REVIEW article

Front. Chem., 12 June 2025

Sec. Analytical Chemistry

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1568867

A systematic review of sensors to combat crime and routes to further sensor development

  • 1. DAWES Centre for Future Crime at UCL, Jill Dando Institute for Security and Crime Science, London, United Kingdom

  • 2. Institute for Materials Discovery, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom

  • 3. Department of Chemistry, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Article metrics

View details

2

Citations

6,4k

Views

1,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Forensic science plays an important part in crime reduction but faces many challenges. These include the validity, cost and complexity of current sensors used, and a reliance on trained professionals to conduct analyses. Recent advances in sensor technologies present a promising opportunity for rapid, decentralized, and cost-effective analysis by untrained individuals in the field. To date, a comprehensive systematic review covering sensing technologies and use cases has been lacking. This paper addresses that gap. After the initial screening of papers, 1,482 publications were included in the review, from which data on target analytes and sensing technologies were extracted. Given that law enforcement have limited resources, a second screening examined papers that focused on low-cost sensing devices published from 2020 onwards (N = 791). Overall, our review identified eleven key analyte categories that had been researched: illicit drugs, fingerprints, explosives, body fluids, food safety, poisons and toxins, pollutants, counterfeits and documentation, fire, gunshot, and others. Low-cost sensing technologies identified were categorised into electrochemical, colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and SERS. We review trends in the research reported, barriers to commercialisation and adoption, and review the use of these types of sensors by law enforcement agencies. Current sensors used by authorities face challenges of high costs, specificity issues, limited detection capabilities and complex sample preparation. Emerging research focuses on cost-effective printed electrodes and dual detection techniques to enhance analyte sensitivity and detection accuracy. Notably, body fluid analysis plays a crucial role in criminal cases, but current sensors suffer issues like false positives, DNA degradation, and high costs. Studies investigating eco-friendly materials and dual-detection approaches show promise in addressing these issues. Illicit drug analysis constitutes over one-third (36%) of included publications. In the UK, police rely on NIK tests and DrugWipe sensors for on-site drug detection, but challenges related to sensitivity, specificity, and confirmatory testing persist. Ongoing research explores dual detection methods, lateral flow immunoassays, and electro-chemiluminescent screening to enhance specificity and matrix tolerance. Future efforts should prioritise refining dual detection methods, reducing matrix interference, low-cost/eco-friendly materials and fostering collaboration between academia and law enforcement for effective implementation in these areas.

1 Introduction

Forensic science plays an important role in the detection and prosecution of crime. It draws on a variety of scientific disciplines and approaches (Bollella and Katz, 2020; Pereira de Oliveira et al., 2018), and can involve the analysis of biological fluids, illicit drug samples, gunshot residues and so on. While valuable, traditional technologies presently employed have problems to include damaging effects on DNA retrieval, unacceptable specificity, and the inability to perform concurrent analyses as part of a multiplex assay (Gooch et al., 2014). The utilisation of sensors, particularly biosensors, represents a considerable opportunity (Singh et al., 2014). Numerous forensic analysis methods use presumptive analysis (i.e., they are not confirmatory) and necessitate collected samples to be centrally analysed in a laboratory to meet evidential requirements. However, sensors may enable untrained persons to undertake rapid, decentralised (and less expensive) analyses of complex samples in the field (Bollella and Katz, 2020). Biosensors have been well developed in the healthcare sector, food and beverage industries and environmental monitoring fields (Chadha et al., 2022). However, even though their use may offer sensitive, user-friendly, selective and rapid on-site tools for analysis, in the context of forensic science, biosensors are relatively under-developed (Aydindogan et al., 2019; Geng et al., 2017; Yáñez-Sedeño et al., 2019).

In this article, we report a systematic review to take stock of the current uses of biosensors and to identify key areas for future research. We begin by explaining why sensors are important in this context and specify what defines a sensor and the key elements of the sensor we will be focussing on (target analytes and sensing technologies). We then discuss the approach taken to review the literature, detailing why a systematic approach was taken, present our findings, and then make suggestions for future work.

1.1 Investigating crime

To detect and investigate crime, illegal behaviour must be identified, and an understanding and reconstruction of the crime event possible. To do this, for many forms of crime, a coherent analysis of physical and other evidence is needed. This is termed forensic science (Chisum and Turvey, 2011). Recent legal and scientific advances have emphasised concerns over the validity of inferences and techniques used in forensic science. Validity is crucial as scientific inaccuracies have consequences for the criminal justice system, crime reduction and society. The reconstruction of a crime relies strongly on Locard’s Exchange Principle, that every contact leaves a trace (Locard, 1920). Other situations necessitate on-site detection at the time of a crime; for instance, roadside drug testing mandates that a trace of drug sample be identified immediately. Therefore, methods for analysis and identification of these traces are needed. Sensors are utilised already in many scenarios dealing with traces (target analytes) to detect crime. However, improved validity and increased capacity are needed. Sensors may help to deliver both.

1.2 Sensors

A sensor is defined as “a device which detects and measures a physical property and records, indicates, or otherwise responds to it” (Soanes and Stevenson, 2008). This can be anything from thermometers, accelerometer sensors to alcohol sensors.

1.2.1 Biosensors

Due to recent advances in their development, one branch of sensors that is of particular importance to combating crime are biosensors (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018). Developments are mainly due to the utilisation of new nanomaterials and nanostructured devices (Harish et al., 2022), developments in microfabrication and miniaturisation technologies (Baracu and Gugoasa, 2021), new bio-recognition molecules (Bazin et al., 2017) and improved collaboration between life- and physical-scientists (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018).

Biosensor design incorporates three main stages. First, the biosensor must identify a specific analyte using a specific recognition component (bioreceptor–e.g., nuclei acids, proteins or other biological structures) that binds to the target analyte (Weetall, 1996). Bioreceptors are immobilized on a transducer surface to ensure specific detection. Novel bioreceptors are currently under development to replace traditional antibody-based methods. Notably, aptamers—such as peptide aptamers and oligonucleotide aptamers, comprised of single-stranded DNA or RNA—are emerging as promising alternatives (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018).

Second, the biological binding event must be converted into a physicochemical signal. Transducers translate this biological signal into a quantifiable one, which can be mechanical (force, pressure, displacement, acceleration), optical (light intensity, refractive index) or electrical (current, potential). Once transduced the signal can be processed (filtering, amplification) and transformed into pertinent chemical data (the third stage in the process).

1.3 Target analytes

An analyte is a substance whose chemical constituents are to be identified or measured (Soanes and Stevenson, 2008). Understanding current and future sensor applications for crime reduction requires identifying typical target analytes. This systematic review will categorize common analytes, including illicit drugs, fingerprints, and body fluids. For instance, sensors that detect blood stains at crime scenes can provide evidence such as blood type, DNA, and links to suspects or victims. Fast, low-cost, and reliable sensors are essential, and with advancements in technology comes the ability to detect a greater number of target analytes in smaller quantities (Gove and Durini, 2014).

1.4 Sensing technologies

Once target analytes are identified, suitable sensing technologies must be determined. Lab-based technologies include mass spectrometry using analysis of mass-to-charge-ratios (Gross, 2017), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA amplification (Hue-Roye and Vege, 2008) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for rapid component separation (Kazakevich and Lobrutto, 2007).

Portable, lower cost technologies include electrochemical, colorimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and surface-enhance Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Electrochemical sensors use a recognition element coupled to an electrochemical transducer to give information about chemical composition (Yáñez-Sedeño et al., 2019). Voltammetry, a common electrochemical method, provides advantages over other electrochemical detection methods in portability (Ribeiro et al., 2020), matrix tolerance (Haghighi et al., 2020) and tolerance against potential interferents (Grothe et al., 2021). Colorimetric sensors utilise a specific indicator or reagent that reacts selectively with the target analyte providing a colour change for identification (Suslick et al., 2004). Immunoassays use antibodies or antigens to measure analyte presence or concentration (Diamandis and Christopoulos, 1996). Luminescence, including fluorescence, phosphorescence and chemiluminescence, uses characteristics such as intensity, wavelength and duration of emitted light to provide information about the target analyte (Holliday, 2016). Raman spectroscopy uses the interaction of molecular vibrations with light to provide non-destructive information about crystallinity, chemical structure and molecular interactions (Long, 1977). SERS enhances Raman scattering of molecules when they are adsorbed on or near to a SERS-active surface including nanostructures made from gold or silver (Xiu et al., 2021).

1.4.1 Nanomaterials

Nanomaterials are essential for advancing diagnostic technologies, offering tailored properties in biomaterials (Bollella and Katz, 2020; Kim, 2017). Defined as substances with at least one dimension in the nanometer range (10−9 m), their small size confers unique properties attracting significant research interest due to their low cost (limited materials usage) and uniquely size-dependent properties (Amiri et al., 2021). Recent studies emphasize the role of nanomaterial-based biosensors, especially in electrochemical technologies, in enhancing portable devices by improving biocompatibility, stability, surface energy, and signal amplification (Su et al., 2017). Nano-coatings have also advanced bioreceptor immobilization, preventing non-specific binding (Bhalla et al., 2016). These developments address demands for biosensors with enhanced selectivity, sensitivity, rapid response and low cost (Su et al., 2017). Therefore, future research on crime reducing sensors will likely focus on nanomaterial-based biosensors.

1.5 Low-cost, on-site and performance

To date, devices have been costly and used complex methods which require an expert to undertake analyses. However, given budget constraints in policing and the ubiquity of some problems (e.g., drug driving), the next-generation of sensing devices will increasingly need to prioritise optimal performance during usage and post-storage, as well as being user-friendly and affordable (both in operation and production) (Weetall, 1996).

1.6 Systematic review

To understand advances in the use of sensing technologies to reduce crime and to map out a future research agenda, a systematic review (SR) was conducted. Ad hoc literature reviews present often sparse and biased coverage of an existing literature, whereas SRs are constructed to reduce bias by using transparent and systematic search approaches, enabling the extraction of as great a proportion of the existing evidence as is feasible on a subject (Cockbain et al., 2018). SRs are typically undertaken to gather evidence on “what works” in specific medicine and healthcare scenarios (Curtis and Cairncross, 2003) where data is plentiful. But SRs can also be employed for broader reviews for emerging issues (Blythe and Johnson, 2019; Elgabry et al., 2020), as is the case here.

1.7 Existing literature

Existing literature reviews on target analytes and sensing technologies for combating crime often focus on specific areas without a systematic approach. For instance, Honeychurch’s (Honeychurch, 2019) review on electroanalytical-based techniques for detecting benzodiazepines is detailed but narrow in scope, focussing on a specific analyte and sensing technology.

A 2020 special issue of Biosensors (Bollella and Katz, 2020), “The Potential of (bio)sensors for the Forensic Sciences” highlighted the potential of biosensors in forensic science. The special issue examines the crucial role biosensors can play in efficiently and accurately improving the techniques of crime detection (Bollella and Katz, 2020). However, although this review is broader in its approach than other articles, dealing with many target analytes, the sensing technology considered was limited to electrochemical biosensors.

Therefore, a wider scoped review of analytes and sensing technologies to reduce crime is of clear value to capitalise on recent advances in other sectors (

Parkhey and Mohan, 2018

). As far as we are aware, this is the first systematic review to scope all potential target analytes and sensing technologies of a sensor for combating crime. The overarching aims of the review are to understand:

  • 1. What analytes are targeted in sensors for combating crime?

  • 2. What sensing technologies have been used to combat crime?

  • 3. What are the most recent directions of on-site and low-cost sensing devices?

  • 4. What are the possible future avenues for further research?

2 Methodology and design

A SR protocol, developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines (Shamseer et al., 2015), defined the scope of the review and the search strategy (see below). The protocol and search query were reviewed by an academic librarian with expertise in systematic reviews and updated in response to feedback.

2.1 Information sources

Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) identified principle academic search systems used in SRs. Of those identified, the most suitable were: ProQuest, PubMed and Web of Science. Searches focused on the title, abstract and keywords of articles, along with the field tag used (noft, Ti/Ab and TS respectively).

In addition, to find articles that may be missed by this search strategy, a chain citation technique (backward search) and the snowballing (forward search) of key studies identified was used (Cribbin, 2011).

2.2 Search query

To locate articles, a search query was refined, comprising two components: a sensing device concept and a criminal application concept. Before conducting the search, search terms were piloted and refined to achieve a balance between sensitivity (retrieving a high proportion of relevant articles), and precision (retrieving a low proportion of irrelevant articles). Relevant terms and synonyms were used to facilitate a systematic search.

  • Concept 1:

biosens* OR biomaterial* OR nanomaterial* OR nanoparticle* OR nanotechnolog* OR biotechnology* OR sensor*

  • Concept 2:

crime* OR criminal* OR offend* OR forensic* OR terror* OR illegal* OR illicit* OR unlawful*

Where the truncation character (*) retrieves variations of the search term, for example, crime* returns articles that include the term crime and crimes.

2.3 Eligibility criteria

The exclusion and inclusion criteria used to sift articles followed the PICOS format (Methley et al., 2014) and were applied at both the title and abstract, and full-text screening stages. The PICOS criteria used were:

Population (P): In contrast to medical studies, the population was less critical. Articles from the last 8 years (13/05/2016–13/05/2023) were considered, as older publications were less likely to be relevant due to rapid advances in sensing technology.

Interventions (I): Included articles focused on current or potential future uses of chemical and biochemical sensing devices to combat crime. Studies on other (sensing) technologies, such as new or emerging computer technologies (e.g., wireless sensor networks, IoT, machine learning), image and sound processing and those examining cyber or data security were excluded.

Outcomes (O): Measured whether the sensing technology could detect a specific target analyte.

Study Types (S): Included peer-reviewed journal articles, government or official documents (legal documents), and academic theses. Excluded were commentaries, books/book reviews, opinions, and working papers. Studies had to be written in English language and journal articles peer-reviewed, with the latter ensuring publications were of sufficient quality (Koshy et al., 2018).

2.4 Study selection

In stage 1, titles and abstracts were screened using the PICOS criteria and the EPPI-Reviewer 4.0 software (Thomas et al., 2010). Figure 1 guided decision making to ensure consistency by the primary reviewer and to assist co-reviewers during an inter-rater reliability (IRR) exercise. To assess IRR, a random sample of 5% of the identified publications were assessed on title and abstract by two other reviewers. Agreement between first reviewer and co-reviewers was measured using the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistic (Elgabry et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2011) (Equation 1), yielding values of 0.81 and 0.84, indicating very good agreement. The primary reviewer subsequently screened the full text of all articles included during stage 1 of the screening process.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Schematic of the inclusion decision tree.

2.5 Data extraction and analysis

For each article, we extracted pertinent information, including study identifiers (publication year, author(s), publication type) and outcomes (target analyte, sensing technology, detection method). Following data extraction, findings were synthesised using a thematic analysis (Clarke and Braun, 2017).

2.6 Further exclusion

Following the initial systematic review and summary of core information, a more in-depth study was then performed on a sub-set of included publications. As noted in a special issue of

Biosensors

(

Bollella and Katz, 2020

) the future of evidence analysis in criminal investigations relies on the development of rapid, decentralised and low-cost testing by untrained individuals. For these reasons and because of the fast pace of research in sensing technologies, a more detailed analysis was carried out. The further eligibility criteria for the second stage were that.

  • • The publications date was on or after 01/01/2020

  • • The sensing technology was low-cost (as detailed in Section 1.4)

3 Results and discussion

In the results section, we first present findings from the initial SR screening, examining trends in publication numbers and target analytes identified over the last 8 years. Secondly, our further screening results are presented and discussed, focussing on publications from the last four and a half years that discuss low-cost sensing technologies. Publications are categorised by target analyte addressed with discussions looking at numbers of publications, sensing technologies used, and key themes identified. Current technologies used by law enforcement and local authorities are evaluated, and areas where further research could significantly impact crime reduction, based on SR results, highlighted.

3.1 Initial screening (2016-2023)

Figure 2 shows the number of articles identified, included and excluded at each review stage. The pre-defined search query resulted in 2,504 results from ProQuest, 978 from PubMed and 2,982 from Web of Science, plus 9 from backward searches and 6 from forward searches. Of the 6,479 publications initially identified, 22% were duplicates and removed. Title and abstract screening excluded 67% of the remaining publications, and full-text screening excluded another 12%. Ultimately, 1,482 publications were carried forward for analysis.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

PRISMA flowchart summarising the inclusion and exclusion steps of the systematic review performed.

There was a year-on-year increase in included publications, from 134 in 2017 to more than double that amount (Ge et al., 2020) in 2022. This growth reflects increased research and development of biosensors (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018), underscoring the need to explore their potential applications for crime reduction.

3.1.1 Eleven target analytes identified

Categorising included publications by target analytes is crucial for understanding current trends in sensing devices and enabling a more systematic analysis. Thematic analysis of the included publications identified eleven identified target analytes:

  • 1. Fire

  • 2. Gunshot

  • 3. Counterfeits and documentation

  • 4. Pollutants (e.g., adulterated fuels, industrial waste)

  • 5. Body fluids (any target analyte that could be found in body fluids e.g., seminal or vaginal fluid, salivary amylase, blood, urine, DNA)

  • 6. Explosives

  • 7. Poisons and toxins (e.g., mycotoxins, pesticides)

  • 8. Fingerprints

  • 9. Food safety (e.g., food poisoning, adulteration)

  • 10. Illicit drugs–As illicit drugs represented a large proportion of the included publications the category was further subdivided [depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, pharmaceuticals, dissociates, cannabinoids and opioids per Target Zero (Author Anonymous, 2025a) Zero1]

  • 11. Other (e.g., radioactive materials, illegal wildlife trade)

Figure 3A shows that the largest volume of included publications (36%) focussed on illicit drugs, followed by food safety (20%), fingerprints (15%) and poisons/toxins (14%). The large proportion of publications in these areas indicates strong research interest and rapid development but also reflects the broad scope of some of these categories. For example, the illicit drugs category is expansive. Additionally, Figure 3A highlights less interest and development in sensors for fire and gunshot analysis.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

(A) Trends in the percentage of publications relating to each identified target analyte from 2016 to 2023*. Noting that some publications related to multiple target analytes and therefore the total percentage is seen to sum to more than 100%. (B) Trends in percentage of different categories of illicit drug publications identified from 2017 to 2022. Noting that some publications related to multiple target drugs or were not assigned to one of the 7 drug categories and therefore the total percentage is seen not to sum 100%. [*where 2016 and 2023 are not shown as data collection was only for half of these years.].

Over the past 8 years, the proportion of publications for each target analyte has remained fairly constant (Figure 3A). However, publications on fingerprint and poison/toxin detection have decreased, while those on illicit drugs have increased, especially from 2020 to 2022, echoing a growing global concern about substance abuse (United Nations, 2023) and could thus represent an important avenue for further research.

Figure 3B shows that overall about 30% of illicit drug publications focussed on the design of sensors to detect stimulant abuse. Opioid-related publications are seen to have increased rapidly from 2019 onwards. This aligns with the rising opioid crisis and persistent stimulant misuse. According to the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), reported drug use in the US increased by 47% from 2016 to 2022 (Author Anonymous, 2025b), with 13% of Americans starting or increasing substance use to cope with COVID-19 stress (Abramson, 2021). These trends suggest the time critical nature of sensor development in illicit drug detection.

3.1.2 Sensing technologies used

Eight different types of sensing elements were identified within the included publications and were classified as high or low-cost technologies (detailed in Section 1.4). High-cost technologies, requiring expensive equipment and trained professionals, included mass spectrometry (5% of publications), PCR (1%), and HPLC (2%). Low-cost technologies, suitable for use by untrained persons, included electrochemical (27%), colorimetric (11%), immunoassay (18%), luminescence (32%), and SERS (15%).

3.2 Detailed analyses (2020-2023)

After the initial overview, a more in-depth analysis was conducted on articles published from 2020 onwards, focusing on low-cost sensing technologies due to the reasons highlighted in the methods section and the fast-pace of sensor development. A total of 590 publications were excluded as they had a publication date before 01/01/2020 and 110 were excluded due to the high-cost of the technology discussed. This left 782 publications for more detailed analysis.

High- and low-cost technologies are classified based on material costs, instrumentation complexity, expenses, and accessibility. Low-cost methods use inexpensive materials and portable equipment for on-site testing, while high-cost methods require complex preparation, advanced instruments, and specialised operators for centralised labs.

Within the high-cost publications, mass spectrometry accounted for 45% followed by HPLC for 15% (Figure 4). Although these technologies allow accurate analysis [see Chiang et al. (2019)] their expense, requirement of trained users and time intensive nature makes them unsuitable for mass-market production and irrelevant to the rest of this review.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4

Number of publications identified relating to different low-cost sensing technologies (included) and high-cost sensing technologies (excluded).

Low-cost publications comprised 88% of those identified from 2020 onwards, with luminescence and electrochemical technologies being the most prevalent (Figure 4). The literature focus on these technologies indicates that they are at the forefront of work being done in low-cost sensing development.

The subsequent sections discuss the above outlined publications, organised by target analyte (Figure 5). Tables summarise key themes identified in the included publications, categorised by sensing technology. Key themes and publications are explored further within the accompanying text to outline current technologies and potential areas for further research. Alongside the publications reviewed in the SR, an outline of the current sensing technologies used by UK police and authorities is provided. The shortfalls of these technologies are discussed, and the findings from the SR used to suggest the most promising directions for further research to address these issues.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5

Plot showing the number of publications included in the further screening review. The percentage of publications assigned to a sensing technology for each target analyte has been indicated.

3.2.1 Fire

Sensors in fire analysis detect, map and trace fire sources. Only one publication focused on fire, highlighting minimal current interest. The identified publication reviewed metal oxide (MOx) electrochemical sensors (Shalini Devi et al., 2021) for hazard-surveillance and risk investigation, including fire-hazards, chemical-warfare agents, oil-spills and explosives. MOx sensors, combined with airflow detectors and specific algorithms, have been used in mobile robots for fire analysis. These developments are made possible by novel nanoarchitectural patterns which enhance sensitivity and the possibility of multi-analyte sensing using array sensors and blended composites. The authors noted that improving thermal damage prevention, response, recovery times, and robot mobility is necessary to realize the potential of these devices.

In the UK, police and fire services collaborate on-site to determine fire causes, origins and behaviours, collecting evidence such as fire debris and electrical appliances for analysis (Cellmark, 2025a; Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service Fire Investigation FI, 2013). Central laboratories use gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify accelerants, origin and fire behaviour (Abel et al., 2018). Fire investigation dogs are used to pinpoint traces of potential accelerants (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021) and thermal imaging cameras to identify hotspots and origins (Police Law Enforcement Solutions, 2018).

Current issues include the portability of GC-MS and the lack of specificity of canine detection. On-site detection is necessary to reduce delays caused by evidence backlogs (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021). Whilst portable GC-MS shows promise, further research is needed to confirm field accuracy (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021). Research into portable MOx sensors (Shalini Devi et al., 2021) offers a rapid alternative to central laboratory GC-MS testing and increased specificity over canine units.

3.2.2 Gunshot

For gunshot analysis, sensors help identify gunshot residue (GSR) on suspects or at a crime scene. Only 11 publications focussed on gunshot analysis, with electrochemical sensing being the most common (64% of papers) (Table 1). Shrivastava et al. (2021a) and Shrivastava et al. (2021b) described a handheld colorimetric sensor for rapid detection of lead and barium in GSR using polyvinyl alcohol capped silver nanoparticles and malonate capped gold nanoparticles respectively, ensuring rapid detection with no interference from other metal ions.

TABLE 1

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Shrivastava et al. detailed the use of a handheld sensor using PVA capped AgNPs for detection of lead in gunshot residue and malonate capped AuNPs for detection of barium without interference from other metal ions Shrivastava et al. (2021a), Shrivastava et al. (2021b)
Electrochemical Key themes were the use of 3D printing, doping of electrodes and ad hoc literature reviews Castro et al. (2020), Promsuwan et al. (2020a), Chedid et al. (2023), McKeever et al. (2022) Harshey et al. (2021), Shrivastava et al. (2021c), Castro et al. (2022)
Luminescence Papers detail the detection of novel nontoxic ammunition alongside novel techniques to detect common metal ions within gunshot residue Chedid et al. (2023), Chaiendoo et al. (2021) Shrivastava et al. (2021c)
Other Ad hoc review of LIBS Senesi et al. (2021)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
UK police currently use colourimetric spot tests Modified Griess Test and Sodium Rhodizonate Test to detect nitrite and lead residues respectively (Krishna and Ahuja, 2023)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in gunshot analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site gunshot analysis.

Electrochemical sensing studies have common themes of 3D printing and doped electrodes (the addition of impurities to modulate properties of the electrodes (Castro et al., 2020) alongside many review articles (36% of publications). Castro et al. (2020) detail the use of 3D-printed electrodes for simultaneous and semi-quantitative detection of lead and antimony (both present in GSR) without the need for sample preparation. Simultaneous detection reduces the numbers of tests needed to ensure identification of different types of GSR, reducing costs and time. Furthermore, the augmentation of electrode response through doping is shown to enable detection at lower concentrations. Promsuwan et al. (2020a) demonstrated enhanced electrocatalytic response with palladium doped glassy carbon microspheres, while McKeever et al. (2022) used voltametric electrodes with magnetic nanoparticles for propellant stabilizer detection. Several ad hoc reviews highlighted the benefits of advanced electrochemical methods such as single strip-based techniques over current heavy instrumentation, such as mass spectrometry (Shrivastava et al., 2021c; Harshey et al., 2021) due to their user-friendliness, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness A third more general review highlighted the benefits of 3D-printing in electrochemical sensing as a powerful, affordable and accessible tool (Castro et al., 2022) emphasising the importance of these research endeavours reaching end users.

Chedid et al. (2023) discussed luminescence sensors for new nontoxic ammunition, which requires alternative detection techniques due to a lack of the conventional metals for detection of GSR. The presence of an inorganic luminescent chemical marker in GSR is shown to be effectively detected using square-wave voltammetry on a carbon paste electrode. Sensors able to detect these new residues will be essential moving forward and demonstrates the need for constant re-evaluation of the current target analytes and therefore techniques needed to detect them.

Senesi et al. (2021) provide an ad hoc review of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for gunpowder origin analysis looking at both prototype instruments and commercially available analysers. Key areas for future research focus on improving the portability and analysis speed of LIBS instruments outside the laboratory while maintaining high performance.

In the UK, police use colorimetric spot tests (Modified Griess Test and Sodium Rhodizonate Test) for on-site GSR analysis (Krishna and Ahuja, 2023), but these have low specificity and can degrade samples (Shrivastava et al., 2021c). Samples are often sent to labs for analysis using scanning electron microscopes (SEM), LIBS, and SERS (Cellmark, 2025b). A move towards field-deployable SEM can provide improvements to current investigative methods (Cellmark, 2025b).

To address these drawbacks, research detailed in the SR highlights promising advancements. Colorimetric sensors using capped nanoparticles (NPs) have been shown to reduce interference from other metal ions in samples (Shrivastava et al., 2021a; Shrivastava et al., 2021b), overcoming issues faced by current devices. Additionally, electrochemical methods under development demonstrate increased specificity compared to current spot tests, with the potential for simultaneous detection. These methods also offer benefits such as cheaper instrumentation and simpler user interfaces, thereby overcoming cost and training barriers (Castro et al., 2020; Castro et al., 2022).

3.2.3 Counterfeits/documentation

Sensors for counterfeit and documentation analysis help identify authentic and forged documents and develop anticounterfeiting labels. 23 (3%) publications were concerned with counterfeit and document analysis, with luminescence sensing technology being most commonly used (78% of papers, see Table 2).

TABLE 2

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Security inks using blue emitters have been demonstrated in anticounterfeiting labels Kumar and Singh (2023)
Electrochemical An ad hoc review looking at the potential for magnetic nanoparticles to enhance electrochemical detection for forensic applications is presented Nadar et al. (2021)
Immunoassay Two ad hoc reviews focus on the potential for aggregation-induced emission and magnetic nanoparticles to apply advances made in other sectors with this technology to forensic detection Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of doped materials and ecofriendly materials. Alongside ad hoc literature reviews Fouad and Saif (2020), Guleria et al. (2020), Kamal and Saif (2020), Naik et al. (2020), Praveen et al. (2020), Srivastava et al. (2020), Suresh et al. (2020), Szczeszak et al. (2020), Abdollahi et al. (2022), Ansari et al. (2022), Han et al. (2022), Li et al. (2022a), Narasimhamurthy et al. (2021), Ravindra et al. (2021), Dwivedi et al. (2023) Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021), Tomar et al. (2023), Verhagen and Kelarakis (2020)
Raman Broad overview in banknote security materials and analytical techniques that are used in detecting counterfeits Tomar et al. (2023)
Other Ad hoc review of LIBS and two papers detailing IR using chemometrics for printer ink analysis and banknote authentication Paxton et al. (2021), Nurfarhana et al. (2022) Senesi et al. (2021)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
UK police use various light sources, including ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) light, for identifying security features (College of Policing, 2017). They also employ magnetic ink detectors and portable spectrometers for this purpose (Regula Forensics, 2025)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in counterfeits or documentation analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site counterfeit and documentation analysis.

Publications identified relating to the use of luminescence sensing have common themes of doped materials and ecofriendly materials along with ad hoc reviews of the literature. Five ad hoc reviews identified examined advances in materials and nanomaterials from other research areas being applied to counterfeit sensing technologies. For example, the use of magnetic nanoclusters with super-magnetic behaviour and smaller dimensions shows significant potential for anticounterfeiting with rapid and full reversible optical responses after magnetic field application (Nadar et al., 2021). However, the shelf-life of these nanoclusters remains uncertain, necessitating further research. Research exploring the aggregation-induced emission (AIE) phenomenon, known for its remarkable luminescence properties, has proven successful in applications such as anticounterfeiting banknotes and confidential documents (Yan et al., 2021). Tetraphenylethene derivatives, exhibiting fluorescence under ultraviolet irradiation but reverting to white colour within 1 min of excitation, demonstrate this effectiveness. Carbon dots (CDs) have also been discussed with a review highlighting their superior fluorescence, low-cost, non-toxic and colour-tuneable nature (Verhagen and Kelarakis, 2020). For example, CDs can be incorporated into inks capable of functioning as novel barcodes and nanotags for authentication and anticounterfeit applications.

The doping of materials has improved detection capabilities. Kamal and Saif (2020) detail the use of barium tungstate doped with terbium ion green nanophosphor and Naik et al. (2020) discuss the use of nitrogen-doped carbon dot threads as fluorescent ink in potential anti-counterfeiting applications.

The need for environmentally friendly and non-toxic materials were key research themes (Szczeszak et al., 2020). Lanthanide-doped SrF2 nanoparticles combined with luminescent cellulose fibres have been developed for anti-counterfeiting applications, where they are invisible under ambient light but bright green under near-infrared light (Szczeszak et al., 2020). This use of organic fibres is both beneficial to the environment and reduces associated costs with material manufacture. Abdollahi et al. (2022) detail the use of metal-free and eco-friendly photoluminescent polymer nanoparticles based on oxazolidine as a sustainable alternative for anticounterfeiting.

Tomar et al. (2023) present a broad overview of banknote security materials and analytical techniques for detecting counterfeits. They discuss new anti-counterfeiting materials and fluorescent nanoparticles that can be used as anti-counterfeiting inks with technologies such as Raman spectroscopy.

Publications not using luminescence technologies included the use colourimetric techniques to produce security ink for anticounterfeiting labels making it easier to detect fakes and trace their origin or dispersal (Kumar and Singh, 2023). 1,8-naphthalimide-based blue emitters non-covalently doped on silica have been demonstrated, with excellent results, in real-world situations. Infrared (IR) technology has also been demonstrated alongside novel chemometric methods to provide successful forensic analysis on printer inks (Paxton et al., 2021) and authentication for banknotes (Nurfarhana et al., 2022).

Counterfeit detection involves examining security features such as watermarks, holograms, and special inks. The UK police currently use various tools, including ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) light, to check for security features that are invisible under normal lighting (College of Policing, 2017). However, these methods can produce false positives or negatives due to environmental factors or wear and tear and are limited to features specifically designed to be UV or IR reactive. Magnetic ink detectors are also employed to identify the presence of magnetic inks found in genuine banknotes and important documents, which are typically absent in most counterfeits (Regula Forensics, 2025). These detectors can be affected by nearby electronic devices or metal objects, and sophisticated counterfeiters increasingly use magnetic inks that can deceive them. Portable spectrometers, such as the Regula 4,115 (Regula Forensics, 2025), are used for the express verification of banknotes, featuring a built-in camera and various light sources for a comprehensive examination of security features. However, these devices are costly and require significant training for proper use.

To address these challenges, recent research highlighted in the SR points to promising advancements in colourimetric and luminescent sensing. These advances involve techniques such as doping (Kamal and Saif, 2020; Naik et al., 2020) and the use of environmentally friendly materials (Szczeszak et al., 2020; Abdollahi et al., 2022) to enhance detection capabilities and reduce costs, respectively. Additionally, magnetic nanoclusters exhibit super-magnetic behaviour compared to conventional magnetic inks (Nadar et al., 2021). Their distinct and durable magnetic properties make them difficult to replicate. However, further research is needed to commercialize these technologies.

3.2.4 Pollutants

With increasing environmental concerns, monitoring illegal discharges and pollutants is crucial. Among the 50 (6%) publications on pollutant analysis, electrochemical and luminescence technologies dominated, accounting for 70% (Table 3). Key themes identified included eco-friendly materials, dual detection (combining two sensing technologies for enhanced detection), law-enforcement approval and portability.

TABLE 3

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Optical sensors for detection of illicit discharge into sewage and of illicit dyes. A focus on pollutants of emerging concern and the use of environmentally friendly materials in detection Rocher et al. (2021), de Souza et al. (2022) Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Neal et al. (2021)
Electrochemical Key themes were the use of ecofriendly materials, law-enforcement approval and dual detection Noviana et al. (2019), Yu et al. (2022a), Shalini Devi et al. (2021), Hakeem et al. (2022), Kabel et al. (2021), Karuppaiah et al. (2023), Shi et al. (2021), Singh et al. (2021), Kolacz et al. (2023), Singh et al. (2020), Myadam et al. (2021), Molinara et al. (2022) Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Neal et al. (2021), Kushwaha et al. (2022), Castro et al. (2022), Kadu et al. (2023)
Immunoassay A focus on dual detection using immunochromatography is seen Wu et al. (2021a), Senra and Fonseca (2021), Yu et al. (2022a), Li et al. (2023a), Lan et al. (2020) Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Nardo et al. (2021), Mao et al. (2021a), Uttpal et al. (2022), Bräuer et al. (2021), Dube et al. (2023)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of ecofriendly materials, law enforcement approval and portability through miniaturisation Wu et al. (2021a), Chengyi et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2021b), Rocher et al. (2021), Su et al. (2021), Liu et al. (2022a), Liu et al. (2023a), Warning et al. (2021), Lian et al. (2020a), Harsha et al. (2020), Ke et al. (2020) Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Neal et al. (2021), Kushwaha et al. (2022), Uttpal et al. (2022)
Raman A focus again here is seen on dual detection through the combination of SERS with other technologies such as TLC. Vunckx et al. (2020), Yang et al. (2021a), Li et al. (2023a), Chang et al. (2022a), Jiang et al. (2021a), Nie et al. (2023), Vendamani et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2022a), Yao et al. (2022a) Zhang et al. (2022a)
Other IR shows potential to detect pollution in sewage. The use of cockroaches to assess the toxicity of environmental pollutant has been demonstrated Rocher et al. (2022), Adedara et al. (2022)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
UK government organisations utilise instruments such as portable Raman spectrometers, photoionization detectors (PIDs) and x-ray fluorescence analysers (XRF) (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025; Guidance, 2014)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in pollutant analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site pollutant analysis.

To reduce environmental and other costs, the use of eco-friendly materials is important, particularly for large-scale production. Senra and Fonseca (2021) demonstrated the potential for replacing expensive tyrosinases (type-3 copper metalloenzymes) with cost-effective freshwater ciliates, rapid-growing unicellular microeukaryotes. They employed virtual screening to compute binding energies between 3D models of these homologs, paving the way for more economical alternatives. Additionally, paper-based (Noviana et al., 2019) and cellulose-based (Kamel and Khattab, 2020) biosensors were highlighted as environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional substrates.

Dual detection sensors simultaneously measure multiple parameters or analytes by integrating different sensing technologies or methods, enhancing accuracy, sensitivity, and versatility across various applications (Lan et al., 2020). Zhang et al. (2022a)ad hoc review discussed using thin layer chromatography (TLC) coupled with SERS for on-site multi-component detection. The TLC chromatographic plate is used for high-throughput separation with SERS enabling quantitative detection of mixtures. However, further work is needed to mature the technology for on-site applications, including the use of porous materials or polymers to enhance separation efficiency and the application of machine learning to improve the accuracy of quantitative signal information. Immunochromatographic assay strip readers combining immunoassay and chromatography techniques were also noted in two papers demonstrating their ability to extend the range of detectable analytes (Wu et al., 2021a) and increase the speed of detection (Lan et al., 2020).

Pena-Pereira et al. (2021) present an extensive ad hoc review of miniaturised analytical methods for detecting emerging environmental contaminants (e.g., illicit drugs, surfactants and personal care products). They highlight opportunities for low-cost, field deployable devices with the possibility for creating big data sets at low cost, and the development of screening methods to be used before more expensive traditional sensing methods (e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) are used to validate results. However, challenges include law enforcement approval, stability of sensing elements and few commercially available set-ups. Approval from law-enforcement agencies is key in moving developed sensors from small to large-scale use.

For identifying and measuring pollutants at crime scenes, accidents, or environmental incidents UK government organisations currently use instruments like GC-MS, Raman spectrometers, photoionization detectors (PIDs) and x-ray fluorescence analysers (XRF) (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025; Guidance, 2014). Portable GCs require specialised training, regular maintenance and high initial and operational costs (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025). PIDs are effective for detection of volatile organic compounds but not other pollutants (Zimmerman et al., 2020). XRF typically analyses only the surface layer of a sample, with interference from other elements and potential radiation exposure posing additional concerns (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advances to tackle these current challenges. A crucial focus lies in addressing cost concerns by exploring more economical alternatives, both in material selection (Senra and Fonseca, 2021; Noviana et al., 2019; Kamel and Khattab, 2020) and screening methods (Pena-Pereira et al., 2021), which have shown promise. Additionally, current shortcomings in the capacity of tests to detect multiple target analytes have been emphasised. Dual detection methods have emerged as a solution, enhancing the range and speed of analyte detection, though further research is needed to mature these technologies for practical use (Zhang et al., 2022a; Wu et al., 2021a).

3.2.5 Body fluids

Body fluid analysis, encompassing a wide range of analytes from salivary amylase to DNA, is crucial for combating crime. 56 (7%) publications were concerned with body fluid analysis, with all sensing technologies being fairly evenly represented (Table 4). Key themes identified included the importance of ecofriendly materials and dual detection.

TABLE 4

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Papers have focused on DNA analysis and alpha amylase detection for identification of saliva samples Tortajada-Genaro et al. (2022), Khajouei et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020a), Calabretta et al. (2021) Kamel and Khattab (2020), McGoldrick and Halámek (2020), Adhikary and Banerjee (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021)
Electrochemical A key theme was the use of eco-friendly materials Noviana et al. (2019), Ataide et al. (2020), Sanli et al. (2020), Kim (2021), Zhang et al. (2020a), Cook and Honeychurch (2021), Izham et al. (2022), Patiti et al. (2022), Pierpaoli et al. (2022), Kang et al. (2020a), Liao et al. (2020), Mishra et al. (2020), Sadeghi et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Nadar et al. (2021), Mani et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021)
Immunoassay Papers focus on detection of fluids from DNA using AuNP-protein nanopores to bioanalytes such as uranyl in urine using aptamer-modified nanosensor arrays Garcia-Cruz et al. (2020), Meir et al. (2020), Loredana et al. (2020), Sanli et al. (2020), Tang et al. (2020), Tortajada-Genaro et al. (2022), Lee et al. (2022a), Mishra et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), McGoldrick and Halámek (2020), Nadar et al. (2021), Nardo et al. (2021), Bräuer et al. (2021)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of eco-friendly materials and dual detection Calabretta et al. (2021), Kang et al. (2020b), Kasry et al. (2021), Badshah et al. (2020), Bazzi et al. (2023), Fan et al. (2023), Kasry et al. (2021), Chen et al. (2021a), Melman et al. (2022), Lian et al. (2020a), Khunoana et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021)
Raman Papers have focused on the use of Raman to differentiate between hair dyes and to identify blood samples Vendamani et al. (2023), Atta and Vo-Dinh (2023), Bruner and Monjardez (2023), Cai et al. (2022a), Erturan et al. (2023), Gautam et al. (2022), Higgins and Kurouski (2023), Ondieki et al. (2023), Reese et al. (2021), Suarez et al. (2023), Liu et al. (2021)
Other Papers have mostly focused on DNA identification through microfluidic and nanopore sensing approaches. Analysis of blood and semen stains is also discussed Bruijns et al. (2020), Dhar et al. (2021), Mereuta et al. (2022), Schmidt et al. (2022), Yildirim et al. (2023)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
UK police use luminol and Bluestar for blood detection using luminescence technologies (College of Policing, 2017; Forensics Library, 2024). Rapid Stain Identification (RSID) tests use immunochromatographic assay technology for saliva, semen and urine detection (Forensic Body Fluid Analysis Services, 2024; Harbison and Fleming, 2016). Portable DNA analysers are also employed such as the RapidHIT ID System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2024)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in body fluid analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site body fluid analysis.

Paper-based methods show promise for on-site analysis of mitochondrial DNA and salivary amylase (Dhar et al., 2021). One paper-based device using core-shell nanoparticles identifies saliva by showing a visible colour change when the shell is disrupted by alpha-amylase exposure (Adhikary and Banerjee, 2021). For mass on-site analysis further testing on human saliva samples is needed. Kamel and Khattab (2020) discuss recent advances in cellulose-based biosensors for medical diagnosis. The use of these alternatives present renewable, less toxic and cheaper solutions to existing sensing devices.

Another key area of research is in the coupling of sensing technologies for a dual detection sensor. One example is the development of a grating-coupler as a transducer to excite surface-plasmon combined with fluorescence to identify DNA sequences creating quick and sensitive on-site analysis potential (Kasry et al., 2021). Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) offer rapid, cost-effective on-site applications, and have become widespread in recent years (Nardo et al., 2021). In their ad hoc literature review, Nardo et al. (2021) report that LFIAs have been developed to analyse prostate specific antigens (Kishbaugh et al., 2019), salivary amylase (Kishbaugh et al., 2019) and human haemoglobin (Murahashi et al., 2020).

