Abstract
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently been considered the promising catalysts due to their merits of abundant metal sites, versatile coordination groups, and tunable porous structure. However, low electronic conductivity of most MOFs obstructs their direct application in electrocatalysis. In this work, we fabricate an Ni–Rh bimetallic conductive MOF ([Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC) grown in situ on carbon cloth. Abundant nanopores in the conductive MOFs expose additional catalytic active sites, and the advantageous 2D π-conjugated structure helps accelerate charge transfer. Owing to the introduction of Rh, [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC exhibited substantially improved oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity and exhibited only an overpotential of 320 mV to achieve the current density of 20 mA cm-2. The remarkable OER performance confirmed by the electrochemical tests could be ascribed to the synergistic effect caused by the doped Rh together with Ni in [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC, thereby exhibiting outstanding electrocatalytic performance.
1 Introduction
With increasing energy consumption and global environmental concerns, renewable and clean energy technologies have been developed to support the sustainable development of human society (; ; ; ). Electrocatalysis of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has been regarded as one of the important reactions for the conversion and storage technologies (; ; ; ). However, OER is a multi-step and four-electron reaction: 4OH− (aq) → O2 (g) + 2H2O (l) + 4e–. Therefore, the kinetics are extremely sluggish, and large overpotentials are required to activate the reaction. In this case, high-activity electrocatalysts are required to overcome reaction barriers (; ; ; ). Until now, the precious metals are still considered the typical OER catalysts. However, their widespread use is limited due to their low stability, excessive scarcity, and expensive cost (; ; ; ). Consequently, it is vital to increase the efficiency and economics of OER electrocatalysts, hence supporting the growth of green energy (; ; ). Generally, high-performance electrocatalysts should possess high conductivity, efficient proton transportability, long-term stability, and a high concentration of active sites. Modest adsorption free energy of OER reactive intermediates on the surface is particularly critical for improving the intrinsic activity of electrocatalysts (; ).
Among several types of recently emerging functional materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a special type of crystalline porous materials have attracted immense attention for catalysis, owing to their enormous specific surface area and tunable pore dimensions (; ; ; ; ; ; ). While the MOFs have shown significant promise for electrochemical applications (; ; ; ; ), the majority of them exhibit low electrical conductivity, severely limiting their electrocatalytic behavior and practical application as electrocatalysts (; ). While subjecting the MOFs to heat-treatment activation, the carbonization process can achieve good electrical conductivity but simultaneously cause absolute collapse of the well-defined pore/channel structures, thus transforming the active metal sites into the agglomerate phases and losing the pristine superiority. Recently, conductive MOFs have been proposed to exhibit superiority in both rapid charge transport (such as ligand–ligand π–π stacking) and high charge density (large concentration of charge carriers given by the loosely connected high-energy electrons from the metal nodes) (; ; ; ). Due to the favorable properties of charge transfer, the conductive MOFs show the advantage of catalysis over the traditional MOFs for electrochemical reactions. However, the pristine single-metal conductive MOFs contain just a few redox-active centers, resulting in suboptimal electrocatalytic activity and stability. Therefore, the performance of pristine conductive MOFs is still far away from the commercial catalysts (). According to the previously reported works, bimetallic conductive MOFs displayed superior electrochemical property to the single-metal counterpart by tuning the conductivity, electronic structure, and absorption/desorption behaviors of intermediates (Zou et al., 2019; ; ). Thus, incorporating different metal nodes into the frameworks to form bimetallic MOFs is a significant strategy for improving the catalytic activity of conductive MOFs (). Recently, bimetallic systems have already demonstrated higher catalytic activity than monometallic counterparts, owing to their inherent properties (; ; ). It is reported that the conductive MOFs containing Co and Ni sites displayed superior ORR activity compared to their monometallic counterparts (only Co site or only Ni site) (). If loading a small amount of Fe into Ni-MOF-74, it required a lower overpotential and showed better OER activity, paving the way for the advancement of MOF-based electrocatalysts for direct employment (). In this work, we make use of Rh to improve the electrochemical OER activity of Ni-based conductive MOFs.
2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) is a typical triphenylene-based organic ligand, with an abundance of functional -OH groups, which can be coordinated with metal atoms to form 2D planar π-conjugated MOFs. Due to the charge delocalization and orbital overlap between the metal node and organic linker, this kind of MOFs are characterized with intrinsic conductivity and can be directly used as the electrocatalyst without pyrolysis activation. Herein, we have designed and synthesized Ni–Rh-based bimetallic conductive MOFs [(NixRhy)3(HHTP)2]n/CC using a simple one-step solvothermal method. Since the conductive MOFs were in situ securely grown on carbon cloth, the conductivity was greatly improved, and the electrochemical impedance was substantially reduced (; ). It was discovered that the OER performance of [(NixRhy)3(HHTP)2]n/CC was highly dependent on the Ni/Rh molar ratio. The optimized [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC showed the highest OER activity, with a low overpotential of 320 mV at the current density of 20 mA cm-2, similar to that of commercial RuO2/CC. The synergistic effect of Rh and Ni in [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC efficiently modulated the electronic state distribution of the two central metal atoms, hence altering the adsorption characteristics of oxygenous intermediates and improving the electrocatalytic activity and stability of OER.
2 Experimental
Pretreatment of carbon cloth: The carbon cloth (0.5 cm × 2 cm) was soaked in concentrated nitric acid for 24 h and then washed with deionized water until neutral. Subsequently, the carbon cloth samples were dried overnight in vacuum state at 60°C.
Synthesis of [Ni3HHTP2]n/CC: Cobalt acetate (Ni(OAc)2·4H2O, 13 mg) and hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP, 9.8 mg) were dissolved in 1.8 mL solution (deionized water: DMF = 5:1, v/v), followed by sonicating for 30 min. Afterward, the washed carbon cloth was put into the aforementioned solution. The reaction mixture was sealed into an autoclave, heated to 85°C, and maintained at this temperature for 12 h. After the autoclave was cooled down, the obtained carbon cloth was treated with deionized water and then freeze-dried for 24 h.
Synthesis of [NixRhy(HHTP)2]n/CC and [NixRhy(HHTP)2]n powder: For the synthesis of [NixRhy(HHTP)2]/CC, 0.7 mg/mL of rhodium acetate [Rh(OAc)2] solution was prepared ahead of time and mixed into Ni(OAc)2 and HHTP solution, according to the set ratio. Three different ratios of Ni/Rh were considered, the dosages of which are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The synthetic steps of [NixRhy(HHTP)2]n powders were similar to those for [NixRhy(HHTP)2]n/CC except without carbon cloth.
Preparation of RuO2/CC: The RuO2 dispersion solution was prepared by adding 20 μL of 5% Nafion solution and 4 mg RuO2 into 780 μL of mixed solution (H2O: ethanol = 1:1, v/v). Next, the RuO2 dispersion solution was drop-coated onto a 0.5 cm × 2 cm carbon cloth. After this step, the obtained carbon cloth with set RuO2 loading was dried overnight at 60°C.
Measurements: The phase composition of the sample was characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Shimadzu XRD-6100 (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å). The morphologies of samples were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, Japan), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) depictions were obtained using a Zeiss_Supra55 electron microscope. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was conducted in the range of 4,000–400 cm-1 on a Thermo Nicolet iS10 spectrometer. JEOL JEM 2100F was used for HRTEM and mapping. Raman spectra were recorded using HORIBA HR800 series.
Electrochemical characterizations: Electrochemical measurements were investigated using the electrochemical potentiostat (CHI 760E, Chenhua Instrument Company) in 0.1 M KOH at room temperature. The carbon cloth with the in situ grown catalyst was used as the working electrode directly. In addition, the platinum wire and the saturated calomel electrode were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. All polarization curves were performed by linear voltammetric scan at a sweep rate of 5 mV s-1 and were iR-corrected. All potentials can be converted concerning the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), based on the following Nernst equation: E(vs. RHE) = ERef + 0.059*13 + ETest. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) test was conducted on the working electrodes with an overpotential of 0.2 V, a frequency range of 0.01 ∼ 105 Hz, and an amplitude of 5.0 mV.
3 Results and discussion
The Ni–Rh-based bimetallic conductive MOF [(NixRhy)3(HHTP)2]n could be properly designed and synthesized with the one-step solvothermal method, which is schematically demonstrated in Scheme 1. During the solvothermal reaction process, the metallic ions could be coordinated by the ligands to fabricate a framework of long-range order. The chemical coordination and 3D structural modulation of Ni–Rh-based conductive MOF are displayed in Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure S1, respectively. The long-range-ordered planar structure enhances the structural integrity, and the typical p–p/p–d orbital overlaps impart the material with excellent electron transport capability. Because in situ growth process efficiently bonded these [NixRhy(HHTP)2]n MOFs to the backbone of the carbon cloth, they can be directly used as the OER electrodes. Differing from the smooth surface of the original carbon cloth (Supplementary Figures S2A, B), the surface of the manufactured material [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC displayed a homogeneous distribution of regular nanorods (Supplementary Figures S2C, D). However, when additional Rh was doped, the rod-like morphology of the resultant MOF crystals became irregular (Figure 1B and Supplementary Figures S2E–H). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images in Figure 1C showed that [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC had an irregular structure, suggesting that the doping of Rh had disrupted the process of crystallization and changed the rod-like morphology. As shown in Figure 1D, no hetero-structural phases existed, but a typical MOF morphology was observed in the view. Moreover, elemental mappings using the annular dark-field image corroborated the presence of C, O, Ni, and Rh, and these elements were distributed uniformly across the whole [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC surfaces (Figure 1E). These results indicated that the metal elements were successfully bonded with the ligands in the conductive MOFs.
SCHEME 1
FIGURE 1
XRD was used to determine the phase and structure of [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC and [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC samples, as shown in Figure 2A. The results revealed that Rh doping did not appreciably alter the phase compositions and maintain the same crystal structure. In contrast, when Rh concentration increased gradually, the corresponding intensities of the XRD characteristic peak decreased significantly, implying that Rh replaced part of Ni to coordinate with HHTP, disturbing to a certain extent the structure of the MOFs (Supplementary Figure S3). After Rh doping, the functional groups contained in the samples remained intact, according to FT-IR (Supplementary Figure S4). The Raman spectra (Figure 2B) exhibited two wide peaks at ∼1,350 and ∼1,680 cm-1, which corresponded to the D and G peaks of the carbon material, respectively. The ID/IG ratios obtained for [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC and [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC were 0.756 and 0.77, respectively, indicating that both [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC and [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC displayed the similar graphitized structure. This is because the graphitized structure is mainly ascribed to the carbon cloth, and the solvothermal reaction did not influence the property of the carbon cloth.
FIGURE 2
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was adopted to investigate the surface chemistry and valence state within the prepared samples. The survey spectra of [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC (Supplementary Figure S5) displayed several obvious peaks assigned to C, O, Ni, and Rh. The high-resolution C 1s spectrum of [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC can be fitted into two characteristic peaks located at 284.6 eV and 286 eV, corresponding to C-O and C=C species, respectively (Figure 2C). Additionally, O-Ni/Rh (531.6 eV) and C–O (533 eV) were observed in the O 1s spectrum (Figure 2D), indicating that the ligand was successfully coordinated with Ni/Rh. These two characteristic peaks indicated the existence of the HHTP ligand, which was bound to the metal sites to form an ordered frame structure. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, the coordination effect in the plane led to the generation of π-conjugate structures, which can reinforce the electron-transferring capability and therefore improve the catalytic performance (). The high-resolution Ni 2p spectrum (Figure 2E) demonstrated the typical characteristic peaks at the binding energies of 874 and 856 eV, which corresponded to Ni(II) 2p1/2 and Ni(II) 2p3/2, respectively, indicating the existence of Ni with a single valence state (). The broader peaks located at 880 and 862 eV were assigned to the satellite peaks. In the high-resolution Rh 3d spectrum (Figure 2F), the two peaks at 314.7 and 310 eV correspond to Rh3+ 3d3/2 and Rh3+ 3d5/2, respectively, indicating that Rh existed in an trivalent form (). In combination with the results of XRD, it was proved that the [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC sample has pure phase composition, without the formation of other heterogeneous phases (; ; ).
The electrocatalytic activity of as-prepared conductive MOF electrocatalysts for OER was investigated in 0.1 M KOH solution using a typical three-electrode system. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of the MOF samples with various Rh doping concentrations are shown in Figure 3A. We can find that the moderate doping of Rh might alter the electrochemical properties of [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC and therefore accelerate the OER process. However, excessive doping of Rh resulted in decreased OER activity, which was ascribed to the structure collapse and consequent conductivity attenuation of the conductive MOFs. [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC displayed the lowest potential of 1.55 V at 20 mA cm−2 compared to its single-metal counterpart (1.63 V for [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC) or other bimetallic conductive MOFs with different metal ratios (1.61 V for [Ni2.94Rh0.06(HHTP)2]n/CC and 1.6 V for [Ni2.7Rh0.3(HHTP)2]n/CC). It is noteworthy that the additional peak of 1.4 V, as shown in Figure 3A, was caused by the oxidation of Ni2+. It was agreeable to see in Supplementary Figure S6 that the bimetallic conductive MOFs of [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC displayed an excellent OER activity, even similar to that of RuO2/CC in terms of the potential at 20 mA cm−2, under the same mass loading of 0.825 mg. In addition, there was very poor electrocatalytic activity on the blank carbon cloth, implying that the excellent electrocatalytic performance was derived only from conductive bimetallic MOFs [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC (). To further investigate the reaction kinetics, the corresponding Tafel slopes were analyzed. As shown in Figure 3B, the Tafel slopes of [Ni3(HHTP)2]n/CC, [Ni2.94Rh0.06(HHTP)2]n/CC, [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC, [Ni2.7Rh0.3(HHTP)2]n/CC, and RuO2/CC were 120, 82.9, 65.6, 64, and 140 mV dec−1, respectively. This result indicated that the bimetallic MOFs achieved faster reaction kinetics than the commercial RuO2 catalysts. In order to explore the charge transfer capability at the interface of the catalyst/electrolyte, the EIS test was performed. The Nyquist plots for different catalysts are provided in Figure 3C, in which the inset shows an equivalent circuit model. As demonstrated in Figure 3C, the Rh-doped MOFs exhibited much smaller charge transfer resistance (Rct) than the undoped [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC, indicating the doped Rh in favor of charge transfer during the OER process. In addition to the activity, long-term stability was another key concern for the practical application of electrocatalysts. Therefore, a chronoamperometry (I-t plot) response was performed at the constant potential of 1.6 V in 0.1 M KOH solution to assess the OER stability. Figure 3D shows that the [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC catalyst retained 86% of the initial current density after 45,000 s, which is larger than that of 79% for RuO2/CC, manifesting a better stability of [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC.
FIGURE 3
4 Conclusion
In summary, the conductive MOFs [Ni2.85Rh0.15(HHTP)2]n/CC were successfully synthesized with a simple solvothermal method. The obtained conductive MOF showed prominent OER activity comparable to RuO2/CC and outperformed RuO2/CC in terms of long-term stability. The remarkable activity could be attributed to the abundant active metallic sites in the MOFs, which are in favor of reactant adsorption and activation. The porous morphology leads to high-efficient mass transfer and ion penetration. In addition, the conductive characteristics of the MOFs facilitate charge transfer during the OER. The multi-aspect merits synergistically improve the electrocatalytic activity. Therefore, this work provides a facile method to synthesize the bimetallic conductive MOFs, being directly used as the efficient OER electrocatalysts.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SZ: writing—original draft. HZ: data curation. TZ: methodology. MZ: visualization. LS: writing—review and editing and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210651). Meanwhile, this work was supported by the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Jiangsu Joint Laboratory of Atmospheric Pollution Control, and Jiangsu Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Cleaning Materials. LS was supported by the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor TW declared a past co-authorship with the author LS.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1242672/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AliA.AkyüzD.AsgharM. A.KocaA.KeskinB. (2018). Free-standing carbon nanotubes as non-metal electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction in water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy43, 1123–1128. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.060
2
BezerraL. S.MaiaG. (2020). Developing efficient catalysts for the OER and ORR using a combination of Co, Ni, and Pt oxides along with graphene nanoribbons and NiCo2O4. J. Mat. Chem. A8, 17691–17705. 10.1039/D0TA05908K
3
CaoC.MaD.XuQ.WuX.ZhuQ. (2019). Semisacrificial template growth of self‐supporting MOF nanocomposite electrode for efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation. Adv. Funct. Mat.29, 1807418. 10.1002/adfm.201807418
4
ChenT.DouJ.YangL.SunC.LibrettoN.SkorupskiiG.et al (2020). Continuous electrical conductivity variation in M3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2 (M= Co, Ni, Cu) MOF alloys. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 12367–12373. 10.1021/jacs.0c04458
5
ChuS.MajumdarA. (2012). Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature488, 294–303. 10.1038/nature11475
6
CookT. R.DogutanD. K.ReeceS. Y.SurendranathY.TeetsT. S.NoceraD. G. (2010). Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem. Rev.110, 6474–6502. 10.1021/cr100246c
7
DingJ.SunW.WeiG.SuZ. (2015). Cuprous oxide microspheres on graphene nanosheets: an enhanced material for non-enzymatic electrochemical detection of H2O2 and glucose. RSC Adv.5, 35338–35345. 10.1039/C5RA04164C
8
FuJ.CanoZ. P.ParkM. G.YuA.FowlerM.ChenZ. (2017). Electrically rechargeable zinc-air batteries: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Adv. Mat.29, 1604685. 10.1002/adma.201604685
9
FurukawaH.CordovaK. E.O’KeeffeM.YaghiO. M. (2013). The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science341, 1230444. 10.1126/science.1230444
10
GaoZ.YuZ. W.LiuF. Q.YuY.SuX. M.WangL.et al (2019). Ultralow-content iron-decorated Ni-MOF-74 fabricated by a metal–organic framework surface reaction for efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation. Inorg. Chem.58, 11500–11507. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01301
11
García-GarcíaP.MüllerM.CormaA. (2014). MOF catalysis in relation to their homogeneous counterparts and conventional solid catalysts. Chem. Sci.5, 2979. 10.1039/c4sc00265b
12
Giménez-MarquésM.Santiago-PortilloA.NavalónS.ÁlvaroM.BrioisV.NouarF.et al (2019). Exploring the catalytic performance of a series of bimetallic MIL-100(Fe, Ni) MOFs. J. Mat. Chem. A7, 20285–20292. 10.1039/C9TA01948K
13
GrimaudA.Diaz-MoralesO.HanB.HongW. T.LeeY.-L.GiordanoL.et al (2017). Activating lattice oxygen redox reactions in metal oxides to catalyse oxygen evolution. Nat. Chem.9, 457–465. 10.1038/nchem.2695
14
GuanB. Y.YuX. Y.WuH. B.LouX. W. (2017). Complex nanostructures from materials based on metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mat.29, 1703614. 10.1002/adma.201703614
15
GuoJ.LiY.ChengY.DaiL.XiangZ. (2017). Highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts synthesized under nanospace confinement of metal–organic framework. ACS Nano11, 8379–8386. 10.1021/acsnano.7b03807
16
GuoY.FengL.WuC.WangX.ZhangX. (2019). Synthesis of 3D-ordered macro/microporous yolk–shelled nanoreactor with spatially separated functionalities for cascade reaction. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces11, 33978–33986. 10.1021/acsami.9b11578
17
HuC.DaiL. (2016). Carbon-based metal-free catalysts for electrocatalysis beyond the ORR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 11736–11758. 10.1002/anie.201509982
18
HuangK.GuoS.WangR.LinS.HussainN.WeiH.et al (2020). Two-dimensional MOF/MOF derivative arrays on nickel foam as efficient bifunctional coupled oxygen electrodes. Chin. J. Catal.41, 1754–1760. 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63613-0
19
HunterB. M.GrayH. B.MüllerA. M. (2016). Earth-abundant heterogeneous water oxidation catalysts. Chem. Rev.116, 14120–14136. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00398
20
JahanM.BaoQ.LohK. P. (2012). Electrocatalytically active graphene–porphyrin MOF composite for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 6707–6713. 10.1021/ja211433h
21
KimH.AbdalaA. A.MacoskoC. W. (2010). Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules43, 6515–6530. 10.1021/ma100572e
22
LiC.ZhangL.ChenJ.LiX.SunJ.ZhuJ.et al (2021a). Recent development and applications of electrical conductive MOFs. Nanoscale13, 485–509. 10.1039/D0NR06396G
23
LiJ.LiuP.MaoJ.YanaJ.SongW. (2021b). Structural and electronic modulation of conductive MOFs for efficient oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. J. Mat. Chem. A9, 11248–11254. 10.1039/D1TA01970H
24
MaZ.ZhangQ.ZhuW.KhanD.HuC.HuangT.et al (2020). Nano Fe and Mg2Ni derived from TMA-TM (TM=Fe, Ni) MOFs as synergetic catalysts for hydrogen storage in MgH2. Sustain. Energy Fuels4, 2192–2200. 10.1039/D0SE00081G
25
MotoyamaS.MakiuraR.SakataO.KitagawaH. (2011). Highly crystalline nanofilm by layering of porphyrin Metal−Organic framework sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 5640–5643. 10.1021/ja110720f
26
PanJ.WangB.WangJ.DingH.ZhouW.LiuX.et al (2021). Activity and stability boosting of oxygen-vacancy-rich BiVO4 photoanode by NiFe-MOFs thin layer for water oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 1433–1440. 10.1002/anie.202012550
27
PanN.ZhangH.YangB.QiuH.LiL.SongL.et al (2020). Conductive MOFs as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for all-solid-state Zn–air batteries. Chem. Commun.56, 13615–13618. 10.1039/D0CC05569G
28
ParkJ.LeeM.FengD.HuangZ.HinckleyA. C.YakovenkoA.et al (2018). Stabilization of hexaaminobenzene in a 2D conductive metal–organic framework for high power sodium storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 10315–10323. 10.1021/jacs.8b06020
29
QiL.SuY.-Q.XuZ.ZhangG.LiuK.LiuM.et al (2020). Hierarchical 2D yarn-ball like metal–organic framework NiFe(dobpdc) as bifunctional electrocatalyst for efficient overall electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Mat. Chem. A8, 22974–22982. 10.1039/D0TA08094B
30
RogerI.ShipmanM. A.SymesM. D. (2017). Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Rev. Chem.1, 0003. 10.1038/s41570-016-0003
31
SehZ. W.KibsgaardJ.DickensC. F.ChorkendorffI.NørskovJ. K.JaramilloT. F. (2017). Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science355, eaad4998. 10.1126/science.aad4998
32
ShenK.ChenX.ChenJ.LiY. (2016). Development of MOF-derived carbon-based nanomaterials for efficient catalysis. ACS Catal.6, 5887–5903. 10.1021/acscatal.6b01222
33
SuenN.-T.HungS.-F.QuanQ.ZhangN.XuY.-J.ChenH. M. (2017). Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: Recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 337–365. 10.1039/C6CS00328A
34
SzczęśniakB.ChomaJ.JaroniecM. (2018). Gas adsorption properties of hybrid graphene-MOF materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci.514, 801–813. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.049
35
TahirM.PanL.IdreesF.ZhangX.WangL.ZouJ.-J.et al (2017). Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction for energy conversion and storage: A comprehensive review. Nano Energy37, 136–157. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.022
36
TaoZ.WangT.WangX.ZhengJ.LiX. (2016). MOF-derived noble metal free catalysts for electrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces8, 35390–35397. 10.1021/acsami.6b13411
37
WangH.YinF.ChenB.LiG. (2015). Synthesis of an ε-MnO2/metal-organic-framework composite and its electrocatalysis towards oxygen reduction reaction in an alkaline electrolyte. J. Mat. Chem. A3, 16168–16176. 10.1039/C5TA02244D
38
WangW.AndersonC. F.WangZ.WuW.CuiH.LiuC.-J. (2017). Peptide-templated noble metal catalysts: syntheses and applications. Chem. Sci.8, 3310–3324. 10.1039/C7SC00069C
39
XiaB. Y.YanY.LiN.WuH. B.LouX. W.WangX. (2016). A metal–organic framework-derived bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst. Nat. Energy1, 15006. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.6
40
XuZ.WangQ.ZhangsunH.ZhaoS.ZhaoY.WangL. (2021). Carbon cloth-supported nanorod-like conductive Ni/Co bimetal MOF: A stable and high-performance enzyme-free electrochemical sensor for determination of glucose in serum and beverage. Food Chem.349, 129202. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129202
41
YangX.PachfuleP.ChenY.TsumoriN.XuQ. (2016). Highly efficient hydrogen generation from formic acid using a reduced graphene oxide-supported AuPd nanoparticle catalyst. Chem. Commun.52, 4171–4174. 10.1039/C5CC10311H
42
YangX.XuQ. (2017). Bimetallic metal–organic frameworks for gas storage and separation. Cryst. Growth Des.17, 1450–1455. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00166
43
YaqoobL.NoorT.IqbalN.NasirH.ZamanN.TalhaK. (2021). Electrochemical synergies of Fe–Ni bimetallic MOF CNTs catalyst for OER in water splitting. J. Alloys Compd.850, 156583. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156583
44
YoonH.LeeS.OhS.ParkH.ChoiS.OhM. (2019). Synthesis of bimetallic conductive 2D metal–organic framework (CoxNiy-CAT) and its mass production: Enhanced electrochemical oxygen reduction activity. Small15, 1805232. 10.1002/smll.201805232
45
YouB.SunY. (2018). Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Acc. Chem. Res.51, 1571–1580. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002
46
ZhangP.ZhangX.ZhangS.LuX.LiQ.SuZ.et al (2013). One-pot green synthesis, characterizations, and biosensor application of self-assembled reduced graphene oxide–gold nanoparticle hybrid membranes. J. Mat. Chem. B1, 6525. 10.1039/c3tb21270j
47
ZhangT.ZhengB.LiL.SongJ.SongL.ZhangM. (2021). Fewer-layer conductive metal-organic Langmuir-Blodgett films as electrocatalysts enable an ultralow detection limit of H2O2. Appl. Surf. Sci.539, 148255. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148255
48
ZhangX.LuoJ.TangP.YeX.PengX.TangH.et al (2017). A universal strategy for metal oxide anchored and binder-free carbon matrix electrode: A supercapacitor case with superior rate performance and high mass loading. Nano Energy31, 311–321. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.024
49
ZhaoS.WangY.DongJ.HeC.-T.YinH.AnP.et al (2016). Ultrathin metal–organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nat. Energy1, 16184. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
50
ZouZ.WangT.ZhaoX.JiangW.-J.PanH.GaoD.et al (2019). Expediting in-situ electrochemical activation of two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks for enhanced OER intrinsic activity by iron incorporation. ACS Catal.9, 7356–7364. 10.1021/acscatal.9b00072
Summary
Keywords
conductive metal–organic framework, active site, in situ growth, synergistic effect, oxygen evolution reaction
Citation
Zu S, Zhang H, Zhang T, Zhang M and Song L (2023) Ni–Rh-based bimetallic conductive MOF as a high-performance electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Front. Chem. 11:1242672. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1242672
Received
19 June 2023
Accepted
22 August 2023
Published
29 September 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Tao Wang, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
Reviewed by
Jun Wang, Nanjing Tech University, China
Yuanhua Sang, Shandong University, China
Xianguang Meng, North China University of Science and Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zu, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang and Song.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Li Song, songli@nuist.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.