ZhangY.YangZ.ZhuA.DionysiouD. D. (2016). Enhancement of the Cr(VI) Adsorption and Photocatalytic Reduction Activity of g-C3N4 by Hydrothermal Treatment in HNO3 Aqueous Solution. Appl. Catal. A Gen.521, 9–18. 10.1016/J.APCATA.2015.11.005
41
WuY.MaoS.LiuC.PeiF.WangF.HaoQ.et al (2022). Enhanced Degradation of Chloramphenicol through Peroxymonosulfate and Visible Light over Z-Scheme Photocatalysts: Synergetic Performance and Mechanism Insights. J. Colloid Interface Sci.608, 322–333. 10.1016/J.JCIS.2021.09.197
42
WuZ.HeX.XueY.YangX.LiY.LiQ.et al (2020). Cyclodextrins Grafted MoS2/g-C3N4 as High-Performance Photocatalysts for the Removal of Glyphosate and Cr(VI) from Simulated Agricultural Runoff. Chem. Eng. J.399, 125747. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.125747
43
XiaQ.HuangB.YuanX.WangH.WuZ.JiangL.et al (2018). Modified Stannous Sulfide Nanoparticles with Metal-Organic Framework: Toward Efficient and Enhanced Photocatalytic Reduction of Chromium (VI) under Visible Light. J. Colloid Interface Sci.530, 481–492. 10.1016/J.JCIS.2018.05.015
44
XiongJ.ZengH. Y.ChenC. R.PengD. Y.XuS.AnD. S. (2022). Conjugated Hollow polyaniline/CuBi2O4 Composite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible-Light. Surfaces Interfaces29, 101804. 10.1016/J.SURFIN.2022.101804
45
XuF.ZhangJ.ZhuB.YuJ.XuJ. (2018). CuInS2 Sensitized TiO2 Hybrid Nanofibers for Improved Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ.230, 194–202. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2018.02.042
46
XuP.ZhengD.XieZ.HeQ.YuJ. (2020). The Degradation of Ibuprofen in a Novel Microbial Fuel Cell with PANi@CNTs/SS Bio-Anode and CuInS2 Photocatalytic Cathode: Property, Efficiency and Mechanism. J. Clean. Prod.265, 121872. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121872
47
YangJ.SunJ.ChenS.LanD.LiZ.LiZ.et al (2022). S-Scheme 1 T Phase MoSe2/AgBr Heterojunction toward Antibiotic Degradation: Photocatalytic Mechanism, Degradation Pathways, and Intermediates Toxicity Evaluation. Sep. Purif. Technol.290, 120881. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2022.120881
48
YangL.GuoJ.YangT.GuoC.ZhangS.LuoS.et al (2021a). Self-assembly Cu2O Nanowire Arrays on Cu Mesh: A Solid-State, Highly-Efficient, and Stable Photocatalyst for Toluene Degradation under Sunlight. J. Hazard. Mat.402, 123741. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123741
49
YangS.MaW.ZhangZ.ZhuJ.LiuY.ZhangH.et al (2021b). Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Inorganic Hole Transport Material of CuInS2 with High Efficiency and Stability. Sol. Energy230, 485–491. 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2021.10.040
50
YangY.ZhangH.ZhaoY.SongY.WuH.YangS. (2015). Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon Nanotube–CuInS2 Hybrids. Diam. Relat. Mat.59, 13–20. 10.1016/J.DIAMOND.2015.08.015
51
YuJ.HouX.HuX.YuanH.WangJ.ChenC. (2019). Efficient Degradation of Chloramphenicol by Zero-Valent Iron Microspheres and New Insights in Mechanisms. Appl. Catal. B Environ.256, 117876. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2019.117876
52
YueM.WangR.MaB.CongR.GaoW.YangT. (2016). Superior Performance of CuInS2 for Photocatalytic Water Treatment: Full Conversion of Highly Stable Nitrate Ions into Harmless N2 under Visible Light. Catal. Sci. Technol.6, 8300–8308. 10.1039/C6CY01858K
53
YueW.WeiF.HeC.WuD.TangN.QiaoQ. (2017). l -Cysteine Assisted-Synthesis of 3D In2S3 for 3D CuInS2 and its Application in Hybrid Solar Cells. RSC Adv.7, 37578–37587. 10.1039/C7RA05730J
54
ZhangF.ZhangY.WangY.ZhuA.ZhangY. (2022). Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of Aqueous Cr(VI) by Zr4+ Doped and Polyaniline Coupled SnS2 Nanoflakes. Sep. Purif. Technol.283, 120161. 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2021.120161
55
ZhangF.ZhangY.ZhangG.YangZ.DionysiouD. D.ZhuA. (2018). Exceptional Synergistic Enhancement of the Photocatalytic Activity of SnS2 by Coupling with Polyaniline and N-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ.236, 53–63. 10.1016/J.APCATB.2018.05.002
56
ZhangF.ZhangY.ZhouC.YangZ.XueH.DionysiouD. D. (2017). A New High Efficiency Visible-Light Photocatalyst Made of SnS2 and Conjugated Derivative of Polyvinyl Alcohol and its Application to Cr(VI) Reduction. Chem. Eng. J.324, 140–153. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2017.05.009
57
ZhangS.ZhangZ.SiY.LiB.DengF.YangL.et al (2021). Gradient Hydrogen Migration Modulated with Self-Adapting S Vacancy in Copper-Doped ZnIn2S4 Nanosheet for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Nano15, 15238–15248. 10.1021/ACSNANO.1C05834/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/NN1C05834_0007.JPEG
58
ZhangY.ZhangF.YangZ.XueH.DionysiouD. D. (2016). Development of a New Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalyst from SnS2 and Polyvinyl Chloride. J. Catal.344, 692–700. 10.1016/J.JCAT.2016.10.022
Summary
Keywords
CuInS2, Cr(VI) reduction, chloramphenicol degradation, synergistic effect, visible light photocatalysis
Citation
Zhu C, Li J, Chai Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Liu J and Li Y (2022) Synergistic Cr(VI) Reduction and Chloramphenicol Degradation by the Visible-Light-Induced Photocatalysis of CuInS2: Performance and Reaction Mechanism. Front. Chem. 10:964008. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.964008
Received
08 June 2022
Accepted
20 June 2022
Published
12 July 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Yue Li, Henan Institute of Engineering, China
Reviewed by
Lixia Yang, Nanchang Hangkong University, China
Dafeng Yan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zhu, Li, Chai, Zhang, Li, Zhang, Liu and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chaosheng Zhu, zhuchsh@foxmail.com; Yongcai Zhang, zhangyc@yzu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Nanoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.