UK police use various sensors to detect body fluids at crime scenes. Luminol and bluestar cause a luminescent reaction upon contact with haemoglobin, making bloodstains visible even if they e been cleaned or are not visible to the naked eye (College of Policing, 2017; Forensics Library, 2024). There are issues with false positives from certain metals and cleaning agents, DNA degradation complicating subsequent analysis, and the short-lived luminescent reaction making it difficult to document complex crime scenes effectively (College of Policing, 2017; Forensics Library, 2024). Rapid Stain Identification (RSID) tests detect specific body fluids like saliva, semen, and urine using specific markers like prostate-specific antigen for semen (Forensic Body Fluid Analysis Services, 2024; Harbison and Fleming, 2016). RSID tests, while specific, can still suffer from cross-reactivity and sensitivity issues with the presence of other body fluids (Harbison and Fleming, 2016). Portable DNA analysers, such as the RapidHIT ID System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2024), can be useful in time-sensitive investigations in helping identify individuals from biological samples (Forensics Library, 2024). Issues of cost and complexity in the operation of portable DNA analysers can be a limitation for smaller police departments alongside sensitivity to environmental conditions causing a reduction in performance and accuracy (Forensics Library, 2024).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to tackle current challenges. Research into eco-friendly materials has shown promise in paper-based DNA detection methods, which can reduce costs (Dhar et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of dual detection techniques has been explored, demonstrating potential for rapid and sensitive on-site DNA analysis (Kasry et al., 2021). Improvements to RSID tests are also being investigated, with methods such as core-shell nanoparticles being researched for rapid colourimetric testing (Adhikary and Banerjee, 2021). However, these methods require further testing on human samples before they can be commercially utilised.

3.2.6 Explosives

Sensors in explosives analysis facilitate the (proactive) identification of potential explosive threats, such as during the screening of large crowds. 83 (10%) publications were concerned with explosives analysis, with luminescence sensing technology being the most commonly used (47% of papers, see Table 5). Key themes identified included dual detection, selective detection, 3D printing and portability of sensors.

TABLE 5

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Key themes were the use of dual detection, selective detection and improvised explosives detection Abuzalat et al. (2020), Elbasuney et al. (2020a), Raza et al. (2020), Batool et al. (2022a), Cao et al. (2022), Su et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022c), Huang et al. (2022a), Li et al. (2022b), Nsuamani et al. (2022), Thipwimonmas et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2021a), Dhiman et al. (2021), Patil et al. (2020), Forbes et al. (2020), Pollock et al. (2021) Adegoke and Nic Daeid (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Junaid et al. (2022)
Electrochemical A key theme was the use of 3D printing Cardoso et al. (2020), Dutta et al. (2020), Zhu et al. (2022a), Apak et al. (2023), Arman et al. (2022), Dief et al. (2022), Mohan et al. (2021), Puttasakul et al. (2022), Li et al. (2020b), Tan et al. (2020), Urbanová and Pumera (2020), Pollock et al. (2021) Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Kushwaha et al. (2022), Castro et al. (2022), Shalini Devi et al. (2021)
Immunoassay Papers focus on technologies such as ligand binding proteins, MIPs and AIE. The portability of these technologies is considered Scorsone et al. (2021), Karadurmus et al. (2022), Paul et al. (2020) Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021)
Luminescence A key theme was the use of dual detection Gao et al. (2021), Scorsone et al. (2021), Qin et al. (2022a), Abuzalat et al. (2020), Batool et al. (2022a), Cao et al. (2022), Su et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022c), Zhu et al. (2022a), Bener et al. (2022), Chakraborty et al. (2022), Hao et al. (2021), Harathi and Thenmozhi (2022), Hu et al. (2023), Khan et al. (2021), Kumar et al. (2021), Li et al. (2023b), Nguyen et al. (2023), Noh et al. (2022), Pragya et al. (2022), Qin et al. (2022b), Santos et al. (2021), Praveen et al. (2020), Kathiravan et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020c), Lin et al. (2020), Paul et al. (2020), Patil et al. (2020), Thakarda et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2020a), Pollock et al. (2021), Mitri et al. (2022) Nadar et al. (2021), Kumar (2021a), Rasheed et al. (2020), Verbitskiy et al. (2020), Neal et al. (2021), Junaid et al. (2022), Kushwaha et al. (2022)
Raman Papers focussed on the design of SERS substrates such as SiO2-TiO2 Aerogel/Ag Flexible Films and Au/AgNPs Vunckx et al. (2020), Gao et al. (2020), He et al. (2020a), Liu et al. (2020a), Raza et al. (2020), Vendamani et al. (2023), Liu et al. (2022b), Goel et al. (2022)
Other Continuous real-time monitoring, IR and LIBS are discussed as some of the technologies used Díez-Pascual et al. (2022), Dreier et al. (2022), Kumar et al. (2020a), Saha et al. (2022), van Damme et al. (2023), Viola et al. (2023), Elbasuney et al. (2020b), Kumar et al. (2020a), Ricci and Gregory (2020), Santoro et al. (2020), Hung et al. (2022) Senesi et al. (2021), Ricci and Gregory (2021)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
Portable ion mobility, Raman and mass spectrometers are employed (ENFSI, 2021). Alongside, fluorescence imaging, colourimetric test kits and canine units (ENFSI, 2021; NPSA, 2025)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in explosives analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site explosives analysis.

Dual detection enhances sensitivity and selectivity, with Cao et al. (2022) proposing the combined use of colourimetric and fluorescent sensing with a carbon dots/titanyl sulfate (CDs/TiOSO4) sensing system for peroxides. Su et al. (2022) also demonstrate colourimetric sensing alongside luminescence using a Pt (II) terpyridyl complex-based sensing platform for perchlorate detection in water, soil and air. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) offer artificial recognition sites with a fluorescent composite of carbon dots (CDs) for on-site analysis (Nadar et al., 2021). The use of these dual detection methods limits the selectivity from other strong oxidants which could otherwise generate false positives (Cao et al., 2022).

3D printing rapidly produces electrodes for electrochemical sensing. For example, Cardoso et al. (2020) compared 3D printing pens and desktop printers for TNT detection. A key advantage of 3D printed electrodes is that new electrode surfaces can be generated by polishing thereby enabling reuse of the sensor–another advantage over chemically-modified electrochemical sensors (Cardoso et al., 2020). Urbanová and Pumera (2020) looked at the use of 3D printed titanium electrodes and Castro et al. (2022) completed an ad hoc review of 3D-printed electrochemical sensors showing the great promise they have for portable, on-site analysis.

Furthermore, continuous real-time monitoring of many explosives has been explored using a free-standing thin-film sensor relying on the catalytic decomposition of the explosive and its heat effects (Ricci and Gregory, 2021). Senesi et al. (2021) reviewed laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), a chemical elemental analysis technique which is found to be a sensitive and selective sensing technology suitable for on-site measurement.

In investigating crime scenes with potential explosives, UK police currently use a variety of on-site devices. Portable explosive detectors, such as ion mobility and mass spectrometers, offer rapid detection but face issues like high-cost, false positives from molecules with similar structures, sensitivity to environmental conditions like humidity and temperature and a limited range of detectable compounds, particularly newer or less common explosives (ENFSI, 2021). Canine units can be used with their high sensitivity to detect a range of explosive materials quickly (NPSA, 2025). Issues of high training costs, fatigue and distraction and the potential for false positives or false negatives due to masking odours (NIST, 2025). Colourimetric kits provide simple and immediate results but lack specificity and their storage and shelf-life can have a large impact on their effectiveness (ENFSI, 2021). Fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy provide non-destructive analysis utilising compounds unique spectral fingerprints. These technologies face limitations due to their complexity, high costs, the need for trained personnel and potential interference from other substances (ENFSI, 2021).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Issues of high-cost, false positives and range of target analytes within current sensors are seen to be tackled by research within identified SR papers with dual detection gaining significant attention (Su et al., 2022; Nadar et al., 2021). Dual detection is also seen to provide an improvement to the lack of specificity associated with current colourimetric tests (Cao et al., 2022; Su et al., 2022). Additionally, the 3D printing of electrodes in electrochemical sensors is being explored to reduce the costs of current sensing technologies (Castro et al., 2022; Cardoso et al., 2020). Continuous real-time monitoring, as presented in the SR literature, offers a substantial improvement over current canine units by reducing costs and training time (Ricci and Gregory, 2021).

3.2.7 Poison/toxin

Sensors for poison and toxin analysis are crucial for safeguarding health, protecting the environment and responding to hazardous material emergencies. 99 (13%) publications were concerned with poison/toxin analysis, with luminescence sensing technologies being the most commonly used (41% of papers, see Table 6). Key themes of eco-friendly materials, fast response and on-site technologies have been highlighted in identified papers with development of recognition elements playing a key role in achieving these.

TABLE 6

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Papers focus on analytes from hazardous chemicals to nerve agents and environmental contaminants, with many in the gas phase. With a focus on the portability and rapid response of sensors Rocher et al. (2021), Ahamed et al. (2023), Kumar (2021b), Zhao et al. (2022a), Chen et al. (2020b), Shin et al. (2020), Takahashi et al. (2021), María-Hormigos et al. (2022) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021)
Electrochemical Key themes were the use of nanomaterials nanoparticles and magnetic nanoparticles and portability Ataide et al. (2020), Noviana et al. (2019), Balaji et al. (2020), Kweitsu et al. (2021), Kim et al. (2020), Zhu et al. (2022a), Liu et al. (2022c), Kolacz et al. (2023), Ong et al. (2023), Santana et al. (2021), Yoo et al. (2022), Myadam et al. (2021), Montali et al. (2020), Nagabooshanam et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2020c) Nadar et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Castro et al. (2022), Shalini Devi et al. (2021), Kadu et al. (2023), Pohanka (2022)
Immunoassay Key themes were the use of nanomaterials and group recognition Meir et al. (2020), Chengyi et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2021b), Senra and Fonseca (2021), Pöhlmann and Elßner (2020), Tuccitto et al. (2020a), Tuccitto et al. (2020b), Wille and Elliott (2021), Lu et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2023a), Köse et al. (2021), Lan et al. (2020), Yao et al. (2020), Zhou et al. (2020) Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021), Nardo et al. (2021), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Mao et al. (2021a), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Kumar et al. (2020b), Nurazzi et al. (2021), Rary et al. (2020)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of ecofriendly materials, dual recognition and gas sensing Rocher et al. (2021), Su et al. (2021), Naik et al. (2020), Xue et al. (2021), Ahamed et al. (2023), Kumar (2021b), Zhu et al. (2022a), Liu et al. (2022c), Chen et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2023a), Das et al. (2022), Feng et al. (2023), Nugroho et al. (2023), Qiu et al. (2022), Suhasini et al. (2021), Wu et al. (2022a), Zhang et al. (2022d), Zhao et al. (2020a), Lian et al. (2020a), Harsha et al. (2020), Ke et al. (2020), Dagnaw et al. (2020), Ma et al. (2020), Montali et al. (2020), Pappalardo et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020b), Xu et al. (2020), Xu et al. (2021), Yang et al. (2020a), Yang et al. (2020b), Yao et al. (2020), Yi and Zhang (2021) Nadar et al. (2021), Kumar (2021a), Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Verhagen and Kelarakis (2020), Ganesan and Nagaraaj (2020), Tuccitto et al. (2020c), Hang et al. (2022)
Raman Key themes were the use of novel materials quantum dots, nanomaterials, metal-organic frameworks, environmental monitoring and portability Vunckx et al. (2020), Yang et al. (2021a), Balaji et al. (2020), Tay and Hulse (2021), Wille and Elliott (2021), Lu et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2023a), Atta and Vo-Dinh (2023), Liu et al. (2022d), Wu et al. (2022b), Xie et al. (2022b), Ding et al. (2022) Hang et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022b)
Other Key themes were the use of dual detection, environmental monitoring and nanomaterials Dhar et al. (2021), Díez-Pascual et al. (2022), Viola et al. (2023), Liberatore et al. (2023), Zhu et al. (2022b), Guria et al. (2020), Kvachakhia et al. (2020), Rahman et al. (2020), Estevez et al. (2022) Senesi et al. (2021)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
Portable infrared spectrometers are currently used (Thermo Scientific, 2024). Additionally, biosensors (Naresh and Lee, 2021; Justino et al., 2017) based on electrochemical, optical, or piezoelectric principles, as well as multiplex immunoassay platforms (Mégarbane et al., 2020; Pöhlmann and Elßner, 2020), are employed for detecting a variety of substances

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in poison or toxin analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site poison and toxin analysis.

The use of AIE phenomenon on filter paper strips detecting volatile poisons and pesticides has been demonstrated, though further research is needed for detecting poisons in body fluids and universal AIE probes for group recognition (Yan et al., 2021). A recognition element that detects classes of poisons would reduce sensing time and cost (Senra and Fonseca, 2021). An ad hoc review (Nardo et al., 2021) of LFIAs (also discussed above) details their use in the rapid on-site detection of viruses (Couturier et al., 2020; DeMers et al., 2020), toxins (Wu et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2020d; Bever et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2019), mycotoxins (Li et al., 2019a; Huang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2019b; Wang et al., 2021b; Wang et al., 2020b; Byzova et al., 2020), bacteria (Zhuang et al., 2020; Ilhan et al., 2021; He et al., 2019; Anfossi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), allergens (Galan-Malo et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021b) and pesticides (Ge et al., 2020; Cevallos-Cedeño et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020a). Paper-based on-site methods for pathogen detection using isothermal nucleic acid amplification are demonstrated (Dhar et al., 2021). Fast response time has been demonstrated using two fluorescent probe molecules (4-mercaptocoumarins) in a test strip to detect mustard gas and its analogues with a 3 min response time and high sensitivity (Xue et al., 2021).

Another key theme was sensing of gaseous target analytes. Shin et al. (2020) developed a sensitive colorimetric gas sensor with a smartphone-based analysis for real-time quantitative detection of bacterial-derived ammonia gas, helping determine the postmortem interval (PMI). Such on-site sensing overcomes previous challenges of bacterial growth whilst the body is being moved which can produce false PMIs. Multiplexed gas sensing is discussed with several papers looking at the use of bifunctional fluorescent probes. These probes, equipped with two sensing sites, yield two distinct fluorescence responses upon exposure to either of the two target analytes, ranging from various nerve agent stimulants to mustard gas and phosgene (Feng et al., 2023).

The detection of poisons and toxins to combat crime presents a wide range of target analytes. UK police and other emergency responders currently employ a broad range of technologies for rapid and accurate on-site detection. Portable spectrometers such as Thermo Scientific’s TruDefender and FirstDefender use infrared spectroscopy but are costly and complex (Thermo Scientific, 2024). Biosensors based on electrochemical, optical or piezoelectric principles are common in use providing rapid results (Naresh and Lee, 2021; Justino et al., 2017). Challenges such as environmental instability (fluctuations in pH, humidity, and temperature), interference from complex sample matrices, and a limited detection range persist when attempting to simultaneously detect multiple analytes (Justino et al., 2017). Multiplex immunoassay platforms are also used allowing simultaneous detection of multiple toxins in a single sample by using antibodies to bind to specific toxins making them highly specific. However, there are issues of interference and a limited detection range with many potential unknown target analytes (Mégarbane et al., 2020; Pöhlmann and Elßner, 2020).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Current issues such as high costs and a limited range of detectable target analytes are being tackled by papers identified within the SR focussing on the use of AIE probes for group recognition (Yan et al., 2021) and cost-effective paper-based methods (Dhar et al., 2021). The development of these technologies is expected to significantly impact not only poison and toxin detection but also the detection of other target analytes.

3.2.8 Fingerprints

Fingerprint analysis is a key tool in modern law enforcement, providing reliable and efficient identification of individuals. 108 (14%) publications concerned fingerprint analysis, with luminescence sensing technologies being the most commonly used (79% of papers, see Table 7). Key themes include the development of environmentally friendly, non-toxic sensors and the use of nanomaterials for enhanced fingerprint sensing.

TABLE 7

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Papers focus on the application of nanomaterials, such as graphene-isolated nanocrystals, hierarchical structures emitting colours, and fluorescent-labelled nanohybrids Azman et al. (2021), Rajan et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2022a), Dhiman et al. (2021), Costa et al. (2020), Dare et al. (2020), Prasad et al. (2021), Lin et al. (2022), Rasin et al. (2023), Bhagat et al. (2019), Divya et al. (2020), Kumar and Singh (2023) Nadar et al. (2021), Sharma et al. (2021)
Electrochemical Electrochemical paper-based devices are reviewed alongside the use of nanomaterials and polymers Ataide et al. (2020), Wei and Cui (2021), Liu et al. (2023b), Malik et al. (2020), Hu et al. (2020a) Nadar et al. (2021)
Immunoassay Papers look at the combination of multiple advanced techniques and renewable materials such as Chitosan Tiedge et al. (2020), Vuckovic et al. (2021) Nadar et al. (2021)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of nanomaterial advances, dual detection and eco-friendly materials Ding et al. (2021a), Mengjun and Peng (2021), Pattarith and Benchawattananon (2020), Lee et al. (2022b), Rajput and Shishodia (2020), Shabashini et al. (2021), Shahbazi et al. (2020), Trabelsi et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2020d), Wang et al. (2020e), Yuan et al. (2020), Zhao et al. (2020b), Gonzalez et al. (2020), Nugroho et al. (2023), Fan et al. (2023), Abdollahi et al. (2022), Ansari et al. (2022), Li et al. (2022a), Narasimhamurthy et al. (2021), Ravindra et al. (2021), Cai et al. (2022b), Duan et al. (2022a), Ghubish and El-Kemary (2022), Jindal and Kaur (2023), King et al. (2021), Latha et al. (2021), Lavanya et al. (2022), Lee et al. (2022b), Li et al. (2021a), Li and Peng (2022), Machado et al. (2022), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Nugroho et al. (2022a), Nugroho et al. (2022b), Peng et al. (2022), Peng and Zhao (2023), Pramanik et al. (2022), Qiu et al. (2021), Ran et al. (2022), Renuka et al. (2021), Sekar et al. (2021), Singh et al. (2022a), Swathi et al. (2023), Vadivel et al. (2021), Wan et al. (2022), Wang et al. (2022b), Yu et al. (2022b), Yu et al. (2023a), Yuan et al. (2022a), Zhang et al. (2021c), Zhu et al. (2022c), Zou et al. (2022a), Fouad and Saif (2020), Guleria et al. (2020), Kamal and Saif (2020), Suresh et al. (2020), Ghubish et al. (2020), Hu et al. (2020a), Jenie et al. (2020), Kumar et al. (2020c), Lai et al. (2020), Navami et al. (2020), Olszowska et al. (2020), Pavitra et al. (2020), Prabakaran and Pillay (2020a), Prabakaran and Pillay (2020b), Liu and Zhang (2020), Dwivedi et al. (2023), Firmino et al. (2021), Illston-Baggs et al. (2021), Kanodarwala et al. (2021), You et al. (2021) Nadar et al. (2021), Verhagen and Kelarakis (2020), Lian et al. (2020b), Prasad et al. (2020), Sharma et al., 2021, Pinto et al. (2022), Prabakaran and Pillay (2021), Shahbazi et al. (2022)
Raman Papers look at the self-assembly of nanocrystals onto lipidic ridge details provides a dual-sensing technique and a the miniaturisation of Raman spectrometers Vunckx et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2022a)
Other Papers look at the use of nanomaterials and doping to enhance detection and an ad hoc review of various fingerprint development techniques currently used Liang et al. (2020), Assis et al. (2023), Bhati et al. (2023), Bumbrah et al. (2022), Dahiya et al. (2022), Fouda-Mbanga et al. (2022), Fouda-Mbanga et al. (2023), Bouaziz et al. (2022) Ferreira et al. (2021a)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
MobileID Devices are currently used to collect on-site fingerprints, with the IDENT1 System enabling real-time identification (Fingerprint Identification, 2024; Mobileidworld, 2013; Press Release, 2018; IDEMIA, 2025; Neurotechnology, 2025; Fingerprint Identification, 2024; Mobileidworld, 2013; Press Release, 2018; IDEMIA, 2025; Neurotechnology, 2025). Various powders and lifting techniques are currently employed to develop latent prints on-site including aluminium, magna flake, black granular, and black magnetic powders (Bandey and Gibson, 2006) (NCJRS Virtual Library, 2001; Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, 2022)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in fingerprint analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site fingerprint analysis.

The development of environmentally friendly, non-toxic sensors was a key issue identified for mass production. Azman et al. (2021) proposed using a lipase from Candida rugosa (CRL) as a greener option for fingerprint analysis on wet substrates. Although CRL is used in various scientific applications (Prlainović et al., 2013; Che Marzuki et al., 2015; Mohamad et al., 2015), its use in fingerprint visualisation is limited, presenting an exciting research opportunity.

Recent advances in the use of nanomaterials for sensing can be applied to fingerprint sensing for many benefits. A review of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to conjugate with quantum dots (QDs) for fluorescence properties has been presented (Nadar et al., 2021). Unlike traditional powders used, the small size of MNPs were found to be efficient in selectively binding to fingerprints and not the background. Gold nanoparticles on fibrous nano-silica enhance ridge details and sweat pores on various surfaces with properties of low-cost, easy preparation, chemical stability and great affinity to finger residues (Wei and Cui, 2021). Ansari et al. (2022) review applied nanomaterials and luminescent Ln3+ NPs/upconversion (UC) NPs which provide higher contrast, sensitivity and selectivity which is lacking in most of the traditional fluorescent nanomaterials used. However, more studies are needed to improve the efficiency, performance, surface-functionality and biocompatibility of these Ln3+ NPs/UCNPs for fingerprint recognition.

Carbon dots (CDs) present exceptional characteristics such as high fluorescence, non-toxicity, eco-friendliness, stability and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods. Shabashini et al. (2021) present an ad hoc review of publications relating to the application of CDs but of importance here is the enhancement of fingerprint visualisation, using magnetic composite powder CDs, due to the abundant surface hydrophilic groups (Ding et al., 2021a). Low-cost, superparamagnetic fluorescence performance and excellent safety makes these CDs suitable candidates for on-site visualisation. However, issues remain to transition from proof of concept to field application.

For on-site fingerprint detection the UK police use various mobile biometric devices to capture fingerprints and perform identity checks in real-time (Press Release, 2018). NEC MobileID (Fingerprint Identification, 2024) allows officers to capture fingerprints while Cross Match SEEK Avenger (Mobileidworld, 2013) captures fingerprints, iris scans and facial images. Both devices enable real-time identification cross-referencing with the UK’s central fingerprint databases (e.g., IDENT1 System (Press Release, 2018)). Fixed systems in police stations, like Morpho Livescan by IDEMIA (IDEMIA, 2025) and Crossmatch L SCAN (Neurotechnology, 2025), offer higher quality capturing. However, the use of on-site detection is preferable to reduce trips to and from police stations improving efficiency (Press Release, 2018). Many kits are currently used for developing latent fingerprints at crime scenes. These include powders and lifting tapes, which are then analysed further in a lab or using mobile devices with Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) access. The choice of powder depends on the surface, with common types being aluminium, magna flake, black granular, and black magnetic powders (Bandey and Gibson, 2006). Traditional powder lifting technologies face limitations, including sensitivity to environmental conditions, surface compatibility, DNA degradation due to chemicals used and the need for extensive training to ensure proper application and interpretation (NCJRS Virtual Library, 2001; Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, 2022).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Improvements to MobileID devices were not captured within this SR. A key theme in the papers identified through this SR was the use of nanomaterials instead of traditional powders for fingerprint detection. These nanomaterials offer enhanced sensitivity and selectivity, overcoming issues related to environmental conditions (Ansari et al., 2022; Nadar et al., 2021). However, further research is needed to improve surface functionality and biocompatibility to transition these innovations from proof of concept to widespread field application (Ansari et al., 2022; Shabashini et al., 2021; Ding et al., 2021a).

3.2.9 Food safety

For food safety, sensors are essential for maintaining the integrity of the supply chain, protecting public health and ensuring compliance with regulations. 168 (22%) publications concerned food safety, with immunoassay sensing technologies being the most commonly used (36% of papers). The remaining papers were represented by a fairly even spread of sensing technologies (Table 8). Key themes discussed include the use of dual detection, nanomaterials and portability.

TABLE 8

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Key themes were the use of dual detection (particularly immunochromatographic assays), nanomaterials, portability, labelling and metal-organic frameworks Chu et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020e), Dai et al. (2022), Zhou et al. (2021), Wu et al. (2022c), Tortajada-Genaro et al. (2022), Fang et al. (2023), Qin et al. (2022c), Zhang et al. (2022e), Zhao et al. (2022b), Amalraj et al. (2022), Baghban et al. (2022), Ranbir et al. (2023), Tasangtong et al. (2023), Malahom et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Hua et al. (2021), Li et al. (2020f), Cheng et al. (2021), Zhou et al. (2022a)
Electrochemical Key themes were the use of eco-friendly materials paper-based and nanomaterials Ataide et al. (2020), Noviana et al. (2019), Hu et al. (2021), Ngo et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020e), Mansouri et al. (2020), Rocha et al. (2020), Roushani et al. (2021), Saichanapan et al. (2020), Shishkanova et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2021c), Xie et al. (2020), Zhang et al. (2020b), Sfragano et al. (2020), Nagabooshanam et al. (2021), Dai et al. (2022), Yu et al. (2022a), Han et al. (2023), Shao et al. (2023), Kushwaha et al. (2022), Hakeem et al. (2022), Singh et al. (2021), Bai (2022), Carvalho et al. (2023), Geng et al. (2023), Gurusamy et al. (2022), Jin et al. (2023), Joao et al. (2021), Lei et al. (2022), Mei et al. (2022), Qader et al. (2022), Sun et al. (2023), Sundhoro et al. (2021), Torrarit et al. (2022), Wu et al. (2022d), Zhou et al. (2022b) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Li et al. (2020f), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Cheng et al. (2021), Zhou et al. (2022a), Gaudin (2021), Castro et al. (2022), Ferrari et al. (2021), Mahmudiono et al. (2022)
Immunoassay Key themes were the use of dual detection, eco-friendly materials and multiplexing Yao et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Duan et al. (2020), Na et al. (2020), He et al. (2021), Li et al. (2020e), Peng et al. (2020), Rebelo et al. (2021), Roushani et al. (2021), Zhang et al. (2020c), Suryoprabowo et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2021c), Wu et al. (2020c), Li et al. (2020g), Zhang et al. (2020d), Zinna et al. (2020), Moon et al. (2020), Lan et al. (2020), Zhou et al. (2020), Dai et al. (2022), Zhou et al. (2021), Wu et al. (2022c), Tortajada-Genaro et al. (2022), Fang et al. (2023), Qin et al. (2022c), Zhang et al. (2022e), Yu et al. (2022a), Han et al. (2023), Shao et al. (2023), Duan et al. (2023), Guan et al. (2022), Ling et al. (2022), Liu et al. (2022e), Pan et al. (2022), Wen et al. (2023), Xiao et al. (2022), Yang et al. (2023a), Duan et al. (2022b), Neng et al. (2023), Behyar and Shadjou (2021), Chen et al. (2023b), Jamieson et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022c), Li et al. (2022d), Luo et al. (2022), Ouyang et al. (2022), Peltomaa et al. (2022), Maashi (2023), Wang et al. (2022c), Wang et al. (2022d), Xiong et al. (2022a), Malahom et al. (2020), Zhang et al. (2020e) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Hua et al. (2021), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Nardo et al. (2021), Kumar et al. (2020b), Gaudin (2021), Uttpal et al. (2022), Bräuer et al. (2021)
Luminescence Key themes were the use of nanomaterials, doping for enhanced sensing, dual detection and eco-friendly materials Lian et al. (2020a), Yao et al. (2020), Yi and Zhang (2021), Badshah et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Jalili and Khataee (2020), Li et al. (2020e), Li et al. (2020h), Liao et al. (2021), Monago-Maraña et al. (2020), Suryoprabowo et al. (2021), Wang et al. (2020f), Wu et al. (2020c), Zhang et al. (2020d), Zhou et al. (2021), Harsha et al. (2020), Dai et al. (2022), Zhao et al. (2022b), Kushwaha et al. (2022), Duan et al. (2023), Guan et al. (2022), Ling et al. (2022), Liu et al. (2022e), Pan et al. (2022), Wen et al. (2023), Xiao et al. (2022), Yang et al. (2023a), Jindal and Kaur (2023), Anjali et al. (2022), Basterrechea et al. (2021), Hu et al. (2022a), Li et al. (2021b), Li et al. (2021c), Li et al. (2022e), Li et al. (2022f), Teng et al. (2023), Wang et al. (2022e), Wu et al. (2021b), Xie et al. (2022c), Xiong et al. (2022b), Yi and Zhang (2021), Zhou et al. (2022c), Zhou et al. (2023), Guo et al. (2020), Guo et al. (2021) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Tao et al. (2020), Cheng et al. (2021), Zhou et al. (2022a), Uttpal et al. (2022)
Raman Key themes were the use of dual detection and portability Vunckx et al. (2020), Cheng et al. (2020), Cupil-Garcia et al. (2020), Duan et al. (2020), He et al. (2020b), Jing et al. (2021), Li et al. (2020e), Neng et al. (2020), Sha et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020d), Li et al. (2020g), Wu et al. (2022c), Duan et al. (2022b), Neng et al. (2023), Vendamani et al. (2023), Goel et al. (2022), Cai et al. (2022a), Chang et al. (2022a), Alomar et al. (2022), Barveen et al. (2021), Chang et al. (2022b), Chen et al. (2023c), Huang et al. (2022b), Huang et al. (2022c), Jiang et al. (2021b), Jing et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022g), Lu et al. (2022), Mao et al. (2023), Sun et al. (2021), Wei et al. (2021), Yang et al. (2021b), Yang et al. (2022a), Yang et al. (2022b), Yang et al. (2022c), Yang et al. (2023b), Yu et al. (2022c), Yuan et al. (2022b), Zhu et al. (2021) Cheng et al. (2021), Xie et al. (2022a), Girmatsion et al. (2021), Zhang et al. (2022b)
Other Papers present the use of IR for rapid contaminant detection, graphene oxide-Fe3O4 for extraction of illegal dyes and an ad hoc review of MOFs in food safety sensors Fulgencio et al. (2022), Sha et al. (2021) Hitabatuma et al. (2022)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
Current on-site detection is carried out by authorities using portable spectrometers (i.e., Raman (TRUSCANRM, 2025) and IR (PerkinElmer, 2025)), Rapid testing kits (Hygiena, 2025; Food Allergen Testing, 2025; Merck, 2025; Hygiena, 2025; Food Allergen Testing, 2025; Merck, 2025) (i.e., colourimetric and lateral flow immunoassays) and UV lights (Coleparmer, 2025)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in food safety analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site food safety analysis.

Tasangtong et al. (2023) discuss inkjet-printed paper devices for rapid, portable and eco-friendly formaldehyde analysis in foods. Similarly, 3D-printing of graphene-polylactic acid electrodes for atropine detection in beverages offers low-cost, reproducible, large-scale sensor production and shows great promise for developing other electrochemical sensors for analytes commonly found at crime scenes (Joao et al., 2021).

Development of dual detection sensors was seen as key across publications. Roushani et al. (2021) discuss a double recognition strategy using MIP and aptamer on a carbon electrode to sense ractopamine, a molecule commonly used in livestock feed, sometimes inappropriately or excessively. This strategy can be extended to other target analytes by the simple exchange of the relevant aptamer. The paper also highlights antibiotic degradation detection in milk using silver nanoparticle-decorated TiO2 for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and SERS (Jing et al., 2021). SPME is a new sample preparation technique that simplifies extraction and reduces sample loss. Silver nanoparticles have greater SERS activity than traditional silver sol. In combination, SPME-SERS provides rapid on-site detection.

Antibody-based sensing technologies are common in food safety analysis offering low-cost and rapid detection. Development of a fluorescent immunochromatographic strip assay based on a chlorpheniramine (CPM) antibody in the detection of CPM, a harmful illegal additive in teas and health foods is discussed (Zhou et al., 2021). A LFIA based on a fluorescence and gold nanoparticles labelled antibody for Tadalafil (a banned additive found in beverages) recognition is also presented (Suryoprabowo et al., 2021). The strip is observed under ultra-violet light and can be completed within 10-min making it perfect for on-site analysis.

The responsibility of food safety analysis tends to rest with local authorities such as environmental health officers (EHOs) and the Food Standards Agency (FSA). With many potential target analytes there are a vast array of technologies currently employed. These include portable spectrometers such as Raman spectrometers (TRUSCANRM, 2025) and IR spectrometers (PerkinElmer, 2025) to identify contaminants and potential adulterants in food products. These products present issues of initial high investment costs and personnel training with the need for special sample preparation for some IR readings. Rapid testing kits, like ATP (adenosine triphosphate) Testing Kits (Hygiena, 2025) that measure cleanliness and Lateral flow devices (LFDs) (Food Allergen Testing, 2025) for rapid, on-site pathogen detection, often face issues of specificity which can result in false positives or negatives. Chemical test strips detect residues such as pesticides, heavy metals, and other contaminants but often suffer from limited sensitivity, provide only semi-quantitative results and require specific storage conditions (Merck, 2025). This is due to their small surface area and reaction zone which restrict the amount of analyte that can interact with reagents, and the absence of amplification steps commonly used in lab-based methods. UV lights are used to check hygiene standards and detect contamination with biological residues but these only work on smoother non-porous surfaces and require additional safety precautions due to potential prolonged UV exposure (Coleparmer, 2025).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Issues with the high cost and extensive training requirements for current spectrometers are being addressed by developing dual detectors (Roushani et al., 2021; Jing et al., 2021). Some identified dual detectors achieve similar levels of selectivity but require further development to match the sensitivity of current devices. Additionally, inkjet and 3D printed electrochemical devices are being researched as cost-effective, mass-producible alternatives (Tasangtong et al., 2023; Joao et al., 2021). Improvements in rapid testing kits also focus on dual detection, enhancing both specificity and sensitivity (Roushani et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021; Suryoprabowo et al., 2021).

3.2.10 Illicit drugs

Sensors play a pivotal role in illicit drug analysis for law enforcement, forensic investigations, public health and safety, enabling their identification, detection, and monitoring. 281 (36%) publications concerned illicit drug analysis, with electrochemical sensing technologies being the most popular (49% of papers). Colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and Raman sensing technologies represent an even share of the remaining publications. As shown in Table 9, the detection of some illicit drugs (e.g., stimulants) has received more attention than others (e.g., hallucinogens). The vast array of technologies explored for illicit drug analysis presents numerous opportunities for further research. Consequently, the key themes identified in the literature are summarized below.

TABLE 9

Sensing technology Drug category detected Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Depressants Papers look at eco-friendly materials, how to overcome interferants, portability and the use of nanomaterials Hu et al. (2020b), Li (2020), Ryu and Kim (2022), Ha et al. (2022), Kaewnu et al. (2021), Mustafa et al. (2021), Son et al. (2021)
Stimulants Papers look at portability, material innovation (e.g. metal nanoparticles), targeted detection but also the manipulation of developed technologies to detect other target analytes Silva and da Paixao (2022), Lin et al. (2023a), Cho and Kim (2022), Jang et al. (2022), Jornet-Martinez et al. (2021), Ameku et al. (2021), Adegoke et al. (2020) Khorablou et al. (2021), Ahmed et al. (2020)
Hallucinogen
Pharmaceuticals Papers look at novel detection materials such as Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles and carbon quantum dots alongside smartphone-based assay detection Shkembi et al. (2022), Madani-Nejad et al. (2023), Chu et al. (2020)
Dissociatives
Cannabinoids Papers have focussed on portability of affinity assays and the use of ionogel-based materials Puiu and Bala (2022), Catalan-Carrio et al. (2021)
Opioids Papers look at the use of recognition elements for charge transfer colourimetric detection and two ad hoc reviews are presented on advances in nanobiosensors for opioids and biosensing for rapid illicit drug detection Lin et al. (2021) Razlansari et al. (2022), Ahmed et al. (2020)
Other Papers have focussed on ad hoc reviews with key themes of portability and nanomaterials (magnetic nanoparticles, nanoplates and nanocomposites) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Chen et al. (2020c), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022)
Electrochemical Depressants Key themes were the use of graphene-based materials (enhancing sensitivity and selectivity), nano- and 2D- materials, portability and dual detection Jiang et al. (2023), Boroujerdi and Paul (2022a), de Lima and de Araujo (2022), Garima et al. (2022a), Mutz et al. (2022), Olean-Oliveira et al. (2023), Paschoarelli et al. (2023), Rocha et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2022a), Boroujerdi et al. (2020), Papadopoulos et al. (2020), Sohouli et al. (2020) Davis-Martin et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022)
Stimulants Key themes were the improvement of sensitivity and selectivity, portability, dual detection (particularly with MIPs) and nanomaterials Silva and da Paixao (2022), Hu et al. (2022b), Jiang et al. (2023), Atik et al. (2023), El-Akaad et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022h), Sposito et al. (2022), Wu et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2022d), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Takahashi et al. (2022), Abd-Elsabour et al. (2022), Abnous et al. (2022), Anvari et al. (2023), Borgul et al. (2022a), Borgul et al. (2022b), Castro et al. (2021), de Faria et al. (2022), Ghorbanizamani et al. (2022), González-Hernández et al. (2022a), Saisahas et al. (2022b), Lee et al. (2022c), Li et al. (2021d), Novais et al. (2022), Papaioannou et al. (2022), Pospisilová et al. (2023), Schram et al. (2022), Vargas et al. (2022), Wang et al. (2021d), Xu et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022f), Zhou et al. (2022d), Borgul et al. (2021), Ameku et al. (2021), Tan et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Couto et al. (2021), Liu et al. (2020b), Ruchala et al. (2021), Rocha et al. (2021b), Akgönüllü et al. (2020), Anvari et al. (2021), Haghighi et al. (2020), Lima et al. (2020), Nayini et al. (2020), Ott et al. (2020), Shishkanova et al. (2020), Yang et al. (2021c) Khorablou et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022), Almabadi et al. (2023), Bilge et al. (2022), Boroujerdi and Paul (2022b), Ahmed et al. (2020)
Hallucinogen Key themes were the use of dual detection (particularly MIPs) and portability Jiang et al. (2023), Li et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Vargas et al. (2022), Silva et al. (2021), Van Echelpoel et al. (2022), Van Echelpoel et al. (2023), Ribeiro et al. (2020), Amr et al. (2021) Brown and Dennany (2022)
Pharmaceuticals Key themes were the use of nanomaterials, eco-friendly materials, portability and improved sensitivity and selectivity Sposito et al. (2022), Sachdeva et al. (2021), Sanguarnsak et al. (2022), Borgul et al. (2021), Boroujerdi et al. (2022a), Dias et al. (2021), Düzmen and Aslanoglu (2022), Elbalkiny and Samir (2022), Kadhim et al. (2023), Pogăcean et al. (2022), Saisahas et al. (2022a), Wahba et al. (2023), Promsuwan et al. (2020b) Mostafa et al. (2022)
Dissociatives Papers focus on the detection of ketamine and other “date rape” drugs. Looking at MIPs, nanoparticles and the reusability and portability of devices Soliman et al. (2023), Rocha et al. (2021a), Zou et al. (2022b)
Cannabinoids Papers look at the problem of novel cannabinoid detection and how their constant development impacts their detection alongside the use of screen-printed electrodes with nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes Puiu and Bala (2022), Jiang et al. (2023), Ameen et al. (2022), Brenes et al. (2022), Pholsiri et al. (2023), Ameen et al. (2020), Klimuntowski et al. (2020) Brown and Dennany (2022), Amini et al. (2022)
Opioids Key themes were the use of multiplexing (simultaneous detection of multiple drugs), issues of interferents within samples, disposable sensors and an ad hoc review on current and future perspectives on opioid sensors Borgul et al. (2022c), González-Hernández et al. (2022b), Khorablou et al. (2022), Mousaabadi et al. (2022), Ortiz-Aguayo et al. (2022), Singh et al. (2022b), Wang et al. (2023b), Yang et al. (2022d) Glasscott et al. (2020), Choinska et al. (2022), Ahmed et al. (2020)
Other Key themes were the use of dual detection, printing of cells (paper and 3D printing), portability, nanomaterials and multiplexing Yu et al. (2023b), Ferreira et al. (2021b), Joosten et al. (2022), Parrilla et al. (2021), Parrilla et al. (2022), Poulladofonou et al. (2022), Zamani and Yamini (2023), Ceto et al. (2022), Sanli et al. (2020), Brown et al. (2020), Ataide et al. (2020), Noviana et al. (2019), Rocha et al. (2020), Shishkanova et al. (2021), Amr et al. (2021), De Rycke et al. (2020), Dragan et al. (2021), Ferrari et al. (2020), Li et al. (2021e), Masemola et al. (2020), Zanfrognini et al. (2020), Montali et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Mani et al. (2021), Amiri et al. (2021), Teymourian et al. (2020), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022), Castro et al. (2022), Dai (2023), Ren et al. (2021), Su (2022)2
Immunoassay Depressants Papers look at the use of MIPs and carbon-dot technologies alongside the development of wearable sensors for continuous monitoring Hu et al. (2020b), Yen et al. (2020), Jiang et al. (2023)
Stimulants Key themes were the use of dual detection (with electrochemical and fluorescent/ optical technologies), multiplexing (derivatisation-assisted immunoassay for group-specific detection) and portability Lin et al. (2023a), Hu et al. (2022b), Jiang et al. (2023), Atik et al. (2023), El-Akaad et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022h), Sposito et al. (2022), Wu et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2022d), Esmaelpourfarkhani et al. (2023), Paul et al. (2021), Zamanian et al. (2022), Geng et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2021a), Morita et al. (2022), Zhao et al. (2022c), Tan et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Couto et al. (2021), Liu et al. (2020b), Grothe et al. (2021) Lal et al. (2022)
Hallucinogen Papers look at nanomaterial modification such as incorporation of graphene oxide for enhanced sensor performance, conductivity and stability. Selective detection of the target analyte was also covered for accurate and reliable detection in complex samples Jiang et al. (2023), Li et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a)
Pharmaceuticals Papers focus on dual detection with nandrolone aptamers for colourimetric detection (steroids), MIPs for electrochemical sensing of diltiazem (high blood pressure treatment) and fluorescence polarisation immunoassay for amitriptyline (antidepressant) Shkembi et al. (2022), Sposito et al. (2022), Medyantseva et al. (2022)
Dissociatives Looks at the use of core-shell MIPs for on-site selective determination of ketamine Soliman et al. (2023)
Cannabinoids Papers look at the use of nanomaterials such as nanocellulose and graphene oxide Jiang et al. (2023), Solin et al. (2023), Balaban et al. (2020)
Opioids Papers look at multiplexed detection for fentanyl and its analogues and for multiple narcotics or explosives at once using a biosensor array. Papers also examine dual detection and detection in human matrices, specifically highlighting the utilization of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) in conjunction with an immunochromatographic assays for morphine detection in saliva Canoura et al. (2023), Scorsone et al. (2021), Li et al. (2020)
Other Key themes were dual detection, eco-friendly materials (enzyme-based paper tests), drug monitoring in waste-water and interferents Yan et al. (2022), Gozdzialski et al. (2023), Sanli et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2020d), Wille and Elliott (2021), Zinna et al. (2020), Senra and Fonseca (2021), Garcia-Cruz et al. (2020), Badawy (2020), Suherman et al. (2020), Truta et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Nardo et al. (2021), Mao et al. (2021a), Rary et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2020), Santillo (2020), Bräuer et al. (2021), Soni et al. (2022b)
Luminescence Depressants Papers look at advanced materials (nanostructured photonic hydrogels, AIE active fluorene-containing compounds, and graphene materials), on-site monitoring and specificity towards intended target analytes Ryu and Kim (2022), Ahmed et al. (2022), Dahiwadkar et al. (2022), Garima et al. (2022b), Garrido et al. (2023) Brown and Dennany (2022)
Stimulants Key themes were dual detection (quantum dots, aptamers, metal-organic frameworks), ultrasensitive detection and novel materials Hu et al. (2022b), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Takahashi et al. (2022), Esmaelpourfarkhani et al. (2023), Paul et al. (2021), Zamanian et al. (2022), Adegoke et al. (2023), Ding et al. (2021b), Elmizadeh et al. (2023), Guo et al. (2022a), Tan et al. (2022), Ruchala et al. (2021), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Jeong et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020e), Zhang and Yan (2020), Zhao et al. (2020b), Mittal et al. (2020) Khorablou et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022)
Hallucinogen Papers look at the use of silica nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent dye for detection of novel psychedelic drug and an ad hoc review is presented on the use of electrochemiluminescence sensors for drug detection Garrido et al. (2020) Brown and Dennany (2022)
Pharmaceuticals Key themes were dual detection, nanomaterials, specificity, portability (through miniaturisation) and functionalised surfaces Sachdeva et al. (2021), Sanguarnsak et al. (2022), Medyantseva et al. (2022), Adegoke et al. (2022), Al-Hetlani et al. (2020)
Dissociatives
Cannabinoids Papers look at the portability of affinity assays and the screening of samples in herbal mixtures (interferents present) with gold nanoclusters Puiu and Bala (2022), Yen et al. (2022a) Brown and Dennany (2022)
Opioids Papers look at the use of nanobiosensors with nanomaterials and bio-recognition elements for high sensitivity and selectivity alongside considering interferents that will be found in real samples and the potential for multiplexing Yan et al. (2023), Scorsone et al. (2021), Alhaddad and Sheta (2020) Razlansari et al. (2022)
Other Key themes were portability and nanomaterials Yu et al. (2023b), Yan et al. (2022), Warning et al. (2021), Chen et al. (2023d), Pal et al. (2023), Wei et al. (2022), Yen et al. (2022b), Brown et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2020d), Montali et al. (2020) Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022), Hang et al. (2022), Loch et al. (2023)
Raman Depressants Papers look at nanomaterials, discussing nanosheets and nanocluster formation, alongside the need for rapid and sensitive detection Chen et al. (2021b), Sha et al. (2020), Açikgöz and Hamamci (2020), Wang et al. (2021e)
Stimulants Key themes were nanomaterials, multiplexing and machine learning (for complex detection scenarios), portability and removal of the need for pre-treatment González-Hernández et al. (2022a), Geng et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2021b), Atta and Tuan (2023), Chio et al. (2021), Hong et al. (2022), Mao et al. (2021d), Wang et al. (2022f), Ye et al. (2023), Alder et al. (2021), Fang et al. (2020), Liyanage et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2021d), Picone et al. (2020), Smith et al. (2021) Mao et al. (2021c)
Hallucinogen Looks at the detection of drugs in urine through the rapid formation of Ag nanoclusters Chen et al. (2021b)
Pharmaceuticals Papers look at the need for SERS techniques capable of handling real-world samples and the use of nanomaterials (MOF-gold core-satellite nanostructure and Au-coated Si nano-cone) for label-free, portable SERS Boroujerdi et al. (2022b), Fan et al. (2022), Ren et al. (2022)
Dissociatives Papers look at π-metal interaction for co-assembly enabling ultratrace detection and identification of a novel norketamine precursor Ding et al. (2023), Yen et al. (2022c)
Cannabinoids Looks at the detection of drugs in urine through the rapid formation of Ag nanoclusters Chen et al. (2021b)
Opioids Key themes were nanomaterials, interferents (complex samples), quantitative detection and portability Ding et al. (2023), Li et al. (2023c), Su et al. (2023), Zhang et al. (2021d), Zhao et al. (2022d), Li et al. (2020), Liyanage et al. (2020), Akçan et al. (2020), Fedick et al. (2020), Han et al. (2021), Ye et al. (2021)
Other Key themes were nanomaterials, portability, dual detection and eco-friendly materials Gozdzialski et al. (2023), Cai et al. (2022a), Atta and Vo-Dinh (2023), Azimi and Docoslis (2022), Zhang et al. (2022g), Goel et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2021e), Wille and Elliott (2021), Vunckx et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020d), Burr et al. (2020), Han et al. (2020), Zhang et al. (2020g), Zhu et al. (2020) Hang et al. (2022)
Other Depressants Papers look at near IR for differentiation of new psychoactive substances and a review of ethanol intoxication sensing technologies is presented. A systematic review for drug-facilitated sexual assault monitoring is also presented Kranenburg et al. (2022a) Paprocki et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2021)
Stimulants Papers look at a variety of detection technologies including surface plasmon resonance and focus on extraction in complex media Kranenburg et al. (2022a), Far et al. (2022), Qiu et al. (2023), Yao et al. (2022b), Özgür et al. (2020)
Hallucinogen Papers look at near IR and the influence of water of crystallisation Kranenburg et al. (2022a), Kranenburg et al. (2023)
Pharmaceuticals Papers look at asthma inhaler use via terahertz spectroscopy and a β-cyclodextrin holographic sensor for ibuprofen detection Tyree et al. (2023), Yu et al. (2023c)
Dissociatives A systematic review for drug-facilitated sexual assault monitoring is presented Soni et al. (2021)
Cannabinoids Paper looks at near IR for differentiation of new psychoactive substances Kranenburg et al. (2022a)
Opioids Paper looks at polyanionoic cylcodextrins in the detection of fentanyl Mayer et al. (2023)
Other Key themes were nanomaterials, portability and interferents Dahiya et al. (2022), Díez-Pascual et al. (2022), Alonzo et al. (2022), Kranenburg et al. (2022b), Kranenburg et al. (2022c), Rui et al. (2023), Hung et al. (2022), Rahman et al. (2020) Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Senesi et al. (2021), Moradi et al. (2022), Yeasmin et al. (2022), Zubrycka et al. (2022)
Currently used by UK police and authorities
Current on-site testing for powdered, liquid or pill samples use NIK tests (ProPublica, 2025; Symonsbergen et al., 2018). For analysis in saliva and sweat the UK police use DrugWipe (lateral flow immunoassay detection) (DrugWipe, 2025)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in illicit drug analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site illicit drug analysis.

3.2.10.1 Portability, Affordability and ease of use

Key to successful implementation of roadside drug testing is portability, with many review papers (Teymourian et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2021; Moradi et al., 2022) suggesting further work that needs to be done to achieve this.

SERS technology on a paper-based substrate enables on-site detection, such as for fentanyl citrate in serum and urine. This method utilises a paper-based SERS substrate embedded with chloride ion treated gold nanospheres, with SERS spectra collected using a portable Raman spectrometer (Han et al., 2021).

The development of a fluorescence immunochromatographic assay (FICA) strip reader provides low cost, user-friendly, highly sensitive and rapid detection capabilities, enabling convenient on-site testing (Wu et al., 2021a). This sensor incorporates a photoelectric adjustment system, leveraging the linear correlation between fluorescence and excitation light intensity, enabling precise tuning of the excitation light intensity. Such adjustment broadens the potential detection range for target analytes. This technology will have implications in many sensing devices for various target analytes on-site.

Truta et al. (2020) show that electrochemical methods can rapidly determine drugs with rapid, sensitive, selective detection in complex human matrices (e.g., blood, urine or saliva) and are easily miniaturised for on-site use. However, the electrochemical sensing of illicit drugs so far has been limited to academic research–no commercial market appears to have been conquered yet. Square-wave voltammetry (SWV) is the most widely used voltammetry technology for facile and rapid quantitative sensing of illicit drugs (De Rycke et al., 2020). The choice of electrode, especially the working electrode, can have a large impact on a sensor’s sensitivity. De Rycke et al. (2020) predict that carbon paste electrodes will further gain popularity and be used in most electrochemical sensors for the detection of illicit drugs as they are flexible in design with the possibility for miniaturisation. The presence on the market of cheap and disposable electrochemical cells, namely, screen-printed electrodes, has made feasible the creation of effective devices for the quantification of illicit drugs in an on-site screening test (Zanfrognini et al., 2020).

Nanomaterials, with their unique properties and low cost, enhance electrochemical sensor sensitivity for detecting drugs in low concentrations (Truta et al., 2020). However, future electrochemical sensor development needs to consider the implementation of biocompatible and environmentally friendly materials (Klimuntowski et al., 2020). Many articles discuss the potential of paper-based portable sensors to aid police enforcement (Noviana et al., 2019; Sha et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021; Ameku et al., 2021; Rocha et al., 2021a; Ribeiro et al., 2020; Dias et al., 2021; Saisahas et al., 2022a; Pholsiri et al., 2023; Ataide et al., 2020; Solin et al., 2023; Alder et al., 2021; Mao et al., 2021c). Cellulose is also discussed as a potential low-cost, environmentally friendly supporting material for biosensors, whose high number of hydroxyl functional groups provide the ability for the construction of novel materials for new advanced biosensor-based applications (Kamel and Khattab, 2020).

A pivotal review article surveys literature spanning the last 2 decades, focusing on optical and electrochemical sensing technologies for analysing methamphetamine (Khorablou et al., 2021). Many low-cost sensing technologies have been outlined from fluorescence to electro-chemiluminescence highlighting the range of existing and potential low-cost sensing platforms for methamphetamine. Application of these developed sensing technologies to other drug sensing provides a low-cost, high-yield route for further sensing development.

To reduce errors of inference by non-experts (i.e., most police officers do not have chemistry degrees), on-site drug tests would need to be simple to operate and interpret. Therefore, recent publications for on-site testing have focused on the simplification of current systems. Research includes the design of data processing software to simplify measurements (Noviana et al., 2019), potential for smartphone control of sensors (Madani-Nejad et al., 2023), and the development of smartphone apps for interpreting data (Garcia-Cruz et al., 2020).

3.2.10.2 Matrix tolerance and interferents

Roadside drug sensors will require detection in a human matrix which introduces issues of interference and may require sample pre-treatment (Zanfrognini et al., 2020). Therefore, testing in a greater range of potential matrices to make technologies field ready is attractive (Papadopoulos et al., 2020). Electro-chemiluminescent screening using a Nafion film on a glassy carbon electrode is a sensing technique that requires little to no extraction or sample preparation. This provides ideal implementation for on-site screening in serum, urine and saliva (Dokuzparmak et al., 2021). Saliva-based drug detection is of particular interest for on-site screening, as unlike blood assays, it does not require invasive sample collection (Truta et al., 2020). Selective discrimination of illicit drugs and their metabolites is a key theme to be explored for many sensing devices (Gill et al., 2020).

3.2.10.3 Specificity

For roadside drug testing, high specificity is needed to ensure the fair apprehension of suspects. Many drugs, due to degradation (Truta et al., 2020), are identified through their metabolites in body fluids (Wille and Elliott, 2021). Technologies outlined to improve specificity include the use of novel recognition elements such as aptamers (Ahmed et al., 2020) – which provide a cheap method to bind to target groups enabling sensing–and the combination of two sensor elements. For example, molecularly imprinted polymers and graphene quantum dots as a signal amplifier offer a revolution in sensor design by increasing surface area and conductivity (Khorablou et al., 2021).

3.2.10.4 Multiplexing

Multiplex detection is increasingly important, allowing simultaneous analysis of multiple analytes (Mani et al., 2021; De Rycke et al., 2020; Klimuntowski et al., 2020). This will be vital for on-site drug tests as there are many potential target drugs that need to be identified. Paper-based sensors have the potential for multiplexed detection and will be important for on-site application (Noviana et al., 2019). Lateral flow tests provide rapidity, simplicity, relative cost-effectiveness, and the possibility to be used by non-skilled personnel. However, drawbacks include possible cross-reactivity, matrix interference and (easy) manipulation by users (e.g., the use of soda to cause a false positive). A lateral flow immunoassay combines multiple lines to increase detection capability, where each line contains a specific recognition element for different target analytes. However, the addition of multiple recognition sites and therefore lateral flow lines requires an increased sample volume, higher fabrication costs and increased reagent use (Nardo et al., 2021).

The importance of illicit drug analysis in combating crime is evidenced by the volume of publications identified and the variety of sensing technologies used. From the above analysis it is evident that portability, specificity, matrix tolerance and multiplexing are key components that require further research for a commercial on-site drug test. It is observed that low-cost, simply operated, portable devices are being developed, including paper-based devices requiring little to no extraction and sample preparation. Advances are also being made to increase detection limits and reduce costs, with a focus on saliva-based detection. However, more research is needed particularly in the discrimination between certain target analytes including amphetamine type stimulants. This is particularly critical as often in illicit drug analysis the target is unknown and therefore determination of its exact identity is important. Portable sensor development should involve environmentally friendly materials and the use of nanomaterials alongside the development of software for the extraction of data. The specificity of the sensor will be vital and an understanding of drug concentrations, half-life and metabolites in the matrix will also be key. Electrochemical sensing, particularly SWV, has yet to impact the commercial market for mass on-site detection but its relative cheapness, ease of use and sensitivity make it ideal.

With the focus on low cost testing we are looking at detecting drug offenses on-site. For example, identifying those under the influence with drug driving, drink spiking and identifying samples rapidly. Specific drug detection kits used by the UK police for on-site analysis vary depending on factors such as region, budget of the police force and advancements of technology (Evidential Drug Identification Testing, 2023).

UK police use various kits for on-site drug analysis, such as NIK tests for powders, pills, or liquids (Symonsbergen et al., 2018). These reagent tests including Marquis (MDMA), Mandelin (MDMA, opiates), Scott (cocaine), and Simons (MDMA, methamphetamine) utilize colorimetric methods and are popular for their ease of use and quick results. However, they have limitations. Their sensitivity and specificity are restricted, leading to potential false positives or negatives due to interference from other substances. This means they may miss low concentrations of drugs or misidentify substances, necessitating confirmatory testing for accurate results (ProPublica, 2025). Additionally, these tests typically only cover a limited range of drugs, potentially missing emerging substances. This necessitates the use of multiple tests or techniques to accurately identify the presence and type of drugs in a sample, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive for law enforcement agencies.

For drug driving analysis in saliva and sweat, the UK police currently use the Securetech & Dreiger (DrugWipe (DrugWipe, 2025)) sensor to detect cannabis and cocaine. DrugWipe employs a lateral flow immunoassay detection system based on the principle of competitive binding. An anti-drug antibody binds either to a protein conjugate line, forming a visible test line, or to the target drug, if present, reducing the appearance of the test line (DrugWipe, 2025). This technology has type approval (Testler, 2025), indicating it meets the specifications required by the Home Office. However, having roadside evidential screening that allows the analysis to be used as court evidence would be beneficial for the police.

Therefore, current on-site drug detection kits provide only preliminary results, requiring confirmatory testing by certified laboratories - often using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) - for legal purposes, leading to additional costs and delays in proceedings (ProPublica, 2025).

Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. The need to detect a broader range of drugs is addressed with research into dual detection methods, such as FICA strip readers, enabling the detection of multiple drugs simultaneously (Wu et al., 2021a). Lateral flow immunoassays are being investigated for multiplexing capabilities, although further research is required to reduce matrix interference (Nardo et al., 2021). Enhancements in specificity are being explored through the use of aptamers, MIPs and quantum dots (Khorablou et al., 2021; Ahmed et al., 2020). To overcome current issues related to matrix tolerance, technologies such as electro-chemiluminescent screening are also being researched (Dokuzparmak et al., 2021).

3.2.11 Other

Only 35 (5%) publications meeting the inclusion criteria did not focus on specific target analytes, affirming the appropriateness of chosen key analyte categories. These publications included a fairly even split of the sensing technology categories (Tables 9, 10).

TABLE 10

Sensing technology Description Research papers Review papers
Colourimetric Papers look at eco-friendly materials with paper-based microfluidic devices and a focus on nanomaterials Musile et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Dang et al. (2022) Costanzo et al. (2023)
Electrochemical Key themes were nanomaterials monolayer-protected gold nanoparticles, 2D materials, graphite electrodes, 3D electrodes, and wireless wearable electrochemical sensors and eco-friendly materials low-cost stencil printing of graphite electrodes Kajale et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Dang et al. (2022), Kongkaew et al. (2022) Abdelkader et al. (2022), Abdulhussein et al. (2022), Alves et al. (2021)
Immunoassay Papers look at pH-switchable nanozymes and paper-based devices Musile et al. (2021), Liang et al. (2023) Alberti et al. (2023)
Luminescence Key themes were multiplexing, portability and ad hoc reviews looking at fluorescent chemical sensors, sulfonamides and nanomaterials Shah et al. (2023), Musile et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022h), Calabretta et al. (2021), Zhao et al. (2021), Gasser et al. (2022) Costanzo et al. (2023), Fakayode et al. (2023), Batool et al. (2022b)
Raman Key themes were portability, novel substrates and ad hoc reviews saliva studies and progress in SERS scattering molecular sensing Guo et al. (2022b), Pliatsikas et al. (2021), Parungao et al. (2022), Aleknavicene et al. (2022), Fularz et al. (2021), Khinevich et al. (2021), Lin et al. (2023b), Zhang et al. (2022b), Zhao et al. (2021) Hardy et al. (2022), Mandal and Tewari (2022)
Other Papers look at smartphone-based sensors, carbon dots and microfluidic designs Kim et al. (2022), Ross et al. (2023), Khayal et al. (2021), Liu and Niu (2022), Marques et al. (2023) Kulkarni et al. (2022), Geballa-Koukoula et al. (2023)

Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in target analytes not covered by the outlined categories.

Many publications focussed on the detection of radioactive materials (Marques et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2022). Studies highlighted the advantages of silicon photomultipliers in beta and gamma detectors over current radiation monitors used at seaports, citing their lightweight, compact design, and lower power consumption (Marques et al., 2023). Emphasis was placed on developing environmentally friendly alternatives to current sensing technologies, including sustainable printed electrochemical platforms (Kongkaew et al., 2022) and paper-based microfluidic devices (Musile et al., 2021). Portability emerged as a key theme, with innovations such as a mobile fibre-optics Raman spectrometer addressing challenges of dispersive Raman spectroscopy and potentially enabling mobile spectroscopy applications, such as for elephant ivory (Parungao et al., 2022). Additionally, several ad hoc reviews were identified (Costanzo et al., 2023; Abdelkader et al., 2022; Abdulhussein et al., 2022; Alves et al., 2021; Alberti et al., 2023; Fakayode et al., 2023; Batool et al., 2022b; Hardy et al., 2022; Mandal and Tewari, 2022; Kulkarni et al., 2022; Geballa-Koukoula et al., 2023), covering diverse topics such as 3D electrodes in electrochemical sensing (Abdelkader et al., 2022), SERS studies on saliva (Hardy et al., 2022) and advances in SERS for molecular sensing (Mandal and Tewari, 2022).

3.2.12 UK crime statistics (2022)

Combining our systematic review findings with knowledge of current sensing devices and their limitations, along with an understanding of the volume and economic impact of various crime types, enables the identification of critical gaps where further research could significantly enhance crime prevention and response efforts.

In the UK during 2022, there were 498,381 reports of criminal damage and arson, with arson estimated at 10%–15% of cases, translating to 53,000 to 79,500 arson incidents (Criminal Damage and Arson Crime and Safety Statistics, 2025; Official Statistics, 2025). Firearms offenses totalled 5,850 (CENSUS, 2023), while counterfeit currency offenses totalled 5,600 (Ministry of Justice, 2023). Waste crime, prosecuted by the Environment Agency, costs the economy approximately £1 billion annually, leading to nearly 100 prosecutions (Environmentagency, 2023). DNA profiling aided in solving 22,477 cases, including 550 rapes and 644 homicides (Corporate Report, 2023). Explosives-related offenses totalled 348 (Corporate Report, 2023), and poisonings with intent to harm numbered 105 (Office for National Statistics, 2022). Fingerprint evidence led to 22,000 matches, solving 8,472 burglaries, 3,409 vehicle crimes, and 1,529 instances of criminal damage (Corporate Report, 2022). 610 reported food safety cases were potentially up to 3,050 due to underreporting, with a financial impact of up to £1.96 billion (Food Standards Agency, 2025b; Food Standards Agency, 2025c; Food Safety News, 2025; Food Standards Agency, 2025a). Drug-related offenses reached 200,000, with a 21% increase in drug seizures compared to 2021 (Official Statistics, 2022). In 2022, UK roadside drug wipes increased to 6,273 from 4,668 in 2021, with 53.6% testing positive (NPCC, 2025), while drink/drug driving convictions rose 40% from 2014, making drug driving a growing concern (Drug Testing Clinics, 2025).

These statistics underscore the varied impacts of different crimes, guiding the focus of future research efforts. In the UK, gunshot and counterfeit crimes had minimal impact, consistent with the low number of related SR publications. Conversely, explosives cases were fewer than expected from the SR, but their economic and social impact can be severe, justifying further research. Poisoning cases were also surprisingly low, possibly due to the narrow focus of available crime statistics indicating a need for more comprehensive data on poisons and toxins.

Pollutant and food safety crimes, though reported less frequently, have a substantial economic impact, advocating for increased research attention. Comprehensive crime statistics on body fluids remain elusive, but DNA profiling highlights numerous severe cases such as homicides and rapes, showing significant potential for combating crime. Despite this, the low number of included publications in the SR suggests insufficient research in this area. It is unclear if this is due to sufficient existing sensing devices or a research gap needing exploration, warranting further investigation.

Fire-related crimes are numerous but underrepresented in included SR publications, suggesting current technologies may suffice. Fingerprint analysis accounts for a significant number of crimes and 14% of SR publications, justifying continued research efforts.

Drug-related crimes, comprising 36% of included SR publications, have seen a dramatic increase, particularly in drug driving offenses. The substantial volume of research and crime statistics in this area indicates a significant impact and underscores the need for continued and enhanced research efforts to address drug-related crime effectively.

4 Conclusion

This report offers a concise analysis of recent advancements in low-cost sensing technologies for crime reduction, based on a systematic review. Analysis of publication trends indicates substantial growth in research focused on sensors for combating crime (125% increase in included publication numbers from 2017 to 2022). Taking stock of the literature, as was done here using a systematic approach, is thus important to identify trends and research gaps that should be pursued.

Included publications were categorised into the analytes that they targeted (illicit drugs, fingerprints, explosives, body fluids, food safety, poisons and toxins, pollutants, counterfeits and documentation, fire, gunshot and other) and the types of sensing technology used (high cost: mass spectrometry, PCR, HPLC and low cost: electrochemical, colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and SERS). The proportion of publications from each target analyte category remained fairly constant over the period reviewed. However, an increase was seen in the dominance of the field by the four main categories (illicit drugs, food safety, fingerprints and poisons and toxins) and an increase in particular in the dominance of illicit drug publications. In fact, more than one-third (36%) of all publications related to the analysis of illicit drugs, of which 30% focussed on stimulant abuse.

Particular attention was given to articles published from 2020 onwards, reflecting the rapid technological advancements in this area, and to articles focussing on low-cost technologies, which are argued to be most impactful in crime reduction efforts. This further detailed analysis (782 documents) revealed trends in specific areas such as illicit drug detection, where stimulants and opioids were prominent subjects. Technologies like electrochemical and luminescence sensors showed promise for creating accessible, user-friendly testing devices.

The current challenges associated with the sensing devices used by UK police and authorities were reviewed, offering insights into how ongoing research identified through the SR may address these issues. A summary of key findings follows.

Fire Analysis: UK police and fire services collaborate using tools such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), fire investigation dogs, and thermal imaging cameras. Issues include the need for portable GC-MS and the limitations of canine detection. Research into portable MOx sensors shows promise for rapid on-site analysis.

Gunshot Residue (GSR) Detection: Current methods, like colourimetric spot tests, face issues of low specificity and sample degradation. Field-deployable scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and electrochemical methods under development show potential for improved specificity and cost-effectiveness.

Counterfeit Detection: Techniques like UV and infrared light, magnetic ink detectors, and portable spectrometers are used to identify counterfeit items. However, false positives and sophisticated counterfeiting techniques pose challenges. Advances in colourimetric and luminescent sensing and magnetic nanoclusters offer improved detection capabilities.

Pollutant Measurement: Instruments like GC-MS, Raman spectrometers, photoionization detectors (PIDs), and x-ray fluorescence analysers (XRF) are used to detect pollutants. Issues include high costs, maintenance, and limited detection capabilities. Research into economical materials and dual detection methods shows promise for enhanced analyte detection.

Body Fluid Identification: Sensors such as luminol, Rapid Stain Identification (RSID) tests, and portable DNA analysers are used to detect body fluids at crime scenes. Challenges include false positives, DNA degradation, and high costs. Research into eco-friendly materials and dual detection techniques offers potential solutions.

Explosive Detection: Portable detectors, canine units, and colourimetric kits are used for on-site explosive detection. Current challenges include high costs, false positives, and limited detectable compounds. Research into dual detection methods and 3D printed electrodes for electrochemical sensors aims to address these issues.

Poison and Toxin Identification: Technologies such as portable spectrometers and biosensors are used for on-site detection. Issues include high costs, environmental stability, and limited detection range. Advances in AIE probes and paper-based methods show potential for cost-effective and comprehensive detection.

Fingerprint Detection: MobileID devices and various powders are used for on-site fingerprint detection. Current limitations include sensitivity to environmental conditions and the need for extensive training. Research into nanomaterials offers enhanced sensitivity and selectivity for fingerprint detection.

Food Safety Analysis: Local authorities use portable spectrometers, rapid testing kits, chemical test strips, and UV lights for food safety. Challenges include high costs, specificity issues, and the need for special sample preparation. Research into dual detectors and printed electrochemical devices aims to improve cost-effectiveness and sensitivity.

Illicit Drug Detection: UK police use NIK tests and DrugWipe sensors for on-site drug detection. Current limitations include sensitivity, specificity, and the need for confirmatory testing. Advances in dual detection methods, lateral flow immunoassays, and electro-chemiluminescent screening are being explored to enhance specificity and matrix tolerance.

An analysis of the prevalence of different crime types and their social and economic impacts identified research gaps that could significantly enhance crime prevention. Gunshot, counterfeit, explosives and poisoning analyses were found to have a minimal impact on UK crime compared to other analytes. While improvements in sensing for these areas would be beneficial, they should not be the primary focus in the UK at present. Pollutant and food safety analytes, though less frequently reported in crime statistics, have a substantial economic impact, indicating significant benefits from further research. The number of crimes involving body fluid analysis, particularly DNA profiling, is substantial. However, the relatively low number of related SR publications included indicates either a research gap or the adequacy of existing sensing devices. The review of SR publications relating to body fluids reveals many areas where further research is and would be beneficial, underscoring that there are significant research gaps that need to be addressed. Illicit drug-related crimes, especially drug driving, have significantly increased in recent years, comprising 36% of included SR publications. This highlights the urgent need for continued and enhanced research efforts to address these issues effectively.

Overall, the review highlights significant progress in low-cost sensing technologies for crime reduction, addressing key challenges and proposing innovative solutions for more efficient and effective crime detection and analysis. These advancements indicate promising pathways for enhancing crime detection and public safety through accessible, reliable sensing technologies. Future efforts should focus on refining dual detection methods, reducing matrix interference, and fostering collaboration between academia and law enforcement for effective implementation.

This systematic review of sensing technologies to combat crime is intended to provide policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and researchers with a comprehensive and timely evaluation of existing research, guiding strategic decisions on technology adoption and resource allocation. By identifying gaps and future research directions, the review is also intended to stimulate innovation and development of advanced sensing tools, crucial for combating sophisticated criminal activities.

5 Future outlooks

5.1 Study limitations

This work has provided a systematic review and detailed understanding of the existing sensing technologies for combating crime and key gaps in the literature where further work would be beneficial.

5.1.1 Systematic review

Although a systematic approach was taken here to ensure repeatability and extensive coverage, there is a possibility that the search terms used, or the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria may have resulted in relevant studies being missed or excluded. Moreover, journal space limitations preclude the discussion of all insights extracted from the included studies. For example, a summary of the methods used in every publication for each analyte category would provide more understanding of the existing literature but would increase the length of the review significantly.

5.1.2 Other languages and countries

This review only included publications written in English, which means studies from non-English-speaking countries may have been excluded. This limitation highlights the potential loss of key publications and suggests that the findings of this systematic review might not be universally applicable. Engaging with international stakeholders and experts could help address this limitation and ensure a more comprehensive understanding.

5.2 Future directions

5.2.1 Patent search

Alongside a search of academic databases, it would be beneficial to search recent patent applications and grants relating to sensors utilised for combating crime. The same key search queries can be used to search databases such as Google Patents and Derwent Innovations. This will outline the most recent sensing technologies that are currently being developed and may indicate further key gaps and avenues for future beneficial research.

5.2.2 Low hanging fruit

Low hanging fruit arguably represent the best directions for further research that will allow the rapid and easy development of mass producible sensors to combat crime. To expedite advancements in sensing technologies for crime detection, focusing on integrating AI and IoT for enhanced data analysis and connectivity is paramount. Concurrently, investing in advanced materials like nanomaterials and conductive polymers can significantly improve sensor performance while reducing production costs and environmental impact. Standardising portable designs and enabling multiplexed detection capabilities are also crucial for practical deployment. Lastly, fostering collaborations between stakeholders, law enforcement officials, and government science technology agencies will accelerate the translation of research innovations into commercial products, ensuring robustness, scalability, and regulatory compliance of next-generation sensing devices.

5.2.3 Manufacture of a sensor

The overarching aim in creating this SR was to, alongside an understanding of current developments, understand gaps in the literature for further research. Further research in these areas should ultimately lead to the creation of a low-cost, portable sensing device that can be used for its chosen analyte to combat crime by its mass manufacture and deployment. Considerations of long-term storage, matrix tolerance and approval from law enforcement agencies will be vital.

5.2.4 Global megatrend

A global megatrend is a large-scale, sustained shift in major social, economic, environmental, technological, or geopolitical patterns that significantly transforms multiple industries and aspects of life over decades (PwC, 2025; META, 2016). This therefore makes it an important consideration when looking at further research into sensors to combat crime.

The global megatrend for sensors to combat crime encompass advancements in AI, IoT, and big data, which are enhancing the capabilities and integration of these technologies. Urbanization and connectivity improvements, particularly through 5G and cloud computing, are driving the adoption and effectiveness of sensors to combat crime. Economic, social, and environmental considerations further shape the development and deployment of these systems, highlighting the need for cost-effective, ethical, and resilient solutions in combating crime.

5.2.5 Sustainable development goals

The Sustainable Development Goals are pivotal in addressing global challenges by promoting equity and sustainability through interconnected goals and specific 2030 targets, thereby fostering international cooperation and accountability (United Nations, 2025). Therefore, considering these goals is essential when exploring further research into sensing devices to combat crime.

Research in this field not only drives technological advancements (Goal 9) but also contributes to achieving societal goals such as safety, justice, and sustainable urban development (Goals 11 and 16). Furthermore, ensuring the ethical deployment and use of sensor technologies aligns with the overarching principles of sustainable development, emphasizing inclusivity, safety, and justice for all (Goal 17).

5.2.6 Emerging technologies

Rapid advancements in sensor technology mean that newer studies may use more advanced sensors not covered in older reviews. Keeping reviews up-to-date with the latest technologies and applications is challenging but crucial. Whilst this SR aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of sensing technologies for combating crime, future reviews may benefit from focusing separately on specific target analytes to achieve a more nuanced understanding and detailed analysis.

Statements

Author contributions

AC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SJ: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. T-CL: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the EPSRC and Dawes Centre for Future crimes at UCL, grant reference number (EP/N509577/1 and EP/T517793/1).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the EPSRC, the Dawes Centre for Future Crimes at UCL and the Institute for Materials Discovery that funded and supported the research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2025.1568867/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1.^TargetZero is an initiative to reduce the number of traffic deaths and serious injuries to zero by 2030.

References

  • 1

    Abdelkader M. Elmanzalawy M. Pauliukaite R. (2022). 3-D electrodes for electrochemical sensors: review in different approaches. IEEE Sens. J.22 (24), 2362023632. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3220815

  • 2

    Abd-Elsabour M. Alsoghier H. M. Alhamzani A. G. Abou-Krisha M. M. Yousef T. A. Assaf H. F. (2022). A novel electrochemical sensor for detection of nicotine in tobacco products based on graphene oxide nanosheets conjugated with (1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid) modified glassy carbon electrode. Nanomaterials12 (14), 2354. 10.3390/nano12142354

  • 3

    Abdollahi A. Dashti A. Rahmanidoust M. Hanaei N. (2022). Metal-free and ecofriendly photoluminescent nanoparticles for visualization of latent fingerprints, anticounterfeiting, and information encryption. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL372, 132649. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132649

  • 4

    Abdulhussein S. K. Al-Kazazz F. F. M. Rheima A. M. (2022). The role of nanomaterials in the recent development of electrochemical biosensors. Port. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA41 (3), 211221. 10.4152/pea.2023410303

  • 5

    Abel R. J. Zadora G. Sandercock P. M. L. Harynuk J. J. (2018). Modern instrumental limits of identification of ignitable liquids in forensic fire debris analysis. Separations5 (4), 58. 10.3390/separations5040058

  • 6

    Abnous K. Abdolabadi A. K. Ramezani M. Alibolandi M. Nameghi M. A. Zavvar T. et al (2022). A highly sensitive electrochemical aptasensor for cocaine detection based on CRISPR-Cas12a and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as signal amplifiers. Talanta241, 123276. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123276

  • 7

    Abramson A. (2021). Substance use during the pandemic. Am. Psychol. Assoc.52 (2), 22. Available online at:https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/03/substance-use-pandemic.

  • 8

    Abuzalat O. Wong D. Park S. S. Kim S. (2020). Highly selective and sensitive fluorescent zeolitic imidazole frameworks sensor for nitroaromatic explosive detection. Nanoscale.12 (25), 1352313530. 10.1039/d0nr01653e

  • 9

    Açikgöz G. Hamamci B. (2020). Determination of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in blood samples using partial least squares discriminant analysis applied to surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc.106, 103012. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2019.103012

  • 10

    Adedara I. A. Mohammed K. A. Da-Silva O. F. Salaudeen F. A. Gonçalves F. L. S. Rosemberg D. B. et al (2022). Utility of cockroach as a model organism in the assessment of toxicological impacts of environmental pollutants. Environ. Adv.8, 100195. 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100195

  • 11

    Adegoke O. Nic Daeid N. (2021). Colorimetric optical nanosensors for trace explosive detection using metal nanoparticles: advances, pitfalls, and future perspective. Emerg. Top. Life Sci.5, 367379. 10.1042/etls20200281

  • 12

    Adegoke O. Nsuamani M. L. Daeid N. N. (2023). Cadmium-free silica-encapsulated molecularly imprinted AuZnCeSeS quantum dots nanocomposite as an ultrasensitive fluorescence nanosensor for methamphetamine detection. Mater Sci. Semicond. Process159, 107387. 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107387

  • 13

    Adegoke O. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. (2020). Biomimetic graphene oxide-cationic multi-shaped gold nanoparticle-hemin hybrid nanozyme: tuning enhanced catalytic activity for the rapid colorimetric apta-biosensing of amphetamine-type stimulants. Talanta216, 120990. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120990

  • 14

    Adegoke O. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. (2022). Fabrication of a near-infrared fluorescence-emitting SiO2-AuZnFeSeS quantum dots-molecularly imprinted polymer nanocomposite for the ultrasensitive fluorescence detection of levamisole. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS646, 129013. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129013

  • 15

    Adhikary R. R. Banerjee R. (2021). Development of smart core-shell nanoparticle-based sensors for the point-of-care detection of alpha amylase in diagnostics and forensics. Biosens. Bioelectron.184, 113244. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113244

  • 16

    Ahamed S. Mahato M. Tohora N. Sultana T. Sahoo R. Ghanta S. et al (2023). A PET and ESIPT-communicated ratiometric, turn-on chromo-fluorogenic sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of sarin gas mimic, diethylchlorophosphate. Talanta.258, 124448. 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124448

  • 17

    Ahmed I. Elsherif M. Park S. Yetisen A. K. Butt H. (2022). Nanostructured photonic hydrogels for real-time alcohol detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater5 (6), 77447753. 10.1021/acsanm.2c00576

  • 18

    Ahmed S. R. Chand R. Kumar S. Mittal N. Srinivasan S. Rajabzadeh A. R. (2020). Recent biosensing advances in the rapid detection of illicit drugs. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.131, 116006. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116006

  • 19

    Akçan R. Yildirim M. S. Ilhan H. Güven B. Tamer U. Saglam N. (2020). Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a novel tool for rapid quantification of heroin and metabolites in saliva. Turk J. Med. Sci.50 (5), 14701479. 10.3906/sag-1912-196

  • 20

    Akgönüllü S. Battal D. Yalcin M. S. Yavuz H. Denizli A. (2020). Rapid and sensitive detection of synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018, JWH-073 and their metabolites using molecularly imprinted polymer-coated QCM nanosensor in artificial saliva. Microchem. J.153, 104454. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104454

  • 21

    Alberti G. Zanoni C. Spina S. Magnaghi L. R. Biesuz R. (2023). Trends in molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)-Based plasmonic sensors. CHEMOSENSORS11 (2), 144. 10.3390/chemosensors11020144

  • 22

    Alder R. Hong J. M. Chow E. Fang J. H. Isa F. Ashford B. et al (2021). Application of plasma-printed paper-based SERS substrate for cocaine detection. SENSORS21 (3), 810. 10.3390/s21030810

  • 23

    Aleknavicene I. Pabreza E. Talaikis M. Jankunec M. Raciukaitis G. (2022). Low-cost SERS substrate featuring laser-ablated amorphous nanostructure. Appl. Surf. Sci.571, 151248. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151248

  • 24

    Alhaddad M. Sheta S. M. (2020). Dual naked-eye and optical chemosensor for morphine detection in biological real samples based on Cr(III) metal–organic framework nanoparticles. ACS Omega5 (43), 2829628304. 10.1021/acsomega.0c04249

  • 25

    Al-Hetlani E. D’Cruz B. Amin M. O. (2020). A 3D miniaturized solid-state chemiluminescence sensor based on ruthenium functionalized polymeric monolith for the detection of pharmaceutical drugs. J. Mater Sci.55 (27), 1323213243. 10.1007/s10853-020-04974-z

  • 26

    Almabadi M. H. Truta F. M. Adamu G. Cowen T. Tertis M. Alanazi K. D. M. et al (2023). Integration of smart nanomaterials for highly selective disposable sensors and their forensic applications in amphetamine determination. Electrochim Acta446, 142009. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142009

  • 27

    Alomar T. S. AlMasoud N. Xu Y. Lima C. Akbali B. Maher S. et al (2022). Simultaneous multiplexed quantification of banned Sudan dyes using surface enhanced Raman scattering and chemometrics. SENSORS22 (20), 7832. 10.3390/s22207832

  • 28

    Alonzo M. Alder R. Clancy L. Fu S. L. (2022). Portable testing techniques for the analysis of drug materials. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.4 (6). 10.1002/wfs2.1461

  • 29

    Alves T. M. R. Deroco P. B. Wachholz D. J. Vidotto L. H. B. Kubota L. T. (2021). Wireless wearable electrochemical sensors: a review. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.8 (31), 2250. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.rv-62-2020

  • 30

    Amalraj A. Narayanan M. Perumal P. (2022). Highly efficient peroxidase-like activity of a metal-oxide-incorporated CeO2-MIL(Fe) metal-organic framework and its application in the colorimetric detection of melamine and mercury ions via induced hydrogen and covalent bonds. ANALYST.147 (14), 32343247. 10.1039/d2an00864e

  • 31

    Ameen A. Brown K. Dennany L. (2022). Can synthetic cannabinoids be reliably screened with electrochemistry? An assessment of the ability to screen for synthetic cannabinoids STS-135 and BB-22 within a single sample matrix. J. Electroanal. Chem.909, 116141. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116141

  • 32

    Ameen A. Russell H. Dennany L. L. (2020). Voltammetry as a rapid screening method for NPS identification. Proc. SPIE11540, 121126. 10.1117/12.2573507

  • 33

    Ameku W. A. Gonçalves J. M. Ataide V. N. Santos M. S. F. Gutz I. G. R. Araki K. et al (2021). Combined colorimetric and electrochemical measurement paper-based device for chemometric proof-of-concept analysis of cocaine samples. ACS Omega6 (1), 594605. 10.1021/acsomega.0c05077

  • 34

    Amini K. Sepehrifard A. Valinasabpouri A. Safruk J. Angelone D. Lourenco T. D. (2022). Recent advances in electrochemical sensor technologies for THC detection-a narrative review. J. Cannabis Res.4 (1), 12. 10.1186/s42238-022-00122-3

  • 35

    Amiri M. Imanzadeh H. Sefid-Sefidehkhan Y. (2021). An overview on electrochemical sensors based on nanomaterials for the determination of drugs of abuse. Curr. Drug Deliv.18 (2), 162183. 10.2174/1567201817666200520084835

  • 36

    Amr A. E. E. Kamel A. H. Almehizia A. A. Sayed A. Y. A. Abd-Rabboh H. S. M. (2021). Solid-contact potentiometric sensors based on main-tailored bio-mimics for trace detection of harmine hallucinogen in urine specimens. MOLECULES26 (2), 324. 10.3390/molecules26020324

  • 37

    Anfossi L. Di Nardo F. Russo A. Cavalera S. Giovannoli C. Spano G. et al (2018). Silver and gold nanoparticles as multi-chromatic lateral flow assay probes for the detection of food allergens. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.411 (9), 19051913. 10.1007/s00216-018-1451-6

  • 38

    Anjali K. G. Jibin K. V. Aswathy P. V. Shanty A. A. Shijo F. Dhanya T. M. et al (2022). An imidazole ligated zinc(II) transition metal complex as a “turn-off” fluorescent sensor for the selective and sensitive detection of brilliant blue FCF. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY433, 114134. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114134

  • 39

    Ansari A. A. A. Aldajani K. M. M. AlHazaa A. N. N. Albrithen H. A. A. (2022). Recent progress of fluorescent materials for fingermarks detection in forensic science and anti-counterfeiting. Coord. Chem. Rev.462, 214523. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214523

  • 40

    Anvari L. Ghoreishi S. M. Faridbod F. Ganjali M. R. (2021). Electrochemical determination of methamphetamine in human plasma on a nanoceria nanoparticle decorated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Anal. Lett.54 (15), 25092522. 10.1080/00032719.2021.1875229

  • 41

    Anvari L. Ghoreishi S. M. Khoshnevisan K. Ganjali M. R. Faridbod F. (2023). Methamphetamine determination using label-free impedimetric aptasensor based on ceria nanocomposite. J. Appl. Electrochem53 (9), 18431851. 10.1007/s10800-023-01880-5

  • 42

    Anzar N. Suleman S. Parvez S. Narang J. (2022). A review on Illicit drugs and biosensing advances for its rapid detection. PROCESS Biochem.113, 113124. 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.12.021

  • 43

    Apak R. Üzer A. Saglam S. Arman A. (2023). Selective electrochemical detection of explosives with nanomaterial based electrodes. Electroanalysis35 (1). 10.1002/elan.202200175

  • 44

    Arman A. Saglam S. Üzer A. Apak R. (2022). Electrochemical determination of nitroaromatic explosives using glassy carbon/multi walled carbon nanotube/polyethyleneimine electrode coated with gold nanoparticles. Talanta238, 122990. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122990

  • 45

    Assis A. M. L. Costa C. V. Alves M. S. Melo J. C. S. de Oliveira V. R. Tonholo J. et al (2023). From nanomaterials to macromolecules: innovative technologies for latent fingerprint development. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.5 (2). 10.1002/wfs2.1475

  • 46

    Ataide V. N. Mendes L. F. Gama LILM de A. W. R. Paixão TRLC (2020). Electrochemical paper-based analytical devices: ten years of development. Anal. Methods12 (8), 10301054. 10.1039/c9ay02350j

  • 47

    Atik G. Kilic N. M. Horzum N. Odaci D. Timur S. (2023). Antibody-Conjugated electrospun nanofibers for electrochemical detection of methamphetamine. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces15 (20), 2410924119. 10.1021/acsami.3c02266

  • 48

    Atta S. Tuan V. D. (2023). Ultra-trace SERS detection of cocaine and heroin using bimetallic gold-silver nanostars (BGNS-Ag). Anal. Chim. Acta.1251, 340956. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340956

  • 49

    Atta S. Vo-Dinh T. (2023). A hybrid plasmonic nanoprobe using polyvinylpyrrolidone-capped bimetallic silver-gold nanostars for highly sensitive and reproducible solution-based SERS sensing. ANALYST.148 (8), 17861796. 10.1039/d2an01876d

  • 50

    Author Anonymous (2025a). Drug categories and their common effects – the wise drive. Available online at:https://www.thewisedrive.com/drug-categories-and-their-common-effects/.

  • 51

    Author Anonymous (2025b). NSDUH national releases. Available online at:https://www.samhsa.gov/data/nsduh/national-releases.

  • 52

    Aydindogan E. Balaban S. Evran S. Coskunol H. Timur S. (2019). A bottom-up approach for developing aptasensors for abused drugs: biosensors in forensics. Biosens. (Basel).9 (4), 118. 10.3390/bios9040118

  • 53

    Azimi S. Docoslis A. (2022). Recent advances in the use of surface-enhanced Raman scattering for illicit drug detection. SENSORS22 (10), 3877. 10.3390/s22103877

  • 54

    Azman A. Mahat N. Wahab R. Ahmad W. Puspanadan J. Huri M. et al (2021). Box-Behnken design optimisation of a green novel nanobio-based reagent for rapid visualisation of latent fingerprints on wet, non-porous substrates. Biotechnol. Lett.43 (4), 881898. 10.1007/s10529-020-03052-3

  • 55

    Badawy S. M. (2020). Semi-quantitative analysis of drugs of abuse in human urine by end-point dilution flow immunochromatographic assay. JPC – J. Planar Chromatogr. – Mod. TLC33 (4), 419425. 10.1007/s00764-020-00041-0

  • 56

    Badshah M. A. Koh N. Y. Zia A. W. Abbas N. Zahra Z. Saleem M. W. (2020). Recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures for metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensing. Nanomaterials10 (9), 1749. 10.3390/nano10091749

  • 57

    Baghban H. N. Hasanzadeh M. Liu Y. Q. Seidi F. (2022). A portable colorimetric chemosensing regime for ractopamine in chicken samples using μPCD decorated by silver nanoprisms. RSC Adv.12 (39), 2567525686. 10.1039/d2ra04793d

  • 58

    Bai L. (2022). RETRACTED: electrochemical behavior of salbutamol, clenbuterol, ractopamine and albuterol at CNTs/GCE. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (5), 220567. 10.20964/2022.05.67

  • 59

    Balaban S. Man E. Durmus C. Bor G. Ceylan A. E. Gumus Z. P. et al (2020). Sensor platform with a custom-tailored aptamer for diagnosis of synthetic cannabinoids. Electroanalysis32 (3), 656665. 10.1002/elan.201900670

  • 60

    Balaji R. Renganathan V. Chen S. M. Singh V. (2020). Ingenious design and development of recyclable 2D BiOCl nanotiles attached tri-functional robust strips for high performance selective electrochemical sensing, SERS and heterogenous dip catalysis. Chem. Eng. J.385, 123974. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123974

  • 61

    Bandey H. L. Gibson A. P. (2006). Investigation, enforcement and protection sector fingerprint development and imaging newsletter: special edition the powders process, study 2: evaluation of fingerprint powders on smooth surfaces authors. Available online at:www.hosdb.homeoffice.gov.uk.

  • 62

    Baracu A. M. Gugoasa L. A. D. (2021). Review—recent advances in microfabrication, design and applications of amperometric sensors and biosensors. J. Electrochem Soc.168 (3), 037503. 10.1149/1945-7111/abe8b6

  • 63

    Barveen N. R. Wang T. J. Chang Y. H. (2021). Photochemical decoration of silver nanoparticles on silver vanadate nanorods as an efficient SERS probe for ultrasensitive detection of chloramphenicol residue in real samples. Chemosphere275, 130115. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130115

  • 64

    Basterrechea D. A. Rocher J. Parra L. Lloret J. (2021). Low-cost system based on optical sensor to monitor discharge of industrial oil in irrigation ditches. SENSORS21 (16), 5449. 10.3390/s21165449

  • 65

    Batool M. Afzal Z. Junaid H. M. Solangi A. R. Hassan A. (2022b). Sulfonamides as optical chemosensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 954981. 10.1080/10408347.2022.2105135

  • 66

    Batool R. Riaz N. Junaid H. M. Waseem M. T. Khan Z. A. Nawazish S. et al (2022a). Fluorene-based fluorometric and colorimetric conjugated polymers for sensitive detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol explosive in aqueous medium. ACS Omega7 (1), 10571070. 10.1021/acsomega.1c05644

  • 67

    Bazin I. Tria S. A. Hayat A. Marty J. L. (2017). New biorecognition molecules in biosensors for the detection of toxins. Biosens. Bioelectron.87, 285298. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.083

  • 68

    Bazzi F. Ebrahimi-Hoseinzadeh B. Sangachin E. A. Hosseini M. (2023). The integration of hybridization chain reaction (HCR) with fluorogenic silver nanoclusters (AgNCs) in an aggregation induced emission (AIE)-based nanosensor for sex determination and its forensic application. Microchem. J.185, 108188. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108188

  • 69

    Behyar M. B. Shadjou N. (2021). d-Penicillamine functionalized dendritic fibrous nanosilica (DFNS-DPA): synthesise and its application as an innovative advanced nanomaterial towards sensitive quantification of ractopamine. RSC Adv.11 (48), 3020630214. 10.1039/d1ra05655g

  • 70

    Bener M. Sen F. B. Apak R. (2022). Protamine gold nanoclusters - based fluorescence turn-on sensor for rapid determination of Trinitrotoluene (TNT). SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc., 279. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121462

  • 71

    Bever C. S. Adams C. A. Hnasko R. M. Cheng L. W. Stanker L. H. (2020). Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for the detection of lethal amatoxins from mushrooms. PLoS One15 (4), e0231781. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231781

  • 72

    Bhagat D. S. Suryawanshi I. V. Gurnule W. B. Sawant S. S. Chavan P. B. (2019). Greener synthesis of CuO nanoparticles for enhanced development of latent fingerprints. Mater Today Proc.36, 747750. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.357

  • 73

    Bhalla N. Jolly P. Formisano N. Estrela P. (2016). Introduction to biosensors. Essays Biochem.60 (1), 18. 10.1042/ebc20150001

  • 74

    Bhati K. Tripathy D. B. Kumaravel V. Sudhani H. P. K. Ali S. Choudhary R. et al (2023). Sensitive fingerprint detection using biocompatible mesoporous silica nanoparticle coating on non-porous surfaces. COATINGS13 (2), 268. 10.3390/coatings13020268

  • 75

    Bilge S. Dogan-Topal B. Gürbüz M. M. Yücel A. Sinag A. Ozkan S. A. (2022). Recent advances in electrochemical sensing of cocaine: a review. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.157, 116768. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116768

  • 76

    Blythe J. M. Johnson S. D. (2019). A systematic review of crime facilitated by the consumer Internet of Things. Secur. J.34, 97125. 10.1057/s41284-019-00211-8

  • 77

    Bollella P. Katz E. (2020). Biosensors special issue: the potential of (bio)sensors for the forensic. Sciences9 (4). Available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biosensors/special_issues/F_sci.

  • 78

    Borgul P. Pawlak P. Rudnicki K. Sipa K. Krzyczmonik P. Trynda A. et al (2021). Ephedrine sensing at the electrified liquid-liquid interface supported with micro-punched self-adhesive polyimide film. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL344, 130286. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130286

  • 79

    Borgul P. Sobczak K. Rudnicki K. Glazer P. Pawlak P. Trynda A. et al (2022b). Electrochemical behavior of cocaine cutting agents at the polarized liquid-liquid interface. Electrochim Acta402, 139553. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139553

  • 80

    Borgul P. Sobczak K. Rudnicki K. Leniart A. Skrzypek S. L. Poltorak L. (2022a). Oxidized thin aluminum films used as the polarized liquid-liquid interface support for norcocaine detection. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL373, 132651. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132651

  • 81

    Borgul P. Sobczak K. Sipa K. Rudnicki K. Skrzypek S. Trynda A. et al (2022c). Heroin detection in a droplet hosted in a 3D printed support at the miniaturized electrified liquid-liquid interface. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 18615. 10.1038/s41598-022-21689-0

  • 82

    Boroujerdi R. Abdelkader A. Paul R. (2020). State of the art in alcohol sensing with 2D materials. Nanomicro Lett.12 (1), 33. 10.1007/s40820-019-0363-0

  • 83

    Boroujerdi R. Abdelkader A. Paul R. (2022a). Highly sensitive and selective detection of the antidepressant amitriptyline using a functionalised graphene-based sensor. CHEMNANOMAT8 (10). 10.1002/cnma.202200209

  • 84

    Boroujerdi R. Paul R. (2022a). Introducing graphene-indium oxide electrochemical sensor for detecting ethanol in aqueous samples with CCD-RSM optimization. CHEMOSENSORS10 (2), 42. 10.3390/chemosensors10020042

  • 85

    Boroujerdi R. Paul R. (2022b). Graphene-based electrochemical sensors for psychoactive drugs. NANOMATERIALS12 (13), 2250. 10.3390/nano12132250

  • 86

    Boroujerdi R. Paul R. Abdelkader A. (2022b). Rapid detection of amitriptyline in dried blood and dried saliva samples with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sensors22 (21), 8257. 10.3390/s22218257

  • 87

    Bouaziz L. Boulahlib S. Ozacar M. Si-Ahmed K. Bessekhouad Y. (2022). Effect of Iodine-doping toward ZnO critical optical constants and their applications to latent fingerprints detection. Mater Today Commun.31, 103450. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103450

  • 88

    Bräuer B. Unger C. Werner M. Lieberzeit P. A. (2021). Biomimetic sensors to detect bioanalytes in real-life samples using molecularly imprinted polymers: a review. SENSORS21 (16), 5550. 10.3390/s21165550

  • 89

    Brenes J. P. Arroyo-Mora L. E. Barquero-Quirós M. (2022). Enzymatic inhibitive determination of AB-Fubinaca and AB-Pinaca on screen printed carbon tetratiofulvalene electrodes modified with nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Sens. Biosensing Res.38, 100515. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100515

  • 90

    Brown K. Allan P. Francis P. S. Dennany L. (2020). Psychoactive substances and how to find them: electrochemiluminescence as a strategy for identification and differentiation of drug species. J. Electrochem Soc.167 (16), 166502. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc9db

  • 91

    Brown K. Dennany L. (2022). Electrochemiluminescence sensors and forensic investigations: a viable technique for drug detection?PURE Appl. Chem.94 (5), 535545. 10.1515/pac-2021-1204

  • 92

    Bruijns B. Tiggelaar R. Gardeniers H. (2020). A microfluidic approach for biosensing DNA within forensics. Appl. Sci.10 (20), 7067. 10.3390/app10207067

  • 93

    Bruner E. Monjardez G. (2023). Development of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy evidence swabs using a silver nanoparticle biosynthesis for the detection of animal blood. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.54 (3), 238244. 10.1002/jrs.6479

  • 94

    Bumbrah G. S. Jani M. Bhagat D. S. Dalal K. Kaushal A. Sadhana K. et al (2022). Zinc oxide nanoparticles for detection of latent fingermarks on nonporous surfaces. Mater Chem. Phys.278, 125660. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125660

  • 95

    Burr D. S. Fatigante W. L. Lartey J. A. Jang W. G. Stelmack A. R. McClurg N. W. et al (2020). Integrating SERS and PSI-ms with dual purpose plasmonic paper substrates for on-site illicit drug confirmation. Anal. Chem.92 (9), 66766683. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00562

  • 96

    Byzova N. A. Serchenya T. S. Vashkevich I. I. Zherdev A. V. Sviridov O. V. Dzantiev B. B. (2020). Lateral flow immunoassay for rapid qualitative and quantitative control of the veterinary drug bacitracin in milk. Microchem. J.156, 104884. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104884

  • 97

    Cai Q. R. Mateti S. Jiang H. B. Li L. H. Huang S. M. Chen Y. (2022a). Boron nitride nanosheets for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Mater. TODAY Phys.22, 100575. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100575

  • 98

    Cai Y. Hou T. T. Wang C. Y. Tang Y. H. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang D. T. et al (2022b). Fluorescence enhancement of dicyanomethylene-4H-pyran derivatives in solid state for visualization of latent fingerprints. Front. Chem.10, 943925. 10.3389/fchem.2022.943925

  • 99

    Calabretta M. M. Montali L. Lopreside A. Fragapane F. Iacoangeli F. Roda A. et al (2021). Ultrasensitive on-field luminescence detection using a low-cost silicon photomultiplier device. Anal. Chem.93 (20), 73887393. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00899

  • 100

    Canoura J. Liu Y. Z. Perry J. Willis C. Xiao Y. (2023). Suite of aptamer-based sensors for the detection of fentanyl and its analogues. ACS Sens.8 (5), 19011911. 10.1021/acssensors.2c02463

  • 101

    Cao H. Y. Cai Z. Z. Li Y. S. Wang G. F. Dou X. C. (2022). Colorimetric-fluorescent dual-mode sensing of peroxide explosives based on inner filter effect with boosted sensitivity and selectivity. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.50 (1), 412. 10.1016/j.cjac.2021.10.002

  • 102

    Cardoso R. M. Rocha D. P. Rocha R. G. Stefano J. S. Silva R. A. B. Richter E. M. et al (2020). 3D-printing pen versus desktop 3D-printers: fabrication of carbon black/polylactic acid electrodes for single-drop detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Anal. Chim. Acta1132, 1019. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.034

  • 103

    Carvalho R. M. Pedao E. R. Guerbas F. M. R. Tronchini M. P. Ferreira V. S. Petroni J. M. et al (2023). Electrochemical study and forensic electroanalysis of fungicide benzovindiflupyr using disposable graphite pencil electrode. Talanta252, 123873. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123873

  • 104

    Castro A. S. Rodrigues C. H. P. de Menezes M. M. T. da Silva A. B. D. Bruni A. T. de Oliveira M. F. (2021). Fe(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Co(II) salen Schiff base complexes: proposal for a voltammetric sensor to analyze cocaine hydrochloride and its interferents. FORENSIC Chem.25, 100347. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100347

  • 105

    Castro S. V. F. Lima A. P. Rocha R. G. Cardoso R. M. Montes R. H. O. Santana M. H. P. et al (2020). Simultaneous determination of lead and antimony in gunshot residue using a 3D-printed platform working as sampler and sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta1130, 126136. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.033

  • 106

    Castro S. V. F. Rocha R. G. Joao A. F. Richter E. M. Munoz R. A. A. (2022). Promising applications of additive-manufactured (3D-printed) electrochemical sensors for forensic chemistry. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.9 (34), 79105. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.RV-50-2021

  • 107

    Catalan-Carrio R. Moreno-Sanz G. Basabe-Desmonts L. Benito-Lopez F. (2021). “Ionogel based material for the colorimetric detection of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol,” in Italian national conference on sensors.

  • 108

    Cellmark (2025a). Fire investigation//cellmark. Available online at: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/services/forensic-casework/fire-investigation/.

  • 109

    Cellmark (2025b). Gun shot residue GSR analysis//cellmark. Available online at: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/services/forensic-casework/gunshot-residue/.

  • 110

    CENSUS (2023). Crime in england and wales. Newport, United Kingdom: Office for National Statistics. Available online at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingdecember2023.

  • 111

    Ceto X. Bonet-San-Emeterio M. Ortiz-Aguayo D. Rodriguez-Franch E. Del Valle M. (2022). Experiences in the detection of drugs of abuse in smuggling seizures and forensic samples using electronic tongue principles. Int. Symposium Olfaction Electron. Nose, ISOEN 2022 - Proc., 14. 10.1109/isoen54820.2022.9789611

  • 112

    Cevallos-Cedeño R. E. Agulló C. Abad-Fuentes A. Abad-Somovilla A. Mercader J. V. (2021). Enzyme and lateral flow monoclonal antibody-based immunoassays to simultaneously determine spirotetramat and spirotetramat-enol in foodstuffs. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 113. 10.1038/s41598-021-81432-z

  • 113

    Chadha U. Bhardwaj P. Agarwal R. Rawat P. Agarwal R. Gupta I. et al (2022). Recent progress and growth in biosensors technology: a critical review. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.109, 2151. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.02.010

  • 114

    Chaiendoo K. Ngamdee K. Limbut W. Saiyasombat C. Busayaporn W. Ittisanronnachai S. et al (2021). Gold nanoparticle-based cascade reaction-triggered fluorogenicity for highly selective nitrite ion detection in forensic samples. Microchem. J.168, 106470. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106470

  • 115

    Chakraborty M. Prusti B. Chakravarty M. (2022). Small electron-rich isomeric solid-state emitters with variation in coplanarity and molecular packings: rapid and ultralow recognition of TNT. ACS Appl. Electron Mat.4 (5), 24812489. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c00241

  • 116

    Chang R. Wang T. Liu Q. Tang J. Wu D. L. (2022b). Ag Nanoparticles@Agar gel as a 3D flexible and stable SERS substrate with ultrahigh sensitivity. LANGMUIR.38 (45), 1382213832. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01966

  • 117

    Chang Y. L. Su C. J. Lu L. C. Wan D. H. (2022a). Aluminum plasmonic nanoclusters for paper-based surface- enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem.94 (47), 1631916327. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03014

  • 118

    Chedid A. A. Azevedo L. S. Galaço A. Casagrande T. R. Serra O. A. de Oliveira M. F. (2023). Voltammetric analysis of luminescent markers in gunshot residues. J. Forensic Sci.68 (3), 780789. 10.1111/1556-4029.15236

  • 119

    Che Marzuki N. H. Mahat N. A. Huyop F. Aboul-Enein H. Y. Wahab R. A. (2015). Sustainable production of the emulsifier methyl oleate by Candida rugosa lipase nanoconjugates. Food Bioprod. Process.96, 211220. 10.1016/j.fbp.2015.08.005

  • 120

    Chen C. H. Wang C. C. Ko P. Y. Chen L. Y. (2020c). Nanomaterial-based adsorbents and optical sensors for illicit drug analysis. J. Food Drug Anal.28, 655677. 10.38212/2224-6614.1137

  • 121

    Chen H. Wu F. S. Xu Y. B. Liu Y. Song L. Chen X. J. et al (2021a). Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of selective molecularly imprinted polymers for the fast determination of synthetic cathinones. RSC Adv.11 (47), 2975229761. 10.1039/d1ra01330k

  • 122

    Chen M. Burn P. L. Shaw P. E. (2023d). Luminescence-based detection and identification of illicit drugs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25 (19), 1324413259. 10.1039/d3cp00524k

  • 123

    Chen M. Huang Y. Q. Miao J. J. Fan Y. X. Lai K. Q. (2023c). A highly sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor with MIL-100 (Fe)/Au composites for detection of malachite green in fish pond water. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.292, 122432. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122432

  • 124

    Chen Q. Liu J. X. Liu S. J. Zhang J. He L. F. Liu R. Y. et al (2023a). Visual and rapid detection of nerve agent mimics in gas and solution phase by a simple fluorescent probe. Anal. Chem.95, 43904394. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04891

  • 125

    Chen Q. Qie M. Peng X. Chen Y. Wang Y. (2020a). Immunochromatographic assay for melamine based on luminescent quantum dot beads as signaling probes. RSC Adv.10 (6), 33073313. 10.1039/c9ra08350b

  • 126

    Chen S. J. Zhu Y. T. Han J. Zhang T. Y. Chou R. W. Liu A. P. et al (2023b). Construction of a molecularly imprinted sensor modified with tea branch biochar and its rapid detection of norfloxacin residues in animal-derived foods. FOODS12 (3), 544. 10.3390/foods12030544

  • 127

    Chen T. H. Jiang L. R. Hou J. T. Wang W. Zeng L. T. Bao G. M. (2020b). A portable chromogenic and fluorogenic membrane sensor for ultrasensitive, specific and instantaneous visualizing of lethal phosgene. J. Mater Chem. A Mater8 (46), 2469524702. 10.1039/d0ta08333j

  • 128

    Chen X. Z. Jia L. Zhang L. A. Li Y. X. Xu J. (2022). Stimulus response of HNT-CDs-Eu nano-sensor: toward visual point-of-care monitoring of a bacterial spore biomarker with hypersensitive multi-color agarose gel based analytical device. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS639, 128356. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128356

  • 129

    Chen Y. C. Hong S. W. Wu H. H. S. Wang Y. L. Chen Y. F. (2021b). Rapid Formation of nanoclusters for detection of drugs in urine using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. NANOMATERIALS11 (7), 1789. 10.3390/nano11071789

  • 130

    Cheng J. Fan M. D. Wang P. L. Su X. O. (2020). The twice-oxidized graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles composite SERS substrate for sensitive detection of clenbuterol residues in animal-origin food samples. Food Anal. Methods13 (4), 902910. 10.1007/s12161-020-01709-3

  • 131

    Cheng W. W. Tang X. Z. Zhang Y. Wu D. Yang W. J. (2021). Applications of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based sensors for food safety: enhancing mechanisms and recent advances. Trends Food Sci. Technol.112, 268282. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.004

  • 132

    Chengyi H. Sishi Y. Chenying D. Chenyue W. Chen L. Huang Z. (2020). Sensitive and on-site detection of glyphosate based on papain-stabilized fluorescent gold nanoclusters. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (29), 81778184. 10.1007/s00216-020-02952-7

  • 133

    Chiang C. Lee H. Chen B. Lin Y. C. Chao Y. Huang Y. (2019). Using ambient mass spectrometry and LC-MS/MS for the rapid detection and identification of multiple illicit street drugs. J. Food Drug Anal.27 (2), 439450. 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.11.003

  • 134

    Chio W. I. K. Liu J. Jones T. Perumal J. Dinish U. S. Parkin I. P. et al (2021). SERS multiplexing of methylxanthine drug isomers via host-guest size matching and machine learning. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (37), 1262412632. 10.1039/d1tc02004h

  • 135

    Chisum W. J. Turvey B. E. (2011). Crime reconstruction. 2nd ed.Academic Press.

  • 136

    Cho S. Kim Y. (2022). Donor-acceptor Stenhouse adduct formation for the simple and rapid colorimetric detection of amphetamine-type stimulants. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL355, 131274. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131274

  • 137

    Choinska M. K. Sestakova I. Hrdlicka V. Skopalova J. Langmaier J. Maier V. et al (2022). Electroanalysis of fentanyl and its new analogs: a review. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (1), 26. 10.3390/bios12010026

  • 138

    Chu H. W. Unnikrishnan B. Anand A. Lin Y. W. Huang C. C. (2020). Carbon quantum dots for the detection of antibiotics and pesticides. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 540558. 10.38212/2224-6614.1269

  • 139

    Clarke V. Braun V. (2017). Thematic analysis. J. Posit. Psychol.12 (3), 297298. 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

  • 140

    Cockbain E. Bowers K. Dimitrova G. (2018). Human trafficking for labour exploitation: the results of a two-phase systematic review mapping the European evidence base and synthesising key scientific research evidence. J. Exp. Criminol.14 (3), 319360. 10.1007/s11292-017-9321-3

  • 141

    Coleparmer (2025). Ultraviolet equipment from cole-parmer United Kingdom. Available online at: https://www.coleparmer.co.uk/c/ultraviolet-equipment.

  • 142

    College of Policing (2017). Forensics. Available online at: https://www.college.police.uk/app/investigation/forensics.

  • 143

    Cook S. Honeychurch K. C. (2021). Forensic electrochemical presumptive blood test based on the voltammetric behaviour of methylene blue and whole blood. Anal. METHODS13 (42), 49854993. 10.1039/d1ay01358k

  • 144

    Corporate Report (2022). Forensic Information Databases annual report 2021 to 2022 (accessible version) - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022-accessible-version.

  • 145

    Corporate Report (2023). Forensic Information Databases annual report 2021 to 2022 (accessible version) - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022-accessible-version.

  • 146

    Costa B. M. F. Freitas D. V. Sousa F. L. N. Silva K. D. Dias J. M. M. Assis A. M. L. et al (2020). SATS@CdTe hierarchical structures emitting green to red colors developed for latent fingerprint applications. DYES PIGMENTS180, 108483. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108483

  • 147

    Costanzo H. Gooch J. Frascione N. (2023). Nanomaterials for optical biosensors in forensic analysis. Talanta253, 123945. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123945

  • 148

    Couto R. A. S. Coelho C. Mounssef B. Morais S. F. D. Lima C. D. dos Santos W. T. P. et al (2021). 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) sensing based on electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers on silver nanoparticles and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. NANOMATERIALS11 (2), 353. 10.3390/nano11020353

  • 149

    Couturier C. Wada A. Louis K. Mistretta M. Beitz B. Povogui M. et al (2020). Characterization and analytical validation of a new antigenic rapid diagnostic test for Ebola virus disease detection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.14 (1), e0007965. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007965

  • 150

    Cribbin T. F. (2011). “Citation Chain Aggregation: an interaction model to support citation cycling,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 21492152.

  • 151

    Criminal Damage and Arson Crime and Safety Statistics (2025). CrimeRate. Available online at: https://crimerate.co.uk/criminal-damage-arson.

  • 152

    Cupil-Garcia V. Strobbia P. Ran Y. Crawford B. M. Wang H. neng Zentella R. et al (2020). Fiberoptics SERS sensors using plasmonic nanostar probes for detection of molecular biotargets. spiedigitallibrary.Org.1125. 10.1117/12.2552993

  • 153

    Curtis V. Cairncross S. (2003). Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.3 (5), 275281. 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00606-6

  • 154

    Dagar M. Yadav S. Sai V. V. R. Satija J. Bhatia H. (2022). Emerging trends in point-of-care sensors for illicit drugs analysis. Talanta238, 123048. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123048

  • 155

    Dagnaw F. W. Feng W. Song Q. H. (2020). Selective and rapid detection of nerve agent simulants by polymer fibers with a fluorescent chemosensor in gas phase. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL318, 127937. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127937

  • 156

    Dahiwadkar R. Kumar H. Kanvah S. (2022). Detection of illicit GHB using AIE active fluorene containing α-Cyanostilbenes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY427, 113844. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113844

  • 157

    Dahiya K. Sharma H. Biswas L. Verma A. K. (2022). Nanotechnology in forensic science: extensive applications and new perspective. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys.59 (12), 11441147. 10.56042/ijbb.v59i12.67319

  • 158

    Dai S. J. Li Q. J. Li W. Zhang Y. D. Dou M. H. Xu R. M. et al (2022). Advances in functional photonic crystal materials for the analysis of chemical hazards in food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.21 (6), 49004920. 10.1111/1541-4337.13036

  • 159

    Dai Z. H. (2023). Recent advances in the development of portable electrochemical sensors for controlled substances. SENSORS23 (6), 3140. 10.3390/s23063140

  • 160

    Dang Q. M. Gilmore S. T. Lalwani K. Conk R. J. Simpson J. H. Leopold M. C. (2022). Monolayer-Protected gold nanoparticles functionalized with halogen bonding capability- an avenue for molecular detection schemes. LANGMUIR38 (16), 47474762. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00381

  • 161

    Dare E. O. Vendrell-Criado V. Jiménez M. C. Pérez-Ruiz R. Díaz D. D. (2020). Fluorescent-Labeled octasilsesquioxane nanohybrids as potential materials for latent fingerprinting detection. CHEMISTRY-A Eur. J.26 (58), 1314213146. 10.1002/chem.202001908

  • 162

    Das M. K. Mishra T. Guria S. Das D. Sadhukhan J. Sarker S. et al (2022). Fluorometric detection of a chemical warfare agent mimic (DCP) using a simple hydroxybenzothiazole-diaminomaleonitrile based chemodosimeter. NEW J. Chem.47 (1), 250257. 10.1039/d2nj04260f

  • 163

    Davis-Martin R. E. Alessi S. M. Boudreaux E. D. (2021). Alcohol use disorder in the age of technology: a review of wearable biosensors in alcohol use disorder treatment. Front. Psychiatry12, 642813. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642813

  • 164

    de Faria L. V. Rocha R. G. Arantes L. C. Ramos D. L. O. Lima C. D. Richter E. M. et al (2022). Cyclic square-wave voltammetric discrimination of the amphetamine-type stimulants MDA and MDMA in real-world forensic samples by 3D-printed carbon electrodes. Electrochim Acta429, 141002. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141002

  • 165

    Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (2022). Fingermark visualisation source book v 3.0 the scientific rationale behind the processes within fingermark visualisation manual second edition 2022 fingermark visualisation source book v3.0. Available online at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3.

  • 166

    de Lima L. F. de Araujo W. R. (2022). Laser-scribed graphene on polyetherimide substrate: an electrochemical sensor platform for forensic determination of xylazine in urine and beverage samples. Microchim. ACTA189 (12), 465. 10.1007/s00604-022-05566-1

  • 167

    DeMers H. L. He S. Pandit S. G. Hannah E. E. Zhang Z. Yan F. et al (2020). Development of an antigen detection assay for early point-of-care diagnosis of Zaire ebolavirus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.14 (11), e0008817. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008817

  • 168

    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2025). Emissions of air pollutants in the UK – particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) - GOV. London, United Kingdom: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-particulate-matter-pm10-and-pm25.

  • 169

    De Rycke E. Stove C. Dubruel P. De Saeger S. Beloglazova N. (2020). Recent developments in electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in diverse matrices. Biosens. Bioelectron.169, 112579. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112579

  • 170

    de Souza F. L. A. Amorim C. G. Araújo A. D. Satínsky D. Paim A. P. S. Montenegro M. (2022). Malachite green optical sensor based on electrospun polyimide nanofiber. CHEMOSENSORS10 (9), 348. 10.3390/chemosensors10090348

  • 171

    Dhar B. C. Roche C. E. Levine J. F. (2021). Developing mitochondrial DNA field-compatible tests. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.52, 31373177. 10.1080/10643389.2021.1904709

  • 172

    Dhiman S. Ahmad M. Kumar G. Luxami V. Singh P. Kumar S. (2021). Ratiometric chemosensor for differentiation of TNP from other NACs using distinct blue fluorescence and visualization of latent fingerprints. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (3), 10971106. 10.1039/d0tc04795c

  • 173

    Diamandis E. P. Christopoulos T. K. (1996). Immunoassay. Academic Press.

  • 174

    Dias B. C. Batista A. D. Petruci J. F. D. (2021). μOPTO: a microfluidic paper-based optoelectronic tongue as presumptive tests for the discrimination of alkaloid drugs for forensic purposes. Anal. Chim. Acta1187, 339141. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339141

  • 175

    Dief E. M. Hoffmann N. Darwish N. (2022). Electrochemical detection of dinitrobenzene on silicon electrodes: toward explosives sensors. SURFACES5 (1), 218227. 10.3390/surfaces5010015

  • 176

    Díez-Pascual A. M. Cruz D. L. Redondo A. L. (2022). Advanced carbon-based polymeric nanocomposites for forensic analysis. Polym. (Basel)14 (17), 3598. 10.3390/polym14173598

  • 177

    Ding L. Peng D. Wang R. Li Q. (2021a). A user-secure and highly selective enhancement of latent fingerprints by magnetic composite powder based on carbon dot fluorescence. J. Alloys Compd.856, 158160. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158160

  • 178

    Ding N. N. Liu K. Qi Y. Y. Shang C. D. Chang X. M. Fang Y. (2021b). Methamphetamine detection enabled by a fluorescent carborane derivative of perylene monoimide in film state. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL340, 129964. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129964

  • 179

    Ding Y. R. Zhang N. Zhao J. Q. Lv H. Y. Wang X. Zhao B. et al (2022). Determination of antihypertensive drugs irbesartan and doxazosin mesylate in healthcare products and urine samples using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (27), 78137822. 10.1007/s00216-022-04315-w

  • 180

    Ding Z. X. Wang C. Song X. Li N. Zheng X. Y. Wang C. X. et al (2023). Strong π-metal interaction enables liquid interfacial nanoarray–molecule Co-assembly for Raman sensing of ultratrace fentanyl doped in heroin, ketamine, morphine, and real urine. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces15 (9), 1257012579. 10.1021/acsami.2c22607

  • 181

    Divya V. Agrawal B. Srivastav A. Bhatt P. Bhowmik S. Agrawal Y. K. et al (2020). Fluorescent amphiphilic silica nanopowder for developing latent fingerprints. Aust. J. Forensic Sci.52 (3), 354367. 10.1080/00450618.2018.1533036

  • 182

    Dokuzparmak E. Brown K. Dennany L. (2021). Electrochemiluminescent screening for methamphetamine metabolites. Analyst146 (10), 33363345. 10.1039/d1an00226k

  • 183

    Dragan A. M. Truta F. M. Tertis M. Florea A. Schram J. Cernat A. et al (2021). Electrochemical fingerprints of illicit drugs on graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Front. Chem.9, 641147. 10.3389/fchem.2021.641147

  • 184

    Dreier L. B. Kölbl C. Jeuk V. Beleites C. Köhntopp A. Duschek F. (2022). Setup and analysis of a mid-infrared stand-off system to detect traces of explosives on fabrics. Sensors22 (20), 7839. 10.3390/s22207839

  • 185

    Drug Testing Clinics (2025). “Drug and drink driving UK - a rising problem,”. United Kingdom: Drug Testing Clinics. Available online at: https://www.drugtestingclinics.co.uk/drug-and-drink-driving-a-problem-on-the-rise/.

  • 186

    DrugWipe (2025). DrugWipe is the premier drug test in the UK. Available online at: https://www.dtecinternational.com/drug-testing.

  • 187

    Duan L. X. Zheng Q. S. Tu T. (2022a). Instantaneous high-resolution visual imaging of latent fingerprints in water using color-tunable AIE pincer complexes. Adv. Mater.34 (35), e2202540. 10.1002/adma.202202540

  • 188

    Duan N. Chen X. W. Lin X. F. Ying D. C. Wang Z. P. Yuan W. B. et al (2023). Paper-based fluorometric sensing of malachite green using synergistic recognition of aptamer-molecularly imprinted polymers and luminescent metal-organic frameworks. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL384, 133665. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133665

  • 189

    Duan N. Qi S. Guo Y. Xu W. Wu S. Wang Z. (2020). Fe3O4@Au@Ag nanoparticles as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates for sensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride in pork with the use of aptamer binding. LWT, 134. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110017

  • 190

    Duan N. Ren K. X. Lyu C. Wang Z. P. Wu S. J. (2022b). Discovery and optimization of an aptamer and its sensing ability to amantadine based on SERS via binary metal nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food Chem.70 (46), 1480514815. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06681

  • 191

    Dube S. Satish S. Rawtani D. (2023). Aptasensors in environmental forensics: tracking the silent killers. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.5 (4). 10.1002/wfs2.1482

  • 192

    Dutta B. Hazra A. Dey A. Sinha C. Ray P. P. Banerjee P. et al (2020). Construction of a succinate-bridged Cd(II)-Based two-dimensional coordination polymer for efficient optoelectronic device fabrication and explosive sensing application. Cryst. Growth Des.20 (2), 765776. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01181

  • 193

    Düzmen S. Aslanoglu M. (2022). Tungsten doped neodymium oxide-carbon nanotubes based voltammetric platform as a highly efficient electrocatalyst and sensing material for monitoring albuterol. J. Electroanal. Chem.922, 116717. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116717

  • 194

    Dwivedi A. Anuradha S. M. Srivastava A. Kumar R. Srivastava S. K. (2023). Enhance photoluminescence properties of Ca-Eu:Y2O3@SiO2 core–shell nanomaterial for the advanced forensic and LEDs applications. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.299, 122782. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122782

  • 195

    El-Akaad S. De Saeger S. Beloglazova N. (2021). Molecularly imprinted polymer based capacitive sensing of a specific Leuckart marker 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine in wastewater. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL343, 130116. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130116

  • 196

    Elbalkiny H. T. Samir A. (2022). Green potentiometric electrode for determination of salbutamol in biological samples. Anal. Biochem.659, 114949. 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114949

  • 197

    Elbasuney S. Baraka A. El-Sharkawy Y. H. (2020a). Novel laser induced fluorescence with hyperspectral imaging of amplifying fluorescent melamine resin for TNT vapor detection. Opt. Laser Technol.132, 106488. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106488

  • 198

    Elbasuney S. El-Sharkawy Y. H. El-Sayyad G. S. Gobara M. (2020b). Surface modified colloidal silica nanoparticles: novel aspect for complete identification of explosive materials. Talanta211, 120695. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120695

  • 199

    Elgabry M. Nesbeth D. Johnson S. D. (2020). A systematic review of the criminogenic potential of synthetic biology and routes to future crime prevention. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.8, 571672. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.571672

  • 200

    Elmizadeh H. Bardajee G. R. Moaddeli A. (2023). Ultrasensitive and rapid detection of methamphetamine in forensic biological fluids using fluorescent apta-nanobiosensors based on CdTe quantum dots. Microchem. J.189, 108519. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108519

  • 201

    ENFSI (2021). Best practice manual for the investigation of fires and explosions. Available online at: www.enfsi.eu.

  • 202

    Environmentagency (2023). Waste criminals targeted on Environment Agency day of action – creating a better place. Available online at: https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2023/01/16/waste-criminals-targeted-on-environment-agency-day-of-action/.

  • 203

    Erturan A. M. Durmaz H. Gultekin S. S. (2023). Simultaneous detection of molecules with the surface-enhanced infrared absorption sensor platform based on disk antennas with double spacer. Spectrosc. Lett.56, 283292. 10.1080/00387010.2023.2208650

  • 204

    Esmaelpourfarkhani M. Danesh N. M. Ramezani M. Alibolandi M. Abdolabadi A. K. Abnous K. et al (2023). Split aptamer-based fluorescent biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of cocaine using N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX as fluorophore. Microchem. J.190, 108630. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108630

  • 205

    Estevez A. Perez N. Casanova-Chafer J. Llobet E. Beriain A. (2022). RFID gas sensor for in-field detection of chemical threats: evaluation of batteryless discontinuous operation. IEEE Sensors, 14. 10.1109/sensors52175.2022.9967213

  • 206

    Evidential Drug Identification Testing (2023). Good practice guide-2023 handling instructions update history. London, United Kingdom: National Police Chiefs’ Council: Forensic Capability Network.

  • 207

    Fakayode S. O. Lisse C. Medawala W. Brady P. N. Bwambok D. K. Anum D. et al (2023). Fluorescent chemical sensors: applications in analytical, environmental, forensic, pharmaceutical, biological, and biomedical sample measurement, and clinical diagnosis. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.59, 189. 10.1080/05704928.2023.2177666

  • 208

    Fan B. Wang Y. C. Li Z. H. Xun D. J. Dong J. Zhao X. W. et al (2022). Si@Ag@PEI substrate-based SERS sensor for rapid detection of illegally adulterated sulfur dioxide in traditional Chinese medicine. Talanta238, 122988. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122988

  • 209

    Fan Z. A. Chen X. Kong R. R. Lu Y. Q. Ma R. L. Wu J. W. et al (2023). Strongly fluorescent conjugated polymer nanoparticles in aqueous colloidal solution for universal, efficient and effective development of sebaceous and blood fingerprints. J. Colloid Interface Sci.642, 658668. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.173

  • 210

    Fang W. Zhang B. Han F. Y. Qin Z. N. Feng Y. Q. Hu J. M. et al (2020). On-site and quantitative detection of trace methamphetamine in urine/serum samples with a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active microcavity and rapid pretreatment device. Anal. Chem.92 (19), 1353913549. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03041

  • 211

    Fang Y. L. Wang Z. Quan Q. Q. Li Z. D. Pan K. L. Lei Y. et al (2023). Developing an ultrasensitive immunochromatographic assay for authentication of an emergent fraud aminopyrine in herbal tea. Food Chem.406, 135065. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135065

  • 212

    Far B. F. Naimi-Jamal M. R. Jahanbakhshi M. Mohammed H. T. Altimari U. S. Ansari J. (2022). Poly(3-thienylboronic acid) coated magnetic nanoparticles as a magnetic solid-phase adsorbent for extraction of methamphetamine from urine samples. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol.44, 27232733. 10.1080/01932691.2022.2124169

  • 213

    Fedick P. W. Pu F. Morato N. M. Cooks R. G. (2020). Identification and confirmation of fentanyls on paper using portable surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.31 (3), 735741. 10.1021/jasms.0c00004

  • 214

    Feng W. Liu X. J. Xue M. J. Song Q. H. (2023). Bifunctional fluorescent probes for the detection of mustard gas and phosgene. Anal. Chem.95, 17551763. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05178

  • 215

    Ferrari A. G. M. Crapnell R. D. Banks C. E. (2021). Electroanalytical overview: electrochemical sensing platforms for food and drink safety. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (8), 291. 10.3390/bios11080291

  • 216

    Ferrari A. G. M. Elbardisy H. M. Silva V. Belal T. S. Talaat W. Daabees H. G. et al (2020). The influence of lateral flake size in graphene/graphite paste electrodes: an electroanalytical investigation. Anal. METHODS12 (16), 21332142. 10.1039/d0ay00169d

  • 217

    Ferreira P. A. de Oliveira F. M. de Melo E. I. de Carvalho A. E. Lucca B. G. Ferreira V. S. et al (2021b). Multi sensor compatible 3D-printed electrochemical cell for voltammetric drug screening. Anal. Chim. Acta1169, 338568. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338568

  • 218

    Ferreira R. G. Paula R. B. A. Okuma A. A. Costa L. M. (2021a). Fingerprint development techniques: a review. Rev. VIRTUAL De. QUIMICA.13 (6), 12781302. 10.21577/1984-6835.20210083

  • 219

    Fingerprint Identification (2024). “Biometric authentication,”. Tokyo, Japan: NEC Corporation. Available online at: https://www.nec.com/en/global/solutions/biometrics/fingerprint/index.html.

  • 220

    Firmino E. da Silva Oliveira L. Borges Martins F. C. Filho J. C. S. Barbosa H. P. Andrade A. A. et al (2021). Eu3+-doped SiO2–Y2O3 containing Sr2+ for application as fingerprinting detector. Opt. Mater (Amst).114, 111018. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111018

  • 221

    Food Allergen Testing (2025). Food safety neogen. Available online at: https://www.neogen.com/en-gb/categories/allergens/.

  • 222

    Food Safety News (2025). UK’s food crime unit reveals risks and progress on investigations. Chicago, IL: Food Safety News. Available online at: https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/12/uks-food-crime-unit-reveals-risks-and-progress-on-investigations/#google_vignette.

  • 223

    Food Standards Agency (2025a). “The cost of food crime phase 2 - results,”. London, United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency (FSA). Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/research/the-cost-of-food-crime-phase-2-results.

  • 224

    Food Standards Agency (2025b). “Food crime,”. London, United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency. Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/safety-hygiene/food-crime.

  • 225

    Food Standards Agency (2025c). Food standards agency. Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/.

  • 226

    Forbes T. P. Krauss S. T. Gillen G. (2020). Trace detection and chemical analysis of homemade fuel-oxidizer mixture explosives: emerging challenges and perspectives. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.131, 116023. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116023

  • 227

    Forensic Body Fluid Analysis Services (2024). Forensic access. Available online at: https://www.forensic-access.co.uk/forensic-services/biology/body-fluid-analysis/.

  • 228

    Forensics Library (2024). “Bodily fluids analysis,”. United Kingdom: The Forensics Library. Available online at: https://aboutforensics.co.uk/bodily-fluids-analysis/.

  • 229

    Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (2021). Advancing fire scene investigations with field portable technologies. Available online at: https://forensiccoe.org/advancing-fire-scene-investigations/.

  • 230

    Fouad R. Saif M. (2020). Synthesis, spectroscopic and photoluminescence studies of novel Eu3+ nanophosphor complex as fluorescent sensor for highly sensitive detection of latent fingerprints and anti-counterfeiting. J. Mol. Struct.1217, 128472. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128472

  • 231

    Fouda-Mbanga B. G. Pillay K. Tywabi-Ngeva Z. (2023). Novel development of zinc oxide-coated carbon nanoparticles from pineapple leaves using sol gel method for optimal adsorption of Cu2+ and reuse in latent fingerprint application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31, 3880138820. 10.1007/s11356-023-25474-y

  • 232

    Fouda-Mbanga B. G. Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2022). Cd2+ ion adsorption and re-use of spent adsorbent with N-doped carbon nanoparticles coated on cerium oxide nanorods nanocomposite for fingerprint detection. Chem. Phys. IMPACT5, 100083. 10.1016/j.chphi.2022.100083

  • 233

    Fularz A. Almohammed S. Rice J. H. (2021). SERS enhancement of porphyrin-type molecules on metal-free cellulose-based substrates. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.9 (49), 1680816819. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06685

  • 234

    Fulgencio A. C. C. Resende G. A. P. Teixeira M. C. F. Botelho B. G. Sena M. M. (2022). Screening method for the rapid detection of diethylene glycol in beer based on chemometrics and portable near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem.391, 133258. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133258

  • 235

    Galan-Malo P. Pellicer S. Pérez M. D. Sánchez L. Razquin P. Mata L. (2019). Development of a novel duplex lateral flow test for simultaneous detection of casein and β-lactoglobulin in food. Food Chem.293, 4148. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.039

  • 236

    Ganesan M. Nagaraaj P. (2020). Quantum dots as nanosensors for detection of toxics: a literature review. Anal. METHODS12 (35), 42544275. 10.1039/d0ay01293a

  • 237

    Gao R. Li D. Zhang Q. Zheng S. Ren X. Deng W. (2021). GNPs-QDs core–satellites assembly: trimodal platform for on-site identification and detection of TNT in complex media. Sens. Actuators B Chem.328, 128960. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128960

  • 238

    Gao R. Song X. Zhan C. Weng C. Cheng S. Guo K. et al (2020). Light trapping induced flexible wrinkled nanocone SERS substrate for highly sensitive explosive detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem.314, 128081. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128081

  • 239

    Garcia-Cruz A. Ahmad O. S. Alanazi K. Piletska E. Piletsky S. A. (2020). Generic sensor platform based on electro-responsive molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles (e-NanoMIPs). Microsystems and Nanoeng.6 (1), 8389. 10.1038/s41378-020-00193-3

  • 240

    Garima I. Sachdev A. Matai I. (2022a). An electrochemical sensor based on cobalt oxyhydroxide nanoflakes/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for detection of illicit drug-clonazepam. J. Electroanal. Chem.919, 116537. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116537

  • 241

    Garima P. V. Mehta S. K. Sharma S. (2022b). Selective response studies of graphene materials with forensic relevant drugs through fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Anal. Chem.77 (4), 495504. 10.1134/s1061934822040062

  • 242

    Garrido E. Alfonso M. de Greñu B. D. Lozano-Torres B. Parra M. Gaviña P. et al (2020). Nanosensor for sensitive detection of the new psychedelic drug 25I-NBOMe. CHEMISTRY-A Eur. J.26 (13), 28132816. 10.1002/chem.201905688

  • 243

    Garrido E. Hernández-Sigüenza G. Climent E. Marcos M. D. Rurack K. Gaviña P. et al (2023). Strip-based lateral flow-type indicator displacement assay for γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) detection in beverages. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL377, 133043. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.133043

  • 244

    Gasser A. Shcheglov A. Lapauw T. Dries T. V. den Ingelberts H. Hoving W. et al (2022). Miniaturized time-resolved fluorescence spectrometer system, 12008. Bellingham, WA: SPIE (The International Society for Optics and Photonics), 23. 10.1117/12.2609535

  • 245

    Gaudin V. (2021). Contribution of nanomaterials to the development of electrochemical aptasensors for the detection of antimicrobial residues in food products. CHEMOSENSORS9 (4), 69. 10.3390/chemosensors9040069

  • 246

    Gautam R. Chaturvedi D. Sil S. Kuhar N. Singh S. Umapathy S. (2022). Characterization of aggregating agents towards sensitive optical detection of tryptophan using lab-on-a-chip. Photonics9 (9), 648. 10.3390/photonics9090648

  • 247

    Ge W. Suryoprabowo S. Kuang H. Liu L. Song S. (2020). Rapid detection of triazophos in cucumber using lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 10511060. 10.1080/0954010520201816919

  • 248

    Geballa-Koukoula A. Ross G. M. S. Bosman A. J. Zhao Y. Zhou H. Nielen M. W. F. et al (2023). Best practices and current implementation of emerging smartphone-based (bio)sensors-Part 2: development, validation, and social impact. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.161, 116986. 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116986

  • 249

    Geng L. J. Liu M. Y. Huang J. C. Li F. L. Zhang Y. Y. Guo Y. M. et al (2023). Novel dual-signal SiO2-COOH@MIPs electrochemical sensor for highly sensitive detection of chloramphenicol in milk. SENSORS23 (3), 1346. 10.3390/s23031346

  • 250

    Geng P. F. Sun S. J. Wang X. M. Ma L. Guo C. Li J. T. et al (2022). Rapid and sensitive detection of amphetamine by SERS-based competitive immunoassay coupled with magnetic separation. Anal. METHODS14 (26), 26082615. 10.1039/d2ay00581f

  • 251

    Geng Z. Zhang X. Fan Z. Lv X. Su Y. Chen H. (2017). Recent progress in optical biosensors based on smartphone platforms. Sensors17 (11), 2449. 10.3390/s17112449

  • 252

    Ghorbanizamani F. Moulahoum H. Celik E. G. Timur S. (2022). Ionic liquid-hydrogel hybrid material for enhanced electron transfer and sensitivity towards electrochemical detection of methamphetamine. J. Mol. Liq.361, 119627. 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119627

  • 253

    Ghubish Z. El-Kemary M. (2022). Influence of Li+ doping on the luminescence performance of green nano-phosphor CaWO4:Tb3+ as a sweat pores fingerprint and cheiloscopy sensor. J. INDUSTRIAL Eng. Chem.107, 6174. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.11.026

  • 254

    Ghubish Z. Saif M. Hafez H. Mahmoud H. Kamal R. El-Kemary M. (2020). Novel red photoluminescence sensor based on Europium ion doped calcium hydroxy stannate CaSn(OH)6:Eu+3 for latent fingerprint detection. J. Mol. Struct.1207, 127840. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127840

  • 255

    Gill A. Hickey B. Zhong W. Hooley R. (2020). Selective sensing of THC and related metabolites in biofluids by host:guest arrays. ChemComm R. Soc. Chem.56, 43524355. 10.1039/d0cc01489c

  • 256

    Girmatsion M. Mahmud A. Abraha B. Xie Y. F. Cheng Y. L. Yu H. et al (2021). Rapid detection of antibiotic residues in animal products using surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: a review. Food control.126, 108019. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108019

  • 257

    Glasscott M. W. Vannoy K. J. Fernando P. Kosgei G. K. Moores L. C. Dick J. E. (2020). Electrochemical sensors for the detection of fentanyl and its analogs: foundations and recent advances. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.132, 116037. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116037

  • 258

    Goel R. Awasthi V. Bhardwaj V. Dubey S. K. (2022). “Flexible and cost-effective substrate for detection of analytes using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS),” in Proc. SPIE 12131, nanophotonics IX, 103.

  • 259

    Gonzalez M. Gorziza R. P. Mariotti K. D. Limberger R. P. (2020). Methodologies applied to fingerprint analysis. J. Forensic Sci.65 (4), 10401048. 10.1111/1556-4029.14313

  • 260

    González-Hernández J. Moya-Alvarado G. Alvarado-Gámez A. L. Urcuyo R. Barquero-Quirós M. Arcos-Martínez M. J. (2022b). Electrochemical biosensor for quantitative determination of fentanyl based on immobilized cytochrome c on multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified screen-printed carbon electrodes. Microchim. ACTA189 (12), 483. 10.1007/s00604-022-05578-x

  • 261

    González-Hernández J. Ott C. E. Arcos-Martínez M. J. Colina A. Heras A. Alvarado-Gámez A. L. et al (2022a). Rapid determination of the “legal highs” 4-MMC and 4-MEC by spectroelectrochemistry: simultaneous cyclic voltammetry and in situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. SENSORS22 (1). 10.3390/s22010295

  • 262

    Gooch J. Daniel B. Frascione N. (2014). Application of fluorescent substrates to the in situ detection of prostate specific antigen. Talanta125, 210214. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.02.021

  • 263

    Gove R. J. (2014). “Complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors for mobile devices,” in High performance silicon imaging. Editor DuriniD. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing (an imprint of Elsevier)), 191234.

  • 264

    Gozdzialski L. Wallace B. Hore D. (2023). Point-of-care community drug checking technologies: an insider look at the scientific principles and practical considerations. Harm Reduct. J.20 (1), 39. 10.1186/s12954-023-00764-3

  • 265

    Gross J. H. (2017). “Mass spectrometry: a textbook,”. 3rd ed. Springer.

  • 266

    Grothe R. A. Lobato A. Mounssef B. Tasić N. Braga A. A. C. Maldaner A. O. et al (2021). Electroanalytical profiling of cocaine samples by means of an electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymer using benzocaine as the template molecule. Analyst.146 (5), 17471759. 10.1039/d0an02274h

  • 267

    Guan T. Jiang Z. Liang Z. Q. Liu Y. J. Huang W. J. Li X. M. et al (2022). Single-emission dual-enzyme magnetosensor for multiplex immunofluorometric assay of adulterated colorants in chili seasoning. Food Chem.366, 130594. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130594

  • 268

    Guidance (2014). How we respond to marine pollution incidents - GOV. Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Marine Management Organisation (MMO). Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-we-respond-to-marine-pollution-incidents.

  • 269

    Guleria A. Chavan A. P. Neogy S. Gandhi V. V. Kunwar A. Debnath A. K. et al (2020). Glutathione-Functionalized organosilicon oxide nanoparticles for bioimaging and forensics. ACS Appl. Nano Mater3 (6), 51235138. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00420

  • 270

    Guo G. X. Wang T. Ding X. Wang H. T. Wu Q. L. Zhang Z. W. et al (2022a). Fluorescent lanthanide metal-organic framework for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of methcathinone in human urine. Talanta249, 123663. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123663

  • 271

    Guo J. X. Liu Y. Ju H. X. Lu G. M. (2022b). From lab to field: surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sensing strategies for on-site analysis. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.146, 116488. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116488

  • 272

    Guo L. Wang Z. Xu X. Xu L. Kuang H. Xiao J. et al (2020). Europium nanosphere-based fluorescence strip sensor for ultrasensitive and quantitative determination of fumonisin B1. Anal. Methods12 (43), 52295235. 10.1039/d0ay01734e

  • 273

    Guo Y. Pan X. Cheng Y. Yu H. Xie Y. Yang F. et al (2021). Orientational screening of ssDNA-templated silver nanoclusters and application for bleomycin assay. Colloid Polym. Sci.299 (10), 16431649. 10.1007/s00396-021-04890-x

  • 274

    Guria U. N. Maiti K. Ali S. S. Gangopadhyay A. Samanta S. K. Roy K. et al (2020). An organic nanofibrous polymeric composite for ratiometric detection of diethyl chlorophosphate (DCP) in solution and vapor. ChemistrySelect5 (13), 37703777. 10.1002/slct.202000179

  • 275

    Gurusamy L. Karuppasamy L. Anandan S. Liu C. H. Wu J. (2022). Perovskite nanocomposite of defective yolk-shell BaHo2Co3O8-xfor electrochemical sensing of ractopamine in pork meat sample. Mater Today Chem.25, 100965. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.100965

  • 276

    Gusenbauer M. Haddaway N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods11 (2), 181217. 10.1002/jrsm.1378

  • 277

    Ha S. Kim J. Lee S. Yoo D. Bae J. Kim W. K. et al (2022). In situ, real-time, colorimetric detection of γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) using self-protection products coated with chemical receptor-embedded hydrogel. Biosens. Bioelectron.207, 114195. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114195

  • 278

    Haghighi M. Shahlaei M. Irandoust M. Hassanpour A. (2020). New and sensitive sensor for voltammetry determination of Methamphetamine in biological samples. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.31 (14), 1098911000. 10.1007/s10854-020-03647-6

  • 279

    Hakeem M. K. Shah A. Nisar J. Iftikhar F. J. Khan S. B. Shah I. (2022). Electrochemical sensing platform for the detection and degradation studies of metanil yellow. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (5), 056503. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6981

  • 280

    Han Q. Liang Y. Li Z. H. Song Y. L. Wang Y. X. Zhang X. R. (2022). Tunable multicolor emission based on dual-mode luminescence Y2O3: Eu@SiO2/Y2O3: Er(Tm/Yb) composite nanomaterials. J. Lumin241, 118541. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118541

  • 281

    Han S. Sun R. N. Zhao L. Yan C. Chu H. T. (2023). Molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor based on synergistic interaction of honeycomb-like Ni-MOF decorated with AgNPs and N-GQDs for ultra-sensitive detection of olaquindox in animal-origin food. Food Chem.418, 136001. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136001

  • 282

    Han S. Zhang C. Lin S. Sha X. Hasi W. (2021). Sensitive and reliable identification of fentanyl citrate in urine and serum using chloride ion-treated paper-based SERS substrate. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.251, 119463. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119463

  • 283

    Han S. Zhang C. Sha X. Y. Li N. Hasi W. Zhang Y. H. (2020). Effective SERS method for identification of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in biological samples. Anal. METHODS12 (12), 16621669. 10.1039/d0ay00019a

  • 284

    Hang Y. J. Boryczka J. Wu N. Q. (2022). Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: a review. Chem. Soc. Rev.51 (1), 329375. 10.1039/c9cs00621d

  • 285

    Hao H. M. Ye Z. J. Dai H. Liu C. Yi A. H. Xu B. J. et al (2021). Pyrenyl-based aggregation-induced emission luminogen for highly sensitive and selective detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in water. ChemistrySelect6 (43), 1218212187. 10.1002/slct.202103098

  • 286

    Harathi J. Thenmozhi K. (2022). Water-soluble ionic liquid as a fluorescent probe towards distinct binding and detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol in aqueous medium. Chemosphere286, 131825. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131825

  • 287

    Harbison S. Fleming R. (2016). Forensic body fluid identification: state of the art. Res. Rep. Forensic Med. Sci.6, 1123. 10.2147/rrfms.s57994

  • 288

    Hardy M. Kelleher L. Gomes P. D. Buchan E. Chu H. O. M. Oppenheimer P. G. (2022). Methods in Raman spectroscopy for saliva studies - a review. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.57 (3), 177233. 10.1080/05704928.2021.1969944

  • 289

    Harish V. Tewari D. Gaur M. Yadav A. B. Swaroop S. Bechelany M. et al (2022). Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, antimicrobial, and agro-food applications. Nanomaterials12 (3), 457. 10.3390/nano12030457

  • 290

    Harsha K. G. Appalanaidu E. Rao B. A. Baggi T. R. Rao V. J. (2020). ON–OFF fluorescent imidazole derivative for sensitive and selective detection of copper(II) ions. Russ. J. Org. Chem.56 (1), 158168. 10.1134/s1070428020010248

  • 291

    Harshey A. Srivastava A. Das T. Nigam K. Shrivastava R. Yadav V. K. (2021). Trends in gunshot residue detection by electrochemical methods for forensic purpose. J. Analysis Test.5 (3), 258269. 10.1007/s41664-020-00152-x

  • 292

    He D. Wu Z. Cui B. Xu E. Jin Z. (2019). Establishment of a dual mode immunochromatographic assay for Campylobacter jejuni detection. Food Chem.289, 708713. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.106

  • 293

    He F. Yang J. Y. Zou T. T. Xu Z. L. Tian Y. X. Sun W. J. et al (2021). A gold nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for simultaneous detection of multiplex sildenafil adulterants in health food by only one antibody. Anal. Chim. Acta1141, 112. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.032

  • 294

    He X. Liu Y. Liu Y. Cui S. Liu W. Li Z. (2020a). Controllable fabrication of Ag-NP-decorated porous ZnO nanosheet arrays with superhydrophobic properties for high performance SERS detection of explosives. CrystEngComm.22 (4), 776785. 10.1039/c9ce01430f

  • 295

    He X. C. Yang S. J. Xu T. L. Song Y. C. Zhang X. J. (2020b). Microdroplet-captured tapes for rapid sampling and SERS detection of food contaminants. Biosens. Bioelectron.152, 112013. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112013

  • 296

    Higgins S. Kurouski D. (2023). Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy enables highly accurate identification of different brands, types and colors of hair dyes. Talanta251, 123762. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123762

  • 297

    Hitabatuma A. Wang P. L. Su X. O. Ma M. M. (2022). Metal-organic frameworks-based sensors for food safety. FOODS11 (3), 382. 10.3390/foods11030382

  • 298

    Holliday K. (2016). Luminescence spectroscopy, inorganic condensed matter applications. Encycl. Spectrosc. Spectrom., 627635. 10.1016/b978-0-12-803224-4.00174-6

  • 299

    Honeychurch K. C. (2019). Review of electroanalytical-based approaches for the determination of benzodiazepines. Biosensors9 (4), 130. 10.3390/bios9040130

  • 300

    Hong Y. Li M. L. Wang Z. H. Xu B. Y. Zhang Y. T. Wang S. X. et al (2022). Engineered optoplasmonic core-satellite microspheres for SERS determination of methamphetamine derivative and its precursors. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL358, 131437. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131437

  • 301

    Hu A. Q. Chen G. Q. Yang T. Q. Ma C. Q. Li L. Gao H. et al (2022a). A fluorescent probe based on FRET effect between carbon nanodots and gold nanoparticles for sensitive detection of thiourea. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.281, 121582. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121582

  • 302

    Hu J. X. Chen C. Xie X. B. Zhang L. C. Song H. J. Lv Y. (2023). Instant fingerprint discrimination for military explosive vapors by Dy3+Doping a La2O3-based cataluminescence sensor system. Anal. Chem.95, 35163524. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05678

  • 303

    Hu M. Han Q. Y. Xing B. G. (2020b). Metallic nanoparticle-enabled sensing of a drug-of-abuse: an attempt at forensic application. CHEMBIOCHEM21 (17), 25122517. 10.1002/cbic.202000157

  • 304

    Hu P. Sun Z. T. Shen Y. W. Pan Y. W. (2021). A long-term stable sensor based on Fe@PCN-224 for rapid and quantitative detection of H2O2 in fishery products. FOODS10 (2), 419. 10.3390/foods10020419

  • 305

    Hu R. Yan Y. B. Jiang L. Huang C. X. Shen X. T. (2022b). Determination of total cathinones with a single molecularly imprinted fluorescent sensor assisted by electromembrane microextraction. Microchim. ACTA189 (9), 324. 10.1007/s00604-022-05405-3

  • 306

    Hu S. J. Cao Z. Y. Zhou L. Ma R. L. Su B. (2020a). Electrochemiluminescence imaging of latent fingerprints by electropolymerized luminol. J. Electroanal. Chem.870, 114238. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114238

  • 307

    Hua Z. Yu T. Liu D. H. Xianyu Y. L. (2021). Recent advances in gold nanoparticles-based biosensors for food safety detection. Biosens. Bioelectron.179, 113076. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113076

  • 308

    Huang C. Wang J. Y. Lin J. R. L. Huang W. He Y. (2022a). Improved colorimetric detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene through γ-cyclodextrin complexation. FORENSIC Chem.30, 100444. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100444

  • 309

    Huang C. L. Jiang S. P. Kou F. X. Guo M. T. Li S. Yu G. J. et al (2022c). Development of jellyfish-like ZnO@Ag substrate for sensitive SERS detection of melamine in milk. Appl. Surf. Sci.600, 154153. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154153

  • 310

    Huang W. Fan D. S. Li W. F. Meng Y. Y. Liu T. C. Y. (2022b). Rapid evaluation of milk acidity and identification of milk adulteration by Raman spectroscopy combined with chemometrics analysis. Vib. Spectrosc.123, 103440. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2022.103440

  • 311

    Huang X. Huang X. Xie J. Li X. Huang Z. (2020). Rapid simultaneous detection of fumonisin B1 and deoxynivalenol in grain by immunochromatographic test strip. Anal. Biochem.606, 113878. 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113878

  • 312

    Hue-Roye K. Vege S. (2008). Principles of PCR-based assays. Immunohematology24 (2), 170175. 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-294

  • 313

    Hung K. Moon R. Roese E. Tripathi A. Emmons E. Wilcox P. et al (2022). “Enabling detection technologies for explosive threats,” in Proc. SPIE 12116, chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) sensing XXIII, 12116, 1221.

  • 314

  • 315

    IDEMIA (2025). “Tenprint scanners for live scan fingerprint,”. Courbevoie, France: IDEMIA. Available online at: https://www.idemia.com/tenprint-scanners.

  • 316

    Ilhan H. Tayyarcan E. K. Caglayan M. G. Boyaci İ. H. Saglam N. Tamer U. (2021). Replacement of antibodies with bacteriophages in lateral flow assay of Salmonella Enteritidis. Biosens. Bioelectron.189, 113383. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113383

  • 317

    Illston-Baggs G. Deacon P. Ivanova J. Nichols-Drew L. Farrugia K. J. (2021). A pseudo-operational trial: an investigation into the use of longwave reflected UV imaging of cyanoacrylate developed fingermarks. Forensic Sci. Int.325, 110871. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110871

  • 318

    Izham N. Z. M. Yusoff H. M. Asari A. B. Bhat I. U. H. (2022). Potential recognition layer in electrochemical sensor: a comparative characterization of p-cyano schiff base compounds. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem.12 (2), 18031813. 10.33263/BRIAC122.18031813

  • 319

    Jalili R. Khataee A. (2020). Application of molecularly imprinted polymers and dual-emission carbon dots hybrid for ratiometric determination of chloramphenicol in milk. FOOD Chem. Toxicol.146, 111806. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111806

  • 320

    Jamieson O. Mecozzi F. Crapnell R. D. Battell W. Hudson A. Novakovic K. et al (2021). Approaches to the rational design of molecularly imprinted polymers developed for the selective extraction or detection of antibiotics in environmental and food samples. Phys. STATUS SOLIDI A-APPLICATIONS Mater. Sci.218 (13). 10.1002/pssa.202100021

  • 321

    Jang S. Son S. U. Kang B. Kim J. Lim J. Seo S. et al (2022). Electrospun nanofibrous membrane-based colorimetric device for rapid and simple screening of amphetamine-type stimulants in drinks. Anal. Chem.94 (8), 35353542. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04512

  • 322

    Jenie S. N. A. Krismastuti F. S. H. Ningrum Y. P. Kristiani A. Yuniati M. D. Astuti W. et al (2020). Geothermal silica-based fluorescent nanoparticles for the visualization of latent fingerprints. Mater. EXPRESS10 (2), 258266. 10.1166/mex.2020.1551

  • 323

    Jeong H. J. Dong J. Yeom C. H. Ueda H. (2020). Synthesis of quenchbodies for one-pot detection of stimulant drug methamphetamine. Methods Protoc.3 (2), 43. 10.3390/mps3020043

  • 324

    Jiang Q. Y. Li D. Liu Y. H. Mao Z. S. Yu Y. J. Zhu P. et al (2021a). Recyclable and green AuBPs@MoS2@tinfoil box for high throughput SERS tracking of diquat in complex compounds. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL344, 130290. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130290

  • 325

    Jiang X. Wu F. S. Huang X. Y. He S. Han Q. Y. Zhang Z. H. et al (2023). Fabrication of a molecularly-imprinted-polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposite for electrochemical sensing of new psychoactive substances. NANOMATERIALS13 (4), 751. 10.3390/nano13040751

  • 326

    Jiang Y. X. Cong S. Song G. Sun H. Z. Zhang W. Yao W. R. et al (2021b). Defective cuprous oxide as a selective surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor of dye adulteration in Chinese herbal medicines. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.52 (7), 12651274. 10.1002/jrs.6127

  • 327

    Jin Z. Zheng W. W. Liu Y. M. Xu Z. Zhao Y. (2023). Facile preparation of electroactive Au@Ru cups for sensitive detection of bisphenol A. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.11 (20), 76737682. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07570

  • 328

    Jindal G. Kaur N. (2023). Barbituric acid appended fluorescent sensor for the detection of Cu2+/Hg2+ions along with real-life utility in recognition of malathionin food samples and fingerprint imaging. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY.434, 114238. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114238

  • 329

    Jing M. Y. Zhang H. Li M. Mao Z. Shi X. M. (2021). Silver nanoparticle-decorated TiO2 nanotube array for solid-phase microextraction and SERS detection of antibiotic residue in milk. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.255, 119652. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119652

  • 330

    Joao A. F. Rocha R. G. Matias T. A. Richter E. M. Petruci J. F. S. Muñoz R. A. A. (2021). 3D-printing in forensic electrochemistry: atropine determination in beverages using an additively manufactured graphene-polylactic acid electrode. Microchem. J.167, 106324. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106324

  • 331

    Joosten F. Parrilla M. van Nuijs A. L. N. Ozoemena K. I. De Wael K. (2022). Electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in oral fluid: potential for forensic drug testing. Electrochim Acta436, 141309. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141309

  • 332

    Jornet-Martinez N. Campins-Falco P. Herraez-Hernandez R. (2021). A colorimetric membrane-based sensor with improved selectivity towards amphetamine. MOLECULES26 (21), 6713. 10.3390/molecules26216713

  • 333

    Junaid H. M. Waseem M. T. Khan Z. A. Gul H. Yu C. Shaikh A. J. et al (2022). Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for selective detection of TNT and TNP explosives in aqueous medium through fluorescence emission enhancement mechanism. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY428, 113865. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113865

  • 334

    Justino C. I. L. Duarte A. C. Rocha-Santos T. A. P. (2017). Recent progress in biosensors for environmental monitoring: a review. Sensors17 (12), 2918. 10.3390/s17122918

  • 335

    Kabel K. I. Labena A. Gado W. S. (2021). Novel, low cost and fast detection sensor for biogenic H2S gas based on polyaniline/ZnO, CdO and CeO2 nanocomposites at room temperature. Egypt J. Chem.64 (6), 0104. 10.21608/ejchem.2021.60970.3308

  • 336

    Kadhim M. M. Abdullaha S. A. Taban T. Z. Alomar T. Almasoud N. Hachim S. K. (2023). Strong reactivity and electronic sensitivity of Au-decorated BC3 nanotubes toward the phenylpropanolamine drug. Appl. Phys. A-MATERIALS Sci. and Process.129 (3), 232. 10.1007/s00339-023-06431-5

  • 337

    Kadu R. D. Keri R. S. Nagaraju D. H. Budagumpi S. (2023). State-of-the-art electrochemical sensors for quantitative detection of pesticides. Appl. Organomet. Chem.37. 10.1002/aoc.7097

  • 338

    Kaewnu K. Promsuwan K. Phonchai A. Thiangchanya A. Somapa D. Somapa N. et al (2021). Cost-effective foam-based colorimetric sensor for roadside testing of alcohol in undiluted saliva. CHEMOSENSORS9 (12), 334. 10.3390/chemosensors9120334

  • 339

    Kajale S. N. Yadav S. Cai Y. B. Joy B. Sarkar D. (2021). 2D material based field effect transistors and nanoelectromechanical systems for sensing applications. iScience24 (12), 103513. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103513

  • 340

    Kamal R. Saif M. (2020). Barium tungstate doped with terbium ion green nanophosphor: low temperature preparation, characterization and potential applications. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.229, 117928. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117928

  • 341

    Kamel S. Khattab T. A. (2020). Recent advances in cellulose-based biosensors for medical diagnosis. Biosens. (Basel).10 (6), 67. 10.3390/bios10060067

  • 342

    Kang D. Jeon E. Kim S. Lee J. (2020b). Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanomaterials: recent advances and applications. BioChip J.14 (1), 124135. 10.1007/s13206-020-4111-9

  • 343

    Kang J. H. Kim Y. T. Lee K. Kim H. M. Lee K. G. Ahn J. et al (2020a). An electrophoretic DNA extraction device using a nanofilter for molecular diagnosis of pathogens. Nanoscale12 (8), 50485054. 10.1039/c9nr10675h

  • 344

    Kanodarwala F. K. Leśniewski A. Olszowska-Łoś I. Spindler X. Pieta I. S. Lennard C. et al (2021). Fingermark detection using upconverting nanoparticles and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming. Forensic Sci. Int.326, 110915. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110915

  • 345

    Karadurmus L. Bilge S. Sinag A. Ozkan S. A. (2022). Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-Based sensing for detection of explosives: current perspectives and future applications. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.155, 116694. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116694

  • 346

    Karimi-Maleh H. Karimi F. Alizadeh M. Sanati A. L. (2020). Electrochemical sensors, a bright future in the fabrication of portable kits in analytical systems. Chem. Rec.20 (7), 682692. 10.1002/tcr.201900092

  • 347

    Karuppaiah B. Jeyaraman A. Chen S. M. Chavan P. R. Karthik R. Shim J. J. et al (2023). Design and synthesis of nickel-doped cobalt molybdate microrods: an effective electrocatalyst for the determination of antibiotic drug ronidazole. Environ. Res.222, 115343. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115343

  • 348

    Kasry A. Nicol A. Knoll W. (2021). Grating-coupled surface-plasmon fluorescence DNA sensor. Appl. Phys. B127 (5), 6812. 10.1007/s00340-021-07619-4

  • 349

    Kathiravan A. Gowri A. Srinivasan V. Smith T. A. Ashokkumar M. Jhonsi M. A. (2020). A simple and ubiquitous device for picric acid detection in latent fingerprints using carbon dots. ANALYST.145 (13), 45324539. 10.1039/d0an00750a

  • 350

    Kazakevich Y. V. Lobrutto R. (2007). HPLC for pharmaceutical scientists. John Wiley and Sons.

  • 351

    Ke X. Fan Y. Zhou J. Huang Z. (2020). A novel coumarin-derived dithioacetal chemosensor for trace detection of Hg2+ in real water samples. J. Chem. Res.44 (3–4), 142147. 10.1177/1747519819890561

  • 352

    Khajouei S. Ravan H. Ebrahimi A. (2020). Developing a colorimetric nucleic acid-responsive DNA hydrogel using DNA proximity circuit and catalytic hairpin assembly. Anal. Chim. Acta.1137, 110. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.08.059

  • 353

    Khan S. Hazra A. Dutta B. Akhtaruzzaman Md. Raihan M. J. Banerjee P. et al (2021). Strategic design of anthracene-decorated highly luminescent coordination polymers for selective and rapid detection of TNP: an explosive nitro derivative and mutagenic pollutant. Cryst. Growth Des.21 (6), 33443354. 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00145

  • 354

    Khayal A. Dawane V. Amin M. A. Tirth V. Yadav V. K. Algahtani A. et al (2021). Advances in the methods for the synthesis of carbon dots and their emerging applications. Polym. (Basel)13 (18), 3190. 10.3390/polym13183190

  • 355

    Khinevich N. Bandarenka H. Zavatski S. Girel K. Tamuleviciene A. Tamulevicius T. et al (2021). Porous silicon-A versatile platform for mass-production of ultrasensitive SERS-active substrates. MICROPOROUS MESOPOROUS Mater.323, 111204. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111204

  • 356

    Khorablou Z. Shahdost-Fard F. Razmi H. (2022). Voltammetric determination of pethidine in biofluids at a carbon cloth electrode modified by carbon selenide nanofilm. Talanta239, 123131. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123131

  • 357

    Khorablou Z. Shahdost-fard F. Razmi H. Yola M. L. Karimi-Maleh H. (2021). Recent advances in developing optical and electrochemical sensors for analysis of methamphetamine: a review. Chemosphere278, 130393. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130393

  • 358

    Khunoana S. Parani S. Oluwafemi O. S. Ndinteh D. T. Pillay K. (2020). Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Crinum macowanii bulb extracts and the application of these materials in blood detections at crime scenes. LUMINESCENCE35 (2), 187195. 10.1002/bio.3710

  • 359

    Kim G. Lee J. Jeong S. Kim M. (2022). Development of a CsI(Tl) scintillator based gamma probe for the identification of nuclear materials in unknown areas. J. Instrum.17 (03), P03005. 10.1088/1748-0221/17/03/p03005

  • 360

    Kim J. (2017). “Multifunctional smart biopolymer composites as actuators,” in Biopolymer composites in electronics (Elsevier Inc.), 311331.

  • 361

    Kim J. Park H. Kim J. Seo B. Kim J. H. (2020). SAW chemical array device coated with polymeric sensing materials for the detection of nerve agents. Sensors20 (24), 7028. 10.3390/s20247028

  • 362

    Kim T. H. (2021). Toward emerging innovations in electrochemical biosensing technology. Appl. Sci.11 (6), 2461. 10.3390/app11062461

  • 363

    King A. Singh R. Anand R. Behera S. K. Nayak B. B. (2021). Phase and luminescence behaviour of Ce-doped zirconia nanopowders for latent fingerprint visualisation. Opt. (Stuttg)242, 167087. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167087

  • 364

    Kishbaugh J. M. Cielski S. Fotusky A. Lighthart S. Maguire K. Quarino L. et al (2019). Detection of prostate specific antigen and salivary amylase in vaginal swabs using SERATEC® immunochromatographic assays. Forensic Sci. Int.304, 109899. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109899

  • 365

    Klimuntowski M. Alam M. M. Singh G. Howlader M. M. R. (2020). Electrochemical sensing of cannabinoids in biofluids: a noninvasive tool for drug detection. ACS Sens.5 (3), 620636. 10.1021/acssensors.9b02390

  • 366

    Kolacz A. M. Wisnik-Sawka M. Maziejuk M. Natora M. Harmata W. Rytel P. et al (2023). Air pollution and radiation monitoring in collective protection facilities. SENSORS23 (2), 706. 10.3390/s23020706

  • 367

    Kongkaew S. Tubtimtong S. Thavarungkul P. Kanatharana P. Chang K. H. Abdullah A. F. L. et al (2022). A fabrication of multichannel graphite electrode using low-cost stencil-printing technique. Sensors22 (8), 3034. 10.3390/s22083034

  • 368

    Köse K. Kehribar D. Y. Uzun L. (2021). Molecularly imprinted polymers in toxicology: a literature survey for the last 5 years. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (27), 3543735471. 10.1007/s11356-021-14510-4

  • 369

    Koshy K. Fowler A. J. Gundogan B. Agha R. A. (2018). Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?Int. J. Surg. Oncol. (N Y)3 (2), 56. 10.1097/ij9.0000000000000056

  • 370

    Kranenburg R. F. Ou F. Sevo P. Petruzzella M. de Ridder R. van Klinken A. et al (2022b). On-site illicit-drug detection with an integrated near-infrared spectral sensor: a proof of concept. Talanta245, 123441. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123441

  • 371

    Kranenburg R. F. Ramaker H. J. van Asten A. C. (2022a). Portable near infrared spectroscopy for the isomeric differentiation of new psychoactive substances. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)341, 111467. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111467

  • 372

    Kranenburg R. F. Ramaker H. J. Weesepoel Y. Arisz P. W. F. Keizers P. H. J. van Esch A. et al (2023). The influence of water of crystallization in NIR-based MDMA•HCl detection. FORENSIC Chem.32, 100464. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100464

  • 373

    Kranenburg R. F. Weesepoel Y. Alewijn M. Sap S. Arisz P. W. F. van Esch A. et al (2022c). The importance of wavelength selection in on-scene identification of drugs of abuse with portable near-infrared spectroscopy. FORENSIC Chem.30, 100437. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100437

  • 374

    Krishna S. Ahuja P. (2023). A chronological study of gunshot residue (GSR) detection techniques: a narrative review. Egypt J. Forensic Sci.13 (1), 5121. 10.1186/s41935-023-00369-8

  • 375

    Kulkarni M. B. Ayachit N. H. Aminabhavi T. M. (2022). Biosensors and microfluidic biosensors: from fabrication to application. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (7), 543. 10.3390/bios12070543

  • 376

    Kumar B. R. Jyothi V. Suresh V. Srikanth S. S. S. (2020a). Microcantilever sensor design - explosive detection through volatile organic compounds in humidity conditions. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun.13 (2), 8084. 10.1293/bio.13.80

  • 377

    Kumar N. Udayabhanu M. K. M. Nagaraju G. (2020c). Development and detection of level II and III features of latent fingerprints using highly sensitive AIE based coumarin fluorescent derivative. J. SCIENCE-ADVANCED Mater. DEVICES5 (4), 520526. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.09.004

  • 378

    Kumar S. Singh P. (2023). Visualization and dermatoglyphics of latent fingerprints (sweat pores): security ink for anticounterfeiting labels and case studies. J. Photochem Photobiol. A Chem.437, 114418. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114418

  • 379

    Kumar V. (2021a). Chromo-fluorogenic sensors for chemical warfare agents in real-time analysis: journey towards accurate detection and differentiation. Chem. Commun.57 (28), 34303444. 10.1039/d1cc00132a

  • 380

    Kumar V. (2021b). Design and development of a prototype for specific naked-eye detection of blister and nerve agents. Anal. METHODS13 (19), 22482255. 10.1039/d1ay00449b

  • 381

    Kumar V. Saini S. K. Choudhury N. Kumar A. Maiti B. De P. et al (2021). Highly sensitive detection of nitro compounds using a fluorescent copolymer-based FRET system. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater3 (8), 40174026. 10.1021/acsapm.1c00540

  • 382

    Kumar V. Vaid K. Bansal S. A. Kim K. H. (2020b). Nanomaterial-based immunosensors for ultrasensitive detection of pesticides/herbicides: current status and perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron.165, 112382. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112382

  • 383

    Kushwaha C. S. Singh P. Shukla S. K. Chehimi M. M. (2022). Advances in conducting polymer nanocomposite based chemical sensors: an overview. Mater. Sci. Eng. B-ADVANCED Funct. SOLID-STATE Mater.284, 115856. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115856

  • 384

    Kvachakhia L. L. Shormanov V. K. Banchukova E. A. (2020). Forensic chemical study of Amlodipine. Sud. Med. Ekspert.63 (6), 3944. 10.17116/sudmed20206306139

  • 385

    Kweitsu E. Armoo S. Kan-Dapaah K. Abavare E. Dodoo-Arhin D. Yaya A. (2021). Comparative study of phosgene gas sensing using carbon and boron nitride nanomaterials—a DFT approach. Molecules26 (1), 120. 10.3390/molecules26010120

  • 386

    Lai J. A. Long Z. W. Qiu J. B. Zhou D. C. Wang Q. Yang Y. et al (2020). Novel organic-inorganic hybrid powder SrGa12O19:Mn2+-ethyl cellulose for efficient latent fingerprint recognition via time-gated fluorescence. RSC Adv.10 (14), 82338243. 10.1039/d0ra00138d

  • 387

    Lal K. Noble F. Arif K. M. (2022). Methamphetamine detection using nanoparticle-based biosensors: a comprehensive review. Sens. Biosensing Res.38, 100538. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100538

  • 388

    Lan J. Sun W. Chen L. Zhou H. Fan Y. Diao X. et al (2020). Simultaneous and rapid detection of carbofuran and 3-hydroxy-carbofuran in water samples and pesticide preparations using lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 165175. 10.1080/09540105.2019.1708272

  • 389

    Latha N. Kavyashree D. Lavanya D. R. Darshan G. P. Malleshappa J. Nijalingappa T. B. et al (2021). Spectroscopic investigation of ultrasound assisted sonochemical synthesis of BiOCl: Dy3+ nanophosphors for latent fingerprints visualization. Inorg. Chem. Commun.134, 109039. 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.109039

  • 390

    Lavanya D. R. Darshan G. P. Malleshappa J. Premkumar H. B. Sharma S. C. Prasannakumar J. B. et al (2022). Surface engineered La2Zr2O7:Eu3+ nanophosphors: luminescent based platform for latent fingerprints visualization and anti-counterfeiting applications. SURFACES INTERFACES29, 101803. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.101803

  • 391

    Lee H. Saisahas K. R. Soleh A. Kunalan A. N. H. Chang K. H. Limbut W. et al (2022c). Forensic electrochemistry: electrochemical analysis of trace methamphetamine residues on household surfaces. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (5), 056514. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6c4f

  • 392

    Lee P. L. T. Kanodarwala F. K. Lennard C. Spindler X. Spikmans V. Roux C. et al (2022b). Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: investigation into novel application procedures. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)335, 111275. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111275

  • 393

    Lee T. Kim W. Park J. Lee G. (2022a). Hemolysis-Inspired, highly sensitive, label-free IgM detection using erythrocyte membrane-functionalized nanomechanical resonators. MATERIALS.15 (21), 7738. 10.3390/ma15217738

  • 394

    Lei Y. A. Zhang Y. H. Yuan L. Li J. K. (2022). Biochar-supported Cu nanocluster as an electrochemical ultrasensitive interface for ractopamine sensing. FOOD CHEMISTRY-X15, 100404. 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100404

  • 395

    Li C. Han D. F. Liang Z. S. Han F. J. Fu W. C. Wang W. et al (2022h). Novel electrochemical-surface plasmon resonance (EC-SPR) sensor for amphetamine-type stimulants detection based on molecularly imprinted strategy. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL369, 132258. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132258

  • 396

    Li C. Han D. F. Wu Z. F. Liang Z. S. Han F. J. Chen K. et al (2022). Polydopamine-based molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor for the highly selective determination of ecstasy components. ANALYST.147 (14), 32913297. 10.1039/d2an00351a

  • 397

    Li D. Lv P. Xiao-Wen H. Jia Z. Zheng M. Hai-Tao F. (2023b). A highly efficient fluorescent sensor based on AIEgen for detection of nitrophenolic explosives. Molecules28 (1), 181. 10.3390/molecules28010181

  • 398

    Li D. Zhou P. P. Hu Y. F. Li G. K. Xia L. (2022f). Rapid determination of illegally added Sudan I in cake by triphenylamine functionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane fluorescence sensor. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.282, 121673. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121673

  • 399

    Li G. L. Zhang X. L. Zheng F. P. Liu J. H. Wu D. (2020e). Emerging nanosensing technologies for the detection of β-agonists. Food Chem.332, 127431. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127431

  • 400

    Li H. D. Jia R. L. Wang Y. (2020c). p-Pyridine BODIPY-based fluorescence probe for highly sensitive and selective detection of picric acid. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.228, 117793. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117793

  • 401

    Li H. D. Zhang C. Y. Wang J. Chong H. Zhang T. Wang C. Y. (2021a). Pristine graphic carbon nitride quantum dots for the visualized detection of latent fingerprints. Anal. Sci.37 (11), 14971503. 10.2116/analsci.20p336

  • 402

    Li H. F. Chen J. Huang B. W. Kong L. W. Sun F. F. Li L. et al (2022e). A rapid fluorescence sensor for the direct quantification of rongalite in foodstuffs. FOODS11 (17), 2650. 10.3390/foods11172650

  • 403

    Li J. X. Chen X. Q. Zhu J. J. (2023a). DNA functionalized plasmonic nanoassemblies as SERS sensors for environmental analysis. AGGREGATE4 (2). 10.1002/agt2.271

  • 404

    Li L. Li Q. Chu J. G. Xi P. Wang C. H. Liu R. et al (2022a). Dual-mode luminescent multilayer core-shell UCNPs@SiO2@TEuTbB nanospheres for high-level anti-counterfeiting and recognition of latent fingerprints. Appl. Surf. Sci.581, 152395. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152395

  • 405

    Li L. Zhang M. Chen W. (2020f). Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric and electrochemical sensors for the detection of illegal food additives. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 642654. 10.38212/2224-6614.3114

  • 406

    Li L. Zhang M. M. Li R. Jiang H. Liu Z. D. (2021c). Facile synthesis of highly luminescent rod-like terbium-based metal-organic frameworks for sensitive detection of olaquindox. Anal. METHODS13 (34), 37853791. 10.1039/d1ay00824b

  • 407

    Li R. Meng C. Wen Y. Fu W. He P. (2019a). Fluorometric lateral flow immunoassay for simultaneous determination of three mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1, zearalenone and deoxynivalenol) using quantum dot microbeads. Microchim. Acta186 (12), 748749. 10.1007/s00604-019-3879-6

  • 408

    Li S. P. Zhou J. Y. Noroozifar M. Kerman K. (2021e). Gold-Platinum core-shell nanoparticles with thiolated polyaniline and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of six drug molecules. CHEMOSENSORS9 (2), 24. 10.3390/chemosensors9020024

  • 409

    Li W. Li X. Z. Yang T. Y. Guo X. J. Song Y. T. (2020). Detection of saliva morphine using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy combined with immunochromatographic assay. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.51 (4), 642648. 10.1002/jrs.5822

  • 410

    Li W. Luo Y. Yue X. Q. Wu J. R. Wu R. N. Qiao Y. et al (2020h). A novel microfluidic paper-based analytical device based on chemiluminescence for the determination of β-agonists in swine hair. Anal. METHODS12 (18), 23172322. 10.1039/c9ay02754h

  • 411

    Li W. Sun Y. Y. Chen W. L. Song G. F. Huang M. Y. Xu J. et al (2022g). Hollow RuCu bimetallic nanospheres as emerging SERS substrates for illegal food additives detection. Mater Lett.327, 133053. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133053

  • 412

    Li X. Jiao X. Y. Li H. Derakhshandeh M. (2021d). Amphetamine drug detection with inorganic MgO nanotube based on the DFT calculations. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.193 (11), 35283539. 10.1007/s12010-021-03633-6

  • 413

    Li X. Wu X. Wang J. Hua Q. Wu J. Shen X. et al (2019b). Three lateral flow immunochromatographic assays based on different nanoparticle probes for on-site detection of tylosin and tilmicosin in milk and pork. Sens. Actuators B Chem.301, 127059. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127059

  • 414

    Li X. L. Ma C. Q. Li L. Gao H. Gu J. Zhu C. et al (2021b). A lanthanide complex fluorescent probe for the detection of melamine. Appl. Spectrosc.75 (10), 13121319. 10.1177/00037028211022375

  • 415

    Li X. M. Li J. Y. Ling J. Wang C. D. Ding Y. J. Chang Y. F. et al (2020a). A smartphone-based bacteria sensor for rapid and portable identification of forensic saliva sample. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL320, 128303. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128303

  • 416

    Li X. Y. Sun L. Xu B. Dai L. H. Xiao Y. Ding Y. M. et al (2023c). MOF-gold core-satellite nanostructure based SERS platform for fentanyl detection in multiple complex samples. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL385, 133710. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133710

  • 417

    Li Y. Xu X. Liu L. Kuang H. Xu L. Xu C. (2020d). A gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of tetrodotoxin. Analyst145 (6), 21432151. 10.1039/d0an00170h

  • 418

    Li Y. G. Liu X. S. Zhang G. N. Wang R. H. Yue R. M. Liao G. F. et al (2022b). Rapid and selective on-site detection of triacetone triperoxide based on visual colorimetric method. J. Chem. Res.46 (4). 10.1177/17475198221117409

  • 419

    Li Y. J. (2020). Calorimetric sensor for ethanol using Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) resin immobilized alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). Curr. Anal. Chem.16 (6), 795799. 10.2174/1573411015666190617110233

  • 420

    Li Y. N. Liu X. X. Hou Y. Y. Wu Q. Hou J. J. (2022d). A higher affinity melamine binding aptamer mutant for more sensitive detection. ChemistrySelect7 (30). 10.1002/slct.202201427

  • 421

    Li Y. S. Zhou W. Y. Zu B. Y. Dou X. C. (2020b). Qualitative detection toward military and improvised explosive vapors by a facile TiO2 nanosheet-based chemiresistive sensor array. Front. Chem.8, 29. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00029

  • 422

    Li Y. T. Yang Y. Y. Sun Y. X. Cao Y. Huang Y. S. Han S. (2020g). Electrochemical fabrication of reduced MoS 2-based portable molecular imprinting nanoprobe for selective SERS determination of theophylline. Mikrochim. Acta187 (4), 203. 10.1007/s00604-020-4201-3

  • 423

    Li Y. Y. Peng D. (2022). Hydrophobic-binding-Driven and fluoresence-free development of aged fingerprints based on zinc oxide nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect7 (35). 10.1002/slct.202202252

  • 424

    Li Z. Xie H. Fu T. Li Y. Shen X. Li X. et al (2022c). Complementary strategy enhancing broad-specificity for multiplexed immunoassay of adulterant sulfonylureas in functional food. Biosens. (Basel).12 (8), 591. 10.3390/bios12080591

  • 425

    Lian J. Meng F. D. Wang W. Zhang Z. T. (2020b). Recent trends in fluorescent organic materials for latent fingerprint imaging. Front. Chem.8, 594864. 10.3389/fchem.2020.594864

  • 426

    Lian J. Xu Q. Wang Y. P. Meng F. D. (2020a). Recent developments in fluorescent materials for heavy metal ions analysis from the perspective of forensic chemistry. Front. Chem.8, 593291. 10.3389/fchem.2020.593291

  • 427

    Liang H. Z. Liu Y. Q. Qileng A. Shen H. R. Liu W. P. Xu Z. L. et al (2023). PEI-coated Prussian blue nanocubes as pH-Switchable nanozyme: broad-pH-responsive immunoassay for illegal additive. Biosens. Bioelectron.219, 114797. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114797

  • 428

    Liang M. Ren Y. Zhou Z. Li C. Wang C. Fu S. (2020). Monodisperse silica nanoparticle suspension for developing latent blood fingermarks. Forensic Sci. Res.5 (1), 3846. 10.1080/20961790.2018.1446721

  • 429

    Liao L. C. Xing Y. Xiong X. L. Gan L. Hu L. Zhao F. et al (2020). An electrochemical biosensor for hypoxanthine detection in vitreous humor: a potential tool for estimating the post-mortem interval in forensic cases. Microchem. J.155, 104760. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104760

  • 430

    Liao X. F. Chen C. J. Shi P. P. Yue L. Z. (2021). Determination of melamine in milk based on β-cyclodextrin modified carbon nanoparticles via host-guest recognition. Food Chem.338, 127769. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127769

  • 431

    Liberatore N. Viola R. Mengali S. Masini L. Zardi F. Elmi I. et al (2023). Compact GC-QEPAS for on-site analysis of chemical threats. SENSORS23 (1), 270. 10.3390/s23010270

  • 432

    Lima C. D. Couto R. A. S. Arantes L. C. Marinho P. A. Pimentel D. M. Quinaz M. B. et al (2020). Electrochemical detection of the synthetic cathinone 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone using carbon screen-printed electrodes: a fast, simple and sensitive screening method for forensic samples. Electrochim Acta354, 136728. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136728

  • 433

    Lin C. H. Dhenadhayalan N. Lin K. C. (2022). Emergent carbonized polymer dots as versatile featured nanomaterial for latent fingerprints, colorimetric sensor, and photocatalysis applications. Mater Today Nano20, 100246. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100246

  • 434

    Lin H. Cheng X. Yin M. J. Bao Z. Z. Wei X. B. Gu B. B. (2020). Flexible porphyrin doped polymer optical fibers for rapid and remote detection of trace DNT vapor. ANALYST.145 (15), 53075313. 10.1039/d0an00706d

  • 435

    Lin H. Y. Chen W. R. Lu L. C. Chen H. L. Chen Y. H. Pan M. et al (2023b). Direct thermal growth of gold nanopearls on 3D interweaved hydrophobic fibers as ultrasensitive portable SERS substrates for clinical applications. SMALL19 (28), e2207404. 10.1002/smll.202207404

  • 436

    Lin Y. Chen X. S. Li Y. Y. Ye Y. Yang L. Liao L. C. et al (2023a). Scandium-mediated photosensitization oxidation: a new strategy for fast and neutral pH colorimetric detection of cocaine by coupling split aptamer. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL380, 133349. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133349

  • 437

    Lin Y. Sun J. F. Tang M. Zhang G. H. Yu L. Zhao X. B. et al (2021). Synergistic recognition-triggered charge transfer enables rapid visual colorimetric detection of fentanyl. Anal. Chem.93 (16), 65446550. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00723

  • 438

    Ling J. Zhang W. Q. Cheng Z. J. Ding Y. J. (2022). High-sensitivity detection for cantharidin by ratiometric fluorescent sensor based on molecularly imprinted nanoparticles of quantum dots. J. INDUSTRIAL Eng. Chem.112, 358365. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.05.033

  • 439

    Liu B. Zheng S. Y. Li H. T. Xu J. J. Tang H. Y. Wang Y. et al (2022d). Ultrasensitive and facile detection of multiple trace antibiotics with magnetic nanoparticles and core-shell nanostar SERS nanotags. Talanta237, 122955. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122955

  • 440

    Liu H. Y. You Y. H. Zhu Y. Z. Zheng H. (2021). Recent advances in the exonuclease III-assisted target signal amplification strategy for nucleic acid detection. Anal. METHODS13 (43), 51035119. 10.1039/d1ay01275d

  • 441

    Liu J. J. Niu X. H. (2022). Rational design of nanozymes enables advanced biochemical sensing. CHEMOSENSORS10 (10), 386. 10.3390/chemosensors10100386

  • 442

    Liu L. Chen H. Y. Tian L. Sun X. Y. Zhang M. Q. (2023b). Physical visualization and squalene-based scanning electrochemical microscopy imaging of latent fingerprints on PVDF membrane. ANALYST148 (5), 10321040. 10.1039/d2an01940j

  • 443

    Liu M. M. Ma B. A. Wang Y. P. Chen E. J. Li J. L. Zhang M. Z. (2022e). Research on rapid detection technology for β2-agonists: multi-residue fluorescence immunochromatography based on dimeric artificial antigen. FOODS11 (6), 863. 10.3390/foods11060863

  • 444

    Liu S. Gao C. Tong Z. Y. Mu X. H. Liu B. Xu J. J. et al (2022c). A highly sensitive electrochemiluminescence method for abrin detection by a portable biosensor based on a screen-printed electrode with a phage display affibody as specific labeled probe. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (2), 10951104. 10.1007/s00216-021-03735-4

  • 445

    Liu W. Song Z. Zhao Y. Liu Y. He X. Methods S. C. A. et al (2020a). Flexible porous aerogels decorated with Ag nanoparticles as an effective SERS substrate for label-free trace explosives detection. Anal. Methods12, 41234129. 10.1039/d0ay00771d

  • 446

    Liu W. Wang X. Zhao Z. Y. Zhou X. Huang S. L. Huang L. J. et al (2022b). Tailored SiO2-TiO2 aerogel/Ag flexible films as stable SERS substrates for hazardous materials detection. Adv. Mater Technol.7 (6). 10.1002/admt.202101169

  • 447

    Liu X. Choi E. G. Cui S. Kumar K. Cho M. Chang Y. T. (2022a). Casting red light for bad oil by dual turning-on mechanisms of fluorescence and its application in the portable platform. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL365, 131866. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131866

  • 448

    Liu X. F. Deng J. X. Li J. W. Dong J. B. Liu H. Zhao J. S. et al (2023a). B-doped graphene quantum dots array as fluorescent sensor platforms for plasticizers detection. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL376, 132989. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132989

  • 449

    Liu Y. J. Zhang L. Y. (2020). The development of latent fingermarks for visualization by using aunps@auncs core/shell nanoparticles. Nano15 (10), 2050132. 10.1142/s1793292020501325

  • 450

    Liu Y. Z. Yu H. X. Alkhamis O. Moliver J. Xiao Y. (2020b). Tuning biosensor cross-reactivity using aptamer mixtures. Anal. Chem.92 (7), 50415047. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05339

  • 451

    Liyanage T. Masterson A. N. Hati S. Ren G. Manicke N. E. Rusyniak D. E. et al (2020). Optimization of electromagnetic hot spots in surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates for an ultrasensitive drug assay of emergency department patients’ plasma. ANALYST145 (23), 76627672. 10.1039/d0an01372b

  • 452

    Locard E. (1920). L’Enqueˆte criminelle et les Methodes scientifiques. Paris: E. Flammarion.

  • 453

    Loch A. S. Burn P. L. Shaw P. E. (2023). Fluorescent sensors for the detection of free-base illicit drugs-Effect of tuning the electronic properties. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL387, 133766. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133766

  • 454

  • 455

    Loredana M. Alina A. Dragomir I. S. Bucataru I. C. Jonggwan P. Ho S. C. et al (2020). Sequence-specific detection of single-stranded DNA with a gold nanoparticle-protein nanopore approach. Sci. Rep. Nat. Publ. Group.10 (1), 11323. 10.1038/s41598-020-68258-x

  • 456

    Lu L. X. Xu L. X. Zhang Y. L. Jiang T. (2022). Multiplexed surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of melamine and dicyandiamide in dairy food enabled by three-dimensional polystyrene@silver@graphene oxide hybrid substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci.603, 154419. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154419

  • 457

    Lu R. Q. Qi Z. K. Wang S. Y. Tian X. G. Xu X. Y. (2021). Rapid detection of illegal biguanides in hypoglycemic health products using molecular imprinting combined with SERS technology. Microchem. J.169, 106523. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106523

  • 458

    Luo H. Z. Liu S. Shi L. N. Li Z. Bai Q. W. Du X. X. et al (2022). Paper-based fluidic sensing platforms for β-adrenergic agonist residue point-of-care testing. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (7), 518. 10.3390/bios12070518

  • 459

    Ma B. Wang X. F. Gao S. Qi L. H. Xu Y. Yang J. X. et al (2020). Iridium(Ⅲ) complex-based phosphorescent probe for rapid, specific, and sensitive detection of phosgene. DYES PIGMENTS.177, 108279. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108279

  • 460

    Maashi M. S. (2023). CRISPR/Cas-based aptasensor as an innovative sensing approaches for food safety analysis: recent progresses and new horizons. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 25992617. 10.1080/10408347.2023.2188955

  • 461

    Machado T. R. da Silva J. S. Miranda R. R. Zucolotto V. Li M. S. de Yuso M. V. M. et al (2022). Amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles allow fingerprint detection via self-activated luminescence. Chem. Eng. J.443, 136443. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136443

  • 462

    Madani-Nejad E. Shokrollahi A. Shahdost-Fard F. (2023). A smartphone-based colorimetric assay using Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles as the nanoprobes for visual tracing of fluvoxamine in biofluids as a common suicide drug. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc., 296. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122665

  • 463

    Mahmudiono T. Bokov D. O. Jasim S. A. Abdelbasset W. K. Khashirbaeva D. M. (2022). State-of-the-art of convenient and low-cost electrochemical sensor for food contamination detection: technical and analytical overview. Microchem. J.179, 107460. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107460

  • 464

    Malahom N. Jarujamrus P. Anutrasakda W. Chawengkirttikul R. Siripinyanond A. Meelapsom R. et al (2020). Novel paper-based colorimetric immunoassay (PCI) for sensitive and specific detection of salbutamol residues in flesh of swine and urine using Ag3PO4/Ag nanocomposite as label. J. Food Sci.85 (1), 209219. 10.1111/1750-3841.14974

  • 465

    Malik A. H. Zehra N. Ahmad M. Parui R. Iyer P. K. (2020). Advances in conjugated polymers for visualization of latent fingerprints: a critical perspective. NEW J. Chem.44 (45), 1942319439. 10.1039/d0nj04131a

  • 466

    Mandal P. Tewari B. S. (2022). Progress in surface enhanced Raman scattering molecular sensing: a review. SURFACES INTERFACES28, 101655. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101655

  • 467

    Mani V. Beduk T. Khushaim W. Ceylan A. E. Timur S. Wolfbeis O. S. et al (2021). Electrochemical sensors targeting salivary biomarkers: a comprehensive review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.135, 116164. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116164

  • 468

    Mansouri M. Khalilzadeh B. Barzegari A. Shoeibi S. Isildak S. Bargahi N. et al (2020). Design a highly specific sequence for electrochemical evaluation of meat adulteration in cooked sausages. Biosens. Bioelectron.150, 111916. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111916

  • 469

    Mao G. Liu C. Yang N. Yang L. He G. (2021b). Design and synthesis of a fluorescent probe based on copper complex for selective detection of hydrogen sulfide. J. Sens.2021. 10.1155/2021/8822558

  • 470

    Mao J. K. Kang Y. L. Yu D. D. Zhou J. G. (2021d). Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy integrated with aligner mediated cleavage strategy for ultrasensitive and selective detection of methamphetamine. Anal. Chim. Acta.1146, 124130. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.12.028

  • 471

    Mao K. Yang Z. G. Zhang H. Li X. Q. Cooper J. M. (2021c). Paper-based nanosensors to evaluate community-wide illicit drug use for wastewater-based epidemiology. Water Res.189, 116559. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116559

  • 472

    Mao K. Zhang H. Pan Y. W. Yang Z. G. (2021a). Biosensors for wastewater-based epidemiology for monitoring public health. Water Res.191, 116787. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116787

  • 473

    Mao K. Zhang H. Pan Y. W. Zhang K. K. Cao H. R. Li X. Q. et al (2020). Nanomaterial-based aptamer sensors for analysis of illicit drugs and evaluation of drugs consumption for wastewater-based epidemiology. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.130, 115975. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115975

  • 474

    Mao S. H. Pei F. B. Feng S. S. Hao Q. L. Zhang P. J. Tong Z. Y. et al (2023). Detection of trace Rhodamine B using stable, uniformity, and reusable SERS substrate based on Ag@SiO2-Au nanoparticles. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS657, 130595. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130595

  • 475

    María-Hormigos R. Molinero-Fernández Á. López M. Á. Jurado-Sánchez B. Escarpa A. (2022). Prussian blue/chitosan micromotors with intrinsic enzyme-like activity for (bio)-Sensing assays. Anal. Chem.94 (14), 55755582. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05173

  • 476

    Marques L. Félix L. Cruz G. Coelho V. Caetano J. Vale A. et al (2023). Neutron and gamma-ray detection system coupled to a multirotor for screening of shipping container cargo. Sensors23 (1), 329. 10.3390/s23010329

  • 477

    Masemola D. P. Mafa P. J. Nyoni H. Mamba B. B. Msagati T. A. M. (2020). Gold nanoparticles modified exfoliated graphite electrode as electrochemical sensor in the determination of psychoactive drug. J. Environ. Sci. HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD Contam. Agric. WASTES55 (5), 455461. 10.1080/03601234.2020.1713670

  • 478

    Mayer B. P. Kennedy D. J. Lau E. Y. Valdez C. A. (2023). Evaluation of polyanionic cyclodextrins as high affinity binding scaffolds for fentanyl. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 2680. 10.1038/s41598-023-29662-1

  • 479

    McGoldrick L. K. Halámek J. (2020). Recent advances in noninvasive biosensors for forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. Sensors20 (21), 5974. 10.3390/s20215974

  • 480

    McKeever C. Callan S. Warren S. Dempsey E. (2022). Magnetic nanoparticle modified electrodes for voltammetric determination of propellant stabiliser diphenylamine. Talanta238, 123039. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123039

  • 481

    Medyantseva E. P. Gazizullina E. R. Brusnitsyn D. V. Fedorenko S. V. Mustafina A. R. Eremin S. A. (2022). Determination of amitriptyline by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. J. Anal. Chem.77 (9), 11471154. 10.1134/s1061934822070085

  • 482

    Mégarbane B. Oberlin M. Alvarez J. C. Balen F. Beaune S. Bédry R. et al (2020). Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ann. Intensive Care10 (1), 157230. 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9

  • 483

    Mei L. Shi Y. M. Shi Y. E. Yan P. P. Lin C. L. Sun Y. et al (2022). Multivalent SnO2 quantum dot-decorated Ti3C2 MXene for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of Sudan I in food. ANALYST.147 (23), 55575563. 10.1039/d2an01432g

  • 484

    Meir R. Zverzhinetsky M. Harpak N. Borberg E. Burstein L. Zeiri O. et al (2020). Direct detection of uranyl in urine by dissociation from aptamer-modified nanosensor arrays. Anal. Chem.92 (18), 1252812537. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02387

  • 485

    Melman Y. Wells P. K. Katz E. Smutok O. (2022). A universal nanostructured bioanalytical platform for NAD+-dependent enzymes based on the fluorescent output reading with a smartphone. Talanta243, 123325. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123325

  • 486

    Mengjun H. Peng D. (2021). A rapid and dual-mode visualization of latent and bloody fingermarks using Cr- and Sb-codoped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Mater Sci.56 (9), 55435554. 10.1007/s10853-020-05651-x

  • 487

    Merck (2025). Water, food and environmental analytics catalog. Anal. and Sample Prep. Available online at: https://www.merckmillipore.com/GB/en/20170308_183420.

  • 488

    Mereuta L. Asandei A. Dragomir I. Park J. Park Y. Luchian T. (2022). A nanopore sensor for multiplexed detection of short polynucleotides based on length-variable, poly-arginine-conjugated peptide nucleic acids. Anal. Chem.94 (24), 87748782. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01587

  • 489

    META (2016). “Megatrends affecting science, technology and innovation,” in OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2016.

  • 490

    Methley A. M. Campbell S. Chew-Graham C. McNally R. Cheraghi-Sohi S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv. Res.14, 579. 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

  • 491

    Ministry of Justice (2023). Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: december 2022 - GOV. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022.

  • 492

    Mishra S. Rani S. Ray S. J. (2020). Single electron transistor based nanosensor for DNA and RNA detection. J. Appl. Phys.128 (19). 10.1063/5.0016104

  • 493

    Mitri F. De Iacovo A. De Santis S. Sotgiu G. Colace L. (2022). “Quantum dots for explosive detection in air-two complimentary approaches,” in Prime 2022 - 17th international conference on PhD research in microelectronics and electronics, proceedings, 5356.

  • 494

    Mittal S. Laishram K. Inamdar S. Das N. R. Razdan A. K. (2020). Narcotic drug detection and identification through synchronous fluorescence technique. Def. Sci. J.70 (5), 534537. 10.14429/dsj.70.16338

  • 495

    Mobileidworld (2013). Cross match introduces new SEEK avenger handheld. Available online at: https://mobileidworld.com/archive/cross-match-introduces-new-seek-avenger-handheld/.

  • 496

    Mohamad N. R. Buang N. A. Mahat N. A. Jamalis J. Huyop F. Aboul-Enein H. Y. et al (2015). Simple adsorption of Candida rugosa lipase onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes for sustainable production of the flavor ester geranyl propionate. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.32, 99108. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.001

  • 497

    Mohan J. M. Amreen K. Kulkarni M. B. Javed A. Dubey S. K. Goel S. (2021). Optimized ink jetted paper device for electroanalytical detection of picric acid. COLLOIDS SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES208, 112056. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112056

  • 498

    Molinara M. Bourelly C. Ferrigno L. Gerevini L. Vitelli M. Ria A. et al (2022). “A new dataset for detection of illegal or suspicious spilling in wastewater through low-cost real-time sensors,” in Proceedings - 2022 IEEE international conference on smart computing (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)), 293298.

  • 499

    Monago-Maraña O. Eskildsen C. E. de la Peña A. M. Galeano-Díaz T. Wold J. P. (2020). Non-destructive fluorescence spectroscopy combined with second-order calibration as a new strategy for the analysis of the illegal Sudan I dye in paprika powder. Microchem. J.154, 104539. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104539

  • 500

    Montali L. Calabretta M. M. Lopreside A. D’Elia M. Guardigli M. Michelini E. (2020). Multienzyme chemiluminescent foldable biosensor for on-site detection of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Biosens. Bioelectron.162, 112232. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112232

  • 501

    Moon D. Cha Y. K. Kim S. O. Cho S. Ko H. J. Park T. H. (2020). FET-based nanobiosensors for the detection of smell and taste. Sci. CHINA-LIFE Sci.63 (8), 11591167. 10.1007/s11427-019-1571-8

  • 502

    Moradi R. Khalili N. P. Septiani N. W. Liu C. H. Doustkhah E. Yamauchi Y. et al (2022). Nanoarchitectonics for abused-drug biosensors. SMALL18 (10), e2104847. 10.1002/smll.202104847

  • 503

    Morita I. Kiguchi Y. Oyama H. Yamaki K. Sakio N. Kashiwabara K. et al (2022). Derivatization-assisted immunoassays: application for group-specific detection of potent methamphetamine and amphetamine enantiomers. Anal. METHODS14 (28), 27452753. 10.1039/d2ay00940d

  • 504

    Mostafa I. M. Meng C. D. Dong Z. X. Lou B. H. Xu G. B. (2022). Potentiometric sensors for the determination of pharmaceutical drugs. Anal. Sci.38 (1), 2337. 10.2116/analsci.21sar02

  • 505

    Mousaabadi K. Z. Ensafi A. A. Rezaei B. (2022). Simultaneous determination of some opioid drugs using Cu-hemin MOF@MWCNTs as an electrochemical sensor. Chemosphere303, 135149. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135149

  • 506

    Murahashi M. Makinodan M. Yui M. Hibi T. Kobayashi M. (2020). Immunochromatographic detection of human hemoglobin from deteriorated bloodstains due to methamphetamine contamination, aging, and heating. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (23), 57995809. 10.1007/s00216-020-02802-6

  • 507

    Musile G. Agard Y. Wang L. De Palo E. F. McCord B. Tagliaro F. (2021). Paper-based microfluidic devices: on-site tools for crime scene investigation. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.143, 116406. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116406

  • 508

    Mustafa F. Carhart M. Andreescu S. (2021). A 3D-printed breath analyzer incorporating CeO2 nanoparticles for colorimetric enzyme-based ethanol sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater4 (9), 93619369. 10.1021/acsanm.1c01826

  • 509

    Mutz Y. S. do Rosario D. Silva L. R. G. Galvan D. Janegitz B. C. Ferreira R. D. et al (2022). A single screen-printed electrode in tandem with chemometric tools for the forensic differentiation of Brazilian beers. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 5630. 10.1038/s41598-022-09632-9

  • 510

    Myadam N. L. Nadargi D. Y. Nadargi J. D. Kudkyal V. R. Shaikh F. I. Mulla I. S. et al (2021). Ni/SnO2 xerogels via epoxide chemistry: potential candidate for H2S gas sensing application. J. Porous Mater.28 (1), 239248. 10.1007/s10934-020-00970-5

  • 511

    Na G. Q. Hu X. F. Sun Y. N. Kwee S. Xing G. X. Xing Y. R. et al (2020). A highly sensitive monoclonal antibody-based paper sensor for simultaneously detecting valnemulin and tiamulin in porcine liver. J. Food Sci.85 (6), 16811688. 10.1111/1750-3841.15136

  • 512

    Nadar S. S. Kelkar R. K. Pise P. V. Patil N. P. Patil S. P. Chaubal-Durve N. S. et al (2021). The untapped potential of magnetic nanoparticles for forensic investigations: a comprehensive review. Talanta230, 122297. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122297

  • 513

    Nagabooshanam S. Sharma S. Roy S. Mathur A. Krishnamurthy S. Bharadwaj L. M. (2021). Development of field deployable sensor for detection of pesticide from food chain. IEEE Sens. J.21 (4), 41294134. 10.1109/jsen.2020.3030034

  • 514

    Naik V. M. Gunjal D. B. Gore A. H. Anbhule P. V. Sohn D. Bhosale S. V. et al (2020). Nitrogen-doped carbon dot threads as a “turn-off” fluorescent probe for permanganate ions and its hydrogel hybrid as a naked eye sensor for gold(III) ions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (12), 29933003. 10.1007/s00216-020-02550-7

  • 515

    Narasimhamurthy K. N. Darshan G. P. Sharma S. C. Premkumar H. B. Adarsha H. Nagabhushana H. (2021). Surface functionalized inorganic phosphor by grafting organic antenna for long term preservation of latent fingerprints and data-security applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci.600, 887897. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.029

  • 516

    Nardo F. Di Chiarello M. Cavalera S. Baggiani C. Anfossi L. (2021). Ten years of lateral flow immunoassay technique applications: trends, challenges and future perspectives. Sensors21 (15), 5185. 10.3390/s21155185

  • 517

    Naresh V. Lee N. (2021). A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors21 (4), 1109. 10.3390/s21041109

  • 518

    Navami D. Darshan G. P. Basavaraj R. B. Sharma S. C. Kavyashree D. Venkatachalaiah K. N. et al (2020). Shape controllable ultrasound assisted fabrication of CaZrO3:Dy3+ hierarchical structures for display, dosimetry and advanced forensic applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY.389, 112248. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112248

  • 519

    Nayini M. M. R. Sayadian H. Razavipour N. Rezazade M. (2020). Chemical-sensing of Amphetamine drug by inorganic AlN nano-cage: a DFT/TDDFT study. Inorg. Chem. Commun.121, 108237. 10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108237

  • 520

    NCJRS Virtual Library (2001). Scientific working group on friction ridge analysis, study and technology. J. Forensic Identif.Available online at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/scientific-working-group-friction-ridge-analysis-study-and.

  • 521

    Neal R. D. Hughes R. A. Preston A. S. Golze S. D. Demille T. B. Neretina S. (2021). Substrate-immobilized noble metal nanoplates: a review of their synthesis, assembly, and application. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (38), 1297413012. 10.1039/d1tc01494c

  • 522

    Neng J. Wang Y. Z. Zhang Y. L. Chen P. Yang K. (2023). MIPs-SERS sensor based on Ag NPs film for selective detection of enrofloxacin in food. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.13 (3), 330. 10.3390/bios13030330

  • 523

    Neng J. Zhang Q. Sun P. L. (2020). Application of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in fast detection of toxic and harmful substances in food. Biosens. Bioelectron.167, 112480. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112480

  • 524

    Neurotechnology (2025). Cross match L SCAN guardian USB/FW fingerprint scanners. Available online at: https://neurotechnology.com/fingerprint-scanner-cross-match-l-scan-guardian.html.

  • 525

    Ngo H. T. Nguyen V. T. Tran D. M. Toan T. T. T. Triet N. T. M. Nguyen T. B. et al (2020). “Voltammetric determination of rhodamine B using a ZIF-67/reduced graphene oxide modified electrode,”. Editor LiuY., 2020, 114. 10.1155/2020/4679061

  • 526

    Nguyen Y. T. Shin S. Kwon K. Kim N. Bae S. W. (2023). BODIPY-based fluorescent sensors for detection of explosives. J. Chem. Res.47 (2). 10.1177/17475198231168961

  • 527

    Nie X. Dong K. Tian Y. Zong C. Chen Z. Wang X. et al (2023). A green analysis detection of formaldehyde in grooming products by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Mater. TODAY Sustain.22, 100303. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100303

  • 528

    NIST (2025). Fire debris and explosives. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available online at: https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/fire-debris-and-explosives.

  • 529

    Noh D. Ampadu E. K. Oh E. (2022). Influence of air flow on luminescence quenching in polymer films towards explosives detection using drones. Polym. (Basel)14 (3), 483. 10.3390/polym14030483

  • 530

    Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service Fire Investigation (FI) (2013). Service information system.

  • 531

    Novais A. D. Arantes L. C. Almeida E. S. Rocha R. G. Lima C. D. Melo L. M. D. et al (2022). Fast on-site screening of 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) in forensic samples using carbon screen-printed electrode and square wave voltammetry. Electrochim Acta403, 139599. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139599

  • 532

    Noviana E. McCord C. P. Clark K. M. Jang I. Henry C. S. (2019). Electrochemical paper-based devices: sensing approaches and progress toward practical applications. Lab. Chip20 (1), 934. 10.1039/c9lc00903e

  • 533

    NPCC (2025). Nearly 9,000 drivers caught drink or drug driving. Available online at: https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/nearly-9-000-drivers-caught-drink-or-drug-driving-in-six-week-police-operation.

  • 534

    NPSA (2025). Canine detection. Available online at: https://www.npsa.gov.uk/canine-detection-0.

  • 535

    Nsuamani M. L. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. Adegoke O. (2022). Thiolated gamma-cyclodextrin-polymer-functionalized CeFe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite as an intrinsic nanocatalyst for the selective and ultrasensitive colorimetric detection of triacetone triperoxide. Chemosphere307, 136108. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136108

  • 536

    Nugroho D. Chanthai S. Oh W. C. Benchawattananon R. (2023). Fluorophores-rich natural powder from selected medicinal plants for detection latent fingerprints and cyanide. Sci. Prog.106 (1), 368504231156217. 10.1177/00368504231156217

  • 537

    Nugroho D. Keawprom C. Chanthai S. Oh W. C. Benchawattananon R. (2022a). Highly sensitive fingerprint detection under UV light on non-porous surface using starch-powder based luminol-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) from tender coconut water as a green carbon source. NANOMATERIALS12 (3), 400. 10.3390/nano12030400

  • 538

    Nugroho D. Oh W. C. Chanthai S. Benchawattananon R. (2022b). Improving minutiae image of latent fingerprint detection on non-porous surface materials under UV light using sulfur doped carbon quantum dots from magnolia grandiflora flower. NANOMATERIALS12 (19), 3277. 10.3390/nano12193277

  • 539

    Nurazzi N. M. Harussani M. M. Zulaikha N. D. S. Norhana A. H. Syakir M. I. Norli A. (2021). Composites based on conductive polymer with carbon nanotubes in DMMP gas sensors - an overview. Polimery/Polymers66 (2), 8597. 10.14314/polimery.2021.2.1

  • 540

    Nurfarhana H. Tahir A. Mahat N. A. Hasmerya M. Keat H. F. (2022). Counterfeit fifty Ringgit Malaysian banknotes authentication using novel graph-based chemometrics method. Sci. Rep. Nat. Publ. Group.12 (1), 4826. 10.1038/s41598-022-08821-w

  • 541

    Office for National Statistics (2022). Crime in england and wales: year ending march 2022 - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-in-england-and-wales-year-ending-march-2022.

  • 542

    Official Statistics (2022). Drug misuse in england and wales: year ending june 2022 - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/drug-misuse-in-england-and-wales-year-ending-june-2022.

  • 543

    Official Statistics (2025). Crime outcomes in england and wales 2021 to 2022 - GOV. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022.

  • 544

    Olean-Oliveira A. Trevizan H. F. Cardoso C. X. Teixeira M. F. S. (2023). Impedimetric study of the electrocatalytic oxidation of alcohols by nickel-Schiff base metallopolymer: potential application for forensic identification of alcoholic beverage contaminants by multivariate data analysis. Talanta253, 124029. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124029

  • 545

    Olszowska I. Lesniewski A. Kelm A. Pieta I. S. Siejca A. Niedziólka-Jönsson J. (2020). Zinc oxide quantum dots embedded in hydrophobic silica particles for latent fingermarks visualization based on time-gated luminescence measurements. Methods Appl. Fluoresc.8 (2), 025001. 10.1088/2050-6120/ab6f24

  • 546

    Ondieki A. M. Birech Z. Kaduki K. A. Mwangi P. W. Mwenze N. M. Juma M. et al (2023). Fabrication of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates using silver nanoparticles produced by laser ablation in liquids. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.296, 122694. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122694

  • 547

    Ong V. Cortez N. R. Xu Z. R. Amirghasemi F. Abd El-Rahman M. K. Mousavi M. P. S. (2023). An accessible Yarn-based sensor for in-field detection of Succinylcholine poisoning. CHEMOSENSORS11 (3), 175. 10.3390/chemosensors11030175

  • 548

    Ortiz-Aguayo D. Cetó X. De Wael K. del Valle M. (2022). Resolution of opiate illicit drugs signals in the presence of some cutting agents with use of a voltammetric sensor array and machine learning strategies. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL357, 131345. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131345

  • 549

    Ott C. E. Cunha-Silva H. Kuberski S. L. Cox J. A. Arcos-Martínez M. J. Arroyo-Mora L. E. (2020). Electrochemical detection of fentanyl with screen-printed carbon electrodes using square-wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry for forensic applications. J. Electroanal. Chem.873, 114425. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114425

  • 550

    Ouyang S. Y. Yu S. T. Le Y. Y. (2022). Current advances in immunoassays for the detection of β2-agonists. FOODS11 (6), 803. 10.3390/foods11060803

  • 551

    Özgür E. Saylan Y. Bereli N. Türkmen D. Denizli A. (2020). Molecularly imprinted polymer integrated plasmonic nanosensor for cocaine detection. J. BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER Ed.31 (9), 12111222. 10.1080/09205063.2020.1751524

  • 552

    Pal A. Kaswan K. Barman S. R. Lin Y. Z. Chung J. H. Sharma M. K. et al (2023). Microfluidic nanodevices for drug sensing and screening applications. Biosens. Bioelectron.219, 114783. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114783

  • 553

    Pan M. Ma T. Yang J. Li S. Liu S. Wang S. (2020). Development of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays using colloidal Au Sphere and nanorods as signal marker for the determination of zearalenone in Cereals. Foods9 (3), 281. 10.3390/foods9030281

  • 554

    Pan Y. C. Liu X. Liu J. Wang J. P. Liu J. X. Gao Y. X. et al (2022). Chemiluminescence sensors based on molecularly imprinted polymers for the determination of organophosphorus in milk. J. Dairy Sci.105 (4), 30193031. 10.3168/jds.2021-21213

  • 555

    Papadopoulos F. Diamanteas K. Economou A. Kokkinos C. (2020). Rapid drop-volume electrochemical detection of the “date rape” drug flunitrazepam in Spirits using a screen-printed sensor in a Dry-reagent format. Sensors20 (18), 5192. 10.3390/s20185192

  • 556

    Papaioannou G. C. Karastogianni S. Girousi S. (2022). Development of an electrochemical sensor using a modified carbon paste electrode with silver nanoparticles capped with saffron for monitoring mephedrone. SENSORS22 (4), 1625. 10.3390/s22041625

  • 557

    Pappalardo A. Gangemi C. M. A. Toscano R. M. Sfrazzetto G. T. (2020). A new fluorescent salen-uranyl sensor for the sub-ppm detection of chemical warfare agents. Curr. Org. Chem.24 (20), 23782382. 10.2174/1385272824999200930150313

  • 558

    Paprocki S. Qassem M. Kyriacou P. A. (2022). Review of ethanol intoxication sensing technologies and techniques. SENSORS22 (18), 6819. 10.3390/s22186819

  • 559

    Parkhey P. Mohan S. V. (2018). “Biosensing applications of microbial fuel cell: approach toward miniaturization,” in Microbial electrochemical technology (Elsevier), 977997.

  • 560

    Parrilla M. Joosten F. De Wael K. (2021). Enhanced electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in oral fluid by the use of surfactant-mediated solution. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL348, 130659. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130659

  • 561

    Parrilla M. Slosse A. Van Echelpoel R. Montiel N. F. Langley A. R. Van Durme F. et al (2022). Rapid on-site detection of illicit drugs in smuggled samples with a portable electrochemical device. CHEMOSENSORS10 (3), 108. 10.3390/chemosensors10030108

  • 562

    Parungao D. Vandenabeele P. Edwards H. G. M. Candeias A. Miguel C. (2022). Mobile Raman spectroscopy analysis of elephant ivory objects. J. Raman Spectrosc.54, 12971302. 10.1002/jrs.6487

  • 563

    Paschoarelli M. V. V. Kavai M. S. de Lima L. F. de Araujo W. R. (2023). Laser-scribing fabrication of a disposable electrochemical device for forensic detection of crime facilitating drugs in beverage samples. Talanta255, 124214. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124214

  • 564

    Patil G. Dongre S. D. Das T. Babu S. S. (2020). Dual mode selective detection and differentiation of TNT from other nitroaromatic compounds. J. Mater Chem. A Mater8 (21), 1076710771. 10.1039/d0ta02091e

  • 565

    Patiti C. Sfragano P. S. Laschi S. Pillozzi S. Boddi A. Crociani O. et al (2022). Chip-based and wearable tools for isothermal amplification and electrochemical analysis of nucleic acids. CHEMOSENSORS10 (7), 278. 10.3390/chemosensors10070278

  • 566

    Pattarith K. Benchawattananon R. (2020). The novel photoluminescence powder synthesized from zinc carbonate nanoparticles associated with fluorescein dye for its latent fingerprint detection. Orient. J. Chem.36 (2), 237243. 10.13005/ojc/360204

  • 567

    Paul M. Tannenberg R. Tscheuschner G. Ponader M. Weller M. G. (2021). Cocaine detection by a laser-induced immunofluorometric biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (9), 313. 10.3390/bios11090313

  • 568

    Paul M. Tscheuschner G. Herrmann S. Weller M. G. (2020). Fast detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) at ppt level by a laser-induced immunofluorometric biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.10 (8), 89. 10.3390/bios10080089

  • 569

    Pavitra E. Raju G. S. R. Park J. Y. Hussain S. K. Chodankar N. R. Rao G. M. et al (2020). An efficient far-red emitting Ba2LaNbO6:Mn4+ nanophosphor for forensic latent fingerprint detection and horticulture lighting applications. Ceram. Int.46 (7), 98029809. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.253

  • 570

    Paxton N. Smolan W. Böck T. Mary F. B. Sophia Ponraj J. Dhanabalan B. et al (2021). Forensic analysis on printer inks via chemometrics. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater Sci. Eng.1192 (1), 012029. 10.1088/1757-899X/1192/1/012029

  • 571

    Peltomaa R. Barderas R. Benito-Peña E. Moreno-Bondi M. C. (2022). Recombinant antibodies and their use for food immunoanalysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (1), 193217. 10.1007/s00216-021-03619-7

  • 572

    Pena-Pereira F. Bendicho C. Pavlović D. M. Martín-Esteban A. Díaz-Álvarez M. Pan Y. et al (2021). Miniaturized analytical methods for determination of environmental contaminants of emerging concern – a review. Anal. Chim. Acta.1158, 238108. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.040

  • 573

    Peng D. He S. A. Zhang Y. Y. Yao L. Q. Nie W. D. Liao Z. J. et al (2022). Blue light-induced rare-earth free phosphors for the highly sensitive and selective imaging of latent fingerprints based on enhanced hydrophobic interaction. J. MATERIOMICS8 (1), 229238. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.03.005

  • 574

    Peng D. Zhao Z. H. (2023). Highly efficient ferric ion sensing and high resolution latent fingerprint imaging based on fluorescent silicon quantum dots. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.299, 122827. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122827

  • 575

    Peng D. P. Kavanagh O. Gao H. J. Zhang X. Y. Deng S. J. Chen D. M. et al (2020). Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the determination of 3-methyl-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid, the marker residue of olaquindox, in swine tissues. Food Chem.302, 124623. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.022

  • 576

    Pereira de Oliveira L. Rocha D. P. Reis de Araujo W. Munoz R. A. A. Paixao TRLC Salles M. O. (2018). Forensics in hand: new trends in forensic devices (2013–2017). Anal. Methods10 (43), 51355163. 10.1039/c8ay01389f

  • 577

    PerkinElmer (2025). “Spectrum two N FT-NIR spectrometer,”. Waltham, MA: PerkinElmer, Inc. Available online at: https://www.perkinelmer.com/uk/product/spectrum-two-n-ft-nir-sp10-l1390021.

  • 578

    Pholsiri T. Khamcharoen W. Vimolmangkang S. Siangproh W. Chailapakul O. (2023). Paper-based electrochemical sensor for simultaneous detection of salivary Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and thiocyanate to differentiate illegal cannabis smokers. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL383, 133571. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133571

  • 579

    Picone A. L. Védova C. O. D. Romano R. M. (2020). Study on the detection of cocaine in Argentinian banknotes by SERS. Vib. Spectrosc.110, 103136. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2020.103136

  • 580

    Pierpaoli M. Lewkowicz A. Dee B. Nadolska M. Bogdanowicz R. (2022). Impedimetric sensing of α-amino acids driven by micro-patterned 1,8-Diazafluoren-9-one into titania-boron- doped maze-like nanocarbons. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL371, 132459. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132459

  • 581

    Pinto A. H. Nogueira A. E. Dalmaschio C. J. Frigini I. N. de Almeida J. C. Ferrer M. M. et al (2022). Doped tin dioxide (d-SnO2) and its nanostructures: review of the theoretical aspects, photocatalytic and biomedical applications. Solids3 (2), 327360. 10.3390/solids3020024

  • 582

    Pliatsikas N. Kalfagiannis N. Arvanitidis J. Christofilos D. Koutsogeorgis D. C. Kagkoura A. et al (2021). Edge-engineered self-assembled hierarchical plasmonic SERS templates. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv.6, 100186. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100186

  • 583

    Pogăcean F. Varodi C. Măgeruşan L. Staden R. I. S. van Pruneanu S. (2022). Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of azithromycin with graphene-modified electrode. Sensors22 (16), 6181. 10.3390/s22166181

  • 584

    Pohanka M. (2022). Electrochemical hand-held biosensors for biological warfare agents assay. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (9), 220961. 10.20964/2022.09.58

  • 585

    Pöhlmann C. Elßner T. (2020). Multiplex immunoassay techniques for on-site detection of security sensitive toxins. Toxins (Basel).12 (11), 727. 10.3390/toxins12110727

  • 586

    Police Law Enforcement Solutions (2018). Deployment strategies for handheld thermal imagers | police magazine. Available online at: https://www.policemag.com/technology/article/15346300/flir-systems-deployment-strategies-for-handheld-thermal-imagers.

  • 587

    Pollock S. Crick D. R. Winter L. J. Kemp M. C. (2021). Multi-sensor threat detection for screening people and their carried bags. Available online at: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11749/1174908/Multi-sensor-threat-detection-for-screening-people-and-their-carried/10.1117/12.2585744.full.10.1117/12.2585744

  • 588

    Pospisilová E. Paskanová N. Kuchar M. Shishkanova T. V. (2023). Potentiometric determination of mephedrone in oral fluids with ion-selective membranes. Electroanalysis35 (6). 10.1002/elan.202200468

  • 589

    Poulladofonou G. Freris C. Economou A. Kokkinos C. (2022). Wearable electronic finger for date rape drugs screening: from “do-it-yourself” fabrication to self-testing. Anal. Chem.94 (9), 40874094. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00015

  • 590

    Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2020a). Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent Europium (III) complex based on D-dextrose composite for latent fingerprint detection. J. SAUDI Chem. Soc.24 (8), 584605. 10.1016/j.jscs.2020.06.002

  • 591

    Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2020b). Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent N-CDs/ZnONPs nanocomposite for latent fingerprint detection by using powder brushing method. ARABIAN J. Chem.13 (2), 38173835. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.01.004

  • 592

    Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2021). Nanomaterials for latent fingerprint detection: a review. J. Mater. Res. TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T12, 18561885. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.110

  • 593

    Pragya S. V. Rangan K. Khungar B. (2022). A pyrazinium-based fluorescent chemosensor for the selective detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol in an aqueous medium. NEW J. Chem.46 (35), 1690716913. 10.1039/d2nj02999e

  • 594

    Pramanik S. Mukherjee S. Dey S. Mukherjee S. Das S. Ghosh T. et al (2022). Cooperative effects of zinc interstitials and oxygen vacancies on violet-bluep hotoluminescence of ZnO nanoparticles: UV radiation induced enhanced latent fingerprint detection. J. Lumin251, 119156. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119156

  • 595

    Prasad V. Lukose S. Agarwal P. Prasad L. (2020). Role of nanomaterials for forensic investigation and latent fingerprinting—a review. J. Forensic Sci.65, 2636. 10.1111/1556-4029.14172

  • 596

    Prasad V. Prasad L. Lukose S. Agarwal P. (2021). Latent fingerprint development by using silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate-A comparative study. J. Forensic Sci.66 (3), 10651074. 10.1111/1556-4029.14664

  • 597

    Praveen V. K. Vedhanarayanan B. Mal A. Mishra R. K. Ajayaghosh A. (2020). Self-Assembled extended π-systems for sensing and security applications. Acc. Chem. Res.53 (2), 496507. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00580

  • 598

    Press Release (2018). Police trial new Home Office mobile fingerprint technology. London, United Kingdom: UK Home Office. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/police-trial-new-home-office-mobile-fingerprint-technology.

  • 599

    Prlainović N. Ž. Bezbradica D. I. Knežević-Jugović Z. D. Stevanović S. I. Avramov Ivić M. L. Uskoković P. S. et al (2013). Adsorption of lipase from Candida rugosa on multi walled carbon nanotubes. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.19 (1), 279285. 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.012

  • 600

    Promsuwan K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Limbut W. (2020a). Nitrite amperometric sensor for gunshot residue screening. Electrochim Acta331, 135309. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135309

  • 601

    Promsuwan K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Limbut W. (2020b). Subnanomolar detection of promethazine abuse using a gold nanoparticle-graphene nanoplatelet-modified electrode. Microchim. ACTA187 (12), 646. 10.1007/s00604-020-04616-w

  • 602

    ProPublica (2025). “Courts are beginning to prevent the use of roadside drug tests,”. New York City, NY: ProPublica. Available online at: https://www.propublica.org/article/do-courts-use-roadside-drug-tests-accuracy.

  • 603

    Puiu M. Bala C. (2022). Affinity assays for cannabinoids detection: are they amenable to on-site screening?BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (8), 608. 10.3390/bios12080608

  • 604

    Puttasakul T. Tancharoen C. Sukjee W. Sangma C. (2022). Vapor-phase substrate nitroreductase reaction and its application as TNT electrochemical gas sensor. IEEE Sens. J.22 (23), 2236822373. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3214067

  • 605

  • 606

    Qader B. Hussain I. Baron M. Estevez-Brito R. Cassella J. P. Gonzalez-Rodriguez J. (2022). The production and evaluation of an electrochemical sensors for strychnine and its main metabolite strychnine N-oxide for their use in biological samples. MOLECULES27 (6), 1826. 10.3390/molecules27061826

  • 607

    Qin P. Yang H. H. Zhao X. X. Qu W. J. Yao H. Wei T. B. et al (2022b). A supramolecular polymer network constructed by pillar[5]arene-based host-guest interactions and its application in nitro explosive detection. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem.102 (3–4), 295302. 10.1007/s10847-021-01118-x

  • 608

    Qin Y. Mo F. Yao S. Wu Y. He Y. Yao W. (2022a). Facile synthesis of porous Ag crystals as SERS sensor for detection of five methamphetamine analogs. Molecules27 (12), 3939. 10.3390/molecules27123939

  • 609

    Qin Y. D. Bubiajiaer H. Yao J. Zhang M. W. (2022c). Based on unmodified aptamer-gold nanoparticles colorimetric detection of dexamethasone in food. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (4), 242. 10.3390/bios12040242

  • 610

    Qiu J. J. Ke D. M. Lin H. C. Yu Y. L. Zheng Q. H. Li H. et al (2023). Fabrication of high sensitivity 2-PEA sensor based on Aldehyde-functionalized mesoporous carbon. Chin. Chem. Lett.34 (1), 107391. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.114

  • 611

    Qiu Y. Wen Z. Q. Mei S. L. Wei J. X. Chen Y. Y. Hu Z. et al (2021). Cation crosslinking-induced stable copper nanoclusters powder as latent fingerprints marker. NANOMATERIALS11 (12), 3371. 10.3390/nano11123371

  • 612

    Qiu Y. Yu S. Li L. (2022). Research progress in fluorescent probes for arsenic species. Molecules27 (23), 8497. 10.3390/molecules27238497

  • 613

    Rahman A. Khaleque A. Ali Y. Rahman T. (2020). THz spectroscopic sensing of liquid chemicals using a photonic crystal fiber. OSA Contin.3 (11), 29822996. 10.1364/osac.403854

  • 614

    Rajan R. Zakaria Y. Shamsuddin S. Hassan N. F. N. (2020). Robust synthesis of mono-dispersed spherical silica nanoparticle from rice husk for high definition latent fingermark development. ARABIAN J. Chem.13 (11), 81198132. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.042

  • 615

    Rajput P. Shishodia M. S. (2020). Förster resonance energy transfer and molecular fluorescence near gain assisted refractory nitrides based plasmonic core-shell nanoparticle. Plasmonics15 (6), 20812093. 10.1007/s11468-020-01208-5

  • 616

    Ran C. H. Xu Z. Z. He J. P. Man Z. W. Lv Z. Wang P. et al (2022). Starch-based near-infrared organic fluorophores for the imaging of latent fingerprints. J. Mater Chem. C Mater10 (43), 1634716352. 10.1039/d2tc03532d

  • 617

    Ranbir S. G. Singh H. Kaur N. Singh N. (2023). Azodye-based colorimetric sensor array for identification of biogenic amines: food forensics by portable RGB-based signal readout. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL387, 133794. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133794

  • 618

    Rary E. Anderson S. M. Philbrick B. D. Suresh T. Burton J. (2020). Smart sanitation-biosensors as a public health tool in sanitation infrastructure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17 (14), 5146. 10.3390/ijerph17145146

  • 619

    Rasheed T. Nabeel F. Rizwan K. Bilal M. Hussain T. Shehzad S. A. (2020). Conjugated supramolecular architectures as state-of-the-art materials in detection and remedial measures of nitro based compounds: a review. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.129, 115958. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115958

  • 620

    Rasin P. Prabhakaran P. Basheer S. M. Manakkadan V. Palakkeezhill V. N. V. Sreekanth A. (2023). Pilot study on the visualization of latent fingerprints and naked eye detection of Hg2+and Zn2+Ions in aqueous media using ninhydrin-based thiosemicarbazone. Anal. Chem.95 (15), 64486457. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00579

  • 621

    Ravindra M. K. Darshan G. P. Lavanya D. R. Mahadevan K. M. Premkumar H. B. Sharma S. C. et al (2021). Aggregation induced emission based active conjugated imidazole luminogens for visualization of latent fingerprints and multiple anticounterfeiting applications. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 16748. 10.1038/s41598-021-96011-5

  • 622

    Raza A. Biswas A. Zehra A. Mengesha A. (2020). Multiple tier detection of TNT using curcumin functionalized silver nanoparticles. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.001

  • 623

    Razlansari M. Ulucan-Karnak F. Kahrizi M. Mirinejad S. Sargazi S. Mishra S. et al (2022). Nanobiosensors for detection of opioids: a review of latest advancements. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.179, 7994. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.08.017

  • 624

    Rebelo P. Pacheco J. G. Voroshylova I. V. Melo A. Cordeiro M. Delerue-Matos C. (2021). Rational development of molecular imprinted carbon paste electrode for Furazolidone detection: theoretical and experimental approach. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL329, 129112. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129112

  • 625

    Reese T. Suarez C. Premasiri W. R. Shaine M. L. Ingraham H. Brodeur A. N. et al (2021). Surface enhanced Raman scattering specificity for detection and identification of dried bloodstains. Forensic Sci. Int.328, 111000. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111000

  • 626

    Regula Forensics (2025). How to tell if money is fake: detect counterfeit money. Available online at: https://regulaforensics.com/blog/detect-counterfeit-money/.

  • 627

    Ren J. Mao S. J. Lin J. D. Xu Y. Zhu Q. Q. Xu N. (2022). Research progress of Raman spectroscopy and Raman imaging in pharmaceutical analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des.28 (18), 14451456. 10.2174/1381612828666220518145635

  • 628

    Ren S. F. Zeng J. L. Zheng Z. X. Shi H. Q. (2021). Perspective and application of modified electrode material technology in electrochemical voltammetric sensors for analysis and detection of illicit drugs. SENSORS ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL329, 112821. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.112821

  • 629

    Renuka L. Anantharaju K. S. Gurushantha K. Nagabhushana H. Vidya Y. S. Suresh C. et al (2021). Phase-transformation synthesis of Li codoped ZrO2: Eu3+ nanomaterials: characterization, photocatalytic, luminescent behaviour and latent fingerprint development. Ceram. Int.47 (7), 1033210345. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.152

  • 630

    Ribeiro M. F. M. Bento F. Ipólito A. J. Oliveira M. F. de (2020). Development of a pencil drawn paper-based analytical device to detect lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). J. Forensic Sci.65 (6), 21212128. 10.1111/1556-4029.14494

  • 631

    Ricci P. P. Gregory O. J. (2020). Continuous monitoring of TATP using ultrasensitive, low-power sensors. IEEE Sens. J.20 (23), 1405814064. 10.1109/jsen.2020.3008254

  • 632

    Ricci P. P. Gregory O. J. (2021). Free-standing, thin-film sensors for the trace detection of explosives. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 66236710. 10.1038/s41598-021-86077-6

  • 633

    Rocha D. S. Duarte L. C. Silva-Neto H. A. Chagas C. L. S. Santana M. H. P. Antoniosi N. R. et al (2021a). Sandpaper-based electrochemical devices assembled on a reusable 3D-printed holder to detect date rape drug in beverages. Talanta232, 122408. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122408

  • 634

    Rocha R. G. Ribeiro J. S. Santana M. H. P. Richter E. M. Muñoz R. A. A. (2021b). 3D-printing for forensic chemistry: voltammetric determination of cocaine on additively manufactured graphene–polylactic acid electrodes. Anal. Methods13 (15), 17881794. 10.1039/d1ay00181g

  • 635

    Rocha R. G. Silva W. P. Sousa R. M. F. Junior M. C. Santana M. H. P. Munoz R. A. A. et al (2020). Investigation of midazolam electro-oxidation on boron doped diamond electrode by voltammetric techniques and density functional theory calculations: application in beverage samples. Talanta207, 120319. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120319

  • 636

    Rocher J. Aldegheishem A. Alrajeh N. Lloret J. (2022). Develop an optical sensor to detect pollution incidents in sewerage. IEEE Sens. J.22 (24), 2444924457. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3219931

  • 637

    Rocher J. Parra M. Parra L. Sendra S. Lloret J. Mengual J. (2021). “A low-cost sensor for detecting illicit discharge in sewerage,”. J sens. Editor MichelC., 2021. 10.1155/2021/6650157

  • 638

    Ross G. M. S. Zhao Y. Bosman A. J. Geballa-Koukoula A. Zhou H. Elliott C. T. et al (2023). Best practices and current implementation of emerging smartphone-based (bio)sensors- Part 1: data handling and ethics. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.158, 116863. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116863

  • 639

    Roushani M. Ghanbarzadeh M. Shahdost-Fard F. (2021). Fabrication of an electrochemical biodevice for ractopamine detection under a strategy of a double recognition of the aptamer/molecular imprinting polymer. BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY138, 107722. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107722

  • 640

    Ruchala I. Battisti U. M. Nguyen V. T. Chen R. Y. T. Glennon R. A. Eltit J. M. (2021). Functional characterization of N-octyl 4-methylamphetamine variants and related bivalent compounds at the dopamine and serotonin transporters using Ca2+ channels as sensors. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.419, 115513. 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115513

  • 641

    Rui H. Ting Y. Yan M. Y. (2023). Advances in the application of novel carbon nanomaterials in illicit drug detection. NEW J. Chem.47 (5), 21612172. 10.1039/d2nj04816g

  • 642

    Ryu J. Kim Y. (2022). Overcoming interferences in the colorimetric and fluorimetric detection of γ-hydroxybutyrate in spiked beverages. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL364, 131861. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131861

  • 643

    Sachdeva D. Singh A. Agrawal V. V. (2021). Electrochemical detection of anti-anxiety drug clonazepam using electrophoretically deposited gold nanoparticles. MAPAN-JOURNAL METROLOGY Soc. INDIA36 (3), 639649. 10.1007/s12647-021-00484-8

  • 644

    Sadeghi M. Jahanshahi M. Javadian H. (2020). Highly sensitive biosensor for detection of DNA nucleobases: enhanced electrochemical sensing based on polyaniline/single-layer MoS2 nanosheets nanocomposite modified carbon paste electrode. Microchem. J.152, 104315. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104315

  • 645

    Saha A. Kurrey R. Verma S. K. Deb M. K. (2022). Cationic polystyrene resin bound silver nanocomposites assisted fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for enhanced catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol in aqueous medium. Chem. East.4 (4), 17571774. 10.3390/chemistry4040114

  • 646

    Saichanapan J. Promsuwan K. Limbut W. (2020). Adsorption and determination of sibutramine in illegal slimming product using porous graphene ink-modified electrode. Talanta212, 120788. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120788

  • 647

    Saisahas K. Soleh A. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. Phonchai A. Sadiq N. S. M. et al (2022a). Nanocoral-like polyaniline-modified graphene-based electrochemical paper-based analytical device for a portable electrochemical sensor for xylazine detection. ACS Omega7 (15), 1391313924. 10.1021/acsomega.2c00295

  • 648

    Saisahas K. Soleh A. Somsiri S. Senglan P. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. et al (2022b). Electrochemical sensor for methamphetamine detection using laser-induced porous graphene electrode. Nanomaterials12 (1), 73. 10.3390/nano12010073

  • 649

    Sanguarnsak C. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. Soleh A. Saisahas K. Phua C. H. et al (2022). Voltammetric amitriptyline determination using a metal-free electrode based on phosphorus-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (1), 017510. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac48c4

  • 650

    Sanli S. Moulahoum H. Ghorbanizamani F. Gumus Z. P. Timur S. (2020). On-site testosterone biosensing for doping detection: electrochemical immunosensing via functionalized magnetic nanoparticles and screen-printed electrodes. ChemistrySelect5 (47), 1491114916. 10.1002/slct.202004204

  • 651

    Santana E. R. Martins E. C. Spinelli A. (2021). Electrode modified with nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots supported in chitosan for triclocarban monitoring. Microchem. J.167, 106297. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106297

  • 652

    Santillo M. F. (2020). Trends using biological target-based assays for drug detection in complex sample matrices. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (17), 39753982. 10.1007/s00216-020-02681-x

  • 653

    Santoro R. Caccia M. Ampilogov N. Malinverno L. Allwork C. Ellis M. et al (2020). Qualification of a compact neutron detector based on SiPM. J. Instrum.15 (5), C05053. 10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/c05053

  • 654

    Santos A. Deokaran G. O. Costa C. V. Gama L. Mazzini E. G. de Assis A. M. L. et al (2021). A “turn-off” fluorescent sensor based on electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers and fluorene(bisthiophene) derivative for nitroaromatic explosive detection. Forensic Sci. Int.329, 111056. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111056

  • 655

    Schmidt V. M. Zelger P. Wöss C. Huck C. W. Arora R. Bechtel E. et al (2022). Post-Mortem interval of human skeletal remains estimated with handheld NIR spectrometry. BIOLOGY-BASEL11 (7), 1020. 10.3390/biology11071020

  • 656

    Schram J. Parrilla M. Slosse A. Van Durme F. Aberg J. Bjork K. et al (2022). Paraformaldehyde-coated electrochemical sensor for improved on-site detection of amphetamine in street samples. Microchem. J.179, 107518. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107518

  • 657

    Scorsone E. Manai R. Cali K. Ricatti M. J. Farno S. Persaud K. et al (2021). Biosensor array based on ligand binding proteins for narcotics and explosives detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem.334, 129587. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129587

  • 658

    Sekar A. Vadivel R. Munuswamy R. G. Yadav R. (2021). Fluorescence spotting of latent sweat fingerprints with zinc oxide carbon dots embedded in a silica gel nanopowder: a green approach. NEW J. Chem.45 (37), 1744717460. 10.1039/d1nj03901f

  • 659

    Senesi G. S. Harmon R. S. Hark R. R. (2021). Field-portable and handheld laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: historical review, current status and future prospects. Spectrochim. Acta Part B A. T. Spectrosc.175, 106013. 10.1016/j.sab.2020.106013

  • 660

    Senra M. V. X. Fonseca A. L. (2021). New tyrosinases with putative action against contaminants of emerging concern. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma.89 (9), 11801192. 10.1002/prot.26139

  • 661

    Sfragano P. S. Laschi S. Palchetti I. (2020). Sustainable printed electrochemical platforms for greener analytics. Front. Chem.8, 644. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00644

  • 662

    Sha O. Liu H. Ye M. Q. Zhu Y. Q. Yao J. W. Li Z. M. et al (2021). Solvent-free mechanochemical preparation of graphene oxide-Fe3O4 and its application in magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction of illegal dyes in food samples. J. Sep. Sci.44 (11), 22902300. 10.1002/jssc.202001084

  • 663

    Sha X. Y. Han S. Zhao H. Li N. Zhang C. Hasi W. L. J. (2020). A rapid detection method for on-site screening of estazolam in beverages with Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles paper-based SERS substrate. Anal. Sci.36 (6), 667671. 10.2116/analsci.19p361

  • 664

    Shabashini A. Panja S. K. Nandi G. C. (2021). Applications of carbon dots (CDs) in latent fingerprints imaging. Chem. Asian J.16 (9), 10571072. 10.1002/asia.202100119

  • 665

    Shah S. N. A. Gul E. Hayat F. Rehman Z. Khan M. (2023). Advancement and perspectives of sulfite-based chemiluminescence, its mechanism, and sensing. CHEMOSENSORS11 (4), 212. 10.3390/chemosensors11040212

  • 666

    Shahbazi S. Becker T. Jia G. H. Lewis S. W. (2022). Luminescent nanostructures for the detection of latent fingermarks: a review. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.4 (2). 10.1002/wfs2.1440

  • 667

    Shahbazi S. Boseley R. Grant B. Chen D. C. Becker T. Adegoke O. et al (2020). Luminescence detection of latent fingermarks on non -porous surfaces with heavy -metal -free quantum dots. FORENSIC Chem.18, 100222. 10.1016/j.forc.2020.100222

  • 668

    Shalini Devi K. S. Anantharamakrishnan A. Maheswari Krishnan U. (2021). Expanding horizons of metal oxide-based chemical and electrochemical sensors. Electroanalysis33 (9), 19791996. 10.1002/elan.202100087

  • 669

    Shamseer L. Moher D. Clarke M. Ghersi D. Liberati A. Petticrew M. et al (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ349, g7647. 10.1136/bmj.g7647

  • 670

    Shao Y. L. Duan J. Q. Wang M. Cao J. She Y. X. Cao Z. et al (2023). Application of molecularly imprinted electrochemical biomimetic sensors for detecting small molecule food contaminants. Polym. (Basel)15 (1), 187. 10.3390/polym15010187

  • 671

    Sharma V. Choudhary S. Mankotia P. Kumari A. Sharma K. Sehgal R. et al (2021). Nanoparticles as fingermark sensors. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.143, 116378. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116378

  • 672

    Shi B. Q. Catsamas S. Kolotelo P. Wang M. Lintern A. Jovanovic D. et al (2021). A low-cost water depth and electrical conductivity sensor for detecting inputs into urban stormwater networks. SENSORS21 (9), 3056. 10.3390/s21093056

  • 673

    Shin J. Song Y. G. Jung S. J. Yoon T. Kim G. S. Kim J. H. et al (2020). Smart forensic kit: real-time estimation of postmortem interval using a highly sensitive gas sensor for microbial forensics. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL322, 128612. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128612

  • 674

    Shishkanova T. V. Trchová M. Sinica A. Fitl P. Matejka P. (2021). Electrochemical sensor for phenylpropanolamine based on oligomer derived from 3-hydroxybenzoic acid with dibenzo-18-crown-6. J. Electroanal. Chem., 882. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114963

  • 675

    Shishkanova T. V. Vatrsková L. Spálovská D. Králík F. Curínová P. Winkler M. et al (2020). Complexation of cathinones by 4-tert-butylcalix[4]arene tetra-acetate as a possible technique for forensic analysis. Forensic Toxicol.38 (1), 7078. 10.1007/s11419-019-00489-8

  • 676

    Shkembi X. Botero M. L. Skouridou V. Jauset-Rubio M. Svobodova M. Ballester P. et al (2022). Novel nandrolone aptamer for rapid colorimetric detection of anabolic steroids. Anal. Biochem.658, 114937. 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114937

  • 677

    Shrivastava P. Jain S. K. Kumar N. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021a). Handheld device for rapid detection of lead (Pb2+) in gunshot residue for forensic application. Microchem. J.165, 106186. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106186

  • 678

    Shrivastava P. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021c). Gunshot residue detection technologies—a review. Egypt. J. Forensic Sci.11 (1), 1121. 10.1186/s41935-021-00223-9

  • 679

    Shrivastava P. Singh B. P. Jain S. K. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021b). A novel approach to detect barium in gunshot residue using a handheld device: a forensic application. Anal. Methods13 (38), 43794389. 10.1039/d1ay01272j

  • 680

    Silva T. G. da Paixao T. (2022). Development and evaluation of two different electronic tongues aiming to the discrimination of cutting agents found in cocaine seized samples. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.9 (34), 188197. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.AR-59-2021

  • 681

    Silva W. P. Rocha R. G. Arantes L. C. Lima C. D. Melo L. M. A. Munoz R. A. A. et al (2021). Development of a simple and rapid screening method for the detection of 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine in forensic samples. Talanta233, 122597. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122597

  • 682

    Singh A. P. Balayan S. Gupta S. Jain U. Sarin R. K. Chauhan N. (2021). Detection of pesticide residues utilizing enzyme-electrode interface via nano-patterning of TiO2 nanoparticles and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. PROCESS Biochem.108, 185193. 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.06.015

  • 683

    Singh A. P. Balayan S. Hooda V. Sarin R. K. Chauhan N. (2020). Nano-interface driven electrochemical sensor for pesticides detection based on the acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.164, 39433952. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.215

  • 684

    Singh H. Kour S. Selvaraj M. (2022a). Magnetically separable template assisted iron nanoparticle for the enhancement of latent fingerprints. J. INDIAN Chem. Soc.99 (9), 100661. 10.1016/j.jics.2022.100661

  • 685

    Singh N. K. Sidhu G. K. Gupta K. (2022b). Current and future perspective of devices and diagnostics for opioid and OIRD. Biomedicines10 (4), 743. 10.3390/biomedicines10040743

  • 686

    Singh V. Kamthania M. C. Mishra N. Singh S. (2014). Biosensor developments: application in crime detection. Int. J. Eng. Tech. Res. (special issue), 163.

  • 687

    Smith M. Logan M. Bazley M. Blanchfield J. Stokes R. Blanco A. et al (2021). A Semi-quantitative method for the detection of fentanyl using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with a handheld Raman instrument. J. Forensic Sci.66 (2), 505519. 10.1111/1556-4029.14610

  • 688

    Smith V. Devane D. Begley C. M. Clarke M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.11 (1), 15. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15

  • 689

    Soanes C. Stevenson A. (2008). Concise oxford English dictionary. 6th ed.Oxford University Press. Available online at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/concise-oxford-english-dictionary/oclc/226280329?page=citation.

  • 690

    Sohouli E. Ghalkhani M. Rostami M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi M. Ahmadi F. (2020). A noble electrochemical sensor based on TiO2@CuO-N-rGO and poly (L-cysteine) nanocomposite applicable for trace analysis of flunitrazepam. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-MATERIALS Biol. Appl.117, 111300. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111300

  • 691

    Soliman S. S. Mahmoud A. M. Elghobashy M. R. Zaazaa H. E. Sedik G. A. (2023). Point-of-care electrochemical sensor for selective determination of date rape drug “ketamine” based on core-shell molecularly imprinted polymer. Talanta.254, 124151. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124151

  • 692

    Solin K. Vuoriluoto M. Khakalo A. Tammelin T. (2023). Cannabis detection with solid sensors and paper-based immunoassays by conjugating antibodies to nanocellulose. Carbohydr. Polym.304, 120517. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120517

  • 693

    Son S. U. Jang S. Kang B. Kim J. Lim J. Seo S. et al (2021). Colorimetric paper sensor for visual detection of date-rape drug γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL347, 130598. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130598

  • 694

    Soni S. Jain U. Burke D. H. Chauhan N. (2022a). Development of nanomaterial-modified impedimetric aptasensor—a single-step strategy for 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine detection. Biosens. (Basel).12 (7), 538. 10.3390/bios12070538

  • 695

    Soni S. Jain U. Burke D. H. Chauhan N. (2022b). Recent trends and emerging strategies for aptasensing technologies for illicit drugs detection. J. Electroanal. Chem.910, 116128. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116128

  • 696

    Soni S. Jain U. Chauhan N. (2021). A systematic review on sensing techniques for drug-facilitated sexual assaults (DFSA) monitoring. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.49 (11), 8392. 10.1016/j.cjac.2021.09.001

  • 697

    Sposito H. G. M. Lobato A. Tasic N. O. Maldaner A. O. Paixao T. Goncalves L. M. (2022). Swift electrochemical sensing of diltiazem employing highly-selective molecularly-imprinted 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid. J. Electroanal. Chem.911, 116207. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116207

  • 698

    Srivastava B. B. Gupta S. K. Mao Y. B. (2020). Single red emission from upconverting ZnGa2O4:Yb,Er nanoparticles co-doped by Cr3+. J. Mater Chem. C Mater8 (19), 63706379. 10.1039/d0tc00411a

  • 699

    Su H. Li S. Jin Y. Xian Z. Yang D. Zhou W. et al (2017). Nanomaterial-based biosensors for biological detections. Adv. Health Care Technol.3, 1929. 10.2147/ahct.s94025

  • 700

    Su L. J. (2022). Overview on the sensors for direct electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in sports. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (12), 221260. 10.20964/2022.12.64

  • 701

    Su X. M. Liu X. Y. Xie Y. C. Z. Chen M. Y. Zhong H. Li M. (2023). Quantitative label-free SERS detection of trace fentanyl in biofluids with a freestanding hydrophobic plasmonic paper biosensor. Anal. Chem.95, 38213829. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05211

  • 702

    Su Z. Li Y. Li J. Dou X. (2021). Ultrasensitive luminescent turn-on detection of perchlorate particulates by triggering supramolecular self-assembly of platinum(II) complex in hydrogel matrix. Sens. Actuators B Chem.336, 129728. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129728

  • 703

    Su Z. Li Y. S. Li J. G. Li K. Dou X. C. (2022). Ultrasensitive dual-mode visualization of perchlorate in water, soil and air boosted by close and stable Pt-Pt packing endowed low-energy absorption and emission. J. Mater Chem. A Mater10 (15), 81958207. 10.1039/d2ta00843b

  • 704

    Suarez C. Premasiri W. R. Ingraham H. Brodeur A. N. Ziegler L. D. (2023). Ultra-sensitive, rapid detection of dried bloodstains by surface enhanced Raman scattering on Ag substrates. Talanta259, 124535. 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124535

  • 705

    Suhasini R. Karpagam R. Thirumoorthy K. Thiagarajan V. (2021). “Turn-on” unsymmetrical azine based fluorophore for the selective detection of diethylchlorophosphate via photoinduced electron transfer to intramolecular charge transfer pathway. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.263, 120206. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120206

  • 706

    Suherman K. D. C. Morita K. Kawaguchi T. (2020). Surface plasmon resonance signal amplification using secondary antibody interaction for illegal compound detection. Key Eng. Mater845, 103108. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.845.103

  • 707

    Sun R. M. Lv R. J. Li Y. H. Du T. Chen L. X. Zhang Y. et al (2023). Simple and sensitive electrochemical detection of sunset yellow and Sudan I in food based on AuNPs/Zr-MOF-Graphene. Food control.145, 109491. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109491

  • 708

    Sun Y. Y. Li W. Zhao L. Q. Li F. Y. Xie Y. F. Yao W. R. et al (2021). Simultaneous SERS detection of illegal food additives rhodamine B and basic orange II based on Au nanorod-incorporated melamine foam. Food Chem.357, 129741. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129741

  • 709

    Sundhoro M. Agnihotra S. R. Khan N. D. Barnes A. BelBruno J. Mendecki L. (2021). Rapid and accurate electrochemical sensor for food allergen detection in complex foods. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 20831. 10.1038/s41598-021-00241-6

  • 710

    Suresh C. Darshan G. P. Sharma S. C. Venkataravanappa M. Premkumar H. B. Shanthi S. et al (2020). Imaging sweat pore structures in latent fingerprints and unclonable anti-counterfeiting patterns by sensitizers blended LaOF: Pr3+ nanophosphors. Opt. Mater (Amst).100, 109625. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109625

  • 711

    Suryoprabowo S. Liu L. Q. Kuang H. Cui G. Xu C. L. (2021). Fluorescence based immunochromatographic sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of tadalafil and comparison with a gold lateral flow immunoassay. Food Chem.342, 128255. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128255

  • 712

    Suslick K. S. Rakow N. A. Sen A. (2004). Colorimetric sensor arrays for molecular recognition. Tetrahedron60 (49), 1113311138. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.09.007

  • 713

    Swathi B. N. Krushna B. R. R. Prasad B. D. Sharma S. C. Subramanian B. Nagabhushana H. (2023). Unclonable fluorescence of MgO-ZrO2:Tb3+ nanocomposite for versatile applications in data security, dermatoglyphics. LUMINESCENCE.38 (3), 232249. 10.1002/bio.4440

  • 714

    Symonsbergen D. J. Kangas M. J. Perez M. Holmes A. E. (2018). International Journal of Criminal and Forensic Science Evaluation of the NIK® test: primary general screening test for the presumptive identification of drugs.

  • 715

    Szczeszak A. Skwierczynska M. Przybylska D. Runowski M. Smiechowicz E. Erdman A. et al (2020). Upconversion luminescence in cellulose composites (fibres and paper) modified with lanthanide-doped SrF2 nanoparticles. J. Mater Chem. C Mater8 (34), 1192211928. 10.1039/D0TC02050H

  • 716

    Takahashi F. Kazui Y. Miyaguchi H. Ohmori T. Tanaka R. Jin J. Y. (2021). Simple colorimetric screening of the nerve agent VX using gold nanoparticles and a hand-powered extraction device. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL327, 128902. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128902

  • 717

    Takahashi F. Nitta S. Shimizu R. Shoji T. Tatsumi H. Jin J. (2022). Sensitive screening of methamphetamine stimulant using potential-modulated electrochemiluminescence. Anal. Chim. Acta.1191, 339229. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339229

  • 718

    Tan R. Shen Y. Li D. N. Yang Y. Tu Y. F. (2022). The electrochemiluminescent immunosensors for point-of-care testing of methamphetamine using a portable meter. Electroanalysis34 (2), 423431. 10.1002/elan.202060590

  • 719

    Tan X. P. Fan Y. M. Wang S. Wu Y. Shi W. B. Huang T. et al (2020). Ultrasensitive and highly selective electrochemical sensing of sodium picrate by Dihydroxylatopillar[6]arene-Modified gold nanoparticles and cationic Pillar[6]arene functionalized covalent organic framework. Electrochim Acta335, 135706. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135706

  • 720

    Tang C. He Z. Liu H. Xu Y. Huang H. Yang G. et al (2020). Application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection. J. Nanobiotechnology18, 6219. 10.1186/s12951-020-00613-6

  • 721

    Tao X. Q. Peng Y. Y. Liu J. W. (2020). Nanomaterial-based fluorescent biosensors for veterinary drug detection in foods. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 575594. 10.38212/2224-6614.1267

  • 722

    Tasangtong B. Henry C. S. Sameenoi Y. (2023). Diameter-based inkjet-printed paper devices for formaldehyde analysis in foods. Food control.145, 109408. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109408

  • 723

    Tay L. L. Hulse J. (2021). Methodology for binary detection analysis of inkjet-printed optical sensors for chemical detection. MRS Adv.6 (1), 15. 10.1557/s43580-021-00004-5

  • 724

    Teng X. Ding X. She Z. Li Y. Xiong X. (2023). Preparation of functionalized magnetic polystyrene microspheres and their application in food safety detection. Polym. (Basel)15 (1), 77. 10.3390/polym15010077

  • 725

    Testler (2025). Device type approval tests. Available online at: https://www.laboratuar.com/en/testler/tip-onay-testleri/cihaz-tip-onay-testleri/.

  • 726

    Teymourian H. Parrilla M. Sempionatto J. R. Montiel N. F. Barfidokht A. Van Echelpoel R. et al (2020). Wearable electrochemical sensors for the monitoring and screening of drugs. ACS Sens.5 (9), 26792700. 10.1021/acssensors.0c01318

  • 727

    Thakarda J. Agrawal B. Anil D. Jana A. Maity P. (2020). Detection of trace-level nitroaromatic explosives by 1-pyreneiodide-ligated luminescent gold nanostructures and their forensic applications. LANGMUIR36 (50), 1544215449. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03117

  • 728

  • 729

    Thermo Scientific (2024). Product specifications Thermo scientific TruDefender FT and TruDefender FTi handheld FTIR for unknown chemical and explosives identification. Available online at: www.thermoscientific.com/safety-chemid.

  • 730

    Thipwimonmas Y. Jaidam J. Samoson K. Khunseeraksa V. Phonchai A. Thiangchanya A. et al (2021). A simple and rapid spectrophotometric method for nitrite detection in small sample volumes. CHEMOSENSORS9 (7), 161. 10.3390/chemosensors9070161

  • 731

    Thomas J. Brunton J. Graziosi S. (2010). EPPI-reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. EPPI-centre software: London: social science research unit. London, United Kingdom: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

  • 732

    Tiedge T. M. McAtee P. D. McCormick M. N. Lakhtakia A. Roy R. (2020). Massively parallel sequencing and STR analysis from partial bloody fingerprints enhanced with columnar thin films. FORENSIC Sci. INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS49, 102369. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102369

  • 733

    Tomar A. Gupta R. R. Mehta S. K. Sharma S. (2023). An overview of security materials in banknotes and analytical techniques in detecting counterfeits. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 28652878. 10.1080/10408347.2023.2209185

  • 734

    Torrarit K. Kongkaew S. Samoson K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Chang K. H. et al (2022). Flow injection amperometric measurement of formalin in seafood. ACS Omega7 (21), 1767917691. 10.1021/acsomega.2c00515

  • 735

    Tortajada-Genaro L. A. Lucío M. I. Maquieira A. (2022). Fast DNA biosensing based on isothermal amplification, unmodified gold nanoparticles, and smartphone detection. Food control.137, 108943. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108943

  • 736

    Trabelsi H. Akl M. Akl S. H. (2021). Ultrasound assisted Eu3+–doped strontium titanate nanophosphors: labeling agent useful for visualization of latent fingerprints. Powder Technol.384, 7081. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.006

  • 737

    TRUSCANRM (2025). Handheld Raman analyzer. Available online at: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/TRUSCANRM.

  • 738

    Truta F. Florea A. Cernat A. Tertis M. Hosu O. de Wael K. et al (2020). Tackling the problem of sensing commonly abused drugs through nanomaterials and (Bio)Recognition approaches. Front. Chem.8, 561638. 10.3389/fchem.2020.561638

  • 739

    Tuccitto N. Riela L. Zammataro A. Spitaleri L. Li-Destri G. Sfuncia G. et al (2020c). Functionalized carbon nanoparticle-based sensors for chemical warfare agents. ACS Appl. Nano Mater3 (8), 81828191. 10.1021/acsanm.0c01593

  • 740

    Tuccitto N. Spitaleri L. Gulino A. Li Destri G. Pappalardo A. Sfrazzetto G. T. (2020b). The state of the art in biodefense related bacterial pathogen detection using bacteriophages: how it started and how it’s going. Viruses12 (12), 1393. 10.3390/v12121393

  • 741

    Tuccitto N. Spitaleri L. Gulino A. Li Destri G. Sfrazzetto G. T. Trusso Sfrazzetto G. (2020a). Supramolecular sensing of a chemical warfare agents simulant by functionalized carbon nanoparticles. Molecules25 (23), 5731. 10.3390/molecules25235731

  • 742

    Tyree D. J. Brothers M. C. Sim D. Flory L. Tomb M. Strayer K. et al (2023). Detection of asthma inhaler use via terahertz spectroscopy. ACS Sens.8, 610618. 10.1021/acssensors.2c01795

  • 743

    United Nations (2023). World drug report. New York, United States: United Nations.

  • 744

    United Nations (2025). Sustainable development goals. New York, United States: United Nations. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/.

  • 745

    Upadhyay H. Harikrishnan U. Bhatt D. Dhadnekar N. Kumar K. Panchal M. (2022). Calixarene: the dawn of a new era in forensic chemistry. Curr. Org. Chem.26 (22), 20052015. 10.2174/1385272827666230118094847

  • 746

    Urbanová V. Pumera M. (2020). Uranium detection by 3D-printed titanium structures: towards decentralized nuclear forensic applications. Appl. Mater Today21, 100881. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100881

  • 747

    Uttpal A. Singh C. A. K. Patrik O. Amarnath M. Ondrej K. Raval I. H. et al (2022). Recent advances in the potential applications of luminescence-based, SPR-based, and carbon-based biosensors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.106 (8), 28272853. 10.1007/s00253-022-11901-6

  • 748

    Vadivel R. Nirmala M. Anbukumaran K. (2021). Commonly available, everyday materials as non-conventional powders for the visualization of latent fingerprints. FORENSIC Chem.24, 100339. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100339

  • 749

    van Damme I. M. Mestres-Fitó P. Ramaker H. J. Hulsbergen A. W. C. Heijden AEDM van der Kranenburg R. F. et al (2023). Rapid and on-scene chemical identification of intact explosives with portable near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Sensors23 (8), 3804. 10.3390/s23083804

  • 750

    Van Echelpoel R. Kranenburg R. F. van Asten A. C. De Wael K. (2022). Electrochemical detection of MDMA and 2C-B in ecstasy tablets using a selectivity enhancement strategy by in-situ derivatization. FORENSIC Chem.27, 100383. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100383

  • 751

    Van Echelpoel R. Parrilla M. Sleegers N. Shanmugam S. T. van Nuijs A. L. N. Slosse A. et al (2023). Validated portable device for the qualitative and quantitative electrochemical detection of MDMA ready for on-site use. Microchem. J.190, 108693. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108693

  • 752

    Vargas A. F. L. Buitrago W. G. Q. Silva D. C. C. Suarez J. F. M. (2022). Voltammetric responses of a CYP2D6-based biosensor to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and the synthetic cathinone α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP). ChemistrySelect7 (42). 10.1002/slct.202202748

  • 753

    Vendamani V. S. Beeram R. Rao S. Rao S. V. (2023). Protocol for designing AuNP-capped Ag dendrites as surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensors for trace molecular detection. Star. Protoc.4 (1), 102068. 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102068

  • 754

    Verbitskiy E. V. Rusinov G. L. Chupakhin O. N. Charushin V. N. (2020). Design of fluorescent sensors based on azaheterocyclic push-pull systems towards nitroaromatic explosives and related compounds: a review. DYES PIGMENTS180, 108414. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108414

  • 755

    Verhagen A. Kelarakis A. (2020). Carbon dots for forensic applications: a critical review. NANOMATERIALS10 (8), 1535. 10.3390/nano10081535

  • 756

    Viola R. Liberatore N. Mengali S. Elmi I. Tamarri F. Zampolli S. (2023). Lightweight gas sensor based on MEMS pre-concentration and infrared absorption spectroscopy inside a hollow fiber. SENSORS23 (5), 2809. 10.3390/s23052809

  • 757

    Vuckovic N. Glodovic N. Radovanovic Z. Janackovic D. Milasinovic N. (2021). A novel chitosan/tripolyphosphate/L-lysine conjugates for latent fingerprints detection and enhancement. J. Forensic Sci.66 (1), 149160. 10.1111/1556-4029.14569

  • 758

    Vunckx K. Geelen B. Garcia Munoz V. Lee W. Chang H. Van Dorpe P. et al (2020). Towards a miniaturized application-specific Raman spectrometer. (Bellingham, WA: SPIE (The International Society for Optics and Photonics)). 8.

  • 759

    Wahba M. E. K. Ayman A. Zeid A. M. El-Shabrawy Y. Draz M. E. (2023). Portable and green solid contact potentiometric sensor for the rapid and direct assay of clozapine in post-mortem rat liver and dosage forms: an analytical approach to forensic and pharmaceutical samples. Microchem. J.186, 108364. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108364

  • 760

    Wan J. W. Chen L. Li W. Cui S. F. Yuan B. F. (2022). Preparation of novel magnetic nanomaterials based on “facile coprecipitation” for developing latent fingerprints (LFP) in crime scenes. ACS Omega7 (2), 17121721. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04208

  • 761

    Wang B. Kang K. Ji X. Liu Y. Li X. Wang L. et al Multifunctional encapsulating gold nanoparticles into Cu-Hemin/Metal-Organic frameworks for catechol electrochemical detection on graphene-based electrode (2020c). ;15, 2050155, 10.1142/s179329202050155612).

  • 762

    Wang B. Xie K. Z. Lee K. H. (2021c). Veterinary drug residues in animal-derived foods: sample preparation and analytical methods. FOODS10 (3), 555. 10.3390/foods10030555

  • 763

    Wang C. Luo J. Dou H. Raise A. Ali M. S. Fan W. et al (2023b). Optimization and analytical behavior of a morphine electrochemical sensor in environmental and biological samples based on graphite rod electrode using graphene/Co3O4 nanocomposite. Chemosphere326, 138451. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138451

  • 764

    Wang C. D. Xu X. H. Qiu G. Y. Ye W. C. Li Y. M. Harris R. A. et al (2021e). Group-Targeting SERS screening of total benzodiazepines based on large-size (111) faceted silver nanosheets decorated with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Anal. Chem.93 (7), 34033410. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04399

  • 765

    Wang G. F. Cai Z. Z. Dou X. C. (2021a). Colorimetric logic design for rapid and precise discrimination of nitrate-based improvised explosives. Cell. Rep. Phys. Sci.2 (2), 100317. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100317

  • 766

    Wang J. Liu J. L. Wang M. Qiu Y. L. Kong J. M. Zhang X. J. (2021d). A host guest interaction enhanced polymerization amplification for electrochemical detection of cocaine. Anal. Chim. Acta.1184, 339041. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339041

  • 767

    Wang J. Xu H. Luo L. Li N. N. Qiao C. X. Wu J. F. et al (2023a). Rapid detection of whole active ricin using a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sandwich immunoassay. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.54 (2), 137149. 10.1002/jrs.6464

  • 768

    Wang J. J. Wu Y. Wu Q. H. Li L. Wang Y. Yang H. (2020f). Highly sensitive detection of melamine in milk samples based on N-methylmesoporphyrin IX/G-quadruplex structure. Microchem. J.155, 104751. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104751

  • 769

    Wang L. J. Zhou H. Hu H. X. Wang Q. Chen X. G. (2022c). Regulation mechanism of ssDNA aptamer in nanozymes and application of nanozyme-based aptasensors in food safety. FOODS11 (4), 544. 10.3390/foods11040544

  • 770

    Wang M. Shen D. P. Zhu Z. X. Ju J. S. Wu J. Zhu Y. et al (2020d). Dual-mode fluorescent development of latent fingerprints using NaYbF4:Tm upconversion nanomaterials. Mater Today Adv.8, 100113. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100113

  • 771

    Wang M. Wang C. M. Ma R. T. (2020a). Explosive detection and identification using X-ray fluorescence and thermal fingerprint of silica encapsulated nanoparticles. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS601, 125027. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125027

  • 772

    Wang N. Gao J. Enjing T. Yu W. Li H. Zhang J. et al (2022e). Rapid Russula senecis identification assays using loop-mediated isothermal amplification based on real-time fluorescence and visualization. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.106 (3), 12271239. 10.1007/s00253-022-11774-9

  • 773

    Wang S. Peng T. H. Li S. K. Wang L. L. Zhang L. Yin Z. W. et al (2022a). Natural interface-mediated self-assembly of graphene-isolated-nanocrystals for plasmonic arrays construction and personalized information acquisition. Nano Res.15 (10), 93279333. 10.1007/s12274-022-4602-1

  • 774

    Wang X. Liao T. Wang H. Y. Hao H. X. Yang Q. L. Zhou H. et al (2022b). Novel organic-inorganic hybrid polystyrene nanoparticles with trichromatic luminescence for the detection of latent fingerprints. Int. J. Anal. Chem.2022, 18. 10.1155/2022/2230360

  • 775

    Wang Y. Li Z. Lin H. Siddanakoppalu P. N. Zhou J. Chen G. et al (2019). Quantum-dot-based lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of crustacean major allergen tropomyosin. Food control.106, 106714. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106714

  • 776

    Wang Y. Teng X. Y. Cao J. Y. Fan Y. L. Liu X. L. Guo X. Y. et al (2022f). Detection of 3,4-methylene dioxy amphetamine in urine by magnetically improved surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensing strategy. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (9), 711. 10.3390/bios12090711

  • 777

    Wang Y. P. Ju W. Chen J. J. Liu Z. Y. Wang J. S. (2020e). One-Step synthesis of solid-state photoluminescent carbon nanodots from grains for latent fingerprint detection. ChemistrySelect5 (29), 89158923. 10.1002/slct.202000712

  • 778

    Wang Z. Hu S. Bao H. Xing K. Liu J. Xia J. et al (2021b). Immunochromatographic assay based on time-resolved fluorescent nanobeads for the rapid detection of sulfamethazine in egg, honey, and pork. J. Sci. Food Agric.101 (2), 684692. 10.1002/jsfa.10681

  • 779

    Wang Z. Wu X. Liu L. Xu L. Kuang H. Xu C. (2020b). Rapid and sensitive detection of diclazuril in chicken samples using a gold nanoparticle-based lateral-flow strip. Food Chem.312, 126116. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126116

  • 780

    Wang Z. G. Chen R. P. Hou Y. Qin Y. K. Li S. Yang S. P. et al (2022d). DNA hydrogels combined with microfluidic chips for melamine detection. Anal. Chim. Acta.1228, 340312. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340312

  • 781

    Warning L. A. Miandashti A. R. McCarthy L. A. Zhang Q. F. Landes C. F. Link S. (2021). Nanophotonic approaches for chirality sensing. ACS Nano15 (10), 1553815566. 10.1021/acsnano.1c04992

  • 782

    Weetall H. H. (1996). Biosensor technology what? Where? When? And why?Biosens. Bioelectron.11 (1–2), iiv. 10.1016/0956-5663(96)83729-8

  • 783

    Wei S. Cui X. (2021). Synthesis of gold nanoparticles immobilized on fibrous nano‐silica for latent fingerprints detection. J. Porous Mater.28 (3), 751762. 10.1007/s10934-020-01030-8

  • 784

    Wei S. C. Li Y. J. Liang H. H. Yen Y. T. Lin Y. H. Chang H. T. (2022). Photoluminescent carbon nanomaterials for sensing of illicit drugs: focus. Anal. Sci.38 (2), 247260. 10.2116/analsci.21sar06

  • 785

    Wei W. X. Xi Z. Q. Huang Q. L. (2021). Fabrication of SERS-active Au@Au@Ag double shell nanoparticles for low-abundance pigment detection. Chin. J. Chem. Phys.34 (2), 197202. 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2005062

  • 786

    Wen Z. H. Hu X. L. Yan R. F. Wang W. X. Meng H. Song Y. et al (2023). A reliable upconversion nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the highly sensitive determination of olaquindox in fish muscle and water samples. Food Chem.406, 135081. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135081

  • 787

    Wille S. M. R. Elliott S. (2021). The future of analytical and interpretative toxicology: where are we going and how do we get there?J. Anal. Toxicol.45 (7), 619632. 10.1093/jat/bkaa133

  • 788

    Wu B. C. Castagnola E. Cui X. T. (2023). Zwitterionic polymer coated and aptamer functionalized flexible micro-electrode arrays for in vivo cocaine sensing and electrophysiology. Micromachines (Basel).14 (2), 323. 10.3390/mi14020323

  • 789

    Wu H. Gao Y. Yang J. Vai M. Du M. Pun S. (2021a). Development of a photoelectric adjustment system with extended range for fluorescence immunochromatographic assay strip readers. IEEE Photonics J.13 (3), 112. 10.1109/jphot.2021.3075900

  • 790

    Wu J. F. Chen P. P. Chen J. Ye X. X. Cao S. R. Sun C. Q. et al (2022a). Integrated ratiometric fluorescence probe-based acoustofluidic platform for visual detection of anthrax biomarker. Biosens. Bioelectron.214, 114538. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114538

  • 791

    Wu J. F. Zhu Y. J. Liu Y. L. Chen J. Guo L. Xie J. W. (2022b). A novel approach for on-site screening of organophosphorus nerve agents based on DTNB modified AgNPs using surface-enhanced Raman spectrometry. Anal. METHODS14 (43), 42924299. 10.1039/d2ay01307j

  • 792

    Wu K. H. Huang W. C. Chang S. C. Kao C. H. Shyu R. H. (2019). Colloidal silver-based lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of melamine in milk and animal feed. Mater Chem. Phys.231, 121130. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.035

  • 793

    Wu K. H. Huang W. C. Shyu R. H. Chang S. C. (2020a). Silver nanoparticle-base lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of Staphylococcal enterotoxin B in milk and honey. J. Inorg. Biochem.210, 111163. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111163

  • 794

    Wu L. A. Chen Y. C. Pai W. C. Hsu Y. H. Chen Y. F. (2020d). “Plasmonic nanoparticles in agarose gel and filter paper-integrated microfluidic devices for SERS detection of molecules,” in Proc. SPIE 11257, plasmonics in biology and medicine XVII, 1, 1. 10.1117/12.2544360

  • 795

    Wu Q. Yao L. Qin P. Z. Xu J. G. Sun X. Yao B. B. et al (2021b). Time-resolved fluorescent lateral flow strip for easy and rapid quality control of edible oil. Food Chem.357, 129739. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129739

  • 796

    Wu Q. L. Ji C. Zhang L. L. Shi Q. L. Wu Y. G. Tao H. (2022d). A simple sensing platform based on a 1T@2H-MoS2/cMWCNTs composite modified electrode for ultrasensitive detection of illegal Sudan I dye in food samples. Anal. METHODS14 (5), 549559. 10.1039/d1ay01775f

  • 797

    Wu T. Li J. X. Zheng S. Yu Q. Qi K. Z. Shao Y. et al (2022c). Magnetic nanotag-based colorimetric/SERS dual-readout immunochromatography for ultrasensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride and ractopamine in food samples. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (9), 709. 10.3390/bios12090709

  • 798

    Wu W. H. Sui S. H. Li J. Zong L. Li D. Xiao Y. H. et al (2020b). A fluorescent probe bearing two reactive groups discriminates between fluoride-containing G series and sulfur-containing V series nerve agents. ANALYST145 (16), 54255429. 10.1039/d0an00878h

  • 799

    Wu W. L. Yang S. Y. Liu J. L. Mi J. F. Dou L. N. Pan Y. T. et al (2020c). Progress in immunoassays for nitrofurans detection. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 907926. 10.1080/09540105.2020.1786672

  • 800

    Wu Z. F. Zhou H. Han Q. J. Lin X. L. Han D. X. Li X. (2020e). A cost-effective fluorescence biosensor for cocaine based on a “mix-and-detect” strategy. ANALYST.145 (13), 46644670. 10.1039/d0an00675k

  • 801

    Xiao J. X. Wei N. N. Wu S. M. Li H. M. Yin X. Y. Si Y. et al (2022). The simultaneous detection of multiple antibiotics in milk and pork based on an antibody chip biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (8), 578. 10.3390/bios12080578

  • 802

    Xie H. Y. Chen C. R. Lie J. S. You R. Y. Qian W. Lin S. et al (2022c). Sensitive and selective detection of clenbuterol in meat samples by a graphene quantum dot fluorescent probe based on cationic-etherified starch. NANOMATERIALS12 (4), 691. 10.3390/nano12040691

  • 803

    Xie L. P. Zeng H. Zhu J. X. Zhang Z. L. Sun H. B. Xia W. et al (2022a). State of the art in flexible SERS sensors toward label-free and onsite detection: from design to applications. Nano Res.15 (5), 43744394. 10.1007/s12274-021-4017-4

  • 804

    Xie S. Z. Wang H. R. Li N. N. Liu Y. L. Wu J. F. Xu Y. N. et al (2022b). A gold coating nanoporous anodized alumina oxide membrane as the substrate for rapid surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of conjugated cyanide in fingertip blood. Microchem. J.183, 108107. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108107

  • 805

    Xie Y. Wu S. H. Chen Z. M. Jiang J. Z. Sun J. J. (2022d). Rapid nanomolar detection of methamphetamine in biofluids via a reagentless electrochemical aptamer-based biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta1207, 339742. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339742

  • 806

    Xie Z. P. Yang M. F. Luo L. Lv Y. P. Song K. J. Liu S. M. et al (2020). Nanochannel sensor for sensitive and selective adamantanamine detection based on host-guest competition. Talanta.219, 121213. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121213

  • 807

    Xiong J. C. Qin L. Q. Zhang H. X. Zhang S. He S. Xu Y. L. et al (2022a). Sensitive and simultaneous detection of ractopamine and salbutamol using multiplex lateral flow immunoassay based on polyethyleneimine-mediated SiO2@QDs nanocomposites: comparison and application. Microchem. J.181, 107730. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107730

  • 808

    Xiong J. C. Zhang H. X. Qin L. Q. Zhang S. Cao J. Y. Jiang H. Y. (2022b). Magnetic fluorescent quantum dots nanocomposites in food contaminants analysis: current challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (8), 4088. 10.3390/ijms23084088

  • 809

    Xiu L. Li N. Runhao Z. Penggang Y. Chenmeng Z. Yang N. et al (2021). Carbon-based SERS biosensor: from substrate design to sensing and bioapplication. NPG Asia Mater13 (1), 8. 10.1038/s41427-020-00278-5

  • 810

    Xu H. Zhang H. Wang C. Y. Chen K. Liu G. H. Tan C. X. et al (2021). A highly selective and sensitive “off-on” fluorescent probe for the detection of nerve agent mimic DCNP in solution and vapor phase. DYES PIGMENTS.186, 109007. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109007

  • 811

    Xu H. Zhang H. Zhao L. Peng C. Liu G. H. Cheng T. Y. (2020). A naphthalimide-based fluorescent probe for the highly sensitive and selective detection of nerve agent mimic DCP in solution and vapor phase. NEW J. Chem.44 (25), 1071310718. 10.1039/d0nj00416b

  • 812

    Xu S. Zhang G. Fang B. Xiong Q. Duan H. Lai W. (2019). Lateral flow immunoassay based on polydopamine-coated gold nanoparticles for the sensitive detection of zearalenone in maize. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces11 (34), 3128331290. 10.1021/acsami.9b08789

  • 813

    Xu X. Q. Wang W. Q. Lu L. Zhang J. Z. Luo J. (2022). Magnesium oxide nanotube as a promising material for detection of methamphetamine drug: theoretical study. J. Mol. Model.28 (6), 150. 10.1007/s00894-022-05151-6

  • 814

    Xue M. J. Wei X. Z. Feng W. Xing Z. F. Liu S. L. Song Q. H. (2021). Sensitive and selective detections of mustard gas and its analogues by 4-mercaptocoumarins as fluorescent chemosensors in both solutions and gas phase. J. Hazard Mater15, 416. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125789

  • 815

    Yan K. Wang L. C. Zhu Z. H. Duan S. Q. Hua Z. D. Xu P. et al (2023). Cucurbituril-protected dual-readout gold nanoclusters for sensitive fentanyl detection. ANALYST.148 (6), 12531258. 10.1039/d2an01748b

  • 816

    Yan Y. Zhang J. Yi S. Liu L. Huang C. (2021). Lighting up forensic science by aggregation-induced emission: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta1155, 238119. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.051

  • 817

    Yan Y. B. Jiang L. Zhang S. Shen X. T. Huang C. X. (2022). Specific “light-up” sensor made easy: an aggregation induced emission monomer for molecular imprinting. Biosens. Bioelectron.205, 114113. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114113

  • 818

    Yáñez-Sedeño P. Agüí L. Campuzano S. Pingarrón J. M. (2019). What electrochemical biosensors can do for forensic science? Unique features and applications. Biosens. (Basel).9 (4), 127. 10.3390/bios9040127

  • 819

    Yang F. W. Wang C. Yu H. Guo Y. H. Cheng Y. L. Yao W. R. et al (2022b). Establishment of the thin-layer chromatography-surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics method for simultaneous identification of eleven illegal drugs in anti-rheumatic health food. Food Biosci.49, 101842. 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101842

  • 820

    Yang G. Zhang J. Gu L. Tang Y. Zhang X. Huang X. et al (2023a). Ratiometric fluorescence immunoassay based on carbon quantum dots for sensitive detection of malachite green in fish. Biosens. (Basel).13 (1), 38. 10.3390/bios13010038

  • 821

    Yang H. Gun X. Y. Pang G. H. Zheng Z. X. Li C. B. Yang C. et al (2021b). Femtosecond laser patterned superhydrophobic/hydrophobic SERS sensors for rapid positioning ultratrace detection. Opt. Express29 (11), 1690416913. 10.1364/oe.423789

  • 822

    Yang H. W. Lu F. N. Zhan X. X. Tian M. C. Yuan Z. Q. Lu C. (2020b). A Eu3+ - inspired fluorescent carbon nanodot probe for the sensitive visualization of anthrax biomarker by integrating EDTA chelation. Talanta208, 120368. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120368

  • 823

    Yang J. He D. T. Zhang N. Hu C. G. (2022d). Disposable carbon nanotube-based antifouling electrochemical sensors for detection of morphine in unprocessed coffee and milk. J. Electroanal. Chem.905, 115997. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115997

  • 824

    Yang L. Ren Z. Zhang M. Song Y. Li P. Qiu Y. et al (2021a). Three-dimensional porous SERS powder for sensitive liquid and gas detections fabricated by engineering dense “hot spots” on silica aerogel. Nanoscale Adv.3 (4), 10121018. 10.1039/d0na00849d

  • 825

    Yang W. Y. Ou Q. H. Li C. Y. Cheng M. M. Li W. J. Liu Y. K. (2022a). Ultrasensitive flower-like TiO2/Ag substrate for SERS detection of pigments and melamine. RSC Adv.12 (12), 69586965. 10.1039/d1ra08128d

  • 826

    Yang X. X. Guo Y. Z. Liang S. Hou S. Y. Chu T. T. Ma J. L. et al (2020a). Preparation of sulfur-doped carbon quantum dots from lignin as a sensor to detect Sudan I in an acidic environment. J. Mater Chem. B8 (47), 1078810796. 10.1039/d0tb00125b

  • 827

    Yang Y. P. Sun A. L. Eslami M. (2021c). A density functional theory study on detection of amphetamine drug by silicon carbide nanotubes. Phys. E-LOW-DIMENSIONAL Syst. and NANOSTRUCTURES125, 114411. 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114411

  • 828

    Yang Z. C. Ma C. Q. Gu J. Wu Y. M. Zhu C. Li L. et al (2022c). SERS detection of benzoic acid in milk by using Ag-cof SERS substrate. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.267, 120534. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120534

  • 829

    Yang Z. C. Ma C. Q. Gu J. Wu Y. M. Zhu C. Li L. et al (2023b). Detection of melamine by using carboxyl-functionalized Ag-COF as a novel SERS substrate. Food Chem., 401. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134078

  • 830

    Yao H. F. Dong X. X. Xiong H. Liu J. W. Zhou J. Ye Y. (2022a). Functional cotton fabric-based TLC-SERS matrix for rapid and sensitive detection of mixed dyes. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.280, 121464. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121464

  • 831

    Yao W. X. Wang B. J. Wu Y. Z. Wang J. Y. Xu Z. S. Meng F. W. et al (2022b). Rapid determination of methamphetamine and cocaine in saliva by portable surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Anal. Lett.55 (18), 29442953. 10.1080/00032719.2022.2080839

  • 832

    Yao W. Y. Shi J. Ling J. Guo Y. D. Ding C. S. Ding Y. J. (2020). SiC-functionalized fluorescent aptasensor for determination of Proteus mirabilis. Microchim. ACTA187 (7), 406. 10.1007/s00604-020-04378-5

  • 833

    Ye J. F. Wang S. Zhang Y. J. Li B. Y. Lu M. J. Qi X. H. et al (2021). Surface-enhanced shifted excitation Raman difference spectroscopy for trace detection of fentanyl in beverages. Appl. Opt.60 (8), 23542361. 10.1364/ao.418579

  • 834

    Ye Z. L. Yao H. F. Zhang Y. Su A. L. Sun D. Ye Y. et al (2023). Pretreatment-free, on-site separation and sensitive identification of methamphetamine in biological specimens by SERS-active hydrogel microbeads. Anal. Chim. Acta1263, 341285. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341285

  • 835

    Yeasmin S. Ammanath G. Onder A. Yan E. V. L. Yildiz U. H. Palaniappan A. et al (2022). Current trends and challenges in point-of-care urinalysis of biomarkers in trace amounts. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.157, 116786. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116786

  • 836

    Yen Y. T. Chang Y. J. Tseng Y. T. Chen C. Y. Liu Y. L. Chang H. T. (2022a). Screening of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal mixtures using 1-dodecanethiol-gold nanoclusters. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL353, 131151. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131151

  • 837

    Yen Y. T. Lin Y. S. Chang Y. J. Li M. T. Chyueh S. C. Chang H. T. (2022b). Nanomaterial-based sensor arrays with deep learning for screening of illicit drugs. Adv. Mater Technol.7 (11). 10.1002/admt.202200243

  • 838

    Yen Y. T. Lin Y. S. Chen T. H. Chyueh S. C. Chang H. T. (2020). A carbon-dot sensing probe for screening of date rape drugs: nitro-containing benzodiazepines. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL305, 127441. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127441

  • 839

    Yen Y. T. Tseng S. H. Deng-Ying H. Tsai Y. S. Li-Wen L. Pei-Lin C. et al (2022c). Identification of a novel norketamine precursor from seized powders: 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-nitrocyclohexanone. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)333, 111241. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111241

  • 840

    Yi K. Y. Zhang L. (2021). Designed Eu(III)-functionalized nanoscale MOF probe based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer for the reversible sensing of trace Malachite green. Food Chem.354, 129584. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129584

  • 841

    Yildirim M. Ş. Akçan R. Aras S. Tamer U. Evran E. Taştekin B. et al (2023). Overcoming obstacles: analysis of blood and semen stains washed with different chemicals with ATR-FTIR. Forensic Sci. Int.344, 111607. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111607

  • 842

    Yoo J. Kim D. Yang H. Lee M. Kim S. O. Ko H. J. et al (2022). Olfactory receptor-based CNT-FET sensor for the detection of DMMP as a simulant of sarin. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL354, 131188. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131188

  • 843

    You W. Zhao Y. B. Xu S. L. Tian S. S. (2021). Visualization of latent fingermarks on fabric using multi-metal deposition (MMD)—a preliminary study. Forensic Sci. Int.327, 110981. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110981

  • 844

    Yu B. J. Liu S. D. Xie W. H. Pan P. P. Zhou P. Zou Y. D. et al (2022b). Versatile core-shell magnetic fluorescent mesoporous microspheres for multilevel latent fingerprints magneto-optic information recognition. INFOMAT4 (5). 10.1002/inf2.12289

  • 845

    Yu B. J. Liu S. D. Zou Y. D. Deng Y. H. Yue Q. (2023a). Rough surface enhanced interfacial synthesis of core-shell magnetic fluorescent microspheres for enhanced latent fingerprint visualization. Adv. Mater Interfaces10 (8). 10.1002/admi.202202479

  • 846

    Yu J. Gai Z. X. Cheng J. Y. Tian F. Wei W. Li Y. et al (2023c). Construction of beta-cyclodextrin modified holographic sensor for the determination of ibuprofen in plasma and urine. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL385, 133650. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133650

  • 847

    Yu J. Wu J. E. Yang H. Li P. Liu J. Wang M. et al (2022c). Extremely sensitive SERS sensors based on a femtosecond laser-fabricated superhydrophobic/-philic microporous platform. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14 (38), 4387743885. 10.1021/acsami.2c10381

  • 848

    Yu M. D. Chang Q. Zhang L. L. Huang Z. H. Song C. X. Chen Y. et al (2022a). Ultra-sensitive detecting OPs-isocarbophos using photoinduced regeneration of aptamer-based electrochemical sensors. Electroanalysis34 (6), 9951000. 10.1002/elan.202100222

  • 849

    Yu Y. He Z. Lee A. A. M. Gao J. Tan S. C. L. Goh W. P. et al (2023b). Electrochemiluminescence drug detection with nanoparticle-encapsulated luminophore on screen-printed electrodes. Mater Today Chem.29, 101442. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101442

  • 850

    Yuan C. J. Li M. Wang M. Zhang X. M. Yin Z. H. Song K. B. et al (2020). Sensitive development of latent fingerprints using Rhodamine B-diatomaceous earth composites and principle of efficient image enhancement behind their fluorescence characteristics. Chem. Eng. J.383, 123076. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123076

  • 851

    Yuan C. J. Wang M. Li M. Sun P. R. Gao R. X. Tang J. H. (2022a). Construction, mechanism, and forensic application of green-light- excited fluorescent carbon dots/diatomite composites. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.10, 1429414308. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04516

  • 852

    Yuan Y. B. Chen N. Wang L. Y. Zhang X. D. Chen H. Ma P. (2022b). Rapid detection of illegally added nifedipine in Chinese traditional patent medicine by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Sci.38 (2), 359368. 10.2116/analsci.21p148

  • 853

    Zamani R. Yamini Y. (2023). On-Chip electromembrane surrounded solid phase microextraction for determination of tricyclic antidepressants from biological fluids using poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)—graphene oxide nanocomposite as a fiber coating. Biosens. (Basel).13 (1), 139. 10.3390/bios13010139

  • 854

    Zamanian J. Khoshbin Z. Hosseinzadeh H. Danesh N. M. Abdolabadi A. K. Abnous K. et al (2022). An ultrasensitive detection platform for cocaine: aptasensing strategy in capillary tube. Front. Chem.10, 996358. 10.3389/fchem.2022.996358

  • 855

    Zanfrognini B. Pigani L. Zanardi C. (2020). Recent advances in the direct electrochemical detection of drugs of abuse. J. SOLID STATE Electrochem.24 (11–12), 26032616. 10.1007/s10008-020-04686-z

  • 856

    Zhang B. Hou X. Wang A. X. (2021e). “Point-of-Care SERS sensing of illicit drug residue using in-situ growth silver nanoparticles on diatomaceous photonic crystals,” in 2021 conference on lasers and electro-optics, CLEO 2021 - proceedings.

  • 857

    Zhang B. X. Hou X. W. Zhen C. Wang A. X. (2021d). Sub-part-per-billion level sensing of fentanyl residues from wastewater using portable surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensing. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (10), 370. 10.3390/bios11100370

  • 858

    Zhang C. Fan Z. N. Zhan H. Zhou H. Ma R. L. Fan L. J. (2021c). Fluorescent cationic conjugated polymer-based adaptive developing strategy for both sebaceous and blood fingerprints. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces13 (23), 2741927429. 10.1021/acsami.1c04741

  • 859

    Zhang C. Yu X. X. Shi X. M. Han Y. F. Guo Z. M. Liu Y. (2020d). Development of carbon quantum dot-labeled antibody fluorescence immunoassays for the detection of morphine in hot pot soup base. Food Anal. Methods13 (5), 10421049. 10.1007/s12161-020-01700-y

  • 860

    Zhang D. J. You H. J. Zhang L. L. Fang J. X. (2020g). Facile surface modification of mesoporous Au nanoparticles for highly sensitive SERS detection. Anal. Chem.92 (23), 1537915387. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02781

  • 861

    Zhang G. H. Zou X. Y. Li H. He Y. (2021a). Visual colorimetric detection of triacetone triperoxide based on a Fe(ii)-promoted thermal decomposition process. ANALYST.146 (20), 61876192. 10.1039/d1an01480c

  • 862

    Zhang J. Hu S. Du Y. Cao D. Wang G. R. Yuan Z. Q. (2020b). Improved food additive analysis by ever-increasing nanotechnology. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 623641. 10.38212/2224-6614.1152

  • 863

    Zhang M. Li M. Zhao Y. Xu N. Peng L. Wang Y. et al (2021b). Novel monoclonal antibody-sandwich immunochromatographic assay based on Fe3O4/Au nanoparticles for rapid detection of fish allergen parvalbumin. Food Res. Int.142, 110102. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110102

  • 864

    Zhang M. Yu Q. Guo J. Wu B. Kong X. (2022a). Review of thin-layer chromatography tandem with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detection of analytes in mixture samples. Biosens. (Basel).12 (11), 937. 10.3390/bios12110937

  • 865

    Zhang R. L. Ren Y. M. Zhang Q. Y. Huang W. X. Bai H. P. Zeng X. F. (2022f). Water-soluble pillar[5]arene-modified graphdiyne functional material and its application towards ultrasensitive and robust electrochemical methylamphetamine determination. NEW J. Chem.46 (43), 2090920917. 10.1039/d2nj03668a

  • 866

    Zhang S. W. Sun Y. Y. Sun Y. M. Wang H. Li Z. F. Xu Z. L. (2020c). Visual upconversion nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the semi-quantitative detection of sibutramine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (29), 81358144. 10.1007/s00216-020-02944-7

  • 867

    Zhang T. Wu L. Pei J. Li X. Li H. Inscore F. (2022b). Part-per-billion level chemical sensing with a gold-based SERS-active substrate. Sensors22 (5), 1778. 10.3390/s22051778

  • 868

    Zhang T. S. Hu X. Y. Zu B. Y. Dou X. C. (2022c). A march to shape optical artificial olfactory system toward ultrasensitive detection of improvised explosives. Adv. Photonics Res.3 (7). 10.1002/adpr.202200006

  • 869

    Zhang T. T. Pei J. C. Li X. F. Li H. W. Inscore F. (2022g). A surface-enhanced Raman sensor for trace identification and analysis of high-priority drugs of abuse with portable and handheld Raman devices. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.53 (9), 14941514. 10.1002/jrs.6410

  • 870

    Zhang W. Q. Ling J. Wen D. Cheng Z. J. Wang S. P. Ding Y. J. (2022h). Simultaneous detection of acute myocardial infarction-related miR-199a and miR-499 based on a dual-emission CdTe fluorescent probe and T7 exonuclease-assisted signal amplification. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL371, 132484. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132484

  • 871

    Zhang X. Wang J. Liang J. H. Liu Z. W. Shen X. Liu Y. J. et al (2022e). A novel self-aggregated gold nanoparticles based on sensitive immunochromatographic assays for highly detection of opium poppy in herbal teas. Food Chem.390, 133188. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133188

  • 872

    Zhang Y. Li S. Peng T. Zheng P. Wang Z. Ling Z. et al (2020e). One-step icELISA developed with novel antibody for rapid and specific detection of diclazuril residue in animal-origin foods. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess.37 (10), 16331639. 10.1080/19440049.2020.1787527

  • 873

    Zhang Y. Li T. T. Zhang Y. J. Sun X. H. Liu H. Y. Wang Y. A. et al (2022d). Acetylcholinesterase-capped mesoporous silica gated switches for selective detection of high-toxicity organophosphate compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta.1207, 339708. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339708

  • 874

    Zhang Y. Liu Q. Chong-Bo M. Wang Q. Yang M. Du Y. (2020a). Point-of-care assay for drunken driving with Pd@Pt core-shell nanoparticles-decorated ploy(vinyl alcohol) aerogel assisted by portable pressure meter. Theranostics10 (11), 50645073. 10.7150/thno.42601

  • 875

    Zhang Y. Yan B. (2020). A novel cucurbit[7]uril anchored bis-functionalized metal-organic framework hybrid and its potential use in fluorescent analysis of illegal stimulants in saliva. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL324, 128656. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128656

  • 876

    Zhao F. F. Zhang T. Y. Yang Y. C. L. (2020a). A facile synthesis of multifunctional carbon dots as fluorescence “turn on” and “turn off” probes for selective detection of Al3+ and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol. LUMINESCENCE.35 (8), 12771285. 10.1002/bio.3889

  • 877

    Zhao J. Y. Qin M. L. You J. W. Liu K. Ding L. P. Liu T. H. et al (2022a). Rapid and colorimetric evaluation of G-series nerve agents and simulants using the squaraine-ethanolamine adducts. DYES PIGMENTS.197, 109870. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109870

  • 878

    Zhao L. Y. Yang R. Q. Wei Y. Guo Y. J. Zhao Q. Zhang H. W. et al (2022d). Rapid and sensitive SERS detection of opioids in solutions based on the solid chip Au-coated Si nano-cone array. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.283, 121720. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121720

  • 879

    Zhao S. Q. Chen X. J. Huang J. W. Zhang X. N. Sun J. L. Yang L. (2022c). Point-of-care testing of methylamphetamine with a portable optical fiber immunosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta.1192, 339345. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339345

  • 880

    Zhao Y. Jing X. H. Zheng F. J. Liu Y. M. Fan Y. (2021). Surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active plasmonic metal nanoparticle-persistent luminescence material composite films for multiple illegal dye detection. Anal. Chem.93 (25), 89458953. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01442

  • 881

    Zhao Y. L. Chen Q. Lv J. Xu M. M. Zhang X. Li J. R. (2022b). Specific sensing of antibiotics with metal-organic frameworks based dual sensor system. Nano Res.15 (7), 64306437. 10.1007/s12274-022-4306-6

  • 882

    Zhao Z. X. Shen J. W. Wang M. (2020b). Simultaneous imaging of latent fingerprint and quantification of nicotine residue by NaYF4:Yb/Tm upconversion nanoparticles. Nanotechnology31 (14), 145504. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab647c

  • 883

    Zhou C. Y. Ma J. Sun D. W. (2023). Grouping illuminants by aggregation-induced emission (AIE) mechanisms for designing sensing platforms for food quality and safety inspection. Trends Food Sci. Technol.134, 232246. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.002

  • 884

    Zhou H. F. Wu D. T. Cai W. R. (2022d). Carbon nanotubes coated with hybrid nanocarbon layers for electrochemical sensing of psychoactive drug. Electrochim Acta430, 141001. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141001

  • 885

    Zhou J. J. Gui Y. Lv X. Q. He J. L. Xie F. Li J. J. et al (2022c). Nanomaterial-based fluorescent biosensor for food safety analysis. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (12), 1072. 10.3390/bios12121072

  • 886

    Zhou J. J. Lv X. Q. Jia J. L. Din Z. U. Cai S. Q. He J. L. et al (2022a). Nanomaterials-based electrochemiluminescence biosensors for food analysis: recent developments and future directions. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (11), 1046. 10.3390/bios12111046

  • 887

    Zhou S. Kuang H. Liu L. (2020). Development of an ic-ELISA and colloidal gold strip for the detection of the beta-blocker carazolol. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 217230. 10.1080/09540105.2019.1710113

  • 888

    Zhou S. Y. Xu X. X. Wang L. Guo L. L. Liu L. Q. Kuang H. et al (2021). A fluorescence based immunochromatographic sensor for monitoring chlorpheniramine and its comparison with a gold nanoparticle-based lateral-flow strip. ANALYST.146 (11), 35893598. 10.1039/d1an00423a

  • 889

    Zhou Y. Wang T. T. Yan L. T. Zhang G. M. Zhang Y. Zhang C. H. et al (2022b). A sensitive electrochemical analysis method of ractopamine based on Janus particles. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.50 (3), 100056. 10.1016/j.cjac.2022.100056

  • 890

    Zhu A. N. Xuan T. Zhai Y. Wu Y. P. Guo X. Y. Ying Y. et al (2021). Preparation of magnetic metal organic framework: a magnetically induced improvement effect for detection of parathion-methyl. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL339, 129909. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129909

  • 891

    Zhu C. Q. Li X. Wang X. X. Su H. Y. Ma C. F. Guo X. et al (2022b). Ultrasensitive methyl salicylate gas sensing determined by Pd-doped SnO2. Front. Mater Sci.16 (4), 220625. 10.1007/s11706-022-0625-5

  • 892

    Zhu Q. Q. Wang W. Kong W. G. Chao X. K. Bi Y. Y. Li Z. H. (2022c). Metal formate framework-assisted solid fluorescent material based on carbonized nanoparticles for the detection of latent fingerprints. Anal. Chim. Acta.1209, 339864. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339864

  • 893

    Zhu W. Wen B. Y. Jie L. J. Tian X. D. Yang Z. L. Radjenovic P. M. et al (2020). Rapid and low-cost quantitative detection of creatinine in human urine with a portable Raman spectrometer. Biosens. Bioelectron.154, 112067. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112067

  • 894

    Zhu Y. J. He J. Wang Q. Y. Chen A. D. Aa J. Wang G. J. (2022a). Accurate biodetection of trace uranium by electrochemiluminescence and its application inin vivo toxicokinetic dynamic research. Biosens. Bioelectron.215, 114489. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114489

  • 895

    Zhuang L. Gong J. Ji Y. Tian P. Kong F. Bai H. et al (2020). Lateral flow fluorescent immunoassay based on isothermal amplification for rapid quantitative detection of Salmonella spp. Analyst145 (6), 23672377. 10.1039/c9an02011j

  • 896

    Zimmerman N. Li H. Z. Ellis A. Hauryliuk A. Robinson E. S. Gu P. et al (2020). Improving correlations between land use and air pollutant concentrations using wavelet analysis: insights from a low-cost sensor network. Aerosol Air Qual. Res.20 (2), 314328. 10.4209/aaqr.2019.03.0124

  • 897

    Zinna J. Lockwood T. L. E. Lieberman M. (2020). Enzyme-based paper test for detection of lactose in illicit drugs. Anal. METHODS12 (8), 10771084. 10.1039/c9ay02459j

  • 898

    Zou F. Y. Fu K. X. Jin C. Li M. Zhang G. L. Zhang R. L. et al (2022b). Microwave-prepared surface imprinted magnetic nanoparticles based electrochemical sensor for adsorption and determination of ketamine in sewage. Anal. Chim. Acta1217, 340025. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340025

  • 899

    Zou R. Yu Y. Pan H. R. Zhang P. S. Cheng F. M. Zhang C. H. et al (2022a). Cross-linking induced emission of polymer micelles for high-contrast visualization level 3 details of latent fingerprints. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14 (14), 1674616754. 10.1021/acsami.2c02563

  • 900

    Zubrycka A. Kwasanica A. Haczkiewicz M. Sipa K. Rudnicki K. Skrzypek S. et al (2022). Illicit drugs street samples and their cutting agents. The result of the GC-MS based profiling define the guidelines for sensors development. Talanta237, 122904. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122904

Summary

Keywords

systematic review, combating crime, sensor (or biosensor), point-of-care detection, low-cost sensors, illicit drug detection, body fluid analysis, food safety analysis

Citation

Cozens AE, Johnson SD and Lee T-C (2025) A systematic review of sensors to combat crime and routes to further sensor development. Front. Chem. 13:1568867. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1568867

Received

30 January 2025

Accepted

05 May 2025

Published

12 June 2025

Volume

13 - 2025

Edited by

Tony D. James, University of Bath, United Kingdom

Reviewed by

Chusen Huang, Shanghai Normal University, China

Shi Gang Liu, Hunan Agricultural University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Alice E. Cozens, Tung-Chun Lee,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics