Biomimetic lipid–fluorescein probe for cellular bioimaging

Abstract

Fluorescence probe is one of the most powerful tools for cellular imaging. Here, three phospholipid-mimicking fluorescent probes (FP1–FP3) comprising fluorescein and two lipophilic groups of saturated and/or unsaturated C18 fatty acids were synthesized, and their optical properties were investigated. Like in biological phospholipids, the fluorescein group acts as a hydrophilic polar headgroup and the lipid groups act as hydrophobic non-polar tail groups. Laser confocal microscope images illustrated that FP3, which contains both saturated and unsaturated lipid tails, showed great uptake into the canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

1 Introduction

Living cell has a plasma membrane that guards the cell nucleus and cytoplasm from the external environment and controls material flow. It is essential that fluorescent probes have membrane affinity to penetrate or accumulate inside of it because the cellular membrane regulates the uptake of extracellular materials inside of the cells. Cell membranes are comprised of phospholipids, cholesterols, and proteins (Yèagle, 1989; Edidin, 2003). The main components are the phospholipids, which comprise an electrically charged polar headgroup and lipophilic fatty acid tails, causing them to form unique assembly structures called lipid bilayers in aqueous media (Daleke, 2003). Cholesterols contained within the bilayer provide membrane flexibility (Brown and London, 1998; Brown and Goldstein, 1999), while proteins loaded on the cell membranes constitute approximately 50 wt% of the entire cell membrane weight. The proteins perform a variety of functions such as regulating material exchange and receiving intercellular signals (von Heijne, 1981). The membrane is the first barrier of cells; therefore, its status is closely related to cell health (Ng et al., 2012).

Several imaging methods have been developed for cell analysis (Chen et al., 2008; García-Sáez and Schwille, 2010; Mohrig et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2014; Ogiso et al., 2015). Among these, cell imaging using fluorescent probes is useful because of its rapidity, simplicity, and efficiency (Niu et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2015; Lyu and Pu, 2017; Yan et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019). In general, fluorescent probes for cell imaging are designed by integrating a cell targeting unit with a fluorophore (Guo et al., 2014; Umezawa et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019). Notably, phospholipid-based probes show great affinity to cell membranes owing to their natural similarity to the cell membrane structure. To achieve effective cellular imaging, probes structurally similar with phospholipids have been extensively studied in last two decades. It was reported that a probe containing lipophilic groups effectively penetrates cell membranes. (Honig and Hume, 1989; Yan et al., 2008). Several groups reported novel cellular probes by the introduction of hydrophilic groups (Heek et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Kreder et al., 2015; Collot et al., 2019b). One of notable developments of probes is oxazolopyridine-based fluorophore by Wang et al. (2021). Oxazolopyridine, which contain both quaternary ammonium groups, show affinity to the outer membrane layer. In addition, simple lipid tail attached on base moiety increases stability of fluorophore when it is merged into inner membrane layer. Cyanine-based fluorescent probes, known as MemBright, have been developed for advanced cellular imaging and neuroscience applications (Collot et al., 2019a). The MemBright fluorophores form aggregates that cause aggregation-caused quenching in aqueous media, thereby minimizing background fluorescence. To balance the lipophilic and hydrophilic properties of probes for effective cell imaging, many synthetic methods have been developed. (Kato et al., 2004; Teramura et al., 2008; Kamitani et al., 2009; Teramura and Iwata, 2010). In addition, various chemical substances for targeting cells have recently been reported. Examples include N-heterocyclic small molecules (Li et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023), benzothiadiazoles (Neto et al., 2022), and AIE molecules (Xiao et al., 2023).

We aimed at phospholipid-mimicking fluorescent probes for improving permeability into cell membranes. Herein, we report on the synthesis and optical properties of three phospholipid-mimicking fluorescent probes, FP1–FP3, which comprise fluorescein as a fluorescent body and saturated and/or unsaturated C18 fatty acids as lipophilic tails.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 General methods

All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. ¹H NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a 500 MHz JEOL JNM–ECZ 500R/S1 spectrometer. ¹H NMR data are reported as follows: s: singlet, d: doublet, t: triplet, m: multiplet. Chemical shifts in the ¹H NMR spectra are reported in parts per million (ppm) compared to a tetramethylsilane (0 ppm) standard. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) was conducted on a MALDI TOF Voyager DE-STR (Applied Biosystems, USA) mass spectrometer. Thin layer chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 F254 plates. Ultraviolet–visible (UV-vis) absorption spectra were measured with a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Jasco V-670). Fluorescence emission spectra were collected using a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer with excitation and emission slit widths of 5 nm. Column chromatography was performed using Merck silica gel (230–400 mesh).

2.2 Synthesis

2.2.1 Synthesis of P1

3,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde (1 g, 7.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (4 g, 28.9 mmol) were added to 100 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF) and stirred at 65 °C for 30 min. Stearoyl chloride (4.5 g, 14.8 mmol) was added dropwise under a nitrogen atmosphere. Subsequently, the mixture was slowly heated to 90°C and stirred for 12 h, after which the crude product was extracted and washed three times with ether and water. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure, and the remaining extracted products were purified by silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/hexane (1/10, v/v) as the eluent to obtain 3.5 g of pure product. Yield: 72%; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 9.95 (s, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (s, 1H), 2.56 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 1.71–1.77 (m, 4H), 1.25–1.42 (m, 56H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 670.65 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 671.04).

2.2.2 Synthesis of P2

3,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde (1 g, 7.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (4 g, 28.9 mmol) were added to 100 mL of DMF and stirred at 65 °C for 30 min. Oleoyl chloride (4.5 g, 14.8 mmol) was added dropwise under a nitrogen atmosphere. Subsequently, the mixture was slowly heated to 90°C and stirred for 12 h, after which the crude product was extracted and washed three times with ether and water. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure, and the remaining extracted products were purified by silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/hexane (1/10, v/v) as the eluent to obtain 3.8 g of pure product. Yield: 80%; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 9.95 (s, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.32–5.38 (m, 4H), 2.56 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H), 2.00 (q, J = 6.1 Hz, 8H), 1.71–1.77 (m, 4H), 1.26–1.42 (m, 40H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 666.68 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 667.01).

2.2.3 Synthesis of P3

3,5-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde (3 g, 21.6 mmol) and potassium carbonate (12 g, 86.7 mmol) were added to 300 mL of DMF and stirred at 65°C for 30 min. Then, oleoyl chloride (6.5 g, 21.6 mmol) was added dropwise under a nitrogen atmosphere, and the mixture was slowly heated to 90°C and stirred for 12 h. The crude product was then extracted and washed three times with ether and water. Subsequently, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the remaining extracted products were purified by silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/hexane (1/5, v/v) as the eluent to obtain 3.8 g of pure product. Yield: 60%; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 9.87 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J = 1.7 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.32–5.38 (m, 2H), 2.56–2.59 (m, 2H), 2.00 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 4H), 1.72–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.26–1.42 (m, 20H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 402.38 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 402.57).

2.2.4 Synthesis of P4

P3 (3 g, 7.4 mmol) and potassium carbonate (4 g, 28.9 mmol) were added to 100 mL of DMF and stirred at 65°C for 30 min. Stearoyl chloride (4.5 g, 14.8 mmol) was added dropwise under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was slowly heated to 90°C and stirred for 12 h, after which the crude product was extracted and washed three times with ether and water. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure, and the remaining extracted products were purified by silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/hexane (1/10, v/v) as the eluent to obtain 3.7 g of pure product. Yield: 77%; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 9.95 (s, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 5.34 (m, 2H), 2.56 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H), 2.01 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 4H), 1.74 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 1.25–1.41 (m, 48H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 669.05 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 669.03).

2.2.5 General procedure for the synthesis of probes FP1–FP3

5-Aminofluorescein (0.25 g, 0.72 mmol) was dissolved with P1, P2, or P4 (0.72 mmol) in ethyl alcohol (EtOH; 20 mL). The reaction mixture was left for 6 h at reflux. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The remaining products were purified by silica gel column chromatography with methyl alcohol (MeOH)/CHCl₃ (1:9, v/v) as the eluent to obtain the final products FP1, FP2, and FP3 with yields of 40%, 42%, and 50%, respectively.

2.2.5.1 Probe FP1

¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-D₆): δ 10.07 (s, 1H), 8.78 (s, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.49–6.65 (m, 6H), 2.54–2.59 (m, 6H), 1.93 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H), 1.61 (q, 4H), 1.11–1.31 (m, 52H), 0.78–0.81 (m, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 1000.47 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 1000.35).

2.2.5.2 Probe FP2

¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-D₆): δ 10.11 (s, 1H), 8.79 (s, 1H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 6.51–6.65 (m, 6H), 5.27–5.30 (m, 4H), 1.94 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H), 1.61 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H), 1.08–1.26 (m, 48H), 0.70–0.81 (m, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 996.47 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 996.32).

2.2.5.3 Probe FP3

¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-D₆): δ 10.11 (s, 1H), 8.79 (s, 1H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 6.49–6.65 (m, 6H), 5.27–5.32 (m, 2H), 2.57 (m, 4H) 1.93 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 4H), 1.61 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 4H), 1.11–1.31 (m, 48H), 0.78–0.81 (m, 6H); MALDI-TOF-MS: m/z 998.48 (calcd. for [M + H]⁺: 998.33).

2.2.6 Preparation of test solution of probes FP1–FP3

A test solution of 10 μM was prepared by diluting a probe solution of 1 mM by 100 times. The dilute solvent was dimethyl sulfoxide.

2.2.7 Cell culture

Canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) F-12 solution at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. For confocal microscopy, cells were plated in 16-well plates (1.5 × 10⁴ cells per well in 200 μL DMEM F-12).

2.2.8 Cell toxicity assay

The cytotoxicity of dyes FP1–FP3 was determined by MTT cell proliferation assay (Abcam). Owing to the intracellular reduction of tetrazolium salt to formazan in viable cells, viability can be measured by formazan detection at 595 nm. Each well of a 96-well plate was seeded with 0.75 × 10⁴ canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in DMEM F-12 at 37°C. After 24 h, the medium was removed, and the cells were treated with a medium containing probes FP1–FP3 (final concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 μM) and incubated for 12 h. For each sample group, 5 wells were prepared. In addition, each plate contained three control wells (cells with untreated DMEM F-12). After incubation, 15 μL of MTT solution was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, 100 μL of the solubilization/stop solution was added to each well. After further incubation for 24 h, the absorbance at 595 nm was recorded using a 96-well plate reader.

2.2.9 Cell confocal imaging

For the laser confocal fluorescence imaging experiments, cells were incubated with probes FP1–FP3 (10 μM) for 30 min. After incubation with probes FP1–FP3, the incubated cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and then photographed by confocal microscopy. Green channel images (490–550 nm) were obtained upon excitation at 488 nm. All cell images were processed using Zeiss ZEN 3.1 software.

2.2.10 Flow cytometry analysis

Cells were cultured to populations of 10⁶ cells each with PBS buffer solution. The prepared cells were stained with probes FP1–FP3 for 4 h, then washed two times with PBS and transferred to a Falcon 5 mL test tube for analysis using a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer. The results were analyzed with FCS Express flow cytometry software. The cellular membrane-bound probes were quantified based on the relative intensity of the fluorescence signal to the average mean fluorescence intensity of the control group.

3 Results

3.1 Design and synthesis

FP1-FP3 probes were designed to have similar structures with typical phospholipid molecules. In order to make phospholipid-like fluorescent probes, fluorescein is selected to be hydrophilic head group, for its biocompatibility and high hydrophilicity. Furthermore, probes were attached with artificial lipid tails moiety instead of cell-originated lipid tails. Advantages from this method is not only easy synthesis, but also easy to change which tails would be attached between saturated and/or unsaturated lipid tails. The synthetic routes of probes FP1–FP3 are shown in Scheme 1. P1, P2, and P4 are prepared by the acylation of saturated and unsaturated acyl chlorides, with yields of 70%–80%. Probes FP1, FP2, and FP3 were synthesized by the condensation of 5-aminofluorescein with P1, P2, and P4, respectively, with yields of 40%, 42%, and 50%, respectively. FP1–FP3 were fully characterized using ¹H-NMR spectroscopy and MALDI-TOF MS.

SCHEME 1

3.2 Photophysical properties

The optical properties of probes FP1–FP3 were investigated by measuring their absorption and emission spectra in MeOH at a concentration of 10 μM. The results are shown in Figure 1. Because the structure of the fluorescein group is not directly modified by the synthetic procedure, the absorbance spectra of FP1–FP3 were almost identical, with two absorption peaks at 452 and 480 nm. The fluorescence emission spectra also showed a minimal difference, with a single peak at 513 nm. Fluorescence quantum yields (Φ_f) for FP1, FP2, and FP3 were calculated to be 0.36, 0.34, and 0.38, respectively, compared to the standard (fluorescein, Φ_f = 0.91 in MeOH). (Magde et al., 2002; Levitus, 2020). These results demonstrate that the biomimetic phospholipid tails do not affect the photophysical properties of the fluorophore to which they are attached.

FIGURE 1

3.3 Cell toxicity and fluorescence imaging of living cells

The probes qualified as hypotoxic, as shown in Figure 2. Thus, cell imaging experiments were carried out in living canine adipose mesenchymal stem cells to study the organelle-targeting behavior of the probes. Stem cells were stained using probes FP1–FP3 (10 μM; green channel) and cultured in an incubator at 37°C for 30 min. The fluorescence images were recorded by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 3). The imaging results showed that all three fluorescent probes reside inside of the cells. In specific, FP1 appeared to be weakly localized in the thickest part of the cell membrane, while FP2 and FP3 are almost internalized in cell cytoplasm.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

3.4 Flow cytometry analysis

Flow cytometry is an analytical technique that utilizes light to count and profile cells in a heterogenous fluid mixture. Stem cells were treated with probes FP1–FP3 and analyzed by flow cytometry. There was an overall increase in the fluorescence intensity after treatment with all three probes (Figure 4). FP1 and FP2 showed mean increases of 81.4% and 80.8%, respectively. Surprisingly, FP3 showed a more significant increase of 294%.

FIGURE 4

4 Discussion

In summary, a series of fluorescein-based cell staining probes based on a biomimetic phospholipid-like structure were designed and synthesized. The basic structure of a cell membrane consists of a bilayer scaffold of phospholipids with hydrophilic headgroups and hydrophobic alkyl chain tails. For biological applications, fluorescent probes need to have good biocompatibility. Fluorescein is hydrophilic, which prevents it from aggregating in microcellular environments, and its biocompatibility is well studied and accepted. Probes FP1–FP3 had almost identical optical properties to those of the parent molecule, fluorescein. They also had low cytotoxicity toward canine adipose mesenchymal stem cells. In confocal laser scanning microscopy results, FP1-FP3 achieved good cell staining ability. Cells washed after the staining procedure showed green fluorescence under the excitation light, and the intensity profile along the cross-sectional ROI of FP1-FP3 clearly demonstrated that the probe penetrated into the cells and accumulated inside the cytoplasm. Flow cytometry has shown that probe FP3, which contains both saturated and unsaturated C18 alkyl chains, is having exquisite internalization ability towards the cell cytoplasm through the cell membrane. These results might provide a better understanding of the design of fluorescent molecules for bioimaging. That is, unsaturated alkyl chains are relatively rigid, but long saturated alkyl chains are flexible (Subczynski et al., 1993; Yamada et al., 2022). Like phospholipid, FP3 molecules with both rigid and flexible tails are favorable structures for cytoplasmic internalization.

References

• 1

  Brown D. A. London E. (1998). Structure and origin of ordered lipid domains in biological membranes. J. Membr. Biol.164, 103–114. 10.1007/s002329900397

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Brown M. S. Goldstein J. L. (1999). A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.96, 11041–11048. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11041

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  Chen H. Zheng Y. Jiang J.-H. Wu H.-L. Shen G.-L. Yu R.-Q. (2008). An ultrasensitive chemiluminescence biosensor for cholera toxin based on ganglioside-functionalized supported lipid membrane and liposome. Biosens. Bioelectron.24, 684–689. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.06.031

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  Collot M. Ashokkumar P. Anton H. Boutant E. Faklaris O. Galli T. et al (2019a). MemBright: A family of fluorescent membrane probes for advanced cellular imaging and neuroscience. Cell. Chem. Biol.26, 600–614.e7. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Collot M. Boutant E. Lehmann M. Klymchenko A. S. (2019b). BODIPY with tuned amphiphilicity as a fluorogenic plasma membrane probe. Bioconjug. Chem.30, 192–199. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00828

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Daleke D. L. (2003). Regulation of transbilayer plasma membrane phospholipid asymmetry. J. Lipid Res.44, 233–242. 10.1194/jlr.R200019-JLR200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  Edidin M. (2003). Lipids on the frontier: A century of cell-membrane bilayers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.4, 414–418. 10.1038/nrm1102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  Gao P. Pan W. Li N. Tang B. (2019). Fluorescent probes for organelle-targeted bioactive species imaging. Chem. Sci.10, 6035–6071. 10.1039/C9SC01652J

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  García-Sáez A. J. Schwille P. (2010). Surface analysis of membrane dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr.1798, 766–776. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.09.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  Guo Z. Park S. Yoon J. Shin I. (2014). Recent progress in the development of near-infrared fluorescent probes for bioimaging applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 16–29. 10.1039/C3CS60271K

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  Heek T. Nikolaus J. Schwarzer R. Fasting C. Welker P. Licha K. et al (2013). An amphiphilic perylene imido diester for selective cellular imaging. Bioconjug. Chem.24, 153–158. 10.1021/bc3005655

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  Honig M. G. Hume R. I. (1989). Dil and DiO: Versatile fluorescent dyes for neuronal labelling and pathway tracing. Trends Neurosci.12, 333–341. 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90040-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  Kamitani R. Niikura K. Okajima T. Matsuo Y. Ijiro K. (2009). Design of cell-surface-retained polymers for artificial ligand display. Chembiochem10, 230–233. 10.1002/cbic.200800621

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  Kato K. Itoh C. Yasukouchi T. Nagamune T. (2004). Rapid protein anchoring into the membranes of mammalian cells using oleyl chain and poly(ethylene glycol) derivatives. Biotechnol. Prog.20, 897–904. 10.1021/bp0342093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  Kreder R. Oncul S. Kucherak O. A. Pyrshev K. A. Real E. Mély Y. et al (2015). Blue fluorogenic probes for cell plasma membranes fill the gap in multicolour imaging. RSC Adv.5, 22899–22905. 10.1039/C4RA16225K

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  Levitus M. (2020). Tutorial: Measurement of fluorescence spectra and determination of relative fluorescence quantum yields of transparent samples. Methods Appl. Fluoresc.8, 033001. 10.1088/2050-6120/ab7e10

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  Li Y. Liu T. Sun J. (2023). Recent advances in N-heterocyclic small molecules for synthesis and application in direct fluorescence cell imaging. Molecules28, 733. 10.3390/molecules28020733

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Lin V. S. Chen W. Xian M. Chang C. J. (2015). Chemical probes for molecular imaging and detection of hydrogen sulfide and reactive sulfur species in biological systems. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 4596–4618. 10.1039/C4CS00298A

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  Lyu Y. Pu K. (2017). Recent advances of activatable molecular probes based on semiconducting polymer nanoparticles in sensing and imaging. Adv. Sci.4, 1600481. 10.1002/advs.201600481

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  Magde D. Wong R. Seybold P. G. (2002). Fluorescence quantum yields and their relation to lifetimes of rhodamine 6G and fluorescein in nine solvents: Improved absolute standards for quantum yields. Photochem. Photobiol.75, 327. 10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0327:FQYATR>2.0.CO;2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  Mohrig J. R. Hammond C. N. Schatz P. F. (2010). Techniques in organic Chemistry. New York: W. H. Freeman.

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Neto B. A. D. Correa J. R. Spencer J. (2022). Fluorescent benzothiadiazole derivatives as fluorescence imaging dyes: A decade of new generation probes. Chem. – A Eur. J.28, e202103262. 10.1002/chem.202103262

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  Ng D. P. Poulsen B. E. Deber C. M. (2012). Membrane protein misassembly in disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1818, 1115–1122. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.046

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  Niu J. Wang X. Lv J. Li Y. Tang B. (2014). Luminescent nanoprobes for in-vivo bioimaging. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.58, 112–119. 10.1016/j.trac.2014.02.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  Ogiso H. Taniguchi M. Okazaki T. (2015). Analysis of lipid-composition changes in plasma membrane microdomains. J. Lipid Res.56, 1594–1605. 10.1194/jlr.M059972

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  Subczynski W. K. Markowska E. Sielewiesiuk J. (1993). Spin-label studies on phosphatidylcholine-polar carotenoid membranes: Effects of alkyl-chain length and unsaturation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr.1150, 173–181. 10.1016/0005-2736(93)90087-G

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  Teramura Y. Iwata H. (2010). Cell surface modification with polymers for biomedical studies. Soft Matter6, 1081. 10.1039/b913621e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  Teramura Y. Kaneda Y. Totani T. Iwata H. (2008). Behavior of synthetic polymers immobilized on a cell membrane. Biomaterials29, 1345–1355. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.048

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  Umezawa K. Yoshida M. Kamiya M. Yamasoba T. Urano Y. (2017). Rational design of reversible fluorescent probes for live-cell imaging and quantification of fast glutathione dynamics. Nat. Chem.9, 279–286. 10.1038/nchem.2648

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  von Heijne G. (1981). Membrane proteins. The amino acid composition of membrane-penetrating segments. Eur. J. Biochem.120, 275–278. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05700.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Wang H. Guo X. Bu W. Kang Z. Yu C. Wu Q. et al (2023). Boronic acid derived salicylidenehydrazinopyridine (BOSPY) complexes with aggregation-induced emission for fluorescence imaging of cellular organelles. Dye. Pigment.210, 111013. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.111013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  Wang Y.-N. Xu B. Qiu L.-H. Xu Y.-J. Sun R. Ge J.-F. (2021). A series of novel cell membrane fluorescent probes based on oxazolopyridine unit. Dye. Pigment.185, 108883. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108883

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  Wu L. Sedgwick A. C. Sun X. Bull S. D. He X.-P. James T. D. (2019). Reaction-based fluorescent probes for the detection and imaging of reactive oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur species. Acc. Chem. Res.52, 2582–2597. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00302

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  Xiao X. Cai H. Huang Q. Wang B. Wang X. Luo Q. et al (2023). Polymeric dual-modal imaging nanoprobe with two-photon aggregation-induced emission for fluorescence imaging and gadolinium-chelation for magnetic resonance imaging. Bioact. Mat.19, 538–549. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.04.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Xu H. Li Q. Wang L. He Y. Shi J. Tang B. et al (2014). Nanoscale optical probes for cellular imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 2650. 10.1039/c3cs60309a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  Xu Z. Qin T. Zhou X. Wang L. Liu B. (2019). Fluorescent probes with multiple channels for simultaneous detection of Cys, Hcy, GSH, and H2S. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.121, 115672. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115672

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  Yamada Y. Iida H. Shibano S. Mihara N. Kato T. Tanaka K. (2022). Front cover: Significant effect of the flexibility of bridging alkyl chains on the proximity of stacked porphyrin and phthalocyanine conjugated with a fourfold rotaxane linkage (chem. Eur. J. 37/2022). Chem. – A Eur. J.28, e202201616. 10.1002/chem.202201616

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  Yan F. Fan K. Bai Z. Zhang R. Zu F. Xu J. et al (2017). Fluorescein applications as fluorescent probes for the detection of analytes. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.97, 15–35. 10.1016/j.trac.2017.08.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  Yan P. Xie A. Wei M. Loew L. M. (2008). Amino(oligo)thiophene-Based environmentally sensitive biomembrane chromophores. J. Org. Chem.73, 6587–6594. 10.1021/jo800852h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  Yèagle P. L. (1989). Lipid regulation of cell membrane structure and function. FASEB J.3, 1833–1842. 10.1096/fasebj.3.7.2469614

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  Zhang X. Wang C. Jin L. Han Z. Xiao Y. (2014). Photostable bipolar fluorescent probe for video tracking plasma membranes related cellular processes. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces6, 12372–12379. 10.1021/am503849c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Zhao W. Tian Y. Cai M. Wang F. Wu J. Gao J. et al (2014). Studying the nucleated mammalian cell membrane by single molecule approaches. PLoS One9, e91595. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091595

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar