Abstract
Forensic science plays an important part in crime reduction but faces many challenges. These include the validity, cost and complexity of current sensors used, and a reliance on trained professionals to conduct analyses. Recent advances in sensor technologies present a promising opportunity for rapid, decentralized, and cost-effective analysis by untrained individuals in the field. To date, a comprehensive systematic review covering sensing technologies and use cases has been lacking. This paper addresses that gap. After the initial screening of papers, 1,482 publications were included in the review, from which data on target analytes and sensing technologies were extracted. Given that law enforcement have limited resources, a second screening examined papers that focused on low-cost sensing devices published from 2020 onwards (N = 791). Overall, our review identified eleven key analyte categories that had been researched: illicit drugs, fingerprints, explosives, body fluids, food safety, poisons and toxins, pollutants, counterfeits and documentation, fire, gunshot, and others. Low-cost sensing technologies identified were categorised into electrochemical, colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and SERS. We review trends in the research reported, barriers to commercialisation and adoption, and review the use of these types of sensors by law enforcement agencies. Current sensors used by authorities face challenges of high costs, specificity issues, limited detection capabilities and complex sample preparation. Emerging research focuses on cost-effective printed electrodes and dual detection techniques to enhance analyte sensitivity and detection accuracy. Notably, body fluid analysis plays a crucial role in criminal cases, but current sensors suffer issues like false positives, DNA degradation, and high costs. Studies investigating eco-friendly materials and dual-detection approaches show promise in addressing these issues. Illicit drug analysis constitutes over one-third (36%) of included publications. In the UK, police rely on NIK tests and DrugWipe sensors for on-site drug detection, but challenges related to sensitivity, specificity, and confirmatory testing persist. Ongoing research explores dual detection methods, lateral flow immunoassays, and electro-chemiluminescent screening to enhance specificity and matrix tolerance. Future efforts should prioritise refining dual detection methods, reducing matrix interference, low-cost/eco-friendly materials and fostering collaboration between academia and law enforcement for effective implementation in these areas.
1 Introduction
Forensic science plays an important role in the detection and prosecution of crime. It draws on a variety of scientific disciplines and approaches (Bollella and Katz, 2020; Pereira de Oliveira et al., 2018), and can involve the analysis of biological fluids, illicit drug samples, gunshot residues and so on. While valuable, traditional technologies presently employed have problems to include damaging effects on DNA retrieval, unacceptable specificity, and the inability to perform concurrent analyses as part of a multiplex assay (Gooch et al., 2014). The utilisation of sensors, particularly biosensors, represents a considerable opportunity (Singh et al., 2014). Numerous forensic analysis methods use presumptive analysis (i.e., they are not confirmatory) and necessitate collected samples to be centrally analysed in a laboratory to meet evidential requirements. However, sensors may enable untrained persons to undertake rapid, decentralised (and less expensive) analyses of complex samples in the field (Bollella and Katz, 2020). Biosensors have been well developed in the healthcare sector, food and beverage industries and environmental monitoring fields (Chadha et al., 2022). However, even though their use may offer sensitive, user-friendly, selective and rapid on-site tools for analysis, in the context of forensic science, biosensors are relatively under-developed (Aydindogan et al., 2019; Geng et al., 2017; Yáñez-Sedeño et al., 2019).
In this article, we report a systematic review to take stock of the current uses of biosensors and to identify key areas for future research. We begin by explaining why sensors are important in this context and specify what defines a sensor and the key elements of the sensor we will be focussing on (target analytes and sensing technologies). We then discuss the approach taken to review the literature, detailing why a systematic approach was taken, present our findings, and then make suggestions for future work.
1.1 Investigating crime
To detect and investigate crime, illegal behaviour must be identified, and an understanding and reconstruction of the crime event possible. To do this, for many forms of crime, a coherent analysis of physical and other evidence is needed. This is termed forensic science (Chisum and Turvey, 2011). Recent legal and scientific advances have emphasised concerns over the validity of inferences and techniques used in forensic science. Validity is crucial as scientific inaccuracies have consequences for the criminal justice system, crime reduction and society. The reconstruction of a crime relies strongly on Locard’s Exchange Principle, that every contact leaves a trace (Locard, 1920). Other situations necessitate on-site detection at the time of a crime; for instance, roadside drug testing mandates that a trace of drug sample be identified immediately. Therefore, methods for analysis and identification of these traces are needed. Sensors are utilised already in many scenarios dealing with traces (target analytes) to detect crime. However, improved validity and increased capacity are needed. Sensors may help to deliver both.
1.2 Sensors
A sensor is defined as “a device which detects and measures a physical property and records, indicates, or otherwise responds to it” (Soanes and Stevenson, 2008). This can be anything from thermometers, accelerometer sensors to alcohol sensors.
1.2.1 Biosensors
Due to recent advances in their development, one branch of sensors that is of particular importance to combating crime are biosensors (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018). Developments are mainly due to the utilisation of new nanomaterials and nanostructured devices (Harish et al., 2022), developments in microfabrication and miniaturisation technologies (Baracu and Gugoasa, 2021), new bio-recognition molecules (Bazin et al., 2017) and improved collaboration between life- and physical-scientists (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018).
Biosensor design incorporates three main stages. First, the biosensor must identify a specific analyte using a specific recognition component (bioreceptor–e.g., nuclei acids, proteins or other biological structures) that binds to the target analyte (Weetall, 1996). Bioreceptors are immobilized on a transducer surface to ensure specific detection. Novel bioreceptors are currently under development to replace traditional antibody-based methods. Notably, aptamers—such as peptide aptamers and oligonucleotide aptamers, comprised of single-stranded DNA or RNA—are emerging as promising alternatives (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018).
Second, the biological binding event must be converted into a physicochemical signal. Transducers translate this biological signal into a quantifiable one, which can be mechanical (force, pressure, displacement, acceleration), optical (light intensity, refractive index) or electrical (current, potential). Once transduced the signal can be processed (filtering, amplification) and transformed into pertinent chemical data (the third stage in the process).
1.3 Target analytes
An analyte is a substance whose chemical constituents are to be identified or measured (Soanes and Stevenson, 2008). Understanding current and future sensor applications for crime reduction requires identifying typical target analytes. This systematic review will categorize common analytes, including illicit drugs, fingerprints, and body fluids. For instance, sensors that detect blood stains at crime scenes can provide evidence such as blood type, DNA, and links to suspects or victims. Fast, low-cost, and reliable sensors are essential, and with advancements in technology comes the ability to detect a greater number of target analytes in smaller quantities (Gove and Durini, 2014).
1.4 Sensing technologies
Once target analytes are identified, suitable sensing technologies must be determined. Lab-based technologies include mass spectrometry using analysis of mass-to-charge-ratios (Gross, 2017), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA amplification (Hue-Roye and Vege, 2008) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for rapid component separation (Kazakevich and Lobrutto, 2007).
Portable, lower cost technologies include electrochemical, colorimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and surface-enhance Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Electrochemical sensors use a recognition element coupled to an electrochemical transducer to give information about chemical composition (Yáñez-Sedeño et al., 2019). Voltammetry, a common electrochemical method, provides advantages over other electrochemical detection methods in portability (Ribeiro et al., 2020), matrix tolerance (Haghighi et al., 2020) and tolerance against potential interferents (Grothe et al., 2021). Colorimetric sensors utilise a specific indicator or reagent that reacts selectively with the target analyte providing a colour change for identification (Suslick et al., 2004). Immunoassays use antibodies or antigens to measure analyte presence or concentration (Diamandis and Christopoulos, 1996). Luminescence, including fluorescence, phosphorescence and chemiluminescence, uses characteristics such as intensity, wavelength and duration of emitted light to provide information about the target analyte (Holliday, 2016). Raman spectroscopy uses the interaction of molecular vibrations with light to provide non-destructive information about crystallinity, chemical structure and molecular interactions (Long, 1977). SERS enhances Raman scattering of molecules when they are adsorbed on or near to a SERS-active surface including nanostructures made from gold or silver (Xiu et al., 2021).
1.4.1 Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials are essential for advancing diagnostic technologies, offering tailored properties in biomaterials (Bollella and Katz, 2020; Kim, 2017). Defined as substances with at least one dimension in the nanometer range (10−9 m), their small size confers unique properties attracting significant research interest due to their low cost (limited materials usage) and uniquely size-dependent properties (Amiri et al., 2021). Recent studies emphasize the role of nanomaterial-based biosensors, especially in electrochemical technologies, in enhancing portable devices by improving biocompatibility, stability, surface energy, and signal amplification (Su et al., 2017). Nano-coatings have also advanced bioreceptor immobilization, preventing non-specific binding (Bhalla et al., 2016). These developments address demands for biosensors with enhanced selectivity, sensitivity, rapid response and low cost (Su et al., 2017). Therefore, future research on crime reducing sensors will likely focus on nanomaterial-based biosensors.
1.5 Low-cost, on-site and performance
To date, devices have been costly and used complex methods which require an expert to undertake analyses. However, given budget constraints in policing and the ubiquity of some problems (e.g., drug driving), the next-generation of sensing devices will increasingly need to prioritise optimal performance during usage and post-storage, as well as being user-friendly and affordable (both in operation and production) (Weetall, 1996).
1.6 Systematic review
To understand advances in the use of sensing technologies to reduce crime and to map out a future research agenda, a systematic review (SR) was conducted. Ad hoc literature reviews present often sparse and biased coverage of an existing literature, whereas SRs are constructed to reduce bias by using transparent and systematic search approaches, enabling the extraction of as great a proportion of the existing evidence as is feasible on a subject (Cockbain et al., 2018). SRs are typically undertaken to gather evidence on “what works” in specific medicine and healthcare scenarios (Curtis and Cairncross, 2003) where data is plentiful. But SRs can also be employed for broader reviews for emerging issues (Blythe and Johnson, 2019; Elgabry et al., 2020), as is the case here.
1.7 Existing literature
Existing literature reviews on target analytes and sensing technologies for combating crime often focus on specific areas without a systematic approach. For instance, Honeychurch’s (Honeychurch, 2019) review on electroanalytical-based techniques for detecting benzodiazepines is detailed but narrow in scope, focussing on a specific analyte and sensing technology.
A 2020 special issue of Biosensors (Bollella and Katz, 2020), “The Potential of (bio)sensors for the Forensic Sciences” highlighted the potential of biosensors in forensic science. The special issue examines the crucial role biosensors can play in efficiently and accurately improving the techniques of crime detection (Bollella and Katz, 2020). However, although this review is broader in its approach than other articles, dealing with many target analytes, the sensing technology considered was limited to electrochemical biosensors.
Therefore, a wider scoped review of analytes and sensing technologies to reduce crime is of clear value to capitalise on recent advances in other sectors (
Parkhey and Mohan, 2018). As far as we are aware, this is the first systematic review to scope all potential target analytes and sensing technologies of a sensor for combating crime. The overarching aims of the review are to understand:
1. What analytes are targeted in sensors for combating crime?
2. What sensing technologies have been used to combat crime?
3. What are the most recent directions of on-site and low-cost sensing devices?
4. What are the possible future avenues for further research?
2 Methodology and design
A SR protocol, developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines (Shamseer et al., 2015), defined the scope of the review and the search strategy (see below). The protocol and search query were reviewed by an academic librarian with expertise in systematic reviews and updated in response to feedback.
2.1 Information sources
Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) identified principle academic search systems used in SRs. Of those identified, the most suitable were: ProQuest, PubMed and Web of Science. Searches focused on the title, abstract and keywords of articles, along with the field tag used (noft, Ti/Ab and TS respectively).
In addition, to find articles that may be missed by this search strategy, a chain citation technique (backward search) and the snowballing (forward search) of key studies identified was used (Cribbin, 2011).
2.2 Search query
To locate articles, a search query was refined, comprising two components: a sensing device concept and a criminal application concept. Before conducting the search, search terms were piloted and refined to achieve a balance between sensitivity (retrieving a high proportion of relevant articles), and precision (retrieving a low proportion of irrelevant articles). Relevant terms and synonyms were used to facilitate a systematic search.
Concept 1:
biosens* OR biomaterial* OR nanomaterial* OR nanoparticle* OR nanotechnolog* OR biotechnology* OR sensor*
Concept 2:
crime* OR criminal* OR offend* OR forensic* OR terror* OR illegal* OR illicit* OR unlawful*
Where the truncation character (*) retrieves variations of the search term, for example, crime* returns articles that include the term crime and crimes.
2.3 Eligibility criteria
The exclusion and inclusion criteria used to sift articles followed the PICOS format (Methley et al., 2014) and were applied at both the title and abstract, and full-text screening stages. The PICOS criteria used were:
Population (P): In contrast to medical studies, the population was less critical. Articles from the last 8 years (13/05/2016–13/05/2023) were considered, as older publications were less likely to be relevant due to rapid advances in sensing technology.
Interventions (I): Included articles focused on current or potential future uses of chemical and biochemical sensing devices to combat crime. Studies on other (sensing) technologies, such as new or emerging computer technologies (e.g., wireless sensor networks, IoT, machine learning), image and sound processing and those examining cyber or data security were excluded.
Outcomes (O): Measured whether the sensing technology could detect a specific target analyte.
Study Types (S): Included peer-reviewed journal articles, government or official documents (legal documents), and academic theses. Excluded were commentaries, books/book reviews, opinions, and working papers. Studies had to be written in English language and journal articles peer-reviewed, with the latter ensuring publications were of sufficient quality (Koshy et al., 2018).
2.4 Study selection
In stage 1, titles and abstracts were screened using the PICOS criteria and the EPPI-Reviewer 4.0 software (Thomas et al., 2010). Figure 1 guided decision making to ensure consistency by the primary reviewer and to assist co-reviewers during an inter-rater reliability (IRR) exercise. To assess IRR, a random sample of 5% of the identified publications were assessed on title and abstract by two other reviewers. Agreement between first reviewer and co-reviewers was measured using the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistic (Elgabry et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2011) (Equation 1), yielding values of 0.81 and 0.84, indicating very good agreement. The primary reviewer subsequently screened the full text of all articles included during stage 1 of the screening process.
FIGURE 1

Schematic of the inclusion decision tree.
2.5 Data extraction and analysis
For each article, we extracted pertinent information, including study identifiers (publication year, author(s), publication type) and outcomes (target analyte, sensing technology, detection method). Following data extraction, findings were synthesised using a thematic analysis (Clarke and Braun, 2017).
2.6 Further exclusion
Following the initial systematic review and summary of core information, a more in-depth study was then performed on a sub-set of included publications. As noted in a special issue of
Biosensors(
Bollella and Katz, 2020) the future of evidence analysis in criminal investigations relies on the development of rapid, decentralised and low-cost testing by untrained individuals. For these reasons and because of the fast pace of research in sensing technologies, a more detailed analysis was carried out. The further eligibility criteria for the second stage were that.
• The publications date was on or after 01/01/2020
• The sensing technology was low-cost (as detailed in Section 1.4)
3 Results and discussion
In the results section, we first present findings from the initial SR screening, examining trends in publication numbers and target analytes identified over the last 8 years. Secondly, our further screening results are presented and discussed, focussing on publications from the last four and a half years that discuss low-cost sensing technologies. Publications are categorised by target analyte addressed with discussions looking at numbers of publications, sensing technologies used, and key themes identified. Current technologies used by law enforcement and local authorities are evaluated, and areas where further research could significantly impact crime reduction, based on SR results, highlighted.
3.1 Initial screening (2016-2023)
Figure 2 shows the number of articles identified, included and excluded at each review stage. The pre-defined search query resulted in 2,504 results from ProQuest, 978 from PubMed and 2,982 from Web of Science, plus 9 from backward searches and 6 from forward searches. Of the 6,479 publications initially identified, 22% were duplicates and removed. Title and abstract screening excluded 67% of the remaining publications, and full-text screening excluded another 12%. Ultimately, 1,482 publications were carried forward for analysis.
FIGURE 2

PRISMA flowchart summarising the inclusion and exclusion steps of the systematic review performed.
There was a year-on-year increase in included publications, from 134 in 2017 to more than double that amount (Ge et al., 2020) in 2022. This growth reflects increased research and development of biosensors (Parkhey and Mohan, 2018), underscoring the need to explore their potential applications for crime reduction.
3.1.1 Eleven target analytes identified
Categorising included publications by target analytes is crucial for understanding current trends in sensing devices and enabling a more systematic analysis. Thematic analysis of the included publications identified eleven identified target analytes:
1. Fire
2. Gunshot
3. Counterfeits and documentation
4. Pollutants (e.g., adulterated fuels, industrial waste)
5. Body fluids (any target analyte that could be found in body fluids e.g., seminal or vaginal fluid, salivary amylase, blood, urine, DNA)
6. Explosives
7. Poisons and toxins (e.g., mycotoxins, pesticides)
8. Fingerprints
9. Food safety (e.g., food poisoning, adulteration)
10. Illicit drugs–As illicit drugs represented a large proportion of the included publications the category was further subdivided [depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, pharmaceuticals, dissociates, cannabinoids and opioids per Target Zero (Author Anonymous, 2025a) Zero1]
11. Other (e.g., radioactive materials, illegal wildlife trade)
Figure 3A shows that the largest volume of included publications (36%) focussed on illicit drugs, followed by food safety (20%), fingerprints (15%) and poisons/toxins (14%). The large proportion of publications in these areas indicates strong research interest and rapid development but also reflects the broad scope of some of these categories. For example, the illicit drugs category is expansive. Additionally, Figure 3A highlights less interest and development in sensors for fire and gunshot analysis.
FIGURE 3

(A) Trends in the percentage of publications relating to each identified target analyte from 2016 to 2023*. Noting that some publications related to multiple target analytes and therefore the total percentage is seen to sum to more than 100%. (B) Trends in percentage of different categories of illicit drug publications identified from 2017 to 2022. Noting that some publications related to multiple target drugs or were not assigned to one of the 7 drug categories and therefore the total percentage is seen not to sum 100%. [*where 2016 and 2023 are not shown as data collection was only for half of these years.].
Over the past 8 years, the proportion of publications for each target analyte has remained fairly constant (Figure 3A). However, publications on fingerprint and poison/toxin detection have decreased, while those on illicit drugs have increased, especially from 2020 to 2022, echoing a growing global concern about substance abuse (United Nations, 2023) and could thus represent an important avenue for further research.
Figure 3B shows that overall about 30% of illicit drug publications focussed on the design of sensors to detect stimulant abuse. Opioid-related publications are seen to have increased rapidly from 2019 onwards. This aligns with the rising opioid crisis and persistent stimulant misuse. According to the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), reported drug use in the US increased by 47% from 2016 to 2022 (Author Anonymous, 2025b), with 13% of Americans starting or increasing substance use to cope with COVID-19 stress (Abramson, 2021). These trends suggest the time critical nature of sensor development in illicit drug detection.
3.1.2 Sensing technologies used
Eight different types of sensing elements were identified within the included publications and were classified as high or low-cost technologies (detailed in Section 1.4). High-cost technologies, requiring expensive equipment and trained professionals, included mass spectrometry (5% of publications), PCR (1%), and HPLC (2%). Low-cost technologies, suitable for use by untrained persons, included electrochemical (27%), colorimetric (11%), immunoassay (18%), luminescence (32%), and SERS (15%).
3.2 Detailed analyses (2020-2023)
After the initial overview, a more in-depth analysis was conducted on articles published from 2020 onwards, focusing on low-cost sensing technologies due to the reasons highlighted in the methods section and the fast-pace of sensor development. A total of 590 publications were excluded as they had a publication date before 01/01/2020 and 110 were excluded due to the high-cost of the technology discussed. This left 782 publications for more detailed analysis.
High- and low-cost technologies are classified based on material costs, instrumentation complexity, expenses, and accessibility. Low-cost methods use inexpensive materials and portable equipment for on-site testing, while high-cost methods require complex preparation, advanced instruments, and specialised operators for centralised labs.
Within the high-cost publications, mass spectrometry accounted for 45% followed by HPLC for 15% (Figure 4). Although these technologies allow accurate analysis [see Chiang et al. (2019)] their expense, requirement of trained users and time intensive nature makes them unsuitable for mass-market production and irrelevant to the rest of this review.
FIGURE 4

Number of publications identified relating to different low-cost sensing technologies (included) and high-cost sensing technologies (excluded).
Low-cost publications comprised 88% of those identified from 2020 onwards, with luminescence and electrochemical technologies being the most prevalent (Figure 4). The literature focus on these technologies indicates that they are at the forefront of work being done in low-cost sensing development.
The subsequent sections discuss the above outlined publications, organised by target analyte (Figure 5). Tables summarise key themes identified in the included publications, categorised by sensing technology. Key themes and publications are explored further within the accompanying text to outline current technologies and potential areas for further research. Alongside the publications reviewed in the SR, an outline of the current sensing technologies used by UK police and authorities is provided. The shortfalls of these technologies are discussed, and the findings from the SR used to suggest the most promising directions for further research to address these issues.
FIGURE 5

Plot showing the number of publications included in the further screening review. The percentage of publications assigned to a sensing technology for each target analyte has been indicated.
3.2.1 Fire
Sensors in fire analysis detect, map and trace fire sources. Only one publication focused on fire, highlighting minimal current interest. The identified publication reviewed metal oxide (MOx) electrochemical sensors (Shalini Devi et al., 2021) for hazard-surveillance and risk investigation, including fire-hazards, chemical-warfare agents, oil-spills and explosives. MOx sensors, combined with airflow detectors and specific algorithms, have been used in mobile robots for fire analysis. These developments are made possible by novel nanoarchitectural patterns which enhance sensitivity and the possibility of multi-analyte sensing using array sensors and blended composites. The authors noted that improving thermal damage prevention, response, recovery times, and robot mobility is necessary to realize the potential of these devices.
In the UK, police and fire services collaborate on-site to determine fire causes, origins and behaviours, collecting evidence such as fire debris and electrical appliances for analysis (Cellmark, 2025a; Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service Fire Investigation FI, 2013). Central laboratories use gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify accelerants, origin and fire behaviour (Abel et al., 2018). Fire investigation dogs are used to pinpoint traces of potential accelerants (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021) and thermal imaging cameras to identify hotspots and origins (Police Law Enforcement Solutions, 2018).
Current issues include the portability of GC-MS and the lack of specificity of canine detection. On-site detection is necessary to reduce delays caused by evidence backlogs (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021). Whilst portable GC-MS shows promise, further research is needed to confirm field accuracy (Forensic Technology Center of Excellence, 2021). Research into portable MOx sensors (Shalini Devi et al., 2021) offers a rapid alternative to central laboratory GC-MS testing and increased specificity over canine units.
3.2.2 Gunshot
For gunshot analysis, sensors help identify gunshot residue (GSR) on suspects or at a crime scene. Only 11 publications focussed on gunshot analysis, with electrochemical sensing being the most common (64% of papers) (Table 1). Shrivastava et al. (2021a) and Shrivastava et al. (2021b) described a handheld colorimetric sensor for rapid detection of lead and barium in GSR using polyvinyl alcohol capped silver nanoparticles and malonate capped gold nanoparticles respectively, ensuring rapid detection with no interference from other metal ions.
TABLE 1
| Sensing technology | Description | Research papers | Review papers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colourimetric | Shrivastava et al. detailed the use of a handheld sensor using PVA capped AgNPs for detection of lead in gunshot residue and malonate capped AuNPs for detection of barium without interference from other metal ions | Shrivastava et al. (2021a), Shrivastava et al. (2021b) | |
| Electrochemical | Key themes were the use of 3D printing, doping of electrodes and ad hoc literature reviews | Castro et al. (2020), Promsuwan et al. (2020a), Chedid et al. (2023), McKeever et al. (2022) | Harshey et al. (2021), Shrivastava et al. (2021c), Castro et al. (2022) |
| Luminescence | Papers detail the detection of novel nontoxic ammunition alongside novel techniques to detect common metal ions within gunshot residue | Chedid et al. (2023), Chaiendoo et al. (2021) | Shrivastava et al. (2021c) |
| Other | Ad hoc review of LIBS | Senesi et al. (2021) | |
| Currently used by UK police and authorities | |||
| UK police currently use colourimetric spot tests Modified Griess Test and Sodium Rhodizonate Test to detect nitrite and lead residues respectively (Krishna and Ahuja, 2023) | |||
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in gunshot analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site gunshot analysis.
Electrochemical sensing studies have common themes of 3D printing and doped electrodes (the addition of impurities to modulate properties of the electrodes (Castro et al., 2020) alongside many review articles (36% of publications). Castro et al. (2020) detail the use of 3D-printed electrodes for simultaneous and semi-quantitative detection of lead and antimony (both present in GSR) without the need for sample preparation. Simultaneous detection reduces the numbers of tests needed to ensure identification of different types of GSR, reducing costs and time. Furthermore, the augmentation of electrode response through doping is shown to enable detection at lower concentrations. Promsuwan et al. (2020a) demonstrated enhanced electrocatalytic response with palladium doped glassy carbon microspheres, while McKeever et al. (2022) used voltametric electrodes with magnetic nanoparticles for propellant stabilizer detection. Several ad hoc reviews highlighted the benefits of advanced electrochemical methods such as single strip-based techniques over current heavy instrumentation, such as mass spectrometry (Shrivastava et al., 2021c; Harshey et al., 2021) due to their user-friendliness, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness A third more general review highlighted the benefits of 3D-printing in electrochemical sensing as a powerful, affordable and accessible tool (Castro et al., 2022) emphasising the importance of these research endeavours reaching end users.
Chedid et al. (2023) discussed luminescence sensors for new nontoxic ammunition, which requires alternative detection techniques due to a lack of the conventional metals for detection of GSR. The presence of an inorganic luminescent chemical marker in GSR is shown to be effectively detected using square-wave voltammetry on a carbon paste electrode. Sensors able to detect these new residues will be essential moving forward and demonstrates the need for constant re-evaluation of the current target analytes and therefore techniques needed to detect them.
Senesi et al. (2021) provide an ad hoc review of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for gunpowder origin analysis looking at both prototype instruments and commercially available analysers. Key areas for future research focus on improving the portability and analysis speed of LIBS instruments outside the laboratory while maintaining high performance.
In the UK, police use colorimetric spot tests (Modified Griess Test and Sodium Rhodizonate Test) for on-site GSR analysis (Krishna and Ahuja, 2023), but these have low specificity and can degrade samples (Shrivastava et al., 2021c). Samples are often sent to labs for analysis using scanning electron microscopes (SEM), LIBS, and SERS (Cellmark, 2025b). A move towards field-deployable SEM can provide improvements to current investigative methods (Cellmark, 2025b).
To address these drawbacks, research detailed in the SR highlights promising advancements. Colorimetric sensors using capped nanoparticles (NPs) have been shown to reduce interference from other metal ions in samples (Shrivastava et al., 2021a; Shrivastava et al., 2021b), overcoming issues faced by current devices. Additionally, electrochemical methods under development demonstrate increased specificity compared to current spot tests, with the potential for simultaneous detection. These methods also offer benefits such as cheaper instrumentation and simpler user interfaces, thereby overcoming cost and training barriers (Castro et al., 2020; Castro et al., 2022).
3.2.3 Counterfeits/documentation
Sensors for counterfeit and documentation analysis help identify authentic and forged documents and develop anticounterfeiting labels. 23 (3%) publications were concerned with counterfeit and document analysis, with luminescence sensing technology being most commonly used (78% of papers, see Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Sensing technology | Description | Research papers | Review papers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colourimetric | Security inks using blue emitters have been demonstrated in anticounterfeiting labels | Kumar and Singh (2023) | |
| Electrochemical | An ad hoc review looking at the potential for magnetic nanoparticles to enhance electrochemical detection for forensic applications is presented | Nadar et al. (2021) | |
| Immunoassay | Two ad hoc reviews focus on the potential for aggregation-induced emission and magnetic nanoparticles to apply advances made in other sectors with this technology to forensic detection | Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021) | |
| Luminescence | Key themes were the use of doped materials and ecofriendly materials. Alongside ad hoc literature reviews | Fouad and Saif (2020), Guleria et al. (2020), Kamal and Saif (2020), Naik et al. (2020), Praveen et al. (2020), Srivastava et al. (2020), Suresh et al. (2020), Szczeszak et al. (2020), Abdollahi et al. (2022), Ansari et al. (2022), Han et al. (2022), Li et al. (2022a), Narasimhamurthy et al. (2021), Ravindra et al. (2021), Dwivedi et al. (2023) | Nadar et al. (2021), Yan et al. (2021), Tomar et al. (2023), Verhagen and Kelarakis (2020) |
| Raman | Broad overview in banknote security materials and analytical techniques that are used in detecting counterfeits | Tomar et al. (2023) | |
| Other | Ad hoc review of LIBS and two papers detailing IR using chemometrics for printer ink analysis and banknote authentication | Paxton et al. (2021), Nurfarhana et al. (2022) | Senesi et al. (2021) |
| Currently used by UK police and authorities | |||
| UK police use various light sources, including ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) light, for identifying security features (College of Policing, 2017). They also employ magnetic ink detectors and portable spectrometers for this purpose (Regula Forensics, 2025) | |||
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in counterfeits or documentation analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site counterfeit and documentation analysis.
Publications identified relating to the use of luminescence sensing have common themes of doped materials and ecofriendly materials along with ad hoc reviews of the literature. Five ad hoc reviews identified examined advances in materials and nanomaterials from other research areas being applied to counterfeit sensing technologies. For example, the use of magnetic nanoclusters with super-magnetic behaviour and smaller dimensions shows significant potential for anticounterfeiting with rapid and full reversible optical responses after magnetic field application (Nadar et al., 2021). However, the shelf-life of these nanoclusters remains uncertain, necessitating further research. Research exploring the aggregation-induced emission (AIE) phenomenon, known for its remarkable luminescence properties, has proven successful in applications such as anticounterfeiting banknotes and confidential documents (Yan et al., 2021). Tetraphenylethene derivatives, exhibiting fluorescence under ultraviolet irradiation but reverting to white colour within 1 min of excitation, demonstrate this effectiveness. Carbon dots (CDs) have also been discussed with a review highlighting their superior fluorescence, low-cost, non-toxic and colour-tuneable nature (Verhagen and Kelarakis, 2020). For example, CDs can be incorporated into inks capable of functioning as novel barcodes and nanotags for authentication and anticounterfeit applications.
The doping of materials has improved detection capabilities. Kamal and Saif (2020) detail the use of barium tungstate doped with terbium ion green nanophosphor and Naik et al. (2020) discuss the use of nitrogen-doped carbon dot threads as fluorescent ink in potential anti-counterfeiting applications.
The need for environmentally friendly and non-toxic materials were key research themes (Szczeszak et al., 2020). Lanthanide-doped SrF2 nanoparticles combined with luminescent cellulose fibres have been developed for anti-counterfeiting applications, where they are invisible under ambient light but bright green under near-infrared light (Szczeszak et al., 2020). This use of organic fibres is both beneficial to the environment and reduces associated costs with material manufacture. Abdollahi et al. (2022) detail the use of metal-free and eco-friendly photoluminescent polymer nanoparticles based on oxazolidine as a sustainable alternative for anticounterfeiting.
Tomar et al. (2023) present a broad overview of banknote security materials and analytical techniques for detecting counterfeits. They discuss new anti-counterfeiting materials and fluorescent nanoparticles that can be used as anti-counterfeiting inks with technologies such as Raman spectroscopy.
Publications not using luminescence technologies included the use colourimetric techniques to produce security ink for anticounterfeiting labels making it easier to detect fakes and trace their origin or dispersal (Kumar and Singh, 2023). 1,8-naphthalimide-based blue emitters non-covalently doped on silica have been demonstrated, with excellent results, in real-world situations. Infrared (IR) technology has also been demonstrated alongside novel chemometric methods to provide successful forensic analysis on printer inks (Paxton et al., 2021) and authentication for banknotes (Nurfarhana et al., 2022).
Counterfeit detection involves examining security features such as watermarks, holograms, and special inks. The UK police currently use various tools, including ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) light, to check for security features that are invisible under normal lighting (College of Policing, 2017). However, these methods can produce false positives or negatives due to environmental factors or wear and tear and are limited to features specifically designed to be UV or IR reactive. Magnetic ink detectors are also employed to identify the presence of magnetic inks found in genuine banknotes and important documents, which are typically absent in most counterfeits (Regula Forensics, 2025). These detectors can be affected by nearby electronic devices or metal objects, and sophisticated counterfeiters increasingly use magnetic inks that can deceive them. Portable spectrometers, such as the Regula 4,115 (Regula Forensics, 2025), are used for the express verification of banknotes, featuring a built-in camera and various light sources for a comprehensive examination of security features. However, these devices are costly and require significant training for proper use.
To address these challenges, recent research highlighted in the SR points to promising advancements in colourimetric and luminescent sensing. These advances involve techniques such as doping (Kamal and Saif, 2020; Naik et al., 2020) and the use of environmentally friendly materials (Szczeszak et al., 2020; Abdollahi et al., 2022) to enhance detection capabilities and reduce costs, respectively. Additionally, magnetic nanoclusters exhibit super-magnetic behaviour compared to conventional magnetic inks (Nadar et al., 2021). Their distinct and durable magnetic properties make them difficult to replicate. However, further research is needed to commercialize these technologies.
3.2.4 Pollutants
With increasing environmental concerns, monitoring illegal discharges and pollutants is crucial. Among the 50 (6%) publications on pollutant analysis, electrochemical and luminescence technologies dominated, accounting for 70% (Table 3). Key themes identified included eco-friendly materials, dual detection (combining two sensing technologies for enhanced detection), law-enforcement approval and portability.
TABLE 3
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in pollutant analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site pollutant analysis.
To reduce environmental and other costs, the use of eco-friendly materials is important, particularly for large-scale production. Senra and Fonseca (2021) demonstrated the potential for replacing expensive tyrosinases (type-3 copper metalloenzymes) with cost-effective freshwater ciliates, rapid-growing unicellular microeukaryotes. They employed virtual screening to compute binding energies between 3D models of these homologs, paving the way for more economical alternatives. Additionally, paper-based (Noviana et al., 2019) and cellulose-based (Kamel and Khattab, 2020) biosensors were highlighted as environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional substrates.
Dual detection sensors simultaneously measure multiple parameters or analytes by integrating different sensing technologies or methods, enhancing accuracy, sensitivity, and versatility across various applications (Lan et al., 2020). Zhang et al. (2022a)ad hoc review discussed using thin layer chromatography (TLC) coupled with SERS for on-site multi-component detection. The TLC chromatographic plate is used for high-throughput separation with SERS enabling quantitative detection of mixtures. However, further work is needed to mature the technology for on-site applications, including the use of porous materials or polymers to enhance separation efficiency and the application of machine learning to improve the accuracy of quantitative signal information. Immunochromatographic assay strip readers combining immunoassay and chromatography techniques were also noted in two papers demonstrating their ability to extend the range of detectable analytes (Wu et al., 2021a) and increase the speed of detection (Lan et al., 2020).
Pena-Pereira et al. (2021) present an extensive ad hoc review of miniaturised analytical methods for detecting emerging environmental contaminants (e.g., illicit drugs, surfactants and personal care products). They highlight opportunities for low-cost, field deployable devices with the possibility for creating big data sets at low cost, and the development of screening methods to be used before more expensive traditional sensing methods (e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) are used to validate results. However, challenges include law enforcement approval, stability of sensing elements and few commercially available set-ups. Approval from law-enforcement agencies is key in moving developed sensors from small to large-scale use.
For identifying and measuring pollutants at crime scenes, accidents, or environmental incidents UK government organisations currently use instruments like GC-MS, Raman spectrometers, photoionization detectors (PIDs) and x-ray fluorescence analysers (XRF) (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025; Guidance, 2014). Portable GCs require specialised training, regular maintenance and high initial and operational costs (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025). PIDs are effective for detection of volatile organic compounds but not other pollutants (Zimmerman et al., 2020). XRF typically analyses only the surface layer of a sample, with interference from other elements and potential radiation exposure posing additional concerns (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2025).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advances to tackle these current challenges. A crucial focus lies in addressing cost concerns by exploring more economical alternatives, both in material selection (Senra and Fonseca, 2021; Noviana et al., 2019; Kamel and Khattab, 2020) and screening methods (Pena-Pereira et al., 2021), which have shown promise. Additionally, current shortcomings in the capacity of tests to detect multiple target analytes have been emphasised. Dual detection methods have emerged as a solution, enhancing the range and speed of analyte detection, though further research is needed to mature these technologies for practical use (Zhang et al., 2022a; Wu et al., 2021a).
3.2.5 Body fluids
Body fluid analysis, encompassing a wide range of analytes from salivary amylase to DNA, is crucial for combating crime. 56 (7%) publications were concerned with body fluid analysis, with all sensing technologies being fairly evenly represented (Table 4). Key themes identified included the importance of ecofriendly materials and dual detection.
TABLE 4
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in body fluid analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site body fluid analysis.
Paper-based methods show promise for on-site analysis of mitochondrial DNA and salivary amylase (Dhar et al., 2021). One paper-based device using core-shell nanoparticles identifies saliva by showing a visible colour change when the shell is disrupted by alpha-amylase exposure (Adhikary and Banerjee, 2021). For mass on-site analysis further testing on human saliva samples is needed. Kamel and Khattab (2020) discuss recent advances in cellulose-based biosensors for medical diagnosis. The use of these alternatives present renewable, less toxic and cheaper solutions to existing sensing devices.
Another key area of research is in the coupling of sensing technologies for a dual detection sensor. One example is the development of a grating-coupler as a transducer to excite surface-plasmon combined with fluorescence to identify DNA sequences creating quick and sensitive on-site analysis potential (Kasry et al., 2021). Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) offer rapid, cost-effective on-site applications, and have become widespread in recent years (Nardo et al., 2021). In their ad hoc literature review, Nardo et al. (2021) report that LFIAs have been developed to analyse prostate specific antigens (Kishbaugh et al., 2019), salivary amylase (Kishbaugh et al., 2019) and human haemoglobin (Murahashi et al., 2020).
UK police use various sensors to detect body fluids at crime scenes. Luminol and bluestar cause a luminescent reaction upon contact with haemoglobin, making bloodstains visible even if they e been cleaned or are not visible to the naked eye (College of Policing, 2017; Forensics Library, 2024). There are issues with false positives from certain metals and cleaning agents, DNA degradation complicating subsequent analysis, and the short-lived luminescent reaction making it difficult to document complex crime scenes effectively (College of Policing, 2017; Forensics Library, 2024). Rapid Stain Identification (RSID) tests detect specific body fluids like saliva, semen, and urine using specific markers like prostate-specific antigen for semen (Forensic Body Fluid Analysis Services, 2024; Harbison and Fleming, 2016). RSID tests, while specific, can still suffer from cross-reactivity and sensitivity issues with the presence of other body fluids (Harbison and Fleming, 2016). Portable DNA analysers, such as the RapidHIT ID System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2024), can be useful in time-sensitive investigations in helping identify individuals from biological samples (Forensics Library, 2024). Issues of cost and complexity in the operation of portable DNA analysers can be a limitation for smaller police departments alongside sensitivity to environmental conditions causing a reduction in performance and accuracy (Forensics Library, 2024).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to tackle current challenges. Research into eco-friendly materials has shown promise in paper-based DNA detection methods, which can reduce costs (Dhar et al., 2021). Additionally, the use of dual detection techniques has been explored, demonstrating potential for rapid and sensitive on-site DNA analysis (Kasry et al., 2021). Improvements to RSID tests are also being investigated, with methods such as core-shell nanoparticles being researched for rapid colourimetric testing (Adhikary and Banerjee, 2021). However, these methods require further testing on human samples before they can be commercially utilised.
3.2.6 Explosives
Sensors in explosives analysis facilitate the (proactive) identification of potential explosive threats, such as during the screening of large crowds. 83 (10%) publications were concerned with explosives analysis, with luminescence sensing technology being the most commonly used (47% of papers, see Table 5). Key themes identified included dual detection, selective detection, 3D printing and portability of sensors.
TABLE 5
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in explosives analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site explosives analysis.
Dual detection enhances sensitivity and selectivity, with Cao et al. (2022) proposing the combined use of colourimetric and fluorescent sensing with a carbon dots/titanyl sulfate (CDs/TiOSO4) sensing system for peroxides. Su et al. (2022) also demonstrate colourimetric sensing alongside luminescence using a Pt (II) terpyridyl complex-based sensing platform for perchlorate detection in water, soil and air. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) offer artificial recognition sites with a fluorescent composite of carbon dots (CDs) for on-site analysis (Nadar et al., 2021). The use of these dual detection methods limits the selectivity from other strong oxidants which could otherwise generate false positives (Cao et al., 2022).
3D printing rapidly produces electrodes for electrochemical sensing. For example, Cardoso et al. (2020) compared 3D printing pens and desktop printers for TNT detection. A key advantage of 3D printed electrodes is that new electrode surfaces can be generated by polishing thereby enabling reuse of the sensor–another advantage over chemically-modified electrochemical sensors (Cardoso et al., 2020). Urbanová and Pumera (2020) looked at the use of 3D printed titanium electrodes and Castro et al. (2022) completed an ad hoc review of 3D-printed electrochemical sensors showing the great promise they have for portable, on-site analysis.
Furthermore, continuous real-time monitoring of many explosives has been explored using a free-standing thin-film sensor relying on the catalytic decomposition of the explosive and its heat effects (Ricci and Gregory, 2021). Senesi et al. (2021) reviewed laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), a chemical elemental analysis technique which is found to be a sensitive and selective sensing technology suitable for on-site measurement.
In investigating crime scenes with potential explosives, UK police currently use a variety of on-site devices. Portable explosive detectors, such as ion mobility and mass spectrometers, offer rapid detection but face issues like high-cost, false positives from molecules with similar structures, sensitivity to environmental conditions like humidity and temperature and a limited range of detectable compounds, particularly newer or less common explosives (ENFSI, 2021). Canine units can be used with their high sensitivity to detect a range of explosive materials quickly (NPSA, 2025). Issues of high training costs, fatigue and distraction and the potential for false positives or false negatives due to masking odours (NIST, 2025). Colourimetric kits provide simple and immediate results but lack specificity and their storage and shelf-life can have a large impact on their effectiveness (ENFSI, 2021). Fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy provide non-destructive analysis utilising compounds unique spectral fingerprints. These technologies face limitations due to their complexity, high costs, the need for trained personnel and potential interference from other substances (ENFSI, 2021).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Issues of high-cost, false positives and range of target analytes within current sensors are seen to be tackled by research within identified SR papers with dual detection gaining significant attention (Su et al., 2022; Nadar et al., 2021). Dual detection is also seen to provide an improvement to the lack of specificity associated with current colourimetric tests (Cao et al., 2022; Su et al., 2022). Additionally, the 3D printing of electrodes in electrochemical sensors is being explored to reduce the costs of current sensing technologies (Castro et al., 2022; Cardoso et al., 2020). Continuous real-time monitoring, as presented in the SR literature, offers a substantial improvement over current canine units by reducing costs and training time (Ricci and Gregory, 2021).
3.2.7 Poison/toxin
Sensors for poison and toxin analysis are crucial for safeguarding health, protecting the environment and responding to hazardous material emergencies. 99 (13%) publications were concerned with poison/toxin analysis, with luminescence sensing technologies being the most commonly used (41% of papers, see Table 6). Key themes of eco-friendly materials, fast response and on-site technologies have been highlighted in identified papers with development of recognition elements playing a key role in achieving these.
TABLE 6
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in poison or toxin analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site poison and toxin analysis.
The use of AIE phenomenon on filter paper strips detecting volatile poisons and pesticides has been demonstrated, though further research is needed for detecting poisons in body fluids and universal AIE probes for group recognition (Yan et al., 2021). A recognition element that detects classes of poisons would reduce sensing time and cost (Senra and Fonseca, 2021). An ad hoc review (Nardo et al., 2021) of LFIAs (also discussed above) details their use in the rapid on-site detection of viruses (Couturier et al., 2020; DeMers et al., 2020), toxins (Wu et al., 2020a; Li et al., 2020d; Bever et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2019), mycotoxins (Li et al., 2019a; Huang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2019b; Wang et al., 2021b; Wang et al., 2020b; Byzova et al., 2020), bacteria (Zhuang et al., 2020; Ilhan et al., 2021; He et al., 2019; Anfossi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019), allergens (Galan-Malo et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021b) and pesticides (Ge et al., 2020; Cevallos-Cedeño et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020a). Paper-based on-site methods for pathogen detection using isothermal nucleic acid amplification are demonstrated (Dhar et al., 2021). Fast response time has been demonstrated using two fluorescent probe molecules (4-mercaptocoumarins) in a test strip to detect mustard gas and its analogues with a 3 min response time and high sensitivity (Xue et al., 2021).
Another key theme was sensing of gaseous target analytes. Shin et al. (2020) developed a sensitive colorimetric gas sensor with a smartphone-based analysis for real-time quantitative detection of bacterial-derived ammonia gas, helping determine the postmortem interval (PMI). Such on-site sensing overcomes previous challenges of bacterial growth whilst the body is being moved which can produce false PMIs. Multiplexed gas sensing is discussed with several papers looking at the use of bifunctional fluorescent probes. These probes, equipped with two sensing sites, yield two distinct fluorescence responses upon exposure to either of the two target analytes, ranging from various nerve agent stimulants to mustard gas and phosgene (Feng et al., 2023).
The detection of poisons and toxins to combat crime presents a wide range of target analytes. UK police and other emergency responders currently employ a broad range of technologies for rapid and accurate on-site detection. Portable spectrometers such as Thermo Scientific’s TruDefender and FirstDefender use infrared spectroscopy but are costly and complex (Thermo Scientific, 2024). Biosensors based on electrochemical, optical or piezoelectric principles are common in use providing rapid results (Naresh and Lee, 2021; Justino et al., 2017). Challenges such as environmental instability (fluctuations in pH, humidity, and temperature), interference from complex sample matrices, and a limited detection range persist when attempting to simultaneously detect multiple analytes (Justino et al., 2017). Multiplex immunoassay platforms are also used allowing simultaneous detection of multiple toxins in a single sample by using antibodies to bind to specific toxins making them highly specific. However, there are issues of interference and a limited detection range with many potential unknown target analytes (Mégarbane et al., 2020; Pöhlmann and Elßner, 2020).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Current issues such as high costs and a limited range of detectable target analytes are being tackled by papers identified within the SR focussing on the use of AIE probes for group recognition (Yan et al., 2021) and cost-effective paper-based methods (Dhar et al., 2021). The development of these technologies is expected to significantly impact not only poison and toxin detection but also the detection of other target analytes.
3.2.8 Fingerprints
Fingerprint analysis is a key tool in modern law enforcement, providing reliable and efficient identification of individuals. 108 (14%) publications concerned fingerprint analysis, with luminescence sensing technologies being the most commonly used (79% of papers, see Table 7). Key themes include the development of environmentally friendly, non-toxic sensors and the use of nanomaterials for enhanced fingerprint sensing.
TABLE 7
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in fingerprint analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site fingerprint analysis.
The development of environmentally friendly, non-toxic sensors was a key issue identified for mass production. Azman et al. (2021) proposed using a lipase from Candida rugosa (CRL) as a greener option for fingerprint analysis on wet substrates. Although CRL is used in various scientific applications (Prlainović et al., 2013; Che Marzuki et al., 2015; Mohamad et al., 2015), its use in fingerprint visualisation is limited, presenting an exciting research opportunity.
Recent advances in the use of nanomaterials for sensing can be applied to fingerprint sensing for many benefits. A review of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to conjugate with quantum dots (QDs) for fluorescence properties has been presented (Nadar et al., 2021). Unlike traditional powders used, the small size of MNPs were found to be efficient in selectively binding to fingerprints and not the background. Gold nanoparticles on fibrous nano-silica enhance ridge details and sweat pores on various surfaces with properties of low-cost, easy preparation, chemical stability and great affinity to finger residues (Wei and Cui, 2021). Ansari et al. (2022) review applied nanomaterials and luminescent Ln3+ NPs/upconversion (UC) NPs which provide higher contrast, sensitivity and selectivity which is lacking in most of the traditional fluorescent nanomaterials used. However, more studies are needed to improve the efficiency, performance, surface-functionality and biocompatibility of these Ln3+ NPs/UCNPs for fingerprint recognition.
Carbon dots (CDs) present exceptional characteristics such as high fluorescence, non-toxicity, eco-friendliness, stability and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional methods. Shabashini et al. (2021) present an ad hoc review of publications relating to the application of CDs but of importance here is the enhancement of fingerprint visualisation, using magnetic composite powder CDs, due to the abundant surface hydrophilic groups (Ding et al., 2021a). Low-cost, superparamagnetic fluorescence performance and excellent safety makes these CDs suitable candidates for on-site visualisation. However, issues remain to transition from proof of concept to field application.
For on-site fingerprint detection the UK police use various mobile biometric devices to capture fingerprints and perform identity checks in real-time (Press Release, 2018). NEC MobileID (Fingerprint Identification, 2024) allows officers to capture fingerprints while Cross Match SEEK Avenger (Mobileidworld, 2013) captures fingerprints, iris scans and facial images. Both devices enable real-time identification cross-referencing with the UK’s central fingerprint databases (e.g., IDENT1 System (Press Release, 2018)). Fixed systems in police stations, like Morpho Livescan by IDEMIA (IDEMIA, 2025) and Crossmatch L SCAN (Neurotechnology, 2025), offer higher quality capturing. However, the use of on-site detection is preferable to reduce trips to and from police stations improving efficiency (Press Release, 2018). Many kits are currently used for developing latent fingerprints at crime scenes. These include powders and lifting tapes, which are then analysed further in a lab or using mobile devices with Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) access. The choice of powder depends on the surface, with common types being aluminium, magna flake, black granular, and black magnetic powders (Bandey and Gibson, 2006). Traditional powder lifting technologies face limitations, including sensitivity to environmental conditions, surface compatibility, DNA degradation due to chemicals used and the need for extensive training to ensure proper application and interpretation (NCJRS Virtual Library, 2001; Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, 2022).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Improvements to MobileID devices were not captured within this SR. A key theme in the papers identified through this SR was the use of nanomaterials instead of traditional powders for fingerprint detection. These nanomaterials offer enhanced sensitivity and selectivity, overcoming issues related to environmental conditions (Ansari et al., 2022; Nadar et al., 2021). However, further research is needed to improve surface functionality and biocompatibility to transition these innovations from proof of concept to widespread field application (Ansari et al., 2022; Shabashini et al., 2021; Ding et al., 2021a).
3.2.9 Food safety
For food safety, sensors are essential for maintaining the integrity of the supply chain, protecting public health and ensuring compliance with regulations. 168 (22%) publications concerned food safety, with immunoassay sensing technologies being the most commonly used (36% of papers). The remaining papers were represented by a fairly even spread of sensing technologies (Table 8). Key themes discussed include the use of dual detection, nanomaterials and portability.
TABLE 8
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in food safety analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site food safety analysis.
Tasangtong et al. (2023) discuss inkjet-printed paper devices for rapid, portable and eco-friendly formaldehyde analysis in foods. Similarly, 3D-printing of graphene-polylactic acid electrodes for atropine detection in beverages offers low-cost, reproducible, large-scale sensor production and shows great promise for developing other electrochemical sensors for analytes commonly found at crime scenes (Joao et al., 2021).
Development of dual detection sensors was seen as key across publications. Roushani et al. (2021) discuss a double recognition strategy using MIP and aptamer on a carbon electrode to sense ractopamine, a molecule commonly used in livestock feed, sometimes inappropriately or excessively. This strategy can be extended to other target analytes by the simple exchange of the relevant aptamer. The paper also highlights antibiotic degradation detection in milk using silver nanoparticle-decorated TiO2 for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and SERS (Jing et al., 2021). SPME is a new sample preparation technique that simplifies extraction and reduces sample loss. Silver nanoparticles have greater SERS activity than traditional silver sol. In combination, SPME-SERS provides rapid on-site detection.
Antibody-based sensing technologies are common in food safety analysis offering low-cost and rapid detection. Development of a fluorescent immunochromatographic strip assay based on a chlorpheniramine (CPM) antibody in the detection of CPM, a harmful illegal additive in teas and health foods is discussed (Zhou et al., 2021). A LFIA based on a fluorescence and gold nanoparticles labelled antibody for Tadalafil (a banned additive found in beverages) recognition is also presented (Suryoprabowo et al., 2021). The strip is observed under ultra-violet light and can be completed within 10-min making it perfect for on-site analysis.
The responsibility of food safety analysis tends to rest with local authorities such as environmental health officers (EHOs) and the Food Standards Agency (FSA). With many potential target analytes there are a vast array of technologies currently employed. These include portable spectrometers such as Raman spectrometers (TRUSCANRM, 2025) and IR spectrometers (PerkinElmer, 2025) to identify contaminants and potential adulterants in food products. These products present issues of initial high investment costs and personnel training with the need for special sample preparation for some IR readings. Rapid testing kits, like ATP (adenosine triphosphate) Testing Kits (Hygiena, 2025) that measure cleanliness and Lateral flow devices (LFDs) (Food Allergen Testing, 2025) for rapid, on-site pathogen detection, often face issues of specificity which can result in false positives or negatives. Chemical test strips detect residues such as pesticides, heavy metals, and other contaminants but often suffer from limited sensitivity, provide only semi-quantitative results and require specific storage conditions (Merck, 2025). This is due to their small surface area and reaction zone which restrict the amount of analyte that can interact with reagents, and the absence of amplification steps commonly used in lab-based methods. UV lights are used to check hygiene standards and detect contamination with biological residues but these only work on smoother non-porous surfaces and require additional safety precautions due to potential prolonged UV exposure (Coleparmer, 2025).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. Issues with the high cost and extensive training requirements for current spectrometers are being addressed by developing dual detectors (Roushani et al., 2021; Jing et al., 2021). Some identified dual detectors achieve similar levels of selectivity but require further development to match the sensitivity of current devices. Additionally, inkjet and 3D printed electrochemical devices are being researched as cost-effective, mass-producible alternatives (Tasangtong et al., 2023; Joao et al., 2021). Improvements in rapid testing kits also focus on dual detection, enhancing both specificity and sensitivity (Roushani et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021; Suryoprabowo et al., 2021).
3.2.10 Illicit drugs
Sensors play a pivotal role in illicit drug analysis for law enforcement, forensic investigations, public health and safety, enabling their identification, detection, and monitoring. 281 (36%) publications concerned illicit drug analysis, with electrochemical sensing technologies being the most popular (49% of papers). Colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and Raman sensing technologies represent an even share of the remaining publications. As shown in Table 9, the detection of some illicit drugs (e.g., stimulants) has received more attention than others (e.g., hallucinogens). The vast array of technologies explored for illicit drug analysis presents numerous opportunities for further research. Consequently, the key themes identified in the literature are summarized below.
TABLE 9
| Sensing technology | Drug category detected | Description | Research papers | Review papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colourimetric | Depressants | Papers look at eco-friendly materials, how to overcome interferants, portability and the use of nanomaterials | Hu et al. (2020b), Li (2020), Ryu and Kim (2022), Ha et al. (2022), Kaewnu et al. (2021), Mustafa et al. (2021), Son et al. (2021) | |
| Stimulants | Papers look at portability, material innovation (e.g. metal nanoparticles), targeted detection but also the manipulation of developed technologies to detect other target analytes | Silva and da Paixao (2022), Lin et al. (2023a), Cho and Kim (2022), Jang et al. (2022), Jornet-Martinez et al. (2021), Ameku et al. (2021), Adegoke et al. (2020) | Khorablou et al. (2021), Ahmed et al. (2020) | |
| Hallucinogen | — | |||
| Pharmaceuticals | Papers look at novel detection materials such as Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles and carbon quantum dots alongside smartphone-based assay detection | Shkembi et al. (2022), Madani-Nejad et al. (2023), Chu et al. (2020) | ||
| Dissociatives | — | |||
| Cannabinoids | Papers have focussed on portability of affinity assays and the use of ionogel-based materials | Puiu and Bala (2022), Catalan-Carrio et al. (2021) | ||
| Opioids | Papers look at the use of recognition elements for charge transfer colourimetric detection and two ad hoc reviews are presented on advances in nanobiosensors for opioids and biosensing for rapid illicit drug detection | Lin et al. (2021) | Razlansari et al. (2022), Ahmed et al. (2020) | |
| Other | Papers have focussed on ad hoc reviews with key themes of portability and nanomaterials (magnetic nanoparticles, nanoplates and nanocomposites) | Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Chen et al. (2020c), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022) | ||
| Electrochemical | Depressants | Key themes were the use of graphene-based materials (enhancing sensitivity and selectivity), nano- and 2D- materials, portability and dual detection | Jiang et al. (2023), Boroujerdi and Paul (2022a), de Lima and de Araujo (2022), Garima et al. (2022a), Mutz et al. (2022), Olean-Oliveira et al. (2023), Paschoarelli et al. (2023), Rocha et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2022a), Boroujerdi et al. (2020), Papadopoulos et al. (2020), Sohouli et al. (2020) | Davis-Martin et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022) |
| Stimulants | Key themes were the improvement of sensitivity and selectivity, portability, dual detection (particularly with MIPs) and nanomaterials | Silva and da Paixao (2022), Hu et al. (2022b), Jiang et al. (2023), Atik et al. (2023), El-Akaad et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022h), Sposito et al. (2022), Wu et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2022d), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Takahashi et al. (2022), Abd-Elsabour et al. (2022), Abnous et al. (2022), Anvari et al. (2023), Borgul et al. (2022a), Borgul et al. (2022b), Castro et al. (2021), de Faria et al. (2022), Ghorbanizamani et al. (2022), González-Hernández et al. (2022a), Saisahas et al. (2022b), Lee et al. (2022c), Li et al. (2021d), Novais et al. (2022), Papaioannou et al. (2022), Pospisilová et al. (2023), Schram et al. (2022), Vargas et al. (2022), Wang et al. (2021d), Xu et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022f), Zhou et al. (2022d), Borgul et al. (2021), Ameku et al. (2021), Tan et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Couto et al. (2021), Liu et al. (2020b), Ruchala et al. (2021), Rocha et al. (2021b), Akgönüllü et al. (2020), Anvari et al. (2021), Haghighi et al. (2020), Lima et al. (2020), Nayini et al. (2020), Ott et al. (2020), Shishkanova et al. (2020), Yang et al. (2021c) | Khorablou et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022), Almabadi et al. (2023), Bilge et al. (2022), Boroujerdi and Paul (2022b), Ahmed et al. (2020) | |
| Hallucinogen | Key themes were the use of dual detection (particularly MIPs) and portability | Jiang et al. (2023), Li et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Vargas et al. (2022), Silva et al. (2021), Van Echelpoel et al. (2022), Van Echelpoel et al. (2023), Ribeiro et al. (2020), Amr et al. (2021) | Brown and Dennany (2022) | |
| Pharmaceuticals | Key themes were the use of nanomaterials, eco-friendly materials, portability and improved sensitivity and selectivity | Sposito et al. (2022), Sachdeva et al. (2021), Sanguarnsak et al. (2022), Borgul et al. (2021), Boroujerdi et al. (2022a), Dias et al. (2021), Düzmen and Aslanoglu (2022), Elbalkiny and Samir (2022), Kadhim et al. (2023), Pogăcean et al. (2022), Saisahas et al. (2022a), Wahba et al. (2023), Promsuwan et al. (2020b) | Mostafa et al. (2022) | |
| Dissociatives | Papers focus on the detection of ketamine and other “date rape” drugs. Looking at MIPs, nanoparticles and the reusability and portability of devices | Soliman et al. (2023), Rocha et al. (2021a), Zou et al. (2022b) | ||
| Cannabinoids | Papers look at the problem of novel cannabinoid detection and how their constant development impacts their detection alongside the use of screen-printed electrodes with nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes | Puiu and Bala (2022), Jiang et al. (2023), Ameen et al. (2022), Brenes et al. (2022), Pholsiri et al. (2023), Ameen et al. (2020), Klimuntowski et al. (2020) | Brown and Dennany (2022), Amini et al. (2022) | |
| Opioids | Key themes were the use of multiplexing (simultaneous detection of multiple drugs), issues of interferents within samples, disposable sensors and an ad hoc review on current and future perspectives on opioid sensors | Borgul et al. (2022c), González-Hernández et al. (2022b), Khorablou et al. (2022), Mousaabadi et al. (2022), Ortiz-Aguayo et al. (2022), Singh et al. (2022b), Wang et al. (2023b), Yang et al. (2022d) | Glasscott et al. (2020), Choinska et al. (2022), Ahmed et al. (2020) | |
| Other | Key themes were the use of dual detection, printing of cells (paper and 3D printing), portability, nanomaterials and multiplexing | Yu et al. (2023b), Ferreira et al. (2021b), Joosten et al. (2022), Parrilla et al. (2021), Parrilla et al. (2022), Poulladofonou et al. (2022), Zamani and Yamini (2023), Ceto et al. (2022), Sanli et al. (2020), Brown et al. (2020), Ataide et al. (2020), Noviana et al. (2019), Rocha et al. (2020), Shishkanova et al. (2021), Amr et al. (2021), De Rycke et al. (2020), Dragan et al. (2021), Ferrari et al. (2020), Li et al. (2021e), Masemola et al. (2020), Zanfrognini et al. (2020), Montali et al. (2020) | Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Mani et al. (2021), Amiri et al. (2021), Teymourian et al. (2020), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022), Castro et al. (2022), Dai (2023), Ren et al. (2021), Su (2022)2 | |
| Immunoassay | Depressants | Papers look at the use of MIPs and carbon-dot technologies alongside the development of wearable sensors for continuous monitoring | Hu et al. (2020b), Yen et al. (2020), Jiang et al. (2023) | |
| Stimulants | Key themes were the use of dual detection (with electrochemical and fluorescent/ optical technologies), multiplexing (derivatisation-assisted immunoassay for group-specific detection) and portability | Lin et al. (2023a), Hu et al. (2022b), Jiang et al. (2023), Atik et al. (2023), El-Akaad et al. (2021), Li et al. (2022h), Sposito et al. (2022), Wu et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2022d), Esmaelpourfarkhani et al. (2023), Paul et al. (2021), Zamanian et al. (2022), Geng et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2021a), Morita et al. (2022), Zhao et al. (2022c), Tan et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a), Couto et al. (2021), Liu et al. (2020b), Grothe et al. (2021) | Lal et al. (2022) | |
| Hallucinogen | Papers look at nanomaterial modification such as incorporation of graphene oxide for enhanced sensor performance, conductivity and stability. Selective detection of the target analyte was also covered for accurate and reliable detection in complex samples | Jiang et al. (2023), Li et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2022a) | ||
| Pharmaceuticals | Papers focus on dual detection with nandrolone aptamers for colourimetric detection (steroids), MIPs for electrochemical sensing of diltiazem (high blood pressure treatment) and fluorescence polarisation immunoassay for amitriptyline (antidepressant) | Shkembi et al. (2022), Sposito et al. (2022), Medyantseva et al. (2022) | ||
| Dissociatives | Looks at the use of core-shell MIPs for on-site selective determination of ketamine | Soliman et al. (2023) | ||
| Cannabinoids | Papers look at the use of nanomaterials such as nanocellulose and graphene oxide | Jiang et al. (2023), Solin et al. (2023), Balaban et al. (2020) | ||
| Opioids | Papers look at multiplexed detection for fentanyl and its analogues and for multiple narcotics or explosives at once using a biosensor array. Papers also examine dual detection and detection in human matrices, specifically highlighting the utilization of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) in conjunction with an immunochromatographic assays for morphine detection in saliva | Canoura et al. (2023), Scorsone et al. (2021), Li et al. (2020) | ||
| Other | Key themes were dual detection, eco-friendly materials (enzyme-based paper tests), drug monitoring in waste-water and interferents | Yan et al. (2022), Gozdzialski et al. (2023), Sanli et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2020d), Wille and Elliott (2021), Zinna et al. (2020), Senra and Fonseca (2021), Garcia-Cruz et al. (2020), Badawy (2020), Suherman et al. (2020), Truta et al. (2020) | Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Karimi-Maleh et al. (2020), Nardo et al. (2021), Mao et al. (2021a), Rary et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2020), Santillo (2020), Bräuer et al. (2021), Soni et al. (2022b) | |
| Luminescence | Depressants | Papers look at advanced materials (nanostructured photonic hydrogels, AIE active fluorene-containing compounds, and graphene materials), on-site monitoring and specificity towards intended target analytes | Ryu and Kim (2022), Ahmed et al. (2022), Dahiwadkar et al. (2022), Garima et al. (2022b), Garrido et al. (2023) | Brown and Dennany (2022) |
| Stimulants | Key themes were dual detection (quantum dots, aptamers, metal-organic frameworks), ultrasensitive detection and novel materials | Hu et al. (2022b), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Takahashi et al. (2022), Esmaelpourfarkhani et al. (2023), Paul et al. (2021), Zamanian et al. (2022), Adegoke et al. (2023), Ding et al. (2021b), Elmizadeh et al. (2023), Guo et al. (2022a), Tan et al. (2022), Ruchala et al. (2021), Dokuzparmak et al. (2021), Jeong et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020e), Zhang and Yan (2020), Zhao et al. (2020b), Mittal et al. (2020) | Khorablou et al. (2021), Brown and Dennany (2022) | |
| Hallucinogen | Papers look at the use of silica nanoparticles loaded with fluorescent dye for detection of novel psychedelic drug and an ad hoc review is presented on the use of electrochemiluminescence sensors for drug detection | Garrido et al. (2020) | Brown and Dennany (2022) | |
| Pharmaceuticals | Key themes were dual detection, nanomaterials, specificity, portability (through miniaturisation) and functionalised surfaces | Sachdeva et al. (2021), Sanguarnsak et al. (2022), Medyantseva et al. (2022), Adegoke et al. (2022), Al-Hetlani et al. (2020) | ||
| Dissociatives | — | |||
| Cannabinoids | Papers look at the portability of affinity assays and the screening of samples in herbal mixtures (interferents present) with gold nanoclusters | Puiu and Bala (2022), Yen et al. (2022a) | Brown and Dennany (2022) | |
| Opioids | Papers look at the use of nanobiosensors with nanomaterials and bio-recognition elements for high sensitivity and selectivity alongside considering interferents that will be found in real samples and the potential for multiplexing | Yan et al. (2023), Scorsone et al. (2021), Alhaddad and Sheta (2020) | Razlansari et al. (2022) | |
| Other | Key themes were portability and nanomaterials | Yu et al. (2023b), Yan et al. (2022), Warning et al. (2021), Chen et al. (2023d), Pal et al. (2023), Wei et al. (2022), Yen et al. (2022b), Brown et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2021a), Zhang et al. (2020d), Montali et al. (2020) | Kamel and Khattab (2020), Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Nadar et al. (2021), Neal et al. (2021), Anzar et al. (2022), Dagar et al. (2022), Hang et al. (2022), Loch et al. (2023) | |
| Raman | Depressants | Papers look at nanomaterials, discussing nanosheets and nanocluster formation, alongside the need for rapid and sensitive detection | Chen et al. (2021b), Sha et al. (2020), Açikgöz and Hamamci (2020), Wang et al. (2021e) | |
| Stimulants | Key themes were nanomaterials, multiplexing and machine learning (for complex detection scenarios), portability and removal of the need for pre-treatment | González-Hernández et al. (2022a), Geng et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2021b), Atta and Tuan (2023), Chio et al. (2021), Hong et al. (2022), Mao et al. (2021d), Wang et al. (2022f), Ye et al. (2023), Alder et al. (2021), Fang et al. (2020), Liyanage et al. (2020), Mao et al. (2021d), Picone et al. (2020), Smith et al. (2021) | Mao et al. (2021c) | |
| Hallucinogen | Looks at the detection of drugs in urine through the rapid formation of Ag nanoclusters | Chen et al. (2021b) | ||
| Pharmaceuticals | Papers look at the need for SERS techniques capable of handling real-world samples and the use of nanomaterials (MOF-gold core-satellite nanostructure and Au-coated Si nano-cone) for label-free, portable SERS | Boroujerdi et al. (2022b), Fan et al. (2022), Ren et al. (2022) | ||
| Dissociatives | Papers look at π-metal interaction for co-assembly enabling ultratrace detection and identification of a novel norketamine precursor | Ding et al. (2023), Yen et al. (2022c) | ||
| Cannabinoids | Looks at the detection of drugs in urine through the rapid formation of Ag nanoclusters | Chen et al. (2021b) | ||
| Opioids | Key themes were nanomaterials, interferents (complex samples), quantitative detection and portability | Ding et al. (2023), Li et al. (2023c), Su et al. (2023), Zhang et al. (2021d), Zhao et al. (2022d), Li et al. (2020), Liyanage et al. (2020), Akçan et al. (2020), Fedick et al. (2020), Han et al. (2021), Ye et al. (2021) | ||
| Other | Key themes were nanomaterials, portability, dual detection and eco-friendly materials | Gozdzialski et al. (2023), Cai et al. (2022a), Atta and Vo-Dinh (2023), Azimi and Docoslis (2022), Zhang et al. (2022g), Goel et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2021e), Wille and Elliott (2021), Vunckx et al. (2020), Wu et al. (2020d), Burr et al. (2020), Han et al. (2020), Zhang et al. (2020g), Zhu et al. (2020) | Hang et al. (2022) | |
| Other | Depressants | Papers look at near IR for differentiation of new psychoactive substances and a review of ethanol intoxication sensing technologies is presented. A systematic review for drug-facilitated sexual assault monitoring is also presented | Kranenburg et al. (2022a) | Paprocki et al. (2022), Soni et al. (2021) |
| Stimulants | Papers look at a variety of detection technologies including surface plasmon resonance and focus on extraction in complex media | Kranenburg et al. (2022a), Far et al. (2022), Qiu et al. (2023), Yao et al. (2022b), Özgür et al. (2020) | ||
| Hallucinogen | Papers look at near IR and the influence of water of crystallisation | Kranenburg et al. (2022a), Kranenburg et al. (2023) | ||
| Pharmaceuticals | Papers look at asthma inhaler use via terahertz spectroscopy and a β-cyclodextrin holographic sensor for ibuprofen detection | Tyree et al. (2023), Yu et al. (2023c) | ||
| Dissociatives | A systematic review for drug-facilitated sexual assault monitoring is presented | Soni et al. (2021) | ||
| Cannabinoids | Paper looks at near IR for differentiation of new psychoactive substances | Kranenburg et al. (2022a) | ||
| Opioids | Paper looks at polyanionoic cylcodextrins in the detection of fentanyl | Mayer et al. (2023) | ||
| Other | Key themes were nanomaterials, portability and interferents | Dahiya et al. (2022), Díez-Pascual et al. (2022), Alonzo et al. (2022), Kranenburg et al. (2022b), Kranenburg et al. (2022c), Rui et al. (2023), Hung et al. (2022), Rahman et al. (2020) | Pena-Pereira et al. (2021), Senesi et al. (2021), Moradi et al. (2022), Yeasmin et al. (2022), Zubrycka et al. (2022) | |
| Currently used by UK police and authorities | ||||
| Current on-site testing for powdered, liquid or pill samples use NIK tests (ProPublica, 2025; Symonsbergen et al., 2018). For analysis in saliva and sweat the UK police use DrugWipe (lateral flow immunoassay detection) (DrugWipe, 2025) | ||||
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in illicit drug analysis, alongside details of technologies currently used by UK police and authorities for on-site illicit drug analysis.
3.2.10.1 Portability, Affordability and ease of use
Key to successful implementation of roadside drug testing is portability, with many review papers (Teymourian et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2021; Moradi et al., 2022) suggesting further work that needs to be done to achieve this.
SERS technology on a paper-based substrate enables on-site detection, such as for fentanyl citrate in serum and urine. This method utilises a paper-based SERS substrate embedded with chloride ion treated gold nanospheres, with SERS spectra collected using a portable Raman spectrometer (Han et al., 2021).
The development of a fluorescence immunochromatographic assay (FICA) strip reader provides low cost, user-friendly, highly sensitive and rapid detection capabilities, enabling convenient on-site testing (Wu et al., 2021a). This sensor incorporates a photoelectric adjustment system, leveraging the linear correlation between fluorescence and excitation light intensity, enabling precise tuning of the excitation light intensity. Such adjustment broadens the potential detection range for target analytes. This technology will have implications in many sensing devices for various target analytes on-site.
Truta et al. (2020) show that electrochemical methods can rapidly determine drugs with rapid, sensitive, selective detection in complex human matrices (e.g., blood, urine or saliva) and are easily miniaturised for on-site use. However, the electrochemical sensing of illicit drugs so far has been limited to academic research–no commercial market appears to have been conquered yet. Square-wave voltammetry (SWV) is the most widely used voltammetry technology for facile and rapid quantitative sensing of illicit drugs (De Rycke et al., 2020). The choice of electrode, especially the working electrode, can have a large impact on a sensor’s sensitivity. De Rycke et al. (2020) predict that carbon paste electrodes will further gain popularity and be used in most electrochemical sensors for the detection of illicit drugs as they are flexible in design with the possibility for miniaturisation. The presence on the market of cheap and disposable electrochemical cells, namely, screen-printed electrodes, has made feasible the creation of effective devices for the quantification of illicit drugs in an on-site screening test (Zanfrognini et al., 2020).
Nanomaterials, with their unique properties and low cost, enhance electrochemical sensor sensitivity for detecting drugs in low concentrations (Truta et al., 2020). However, future electrochemical sensor development needs to consider the implementation of biocompatible and environmentally friendly materials (Klimuntowski et al., 2020). Many articles discuss the potential of paper-based portable sensors to aid police enforcement (Noviana et al., 2019; Sha et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021; Ameku et al., 2021; Rocha et al., 2021a; Ribeiro et al., 2020; Dias et al., 2021; Saisahas et al., 2022a; Pholsiri et al., 2023; Ataide et al., 2020; Solin et al., 2023; Alder et al., 2021; Mao et al., 2021c). Cellulose is also discussed as a potential low-cost, environmentally friendly supporting material for biosensors, whose high number of hydroxyl functional groups provide the ability for the construction of novel materials for new advanced biosensor-based applications (Kamel and Khattab, 2020).
A pivotal review article surveys literature spanning the last 2 decades, focusing on optical and electrochemical sensing technologies for analysing methamphetamine (Khorablou et al., 2021). Many low-cost sensing technologies have been outlined from fluorescence to electro-chemiluminescence highlighting the range of existing and potential low-cost sensing platforms for methamphetamine. Application of these developed sensing technologies to other drug sensing provides a low-cost, high-yield route for further sensing development.
To reduce errors of inference by non-experts (i.e., most police officers do not have chemistry degrees), on-site drug tests would need to be simple to operate and interpret. Therefore, recent publications for on-site testing have focused on the simplification of current systems. Research includes the design of data processing software to simplify measurements (Noviana et al., 2019), potential for smartphone control of sensors (Madani-Nejad et al., 2023), and the development of smartphone apps for interpreting data (Garcia-Cruz et al., 2020).
3.2.10.2 Matrix tolerance and interferents
Roadside drug sensors will require detection in a human matrix which introduces issues of interference and may require sample pre-treatment (Zanfrognini et al., 2020). Therefore, testing in a greater range of potential matrices to make technologies field ready is attractive (Papadopoulos et al., 2020). Electro-chemiluminescent screening using a Nafion film on a glassy carbon electrode is a sensing technique that requires little to no extraction or sample preparation. This provides ideal implementation for on-site screening in serum, urine and saliva (Dokuzparmak et al., 2021). Saliva-based drug detection is of particular interest for on-site screening, as unlike blood assays, it does not require invasive sample collection (Truta et al., 2020). Selective discrimination of illicit drugs and their metabolites is a key theme to be explored for many sensing devices (Gill et al., 2020).
3.2.10.3 Specificity
For roadside drug testing, high specificity is needed to ensure the fair apprehension of suspects. Many drugs, due to degradation (Truta et al., 2020), are identified through their metabolites in body fluids (Wille and Elliott, 2021). Technologies outlined to improve specificity include the use of novel recognition elements such as aptamers (Ahmed et al., 2020) – which provide a cheap method to bind to target groups enabling sensing–and the combination of two sensor elements. For example, molecularly imprinted polymers and graphene quantum dots as a signal amplifier offer a revolution in sensor design by increasing surface area and conductivity (Khorablou et al., 2021).
3.2.10.4 Multiplexing
Multiplex detection is increasingly important, allowing simultaneous analysis of multiple analytes (Mani et al., 2021; De Rycke et al., 2020; Klimuntowski et al., 2020). This will be vital for on-site drug tests as there are many potential target drugs that need to be identified. Paper-based sensors have the potential for multiplexed detection and will be important for on-site application (Noviana et al., 2019). Lateral flow tests provide rapidity, simplicity, relative cost-effectiveness, and the possibility to be used by non-skilled personnel. However, drawbacks include possible cross-reactivity, matrix interference and (easy) manipulation by users (e.g., the use of soda to cause a false positive). A lateral flow immunoassay combines multiple lines to increase detection capability, where each line contains a specific recognition element for different target analytes. However, the addition of multiple recognition sites and therefore lateral flow lines requires an increased sample volume, higher fabrication costs and increased reagent use (Nardo et al., 2021).
The importance of illicit drug analysis in combating crime is evidenced by the volume of publications identified and the variety of sensing technologies used. From the above analysis it is evident that portability, specificity, matrix tolerance and multiplexing are key components that require further research for a commercial on-site drug test. It is observed that low-cost, simply operated, portable devices are being developed, including paper-based devices requiring little to no extraction and sample preparation. Advances are also being made to increase detection limits and reduce costs, with a focus on saliva-based detection. However, more research is needed particularly in the discrimination between certain target analytes including amphetamine type stimulants. This is particularly critical as often in illicit drug analysis the target is unknown and therefore determination of its exact identity is important. Portable sensor development should involve environmentally friendly materials and the use of nanomaterials alongside the development of software for the extraction of data. The specificity of the sensor will be vital and an understanding of drug concentrations, half-life and metabolites in the matrix will also be key. Electrochemical sensing, particularly SWV, has yet to impact the commercial market for mass on-site detection but its relative cheapness, ease of use and sensitivity make it ideal.
With the focus on low cost testing we are looking at detecting drug offenses on-site. For example, identifying those under the influence with drug driving, drink spiking and identifying samples rapidly. Specific drug detection kits used by the UK police for on-site analysis vary depending on factors such as region, budget of the police force and advancements of technology (Evidential Drug Identification Testing, 2023).
UK police use various kits for on-site drug analysis, such as NIK tests for powders, pills, or liquids (Symonsbergen et al., 2018). These reagent tests including Marquis (MDMA), Mandelin (MDMA, opiates), Scott (cocaine), and Simons (MDMA, methamphetamine) utilize colorimetric methods and are popular for their ease of use and quick results. However, they have limitations. Their sensitivity and specificity are restricted, leading to potential false positives or negatives due to interference from other substances. This means they may miss low concentrations of drugs or misidentify substances, necessitating confirmatory testing for accurate results (ProPublica, 2025). Additionally, these tests typically only cover a limited range of drugs, potentially missing emerging substances. This necessitates the use of multiple tests or techniques to accurately identify the presence and type of drugs in a sample, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive for law enforcement agencies.
For drug driving analysis in saliva and sweat, the UK police currently use the Securetech & Dreiger (DrugWipe (DrugWipe, 2025)) sensor to detect cannabis and cocaine. DrugWipe employs a lateral flow immunoassay detection system based on the principle of competitive binding. An anti-drug antibody binds either to a protein conjugate line, forming a visible test line, or to the target drug, if present, reducing the appearance of the test line (DrugWipe, 2025). This technology has type approval (Testler, 2025), indicating it meets the specifications required by the Home Office. However, having roadside evidential screening that allows the analysis to be used as court evidence would be beneficial for the police.
Therefore, current on-site drug detection kits provide only preliminary results, requiring confirmatory testing by certified laboratories - often using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) - for legal purposes, leading to additional costs and delays in proceedings (ProPublica, 2025).
Recent research highlighted in the SR indicates promising advancements to address current challenges. The need to detect a broader range of drugs is addressed with research into dual detection methods, such as FICA strip readers, enabling the detection of multiple drugs simultaneously (Wu et al., 2021a). Lateral flow immunoassays are being investigated for multiplexing capabilities, although further research is required to reduce matrix interference (Nardo et al., 2021). Enhancements in specificity are being explored through the use of aptamers, MIPs and quantum dots (Khorablou et al., 2021; Ahmed et al., 2020). To overcome current issues related to matrix tolerance, technologies such as electro-chemiluminescent screening are also being researched (Dokuzparmak et al., 2021).
3.2.11 Other
Only 35 (5%) publications meeting the inclusion criteria did not focus on specific target analytes, affirming the appropriateness of chosen key analyte categories. These publications included a fairly even split of the sensing technology categories (Tables 9, 10).
TABLE 10
| Sensing technology | Description | Research papers | Review papers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colourimetric | Papers look at eco-friendly materials with paper-based microfluidic devices and a focus on nanomaterials | Musile et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Dang et al. (2022) | Costanzo et al. (2023) |
| Electrochemical | Key themes were nanomaterials monolayer-protected gold nanoparticles, 2D materials, graphite electrodes, 3D electrodes, and wireless wearable electrochemical sensors and eco-friendly materials low-cost stencil printing of graphite electrodes | Kajale et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Dang et al. (2022), Kongkaew et al. (2022) | Abdelkader et al. (2022), Abdulhussein et al. (2022), Alves et al. (2021) |
| Immunoassay | Papers look at pH-switchable nanozymes and paper-based devices | Musile et al. (2021), Liang et al. (2023) | Alberti et al. (2023) |
| Luminescence | Key themes were multiplexing, portability and ad hoc reviews looking at fluorescent chemical sensors, sulfonamides and nanomaterials | Shah et al. (2023), Musile et al. (2021), Upadhyay et al. (2022), Zhang et al. (2022h), Calabretta et al. (2021), Zhao et al. (2021), Gasser et al. (2022) | Costanzo et al. (2023), Fakayode et al. (2023), Batool et al. (2022b) |
| Raman | Key themes were portability, novel substrates and ad hoc reviews saliva studies and progress in SERS scattering molecular sensing | Guo et al. (2022b), Pliatsikas et al. (2021), Parungao et al. (2022), Aleknavicene et al. (2022), Fularz et al. (2021), Khinevich et al. (2021), Lin et al. (2023b), Zhang et al. (2022b), Zhao et al. (2021) | Hardy et al. (2022), Mandal and Tewari (2022) |
| Other | Papers look at smartphone-based sensors, carbon dots and microfluidic designs | Kim et al. (2022), Ross et al. (2023), Khayal et al. (2021), Liu and Niu (2022), Marques et al. (2023) | Kulkarni et al. (2022), Geballa-Koukoula et al. (2023) |
Summary of included publications relating to the use of sensors in target analytes not covered by the outlined categories.
Many publications focussed on the detection of radioactive materials (Marques et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2022). Studies highlighted the advantages of silicon photomultipliers in beta and gamma detectors over current radiation monitors used at seaports, citing their lightweight, compact design, and lower power consumption (Marques et al., 2023). Emphasis was placed on developing environmentally friendly alternatives to current sensing technologies, including sustainable printed electrochemical platforms (Kongkaew et al., 2022) and paper-based microfluidic devices (Musile et al., 2021). Portability emerged as a key theme, with innovations such as a mobile fibre-optics Raman spectrometer addressing challenges of dispersive Raman spectroscopy and potentially enabling mobile spectroscopy applications, such as for elephant ivory (Parungao et al., 2022). Additionally, several ad hoc reviews were identified (Costanzo et al., 2023; Abdelkader et al., 2022; Abdulhussein et al., 2022; Alves et al., 2021; Alberti et al., 2023; Fakayode et al., 2023; Batool et al., 2022b; Hardy et al., 2022; Mandal and Tewari, 2022; Kulkarni et al., 2022; Geballa-Koukoula et al., 2023), covering diverse topics such as 3D electrodes in electrochemical sensing (Abdelkader et al., 2022), SERS studies on saliva (Hardy et al., 2022) and advances in SERS for molecular sensing (Mandal and Tewari, 2022).
3.2.12 UK crime statistics (2022)
Combining our systematic review findings with knowledge of current sensing devices and their limitations, along with an understanding of the volume and economic impact of various crime types, enables the identification of critical gaps where further research could significantly enhance crime prevention and response efforts.
In the UK during 2022, there were 498,381 reports of criminal damage and arson, with arson estimated at 10%–15% of cases, translating to 53,000 to 79,500 arson incidents (Criminal Damage and Arson Crime and Safety Statistics, 2025; Official Statistics, 2025). Firearms offenses totalled 5,850 (CENSUS, 2023), while counterfeit currency offenses totalled 5,600 (Ministry of Justice, 2023). Waste crime, prosecuted by the Environment Agency, costs the economy approximately £1 billion annually, leading to nearly 100 prosecutions (Environmentagency, 2023). DNA profiling aided in solving 22,477 cases, including 550 rapes and 644 homicides (Corporate Report, 2023). Explosives-related offenses totalled 348 (Corporate Report, 2023), and poisonings with intent to harm numbered 105 (Office for National Statistics, 2022). Fingerprint evidence led to 22,000 matches, solving 8,472 burglaries, 3,409 vehicle crimes, and 1,529 instances of criminal damage (Corporate Report, 2022). 610 reported food safety cases were potentially up to 3,050 due to underreporting, with a financial impact of up to £1.96 billion (Food Standards Agency, 2025b; Food Standards Agency, 2025c; Food Safety News, 2025; Food Standards Agency, 2025a). Drug-related offenses reached 200,000, with a 21% increase in drug seizures compared to 2021 (Official Statistics, 2022). In 2022, UK roadside drug wipes increased to 6,273 from 4,668 in 2021, with 53.6% testing positive (NPCC, 2025), while drink/drug driving convictions rose 40% from 2014, making drug driving a growing concern (Drug Testing Clinics, 2025).
These statistics underscore the varied impacts of different crimes, guiding the focus of future research efforts. In the UK, gunshot and counterfeit crimes had minimal impact, consistent with the low number of related SR publications. Conversely, explosives cases were fewer than expected from the SR, but their economic and social impact can be severe, justifying further research. Poisoning cases were also surprisingly low, possibly due to the narrow focus of available crime statistics indicating a need for more comprehensive data on poisons and toxins.
Pollutant and food safety crimes, though reported less frequently, have a substantial economic impact, advocating for increased research attention. Comprehensive crime statistics on body fluids remain elusive, but DNA profiling highlights numerous severe cases such as homicides and rapes, showing significant potential for combating crime. Despite this, the low number of included publications in the SR suggests insufficient research in this area. It is unclear if this is due to sufficient existing sensing devices or a research gap needing exploration, warranting further investigation.
Fire-related crimes are numerous but underrepresented in included SR publications, suggesting current technologies may suffice. Fingerprint analysis accounts for a significant number of crimes and 14% of SR publications, justifying continued research efforts.
Drug-related crimes, comprising 36% of included SR publications, have seen a dramatic increase, particularly in drug driving offenses. The substantial volume of research and crime statistics in this area indicates a significant impact and underscores the need for continued and enhanced research efforts to address drug-related crime effectively.
4 Conclusion
This report offers a concise analysis of recent advancements in low-cost sensing technologies for crime reduction, based on a systematic review. Analysis of publication trends indicates substantial growth in research focused on sensors for combating crime (125% increase in included publication numbers from 2017 to 2022). Taking stock of the literature, as was done here using a systematic approach, is thus important to identify trends and research gaps that should be pursued.
Included publications were categorised into the analytes that they targeted (illicit drugs, fingerprints, explosives, body fluids, food safety, poisons and toxins, pollutants, counterfeits and documentation, fire, gunshot and other) and the types of sensing technology used (high cost: mass spectrometry, PCR, HPLC and low cost: electrochemical, colourimetric, immunoassay, luminescence and SERS). The proportion of publications from each target analyte category remained fairly constant over the period reviewed. However, an increase was seen in the dominance of the field by the four main categories (illicit drugs, food safety, fingerprints and poisons and toxins) and an increase in particular in the dominance of illicit drug publications. In fact, more than one-third (36%) of all publications related to the analysis of illicit drugs, of which 30% focussed on stimulant abuse.
Particular attention was given to articles published from 2020 onwards, reflecting the rapid technological advancements in this area, and to articles focussing on low-cost technologies, which are argued to be most impactful in crime reduction efforts. This further detailed analysis (782 documents) revealed trends in specific areas such as illicit drug detection, where stimulants and opioids were prominent subjects. Technologies like electrochemical and luminescence sensors showed promise for creating accessible, user-friendly testing devices.
The current challenges associated with the sensing devices used by UK police and authorities were reviewed, offering insights into how ongoing research identified through the SR may address these issues. A summary of key findings follows.
Fire Analysis: UK police and fire services collaborate using tools such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), fire investigation dogs, and thermal imaging cameras. Issues include the need for portable GC-MS and the limitations of canine detection. Research into portable MOx sensors shows promise for rapid on-site analysis.
Gunshot Residue (GSR) Detection: Current methods, like colourimetric spot tests, face issues of low specificity and sample degradation. Field-deployable scanning electron microscopes (SEM) and electrochemical methods under development show potential for improved specificity and cost-effectiveness.
Counterfeit Detection: Techniques like UV and infrared light, magnetic ink detectors, and portable spectrometers are used to identify counterfeit items. However, false positives and sophisticated counterfeiting techniques pose challenges. Advances in colourimetric and luminescent sensing and magnetic nanoclusters offer improved detection capabilities.
Pollutant Measurement: Instruments like GC-MS, Raman spectrometers, photoionization detectors (PIDs), and x-ray fluorescence analysers (XRF) are used to detect pollutants. Issues include high costs, maintenance, and limited detection capabilities. Research into economical materials and dual detection methods shows promise for enhanced analyte detection.
Body Fluid Identification: Sensors such as luminol, Rapid Stain Identification (RSID) tests, and portable DNA analysers are used to detect body fluids at crime scenes. Challenges include false positives, DNA degradation, and high costs. Research into eco-friendly materials and dual detection techniques offers potential solutions.
Explosive Detection: Portable detectors, canine units, and colourimetric kits are used for on-site explosive detection. Current challenges include high costs, false positives, and limited detectable compounds. Research into dual detection methods and 3D printed electrodes for electrochemical sensors aims to address these issues.
Poison and Toxin Identification: Technologies such as portable spectrometers and biosensors are used for on-site detection. Issues include high costs, environmental stability, and limited detection range. Advances in AIE probes and paper-based methods show potential for cost-effective and comprehensive detection.
Fingerprint Detection: MobileID devices and various powders are used for on-site fingerprint detection. Current limitations include sensitivity to environmental conditions and the need for extensive training. Research into nanomaterials offers enhanced sensitivity and selectivity for fingerprint detection.
Food Safety Analysis: Local authorities use portable spectrometers, rapid testing kits, chemical test strips, and UV lights for food safety. Challenges include high costs, specificity issues, and the need for special sample preparation. Research into dual detectors and printed electrochemical devices aims to improve cost-effectiveness and sensitivity.
Illicit Drug Detection: UK police use NIK tests and DrugWipe sensors for on-site drug detection. Current limitations include sensitivity, specificity, and the need for confirmatory testing. Advances in dual detection methods, lateral flow immunoassays, and electro-chemiluminescent screening are being explored to enhance specificity and matrix tolerance.
An analysis of the prevalence of different crime types and their social and economic impacts identified research gaps that could significantly enhance crime prevention. Gunshot, counterfeit, explosives and poisoning analyses were found to have a minimal impact on UK crime compared to other analytes. While improvements in sensing for these areas would be beneficial, they should not be the primary focus in the UK at present. Pollutant and food safety analytes, though less frequently reported in crime statistics, have a substantial economic impact, indicating significant benefits from further research. The number of crimes involving body fluid analysis, particularly DNA profiling, is substantial. However, the relatively low number of related SR publications included indicates either a research gap or the adequacy of existing sensing devices. The review of SR publications relating to body fluids reveals many areas where further research is and would be beneficial, underscoring that there are significant research gaps that need to be addressed. Illicit drug-related crimes, especially drug driving, have significantly increased in recent years, comprising 36% of included SR publications. This highlights the urgent need for continued and enhanced research efforts to address these issues effectively.
Overall, the review highlights significant progress in low-cost sensing technologies for crime reduction, addressing key challenges and proposing innovative solutions for more efficient and effective crime detection and analysis. These advancements indicate promising pathways for enhancing crime detection and public safety through accessible, reliable sensing technologies. Future efforts should focus on refining dual detection methods, reducing matrix interference, and fostering collaboration between academia and law enforcement for effective implementation.
This systematic review of sensing technologies to combat crime is intended to provide policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and researchers with a comprehensive and timely evaluation of existing research, guiding strategic decisions on technology adoption and resource allocation. By identifying gaps and future research directions, the review is also intended to stimulate innovation and development of advanced sensing tools, crucial for combating sophisticated criminal activities.
5 Future outlooks
5.1 Study limitations
This work has provided a systematic review and detailed understanding of the existing sensing technologies for combating crime and key gaps in the literature where further work would be beneficial.
5.1.1 Systematic review
Although a systematic approach was taken here to ensure repeatability and extensive coverage, there is a possibility that the search terms used, or the application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria may have resulted in relevant studies being missed or excluded. Moreover, journal space limitations preclude the discussion of all insights extracted from the included studies. For example, a summary of the methods used in every publication for each analyte category would provide more understanding of the existing literature but would increase the length of the review significantly.
5.1.2 Other languages and countries
This review only included publications written in English, which means studies from non-English-speaking countries may have been excluded. This limitation highlights the potential loss of key publications and suggests that the findings of this systematic review might not be universally applicable. Engaging with international stakeholders and experts could help address this limitation and ensure a more comprehensive understanding.
5.2 Future directions
5.2.1 Patent search
Alongside a search of academic databases, it would be beneficial to search recent patent applications and grants relating to sensors utilised for combating crime. The same key search queries can be used to search databases such as Google Patents and Derwent Innovations. This will outline the most recent sensing technologies that are currently being developed and may indicate further key gaps and avenues for future beneficial research.
5.2.2 Low hanging fruit
Low hanging fruit arguably represent the best directions for further research that will allow the rapid and easy development of mass producible sensors to combat crime. To expedite advancements in sensing technologies for crime detection, focusing on integrating AI and IoT for enhanced data analysis and connectivity is paramount. Concurrently, investing in advanced materials like nanomaterials and conductive polymers can significantly improve sensor performance while reducing production costs and environmental impact. Standardising portable designs and enabling multiplexed detection capabilities are also crucial for practical deployment. Lastly, fostering collaborations between stakeholders, law enforcement officials, and government science technology agencies will accelerate the translation of research innovations into commercial products, ensuring robustness, scalability, and regulatory compliance of next-generation sensing devices.
5.2.3 Manufacture of a sensor
The overarching aim in creating this SR was to, alongside an understanding of current developments, understand gaps in the literature for further research. Further research in these areas should ultimately lead to the creation of a low-cost, portable sensing device that can be used for its chosen analyte to combat crime by its mass manufacture and deployment. Considerations of long-term storage, matrix tolerance and approval from law enforcement agencies will be vital.
5.2.4 Global megatrend
A global megatrend is a large-scale, sustained shift in major social, economic, environmental, technological, or geopolitical patterns that significantly transforms multiple industries and aspects of life over decades (PwC, 2025; META, 2016). This therefore makes it an important consideration when looking at further research into sensors to combat crime.
The global megatrend for sensors to combat crime encompass advancements in AI, IoT, and big data, which are enhancing the capabilities and integration of these technologies. Urbanization and connectivity improvements, particularly through 5G and cloud computing, are driving the adoption and effectiveness of sensors to combat crime. Economic, social, and environmental considerations further shape the development and deployment of these systems, highlighting the need for cost-effective, ethical, and resilient solutions in combating crime.
5.2.5 Sustainable development goals
The Sustainable Development Goals are pivotal in addressing global challenges by promoting equity and sustainability through interconnected goals and specific 2030 targets, thereby fostering international cooperation and accountability (United Nations, 2025). Therefore, considering these goals is essential when exploring further research into sensing devices to combat crime.
Research in this field not only drives technological advancements (Goal 9) but also contributes to achieving societal goals such as safety, justice, and sustainable urban development (Goals 11 and 16). Furthermore, ensuring the ethical deployment and use of sensor technologies aligns with the overarching principles of sustainable development, emphasizing inclusivity, safety, and justice for all (Goal 17).
5.2.6 Emerging technologies
Rapid advancements in sensor technology mean that newer studies may use more advanced sensors not covered in older reviews. Keeping reviews up-to-date with the latest technologies and applications is challenging but crucial. Whilst this SR aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of sensing technologies for combating crime, future reviews may benefit from focusing separately on specific target analytes to achieve a more nuanced understanding and detailed analysis.
Statements
Author contributions
AC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SJ: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. T-CL: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the EPSRC and Dawes Centre for Future crimes at UCL, grant reference number (EP/N509577/1 and EP/T517793/1).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the EPSRC, the Dawes Centre for Future Crimes at UCL and the Institute for Materials Discovery that funded and supported the research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2025.1568867/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
1.^TargetZero is an initiative to reduce the number of traffic deaths and serious injuries to zero by 2030.
References
1
Abdelkader M. Elmanzalawy M. Pauliukaite R. (2022). 3-D electrodes for electrochemical sensors: review in different approaches. IEEE Sens. J.22 (24), 23620–23632. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3220815
2
Abd-Elsabour M. Alsoghier H. M. Alhamzani A. G. Abou-Krisha M. M. Yousef T. A. Assaf H. F. (2022). A novel electrochemical sensor for detection of nicotine in tobacco products based on graphene oxide nanosheets conjugated with (1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid) modified glassy carbon electrode. Nanomaterials12 (14), 2354. 10.3390/nano12142354
3
Abdollahi A. Dashti A. Rahmanidoust M. Hanaei N. (2022). Metal-free and ecofriendly photoluminescent nanoparticles for visualization of latent fingerprints, anticounterfeiting, and information encryption. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL372, 132649. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132649
4
Abdulhussein S. K. Al-Kazazz F. F. M. Rheima A. M. (2022). The role of nanomaterials in the recent development of electrochemical biosensors. Port. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA41 (3), 211–221. 10.4152/pea.2023410303
5
Abel R. J. Zadora G. Sandercock P. M. L. Harynuk J. J. (2018). Modern instrumental limits of identification of ignitable liquids in forensic fire debris analysis. Separations5 (4), 58. 10.3390/separations5040058
6
Abnous K. Abdolabadi A. K. Ramezani M. Alibolandi M. Nameghi M. A. Zavvar T. et al (2022). A highly sensitive electrochemical aptasensor for cocaine detection based on CRISPR-Cas12a and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase as signal amplifiers. Talanta241, 123276. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123276
7
Abramson A. (2021). Substance use during the pandemic. Am. Psychol. Assoc.52 (2), 22. Available online at:https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/03/substance-use-pandemic.
8
Abuzalat O. Wong D. Park S. S. Kim S. (2020). Highly selective and sensitive fluorescent zeolitic imidazole frameworks sensor for nitroaromatic explosive detection. Nanoscale.12 (25), 13523–13530. 10.1039/d0nr01653e
9
Açikgöz G. Hamamci B. (2020). Determination of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in blood samples using partial least squares discriminant analysis applied to surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc.106, 103012. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2019.103012
10
Adedara I. A. Mohammed K. A. Da-Silva O. F. Salaudeen F. A. Gonçalves F. L. S. Rosemberg D. B. et al (2022). Utility of cockroach as a model organism in the assessment of toxicological impacts of environmental pollutants. Environ. Adv.8, 100195. 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100195
11
Adegoke O. Nic Daeid N. (2021). Colorimetric optical nanosensors for trace explosive detection using metal nanoparticles: advances, pitfalls, and future perspective. Emerg. Top. Life Sci.5, 367–379. 10.1042/etls20200281
12
Adegoke O. Nsuamani M. L. Daeid N. N. (2023). Cadmium-free silica-encapsulated molecularly imprinted AuZnCeSeS quantum dots nanocomposite as an ultrasensitive fluorescence nanosensor for methamphetamine detection. Mater Sci. Semicond. Process159, 107387. 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107387
13
Adegoke O. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. (2020). Biomimetic graphene oxide-cationic multi-shaped gold nanoparticle-hemin hybrid nanozyme: tuning enhanced catalytic activity for the rapid colorimetric apta-biosensing of amphetamine-type stimulants. Talanta216, 120990. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120990
14
Adegoke O. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. (2022). Fabrication of a near-infrared fluorescence-emitting SiO2-AuZnFeSeS quantum dots-molecularly imprinted polymer nanocomposite for the ultrasensitive fluorescence detection of levamisole. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS646, 129013. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129013
15
Adhikary R. R. Banerjee R. (2021). Development of smart core-shell nanoparticle-based sensors for the point-of-care detection of alpha amylase in diagnostics and forensics. Biosens. Bioelectron.184, 113244. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113244
16
Ahamed S. Mahato M. Tohora N. Sultana T. Sahoo R. Ghanta S. et al (2023). A PET and ESIPT-communicated ratiometric, turn-on chromo-fluorogenic sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of sarin gas mimic, diethylchlorophosphate. Talanta.258, 124448. 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124448
17
Ahmed I. Elsherif M. Park S. Yetisen A. K. Butt H. (2022). Nanostructured photonic hydrogels for real-time alcohol detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater5 (6), 7744–7753. 10.1021/acsanm.2c00576
18
Ahmed S. R. Chand R. Kumar S. Mittal N. Srinivasan S. Rajabzadeh A. R. (2020). Recent biosensing advances in the rapid detection of illicit drugs. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.131, 116006. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116006
19
Akçan R. Yildirim M. S. Ilhan H. Güven B. Tamer U. Saglam N. (2020). Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a novel tool for rapid quantification of heroin and metabolites in saliva. Turk J. Med. Sci.50 (5), 1470–1479. 10.3906/sag-1912-196
20
Akgönüllü S. Battal D. Yalcin M. S. Yavuz H. Denizli A. (2020). Rapid and sensitive detection of synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018, JWH-073 and their metabolites using molecularly imprinted polymer-coated QCM nanosensor in artificial saliva. Microchem. J.153, 104454. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104454
21
Alberti G. Zanoni C. Spina S. Magnaghi L. R. Biesuz R. (2023). Trends in molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)-Based plasmonic sensors. CHEMOSENSORS11 (2), 144. 10.3390/chemosensors11020144
22
Alder R. Hong J. M. Chow E. Fang J. H. Isa F. Ashford B. et al (2021). Application of plasma-printed paper-based SERS substrate for cocaine detection. SENSORS21 (3), 810. 10.3390/s21030810
23
Aleknavicene I. Pabreza E. Talaikis M. Jankunec M. Raciukaitis G. (2022). Low-cost SERS substrate featuring laser-ablated amorphous nanostructure. Appl. Surf. Sci.571, 151248. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151248
24
Alhaddad M. Sheta S. M. (2020). Dual naked-eye and optical chemosensor for morphine detection in biological real samples based on Cr(III) metal–organic framework nanoparticles. ACS Omega5 (43), 28296–28304. 10.1021/acsomega.0c04249
25
Al-Hetlani E. D’Cruz B. Amin M. O. (2020). A 3D miniaturized solid-state chemiluminescence sensor based on ruthenium functionalized polymeric monolith for the detection of pharmaceutical drugs. J. Mater Sci.55 (27), 13232–13243. 10.1007/s10853-020-04974-z
26
Almabadi M. H. Truta F. M. Adamu G. Cowen T. Tertis M. Alanazi K. D. M. et al (2023). Integration of smart nanomaterials for highly selective disposable sensors and their forensic applications in amphetamine determination. Electrochim Acta446, 142009. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142009
27
Alomar T. S. AlMasoud N. Xu Y. Lima C. Akbali B. Maher S. et al (2022). Simultaneous multiplexed quantification of banned Sudan dyes using surface enhanced Raman scattering and chemometrics. SENSORS22 (20), 7832. 10.3390/s22207832
28
Alonzo M. Alder R. Clancy L. Fu S. L. (2022). Portable testing techniques for the analysis of drug materials. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.4 (6). 10.1002/wfs2.1461
29
Alves T. M. R. Deroco P. B. Wachholz D. J. Vidotto L. H. B. Kubota L. T. (2021). Wireless wearable electrochemical sensors: a review. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.8 (31), 22–50. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.rv-62-2020
30
Amalraj A. Narayanan M. Perumal P. (2022). Highly efficient peroxidase-like activity of a metal-oxide-incorporated CeO2-MIL(Fe) metal-organic framework and its application in the colorimetric detection of melamine and mercury ions via induced hydrogen and covalent bonds. ANALYST.147 (14), 3234–3247. 10.1039/d2an00864e
31
Ameen A. Brown K. Dennany L. (2022). Can synthetic cannabinoids be reliably screened with electrochemistry? An assessment of the ability to screen for synthetic cannabinoids STS-135 and BB-22 within a single sample matrix. J. Electroanal. Chem.909, 116141. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116141
32
Ameen A. Russell H. Dennany L. L. (2020). Voltammetry as a rapid screening method for NPS identification. Proc. SPIE11540, 121–126. 10.1117/12.2573507
33
Ameku W. A. Gonçalves J. M. Ataide V. N. Santos M. S. F. Gutz I. G. R. Araki K. et al (2021). Combined colorimetric and electrochemical measurement paper-based device for chemometric proof-of-concept analysis of cocaine samples. ACS Omega6 (1), 594–605. 10.1021/acsomega.0c05077
34
Amini K. Sepehrifard A. Valinasabpouri A. Safruk J. Angelone D. Lourenco T. D. (2022). Recent advances in electrochemical sensor technologies for THC detection-a narrative review. J. Cannabis Res.4 (1), 12. 10.1186/s42238-022-00122-3
35
Amiri M. Imanzadeh H. Sefid-Sefidehkhan Y. (2021). An overview on electrochemical sensors based on nanomaterials for the determination of drugs of abuse. Curr. Drug Deliv.18 (2), 162–183. 10.2174/1567201817666200520084835
36
Amr A. E. E. Kamel A. H. Almehizia A. A. Sayed A. Y. A. Abd-Rabboh H. S. M. (2021). Solid-contact potentiometric sensors based on main-tailored bio-mimics for trace detection of harmine hallucinogen in urine specimens. MOLECULES26 (2), 324. 10.3390/molecules26020324
37
Anfossi L. Di Nardo F. Russo A. Cavalera S. Giovannoli C. Spano G. et al (2018). Silver and gold nanoparticles as multi-chromatic lateral flow assay probes for the detection of food allergens. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.411 (9), 1905–1913. 10.1007/s00216-018-1451-6
38
Anjali K. G. Jibin K. V. Aswathy P. V. Shanty A. A. Shijo F. Dhanya T. M. et al (2022). An imidazole ligated zinc(II) transition metal complex as a “turn-off” fluorescent sensor for the selective and sensitive detection of brilliant blue FCF. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY433, 114134. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114134
39
Ansari A. A. A. Aldajani K. M. M. AlHazaa A. N. N. Albrithen H. A. A. (2022). Recent progress of fluorescent materials for fingermarks detection in forensic science and anti-counterfeiting. Coord. Chem. Rev.462, 214523. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214523
40
Anvari L. Ghoreishi S. M. Faridbod F. Ganjali M. R. (2021). Electrochemical determination of methamphetamine in human plasma on a nanoceria nanoparticle decorated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Anal. Lett.54 (15), 2509–2522. 10.1080/00032719.2021.1875229
41
Anvari L. Ghoreishi S. M. Khoshnevisan K. Ganjali M. R. Faridbod F. (2023). Methamphetamine determination using label-free impedimetric aptasensor based on ceria nanocomposite. J. Appl. Electrochem53 (9), 1843–1851. 10.1007/s10800-023-01880-5
42
Anzar N. Suleman S. Parvez S. Narang J. (2022). A review on Illicit drugs and biosensing advances for its rapid detection. PROCESS Biochem.113, 113–124. 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.12.021
43
Apak R. Üzer A. Saglam S. Arman A. (2023). Selective electrochemical detection of explosives with nanomaterial based electrodes. Electroanalysis35 (1). 10.1002/elan.202200175
44
Arman A. Saglam S. Üzer A. Apak R. (2022). Electrochemical determination of nitroaromatic explosives using glassy carbon/multi walled carbon nanotube/polyethyleneimine electrode coated with gold nanoparticles. Talanta238, 122990. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122990
45
Assis A. M. L. Costa C. V. Alves M. S. Melo J. C. S. de Oliveira V. R. Tonholo J. et al (2023). From nanomaterials to macromolecules: innovative technologies for latent fingerprint development. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.5 (2). 10.1002/wfs2.1475
46
Ataide V. N. Mendes L. F. Gama LILM de A. W. R. Paixão TRLC (2020). Electrochemical paper-based analytical devices: ten years of development. Anal. Methods12 (8), 1030–1054. 10.1039/c9ay02350j
47
Atik G. Kilic N. M. Horzum N. Odaci D. Timur S. (2023). Antibody-Conjugated electrospun nanofibers for electrochemical detection of methamphetamine. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces15 (20), 24109–24119. 10.1021/acsami.3c02266
48
Atta S. Tuan V. D. (2023). Ultra-trace SERS detection of cocaine and heroin using bimetallic gold-silver nanostars (BGNS-Ag). Anal. Chim. Acta.1251, 340956. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340956
49
Atta S. Vo-Dinh T. (2023). A hybrid plasmonic nanoprobe using polyvinylpyrrolidone-capped bimetallic silver-gold nanostars for highly sensitive and reproducible solution-based SERS sensing. ANALYST.148 (8), 1786–1796. 10.1039/d2an01876d
50
Author Anonymous (2025a). Drug categories and their common effects – the wise drive. Available online at:https://www.thewisedrive.com/drug-categories-and-their-common-effects/.
51
Author Anonymous (2025b). NSDUH national releases. Available online at:https://www.samhsa.gov/data/nsduh/national-releases.
52
Aydindogan E. Balaban S. Evran S. Coskunol H. Timur S. (2019). A bottom-up approach for developing aptasensors for abused drugs: biosensors in forensics. Biosens. (Basel).9 (4), 118. 10.3390/bios9040118
53
Azimi S. Docoslis A. (2022). Recent advances in the use of surface-enhanced Raman scattering for illicit drug detection. SENSORS22 (10), 3877. 10.3390/s22103877
54
Azman A. Mahat N. Wahab R. Ahmad W. Puspanadan J. Huri M. et al (2021). Box-Behnken design optimisation of a green novel nanobio-based reagent for rapid visualisation of latent fingerprints on wet, non-porous substrates. Biotechnol. Lett.43 (4), 881–898. 10.1007/s10529-020-03052-3
55
Badawy S. M. (2020). Semi-quantitative analysis of drugs of abuse in human urine by end-point dilution flow immunochromatographic assay. JPC – J. Planar Chromatogr. – Mod. TLC33 (4), 419–425. 10.1007/s00764-020-00041-0
56
Badshah M. A. Koh N. Y. Zia A. W. Abbas N. Zahra Z. Saleem M. W. (2020). Recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures for metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensing. Nanomaterials10 (9), 1749. 10.3390/nano10091749
57
Baghban H. N. Hasanzadeh M. Liu Y. Q. Seidi F. (2022). A portable colorimetric chemosensing regime for ractopamine in chicken samples using μPCD decorated by silver nanoprisms. RSC Adv.12 (39), 25675–25686. 10.1039/d2ra04793d
58
Bai L. (2022). RETRACTED: electrochemical behavior of salbutamol, clenbuterol, ractopamine and albuterol at CNTs/GCE. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (5), 220567. 10.20964/2022.05.67
59
Balaban S. Man E. Durmus C. Bor G. Ceylan A. E. Gumus Z. P. et al (2020). Sensor platform with a custom-tailored aptamer for diagnosis of synthetic cannabinoids. Electroanalysis32 (3), 656–665. 10.1002/elan.201900670
60
Balaji R. Renganathan V. Chen S. M. Singh V. (2020). Ingenious design and development of recyclable 2D BiOCl nanotiles attached tri-functional robust strips for high performance selective electrochemical sensing, SERS and heterogenous dip catalysis. Chem. Eng. J.385, 123974. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123974
61
Bandey H. L. Gibson A. P. (2006). Investigation, enforcement and protection sector fingerprint development and imaging newsletter: special edition the powders process, study 2: evaluation of fingerprint powders on smooth surfaces authors. Available online at:www.hosdb.homeoffice.gov.uk.
62
Baracu A. M. Gugoasa L. A. D. (2021). Review—recent advances in microfabrication, design and applications of amperometric sensors and biosensors. J. Electrochem Soc.168 (3), 037503. 10.1149/1945-7111/abe8b6
63
Barveen N. R. Wang T. J. Chang Y. H. (2021). Photochemical decoration of silver nanoparticles on silver vanadate nanorods as an efficient SERS probe for ultrasensitive detection of chloramphenicol residue in real samples. Chemosphere275, 130115. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130115
64
Basterrechea D. A. Rocher J. Parra L. Lloret J. (2021). Low-cost system based on optical sensor to monitor discharge of industrial oil in irrigation ditches. SENSORS21 (16), 5449. 10.3390/s21165449
65
Batool M. Afzal Z. Junaid H. M. Solangi A. R. Hassan A. (2022b). Sulfonamides as optical chemosensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 954–981. 10.1080/10408347.2022.2105135
66
Batool R. Riaz N. Junaid H. M. Waseem M. T. Khan Z. A. Nawazish S. et al (2022a). Fluorene-based fluorometric and colorimetric conjugated polymers for sensitive detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol explosive in aqueous medium. ACS Omega7 (1), 1057–1070. 10.1021/acsomega.1c05644
67
Bazin I. Tria S. A. Hayat A. Marty J. L. (2017). New biorecognition molecules in biosensors for the detection of toxins. Biosens. Bioelectron.87, 285–298. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.06.083
68
Bazzi F. Ebrahimi-Hoseinzadeh B. Sangachin E. A. Hosseini M. (2023). The integration of hybridization chain reaction (HCR) with fluorogenic silver nanoclusters (AgNCs) in an aggregation induced emission (AIE)-based nanosensor for sex determination and its forensic application. Microchem. J.185, 108188. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108188
69
Behyar M. B. Shadjou N. (2021). d-Penicillamine functionalized dendritic fibrous nanosilica (DFNS-DPA): synthesise and its application as an innovative advanced nanomaterial towards sensitive quantification of ractopamine. RSC Adv.11 (48), 30206–30214. 10.1039/d1ra05655g
70
Bener M. Sen F. B. Apak R. (2022). Protamine gold nanoclusters - based fluorescence turn-on sensor for rapid determination of Trinitrotoluene (TNT). SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc., 279. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121462
71
Bever C. S. Adams C. A. Hnasko R. M. Cheng L. W. Stanker L. H. (2020). Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for the detection of lethal amatoxins from mushrooms. PLoS One15 (4), e0231781. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231781
72
Bhagat D. S. Suryawanshi I. V. Gurnule W. B. Sawant S. S. Chavan P. B. (2019). Greener synthesis of CuO nanoparticles for enhanced development of latent fingerprints. Mater Today Proc.36, 747–750. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.357
73
Bhalla N. Jolly P. Formisano N. Estrela P. (2016). Introduction to biosensors. Essays Biochem.60 (1), 1–8. 10.1042/ebc20150001
74
Bhati K. Tripathy D. B. Kumaravel V. Sudhani H. P. K. Ali S. Choudhary R. et al (2023). Sensitive fingerprint detection using biocompatible mesoporous silica nanoparticle coating on non-porous surfaces. COATINGS13 (2), 268. 10.3390/coatings13020268
75
Bilge S. Dogan-Topal B. Gürbüz M. M. Yücel A. Sinag A. Ozkan S. A. (2022). Recent advances in electrochemical sensing of cocaine: a review. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.157, 116768. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116768
76
Blythe J. M. Johnson S. D. (2019). A systematic review of crime facilitated by the consumer Internet of Things. Secur. J.34, 97–125. 10.1057/s41284-019-00211-8
77
Bollella P. Katz E. (2020). Biosensors special issue: the potential of (bio)sensors for the forensic. Sciences9 (4). Available online at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/biosensors/special_issues/F_sci.
78
Borgul P. Pawlak P. Rudnicki K. Sipa K. Krzyczmonik P. Trynda A. et al (2021). Ephedrine sensing at the electrified liquid-liquid interface supported with micro-punched self-adhesive polyimide film. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL344, 130286. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130286
79
Borgul P. Sobczak K. Rudnicki K. Glazer P. Pawlak P. Trynda A. et al (2022b). Electrochemical behavior of cocaine cutting agents at the polarized liquid-liquid interface. Electrochim Acta402, 139553. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139553
80
Borgul P. Sobczak K. Rudnicki K. Leniart A. Skrzypek S. L. Poltorak L. (2022a). Oxidized thin aluminum films used as the polarized liquid-liquid interface support for norcocaine detection. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL373, 132651. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132651
81
Borgul P. Sobczak K. Sipa K. Rudnicki K. Skrzypek S. Trynda A. et al (2022c). Heroin detection in a droplet hosted in a 3D printed support at the miniaturized electrified liquid-liquid interface. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 18615. 10.1038/s41598-022-21689-0
82
Boroujerdi R. Abdelkader A. Paul R. (2020). State of the art in alcohol sensing with 2D materials. Nanomicro Lett.12 (1), 33. 10.1007/s40820-019-0363-0
83
Boroujerdi R. Abdelkader A. Paul R. (2022a). Highly sensitive and selective detection of the antidepressant amitriptyline using a functionalised graphene-based sensor. CHEMNANOMAT8 (10). 10.1002/cnma.202200209
84
Boroujerdi R. Paul R. (2022a). Introducing graphene-indium oxide electrochemical sensor for detecting ethanol in aqueous samples with CCD-RSM optimization. CHEMOSENSORS10 (2), 42. 10.3390/chemosensors10020042
85
Boroujerdi R. Paul R. (2022b). Graphene-based electrochemical sensors for psychoactive drugs. NANOMATERIALS12 (13), 2250. 10.3390/nano12132250
86
Boroujerdi R. Paul R. Abdelkader A. (2022b). Rapid detection of amitriptyline in dried blood and dried saliva samples with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sensors22 (21), 8257. 10.3390/s22218257
87
Bouaziz L. Boulahlib S. Ozacar M. Si-Ahmed K. Bessekhouad Y. (2022). Effect of Iodine-doping toward ZnO critical optical constants and their applications to latent fingerprints detection. Mater Today Commun.31, 103450. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103450
88
Bräuer B. Unger C. Werner M. Lieberzeit P. A. (2021). Biomimetic sensors to detect bioanalytes in real-life samples using molecularly imprinted polymers: a review. SENSORS21 (16), 5550. 10.3390/s21165550
89
Brenes J. P. Arroyo-Mora L. E. Barquero-Quirós M. (2022). Enzymatic inhibitive determination of AB-Fubinaca and AB-Pinaca on screen printed carbon tetratiofulvalene electrodes modified with nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Sens. Biosensing Res.38, 100515. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100515
90
Brown K. Allan P. Francis P. S. Dennany L. (2020). Psychoactive substances and how to find them: electrochemiluminescence as a strategy for identification and differentiation of drug species. J. Electrochem Soc.167 (16), 166502. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc9db
91
Brown K. Dennany L. (2022). Electrochemiluminescence sensors and forensic investigations: a viable technique for drug detection?PURE Appl. Chem.94 (5), 535–545. 10.1515/pac-2021-1204
92
Bruijns B. Tiggelaar R. Gardeniers H. (2020). A microfluidic approach for biosensing DNA within forensics. Appl. Sci.10 (20), 7067. 10.3390/app10207067
93
Bruner E. Monjardez G. (2023). Development of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy evidence swabs using a silver nanoparticle biosynthesis for the detection of animal blood. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.54 (3), 238–244. 10.1002/jrs.6479
94
Bumbrah G. S. Jani M. Bhagat D. S. Dalal K. Kaushal A. Sadhana K. et al (2022). Zinc oxide nanoparticles for detection of latent fingermarks on nonporous surfaces. Mater Chem. Phys.278, 125660. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125660
95
Burr D. S. Fatigante W. L. Lartey J. A. Jang W. G. Stelmack A. R. McClurg N. W. et al (2020). Integrating SERS and PSI-ms with dual purpose plasmonic paper substrates for on-site illicit drug confirmation. Anal. Chem.92 (9), 6676–6683. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00562
96
Byzova N. A. Serchenya T. S. Vashkevich I. I. Zherdev A. V. Sviridov O. V. Dzantiev B. B. (2020). Lateral flow immunoassay for rapid qualitative and quantitative control of the veterinary drug bacitracin in milk. Microchem. J.156, 104884. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104884
97
Cai Q. R. Mateti S. Jiang H. B. Li L. H. Huang S. M. Chen Y. (2022a). Boron nitride nanosheets for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Mater. TODAY Phys.22, 100575. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100575
98
Cai Y. Hou T. T. Wang C. Y. Tang Y. H. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang D. T. et al (2022b). Fluorescence enhancement of dicyanomethylene-4H-pyran derivatives in solid state for visualization of latent fingerprints. Front. Chem.10, 943925. 10.3389/fchem.2022.943925
99
Calabretta M. M. Montali L. Lopreside A. Fragapane F. Iacoangeli F. Roda A. et al (2021). Ultrasensitive on-field luminescence detection using a low-cost silicon photomultiplier device. Anal. Chem.93 (20), 7388–7393. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00899
100
Canoura J. Liu Y. Z. Perry J. Willis C. Xiao Y. (2023). Suite of aptamer-based sensors for the detection of fentanyl and its analogues. ACS Sens.8 (5), 1901–1911. 10.1021/acssensors.2c02463
101
Cao H. Y. Cai Z. Z. Li Y. S. Wang G. F. Dou X. C. (2022). Colorimetric-fluorescent dual-mode sensing of peroxide explosives based on inner filter effect with boosted sensitivity and selectivity. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.50 (1), 4–12. 10.1016/j.cjac.2021.10.002
102
Cardoso R. M. Rocha D. P. Rocha R. G. Stefano J. S. Silva R. A. B. Richter E. M. et al (2020). 3D-printing pen versus desktop 3D-printers: fabrication of carbon black/polylactic acid electrodes for single-drop detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Anal. Chim. Acta1132, 10–19. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.034
103
Carvalho R. M. Pedao E. R. Guerbas F. M. R. Tronchini M. P. Ferreira V. S. Petroni J. M. et al (2023). Electrochemical study and forensic electroanalysis of fungicide benzovindiflupyr using disposable graphite pencil electrode. Talanta252, 123873. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123873
104
Castro A. S. Rodrigues C. H. P. de Menezes M. M. T. da Silva A. B. D. Bruni A. T. de Oliveira M. F. (2021). Fe(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Co(II) salen Schiff base complexes: proposal for a voltammetric sensor to analyze cocaine hydrochloride and its interferents. FORENSIC Chem.25, 100347. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100347
105
Castro S. V. F. Lima A. P. Rocha R. G. Cardoso R. M. Montes R. H. O. Santana M. H. P. et al (2020). Simultaneous determination of lead and antimony in gunshot residue using a 3D-printed platform working as sampler and sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta1130, 126–136. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.033
106
Castro S. V. F. Rocha R. G. Joao A. F. Richter E. M. Munoz R. A. A. (2022). Promising applications of additive-manufactured (3D-printed) electrochemical sensors for forensic chemistry. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.9 (34), 79–105. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.RV-50-2021
107
Catalan-Carrio R. Moreno-Sanz G. Basabe-Desmonts L. Benito-Lopez F. (2021). “Ionogel based material for the colorimetric detection of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol,” in Italian national conference on sensors.
108
Cellmark (2025a). Fire investigation//cellmark. Available online at: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/services/forensic-casework/fire-investigation/.
109
Cellmark (2025b). Gun shot residue GSR analysis//cellmark. Available online at: https://www.cellmarkforensics.co.uk/services/forensic-casework/gunshot-residue/.
110
CENSUS (2023). Crime in england and wales. Newport, United Kingdom: Office for National Statistics. Available online at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingdecember2023.
111
Ceto X. Bonet-San-Emeterio M. Ortiz-Aguayo D. Rodriguez-Franch E. Del Valle M. (2022). Experiences in the detection of drugs of abuse in smuggling seizures and forensic samples using electronic tongue principles. Int. Symposium Olfaction Electron. Nose, ISOEN 2022 - Proc., 1–4. 10.1109/isoen54820.2022.9789611
112
Cevallos-Cedeño R. E. Agulló C. Abad-Fuentes A. Abad-Somovilla A. Mercader J. V. (2021). Enzyme and lateral flow monoclonal antibody-based immunoassays to simultaneously determine spirotetramat and spirotetramat-enol in foodstuffs. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 1–13. 10.1038/s41598-021-81432-z
113
Chadha U. Bhardwaj P. Agarwal R. Rawat P. Agarwal R. Gupta I. et al (2022). Recent progress and growth in biosensors technology: a critical review. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.109, 21–51. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.02.010
114
Chaiendoo K. Ngamdee K. Limbut W. Saiyasombat C. Busayaporn W. Ittisanronnachai S. et al (2021). Gold nanoparticle-based cascade reaction-triggered fluorogenicity for highly selective nitrite ion detection in forensic samples. Microchem. J.168, 106470. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106470
115
Chakraborty M. Prusti B. Chakravarty M. (2022). Small electron-rich isomeric solid-state emitters with variation in coplanarity and molecular packings: rapid and ultralow recognition of TNT. ACS Appl. Electron Mat.4 (5), 2481–2489. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c00241
116
Chang R. Wang T. Liu Q. Tang J. Wu D. L. (2022b). Ag Nanoparticles@Agar gel as a 3D flexible and stable SERS substrate with ultrahigh sensitivity. LANGMUIR.38 (45), 13822–13832. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01966
117
Chang Y. L. Su C. J. Lu L. C. Wan D. H. (2022a). Aluminum plasmonic nanoclusters for paper-based surface- enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem.94 (47), 16319–16327. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03014
118
Chedid A. A. Azevedo L. S. Galaço A. Casagrande T. R. Serra O. A. de Oliveira M. F. (2023). Voltammetric analysis of luminescent markers in gunshot residues. J. Forensic Sci.68 (3), 780–789. 10.1111/1556-4029.15236
119
Che Marzuki N. H. Mahat N. A. Huyop F. Aboul-Enein H. Y. Wahab R. A. (2015). Sustainable production of the emulsifier methyl oleate by Candida rugosa lipase nanoconjugates. Food Bioprod. Process.96, 211–220. 10.1016/j.fbp.2015.08.005
120
Chen C. H. Wang C. C. Ko P. Y. Chen L. Y. (2020c). Nanomaterial-based adsorbents and optical sensors for illicit drug analysis. J. Food Drug Anal.28, 655–677. 10.38212/2224-6614.1137
121
Chen H. Wu F. S. Xu Y. B. Liu Y. Song L. Chen X. J. et al (2021a). Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of selective molecularly imprinted polymers for the fast determination of synthetic cathinones. RSC Adv.11 (47), 29752–29761. 10.1039/d1ra01330k
122
Chen M. Burn P. L. Shaw P. E. (2023d). Luminescence-based detection and identification of illicit drugs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25 (19), 13244–13259. 10.1039/d3cp00524k
123
Chen M. Huang Y. Q. Miao J. J. Fan Y. X. Lai K. Q. (2023c). A highly sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor with MIL-100 (Fe)/Au composites for detection of malachite green in fish pond water. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.292, 122432. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122432
124
Chen Q. Liu J. X. Liu S. J. Zhang J. He L. F. Liu R. Y. et al (2023a). Visual and rapid detection of nerve agent mimics in gas and solution phase by a simple fluorescent probe. Anal. Chem.95, 4390–4394. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04891
125
Chen Q. Qie M. Peng X. Chen Y. Wang Y. (2020a). Immunochromatographic assay for melamine based on luminescent quantum dot beads as signaling probes. RSC Adv.10 (6), 3307–3313. 10.1039/c9ra08350b
126
Chen S. J. Zhu Y. T. Han J. Zhang T. Y. Chou R. W. Liu A. P. et al (2023b). Construction of a molecularly imprinted sensor modified with tea branch biochar and its rapid detection of norfloxacin residues in animal-derived foods. FOODS12 (3), 544. 10.3390/foods12030544
127
Chen T. H. Jiang L. R. Hou J. T. Wang W. Zeng L. T. Bao G. M. (2020b). A portable chromogenic and fluorogenic membrane sensor for ultrasensitive, specific and instantaneous visualizing of lethal phosgene. J. Mater Chem. A Mater8 (46), 24695–24702. 10.1039/d0ta08333j
128
Chen X. Z. Jia L. Zhang L. A. Li Y. X. Xu J. (2022). Stimulus response of HNT-CDs-Eu nano-sensor: toward visual point-of-care monitoring of a bacterial spore biomarker with hypersensitive multi-color agarose gel based analytical device. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS639, 128356. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128356
129
Chen Y. C. Hong S. W. Wu H. H. S. Wang Y. L. Chen Y. F. (2021b). Rapid Formation of nanoclusters for detection of drugs in urine using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. NANOMATERIALS11 (7), 1789. 10.3390/nano11071789
130
Cheng J. Fan M. D. Wang P. L. Su X. O. (2020). The twice-oxidized graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles composite SERS substrate for sensitive detection of clenbuterol residues in animal-origin food samples. Food Anal. Methods13 (4), 902–910. 10.1007/s12161-020-01709-3
131
Cheng W. W. Tang X. Z. Zhang Y. Wu D. Yang W. J. (2021). Applications of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based sensors for food safety: enhancing mechanisms and recent advances. Trends Food Sci. Technol.112, 268–282. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.004
132
Chengyi H. Sishi Y. Chenying D. Chenyue W. Chen L. Huang Z. (2020). Sensitive and on-site detection of glyphosate based on papain-stabilized fluorescent gold nanoclusters. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (29), 8177–8184. 10.1007/s00216-020-02952-7
133
Chiang C. Lee H. Chen B. Lin Y. C. Chao Y. Huang Y. (2019). Using ambient mass spectrometry and LC-MS/MS for the rapid detection and identification of multiple illicit street drugs. J. Food Drug Anal.27 (2), 439–450. 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.11.003
134
Chio W. I. K. Liu J. Jones T. Perumal J. Dinish U. S. Parkin I. P. et al (2021). SERS multiplexing of methylxanthine drug isomers via host-guest size matching and machine learning. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (37), 12624–12632. 10.1039/d1tc02004h
135
Chisum W. J. Turvey B. E. (2011). Crime reconstruction. 2nd ed.Academic Press.
136
Cho S. Kim Y. (2022). Donor-acceptor Stenhouse adduct formation for the simple and rapid colorimetric detection of amphetamine-type stimulants. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL355, 131274. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131274
137
Choinska M. K. Sestakova I. Hrdlicka V. Skopalova J. Langmaier J. Maier V. et al (2022). Electroanalysis of fentanyl and its new analogs: a review. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (1), 26. 10.3390/bios12010026
138
Chu H. W. Unnikrishnan B. Anand A. Lin Y. W. Huang C. C. (2020). Carbon quantum dots for the detection of antibiotics and pesticides. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 540–558. 10.38212/2224-6614.1269
139
Clarke V. Braun V. (2017). Thematic analysis. J. Posit. Psychol.12 (3), 297–298. 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
140
Cockbain E. Bowers K. Dimitrova G. (2018). Human trafficking for labour exploitation: the results of a two-phase systematic review mapping the European evidence base and synthesising key scientific research evidence. J. Exp. Criminol.14 (3), 319–360. 10.1007/s11292-017-9321-3
141
Coleparmer (2025). Ultraviolet equipment from cole-parmer United Kingdom. Available online at: https://www.coleparmer.co.uk/c/ultraviolet-equipment.
142
College of Policing (2017). Forensics. Available online at: https://www.college.police.uk/app/investigation/forensics.
143
Cook S. Honeychurch K. C. (2021). Forensic electrochemical presumptive blood test based on the voltammetric behaviour of methylene blue and whole blood. Anal. METHODS13 (42), 4985–4993. 10.1039/d1ay01358k
144
Corporate Report (2022). Forensic Information Databases annual report 2021 to 2022 (accessible version) - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022-accessible-version.
145
Corporate Report (2023). Forensic Information Databases annual report 2021 to 2022 (accessible version) - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022/forensic-information-databases-annual-report-2021-to-2022-accessible-version.
146
Costa B. M. F. Freitas D. V. Sousa F. L. N. Silva K. D. Dias J. M. M. Assis A. M. L. et al (2020). SATS@CdTe hierarchical structures emitting green to red colors developed for latent fingerprint applications. DYES PIGMENTS180, 108483. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108483
147
Costanzo H. Gooch J. Frascione N. (2023). Nanomaterials for optical biosensors in forensic analysis. Talanta253, 123945. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123945
148
Couto R. A. S. Coelho C. Mounssef B. Morais S. F. D. Lima C. D. dos Santos W. T. P. et al (2021). 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) sensing based on electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers on silver nanoparticles and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. NANOMATERIALS11 (2), 353. 10.3390/nano11020353
149
Couturier C. Wada A. Louis K. Mistretta M. Beitz B. Povogui M. et al (2020). Characterization and analytical validation of a new antigenic rapid diagnostic test for Ebola virus disease detection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.14 (1), e0007965. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007965
150
Cribbin T. F. (2011). “Citation Chain Aggregation: an interaction model to support citation cycling,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 2149–2152.
151
Criminal Damage and Arson Crime and Safety Statistics (2025). CrimeRate. Available online at: https://crimerate.co.uk/criminal-damage-arson.
152
Cupil-Garcia V. Strobbia P. Ran Y. Crawford B. M. Wang H. neng Zentella R. et al (2020). Fiberoptics SERS sensors using plasmonic nanostar probes for detection of molecular biotargets. spiedigitallibrary.Org.1125. 10.1117/12.2552993
153
Curtis V. Cairncross S. (2003). Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the community: a systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis.3 (5), 275–281. 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00606-6
154
Dagar M. Yadav S. Sai V. V. R. Satija J. Bhatia H. (2022). Emerging trends in point-of-care sensors for illicit drugs analysis. Talanta238, 123048. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123048
155
Dagnaw F. W. Feng W. Song Q. H. (2020). Selective and rapid detection of nerve agent simulants by polymer fibers with a fluorescent chemosensor in gas phase. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL318, 127937. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127937
156
Dahiwadkar R. Kumar H. Kanvah S. (2022). Detection of illicit GHB using AIE active fluorene containing α-Cyanostilbenes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY427, 113844. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113844
157
Dahiya K. Sharma H. Biswas L. Verma A. K. (2022). Nanotechnology in forensic science: extensive applications and new perspective. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys.59 (12), 1144–1147. 10.56042/ijbb.v59i12.67319
158
Dai S. J. Li Q. J. Li W. Zhang Y. D. Dou M. H. Xu R. M. et al (2022). Advances in functional photonic crystal materials for the analysis of chemical hazards in food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.21 (6), 4900–4920. 10.1111/1541-4337.13036
159
Dai Z. H. (2023). Recent advances in the development of portable electrochemical sensors for controlled substances. SENSORS23 (6), 3140. 10.3390/s23063140
160
Dang Q. M. Gilmore S. T. Lalwani K. Conk R. J. Simpson J. H. Leopold M. C. (2022). Monolayer-Protected gold nanoparticles functionalized with halogen bonding capability- an avenue for molecular detection schemes. LANGMUIR38 (16), 4747–4762. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00381
161
Dare E. O. Vendrell-Criado V. Jiménez M. C. Pérez-Ruiz R. Díaz D. D. (2020). Fluorescent-Labeled octasilsesquioxane nanohybrids as potential materials for latent fingerprinting detection. CHEMISTRY-A Eur. J.26 (58), 13142–13146. 10.1002/chem.202001908
162
Das M. K. Mishra T. Guria S. Das D. Sadhukhan J. Sarker S. et al (2022). Fluorometric detection of a chemical warfare agent mimic (DCP) using a simple hydroxybenzothiazole-diaminomaleonitrile based chemodosimeter. NEW J. Chem.47 (1), 250–257. 10.1039/d2nj04260f
163
Davis-Martin R. E. Alessi S. M. Boudreaux E. D. (2021). Alcohol use disorder in the age of technology: a review of wearable biosensors in alcohol use disorder treatment. Front. Psychiatry12, 642813. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642813
164
de Faria L. V. Rocha R. G. Arantes L. C. Ramos D. L. O. Lima C. D. Richter E. M. et al (2022). Cyclic square-wave voltammetric discrimination of the amphetamine-type stimulants MDA and MDMA in real-world forensic samples by 3D-printed carbon electrodes. Electrochim Acta429, 141002. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141002
165
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (2022). Fingermark visualisation source book v 3.0 the scientific rationale behind the processes within fingermark visualisation manual second edition 2022 fingermark visualisation source book v3.0. Available online at: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3.
166
de Lima L. F. de Araujo W. R. (2022). Laser-scribed graphene on polyetherimide substrate: an electrochemical sensor platform for forensic determination of xylazine in urine and beverage samples. Microchim. ACTA189 (12), 465. 10.1007/s00604-022-05566-1
167
DeMers H. L. He S. Pandit S. G. Hannah E. E. Zhang Z. Yan F. et al (2020). Development of an antigen detection assay for early point-of-care diagnosis of Zaire ebolavirus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.14 (11), e0008817. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008817
168
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2025). Emissions of air pollutants in the UK – particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) - GOV. London, United Kingdom: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-particulate-matter-pm10-and-pm25.
169
De Rycke E. Stove C. Dubruel P. De Saeger S. Beloglazova N. (2020). Recent developments in electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in diverse matrices. Biosens. Bioelectron.169, 112579. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112579
170
de Souza F. L. A. Amorim C. G. Araújo A. D. Satínsky D. Paim A. P. S. Montenegro M. (2022). Malachite green optical sensor based on electrospun polyimide nanofiber. CHEMOSENSORS10 (9), 348. 10.3390/chemosensors10090348
171
Dhar B. C. Roche C. E. Levine J. F. (2021). Developing mitochondrial DNA field-compatible tests. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.52, 3137–3177. 10.1080/10643389.2021.1904709
172
Dhiman S. Ahmad M. Kumar G. Luxami V. Singh P. Kumar S. (2021). Ratiometric chemosensor for differentiation of TNP from other NACs using distinct blue fluorescence and visualization of latent fingerprints. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (3), 1097–1106. 10.1039/d0tc04795c
173
Diamandis E. P. Christopoulos T. K. (1996). Immunoassay. Academic Press.
174
Dias B. C. Batista A. D. Petruci J. F. D. (2021). μOPTO: a microfluidic paper-based optoelectronic tongue as presumptive tests for the discrimination of alkaloid drugs for forensic purposes. Anal. Chim. Acta1187, 339141. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339141
175
Dief E. M. Hoffmann N. Darwish N. (2022). Electrochemical detection of dinitrobenzene on silicon electrodes: toward explosives sensors. SURFACES5 (1), 218–227. 10.3390/surfaces5010015
176
Díez-Pascual A. M. Cruz D. L. Redondo A. L. (2022). Advanced carbon-based polymeric nanocomposites for forensic analysis. Polym. (Basel)14 (17), 3598. 10.3390/polym14173598
177
Ding L. Peng D. Wang R. Li Q. (2021a). A user-secure and highly selective enhancement of latent fingerprints by magnetic composite powder based on carbon dot fluorescence. J. Alloys Compd.856, 158160. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158160
178
Ding N. N. Liu K. Qi Y. Y. Shang C. D. Chang X. M. Fang Y. (2021b). Methamphetamine detection enabled by a fluorescent carborane derivative of perylene monoimide in film state. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL340, 129964. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129964
179
Ding Y. R. Zhang N. Zhao J. Q. Lv H. Y. Wang X. Zhao B. et al (2022). Determination of antihypertensive drugs irbesartan and doxazosin mesylate in healthcare products and urine samples using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (27), 7813–7822. 10.1007/s00216-022-04315-w
180
Ding Z. X. Wang C. Song X. Li N. Zheng X. Y. Wang C. X. et al (2023). Strong π-metal interaction enables liquid interfacial nanoarray–molecule Co-assembly for Raman sensing of ultratrace fentanyl doped in heroin, ketamine, morphine, and real urine. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces15 (9), 12570–12579. 10.1021/acsami.2c22607
181
Divya V. Agrawal B. Srivastav A. Bhatt P. Bhowmik S. Agrawal Y. K. et al (2020). Fluorescent amphiphilic silica nanopowder for developing latent fingerprints. Aust. J. Forensic Sci.52 (3), 354–367. 10.1080/00450618.2018.1533036
182
Dokuzparmak E. Brown K. Dennany L. (2021). Electrochemiluminescent screening for methamphetamine metabolites. Analyst146 (10), 3336–3345. 10.1039/d1an00226k
183
Dragan A. M. Truta F. M. Tertis M. Florea A. Schram J. Cernat A. et al (2021). Electrochemical fingerprints of illicit drugs on graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Front. Chem.9, 641147. 10.3389/fchem.2021.641147
184
Dreier L. B. Kölbl C. Jeuk V. Beleites C. Köhntopp A. Duschek F. (2022). Setup and analysis of a mid-infrared stand-off system to detect traces of explosives on fabrics. Sensors22 (20), 7839. 10.3390/s22207839
185
Drug Testing Clinics (2025). “Drug and drink driving UK - a rising problem,”. United Kingdom: Drug Testing Clinics. Available online at: https://www.drugtestingclinics.co.uk/drug-and-drink-driving-a-problem-on-the-rise/.
186
DrugWipe (2025). DrugWipe is the premier drug test in the UK. Available online at: https://www.dtecinternational.com/drug-testing.
187
Duan L. X. Zheng Q. S. Tu T. (2022a). Instantaneous high-resolution visual imaging of latent fingerprints in water using color-tunable AIE pincer complexes. Adv. Mater.34 (35), e2202540. 10.1002/adma.202202540
188
Duan N. Chen X. W. Lin X. F. Ying D. C. Wang Z. P. Yuan W. B. et al (2023). Paper-based fluorometric sensing of malachite green using synergistic recognition of aptamer-molecularly imprinted polymers and luminescent metal-organic frameworks. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL384, 133665. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133665
189
Duan N. Qi S. Guo Y. Xu W. Wu S. Wang Z. (2020). Fe3O4@Au@Ag nanoparticles as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates for sensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride in pork with the use of aptamer binding. LWT, 134. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110017
190
Duan N. Ren K. X. Lyu C. Wang Z. P. Wu S. J. (2022b). Discovery and optimization of an aptamer and its sensing ability to amantadine based on SERS via binary metal nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food Chem.70 (46), 14805–14815. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06681
191
Dube S. Satish S. Rawtani D. (2023). Aptasensors in environmental forensics: tracking the silent killers. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.5 (4). 10.1002/wfs2.1482
192
Dutta B. Hazra A. Dey A. Sinha C. Ray P. P. Banerjee P. et al (2020). Construction of a succinate-bridged Cd(II)-Based two-dimensional coordination polymer for efficient optoelectronic device fabrication and explosive sensing application. Cryst. Growth Des.20 (2), 765–776. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01181
193
Düzmen S. Aslanoglu M. (2022). Tungsten doped neodymium oxide-carbon nanotubes based voltammetric platform as a highly efficient electrocatalyst and sensing material for monitoring albuterol. J. Electroanal. Chem.922, 116717. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116717
194
Dwivedi A. Anuradha S. M. Srivastava A. Kumar R. Srivastava S. K. (2023). Enhance photoluminescence properties of Ca-Eu:Y2O3@SiO2 core–shell nanomaterial for the advanced forensic and LEDs applications. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.299, 122782. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122782
195
El-Akaad S. De Saeger S. Beloglazova N. (2021). Molecularly imprinted polymer based capacitive sensing of a specific Leuckart marker 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine in wastewater. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL343, 130116. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130116
196
Elbalkiny H. T. Samir A. (2022). Green potentiometric electrode for determination of salbutamol in biological samples. Anal. Biochem.659, 114949. 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114949
197
Elbasuney S. Baraka A. El-Sharkawy Y. H. (2020a). Novel laser induced fluorescence with hyperspectral imaging of amplifying fluorescent melamine resin for TNT vapor detection. Opt. Laser Technol.132, 106488. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106488
198
Elbasuney S. El-Sharkawy Y. H. El-Sayyad G. S. Gobara M. (2020b). Surface modified colloidal silica nanoparticles: novel aspect for complete identification of explosive materials. Talanta211, 120695. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120695
199
Elgabry M. Nesbeth D. Johnson S. D. (2020). A systematic review of the criminogenic potential of synthetic biology and routes to future crime prevention. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.8, 571672. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.571672
200
Elmizadeh H. Bardajee G. R. Moaddeli A. (2023). Ultrasensitive and rapid detection of methamphetamine in forensic biological fluids using fluorescent apta-nanobiosensors based on CdTe quantum dots. Microchem. J.189, 108519. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108519
201
ENFSI (2021). Best practice manual for the investigation of fires and explosions. Available online at: www.enfsi.eu.
202
Environmentagency (2023). Waste criminals targeted on Environment Agency day of action – creating a better place. Available online at: https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2023/01/16/waste-criminals-targeted-on-environment-agency-day-of-action/.
203
Erturan A. M. Durmaz H. Gultekin S. S. (2023). Simultaneous detection of molecules with the surface-enhanced infrared absorption sensor platform based on disk antennas with double spacer. Spectrosc. Lett.56, 283–292. 10.1080/00387010.2023.2208650
204
Esmaelpourfarkhani M. Danesh N. M. Ramezani M. Alibolandi M. Abdolabadi A. K. Abnous K. et al (2023). Split aptamer-based fluorescent biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of cocaine using N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX as fluorophore. Microchem. J.190, 108630. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108630
205
Estevez A. Perez N. Casanova-Chafer J. Llobet E. Beriain A. (2022). RFID gas sensor for in-field detection of chemical threats: evaluation of batteryless discontinuous operation. IEEE Sensors, 1–4. 10.1109/sensors52175.2022.9967213
206
Evidential Drug Identification Testing (2023). Good practice guide-2023 handling instructions update history. London, United Kingdom: National Police Chiefs’ Council: Forensic Capability Network.
207
Fakayode S. O. Lisse C. Medawala W. Brady P. N. Bwambok D. K. Anum D. et al (2023). Fluorescent chemical sensors: applications in analytical, environmental, forensic, pharmaceutical, biological, and biomedical sample measurement, and clinical diagnosis. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.59, 1–89. 10.1080/05704928.2023.2177666
208
Fan B. Wang Y. C. Li Z. H. Xun D. J. Dong J. Zhao X. W. et al (2022). Si@Ag@PEI substrate-based SERS sensor for rapid detection of illegally adulterated sulfur dioxide in traditional Chinese medicine. Talanta238, 122988. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122988
209
Fan Z. A. Chen X. Kong R. R. Lu Y. Q. Ma R. L. Wu J. W. et al (2023). Strongly fluorescent conjugated polymer nanoparticles in aqueous colloidal solution for universal, efficient and effective development of sebaceous and blood fingerprints. J. Colloid Interface Sci.642, 658–668. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.173
210
Fang W. Zhang B. Han F. Y. Qin Z. N. Feng Y. Q. Hu J. M. et al (2020). On-site and quantitative detection of trace methamphetamine in urine/serum samples with a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active microcavity and rapid pretreatment device. Anal. Chem.92 (19), 13539–13549. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03041
211
Fang Y. L. Wang Z. Quan Q. Q. Li Z. D. Pan K. L. Lei Y. et al (2023). Developing an ultrasensitive immunochromatographic assay for authentication of an emergent fraud aminopyrine in herbal tea. Food Chem.406, 135065. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135065
212
Far B. F. Naimi-Jamal M. R. Jahanbakhshi M. Mohammed H. T. Altimari U. S. Ansari J. (2022). Poly(3-thienylboronic acid) coated magnetic nanoparticles as a magnetic solid-phase adsorbent for extraction of methamphetamine from urine samples. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol.44, 2723–2733. 10.1080/01932691.2022.2124169
213
Fedick P. W. Pu F. Morato N. M. Cooks R. G. (2020). Identification and confirmation of fentanyls on paper using portable surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.31 (3), 735–741. 10.1021/jasms.0c00004
214
Feng W. Liu X. J. Xue M. J. Song Q. H. (2023). Bifunctional fluorescent probes for the detection of mustard gas and phosgene. Anal. Chem.95, 1755–1763. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05178
215
Ferrari A. G. M. Crapnell R. D. Banks C. E. (2021). Electroanalytical overview: electrochemical sensing platforms for food and drink safety. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (8), 291. 10.3390/bios11080291
216
Ferrari A. G. M. Elbardisy H. M. Silva V. Belal T. S. Talaat W. Daabees H. G. et al (2020). The influence of lateral flake size in graphene/graphite paste electrodes: an electroanalytical investigation. Anal. METHODS12 (16), 2133–2142. 10.1039/d0ay00169d
217
Ferreira P. A. de Oliveira F. M. de Melo E. I. de Carvalho A. E. Lucca B. G. Ferreira V. S. et al (2021b). Multi sensor compatible 3D-printed electrochemical cell for voltammetric drug screening. Anal. Chim. Acta1169, 338568. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338568
218
Ferreira R. G. Paula R. B. A. Okuma A. A. Costa L. M. (2021a). Fingerprint development techniques: a review. Rev. VIRTUAL De. QUIMICA.13 (6), 1278–1302. 10.21577/1984-6835.20210083
219
Fingerprint Identification (2024). “Biometric authentication,”. Tokyo, Japan: NEC Corporation. Available online at: https://www.nec.com/en/global/solutions/biometrics/fingerprint/index.html.
220
Firmino E. da Silva Oliveira L. Borges Martins F. C. Filho J. C. S. Barbosa H. P. Andrade A. A. et al (2021). Eu3+-doped SiO2–Y2O3 containing Sr2+ for application as fingerprinting detector. Opt. Mater (Amst).114, 111018. 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111018
221
Food Allergen Testing (2025). Food safety neogen. Available online at: https://www.neogen.com/en-gb/categories/allergens/.
222
Food Safety News (2025). UK’s food crime unit reveals risks and progress on investigations. Chicago, IL: Food Safety News. Available online at: https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/12/uks-food-crime-unit-reveals-risks-and-progress-on-investigations/#google_vignette.
223
Food Standards Agency (2025a). “The cost of food crime phase 2 - results,”. London, United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency (FSA). Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/research/the-cost-of-food-crime-phase-2-results.
224
Food Standards Agency (2025b). “Food crime,”. London, United Kingdom: Food Standards Agency. Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/safety-hygiene/food-crime.
225
Food Standards Agency (2025c). Food standards agency. Available online at: https://www.food.gov.uk/.
226
Forbes T. P. Krauss S. T. Gillen G. (2020). Trace detection and chemical analysis of homemade fuel-oxidizer mixture explosives: emerging challenges and perspectives. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.131, 116023. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116023
227
Forensic Body Fluid Analysis Services (2024). Forensic access. Available online at: https://www.forensic-access.co.uk/forensic-services/biology/body-fluid-analysis/.
228
Forensics Library (2024). “Bodily fluids analysis,”. United Kingdom: The Forensics Library. Available online at: https://aboutforensics.co.uk/bodily-fluids-analysis/.
229
Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (2021). Advancing fire scene investigations with field portable technologies. Available online at: https://forensiccoe.org/advancing-fire-scene-investigations/.
230
Fouad R. Saif M. (2020). Synthesis, spectroscopic and photoluminescence studies of novel Eu3+ nanophosphor complex as fluorescent sensor for highly sensitive detection of latent fingerprints and anti-counterfeiting. J. Mol. Struct.1217, 128472. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128472
231
Fouda-Mbanga B. G. Pillay K. Tywabi-Ngeva Z. (2023). Novel development of zinc oxide-coated carbon nanoparticles from pineapple leaves using sol gel method for optimal adsorption of Cu2+ and reuse in latent fingerprint application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.31, 38801–38820. 10.1007/s11356-023-25474-y
232
Fouda-Mbanga B. G. Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2022). Cd2+ ion adsorption and re-use of spent adsorbent with N-doped carbon nanoparticles coated on cerium oxide nanorods nanocomposite for fingerprint detection. Chem. Phys. IMPACT5, 100083. 10.1016/j.chphi.2022.100083
233
Fularz A. Almohammed S. Rice J. H. (2021). SERS enhancement of porphyrin-type molecules on metal-free cellulose-based substrates. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.9 (49), 16808–16819. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06685
234
Fulgencio A. C. C. Resende G. A. P. Teixeira M. C. F. Botelho B. G. Sena M. M. (2022). Screening method for the rapid detection of diethylene glycol in beer based on chemometrics and portable near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem.391, 133258. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133258
235
Galan-Malo P. Pellicer S. Pérez M. D. Sánchez L. Razquin P. Mata L. (2019). Development of a novel duplex lateral flow test for simultaneous detection of casein and β-lactoglobulin in food. Food Chem.293, 41–48. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.039
236
Ganesan M. Nagaraaj P. (2020). Quantum dots as nanosensors for detection of toxics: a literature review. Anal. METHODS12 (35), 4254–4275. 10.1039/d0ay01293a
237
Gao R. Li D. Zhang Q. Zheng S. Ren X. Deng W. (2021). GNPs-QDs core–satellites assembly: trimodal platform for on-site identification and detection of TNT in complex media. Sens. Actuators B Chem.328, 128960. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128960
238
Gao R. Song X. Zhan C. Weng C. Cheng S. Guo K. et al (2020). Light trapping induced flexible wrinkled nanocone SERS substrate for highly sensitive explosive detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem.314, 128081. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128081
239
Garcia-Cruz A. Ahmad O. S. Alanazi K. Piletska E. Piletsky S. A. (2020). Generic sensor platform based on electro-responsive molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles (e-NanoMIPs). Microsystems and Nanoeng.6 (1), 83–89. 10.1038/s41378-020-00193-3
240
Garima I. Sachdev A. Matai I. (2022a). An electrochemical sensor based on cobalt oxyhydroxide nanoflakes/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for detection of illicit drug-clonazepam. J. Electroanal. Chem.919, 116537. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116537
241
Garima P. V. Mehta S. K. Sharma S. (2022b). Selective response studies of graphene materials with forensic relevant drugs through fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Anal. Chem.77 (4), 495–504. 10.1134/s1061934822040062
242
Garrido E. Alfonso M. de Greñu B. D. Lozano-Torres B. Parra M. Gaviña P. et al (2020). Nanosensor for sensitive detection of the new psychedelic drug 25I-NBOMe. CHEMISTRY-A Eur. J.26 (13), 2813–2816. 10.1002/chem.201905688
243
Garrido E. Hernández-Sigüenza G. Climent E. Marcos M. D. Rurack K. Gaviña P. et al (2023). Strip-based lateral flow-type indicator displacement assay for γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) detection in beverages. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL377, 133043. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.133043
244
Gasser A. Shcheglov A. Lapauw T. Dries T. V. den Ingelberts H. Hoving W. et al (2022). Miniaturized time-resolved fluorescence spectrometer system, 12008. Bellingham, WA: SPIE (The International Society for Optics and Photonics), 23. 10.1117/12.2609535
245
Gaudin V. (2021). Contribution of nanomaterials to the development of electrochemical aptasensors for the detection of antimicrobial residues in food products. CHEMOSENSORS9 (4), 69. 10.3390/chemosensors9040069
246
Gautam R. Chaturvedi D. Sil S. Kuhar N. Singh S. Umapathy S. (2022). Characterization of aggregating agents towards sensitive optical detection of tryptophan using lab-on-a-chip. Photonics9 (9), 648. 10.3390/photonics9090648
247
Ge W. Suryoprabowo S. Kuang H. Liu L. Song S. (2020). Rapid detection of triazophos in cucumber using lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 1051–1060. 10.1080/0954010520201816919
248
Geballa-Koukoula A. Ross G. M. S. Bosman A. J. Zhao Y. Zhou H. Nielen M. W. F. et al (2023). Best practices and current implementation of emerging smartphone-based (bio)sensors-Part 2: development, validation, and social impact. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.161, 116986. 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116986
249
Geng L. J. Liu M. Y. Huang J. C. Li F. L. Zhang Y. Y. Guo Y. M. et al (2023). Novel dual-signal SiO2-COOH@MIPs electrochemical sensor for highly sensitive detection of chloramphenicol in milk. SENSORS23 (3), 1346. 10.3390/s23031346
250
Geng P. F. Sun S. J. Wang X. M. Ma L. Guo C. Li J. T. et al (2022). Rapid and sensitive detection of amphetamine by SERS-based competitive immunoassay coupled with magnetic separation. Anal. METHODS14 (26), 2608–2615. 10.1039/d2ay00581f
251
Geng Z. Zhang X. Fan Z. Lv X. Su Y. Chen H. (2017). Recent progress in optical biosensors based on smartphone platforms. Sensors17 (11), 2449. 10.3390/s17112449
252
Ghorbanizamani F. Moulahoum H. Celik E. G. Timur S. (2022). Ionic liquid-hydrogel hybrid material for enhanced electron transfer and sensitivity towards electrochemical detection of methamphetamine. J. Mol. Liq.361, 119627. 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119627
253
Ghubish Z. El-Kemary M. (2022). Influence of Li+ doping on the luminescence performance of green nano-phosphor CaWO4:Tb3+ as a sweat pores fingerprint and cheiloscopy sensor. J. INDUSTRIAL Eng. Chem.107, 61–74. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.11.026
254
Ghubish Z. Saif M. Hafez H. Mahmoud H. Kamal R. El-Kemary M. (2020). Novel red photoluminescence sensor based on Europium ion doped calcium hydroxy stannate CaSn(OH)6:Eu+3 for latent fingerprint detection. J. Mol. Struct.1207, 127840. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127840
255
Gill A. Hickey B. Zhong W. Hooley R. (2020). Selective sensing of THC and related metabolites in biofluids by host:guest arrays. ChemComm R. Soc. Chem.56, 4352–4355. 10.1039/d0cc01489c
256
Girmatsion M. Mahmud A. Abraha B. Xie Y. F. Cheng Y. L. Yu H. et al (2021). Rapid detection of antibiotic residues in animal products using surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: a review. Food control.126, 108019. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108019
257
Glasscott M. W. Vannoy K. J. Fernando P. Kosgei G. K. Moores L. C. Dick J. E. (2020). Electrochemical sensors for the detection of fentanyl and its analogs: foundations and recent advances. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.132, 116037. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116037
258
Goel R. Awasthi V. Bhardwaj V. Dubey S. K. (2022). “Flexible and cost-effective substrate for detection of analytes using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS),” in Proc. SPIE 12131, nanophotonics IX, 103.
259
Gonzalez M. Gorziza R. P. Mariotti K. D. Limberger R. P. (2020). Methodologies applied to fingerprint analysis. J. Forensic Sci.65 (4), 1040–1048. 10.1111/1556-4029.14313
260
González-Hernández J. Moya-Alvarado G. Alvarado-Gámez A. L. Urcuyo R. Barquero-Quirós M. Arcos-Martínez M. J. (2022b). Electrochemical biosensor for quantitative determination of fentanyl based on immobilized cytochrome c on multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified screen-printed carbon electrodes. Microchim. ACTA189 (12), 483. 10.1007/s00604-022-05578-x
261
González-Hernández J. Ott C. E. Arcos-Martínez M. J. Colina A. Heras A. Alvarado-Gámez A. L. et al (2022a). Rapid determination of the “legal highs” 4-MMC and 4-MEC by spectroelectrochemistry: simultaneous cyclic voltammetry and in situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. SENSORS22 (1). 10.3390/s22010295
262
Gooch J. Daniel B. Frascione N. (2014). Application of fluorescent substrates to the in situ detection of prostate specific antigen. Talanta125, 210–214. 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.02.021
263
Gove R. J. (2014). “Complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors for mobile devices,” in High performance silicon imaging. Editor DuriniD. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing (an imprint of Elsevier)), 191–234.
264
Gozdzialski L. Wallace B. Hore D. (2023). Point-of-care community drug checking technologies: an insider look at the scientific principles and practical considerations. Harm Reduct. J.20 (1), 39. 10.1186/s12954-023-00764-3
265
Gross J. H. (2017). “Mass spectrometry: a textbook,”. 3rd ed. Springer.
266
Grothe R. A. Lobato A. Mounssef B. Tasić N. Braga A. A. C. Maldaner A. O. et al (2021). Electroanalytical profiling of cocaine samples by means of an electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymer using benzocaine as the template molecule. Analyst.146 (5), 1747–1759. 10.1039/d0an02274h
267
Guan T. Jiang Z. Liang Z. Q. Liu Y. J. Huang W. J. Li X. M. et al (2022). Single-emission dual-enzyme magnetosensor for multiplex immunofluorometric assay of adulterated colorants in chili seasoning. Food Chem.366, 130594. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130594
268
Guidance (2014). How we respond to marine pollution incidents - GOV. Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Marine Management Organisation (MMO). Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-we-respond-to-marine-pollution-incidents.
269
Guleria A. Chavan A. P. Neogy S. Gandhi V. V. Kunwar A. Debnath A. K. et al (2020). Glutathione-Functionalized organosilicon oxide nanoparticles for bioimaging and forensics. ACS Appl. Nano Mater3 (6), 5123–5138. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00420
270
Guo G. X. Wang T. Ding X. Wang H. T. Wu Q. L. Zhang Z. W. et al (2022a). Fluorescent lanthanide metal-organic framework for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of methcathinone in human urine. Talanta249, 123663. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123663
271
Guo J. X. Liu Y. Ju H. X. Lu G. M. (2022b). From lab to field: surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sensing strategies for on-site analysis. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.146, 116488. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116488
272
Guo L. Wang Z. Xu X. Xu L. Kuang H. Xiao J. et al (2020). Europium nanosphere-based fluorescence strip sensor for ultrasensitive and quantitative determination of fumonisin B1. Anal. Methods12 (43), 5229–5235. 10.1039/d0ay01734e
273
Guo Y. Pan X. Cheng Y. Yu H. Xie Y. Yang F. et al (2021). Orientational screening of ssDNA-templated silver nanoclusters and application for bleomycin assay. Colloid Polym. Sci.299 (10), 1643–1649. 10.1007/s00396-021-04890-x
274
Guria U. N. Maiti K. Ali S. S. Gangopadhyay A. Samanta S. K. Roy K. et al (2020). An organic nanofibrous polymeric composite for ratiometric detection of diethyl chlorophosphate (DCP) in solution and vapor. ChemistrySelect5 (13), 3770–3777. 10.1002/slct.202000179
275
Gurusamy L. Karuppasamy L. Anandan S. Liu C. H. Wu J. (2022). Perovskite nanocomposite of defective yolk-shell BaHo2Co3O8-xfor electrochemical sensing of ractopamine in pork meat sample. Mater Today Chem.25, 100965. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.100965
276
Gusenbauer M. Haddaway N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods11 (2), 181–217. 10.1002/jrsm.1378
277
Ha S. Kim J. Lee S. Yoo D. Bae J. Kim W. K. et al (2022). In situ, real-time, colorimetric detection of γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) using self-protection products coated with chemical receptor-embedded hydrogel. Biosens. Bioelectron.207, 114195. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114195
278
Haghighi M. Shahlaei M. Irandoust M. Hassanpour A. (2020). New and sensitive sensor for voltammetry determination of Methamphetamine in biological samples. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.31 (14), 10989–11000. 10.1007/s10854-020-03647-6
279
Hakeem M. K. Shah A. Nisar J. Iftikhar F. J. Khan S. B. Shah I. (2022). Electrochemical sensing platform for the detection and degradation studies of metanil yellow. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (5), 056503. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6981
280
Han Q. Liang Y. Li Z. H. Song Y. L. Wang Y. X. Zhang X. R. (2022). Tunable multicolor emission based on dual-mode luminescence Y2O3: Eu@SiO2/Y2O3: Er(Tm/Yb) composite nanomaterials. J. Lumin241, 118541. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118541
281
Han S. Sun R. N. Zhao L. Yan C. Chu H. T. (2023). Molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor based on synergistic interaction of honeycomb-like Ni-MOF decorated with AgNPs and N-GQDs for ultra-sensitive detection of olaquindox in animal-origin food. Food Chem.418, 136001. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136001
282
Han S. Zhang C. Lin S. Sha X. Hasi W. (2021). Sensitive and reliable identification of fentanyl citrate in urine and serum using chloride ion-treated paper-based SERS substrate. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.251, 119463. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119463
283
Han S. Zhang C. Sha X. Y. Li N. Hasi W. Zhang Y. H. (2020). Effective SERS method for identification of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in biological samples. Anal. METHODS12 (12), 1662–1669. 10.1039/d0ay00019a
284
Hang Y. J. Boryczka J. Wu N. Q. (2022). Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: a review. Chem. Soc. Rev.51 (1), 329–375. 10.1039/c9cs00621d
285
Hao H. M. Ye Z. J. Dai H. Liu C. Yi A. H. Xu B. J. et al (2021). Pyrenyl-based aggregation-induced emission luminogen for highly sensitive and selective detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in water. ChemistrySelect6 (43), 12182–12187. 10.1002/slct.202103098
286
Harathi J. Thenmozhi K. (2022). Water-soluble ionic liquid as a fluorescent probe towards distinct binding and detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol in aqueous medium. Chemosphere286, 131825. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131825
287
Harbison S. Fleming R. (2016). Forensic body fluid identification: state of the art. Res. Rep. Forensic Med. Sci.6, 11–23. 10.2147/rrfms.s57994
288
Hardy M. Kelleher L. Gomes P. D. Buchan E. Chu H. O. M. Oppenheimer P. G. (2022). Methods in Raman spectroscopy for saliva studies - a review. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.57 (3), 177–233. 10.1080/05704928.2021.1969944
289
Harish V. Tewari D. Gaur M. Yadav A. B. Swaroop S. Bechelany M. et al (2022). Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, antimicrobial, and agro-food applications. Nanomaterials12 (3), 457. 10.3390/nano12030457
290
Harsha K. G. Appalanaidu E. Rao B. A. Baggi T. R. Rao V. J. (2020). ON–OFF fluorescent imidazole derivative for sensitive and selective detection of copper(II) ions. Russ. J. Org. Chem.56 (1), 158–168. 10.1134/s1070428020010248
291
Harshey A. Srivastava A. Das T. Nigam K. Shrivastava R. Yadav V. K. (2021). Trends in gunshot residue detection by electrochemical methods for forensic purpose. J. Analysis Test.5 (3), 258–269. 10.1007/s41664-020-00152-x
292
He D. Wu Z. Cui B. Xu E. Jin Z. (2019). Establishment of a dual mode immunochromatographic assay for Campylobacter jejuni detection. Food Chem.289, 708–713. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.106
293
He F. Yang J. Y. Zou T. T. Xu Z. L. Tian Y. X. Sun W. J. et al (2021). A gold nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for simultaneous detection of multiplex sildenafil adulterants in health food by only one antibody. Anal. Chim. Acta1141, 1–12. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.10.032
294
He X. Liu Y. Liu Y. Cui S. Liu W. Li Z. (2020a). Controllable fabrication of Ag-NP-decorated porous ZnO nanosheet arrays with superhydrophobic properties for high performance SERS detection of explosives. CrystEngComm.22 (4), 776–785. 10.1039/c9ce01430f
295
He X. C. Yang S. J. Xu T. L. Song Y. C. Zhang X. J. (2020b). Microdroplet-captured tapes for rapid sampling and SERS detection of food contaminants. Biosens. Bioelectron.152, 112013. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112013
296
Higgins S. Kurouski D. (2023). Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy enables highly accurate identification of different brands, types and colors of hair dyes. Talanta251, 123762. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123762
297
Hitabatuma A. Wang P. L. Su X. O. Ma M. M. (2022). Metal-organic frameworks-based sensors for food safety. FOODS11 (3), 382. 10.3390/foods11030382
298
Holliday K. (2016). Luminescence spectroscopy, inorganic condensed matter applications. Encycl. Spectrosc. Spectrom., 627–635. 10.1016/b978-0-12-803224-4.00174-6
299
Honeychurch K. C. (2019). Review of electroanalytical-based approaches for the determination of benzodiazepines. Biosensors9 (4), 130. 10.3390/bios9040130
300
Hong Y. Li M. L. Wang Z. H. Xu B. Y. Zhang Y. T. Wang S. X. et al (2022). Engineered optoplasmonic core-satellite microspheres for SERS determination of methamphetamine derivative and its precursors. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL358, 131437. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131437
301
Hu A. Q. Chen G. Q. Yang T. Q. Ma C. Q. Li L. Gao H. et al (2022a). A fluorescent probe based on FRET effect between carbon nanodots and gold nanoparticles for sensitive detection of thiourea. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.281, 121582. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121582
302
Hu J. X. Chen C. Xie X. B. Zhang L. C. Song H. J. Lv Y. (2023). Instant fingerprint discrimination for military explosive vapors by Dy3+Doping a La2O3-based cataluminescence sensor system. Anal. Chem.95, 3516–3524. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05678
303
Hu M. Han Q. Y. Xing B. G. (2020b). Metallic nanoparticle-enabled sensing of a drug-of-abuse: an attempt at forensic application. CHEMBIOCHEM21 (17), 2512–2517. 10.1002/cbic.202000157
304
Hu P. Sun Z. T. Shen Y. W. Pan Y. W. (2021). A long-term stable sensor based on Fe@PCN-224 for rapid and quantitative detection of H2O2 in fishery products. FOODS10 (2), 419. 10.3390/foods10020419
305
Hu R. Yan Y. B. Jiang L. Huang C. X. Shen X. T. (2022b). Determination of total cathinones with a single molecularly imprinted fluorescent sensor assisted by electromembrane microextraction. Microchim. ACTA189 (9), 324. 10.1007/s00604-022-05405-3
306
Hu S. J. Cao Z. Y. Zhou L. Ma R. L. Su B. (2020a). Electrochemiluminescence imaging of latent fingerprints by electropolymerized luminol. J. Electroanal. Chem.870, 114238. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114238
307
Hua Z. Yu T. Liu D. H. Xianyu Y. L. (2021). Recent advances in gold nanoparticles-based biosensors for food safety detection. Biosens. Bioelectron.179, 113076. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113076
308
Huang C. Wang J. Y. Lin J. R. L. Huang W. He Y. (2022a). Improved colorimetric detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene through γ-cyclodextrin complexation. FORENSIC Chem.30, 100444. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100444
309
Huang C. L. Jiang S. P. Kou F. X. Guo M. T. Li S. Yu G. J. et al (2022c). Development of jellyfish-like ZnO@Ag substrate for sensitive SERS detection of melamine in milk. Appl. Surf. Sci.600, 154153. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154153
310
Huang W. Fan D. S. Li W. F. Meng Y. Y. Liu T. C. Y. (2022b). Rapid evaluation of milk acidity and identification of milk adulteration by Raman spectroscopy combined with chemometrics analysis. Vib. Spectrosc.123, 103440. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2022.103440
311
Huang X. Huang X. Xie J. Li X. Huang Z. (2020). Rapid simultaneous detection of fumonisin B1 and deoxynivalenol in grain by immunochromatographic test strip. Anal. Biochem.606, 113878. 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113878
312
Hue-Roye K. Vege S. (2008). Principles of PCR-based assays. Immunohematology24 (2), 170–175. 10.21307/immunohematology-2019-294
313
Hung K. Moon R. Roese E. Tripathi A. Emmons E. Wilcox P. et al (2022). “Enabling detection technologies for explosive threats,” in Proc. SPIE 12116, chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) sensing XXIII, 12116, 12–21.
314
Hygiena (2025). ATP hygiene monitoring by hygiena. Available online at: https://www.completesafetysupplies.co.uk/hygiene-monitoring-c19/atp-hygiene-monitoring-c7/hygiena-m15.
315
IDEMIA (2025). “Tenprint scanners for live scan fingerprint,”. Courbevoie, France: IDEMIA. Available online at: https://www.idemia.com/tenprint-scanners.
316
Ilhan H. Tayyarcan E. K. Caglayan M. G. Boyaci İ. H. Saglam N. Tamer U. (2021). Replacement of antibodies with bacteriophages in lateral flow assay of Salmonella Enteritidis. Biosens. Bioelectron.189, 113383. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113383
317
Illston-Baggs G. Deacon P. Ivanova J. Nichols-Drew L. Farrugia K. J. (2021). A pseudo-operational trial: an investigation into the use of longwave reflected UV imaging of cyanoacrylate developed fingermarks. Forensic Sci. Int.325, 110871. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110871
318
Izham N. Z. M. Yusoff H. M. Asari A. B. Bhat I. U. H. (2022). Potential recognition layer in electrochemical sensor: a comparative characterization of p-cyano schiff base compounds. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem.12 (2), 1803–1813. 10.33263/BRIAC122.18031813
319
Jalili R. Khataee A. (2020). Application of molecularly imprinted polymers and dual-emission carbon dots hybrid for ratiometric determination of chloramphenicol in milk. FOOD Chem. Toxicol.146, 111806. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111806
320
Jamieson O. Mecozzi F. Crapnell R. D. Battell W. Hudson A. Novakovic K. et al (2021). Approaches to the rational design of molecularly imprinted polymers developed for the selective extraction or detection of antibiotics in environmental and food samples. Phys. STATUS SOLIDI A-APPLICATIONS Mater. Sci.218 (13). 10.1002/pssa.202100021
321
Jang S. Son S. U. Kang B. Kim J. Lim J. Seo S. et al (2022). Electrospun nanofibrous membrane-based colorimetric device for rapid and simple screening of amphetamine-type stimulants in drinks. Anal. Chem.94 (8), 3535–3542. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04512
322
Jenie S. N. A. Krismastuti F. S. H. Ningrum Y. P. Kristiani A. Yuniati M. D. Astuti W. et al (2020). Geothermal silica-based fluorescent nanoparticles for the visualization of latent fingerprints. Mater. EXPRESS10 (2), 258–266. 10.1166/mex.2020.1551
323
Jeong H. J. Dong J. Yeom C. H. Ueda H. (2020). Synthesis of quenchbodies for one-pot detection of stimulant drug methamphetamine. Methods Protoc.3 (2), 43. 10.3390/mps3020043
324
Jiang Q. Y. Li D. Liu Y. H. Mao Z. S. Yu Y. J. Zhu P. et al (2021a). Recyclable and green AuBPs@MoS2@tinfoil box for high throughput SERS tracking of diquat in complex compounds. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL344, 130290. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130290
325
Jiang X. Wu F. S. Huang X. Y. He S. Han Q. Y. Zhang Z. H. et al (2023). Fabrication of a molecularly-imprinted-polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposite for electrochemical sensing of new psychoactive substances. NANOMATERIALS13 (4), 751. 10.3390/nano13040751
326
Jiang Y. X. Cong S. Song G. Sun H. Z. Zhang W. Yao W. R. et al (2021b). Defective cuprous oxide as a selective surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor of dye adulteration in Chinese herbal medicines. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.52 (7), 1265–1274. 10.1002/jrs.6127
327
Jin Z. Zheng W. W. Liu Y. M. Xu Z. Zhao Y. (2023). Facile preparation of electroactive Au@Ru cups for sensitive detection of bisphenol A. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.11 (20), 7673–7682. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07570
328
Jindal G. Kaur N. (2023). Barbituric acid appended fluorescent sensor for the detection of Cu2+/Hg2+ions along with real-life utility in recognition of malathionin food samples and fingerprint imaging. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY.434, 114238. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114238
329
Jing M. Y. Zhang H. Li M. Mao Z. Shi X. M. (2021). Silver nanoparticle-decorated TiO2 nanotube array for solid-phase microextraction and SERS detection of antibiotic residue in milk. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.255, 119652. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119652
330
Joao A. F. Rocha R. G. Matias T. A. Richter E. M. Petruci J. F. S. Muñoz R. A. A. (2021). 3D-printing in forensic electrochemistry: atropine determination in beverages using an additively manufactured graphene-polylactic acid electrode. Microchem. J.167, 106324. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106324
331
Joosten F. Parrilla M. van Nuijs A. L. N. Ozoemena K. I. De Wael K. (2022). Electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in oral fluid: potential for forensic drug testing. Electrochim Acta436, 141309. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141309
332
Jornet-Martinez N. Campins-Falco P. Herraez-Hernandez R. (2021). A colorimetric membrane-based sensor with improved selectivity towards amphetamine. MOLECULES26 (21), 6713. 10.3390/molecules26216713
333
Junaid H. M. Waseem M. T. Khan Z. A. Gul H. Yu C. Shaikh A. J. et al (2022). Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for selective detection of TNT and TNP explosives in aqueous medium through fluorescence emission enhancement mechanism. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY428, 113865. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113865
334
Justino C. I. L. Duarte A. C. Rocha-Santos T. A. P. (2017). Recent progress in biosensors for environmental monitoring: a review. Sensors17 (12), 2918. 10.3390/s17122918
335
Kabel K. I. Labena A. Gado W. S. (2021). Novel, low cost and fast detection sensor for biogenic H2S gas based on polyaniline/ZnO, CdO and CeO2 nanocomposites at room temperature. Egypt J. Chem.64 (6), 0–104. 10.21608/ejchem.2021.60970.3308
336
Kadhim M. M. Abdullaha S. A. Taban T. Z. Alomar T. Almasoud N. Hachim S. K. (2023). Strong reactivity and electronic sensitivity of Au-decorated BC3 nanotubes toward the phenylpropanolamine drug. Appl. Phys. A-MATERIALS Sci. and Process.129 (3), 232. 10.1007/s00339-023-06431-5
337
Kadu R. D. Keri R. S. Nagaraju D. H. Budagumpi S. (2023). State-of-the-art electrochemical sensors for quantitative detection of pesticides. Appl. Organomet. Chem.37. 10.1002/aoc.7097
338
Kaewnu K. Promsuwan K. Phonchai A. Thiangchanya A. Somapa D. Somapa N. et al (2021). Cost-effective foam-based colorimetric sensor for roadside testing of alcohol in undiluted saliva. CHEMOSENSORS9 (12), 334. 10.3390/chemosensors9120334
339
Kajale S. N. Yadav S. Cai Y. B. Joy B. Sarkar D. (2021). 2D material based field effect transistors and nanoelectromechanical systems for sensing applications. iScience24 (12), 103513. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103513
340
Kamal R. Saif M. (2020). Barium tungstate doped with terbium ion green nanophosphor: low temperature preparation, characterization and potential applications. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.229, 117928. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117928
341
Kamel S. Khattab T. A. (2020). Recent advances in cellulose-based biosensors for medical diagnosis. Biosens. (Basel).10 (6), 67. 10.3390/bios10060067
342
Kang D. Jeon E. Kim S. Lee J. (2020b). Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanomaterials: recent advances and applications. BioChip J.14 (1), 124–135. 10.1007/s13206-020-4111-9
343
Kang J. H. Kim Y. T. Lee K. Kim H. M. Lee K. G. Ahn J. et al (2020a). An electrophoretic DNA extraction device using a nanofilter for molecular diagnosis of pathogens. Nanoscale12 (8), 5048–5054. 10.1039/c9nr10675h
344
Kanodarwala F. K. Leśniewski A. Olszowska-Łoś I. Spindler X. Pieta I. S. Lennard C. et al (2021). Fingermark detection using upconverting nanoparticles and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming. Forensic Sci. Int.326, 110915. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110915
345
Karadurmus L. Bilge S. Sinag A. Ozkan S. A. (2022). Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-Based sensing for detection of explosives: current perspectives and future applications. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.155, 116694. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116694
346
Karimi-Maleh H. Karimi F. Alizadeh M. Sanati A. L. (2020). Electrochemical sensors, a bright future in the fabrication of portable kits in analytical systems. Chem. Rec.20 (7), 682–692. 10.1002/tcr.201900092
347
Karuppaiah B. Jeyaraman A. Chen S. M. Chavan P. R. Karthik R. Shim J. J. et al (2023). Design and synthesis of nickel-doped cobalt molybdate microrods: an effective electrocatalyst for the determination of antibiotic drug ronidazole. Environ. Res.222, 115343. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115343
348
Kasry A. Nicol A. Knoll W. (2021). Grating-coupled surface-plasmon fluorescence DNA sensor. Appl. Phys. B127 (5), 68–12. 10.1007/s00340-021-07619-4
349
Kathiravan A. Gowri A. Srinivasan V. Smith T. A. Ashokkumar M. Jhonsi M. A. (2020). A simple and ubiquitous device for picric acid detection in latent fingerprints using carbon dots. ANALYST.145 (13), 4532–4539. 10.1039/d0an00750a
350
Kazakevich Y. V. Lobrutto R. (2007). HPLC for pharmaceutical scientists. John Wiley and Sons.
351
Ke X. Fan Y. Zhou J. Huang Z. (2020). A novel coumarin-derived dithioacetal chemosensor for trace detection of Hg2+ in real water samples. J. Chem. Res.44 (3–4), 142–147. 10.1177/1747519819890561
352
Khajouei S. Ravan H. Ebrahimi A. (2020). Developing a colorimetric nucleic acid-responsive DNA hydrogel using DNA proximity circuit and catalytic hairpin assembly. Anal. Chim. Acta.1137, 1–10. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.08.059
353
Khan S. Hazra A. Dutta B. Akhtaruzzaman Md. Raihan M. J. Banerjee P. et al (2021). Strategic design of anthracene-decorated highly luminescent coordination polymers for selective and rapid detection of TNP: an explosive nitro derivative and mutagenic pollutant. Cryst. Growth Des.21 (6), 3344–3354. 10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00145
354
Khayal A. Dawane V. Amin M. A. Tirth V. Yadav V. K. Algahtani A. et al (2021). Advances in the methods for the synthesis of carbon dots and their emerging applications. Polym. (Basel)13 (18), 3190. 10.3390/polym13183190
355
Khinevich N. Bandarenka H. Zavatski S. Girel K. Tamuleviciene A. Tamulevicius T. et al (2021). Porous silicon-A versatile platform for mass-production of ultrasensitive SERS-active substrates. MICROPOROUS MESOPOROUS Mater.323, 111204. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111204
356
Khorablou Z. Shahdost-Fard F. Razmi H. (2022). Voltammetric determination of pethidine in biofluids at a carbon cloth electrode modified by carbon selenide nanofilm. Talanta239, 123131. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123131
357
Khorablou Z. Shahdost-fard F. Razmi H. Yola M. L. Karimi-Maleh H. (2021). Recent advances in developing optical and electrochemical sensors for analysis of methamphetamine: a review. Chemosphere278, 130393. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130393
358
Khunoana S. Parani S. Oluwafemi O. S. Ndinteh D. T. Pillay K. (2020). Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Crinum macowanii bulb extracts and the application of these materials in blood detections at crime scenes. LUMINESCENCE35 (2), 187–195. 10.1002/bio.3710
359
Kim G. Lee J. Jeong S. Kim M. (2022). Development of a CsI(Tl) scintillator based gamma probe for the identification of nuclear materials in unknown areas. J. Instrum.17 (03), P03005. 10.1088/1748-0221/17/03/p03005
360
Kim J. (2017). “Multifunctional smart biopolymer composites as actuators,” in Biopolymer composites in electronics (Elsevier Inc.), 311–331.
361
Kim J. Park H. Kim J. Seo B. Kim J. H. (2020). SAW chemical array device coated with polymeric sensing materials for the detection of nerve agents. Sensors20 (24), 7028. 10.3390/s20247028
362
Kim T. H. (2021). Toward emerging innovations in electrochemical biosensing technology. Appl. Sci.11 (6), 2461. 10.3390/app11062461
363
King A. Singh R. Anand R. Behera S. K. Nayak B. B. (2021). Phase and luminescence behaviour of Ce-doped zirconia nanopowders for latent fingerprint visualisation. Opt. (Stuttg)242, 167087. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167087
364
Kishbaugh J. M. Cielski S. Fotusky A. Lighthart S. Maguire K. Quarino L. et al (2019). Detection of prostate specific antigen and salivary amylase in vaginal swabs using SERATEC® immunochromatographic assays. Forensic Sci. Int.304, 109899. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109899
365
Klimuntowski M. Alam M. M. Singh G. Howlader M. M. R. (2020). Electrochemical sensing of cannabinoids in biofluids: a noninvasive tool for drug detection. ACS Sens.5 (3), 620–636. 10.1021/acssensors.9b02390
366
Kolacz A. M. Wisnik-Sawka M. Maziejuk M. Natora M. Harmata W. Rytel P. et al (2023). Air pollution and radiation monitoring in collective protection facilities. SENSORS23 (2), 706. 10.3390/s23020706
367
Kongkaew S. Tubtimtong S. Thavarungkul P. Kanatharana P. Chang K. H. Abdullah A. F. L. et al (2022). A fabrication of multichannel graphite electrode using low-cost stencil-printing technique. Sensors22 (8), 3034. 10.3390/s22083034
368
Köse K. Kehribar D. Y. Uzun L. (2021). Molecularly imprinted polymers in toxicology: a literature survey for the last 5 years. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (27), 35437–35471. 10.1007/s11356-021-14510-4
369
Koshy K. Fowler A. J. Gundogan B. Agha R. A. (2018). Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?Int. J. Surg. Oncol. (N Y)3 (2), 56. 10.1097/ij9.0000000000000056
370
Kranenburg R. F. Ou F. Sevo P. Petruzzella M. de Ridder R. van Klinken A. et al (2022b). On-site illicit-drug detection with an integrated near-infrared spectral sensor: a proof of concept. Talanta245, 123441. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123441
371
Kranenburg R. F. Ramaker H. J. van Asten A. C. (2022a). Portable near infrared spectroscopy for the isomeric differentiation of new psychoactive substances. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)341, 111467. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111467
372
Kranenburg R. F. Ramaker H. J. Weesepoel Y. Arisz P. W. F. Keizers P. H. J. van Esch A. et al (2023). The influence of water of crystallization in NIR-based MDMA•HCl detection. FORENSIC Chem.32, 100464. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100464
373
Kranenburg R. F. Weesepoel Y. Alewijn M. Sap S. Arisz P. W. F. van Esch A. et al (2022c). The importance of wavelength selection in on-scene identification of drugs of abuse with portable near-infrared spectroscopy. FORENSIC Chem.30, 100437. 10.1016/j.forc.2022.100437
374
Krishna S. Ahuja P. (2023). A chronological study of gunshot residue (GSR) detection techniques: a narrative review. Egypt J. Forensic Sci.13 (1), 51–21. 10.1186/s41935-023-00369-8
375
Kulkarni M. B. Ayachit N. H. Aminabhavi T. M. (2022). Biosensors and microfluidic biosensors: from fabrication to application. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (7), 543. 10.3390/bios12070543
376
Kumar B. R. Jyothi V. Suresh V. Srikanth S. S. S. (2020a). Microcantilever sensor design - explosive detection through volatile organic compounds in humidity conditions. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun.13 (2), 80–84. 10.1293/bio.13.80
377
Kumar N. Udayabhanu M. K. M. Nagaraju G. (2020c). Development and detection of level II and III features of latent fingerprints using highly sensitive AIE based coumarin fluorescent derivative. J. SCIENCE-ADVANCED Mater. DEVICES5 (4), 520–526. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.09.004
378
Kumar S. Singh P. (2023). Visualization and dermatoglyphics of latent fingerprints (sweat pores): security ink for anticounterfeiting labels and case studies. J. Photochem Photobiol. A Chem.437, 114418. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114418
379
Kumar V. (2021a). Chromo-fluorogenic sensors for chemical warfare agents in real-time analysis: journey towards accurate detection and differentiation. Chem. Commun.57 (28), 3430–3444. 10.1039/d1cc00132a
380
Kumar V. (2021b). Design and development of a prototype for specific naked-eye detection of blister and nerve agents. Anal. METHODS13 (19), 2248–2255. 10.1039/d1ay00449b
381
Kumar V. Saini S. K. Choudhury N. Kumar A. Maiti B. De P. et al (2021). Highly sensitive detection of nitro compounds using a fluorescent copolymer-based FRET system. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater3 (8), 4017–4026. 10.1021/acsapm.1c00540
382
Kumar V. Vaid K. Bansal S. A. Kim K. H. (2020b). Nanomaterial-based immunosensors for ultrasensitive detection of pesticides/herbicides: current status and perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron.165, 112382. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112382
383
Kushwaha C. S. Singh P. Shukla S. K. Chehimi M. M. (2022). Advances in conducting polymer nanocomposite based chemical sensors: an overview. Mater. Sci. Eng. B-ADVANCED Funct. SOLID-STATE Mater.284, 115856. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115856
384
Kvachakhia L. L. Shormanov V. K. Banchukova E. A. (2020). Forensic chemical study of Amlodipine. Sud. Med. Ekspert.63 (6), 39–44. 10.17116/sudmed20206306139
385
Kweitsu E. Armoo S. Kan-Dapaah K. Abavare E. Dodoo-Arhin D. Yaya A. (2021). Comparative study of phosgene gas sensing using carbon and boron nitride nanomaterials—a DFT approach. Molecules26 (1), 120. 10.3390/molecules26010120
386
Lai J. A. Long Z. W. Qiu J. B. Zhou D. C. Wang Q. Yang Y. et al (2020). Novel organic-inorganic hybrid powder SrGa12O19:Mn2+-ethyl cellulose for efficient latent fingerprint recognition via time-gated fluorescence. RSC Adv.10 (14), 8233–8243. 10.1039/d0ra00138d
387
Lal K. Noble F. Arif K. M. (2022). Methamphetamine detection using nanoparticle-based biosensors: a comprehensive review. Sens. Biosensing Res.38, 100538. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100538
388
Lan J. Sun W. Chen L. Zhou H. Fan Y. Diao X. et al (2020). Simultaneous and rapid detection of carbofuran and 3-hydroxy-carbofuran in water samples and pesticide preparations using lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 165–175. 10.1080/09540105.2019.1708272
389
Latha N. Kavyashree D. Lavanya D. R. Darshan G. P. Malleshappa J. Nijalingappa T. B. et al (2021). Spectroscopic investigation of ultrasound assisted sonochemical synthesis of BiOCl: Dy3+ nanophosphors for latent fingerprints visualization. Inorg. Chem. Commun.134, 109039. 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.109039
390
Lavanya D. R. Darshan G. P. Malleshappa J. Premkumar H. B. Sharma S. C. Prasannakumar J. B. et al (2022). Surface engineered La2Zr2O7:Eu3+ nanophosphors: luminescent based platform for latent fingerprints visualization and anti-counterfeiting applications. SURFACES INTERFACES29, 101803. 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.101803
391
Lee H. Saisahas K. R. Soleh A. Kunalan A. N. H. Chang K. H. Limbut W. et al (2022c). Forensic electrochemistry: electrochemical analysis of trace methamphetamine residues on household surfaces. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (5), 056514. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6c4f
392
Lee P. L. T. Kanodarwala F. K. Lennard C. Spindler X. Spikmans V. Roux C. et al (2022b). Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: investigation into novel application procedures. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)335, 111275. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111275
393
Lee T. Kim W. Park J. Lee G. (2022a). Hemolysis-Inspired, highly sensitive, label-free IgM detection using erythrocyte membrane-functionalized nanomechanical resonators. MATERIALS.15 (21), 7738. 10.3390/ma15217738
394
Lei Y. A. Zhang Y. H. Yuan L. Li J. K. (2022). Biochar-supported Cu nanocluster as an electrochemical ultrasensitive interface for ractopamine sensing. FOOD CHEMISTRY-X15, 100404. 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100404
395
Li C. Han D. F. Liang Z. S. Han F. J. Fu W. C. Wang W. et al (2022h). Novel electrochemical-surface plasmon resonance (EC-SPR) sensor for amphetamine-type stimulants detection based on molecularly imprinted strategy. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL369, 132258. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132258
396
Li C. Han D. F. Wu Z. F. Liang Z. S. Han F. J. Chen K. et al (2022). Polydopamine-based molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor for the highly selective determination of ecstasy components. ANALYST.147 (14), 3291–3297. 10.1039/d2an00351a
397
Li D. Lv P. Xiao-Wen H. Jia Z. Zheng M. Hai-Tao F. (2023b). A highly efficient fluorescent sensor based on AIEgen for detection of nitrophenolic explosives. Molecules28 (1), 181. 10.3390/molecules28010181
398
Li D. Zhou P. P. Hu Y. F. Li G. K. Xia L. (2022f). Rapid determination of illegally added Sudan I in cake by triphenylamine functionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane fluorescence sensor. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.282, 121673. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121673
399
Li G. L. Zhang X. L. Zheng F. P. Liu J. H. Wu D. (2020e). Emerging nanosensing technologies for the detection of β-agonists. Food Chem.332, 127431. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127431
400
Li H. D. Jia R. L. Wang Y. (2020c). p-Pyridine BODIPY-based fluorescence probe for highly sensitive and selective detection of picric acid. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.228, 117793. 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117793
401
Li H. D. Zhang C. Y. Wang J. Chong H. Zhang T. Wang C. Y. (2021a). Pristine graphic carbon nitride quantum dots for the visualized detection of latent fingerprints. Anal. Sci.37 (11), 1497–1503. 10.2116/analsci.20p336
402
Li H. F. Chen J. Huang B. W. Kong L. W. Sun F. F. Li L. et al (2022e). A rapid fluorescence sensor for the direct quantification of rongalite in foodstuffs. FOODS11 (17), 2650. 10.3390/foods11172650
403
Li J. X. Chen X. Q. Zhu J. J. (2023a). DNA functionalized plasmonic nanoassemblies as SERS sensors for environmental analysis. AGGREGATE4 (2). 10.1002/agt2.271
404
Li L. Li Q. Chu J. G. Xi P. Wang C. H. Liu R. et al (2022a). Dual-mode luminescent multilayer core-shell UCNPs@SiO2@TEuTbB nanospheres for high-level anti-counterfeiting and recognition of latent fingerprints. Appl. Surf. Sci.581, 152395. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152395
405
Li L. Zhang M. Chen W. (2020f). Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric and electrochemical sensors for the detection of illegal food additives. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 642–654. 10.38212/2224-6614.3114
406
Li L. Zhang M. M. Li R. Jiang H. Liu Z. D. (2021c). Facile synthesis of highly luminescent rod-like terbium-based metal-organic frameworks for sensitive detection of olaquindox. Anal. METHODS13 (34), 3785–3791. 10.1039/d1ay00824b
407
Li R. Meng C. Wen Y. Fu W. He P. (2019a). Fluorometric lateral flow immunoassay for simultaneous determination of three mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1, zearalenone and deoxynivalenol) using quantum dot microbeads. Microchim. Acta186 (12), 748–749. 10.1007/s00604-019-3879-6
408
Li S. P. Zhou J. Y. Noroozifar M. Kerman K. (2021e). Gold-Platinum core-shell nanoparticles with thiolated polyaniline and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of six drug molecules. CHEMOSENSORS9 (2), 24. 10.3390/chemosensors9020024
409
Li W. Li X. Z. Yang T. Y. Guo X. J. Song Y. T. (2020). Detection of saliva morphine using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy combined with immunochromatographic assay. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.51 (4), 642–648. 10.1002/jrs.5822
410
Li W. Luo Y. Yue X. Q. Wu J. R. Wu R. N. Qiao Y. et al (2020h). A novel microfluidic paper-based analytical device based on chemiluminescence for the determination of β-agonists in swine hair. Anal. METHODS12 (18), 2317–2322. 10.1039/c9ay02754h
411
Li W. Sun Y. Y. Chen W. L. Song G. F. Huang M. Y. Xu J. et al (2022g). Hollow RuCu bimetallic nanospheres as emerging SERS substrates for illegal food additives detection. Mater Lett.327, 133053. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133053
412
Li X. Jiao X. Y. Li H. Derakhshandeh M. (2021d). Amphetamine drug detection with inorganic MgO nanotube based on the DFT calculations. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.193 (11), 3528–3539. 10.1007/s12010-021-03633-6
413
Li X. Wu X. Wang J. Hua Q. Wu J. Shen X. et al (2019b). Three lateral flow immunochromatographic assays based on different nanoparticle probes for on-site detection of tylosin and tilmicosin in milk and pork. Sens. Actuators B Chem.301, 127059. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127059
414
Li X. L. Ma C. Q. Li L. Gao H. Gu J. Zhu C. et al (2021b). A lanthanide complex fluorescent probe for the detection of melamine. Appl. Spectrosc.75 (10), 1312–1319. 10.1177/00037028211022375
415
Li X. M. Li J. Y. Ling J. Wang C. D. Ding Y. J. Chang Y. F. et al (2020a). A smartphone-based bacteria sensor for rapid and portable identification of forensic saliva sample. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL320, 128303. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128303
416
Li X. Y. Sun L. Xu B. Dai L. H. Xiao Y. Ding Y. M. et al (2023c). MOF-gold core-satellite nanostructure based SERS platform for fentanyl detection in multiple complex samples. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL385, 133710. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133710
417
Li Y. Xu X. Liu L. Kuang H. Xu L. Xu C. (2020d). A gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of tetrodotoxin. Analyst145 (6), 2143–2151. 10.1039/d0an00170h
418
Li Y. G. Liu X. S. Zhang G. N. Wang R. H. Yue R. M. Liao G. F. et al (2022b). Rapid and selective on-site detection of triacetone triperoxide based on visual colorimetric method. J. Chem. Res.46 (4). 10.1177/17475198221117409
419
Li Y. J. (2020). Calorimetric sensor for ethanol using Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) resin immobilized alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). Curr. Anal. Chem.16 (6), 795–799. 10.2174/1573411015666190617110233
420
Li Y. N. Liu X. X. Hou Y. Y. Wu Q. Hou J. J. (2022d). A higher affinity melamine binding aptamer mutant for more sensitive detection. ChemistrySelect7 (30). 10.1002/slct.202201427
421
Li Y. S. Zhou W. Y. Zu B. Y. Dou X. C. (2020b). Qualitative detection toward military and improvised explosive vapors by a facile TiO2 nanosheet-based chemiresistive sensor array. Front. Chem.8, 29. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00029
422
Li Y. T. Yang Y. Y. Sun Y. X. Cao Y. Huang Y. S. Han S. (2020g). Electrochemical fabrication of reduced MoS 2-based portable molecular imprinting nanoprobe for selective SERS determination of theophylline. Mikrochim. Acta187 (4), 203. 10.1007/s00604-020-4201-3
423
Li Y. Y. Peng D. (2022). Hydrophobic-binding-Driven and fluoresence-free development of aged fingerprints based on zinc oxide nanoparticles. ChemistrySelect7 (35). 10.1002/slct.202202252
424
Li Z. Xie H. Fu T. Li Y. Shen X. Li X. et al (2022c). Complementary strategy enhancing broad-specificity for multiplexed immunoassay of adulterant sulfonylureas in functional food. Biosens. (Basel).12 (8), 591. 10.3390/bios12080591
425
Lian J. Meng F. D. Wang W. Zhang Z. T. (2020b). Recent trends in fluorescent organic materials for latent fingerprint imaging. Front. Chem.8, 594864. 10.3389/fchem.2020.594864
426
Lian J. Xu Q. Wang Y. P. Meng F. D. (2020a). Recent developments in fluorescent materials for heavy metal ions analysis from the perspective of forensic chemistry. Front. Chem.8, 593291. 10.3389/fchem.2020.593291
427
Liang H. Z. Liu Y. Q. Qileng A. Shen H. R. Liu W. P. Xu Z. L. et al (2023). PEI-coated Prussian blue nanocubes as pH-Switchable nanozyme: broad-pH-responsive immunoassay for illegal additive. Biosens. Bioelectron.219, 114797. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114797
428
Liang M. Ren Y. Zhou Z. Li C. Wang C. Fu S. (2020). Monodisperse silica nanoparticle suspension for developing latent blood fingermarks. Forensic Sci. Res.5 (1), 38–46. 10.1080/20961790.2018.1446721
429
Liao L. C. Xing Y. Xiong X. L. Gan L. Hu L. Zhao F. et al (2020). An electrochemical biosensor for hypoxanthine detection in vitreous humor: a potential tool for estimating the post-mortem interval in forensic cases. Microchem. J.155, 104760. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104760
430
Liao X. F. Chen C. J. Shi P. P. Yue L. Z. (2021). Determination of melamine in milk based on β-cyclodextrin modified carbon nanoparticles via host-guest recognition. Food Chem.338, 127769. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127769
431
Liberatore N. Viola R. Mengali S. Masini L. Zardi F. Elmi I. et al (2023). Compact GC-QEPAS for on-site analysis of chemical threats. SENSORS23 (1), 270. 10.3390/s23010270
432
Lima C. D. Couto R. A. S. Arantes L. C. Marinho P. A. Pimentel D. M. Quinaz M. B. et al (2020). Electrochemical detection of the synthetic cathinone 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone using carbon screen-printed electrodes: a fast, simple and sensitive screening method for forensic samples. Electrochim Acta354, 136728. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136728
433
Lin C. H. Dhenadhayalan N. Lin K. C. (2022). Emergent carbonized polymer dots as versatile featured nanomaterial for latent fingerprints, colorimetric sensor, and photocatalysis applications. Mater Today Nano20, 100246. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100246
434
Lin H. Cheng X. Yin M. J. Bao Z. Z. Wei X. B. Gu B. B. (2020). Flexible porphyrin doped polymer optical fibers for rapid and remote detection of trace DNT vapor. ANALYST.145 (15), 5307–5313. 10.1039/d0an00706d
435
Lin H. Y. Chen W. R. Lu L. C. Chen H. L. Chen Y. H. Pan M. et al (2023b). Direct thermal growth of gold nanopearls on 3D interweaved hydrophobic fibers as ultrasensitive portable SERS substrates for clinical applications. SMALL19 (28), e2207404. 10.1002/smll.202207404
436
Lin Y. Chen X. S. Li Y. Y. Ye Y. Yang L. Liao L. C. et al (2023a). Scandium-mediated photosensitization oxidation: a new strategy for fast and neutral pH colorimetric detection of cocaine by coupling split aptamer. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL380, 133349. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133349
437
Lin Y. Sun J. F. Tang M. Zhang G. H. Yu L. Zhao X. B. et al (2021). Synergistic recognition-triggered charge transfer enables rapid visual colorimetric detection of fentanyl. Anal. Chem.93 (16), 6544–6550. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00723
438
Ling J. Zhang W. Q. Cheng Z. J. Ding Y. J. (2022). High-sensitivity detection for cantharidin by ratiometric fluorescent sensor based on molecularly imprinted nanoparticles of quantum dots. J. INDUSTRIAL Eng. Chem.112, 358–365. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.05.033
439
Liu B. Zheng S. Y. Li H. T. Xu J. J. Tang H. Y. Wang Y. et al (2022d). Ultrasensitive and facile detection of multiple trace antibiotics with magnetic nanoparticles and core-shell nanostar SERS nanotags. Talanta237, 122955. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122955
440
Liu H. Y. You Y. H. Zhu Y. Z. Zheng H. (2021). Recent advances in the exonuclease III-assisted target signal amplification strategy for nucleic acid detection. Anal. METHODS13 (43), 5103–5119. 10.1039/d1ay01275d
441
Liu J. J. Niu X. H. (2022). Rational design of nanozymes enables advanced biochemical sensing. CHEMOSENSORS10 (10), 386. 10.3390/chemosensors10100386
442
Liu L. Chen H. Y. Tian L. Sun X. Y. Zhang M. Q. (2023b). Physical visualization and squalene-based scanning electrochemical microscopy imaging of latent fingerprints on PVDF membrane. ANALYST148 (5), 1032–1040. 10.1039/d2an01940j
443
Liu M. M. Ma B. A. Wang Y. P. Chen E. J. Li J. L. Zhang M. Z. (2022e). Research on rapid detection technology for β2-agonists: multi-residue fluorescence immunochromatography based on dimeric artificial antigen. FOODS11 (6), 863. 10.3390/foods11060863
444
Liu S. Gao C. Tong Z. Y. Mu X. H. Liu B. Xu J. J. et al (2022c). A highly sensitive electrochemiluminescence method for abrin detection by a portable biosensor based on a screen-printed electrode with a phage display affibody as specific labeled probe. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (2), 1095–1104. 10.1007/s00216-021-03735-4
445
Liu W. Song Z. Zhao Y. Liu Y. He X. Methods S. C. A. et al (2020a). Flexible porous aerogels decorated with Ag nanoparticles as an effective SERS substrate for label-free trace explosives detection. Anal. Methods12, 4123–4129. 10.1039/d0ay00771d
446
Liu W. Wang X. Zhao Z. Y. Zhou X. Huang S. L. Huang L. J. et al (2022b). Tailored SiO2-TiO2 aerogel/Ag flexible films as stable SERS substrates for hazardous materials detection. Adv. Mater Technol.7 (6). 10.1002/admt.202101169
447
Liu X. Choi E. G. Cui S. Kumar K. Cho M. Chang Y. T. (2022a). Casting red light for bad oil by dual turning-on mechanisms of fluorescence and its application in the portable platform. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL365, 131866. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131866
448
Liu X. F. Deng J. X. Li J. W. Dong J. B. Liu H. Zhao J. S. et al (2023a). B-doped graphene quantum dots array as fluorescent sensor platforms for plasticizers detection. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL376, 132989. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132989
449
Liu Y. J. Zhang L. Y. (2020). The development of latent fingermarks for visualization by using aunps@auncs core/shell nanoparticles. Nano15 (10), 2050132. 10.1142/s1793292020501325
450
Liu Y. Z. Yu H. X. Alkhamis O. Moliver J. Xiao Y. (2020b). Tuning biosensor cross-reactivity using aptamer mixtures. Anal. Chem.92 (7), 5041–5047. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05339
451
Liyanage T. Masterson A. N. Hati S. Ren G. Manicke N. E. Rusyniak D. E. et al (2020). Optimization of electromagnetic hot spots in surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates for an ultrasensitive drug assay of emergency department patients’ plasma. ANALYST145 (23), 7662–7672. 10.1039/d0an01372b
452
Locard E. (1920). L’Enqueˆte criminelle et les Methodes scientifiques. Paris: E. Flammarion.
453
Loch A. S. Burn P. L. Shaw P. E. (2023). Fluorescent sensors for the detection of free-base illicit drugs-Effect of tuning the electronic properties. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL387, 133766. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133766
454
Long D. A. (1977). Raman spectroscopy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Available online at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DzUXBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA149&dq=raman+spectroscopy&ots=oZhyDeeWaR&sig=SMiumhxoCedGa4WwpgeqMMLjfHw.
455
Loredana M. Alina A. Dragomir I. S. Bucataru I. C. Jonggwan P. Ho S. C. et al (2020). Sequence-specific detection of single-stranded DNA with a gold nanoparticle-protein nanopore approach. Sci. Rep. Nat. Publ. Group.10 (1), 11323. 10.1038/s41598-020-68258-x
456
Lu L. X. Xu L. X. Zhang Y. L. Jiang T. (2022). Multiplexed surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of melamine and dicyandiamide in dairy food enabled by three-dimensional polystyrene@silver@graphene oxide hybrid substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci.603, 154419. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154419
457
Lu R. Q. Qi Z. K. Wang S. Y. Tian X. G. Xu X. Y. (2021). Rapid detection of illegal biguanides in hypoglycemic health products using molecular imprinting combined with SERS technology. Microchem. J.169, 106523. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106523
458
Luo H. Z. Liu S. Shi L. N. Li Z. Bai Q. W. Du X. X. et al (2022). Paper-based fluidic sensing platforms for β-adrenergic agonist residue point-of-care testing. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (7), 518. 10.3390/bios12070518
459
Ma B. Wang X. F. Gao S. Qi L. H. Xu Y. Yang J. X. et al (2020). Iridium(Ⅲ) complex-based phosphorescent probe for rapid, specific, and sensitive detection of phosgene. DYES PIGMENTS.177, 108279. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108279
460
Maashi M. S. (2023). CRISPR/Cas-based aptasensor as an innovative sensing approaches for food safety analysis: recent progresses and new horizons. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 2599–2617. 10.1080/10408347.2023.2188955
461
Machado T. R. da Silva J. S. Miranda R. R. Zucolotto V. Li M. S. de Yuso M. V. M. et al (2022). Amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles allow fingerprint detection via self-activated luminescence. Chem. Eng. J.443, 136443. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136443
462
Madani-Nejad E. Shokrollahi A. Shahdost-Fard F. (2023). A smartphone-based colorimetric assay using Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles as the nanoprobes for visual tracing of fluvoxamine in biofluids as a common suicide drug. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc., 296. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122665
463
Mahmudiono T. Bokov D. O. Jasim S. A. Abdelbasset W. K. Khashirbaeva D. M. (2022). State-of-the-art of convenient and low-cost electrochemical sensor for food contamination detection: technical and analytical overview. Microchem. J.179, 107460. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107460
464
Malahom N. Jarujamrus P. Anutrasakda W. Chawengkirttikul R. Siripinyanond A. Meelapsom R. et al (2020). Novel paper-based colorimetric immunoassay (PCI) for sensitive and specific detection of salbutamol residues in flesh of swine and urine using Ag3PO4/Ag nanocomposite as label. J. Food Sci.85 (1), 209–219. 10.1111/1750-3841.14974
465
Malik A. H. Zehra N. Ahmad M. Parui R. Iyer P. K. (2020). Advances in conjugated polymers for visualization of latent fingerprints: a critical perspective. NEW J. Chem.44 (45), 19423–19439. 10.1039/d0nj04131a
466
Mandal P. Tewari B. S. (2022). Progress in surface enhanced Raman scattering molecular sensing: a review. SURFACES INTERFACES28, 101655. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101655
467
Mani V. Beduk T. Khushaim W. Ceylan A. E. Timur S. Wolfbeis O. S. et al (2021). Electrochemical sensors targeting salivary biomarkers: a comprehensive review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.135, 116164. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116164
468
Mansouri M. Khalilzadeh B. Barzegari A. Shoeibi S. Isildak S. Bargahi N. et al (2020). Design a highly specific sequence for electrochemical evaluation of meat adulteration in cooked sausages. Biosens. Bioelectron.150, 111916. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111916
469
Mao G. Liu C. Yang N. Yang L. He G. (2021b). Design and synthesis of a fluorescent probe based on copper complex for selective detection of hydrogen sulfide. J. Sens.2021. 10.1155/2021/8822558
470
Mao J. K. Kang Y. L. Yu D. D. Zhou J. G. (2021d). Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy integrated with aligner mediated cleavage strategy for ultrasensitive and selective detection of methamphetamine. Anal. Chim. Acta.1146, 124–130. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.12.028
471
Mao K. Yang Z. G. Zhang H. Li X. Q. Cooper J. M. (2021c). Paper-based nanosensors to evaluate community-wide illicit drug use for wastewater-based epidemiology. Water Res.189, 116559. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116559
472
Mao K. Zhang H. Pan Y. W. Yang Z. G. (2021a). Biosensors for wastewater-based epidemiology for monitoring public health. Water Res.191, 116787. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116787
473
Mao K. Zhang H. Pan Y. W. Zhang K. K. Cao H. R. Li X. Q. et al (2020). Nanomaterial-based aptamer sensors for analysis of illicit drugs and evaluation of drugs consumption for wastewater-based epidemiology. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.130, 115975. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115975
474
Mao S. H. Pei F. B. Feng S. S. Hao Q. L. Zhang P. J. Tong Z. Y. et al (2023). Detection of trace Rhodamine B using stable, uniformity, and reusable SERS substrate based on Ag@SiO2-Au nanoparticles. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS657, 130595. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130595
475
María-Hormigos R. Molinero-Fernández Á. López M. Á. Jurado-Sánchez B. Escarpa A. (2022). Prussian blue/chitosan micromotors with intrinsic enzyme-like activity for (bio)-Sensing assays. Anal. Chem.94 (14), 5575–5582. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05173
476
Marques L. Félix L. Cruz G. Coelho V. Caetano J. Vale A. et al (2023). Neutron and gamma-ray detection system coupled to a multirotor for screening of shipping container cargo. Sensors23 (1), 329. 10.3390/s23010329
477
Masemola D. P. Mafa P. J. Nyoni H. Mamba B. B. Msagati T. A. M. (2020). Gold nanoparticles modified exfoliated graphite electrode as electrochemical sensor in the determination of psychoactive drug. J. Environ. Sci. HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD Contam. Agric. WASTES55 (5), 455–461. 10.1080/03601234.2020.1713670
478
Mayer B. P. Kennedy D. J. Lau E. Y. Valdez C. A. (2023). Evaluation of polyanionic cyclodextrins as high affinity binding scaffolds for fentanyl. Sci. Rep.13 (1), 2680. 10.1038/s41598-023-29662-1
479
McGoldrick L. K. Halámek J. (2020). Recent advances in noninvasive biosensors for forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. Sensors20 (21), 5974. 10.3390/s20215974
480
McKeever C. Callan S. Warren S. Dempsey E. (2022). Magnetic nanoparticle modified electrodes for voltammetric determination of propellant stabiliser diphenylamine. Talanta238, 123039. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123039
481
Medyantseva E. P. Gazizullina E. R. Brusnitsyn D. V. Fedorenko S. V. Mustafina A. R. Eremin S. A. (2022). Determination of amitriptyline by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. J. Anal. Chem.77 (9), 1147–1154. 10.1134/s1061934822070085
482
Mégarbane B. Oberlin M. Alvarez J. C. Balen F. Beaune S. Bédry R. et al (2020). Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ann. Intensive Care10 (1), 157–230. 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9
483
Mei L. Shi Y. M. Shi Y. E. Yan P. P. Lin C. L. Sun Y. et al (2022). Multivalent SnO2 quantum dot-decorated Ti3C2 MXene for highly sensitive electrochemical detection of Sudan I in food. ANALYST.147 (23), 5557–5563. 10.1039/d2an01432g
484
Meir R. Zverzhinetsky M. Harpak N. Borberg E. Burstein L. Zeiri O. et al (2020). Direct detection of uranyl in urine by dissociation from aptamer-modified nanosensor arrays. Anal. Chem.92 (18), 12528–12537. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02387
485
Melman Y. Wells P. K. Katz E. Smutok O. (2022). A universal nanostructured bioanalytical platform for NAD+-dependent enzymes based on the fluorescent output reading with a smartphone. Talanta243, 123325. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123325
486
Mengjun H. Peng D. (2021). A rapid and dual-mode visualization of latent and bloody fingermarks using Cr- and Sb-codoped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Mater Sci.56 (9), 5543–5554. 10.1007/s10853-020-05651-x
487
Merck (2025). Water, food and environmental analytics catalog. Anal. and Sample Prep. Available online at: https://www.merckmillipore.com/GB/en/20170308_183420.
488
Mereuta L. Asandei A. Dragomir I. Park J. Park Y. Luchian T. (2022). A nanopore sensor for multiplexed detection of short polynucleotides based on length-variable, poly-arginine-conjugated peptide nucleic acids. Anal. Chem.94 (24), 8774–8782. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01587
489
META (2016). “Megatrends affecting science, technology and innovation,” in OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2016.
490
Methley A. M. Campbell S. Chew-Graham C. McNally R. Cheraghi-Sohi S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv. Res.14, 579. 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
491
Ministry of Justice (2023). Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: december 2022 - GOV. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022.
492
Mishra S. Rani S. Ray S. J. (2020). Single electron transistor based nanosensor for DNA and RNA detection. J. Appl. Phys.128 (19). 10.1063/5.0016104
493
Mitri F. De Iacovo A. De Santis S. Sotgiu G. Colace L. (2022). “Quantum dots for explosive detection in air-two complimentary approaches,” in Prime 2022 - 17th international conference on PhD research in microelectronics and electronics, proceedings, 53–56.
494
Mittal S. Laishram K. Inamdar S. Das N. R. Razdan A. K. (2020). Narcotic drug detection and identification through synchronous fluorescence technique. Def. Sci. J.70 (5), 534–537. 10.14429/dsj.70.16338
495
Mobileidworld (2013). Cross match introduces new SEEK avenger handheld. Available online at: https://mobileidworld.com/archive/cross-match-introduces-new-seek-avenger-handheld/.
496
Mohamad N. R. Buang N. A. Mahat N. A. Jamalis J. Huyop F. Aboul-Enein H. Y. et al (2015). Simple adsorption of Candida rugosa lipase onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes for sustainable production of the flavor ester geranyl propionate. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.32, 99–108. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.001
497
Mohan J. M. Amreen K. Kulkarni M. B. Javed A. Dubey S. K. Goel S. (2021). Optimized ink jetted paper device for electroanalytical detection of picric acid. COLLOIDS SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES208, 112056. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112056
498
Molinara M. Bourelly C. Ferrigno L. Gerevini L. Vitelli M. Ria A. et al (2022). “A new dataset for detection of illegal or suspicious spilling in wastewater through low-cost real-time sensors,” in Proceedings - 2022 IEEE international conference on smart computing (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)), 293–298.
499
Monago-Maraña O. Eskildsen C. E. de la Peña A. M. Galeano-Díaz T. Wold J. P. (2020). Non-destructive fluorescence spectroscopy combined with second-order calibration as a new strategy for the analysis of the illegal Sudan I dye in paprika powder. Microchem. J.154, 104539. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104539
500
Montali L. Calabretta M. M. Lopreside A. D’Elia M. Guardigli M. Michelini E. (2020). Multienzyme chemiluminescent foldable biosensor for on-site detection of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Biosens. Bioelectron.162, 112232. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112232
501
Moon D. Cha Y. K. Kim S. O. Cho S. Ko H. J. Park T. H. (2020). FET-based nanobiosensors for the detection of smell and taste. Sci. CHINA-LIFE Sci.63 (8), 1159–1167. 10.1007/s11427-019-1571-8
502
Moradi R. Khalili N. P. Septiani N. W. Liu C. H. Doustkhah E. Yamauchi Y. et al (2022). Nanoarchitectonics for abused-drug biosensors. SMALL18 (10), e2104847. 10.1002/smll.202104847
503
Morita I. Kiguchi Y. Oyama H. Yamaki K. Sakio N. Kashiwabara K. et al (2022). Derivatization-assisted immunoassays: application for group-specific detection of potent methamphetamine and amphetamine enantiomers. Anal. METHODS14 (28), 2745–2753. 10.1039/d2ay00940d
504
Mostafa I. M. Meng C. D. Dong Z. X. Lou B. H. Xu G. B. (2022). Potentiometric sensors for the determination of pharmaceutical drugs. Anal. Sci.38 (1), 23–37. 10.2116/analsci.21sar02
505
Mousaabadi K. Z. Ensafi A. A. Rezaei B. (2022). Simultaneous determination of some opioid drugs using Cu-hemin MOF@MWCNTs as an electrochemical sensor. Chemosphere303, 135149. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135149
506
Murahashi M. Makinodan M. Yui M. Hibi T. Kobayashi M. (2020). Immunochromatographic detection of human hemoglobin from deteriorated bloodstains due to methamphetamine contamination, aging, and heating. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (23), 5799–5809. 10.1007/s00216-020-02802-6
507
Musile G. Agard Y. Wang L. De Palo E. F. McCord B. Tagliaro F. (2021). Paper-based microfluidic devices: on-site tools for crime scene investigation. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.143, 116406. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116406
508
Mustafa F. Carhart M. Andreescu S. (2021). A 3D-printed breath analyzer incorporating CeO2 nanoparticles for colorimetric enzyme-based ethanol sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater4 (9), 9361–9369. 10.1021/acsanm.1c01826
509
Mutz Y. S. do Rosario D. Silva L. R. G. Galvan D. Janegitz B. C. Ferreira R. D. et al (2022). A single screen-printed electrode in tandem with chemometric tools for the forensic differentiation of Brazilian beers. Sci. Rep.12 (1), 5630. 10.1038/s41598-022-09632-9
510
Myadam N. L. Nadargi D. Y. Nadargi J. D. Kudkyal V. R. Shaikh F. I. Mulla I. S. et al (2021). Ni/SnO2 xerogels via epoxide chemistry: potential candidate for H2S gas sensing application. J. Porous Mater.28 (1), 239–248. 10.1007/s10934-020-00970-5
511
Na G. Q. Hu X. F. Sun Y. N. Kwee S. Xing G. X. Xing Y. R. et al (2020). A highly sensitive monoclonal antibody-based paper sensor for simultaneously detecting valnemulin and tiamulin in porcine liver. J. Food Sci.85 (6), 1681–1688. 10.1111/1750-3841.15136
512
Nadar S. S. Kelkar R. K. Pise P. V. Patil N. P. Patil S. P. Chaubal-Durve N. S. et al (2021). The untapped potential of magnetic nanoparticles for forensic investigations: a comprehensive review. Talanta230, 122297. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122297
513
Nagabooshanam S. Sharma S. Roy S. Mathur A. Krishnamurthy S. Bharadwaj L. M. (2021). Development of field deployable sensor for detection of pesticide from food chain. IEEE Sens. J.21 (4), 4129–4134. 10.1109/jsen.2020.3030034
514
Naik V. M. Gunjal D. B. Gore A. H. Anbhule P. V. Sohn D. Bhosale S. V. et al (2020). Nitrogen-doped carbon dot threads as a “turn-off” fluorescent probe for permanganate ions and its hydrogel hybrid as a naked eye sensor for gold(III) ions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (12), 2993–3003. 10.1007/s00216-020-02550-7
515
Narasimhamurthy K. N. Darshan G. P. Sharma S. C. Premkumar H. B. Adarsha H. Nagabhushana H. (2021). Surface functionalized inorganic phosphor by grafting organic antenna for long term preservation of latent fingerprints and data-security applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci.600, 887–897. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.029
516
Nardo F. Di Chiarello M. Cavalera S. Baggiani C. Anfossi L. (2021). Ten years of lateral flow immunoassay technique applications: trends, challenges and future perspectives. Sensors21 (15), 5185. 10.3390/s21155185
517
Naresh V. Lee N. (2021). A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors21 (4), 1109. 10.3390/s21041109
518
Navami D. Darshan G. P. Basavaraj R. B. Sharma S. C. Kavyashree D. Venkatachalaiah K. N. et al (2020). Shape controllable ultrasound assisted fabrication of CaZrO3:Dy3+ hierarchical structures for display, dosimetry and advanced forensic applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-CHEMISTRY.389, 112248. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112248
519
Nayini M. M. R. Sayadian H. Razavipour N. Rezazade M. (2020). Chemical-sensing of Amphetamine drug by inorganic AlN nano-cage: a DFT/TDDFT study. Inorg. Chem. Commun.121, 108237. 10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108237
520
NCJRS Virtual Library (2001). Scientific working group on friction ridge analysis, study and technology. J. Forensic Identif.Available online at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/scientific-working-group-friction-ridge-analysis-study-and.
521
Neal R. D. Hughes R. A. Preston A. S. Golze S. D. Demille T. B. Neretina S. (2021). Substrate-immobilized noble metal nanoplates: a review of their synthesis, assembly, and application. J. Mater Chem. C Mater9 (38), 12974–13012. 10.1039/d1tc01494c
522
Neng J. Wang Y. Z. Zhang Y. L. Chen P. Yang K. (2023). MIPs-SERS sensor based on Ag NPs film for selective detection of enrofloxacin in food. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.13 (3), 330. 10.3390/bios13030330
523
Neng J. Zhang Q. Sun P. L. (2020). Application of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in fast detection of toxic and harmful substances in food. Biosens. Bioelectron.167, 112480. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112480
524
Neurotechnology (2025). Cross match L SCAN guardian USB/FW fingerprint scanners. Available online at: https://neurotechnology.com/fingerprint-scanner-cross-match-l-scan-guardian.html.
525
Ngo H. T. Nguyen V. T. Tran D. M. Toan T. T. T. Triet N. T. M. Nguyen T. B. et al (2020). “Voltammetric determination of rhodamine B using a ZIF-67/reduced graphene oxide modified electrode,”. Editor LiuY., 2020, 1–14. 10.1155/2020/4679061
526
Nguyen Y. T. Shin S. Kwon K. Kim N. Bae S. W. (2023). BODIPY-based fluorescent sensors for detection of explosives. J. Chem. Res.47 (2). 10.1177/17475198231168961
527
Nie X. Dong K. Tian Y. Zong C. Chen Z. Wang X. et al (2023). A green analysis detection of formaldehyde in grooming products by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Mater. TODAY Sustain.22, 100303. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100303
528
NIST (2025). Fire debris and explosives. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Available online at: https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/fire-debris-and-explosives.
529
Noh D. Ampadu E. K. Oh E. (2022). Influence of air flow on luminescence quenching in polymer films towards explosives detection using drones. Polym. (Basel)14 (3), 483. 10.3390/polym14030483
530
Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service Fire Investigation (FI) (2013). Service information system.
531
Novais A. D. Arantes L. C. Almeida E. S. Rocha R. G. Lima C. D. Melo L. M. D. et al (2022). Fast on-site screening of 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) in forensic samples using carbon screen-printed electrode and square wave voltammetry. Electrochim Acta403, 139599. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139599
532
Noviana E. McCord C. P. Clark K. M. Jang I. Henry C. S. (2019). Electrochemical paper-based devices: sensing approaches and progress toward practical applications. Lab. Chip20 (1), 9–34. 10.1039/c9lc00903e
533
NPCC (2025). Nearly 9,000 drivers caught drink or drug driving. Available online at: https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/nearly-9-000-drivers-caught-drink-or-drug-driving-in-six-week-police-operation.
534
NPSA (2025). Canine detection. Available online at: https://www.npsa.gov.uk/canine-detection-0.
535
Nsuamani M. L. Zolotovskaya S. Abdolvand A. Daeid N. N. Adegoke O. (2022). Thiolated gamma-cyclodextrin-polymer-functionalized CeFe3O4 magnetic nanocomposite as an intrinsic nanocatalyst for the selective and ultrasensitive colorimetric detection of triacetone triperoxide. Chemosphere307, 136108. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136108
536
Nugroho D. Chanthai S. Oh W. C. Benchawattananon R. (2023). Fluorophores-rich natural powder from selected medicinal plants for detection latent fingerprints and cyanide. Sci. Prog.106 (1), 368504231156217. 10.1177/00368504231156217
537
Nugroho D. Keawprom C. Chanthai S. Oh W. C. Benchawattananon R. (2022a). Highly sensitive fingerprint detection under UV light on non-porous surface using starch-powder based luminol-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) from tender coconut water as a green carbon source. NANOMATERIALS12 (3), 400. 10.3390/nano12030400
538
Nugroho D. Oh W. C. Chanthai S. Benchawattananon R. (2022b). Improving minutiae image of latent fingerprint detection on non-porous surface materials under UV light using sulfur doped carbon quantum dots from magnolia grandiflora flower. NANOMATERIALS12 (19), 3277. 10.3390/nano12193277
539
Nurazzi N. M. Harussani M. M. Zulaikha N. D. S. Norhana A. H. Syakir M. I. Norli A. (2021). Composites based on conductive polymer with carbon nanotubes in DMMP gas sensors - an overview. Polimery/Polymers66 (2), 85–97. 10.14314/polimery.2021.2.1
540
Nurfarhana H. Tahir A. Mahat N. A. Hasmerya M. Keat H. F. (2022). Counterfeit fifty Ringgit Malaysian banknotes authentication using novel graph-based chemometrics method. Sci. Rep. Nat. Publ. Group.12 (1), 4826. 10.1038/s41598-022-08821-w
541
Office for National Statistics (2022). Crime in england and wales: year ending march 2022 - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-in-england-and-wales-year-ending-march-2022.
542
Official Statistics (2022). Drug misuse in england and wales: year ending june 2022 - GOV.UK. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/drug-misuse-in-england-and-wales-year-ending-june-2022.
543
Official Statistics (2025). Crime outcomes in england and wales 2021 to 2022 - GOV. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022.
544
Olean-Oliveira A. Trevizan H. F. Cardoso C. X. Teixeira M. F. S. (2023). Impedimetric study of the electrocatalytic oxidation of alcohols by nickel-Schiff base metallopolymer: potential application for forensic identification of alcoholic beverage contaminants by multivariate data analysis. Talanta253, 124029. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124029
545
Olszowska I. Lesniewski A. Kelm A. Pieta I. S. Siejca A. Niedziólka-Jönsson J. (2020). Zinc oxide quantum dots embedded in hydrophobic silica particles for latent fingermarks visualization based on time-gated luminescence measurements. Methods Appl. Fluoresc.8 (2), 025001. 10.1088/2050-6120/ab6f24
546
Ondieki A. M. Birech Z. Kaduki K. A. Mwangi P. W. Mwenze N. M. Juma M. et al (2023). Fabrication of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates using silver nanoparticles produced by laser ablation in liquids. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.296, 122694. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122694
547
Ong V. Cortez N. R. Xu Z. R. Amirghasemi F. Abd El-Rahman M. K. Mousavi M. P. S. (2023). An accessible Yarn-based sensor for in-field detection of Succinylcholine poisoning. CHEMOSENSORS11 (3), 175. 10.3390/chemosensors11030175
548
Ortiz-Aguayo D. Cetó X. De Wael K. del Valle M. (2022). Resolution of opiate illicit drugs signals in the presence of some cutting agents with use of a voltammetric sensor array and machine learning strategies. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL357, 131345. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131345
549
Ott C. E. Cunha-Silva H. Kuberski S. L. Cox J. A. Arcos-Martínez M. J. Arroyo-Mora L. E. (2020). Electrochemical detection of fentanyl with screen-printed carbon electrodes using square-wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry for forensic applications. J. Electroanal. Chem.873, 114425. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114425
550
Ouyang S. Y. Yu S. T. Le Y. Y. (2022). Current advances in immunoassays for the detection of β2-agonists. FOODS11 (6), 803. 10.3390/foods11060803
551
Özgür E. Saylan Y. Bereli N. Türkmen D. Denizli A. (2020). Molecularly imprinted polymer integrated plasmonic nanosensor for cocaine detection. J. BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER Ed.31 (9), 1211–1222. 10.1080/09205063.2020.1751524
552
Pal A. Kaswan K. Barman S. R. Lin Y. Z. Chung J. H. Sharma M. K. et al (2023). Microfluidic nanodevices for drug sensing and screening applications. Biosens. Bioelectron.219, 114783. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114783
553
Pan M. Ma T. Yang J. Li S. Liu S. Wang S. (2020). Development of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays using colloidal Au Sphere and nanorods as signal marker for the determination of zearalenone in Cereals. Foods9 (3), 281. 10.3390/foods9030281
554
Pan Y. C. Liu X. Liu J. Wang J. P. Liu J. X. Gao Y. X. et al (2022). Chemiluminescence sensors based on molecularly imprinted polymers for the determination of organophosphorus in milk. J. Dairy Sci.105 (4), 3019–3031. 10.3168/jds.2021-21213
555
Papadopoulos F. Diamanteas K. Economou A. Kokkinos C. (2020). Rapid drop-volume electrochemical detection of the “date rape” drug flunitrazepam in Spirits using a screen-printed sensor in a Dry-reagent format. Sensors20 (18), 5192. 10.3390/s20185192
556
Papaioannou G. C. Karastogianni S. Girousi S. (2022). Development of an electrochemical sensor using a modified carbon paste electrode with silver nanoparticles capped with saffron for monitoring mephedrone. SENSORS22 (4), 1625. 10.3390/s22041625
557
Pappalardo A. Gangemi C. M. A. Toscano R. M. Sfrazzetto G. T. (2020). A new fluorescent salen-uranyl sensor for the sub-ppm detection of chemical warfare agents. Curr. Org. Chem.24 (20), 2378–2382. 10.2174/1385272824999200930150313
558
Paprocki S. Qassem M. Kyriacou P. A. (2022). Review of ethanol intoxication sensing technologies and techniques. SENSORS22 (18), 6819. 10.3390/s22186819
559
Parkhey P. Mohan S. V. (2018). “Biosensing applications of microbial fuel cell: approach toward miniaturization,” in Microbial electrochemical technology (Elsevier), 977–997.
560
Parrilla M. Joosten F. De Wael K. (2021). Enhanced electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in oral fluid by the use of surfactant-mediated solution. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL348, 130659. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130659
561
Parrilla M. Slosse A. Van Echelpoel R. Montiel N. F. Langley A. R. Van Durme F. et al (2022). Rapid on-site detection of illicit drugs in smuggled samples with a portable electrochemical device. CHEMOSENSORS10 (3), 108. 10.3390/chemosensors10030108
562
Parungao D. Vandenabeele P. Edwards H. G. M. Candeias A. Miguel C. (2022). Mobile Raman spectroscopy analysis of elephant ivory objects. J. Raman Spectrosc.54, 1297–1302. 10.1002/jrs.6487
563
Paschoarelli M. V. V. Kavai M. S. de Lima L. F. de Araujo W. R. (2023). Laser-scribing fabrication of a disposable electrochemical device for forensic detection of crime facilitating drugs in beverage samples. Talanta255, 124214. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124214
564
Patil G. Dongre S. D. Das T. Babu S. S. (2020). Dual mode selective detection and differentiation of TNT from other nitroaromatic compounds. J. Mater Chem. A Mater8 (21), 10767–10771. 10.1039/d0ta02091e
565
Patiti C. Sfragano P. S. Laschi S. Pillozzi S. Boddi A. Crociani O. et al (2022). Chip-based and wearable tools for isothermal amplification and electrochemical analysis of nucleic acids. CHEMOSENSORS10 (7), 278. 10.3390/chemosensors10070278
566
Pattarith K. Benchawattananon R. (2020). The novel photoluminescence powder synthesized from zinc carbonate nanoparticles associated with fluorescein dye for its latent fingerprint detection. Orient. J. Chem.36 (2), 237–243. 10.13005/ojc/360204
567
Paul M. Tannenberg R. Tscheuschner G. Ponader M. Weller M. G. (2021). Cocaine detection by a laser-induced immunofluorometric biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (9), 313. 10.3390/bios11090313
568
Paul M. Tscheuschner G. Herrmann S. Weller M. G. (2020). Fast detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) at ppt level by a laser-induced immunofluorometric biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.10 (8), 89. 10.3390/bios10080089
569
Pavitra E. Raju G. S. R. Park J. Y. Hussain S. K. Chodankar N. R. Rao G. M. et al (2020). An efficient far-red emitting Ba2LaNbO6:Mn4+ nanophosphor for forensic latent fingerprint detection and horticulture lighting applications. Ceram. Int.46 (7), 9802–9809. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.253
570
Paxton N. Smolan W. Böck T. Mary F. B. Sophia Ponraj J. Dhanabalan B. et al (2021). Forensic analysis on printer inks via chemometrics. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater Sci. Eng.1192 (1), 012029. 10.1088/1757-899X/1192/1/012029
571
Peltomaa R. Barderas R. Benito-Peña E. Moreno-Bondi M. C. (2022). Recombinant antibodies and their use for food immunoanalysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.414 (1), 193–217. 10.1007/s00216-021-03619-7
572
Pena-Pereira F. Bendicho C. Pavlović D. M. Martín-Esteban A. Díaz-Álvarez M. Pan Y. et al (2021). Miniaturized analytical methods for determination of environmental contaminants of emerging concern – a review. Anal. Chim. Acta.1158, 238108. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.040
573
Peng D. He S. A. Zhang Y. Y. Yao L. Q. Nie W. D. Liao Z. J. et al (2022). Blue light-induced rare-earth free phosphors for the highly sensitive and selective imaging of latent fingerprints based on enhanced hydrophobic interaction. J. MATERIOMICS8 (1), 229–238. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.03.005
574
Peng D. Zhao Z. H. (2023). Highly efficient ferric ion sensing and high resolution latent fingerprint imaging based on fluorescent silicon quantum dots. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.299, 122827. 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122827
575
Peng D. P. Kavanagh O. Gao H. J. Zhang X. Y. Deng S. J. Chen D. M. et al (2020). Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the determination of 3-methyl-quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acid, the marker residue of olaquindox, in swine tissues. Food Chem.302, 124623. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.022
576
Pereira de Oliveira L. Rocha D. P. Reis de Araujo W. Munoz R. A. A. Paixao TRLC Salles M. O. (2018). Forensics in hand: new trends in forensic devices (2013–2017). Anal. Methods10 (43), 5135–5163. 10.1039/c8ay01389f
577
PerkinElmer (2025). “Spectrum two N FT-NIR spectrometer,”. Waltham, MA: PerkinElmer, Inc. Available online at: https://www.perkinelmer.com/uk/product/spectrum-two-n-ft-nir-sp10-l1390021.
578
Pholsiri T. Khamcharoen W. Vimolmangkang S. Siangproh W. Chailapakul O. (2023). Paper-based electrochemical sensor for simultaneous detection of salivary Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and thiocyanate to differentiate illegal cannabis smokers. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL383, 133571. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133571
579
Picone A. L. Védova C. O. D. Romano R. M. (2020). Study on the detection of cocaine in Argentinian banknotes by SERS. Vib. Spectrosc.110, 103136. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2020.103136
580
Pierpaoli M. Lewkowicz A. Dee B. Nadolska M. Bogdanowicz R. (2022). Impedimetric sensing of α-amino acids driven by micro-patterned 1,8-Diazafluoren-9-one into titania-boron- doped maze-like nanocarbons. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL371, 132459. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132459
581
Pinto A. H. Nogueira A. E. Dalmaschio C. J. Frigini I. N. de Almeida J. C. Ferrer M. M. et al (2022). Doped tin dioxide (d-SnO2) and its nanostructures: review of the theoretical aspects, photocatalytic and biomedical applications. Solids3 (2), 327–360. 10.3390/solids3020024
582
Pliatsikas N. Kalfagiannis N. Arvanitidis J. Christofilos D. Koutsogeorgis D. C. Kagkoura A. et al (2021). Edge-engineered self-assembled hierarchical plasmonic SERS templates. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv.6, 100186. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100186
583
Pogăcean F. Varodi C. Măgeruşan L. Staden R. I. S. van Pruneanu S. (2022). Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of azithromycin with graphene-modified electrode. Sensors22 (16), 6181. 10.3390/s22166181
584
Pohanka M. (2022). Electrochemical hand-held biosensors for biological warfare agents assay. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (9), 220961. 10.20964/2022.09.58
585
Pöhlmann C. Elßner T. (2020). Multiplex immunoassay techniques for on-site detection of security sensitive toxins. Toxins (Basel).12 (11), 727. 10.3390/toxins12110727
586
Police Law Enforcement Solutions (2018). Deployment strategies for handheld thermal imagers | police magazine. Available online at: https://www.policemag.com/technology/article/15346300/flir-systems-deployment-strategies-for-handheld-thermal-imagers.
587
Pollock S. Crick D. R. Winter L. J. Kemp M. C. (2021). Multi-sensor threat detection for screening people and their carried bags. Available online at: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11749/1174908/Multi-sensor-threat-detection-for-screening-people-and-their-carried/10.1117/12.2585744.full.10.1117/12.2585744
588
Pospisilová E. Paskanová N. Kuchar M. Shishkanova T. V. (2023). Potentiometric determination of mephedrone in oral fluids with ion-selective membranes. Electroanalysis35 (6). 10.1002/elan.202200468
589
Poulladofonou G. Freris C. Economou A. Kokkinos C. (2022). Wearable electronic finger for date rape drugs screening: from “do-it-yourself” fabrication to self-testing. Anal. Chem.94 (9), 4087–4094. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00015
590
Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2020a). Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent Europium (III) complex based on D-dextrose composite for latent fingerprint detection. J. SAUDI Chem. Soc.24 (8), 584–605. 10.1016/j.jscs.2020.06.002
591
Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2020b). Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent N-CDs/ZnONPs nanocomposite for latent fingerprint detection by using powder brushing method. ARABIAN J. Chem.13 (2), 3817–3835. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.01.004
592
Prabakaran E. Pillay K. (2021). Nanomaterials for latent fingerprint detection: a review. J. Mater. Res. TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T12, 1856–1885. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.110
593
Pragya S. V. Rangan K. Khungar B. (2022). A pyrazinium-based fluorescent chemosensor for the selective detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol in an aqueous medium. NEW J. Chem.46 (35), 16907–16913. 10.1039/d2nj02999e
594
Pramanik S. Mukherjee S. Dey S. Mukherjee S. Das S. Ghosh T. et al (2022). Cooperative effects of zinc interstitials and oxygen vacancies on violet-bluep hotoluminescence of ZnO nanoparticles: UV radiation induced enhanced latent fingerprint detection. J. Lumin251, 119156. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119156
595
Prasad V. Lukose S. Agarwal P. Prasad L. (2020). Role of nanomaterials for forensic investigation and latent fingerprinting—a review. J. Forensic Sci.65, 26–36. 10.1111/1556-4029.14172
596
Prasad V. Prasad L. Lukose S. Agarwal P. (2021). Latent fingerprint development by using silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate-A comparative study. J. Forensic Sci.66 (3), 1065–1074. 10.1111/1556-4029.14664
597
Praveen V. K. Vedhanarayanan B. Mal A. Mishra R. K. Ajayaghosh A. (2020). Self-Assembled extended π-systems for sensing and security applications. Acc. Chem. Res.53 (2), 496–507. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00580
598
Press Release (2018). Police trial new Home Office mobile fingerprint technology. London, United Kingdom: UK Home Office. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/police-trial-new-home-office-mobile-fingerprint-technology.
599
Prlainović N. Ž. Bezbradica D. I. Knežević-Jugović Z. D. Stevanović S. I. Avramov Ivić M. L. Uskoković P. S. et al (2013). Adsorption of lipase from Candida rugosa on multi walled carbon nanotubes. J. Industrial Eng. Chem.19 (1), 279–285. 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.012
600
Promsuwan K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Limbut W. (2020a). Nitrite amperometric sensor for gunshot residue screening. Electrochim Acta331, 135309. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135309
601
Promsuwan K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Limbut W. (2020b). Subnanomolar detection of promethazine abuse using a gold nanoparticle-graphene nanoplatelet-modified electrode. Microchim. ACTA187 (12), 646. 10.1007/s00604-020-04616-w
602
ProPublica (2025). “Courts are beginning to prevent the use of roadside drug tests,”. New York City, NY: ProPublica. Available online at: https://www.propublica.org/article/do-courts-use-roadside-drug-tests-accuracy.
603
Puiu M. Bala C. (2022). Affinity assays for cannabinoids detection: are they amenable to on-site screening?BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (8), 608. 10.3390/bios12080608
604
Puttasakul T. Tancharoen C. Sukjee W. Sangma C. (2022). Vapor-phase substrate nitroreductase reaction and its application as TNT electrochemical gas sensor. IEEE Sens. J.22 (23), 22368–22373. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3214067
605
PwC (2025). Megatrends. Available online at: https://www.pwc.nl/en/topics/economic-office/megatrends.html.
606
Qader B. Hussain I. Baron M. Estevez-Brito R. Cassella J. P. Gonzalez-Rodriguez J. (2022). The production and evaluation of an electrochemical sensors for strychnine and its main metabolite strychnine N-oxide for their use in biological samples. MOLECULES27 (6), 1826. 10.3390/molecules27061826
607
Qin P. Yang H. H. Zhao X. X. Qu W. J. Yao H. Wei T. B. et al (2022b). A supramolecular polymer network constructed by pillar[5]arene-based host-guest interactions and its application in nitro explosive detection. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem.102 (3–4), 295–302. 10.1007/s10847-021-01118-x
608
Qin Y. Mo F. Yao S. Wu Y. He Y. Yao W. (2022a). Facile synthesis of porous Ag crystals as SERS sensor for detection of five methamphetamine analogs. Molecules27 (12), 3939. 10.3390/molecules27123939
609
Qin Y. D. Bubiajiaer H. Yao J. Zhang M. W. (2022c). Based on unmodified aptamer-gold nanoparticles colorimetric detection of dexamethasone in food. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (4), 242. 10.3390/bios12040242
610
Qiu J. J. Ke D. M. Lin H. C. Yu Y. L. Zheng Q. H. Li H. et al (2023). Fabrication of high sensitivity 2-PEA sensor based on Aldehyde-functionalized mesoporous carbon. Chin. Chem. Lett.34 (1), 107391. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.114
611
Qiu Y. Wen Z. Q. Mei S. L. Wei J. X. Chen Y. Y. Hu Z. et al (2021). Cation crosslinking-induced stable copper nanoclusters powder as latent fingerprints marker. NANOMATERIALS11 (12), 3371. 10.3390/nano11123371
612
Qiu Y. Yu S. Li L. (2022). Research progress in fluorescent probes for arsenic species. Molecules27 (23), 8497. 10.3390/molecules27238497
613
Rahman A. Khaleque A. Ali Y. Rahman T. (2020). THz spectroscopic sensing of liquid chemicals using a photonic crystal fiber. OSA Contin.3 (11), 2982–2996. 10.1364/osac.403854
614
Rajan R. Zakaria Y. Shamsuddin S. Hassan N. F. N. (2020). Robust synthesis of mono-dispersed spherical silica nanoparticle from rice husk for high definition latent fingermark development. ARABIAN J. Chem.13 (11), 8119–8132. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.042
615
Rajput P. Shishodia M. S. (2020). Förster resonance energy transfer and molecular fluorescence near gain assisted refractory nitrides based plasmonic core-shell nanoparticle. Plasmonics15 (6), 2081–2093. 10.1007/s11468-020-01208-5
616
Ran C. H. Xu Z. Z. He J. P. Man Z. W. Lv Z. Wang P. et al (2022). Starch-based near-infrared organic fluorophores for the imaging of latent fingerprints. J. Mater Chem. C Mater10 (43), 16347–16352. 10.1039/d2tc03532d
617
Ranbir S. G. Singh H. Kaur N. Singh N. (2023). Azodye-based colorimetric sensor array for identification of biogenic amines: food forensics by portable RGB-based signal readout. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL387, 133794. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133794
618
Rary E. Anderson S. M. Philbrick B. D. Suresh T. Burton J. (2020). Smart sanitation-biosensors as a public health tool in sanitation infrastructure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17 (14), 5146. 10.3390/ijerph17145146
619
Rasheed T. Nabeel F. Rizwan K. Bilal M. Hussain T. Shehzad S. A. (2020). Conjugated supramolecular architectures as state-of-the-art materials in detection and remedial measures of nitro based compounds: a review. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.129, 115958. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115958
620
Rasin P. Prabhakaran P. Basheer S. M. Manakkadan V. Palakkeezhill V. N. V. Sreekanth A. (2023). Pilot study on the visualization of latent fingerprints and naked eye detection of Hg2+and Zn2+Ions in aqueous media using ninhydrin-based thiosemicarbazone. Anal. Chem.95 (15), 6448–6457. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00579
621
Ravindra M. K. Darshan G. P. Lavanya D. R. Mahadevan K. M. Premkumar H. B. Sharma S. C. et al (2021). Aggregation induced emission based active conjugated imidazole luminogens for visualization of latent fingerprints and multiple anticounterfeiting applications. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 16748. 10.1038/s41598-021-96011-5
622
Raza A. Biswas A. Zehra A. Mengesha A. (2020). Multiple tier detection of TNT using curcumin functionalized silver nanoparticles. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.001
623
Razlansari M. Ulucan-Karnak F. Kahrizi M. Mirinejad S. Sargazi S. Mishra S. et al (2022). Nanobiosensors for detection of opioids: a review of latest advancements. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.179, 79–94. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.08.017
624
Rebelo P. Pacheco J. G. Voroshylova I. V. Melo A. Cordeiro M. Delerue-Matos C. (2021). Rational development of molecular imprinted carbon paste electrode for Furazolidone detection: theoretical and experimental approach. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL329, 129112. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129112
625
Reese T. Suarez C. Premasiri W. R. Shaine M. L. Ingraham H. Brodeur A. N. et al (2021). Surface enhanced Raman scattering specificity for detection and identification of dried bloodstains. Forensic Sci. Int.328, 111000. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111000
626
Regula Forensics (2025). How to tell if money is fake: detect counterfeit money. Available online at: https://regulaforensics.com/blog/detect-counterfeit-money/.
627
Ren J. Mao S. J. Lin J. D. Xu Y. Zhu Q. Q. Xu N. (2022). Research progress of Raman spectroscopy and Raman imaging in pharmaceutical analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des.28 (18), 1445–1456. 10.2174/1381612828666220518145635
628
Ren S. F. Zeng J. L. Zheng Z. X. Shi H. Q. (2021). Perspective and application of modified electrode material technology in electrochemical voltammetric sensors for analysis and detection of illicit drugs. SENSORS ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL329, 112821. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.112821
629
Renuka L. Anantharaju K. S. Gurushantha K. Nagabhushana H. Vidya Y. S. Suresh C. et al (2021). Phase-transformation synthesis of Li codoped ZrO2: Eu3+ nanomaterials: characterization, photocatalytic, luminescent behaviour and latent fingerprint development. Ceram. Int.47 (7), 10332–10345. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.152
630
Ribeiro M. F. M. Bento F. Ipólito A. J. Oliveira M. F. de (2020). Development of a pencil drawn paper-based analytical device to detect lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). J. Forensic Sci.65 (6), 2121–2128. 10.1111/1556-4029.14494
631
Ricci P. P. Gregory O. J. (2020). Continuous monitoring of TATP using ultrasensitive, low-power sensors. IEEE Sens. J.20 (23), 14058–14064. 10.1109/jsen.2020.3008254
632
Ricci P. P. Gregory O. J. (2021). Free-standing, thin-film sensors for the trace detection of explosives. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 6623–6710. 10.1038/s41598-021-86077-6
633
Rocha D. S. Duarte L. C. Silva-Neto H. A. Chagas C. L. S. Santana M. H. P. Antoniosi N. R. et al (2021a). Sandpaper-based electrochemical devices assembled on a reusable 3D-printed holder to detect date rape drug in beverages. Talanta232, 122408. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122408
634
Rocha R. G. Ribeiro J. S. Santana M. H. P. Richter E. M. Muñoz R. A. A. (2021b). 3D-printing for forensic chemistry: voltammetric determination of cocaine on additively manufactured graphene–polylactic acid electrodes. Anal. Methods13 (15), 1788–1794. 10.1039/d1ay00181g
635
Rocha R. G. Silva W. P. Sousa R. M. F. Junior M. C. Santana M. H. P. Munoz R. A. A. et al (2020). Investigation of midazolam electro-oxidation on boron doped diamond electrode by voltammetric techniques and density functional theory calculations: application in beverage samples. Talanta207, 120319. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120319
636
Rocher J. Aldegheishem A. Alrajeh N. Lloret J. (2022). Develop an optical sensor to detect pollution incidents in sewerage. IEEE Sens. J.22 (24), 24449–24457. 10.1109/jsen.2022.3219931
637
Rocher J. Parra M. Parra L. Sendra S. Lloret J. Mengual J. (2021). “A low-cost sensor for detecting illicit discharge in sewerage,”. J sens. Editor MichelC., 2021. 10.1155/2021/6650157
638
Ross G. M. S. Zhao Y. Bosman A. J. Geballa-Koukoula A. Zhou H. Elliott C. T. et al (2023). Best practices and current implementation of emerging smartphone-based (bio)sensors- Part 1: data handling and ethics. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.158, 116863. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116863
639
Roushani M. Ghanbarzadeh M. Shahdost-Fard F. (2021). Fabrication of an electrochemical biodevice for ractopamine detection under a strategy of a double recognition of the aptamer/molecular imprinting polymer. BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY138, 107722. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107722
640
Ruchala I. Battisti U. M. Nguyen V. T. Chen R. Y. T. Glennon R. A. Eltit J. M. (2021). Functional characterization of N-octyl 4-methylamphetamine variants and related bivalent compounds at the dopamine and serotonin transporters using Ca2+ channels as sensors. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.419, 115513. 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115513
641
Rui H. Ting Y. Yan M. Y. (2023). Advances in the application of novel carbon nanomaterials in illicit drug detection. NEW J. Chem.47 (5), 2161–2172. 10.1039/d2nj04816g
642
Ryu J. Kim Y. (2022). Overcoming interferences in the colorimetric and fluorimetric detection of γ-hydroxybutyrate in spiked beverages. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL364, 131861. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131861
643
Sachdeva D. Singh A. Agrawal V. V. (2021). Electrochemical detection of anti-anxiety drug clonazepam using electrophoretically deposited gold nanoparticles. MAPAN-JOURNAL METROLOGY Soc. INDIA36 (3), 639–649. 10.1007/s12647-021-00484-8
644
Sadeghi M. Jahanshahi M. Javadian H. (2020). Highly sensitive biosensor for detection of DNA nucleobases: enhanced electrochemical sensing based on polyaniline/single-layer MoS2 nanosheets nanocomposite modified carbon paste electrode. Microchem. J.152, 104315. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104315
645
Saha A. Kurrey R. Verma S. K. Deb M. K. (2022). Cationic polystyrene resin bound silver nanocomposites assisted fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for enhanced catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol in aqueous medium. Chem. East.4 (4), 1757–1774. 10.3390/chemistry4040114
646
Saichanapan J. Promsuwan K. Limbut W. (2020). Adsorption and determination of sibutramine in illegal slimming product using porous graphene ink-modified electrode. Talanta212, 120788. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120788
647
Saisahas K. Soleh A. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. Phonchai A. Sadiq N. S. M. et al (2022a). Nanocoral-like polyaniline-modified graphene-based electrochemical paper-based analytical device for a portable electrochemical sensor for xylazine detection. ACS Omega7 (15), 13913–13924. 10.1021/acsomega.2c00295
648
Saisahas K. Soleh A. Somsiri S. Senglan P. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. et al (2022b). Electrochemical sensor for methamphetamine detection using laser-induced porous graphene electrode. Nanomaterials12 (1), 73. 10.3390/nano12010073
649
Sanguarnsak C. Promsuwan K. Saichanapan J. Soleh A. Saisahas K. Phua C. H. et al (2022). Voltammetric amitriptyline determination using a metal-free electrode based on phosphorus-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Electrochem Soc.169 (1), 017510. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac48c4
650
Sanli S. Moulahoum H. Ghorbanizamani F. Gumus Z. P. Timur S. (2020). On-site testosterone biosensing for doping detection: electrochemical immunosensing via functionalized magnetic nanoparticles and screen-printed electrodes. ChemistrySelect5 (47), 14911–14916. 10.1002/slct.202004204
651
Santana E. R. Martins E. C. Spinelli A. (2021). Electrode modified with nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots supported in chitosan for triclocarban monitoring. Microchem. J.167, 106297. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106297
652
Santillo M. F. (2020). Trends using biological target-based assays for drug detection in complex sample matrices. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (17), 3975–3982. 10.1007/s00216-020-02681-x
653
Santoro R. Caccia M. Ampilogov N. Malinverno L. Allwork C. Ellis M. et al (2020). Qualification of a compact neutron detector based on SiPM. J. Instrum.15 (5), C05053. 10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/c05053
654
Santos A. Deokaran G. O. Costa C. V. Gama L. Mazzini E. G. de Assis A. M. L. et al (2021). A “turn-off” fluorescent sensor based on electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers and fluorene(bisthiophene) derivative for nitroaromatic explosive detection. Forensic Sci. Int.329, 111056. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111056
655
Schmidt V. M. Zelger P. Wöss C. Huck C. W. Arora R. Bechtel E. et al (2022). Post-Mortem interval of human skeletal remains estimated with handheld NIR spectrometry. BIOLOGY-BASEL11 (7), 1020. 10.3390/biology11071020
656
Schram J. Parrilla M. Slosse A. Van Durme F. Aberg J. Bjork K. et al (2022). Paraformaldehyde-coated electrochemical sensor for improved on-site detection of amphetamine in street samples. Microchem. J.179, 107518. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107518
657
Scorsone E. Manai R. Cali K. Ricatti M. J. Farno S. Persaud K. et al (2021). Biosensor array based on ligand binding proteins for narcotics and explosives detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem.334, 129587. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129587
658
Sekar A. Vadivel R. Munuswamy R. G. Yadav R. (2021). Fluorescence spotting of latent sweat fingerprints with zinc oxide carbon dots embedded in a silica gel nanopowder: a green approach. NEW J. Chem.45 (37), 17447–17460. 10.1039/d1nj03901f
659
Senesi G. S. Harmon R. S. Hark R. R. (2021). Field-portable and handheld laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: historical review, current status and future prospects. Spectrochim. Acta Part B A. T. Spectrosc.175, 106013. 10.1016/j.sab.2020.106013
660
Senra M. V. X. Fonseca A. L. (2021). New tyrosinases with putative action against contaminants of emerging concern. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma.89 (9), 1180–1192. 10.1002/prot.26139
661
Sfragano P. S. Laschi S. Palchetti I. (2020). Sustainable printed electrochemical platforms for greener analytics. Front. Chem.8, 644. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00644
662
Sha O. Liu H. Ye M. Q. Zhu Y. Q. Yao J. W. Li Z. M. et al (2021). Solvent-free mechanochemical preparation of graphene oxide-Fe3O4 and its application in magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction of illegal dyes in food samples. J. Sep. Sci.44 (11), 2290–2300. 10.1002/jssc.202001084
663
Sha X. Y. Han S. Zhao H. Li N. Zhang C. Hasi W. L. J. (2020). A rapid detection method for on-site screening of estazolam in beverages with Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles paper-based SERS substrate. Anal. Sci.36 (6), 667–671. 10.2116/analsci.19p361
664
Shabashini A. Panja S. K. Nandi G. C. (2021). Applications of carbon dots (CDs) in latent fingerprints imaging. Chem. Asian J.16 (9), 1057–1072. 10.1002/asia.202100119
665
Shah S. N. A. Gul E. Hayat F. Rehman Z. Khan M. (2023). Advancement and perspectives of sulfite-based chemiluminescence, its mechanism, and sensing. CHEMOSENSORS11 (4), 212. 10.3390/chemosensors11040212
666
Shahbazi S. Becker T. Jia G. H. Lewis S. W. (2022). Luminescent nanostructures for the detection of latent fingermarks: a review. WILEY Interdiscip. Rev. FORENSIC Sci.4 (2). 10.1002/wfs2.1440
667
Shahbazi S. Boseley R. Grant B. Chen D. C. Becker T. Adegoke O. et al (2020). Luminescence detection of latent fingermarks on non -porous surfaces with heavy -metal -free quantum dots. FORENSIC Chem.18, 100222. 10.1016/j.forc.2020.100222
668
Shalini Devi K. S. Anantharamakrishnan A. Maheswari Krishnan U. (2021). Expanding horizons of metal oxide-based chemical and electrochemical sensors. Electroanalysis33 (9), 1979–1996. 10.1002/elan.202100087
669
Shamseer L. Moher D. Clarke M. Ghersi D. Liberati A. Petticrew M. et al (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ349, g7647. 10.1136/bmj.g7647
670
Shao Y. L. Duan J. Q. Wang M. Cao J. She Y. X. Cao Z. et al (2023). Application of molecularly imprinted electrochemical biomimetic sensors for detecting small molecule food contaminants. Polym. (Basel)15 (1), 187. 10.3390/polym15010187
671
Sharma V. Choudhary S. Mankotia P. Kumari A. Sharma K. Sehgal R. et al (2021). Nanoparticles as fingermark sensors. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.143, 116378. 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116378
672
Shi B. Q. Catsamas S. Kolotelo P. Wang M. Lintern A. Jovanovic D. et al (2021). A low-cost water depth and electrical conductivity sensor for detecting inputs into urban stormwater networks. SENSORS21 (9), 3056. 10.3390/s21093056
673
Shin J. Song Y. G. Jung S. J. Yoon T. Kim G. S. Kim J. H. et al (2020). Smart forensic kit: real-time estimation of postmortem interval using a highly sensitive gas sensor for microbial forensics. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL322, 128612. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128612
674
Shishkanova T. V. Trchová M. Sinica A. Fitl P. Matejka P. (2021). Electrochemical sensor for phenylpropanolamine based on oligomer derived from 3-hydroxybenzoic acid with dibenzo-18-crown-6. J. Electroanal. Chem., 882. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114963
675
Shishkanova T. V. Vatrsková L. Spálovská D. Králík F. Curínová P. Winkler M. et al (2020). Complexation of cathinones by 4-tert-butylcalix[4]arene tetra-acetate as a possible technique for forensic analysis. Forensic Toxicol.38 (1), 70–78. 10.1007/s11419-019-00489-8
676
Shkembi X. Botero M. L. Skouridou V. Jauset-Rubio M. Svobodova M. Ballester P. et al (2022). Novel nandrolone aptamer for rapid colorimetric detection of anabolic steroids. Anal. Biochem.658, 114937. 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114937
677
Shrivastava P. Jain S. K. Kumar N. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021a). Handheld device for rapid detection of lead (Pb2+) in gunshot residue for forensic application. Microchem. J.165, 106186. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106186
678
Shrivastava P. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021c). Gunshot residue detection technologies—a review. Egypt. J. Forensic Sci.11 (1), 11–21. 10.1186/s41935-021-00223-9
679
Shrivastava P. Singh B. P. Jain S. K. Jain V. K. Nagpal S. (2021b). A novel approach to detect barium in gunshot residue using a handheld device: a forensic application. Anal. Methods13 (38), 4379–4389. 10.1039/d1ay01272j
680
Silva T. G. da Paixao T. (2022). Development and evaluation of two different electronic tongues aiming to the discrimination of cutting agents found in cocaine seized samples. Braz. J. Anal. Chem.9 (34), 188–197. 10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.AR-59-2021
681
Silva W. P. Rocha R. G. Arantes L. C. Lima C. D. Melo L. M. A. Munoz R. A. A. et al (2021). Development of a simple and rapid screening method for the detection of 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine in forensic samples. Talanta233, 122597. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122597
682
Singh A. P. Balayan S. Gupta S. Jain U. Sarin R. K. Chauhan N. (2021). Detection of pesticide residues utilizing enzyme-electrode interface via nano-patterning of TiO2 nanoparticles and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. PROCESS Biochem.108, 185–193. 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.06.015
683
Singh A. P. Balayan S. Hooda V. Sarin R. K. Chauhan N. (2020). Nano-interface driven electrochemical sensor for pesticides detection based on the acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibition. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.164, 3943–3952. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.215
684
Singh H. Kour S. Selvaraj M. (2022a). Magnetically separable template assisted iron nanoparticle for the enhancement of latent fingerprints. J. INDIAN Chem. Soc.99 (9), 100661. 10.1016/j.jics.2022.100661
685
Singh N. K. Sidhu G. K. Gupta K. (2022b). Current and future perspective of devices and diagnostics for opioid and OIRD. Biomedicines10 (4), 743. 10.3390/biomedicines10040743
686
Singh V. Kamthania M. C. Mishra N. Singh S. (2014). Biosensor developments: application in crime detection. Int. J. Eng. Tech. Res. (special issue), 163.
687
Smith M. Logan M. Bazley M. Blanchfield J. Stokes R. Blanco A. et al (2021). A Semi-quantitative method for the detection of fentanyl using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with a handheld Raman instrument. J. Forensic Sci.66 (2), 505–519. 10.1111/1556-4029.14610
688
Smith V. Devane D. Begley C. M. Clarke M. (2011). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.11 (1), 15. 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15
689
Soanes C. Stevenson A. (2008). Concise oxford English dictionary. 6th ed.Oxford University Press. Available online at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/concise-oxford-english-dictionary/oclc/226280329?page=citation.
690
Sohouli E. Ghalkhani M. Rostami M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi M. Ahmadi F. (2020). A noble electrochemical sensor based on TiO2@CuO-N-rGO and poly (L-cysteine) nanocomposite applicable for trace analysis of flunitrazepam. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-MATERIALS Biol. Appl.117, 111300. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111300
691
Soliman S. S. Mahmoud A. M. Elghobashy M. R. Zaazaa H. E. Sedik G. A. (2023). Point-of-care electrochemical sensor for selective determination of date rape drug “ketamine” based on core-shell molecularly imprinted polymer. Talanta.254, 124151. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124151
692
Solin K. Vuoriluoto M. Khakalo A. Tammelin T. (2023). Cannabis detection with solid sensors and paper-based immunoassays by conjugating antibodies to nanocellulose. Carbohydr. Polym.304, 120517. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120517
693
Son S. U. Jang S. Kang B. Kim J. Lim J. Seo S. et al (2021). Colorimetric paper sensor for visual detection of date-rape drug γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL347, 130598. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130598
694
Soni S. Jain U. Burke D. H. Chauhan N. (2022a). Development of nanomaterial-modified impedimetric aptasensor—a single-step strategy for 3,4-methylenedioxymethylamphetamine detection. Biosens. (Basel).12 (7), 538. 10.3390/bios12070538
695
Soni S. Jain U. Burke D. H. Chauhan N. (2022b). Recent trends and emerging strategies for aptasensing technologies for illicit drugs detection. J. Electroanal. Chem.910, 116128. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116128
696
Soni S. Jain U. Chauhan N. (2021). A systematic review on sensing techniques for drug-facilitated sexual assaults (DFSA) monitoring. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.49 (11), 83–92. 10.1016/j.cjac.2021.09.001
697
Sposito H. G. M. Lobato A. Tasic N. O. Maldaner A. O. Paixao T. Goncalves L. M. (2022). Swift electrochemical sensing of diltiazem employing highly-selective molecularly-imprinted 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid. J. Electroanal. Chem.911, 116207. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116207
698
Srivastava B. B. Gupta S. K. Mao Y. B. (2020). Single red emission from upconverting ZnGa2O4:Yb,Er nanoparticles co-doped by Cr3+. J. Mater Chem. C Mater8 (19), 6370–6379. 10.1039/d0tc00411a
699
Su H. Li S. Jin Y. Xian Z. Yang D. Zhou W. et al (2017). Nanomaterial-based biosensors for biological detections. Adv. Health Care Technol.3, 19–29. 10.2147/ahct.s94025
700
Su L. J. (2022). Overview on the sensors for direct electrochemical detection of illicit drugs in sports. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.17 (12), 221260. 10.20964/2022.12.64
701
Su X. M. Liu X. Y. Xie Y. C. Z. Chen M. Y. Zhong H. Li M. (2023). Quantitative label-free SERS detection of trace fentanyl in biofluids with a freestanding hydrophobic plasmonic paper biosensor. Anal. Chem.95, 3821–3829. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05211
702
Su Z. Li Y. Li J. Dou X. (2021). Ultrasensitive luminescent turn-on detection of perchlorate particulates by triggering supramolecular self-assembly of platinum(II) complex in hydrogel matrix. Sens. Actuators B Chem.336, 129728. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129728
703
Su Z. Li Y. S. Li J. G. Li K. Dou X. C. (2022). Ultrasensitive dual-mode visualization of perchlorate in water, soil and air boosted by close and stable Pt-Pt packing endowed low-energy absorption and emission. J. Mater Chem. A Mater10 (15), 8195–8207. 10.1039/d2ta00843b
704
Suarez C. Premasiri W. R. Ingraham H. Brodeur A. N. Ziegler L. D. (2023). Ultra-sensitive, rapid detection of dried bloodstains by surface enhanced Raman scattering on Ag substrates. Talanta259, 124535. 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124535
705
Suhasini R. Karpagam R. Thirumoorthy K. Thiagarajan V. (2021). “Turn-on” unsymmetrical azine based fluorophore for the selective detection of diethylchlorophosphate via photoinduced electron transfer to intramolecular charge transfer pathway. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.263, 120206. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120206
706
Suherman K. D. C. Morita K. Kawaguchi T. (2020). Surface plasmon resonance signal amplification using secondary antibody interaction for illegal compound detection. Key Eng. Mater845, 103–108. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.845.103
707
Sun R. M. Lv R. J. Li Y. H. Du T. Chen L. X. Zhang Y. et al (2023). Simple and sensitive electrochemical detection of sunset yellow and Sudan I in food based on AuNPs/Zr-MOF-Graphene. Food control.145, 109491. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109491
708
Sun Y. Y. Li W. Zhao L. Q. Li F. Y. Xie Y. F. Yao W. R. et al (2021). Simultaneous SERS detection of illegal food additives rhodamine B and basic orange II based on Au nanorod-incorporated melamine foam. Food Chem.357, 129741. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129741
709
Sundhoro M. Agnihotra S. R. Khan N. D. Barnes A. BelBruno J. Mendecki L. (2021). Rapid and accurate electrochemical sensor for food allergen detection in complex foods. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 20831. 10.1038/s41598-021-00241-6
710
Suresh C. Darshan G. P. Sharma S. C. Venkataravanappa M. Premkumar H. B. Shanthi S. et al (2020). Imaging sweat pore structures in latent fingerprints and unclonable anti-counterfeiting patterns by sensitizers blended LaOF: Pr3+ nanophosphors. Opt. Mater (Amst).100, 109625. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109625
711
Suryoprabowo S. Liu L. Q. Kuang H. Cui G. Xu C. L. (2021). Fluorescence based immunochromatographic sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of tadalafil and comparison with a gold lateral flow immunoassay. Food Chem.342, 128255. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128255
712
Suslick K. S. Rakow N. A. Sen A. (2004). Colorimetric sensor arrays for molecular recognition. Tetrahedron60 (49), 11133–11138. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.09.007
713
Swathi B. N. Krushna B. R. R. Prasad B. D. Sharma S. C. Subramanian B. Nagabhushana H. (2023). Unclonable fluorescence of MgO-ZrO2:Tb3+ nanocomposite for versatile applications in data security, dermatoglyphics. LUMINESCENCE.38 (3), 232–249. 10.1002/bio.4440
714
Symonsbergen D. J. Kangas M. J. Perez M. Holmes A. E. (2018). International Journal of Criminal and Forensic Science Evaluation of the NIK® test: primary general screening test for the presumptive identification of drugs.
715
Szczeszak A. Skwierczynska M. Przybylska D. Runowski M. Smiechowicz E. Erdman A. et al (2020). Upconversion luminescence in cellulose composites (fibres and paper) modified with lanthanide-doped SrF2 nanoparticles. J. Mater Chem. C Mater8 (34), 11922–11928. 10.1039/D0TC02050H
716
Takahashi F. Kazui Y. Miyaguchi H. Ohmori T. Tanaka R. Jin J. Y. (2021). Simple colorimetric screening of the nerve agent VX using gold nanoparticles and a hand-powered extraction device. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL327, 128902. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128902
717
Takahashi F. Nitta S. Shimizu R. Shoji T. Tatsumi H. Jin J. (2022). Sensitive screening of methamphetamine stimulant using potential-modulated electrochemiluminescence. Anal. Chim. Acta.1191, 339229. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339229
718
Tan R. Shen Y. Li D. N. Yang Y. Tu Y. F. (2022). The electrochemiluminescent immunosensors for point-of-care testing of methamphetamine using a portable meter. Electroanalysis34 (2), 423–431. 10.1002/elan.202060590
719
Tan X. P. Fan Y. M. Wang S. Wu Y. Shi W. B. Huang T. et al (2020). Ultrasensitive and highly selective electrochemical sensing of sodium picrate by Dihydroxylatopillar[6]arene-Modified gold nanoparticles and cationic Pillar[6]arene functionalized covalent organic framework. Electrochim Acta335, 135706. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135706
720
Tang C. He Z. Liu H. Xu Y. Huang H. Yang G. et al (2020). Application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection. J. Nanobiotechnology18, 62–19. 10.1186/s12951-020-00613-6
721
Tao X. Q. Peng Y. Y. Liu J. W. (2020). Nanomaterial-based fluorescent biosensors for veterinary drug detection in foods. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 575–594. 10.38212/2224-6614.1267
722
Tasangtong B. Henry C. S. Sameenoi Y. (2023). Diameter-based inkjet-printed paper devices for formaldehyde analysis in foods. Food control.145, 109408. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109408
723
Tay L. L. Hulse J. (2021). Methodology for binary detection analysis of inkjet-printed optical sensors for chemical detection. MRS Adv.6 (1), 1–5. 10.1557/s43580-021-00004-5
724
Teng X. Ding X. She Z. Li Y. Xiong X. (2023). Preparation of functionalized magnetic polystyrene microspheres and their application in food safety detection. Polym. (Basel)15 (1), 77. 10.3390/polym15010077
725
Testler (2025). Device type approval tests. Available online at: https://www.laboratuar.com/en/testler/tip-onay-testleri/cihaz-tip-onay-testleri/.
726
Teymourian H. Parrilla M. Sempionatto J. R. Montiel N. F. Barfidokht A. Van Echelpoel R. et al (2020). Wearable electrochemical sensors for the monitoring and screening of drugs. ACS Sens.5 (9), 2679–2700. 10.1021/acssensors.0c01318
727
Thakarda J. Agrawal B. Anil D. Jana A. Maity P. (2020). Detection of trace-level nitroaromatic explosives by 1-pyreneiodide-ligated luminescent gold nanostructures and their forensic applications. LANGMUIR36 (50), 15442–15449. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03117
728
Thermo Fisher Scientific (2024). Rapid DNA solutions for law enforcement. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Available online at: https://www.thermofisher.com/uk/en/home/industrial/forensics/human-identification/forensic-dna-analysis/dna-analysis/rapidhit-id-system-human-identification/rapidhit-id-system-law-enforcement.html.
729
Thermo Scientific (2024). Product specifications Thermo scientific TruDefender FT and TruDefender FTi handheld FTIR for unknown chemical and explosives identification. Available online at: www.thermoscientific.com/safety-chemid.
730
Thipwimonmas Y. Jaidam J. Samoson K. Khunseeraksa V. Phonchai A. Thiangchanya A. et al (2021). A simple and rapid spectrophotometric method for nitrite detection in small sample volumes. CHEMOSENSORS9 (7), 161. 10.3390/chemosensors9070161
731
Thomas J. Brunton J. Graziosi S. (2010). EPPI-reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. EPPI-centre software: London: social science research unit. London, United Kingdom: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
732
Tiedge T. M. McAtee P. D. McCormick M. N. Lakhtakia A. Roy R. (2020). Massively parallel sequencing and STR analysis from partial bloody fingerprints enhanced with columnar thin films. FORENSIC Sci. INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS49, 102369. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102369
733
Tomar A. Gupta R. R. Mehta S. K. Sharma S. (2023). An overview of security materials in banknotes and analytical techniques in detecting counterfeits. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem.54, 2865–2878. 10.1080/10408347.2023.2209185
734
Torrarit K. Kongkaew S. Samoson K. Kanatharana P. Thavarungkul P. Chang K. H. et al (2022). Flow injection amperometric measurement of formalin in seafood. ACS Omega7 (21), 17679–17691. 10.1021/acsomega.2c00515
735
Tortajada-Genaro L. A. Lucío M. I. Maquieira A. (2022). Fast DNA biosensing based on isothermal amplification, unmodified gold nanoparticles, and smartphone detection. Food control.137, 108943. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108943
736
Trabelsi H. Akl M. Akl S. H. (2021). Ultrasound assisted Eu3+–doped strontium titanate nanophosphors: labeling agent useful for visualization of latent fingerprints. Powder Technol.384, 70–81. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.006
737
TRUSCANRM (2025). Handheld Raman analyzer. Available online at: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/TRUSCANRM.
738
Truta F. Florea A. Cernat A. Tertis M. Hosu O. de Wael K. et al (2020). Tackling the problem of sensing commonly abused drugs through nanomaterials and (Bio)Recognition approaches. Front. Chem.8, 561638. 10.3389/fchem.2020.561638
739
Tuccitto N. Riela L. Zammataro A. Spitaleri L. Li-Destri G. Sfuncia G. et al (2020c). Functionalized carbon nanoparticle-based sensors for chemical warfare agents. ACS Appl. Nano Mater3 (8), 8182–8191. 10.1021/acsanm.0c01593
740
Tuccitto N. Spitaleri L. Gulino A. Li Destri G. Pappalardo A. Sfrazzetto G. T. (2020b). The state of the art in biodefense related bacterial pathogen detection using bacteriophages: how it started and how it’s going. Viruses12 (12), 1393. 10.3390/v12121393
741
Tuccitto N. Spitaleri L. Gulino A. Li Destri G. Sfrazzetto G. T. Trusso Sfrazzetto G. (2020a). Supramolecular sensing of a chemical warfare agents simulant by functionalized carbon nanoparticles. Molecules25 (23), 5731. 10.3390/molecules25235731
742
Tyree D. J. Brothers M. C. Sim D. Flory L. Tomb M. Strayer K. et al (2023). Detection of asthma inhaler use via terahertz spectroscopy. ACS Sens.8, 610–618. 10.1021/acssensors.2c01795
743
United Nations (2023). World drug report. New York, United States: United Nations.
744
United Nations (2025). Sustainable development goals. New York, United States: United Nations. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/.
745
Upadhyay H. Harikrishnan U. Bhatt D. Dhadnekar N. Kumar K. Panchal M. (2022). Calixarene: the dawn of a new era in forensic chemistry. Curr. Org. Chem.26 (22), 2005–2015. 10.2174/1385272827666230118094847
746
Urbanová V. Pumera M. (2020). Uranium detection by 3D-printed titanium structures: towards decentralized nuclear forensic applications. Appl. Mater Today21, 100881. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100881
747
Uttpal A. Singh C. A. K. Patrik O. Amarnath M. Ondrej K. Raval I. H. et al (2022). Recent advances in the potential applications of luminescence-based, SPR-based, and carbon-based biosensors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.106 (8), 2827–2853. 10.1007/s00253-022-11901-6
748
Vadivel R. Nirmala M. Anbukumaran K. (2021). Commonly available, everyday materials as non-conventional powders for the visualization of latent fingerprints. FORENSIC Chem.24, 100339. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100339
749
van Damme I. M. Mestres-Fitó P. Ramaker H. J. Hulsbergen A. W. C. Heijden AEDM van der Kranenburg R. F. et al (2023). Rapid and on-scene chemical identification of intact explosives with portable near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis. Sensors23 (8), 3804. 10.3390/s23083804
750
Van Echelpoel R. Kranenburg R. F. van Asten A. C. De Wael K. (2022). Electrochemical detection of MDMA and 2C-B in ecstasy tablets using a selectivity enhancement strategy by in-situ derivatization. FORENSIC Chem.27, 100383. 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100383
751
Van Echelpoel R. Parrilla M. Sleegers N. Shanmugam S. T. van Nuijs A. L. N. Slosse A. et al (2023). Validated portable device for the qualitative and quantitative electrochemical detection of MDMA ready for on-site use. Microchem. J.190, 108693. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108693
752
Vargas A. F. L. Buitrago W. G. Q. Silva D. C. C. Suarez J. F. M. (2022). Voltammetric responses of a CYP2D6-based biosensor to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and the synthetic cathinone α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (α-PVP). ChemistrySelect7 (42). 10.1002/slct.202202748
753
Vendamani V. S. Beeram R. Rao S. Rao S. V. (2023). Protocol for designing AuNP-capped Ag dendrites as surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensors for trace molecular detection. Star. Protoc.4 (1), 102068. 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102068
754
Verbitskiy E. V. Rusinov G. L. Chupakhin O. N. Charushin V. N. (2020). Design of fluorescent sensors based on azaheterocyclic push-pull systems towards nitroaromatic explosives and related compounds: a review. DYES PIGMENTS180, 108414. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108414
755
Verhagen A. Kelarakis A. (2020). Carbon dots for forensic applications: a critical review. NANOMATERIALS10 (8), 1535. 10.3390/nano10081535
756
Viola R. Liberatore N. Mengali S. Elmi I. Tamarri F. Zampolli S. (2023). Lightweight gas sensor based on MEMS pre-concentration and infrared absorption spectroscopy inside a hollow fiber. SENSORS23 (5), 2809. 10.3390/s23052809
757
Vuckovic N. Glodovic N. Radovanovic Z. Janackovic D. Milasinovic N. (2021). A novel chitosan/tripolyphosphate/L-lysine conjugates for latent fingerprints detection and enhancement. J. Forensic Sci.66 (1), 149–160. 10.1111/1556-4029.14569
758
Vunckx K. Geelen B. Garcia Munoz V. Lee W. Chang H. Van Dorpe P. et al (2020). Towards a miniaturized application-specific Raman spectrometer. (Bellingham, WA: SPIE (The International Society for Optics and Photonics)). 8.
759
Wahba M. E. K. Ayman A. Zeid A. M. El-Shabrawy Y. Draz M. E. (2023). Portable and green solid contact potentiometric sensor for the rapid and direct assay of clozapine in post-mortem rat liver and dosage forms: an analytical approach to forensic and pharmaceutical samples. Microchem. J.186, 108364. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108364
760
Wan J. W. Chen L. Li W. Cui S. F. Yuan B. F. (2022). Preparation of novel magnetic nanomaterials based on “facile coprecipitation” for developing latent fingerprints (LFP) in crime scenes. ACS Omega7 (2), 1712–1721. 10.1021/acsomega.1c04208
761
Wang B. Kang K. Ji X. Liu Y. Li X. Wang L. et al Multifunctional encapsulating gold nanoparticles into Cu-Hemin/Metal-Organic frameworks for catechol electrochemical detection on graphene-based electrode (2020c). ;15, 2050155, 10.1142/s179329202050155612).
762
Wang B. Xie K. Z. Lee K. H. (2021c). Veterinary drug residues in animal-derived foods: sample preparation and analytical methods. FOODS10 (3), 555. 10.3390/foods10030555
763
Wang C. Luo J. Dou H. Raise A. Ali M. S. Fan W. et al (2023b). Optimization and analytical behavior of a morphine electrochemical sensor in environmental and biological samples based on graphite rod electrode using graphene/Co3O4 nanocomposite. Chemosphere326, 138451. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138451
764
Wang C. D. Xu X. H. Qiu G. Y. Ye W. C. Li Y. M. Harris R. A. et al (2021e). Group-Targeting SERS screening of total benzodiazepines based on large-size (111) faceted silver nanosheets decorated with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Anal. Chem.93 (7), 3403–3410. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04399
765
Wang G. F. Cai Z. Z. Dou X. C. (2021a). Colorimetric logic design for rapid and precise discrimination of nitrate-based improvised explosives. Cell. Rep. Phys. Sci.2 (2), 100317. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100317
766
Wang J. Liu J. L. Wang M. Qiu Y. L. Kong J. M. Zhang X. J. (2021d). A host guest interaction enhanced polymerization amplification for electrochemical detection of cocaine. Anal. Chim. Acta.1184, 339041. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339041
767
Wang J. Xu H. Luo L. Li N. N. Qiao C. X. Wu J. F. et al (2023a). Rapid detection of whole active ricin using a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based sandwich immunoassay. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.54 (2), 137–149. 10.1002/jrs.6464
768
Wang J. J. Wu Y. Wu Q. H. Li L. Wang Y. Yang H. (2020f). Highly sensitive detection of melamine in milk samples based on N-methylmesoporphyrin IX/G-quadruplex structure. Microchem. J.155, 104751. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104751
769
Wang L. J. Zhou H. Hu H. X. Wang Q. Chen X. G. (2022c). Regulation mechanism of ssDNA aptamer in nanozymes and application of nanozyme-based aptasensors in food safety. FOODS11 (4), 544. 10.3390/foods11040544
770
Wang M. Shen D. P. Zhu Z. X. Ju J. S. Wu J. Zhu Y. et al (2020d). Dual-mode fluorescent development of latent fingerprints using NaYbF4:Tm upconversion nanomaterials. Mater Today Adv.8, 100113. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100113
771
Wang M. Wang C. M. Ma R. T. (2020a). Explosive detection and identification using X-ray fluorescence and thermal fingerprint of silica encapsulated nanoparticles. COLLOIDS SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL Eng. ASPECTS601, 125027. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125027
772
Wang N. Gao J. Enjing T. Yu W. Li H. Zhang J. et al (2022e). Rapid Russula senecis identification assays using loop-mediated isothermal amplification based on real-time fluorescence and visualization. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.106 (3), 1227–1239. 10.1007/s00253-022-11774-9
773
Wang S. Peng T. H. Li S. K. Wang L. L. Zhang L. Yin Z. W. et al (2022a). Natural interface-mediated self-assembly of graphene-isolated-nanocrystals for plasmonic arrays construction and personalized information acquisition. Nano Res.15 (10), 9327–9333. 10.1007/s12274-022-4602-1
774
Wang X. Liao T. Wang H. Y. Hao H. X. Yang Q. L. Zhou H. et al (2022b). Novel organic-inorganic hybrid polystyrene nanoparticles with trichromatic luminescence for the detection of latent fingerprints. Int. J. Anal. Chem.2022, 1–8. 10.1155/2022/2230360
775
Wang Y. Li Z. Lin H. Siddanakoppalu P. N. Zhou J. Chen G. et al (2019). Quantum-dot-based lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of crustacean major allergen tropomyosin. Food control.106, 106714. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106714
776
Wang Y. Teng X. Y. Cao J. Y. Fan Y. L. Liu X. L. Guo X. Y. et al (2022f). Detection of 3,4-methylene dioxy amphetamine in urine by magnetically improved surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensing strategy. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (9), 711. 10.3390/bios12090711
777
Wang Y. P. Ju W. Chen J. J. Liu Z. Y. Wang J. S. (2020e). One-Step synthesis of solid-state photoluminescent carbon nanodots from grains for latent fingerprint detection. ChemistrySelect5 (29), 8915–8923. 10.1002/slct.202000712
778
Wang Z. Hu S. Bao H. Xing K. Liu J. Xia J. et al (2021b). Immunochromatographic assay based on time-resolved fluorescent nanobeads for the rapid detection of sulfamethazine in egg, honey, and pork. J. Sci. Food Agric.101 (2), 684–692. 10.1002/jsfa.10681
779
Wang Z. Wu X. Liu L. Xu L. Kuang H. Xu C. (2020b). Rapid and sensitive detection of diclazuril in chicken samples using a gold nanoparticle-based lateral-flow strip. Food Chem.312, 126116. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126116
780
Wang Z. G. Chen R. P. Hou Y. Qin Y. K. Li S. Yang S. P. et al (2022d). DNA hydrogels combined with microfluidic chips for melamine detection. Anal. Chim. Acta.1228, 340312. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340312
781
Warning L. A. Miandashti A. R. McCarthy L. A. Zhang Q. F. Landes C. F. Link S. (2021). Nanophotonic approaches for chirality sensing. ACS Nano15 (10), 15538–15566. 10.1021/acsnano.1c04992
782
Weetall H. H. (1996). Biosensor technology what? Where? When? And why?Biosens. Bioelectron.11 (1–2), i–iv. 10.1016/0956-5663(96)83729-8
783
Wei S. Cui X. (2021). Synthesis of gold nanoparticles immobilized on fibrous nano‐silica for latent fingerprints detection. J. Porous Mater.28 (3), 751–762. 10.1007/s10934-020-01030-8
784
Wei S. C. Li Y. J. Liang H. H. Yen Y. T. Lin Y. H. Chang H. T. (2022). Photoluminescent carbon nanomaterials for sensing of illicit drugs: focus. Anal. Sci.38 (2), 247–260. 10.2116/analsci.21sar06
785
Wei W. X. Xi Z. Q. Huang Q. L. (2021). Fabrication of SERS-active Au@Au@Ag double shell nanoparticles for low-abundance pigment detection. Chin. J. Chem. Phys.34 (2), 197–202. 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2005062
786
Wen Z. H. Hu X. L. Yan R. F. Wang W. X. Meng H. Song Y. et al (2023). A reliable upconversion nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the highly sensitive determination of olaquindox in fish muscle and water samples. Food Chem.406, 135081. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135081
787
Wille S. M. R. Elliott S. (2021). The future of analytical and interpretative toxicology: where are we going and how do we get there?J. Anal. Toxicol.45 (7), 619–632. 10.1093/jat/bkaa133
788
Wu B. C. Castagnola E. Cui X. T. (2023). Zwitterionic polymer coated and aptamer functionalized flexible micro-electrode arrays for in vivo cocaine sensing and electrophysiology. Micromachines (Basel).14 (2), 323. 10.3390/mi14020323
789
Wu H. Gao Y. Yang J. Vai M. Du M. Pun S. (2021a). Development of a photoelectric adjustment system with extended range for fluorescence immunochromatographic assay strip readers. IEEE Photonics J.13 (3), 1–12. 10.1109/jphot.2021.3075900
790
Wu J. F. Chen P. P. Chen J. Ye X. X. Cao S. R. Sun C. Q. et al (2022a). Integrated ratiometric fluorescence probe-based acoustofluidic platform for visual detection of anthrax biomarker. Biosens. Bioelectron.214, 114538. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114538
791
Wu J. F. Zhu Y. J. Liu Y. L. Chen J. Guo L. Xie J. W. (2022b). A novel approach for on-site screening of organophosphorus nerve agents based on DTNB modified AgNPs using surface-enhanced Raman spectrometry. Anal. METHODS14 (43), 4292–4299. 10.1039/d2ay01307j
792
Wu K. H. Huang W. C. Chang S. C. Kao C. H. Shyu R. H. (2019). Colloidal silver-based lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of melamine in milk and animal feed. Mater Chem. Phys.231, 121–130. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.035
793
Wu K. H. Huang W. C. Shyu R. H. Chang S. C. (2020a). Silver nanoparticle-base lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of Staphylococcal enterotoxin B in milk and honey. J. Inorg. Biochem.210, 111163. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111163
794
Wu L. A. Chen Y. C. Pai W. C. Hsu Y. H. Chen Y. F. (2020d). “Plasmonic nanoparticles in agarose gel and filter paper-integrated microfluidic devices for SERS detection of molecules,” in Proc. SPIE 11257, plasmonics in biology and medicine XVII, 1, 1. 10.1117/12.2544360
795
Wu Q. Yao L. Qin P. Z. Xu J. G. Sun X. Yao B. B. et al (2021b). Time-resolved fluorescent lateral flow strip for easy and rapid quality control of edible oil. Food Chem.357, 129739. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129739
796
Wu Q. L. Ji C. Zhang L. L. Shi Q. L. Wu Y. G. Tao H. (2022d). A simple sensing platform based on a 1T@2H-MoS2/cMWCNTs composite modified electrode for ultrasensitive detection of illegal Sudan I dye in food samples. Anal. METHODS14 (5), 549–559. 10.1039/d1ay01775f
797
Wu T. Li J. X. Zheng S. Yu Q. Qi K. Z. Shao Y. et al (2022c). Magnetic nanotag-based colorimetric/SERS dual-readout immunochromatography for ultrasensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride and ractopamine in food samples. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (9), 709. 10.3390/bios12090709
798
Wu W. H. Sui S. H. Li J. Zong L. Li D. Xiao Y. H. et al (2020b). A fluorescent probe bearing two reactive groups discriminates between fluoride-containing G series and sulfur-containing V series nerve agents. ANALYST145 (16), 5425–5429. 10.1039/d0an00878h
799
Wu W. L. Yang S. Y. Liu J. L. Mi J. F. Dou L. N. Pan Y. T. et al (2020c). Progress in immunoassays for nitrofurans detection. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 907–926. 10.1080/09540105.2020.1786672
800
Wu Z. F. Zhou H. Han Q. J. Lin X. L. Han D. X. Li X. (2020e). A cost-effective fluorescence biosensor for cocaine based on a “mix-and-detect” strategy. ANALYST.145 (13), 4664–4670. 10.1039/d0an00675k
801
Xiao J. X. Wei N. N. Wu S. M. Li H. M. Yin X. Y. Si Y. et al (2022). The simultaneous detection of multiple antibiotics in milk and pork based on an antibody chip biosensor. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (8), 578. 10.3390/bios12080578
802
Xie H. Y. Chen C. R. Lie J. S. You R. Y. Qian W. Lin S. et al (2022c). Sensitive and selective detection of clenbuterol in meat samples by a graphene quantum dot fluorescent probe based on cationic-etherified starch. NANOMATERIALS12 (4), 691. 10.3390/nano12040691
803
Xie L. P. Zeng H. Zhu J. X. Zhang Z. L. Sun H. B. Xia W. et al (2022a). State of the art in flexible SERS sensors toward label-free and onsite detection: from design to applications. Nano Res.15 (5), 4374–4394. 10.1007/s12274-021-4017-4
804
Xie S. Z. Wang H. R. Li N. N. Liu Y. L. Wu J. F. Xu Y. N. et al (2022b). A gold coating nanoporous anodized alumina oxide membrane as the substrate for rapid surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of conjugated cyanide in fingertip blood. Microchem. J.183, 108107. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108107
805
Xie Y. Wu S. H. Chen Z. M. Jiang J. Z. Sun J. J. (2022d). Rapid nanomolar detection of methamphetamine in biofluids via a reagentless electrochemical aptamer-based biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta1207, 339742. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339742
806
Xie Z. P. Yang M. F. Luo L. Lv Y. P. Song K. J. Liu S. M. et al (2020). Nanochannel sensor for sensitive and selective adamantanamine detection based on host-guest competition. Talanta.219, 121213. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121213
807
Xiong J. C. Qin L. Q. Zhang H. X. Zhang S. He S. Xu Y. L. et al (2022a). Sensitive and simultaneous detection of ractopamine and salbutamol using multiplex lateral flow immunoassay based on polyethyleneimine-mediated SiO2@QDs nanocomposites: comparison and application. Microchem. J.181, 107730. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107730
808
Xiong J. C. Zhang H. X. Qin L. Q. Zhang S. Cao J. Y. Jiang H. Y. (2022b). Magnetic fluorescent quantum dots nanocomposites in food contaminants analysis: current challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (8), 4088. 10.3390/ijms23084088
809
Xiu L. Li N. Runhao Z. Penggang Y. Chenmeng Z. Yang N. et al (2021). Carbon-based SERS biosensor: from substrate design to sensing and bioapplication. NPG Asia Mater13 (1), 8. 10.1038/s41427-020-00278-5
810
Xu H. Zhang H. Wang C. Y. Chen K. Liu G. H. Tan C. X. et al (2021). A highly selective and sensitive “off-on” fluorescent probe for the detection of nerve agent mimic DCNP in solution and vapor phase. DYES PIGMENTS.186, 109007. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109007
811
Xu H. Zhang H. Zhao L. Peng C. Liu G. H. Cheng T. Y. (2020). A naphthalimide-based fluorescent probe for the highly sensitive and selective detection of nerve agent mimic DCP in solution and vapor phase. NEW J. Chem.44 (25), 10713–10718. 10.1039/d0nj00416b
812
Xu S. Zhang G. Fang B. Xiong Q. Duan H. Lai W. (2019). Lateral flow immunoassay based on polydopamine-coated gold nanoparticles for the sensitive detection of zearalenone in maize. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces11 (34), 31283–31290. 10.1021/acsami.9b08789
813
Xu X. Q. Wang W. Q. Lu L. Zhang J. Z. Luo J. (2022). Magnesium oxide nanotube as a promising material for detection of methamphetamine drug: theoretical study. J. Mol. Model.28 (6), 150. 10.1007/s00894-022-05151-6
814
Xue M. J. Wei X. Z. Feng W. Xing Z. F. Liu S. L. Song Q. H. (2021). Sensitive and selective detections of mustard gas and its analogues by 4-mercaptocoumarins as fluorescent chemosensors in both solutions and gas phase. J. Hazard Mater15, 416. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125789
815
Yan K. Wang L. C. Zhu Z. H. Duan S. Q. Hua Z. D. Xu P. et al (2023). Cucurbituril-protected dual-readout gold nanoclusters for sensitive fentanyl detection. ANALYST.148 (6), 1253–1258. 10.1039/d2an01748b
816
Yan Y. Zhang J. Yi S. Liu L. Huang C. (2021). Lighting up forensic science by aggregation-induced emission: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta1155, 238119. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.051
817
Yan Y. B. Jiang L. Zhang S. Shen X. T. Huang C. X. (2022). Specific “light-up” sensor made easy: an aggregation induced emission monomer for molecular imprinting. Biosens. Bioelectron.205, 114113. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114113
818
Yáñez-Sedeño P. Agüí L. Campuzano S. Pingarrón J. M. (2019). What electrochemical biosensors can do for forensic science? Unique features and applications. Biosens. (Basel).9 (4), 127. 10.3390/bios9040127
819
Yang F. W. Wang C. Yu H. Guo Y. H. Cheng Y. L. Yao W. R. et al (2022b). Establishment of the thin-layer chromatography-surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics method for simultaneous identification of eleven illegal drugs in anti-rheumatic health food. Food Biosci.49, 101842. 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101842
820
Yang G. Zhang J. Gu L. Tang Y. Zhang X. Huang X. et al (2023a). Ratiometric fluorescence immunoassay based on carbon quantum dots for sensitive detection of malachite green in fish. Biosens. (Basel).13 (1), 38. 10.3390/bios13010038
821
Yang H. Gun X. Y. Pang G. H. Zheng Z. X. Li C. B. Yang C. et al (2021b). Femtosecond laser patterned superhydrophobic/hydrophobic SERS sensors for rapid positioning ultratrace detection. Opt. Express29 (11), 16904–16913. 10.1364/oe.423789
822
Yang H. W. Lu F. N. Zhan X. X. Tian M. C. Yuan Z. Q. Lu C. (2020b). A Eu3+ - inspired fluorescent carbon nanodot probe for the sensitive visualization of anthrax biomarker by integrating EDTA chelation. Talanta208, 120368. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120368
823
Yang J. He D. T. Zhang N. Hu C. G. (2022d). Disposable carbon nanotube-based antifouling electrochemical sensors for detection of morphine in unprocessed coffee and milk. J. Electroanal. Chem.905, 115997. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115997
824
Yang L. Ren Z. Zhang M. Song Y. Li P. Qiu Y. et al (2021a). Three-dimensional porous SERS powder for sensitive liquid and gas detections fabricated by engineering dense “hot spots” on silica aerogel. Nanoscale Adv.3 (4), 1012–1018. 10.1039/d0na00849d
825
Yang W. Y. Ou Q. H. Li C. Y. Cheng M. M. Li W. J. Liu Y. K. (2022a). Ultrasensitive flower-like TiO2/Ag substrate for SERS detection of pigments and melamine. RSC Adv.12 (12), 6958–6965. 10.1039/d1ra08128d
826
Yang X. X. Guo Y. Z. Liang S. Hou S. Y. Chu T. T. Ma J. L. et al (2020a). Preparation of sulfur-doped carbon quantum dots from lignin as a sensor to detect Sudan I in an acidic environment. J. Mater Chem. B8 (47), 10788–10796. 10.1039/d0tb00125b
827
Yang Y. P. Sun A. L. Eslami M. (2021c). A density functional theory study on detection of amphetamine drug by silicon carbide nanotubes. Phys. E-LOW-DIMENSIONAL Syst. and NANOSTRUCTURES125, 114411. 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114411
828
Yang Z. C. Ma C. Q. Gu J. Wu Y. M. Zhu C. Li L. et al (2022c). SERS detection of benzoic acid in milk by using Ag-cof SERS substrate. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.267, 120534. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120534
829
Yang Z. C. Ma C. Q. Gu J. Wu Y. M. Zhu C. Li L. et al (2023b). Detection of melamine by using carboxyl-functionalized Ag-COF as a novel SERS substrate. Food Chem., 401. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134078
830
Yao H. F. Dong X. X. Xiong H. Liu J. W. Zhou J. Ye Y. (2022a). Functional cotton fabric-based TLC-SERS matrix for rapid and sensitive detection of mixed dyes. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.280, 121464. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121464
831
Yao W. X. Wang B. J. Wu Y. Z. Wang J. Y. Xu Z. S. Meng F. W. et al (2022b). Rapid determination of methamphetamine and cocaine in saliva by portable surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Anal. Lett.55 (18), 2944–2953. 10.1080/00032719.2022.2080839
832
Yao W. Y. Shi J. Ling J. Guo Y. D. Ding C. S. Ding Y. J. (2020). SiC-functionalized fluorescent aptasensor for determination of Proteus mirabilis. Microchim. ACTA187 (7), 406. 10.1007/s00604-020-04378-5
833
Ye J. F. Wang S. Zhang Y. J. Li B. Y. Lu M. J. Qi X. H. et al (2021). Surface-enhanced shifted excitation Raman difference spectroscopy for trace detection of fentanyl in beverages. Appl. Opt.60 (8), 2354–2361. 10.1364/ao.418579
834
Ye Z. L. Yao H. F. Zhang Y. Su A. L. Sun D. Ye Y. et al (2023). Pretreatment-free, on-site separation and sensitive identification of methamphetamine in biological specimens by SERS-active hydrogel microbeads. Anal. Chim. Acta1263, 341285. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341285
835
Yeasmin S. Ammanath G. Onder A. Yan E. V. L. Yildiz U. H. Palaniappan A. et al (2022). Current trends and challenges in point-of-care urinalysis of biomarkers in trace amounts. TRAC-TRENDS Anal. Chem.157, 116786. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116786
836
Yen Y. T. Chang Y. J. Tseng Y. T. Chen C. Y. Liu Y. L. Chang H. T. (2022a). Screening of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal mixtures using 1-dodecanethiol-gold nanoclusters. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL353, 131151. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131151
837
Yen Y. T. Lin Y. S. Chang Y. J. Li M. T. Chyueh S. C. Chang H. T. (2022b). Nanomaterial-based sensor arrays with deep learning for screening of illicit drugs. Adv. Mater Technol.7 (11). 10.1002/admt.202200243
838
Yen Y. T. Lin Y. S. Chen T. H. Chyueh S. C. Chang H. T. (2020). A carbon-dot sensing probe for screening of date rape drugs: nitro-containing benzodiazepines. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL305, 127441. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127441
839
Yen Y. T. Tseng S. H. Deng-Ying H. Tsai Y. S. Li-Wen L. Pei-Lin C. et al (2022c). Identification of a novel norketamine precursor from seized powders: 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-nitrocyclohexanone. Forensic Sci. Int. (Online)333, 111241. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111241
840
Yi K. Y. Zhang L. (2021). Designed Eu(III)-functionalized nanoscale MOF probe based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer for the reversible sensing of trace Malachite green. Food Chem.354, 129584. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129584
841
Yildirim M. Ş. Akçan R. Aras S. Tamer U. Evran E. Taştekin B. et al (2023). Overcoming obstacles: analysis of blood and semen stains washed with different chemicals with ATR-FTIR. Forensic Sci. Int.344, 111607. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111607
842
Yoo J. Kim D. Yang H. Lee M. Kim S. O. Ko H. J. et al (2022). Olfactory receptor-based CNT-FET sensor for the detection of DMMP as a simulant of sarin. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL354, 131188. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131188
843
You W. Zhao Y. B. Xu S. L. Tian S. S. (2021). Visualization of latent fingermarks on fabric using multi-metal deposition (MMD)—a preliminary study. Forensic Sci. Int.327, 110981. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110981
844
Yu B. J. Liu S. D. Xie W. H. Pan P. P. Zhou P. Zou Y. D. et al (2022b). Versatile core-shell magnetic fluorescent mesoporous microspheres for multilevel latent fingerprints magneto-optic information recognition. INFOMAT4 (5). 10.1002/inf2.12289
845
Yu B. J. Liu S. D. Zou Y. D. Deng Y. H. Yue Q. (2023a). Rough surface enhanced interfacial synthesis of core-shell magnetic fluorescent microspheres for enhanced latent fingerprint visualization. Adv. Mater Interfaces10 (8). 10.1002/admi.202202479
846
Yu J. Gai Z. X. Cheng J. Y. Tian F. Wei W. Li Y. et al (2023c). Construction of beta-cyclodextrin modified holographic sensor for the determination of ibuprofen in plasma and urine. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL385, 133650. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133650
847
Yu J. Wu J. E. Yang H. Li P. Liu J. Wang M. et al (2022c). Extremely sensitive SERS sensors based on a femtosecond laser-fabricated superhydrophobic/-philic microporous platform. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14 (38), 43877–43885. 10.1021/acsami.2c10381
848
Yu M. D. Chang Q. Zhang L. L. Huang Z. H. Song C. X. Chen Y. et al (2022a). Ultra-sensitive detecting OPs-isocarbophos using photoinduced regeneration of aptamer-based electrochemical sensors. Electroanalysis34 (6), 995–1000. 10.1002/elan.202100222
849
Yu Y. He Z. Lee A. A. M. Gao J. Tan S. C. L. Goh W. P. et al (2023b). Electrochemiluminescence drug detection with nanoparticle-encapsulated luminophore on screen-printed electrodes. Mater Today Chem.29, 101442. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101442
850
Yuan C. J. Li M. Wang M. Zhang X. M. Yin Z. H. Song K. B. et al (2020). Sensitive development of latent fingerprints using Rhodamine B-diatomaceous earth composites and principle of efficient image enhancement behind their fluorescence characteristics. Chem. Eng. J.383, 123076. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123076
851
Yuan C. J. Wang M. Li M. Sun P. R. Gao R. X. Tang J. H. (2022a). Construction, mechanism, and forensic application of green-light- excited fluorescent carbon dots/diatomite composites. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng.10, 14294–14308. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04516
852
Yuan Y. B. Chen N. Wang L. Y. Zhang X. D. Chen H. Ma P. (2022b). Rapid detection of illegally added nifedipine in Chinese traditional patent medicine by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Sci.38 (2), 359–368. 10.2116/analsci.21p148
853
Zamani R. Yamini Y. (2023). On-Chip electromembrane surrounded solid phase microextraction for determination of tricyclic antidepressants from biological fluids using poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)—graphene oxide nanocomposite as a fiber coating. Biosens. (Basel).13 (1), 139. 10.3390/bios13010139
854
Zamanian J. Khoshbin Z. Hosseinzadeh H. Danesh N. M. Abdolabadi A. K. Abnous K. et al (2022). An ultrasensitive detection platform for cocaine: aptasensing strategy in capillary tube. Front. Chem.10, 996358. 10.3389/fchem.2022.996358
855
Zanfrognini B. Pigani L. Zanardi C. (2020). Recent advances in the direct electrochemical detection of drugs of abuse. J. SOLID STATE Electrochem.24 (11–12), 2603–2616. 10.1007/s10008-020-04686-z
856
Zhang B. Hou X. Wang A. X. (2021e). “Point-of-Care SERS sensing of illicit drug residue using in-situ growth silver nanoparticles on diatomaceous photonic crystals,” in 2021 conference on lasers and electro-optics, CLEO 2021 - proceedings.
857
Zhang B. X. Hou X. W. Zhen C. Wang A. X. (2021d). Sub-part-per-billion level sensing of fentanyl residues from wastewater using portable surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensing. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.11 (10), 370. 10.3390/bios11100370
858
Zhang C. Fan Z. N. Zhan H. Zhou H. Ma R. L. Fan L. J. (2021c). Fluorescent cationic conjugated polymer-based adaptive developing strategy for both sebaceous and blood fingerprints. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces13 (23), 27419–27429. 10.1021/acsami.1c04741
859
Zhang C. Yu X. X. Shi X. M. Han Y. F. Guo Z. M. Liu Y. (2020d). Development of carbon quantum dot-labeled antibody fluorescence immunoassays for the detection of morphine in hot pot soup base. Food Anal. Methods13 (5), 1042–1049. 10.1007/s12161-020-01700-y
860
Zhang D. J. You H. J. Zhang L. L. Fang J. X. (2020g). Facile surface modification of mesoporous Au nanoparticles for highly sensitive SERS detection. Anal. Chem.92 (23), 15379–15387. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02781
861
Zhang G. H. Zou X. Y. Li H. He Y. (2021a). Visual colorimetric detection of triacetone triperoxide based on a Fe(ii)-promoted thermal decomposition process. ANALYST.146 (20), 6187–6192. 10.1039/d1an01480c
862
Zhang J. Hu S. Du Y. Cao D. Wang G. R. Yuan Z. Q. (2020b). Improved food additive analysis by ever-increasing nanotechnology. J. Food Drug Anal.28 (4), 623–641. 10.38212/2224-6614.1152
863
Zhang M. Li M. Zhao Y. Xu N. Peng L. Wang Y. et al (2021b). Novel monoclonal antibody-sandwich immunochromatographic assay based on Fe3O4/Au nanoparticles for rapid detection of fish allergen parvalbumin. Food Res. Int.142, 110102. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110102
864
Zhang M. Yu Q. Guo J. Wu B. Kong X. (2022a). Review of thin-layer chromatography tandem with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detection of analytes in mixture samples. Biosens. (Basel).12 (11), 937. 10.3390/bios12110937
865
Zhang R. L. Ren Y. M. Zhang Q. Y. Huang W. X. Bai H. P. Zeng X. F. (2022f). Water-soluble pillar[5]arene-modified graphdiyne functional material and its application towards ultrasensitive and robust electrochemical methylamphetamine determination. NEW J. Chem.46 (43), 20909–20917. 10.1039/d2nj03668a
866
Zhang S. W. Sun Y. Y. Sun Y. M. Wang H. Li Z. F. Xu Z. L. (2020c). Visual upconversion nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the semi-quantitative detection of sibutramine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.412 (29), 8135–8144. 10.1007/s00216-020-02944-7
867
Zhang T. Wu L. Pei J. Li X. Li H. Inscore F. (2022b). Part-per-billion level chemical sensing with a gold-based SERS-active substrate. Sensors22 (5), 1778. 10.3390/s22051778
868
Zhang T. S. Hu X. Y. Zu B. Y. Dou X. C. (2022c). A march to shape optical artificial olfactory system toward ultrasensitive detection of improvised explosives. Adv. Photonics Res.3 (7). 10.1002/adpr.202200006
869
Zhang T. T. Pei J. C. Li X. F. Li H. W. Inscore F. (2022g). A surface-enhanced Raman sensor for trace identification and analysis of high-priority drugs of abuse with portable and handheld Raman devices. J. RAMAN Spectrosc.53 (9), 1494–1514. 10.1002/jrs.6410
870
Zhang W. Q. Ling J. Wen D. Cheng Z. J. Wang S. P. Ding Y. J. (2022h). Simultaneous detection of acute myocardial infarction-related miR-199a and miR-499 based on a dual-emission CdTe fluorescent probe and T7 exonuclease-assisted signal amplification. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL371, 132484. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132484
871
Zhang X. Wang J. Liang J. H. Liu Z. W. Shen X. Liu Y. J. et al (2022e). A novel self-aggregated gold nanoparticles based on sensitive immunochromatographic assays for highly detection of opium poppy in herbal teas. Food Chem.390, 133188. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133188
872
Zhang Y. Li S. Peng T. Zheng P. Wang Z. Ling Z. et al (2020e). One-step icELISA developed with novel antibody for rapid and specific detection of diclazuril residue in animal-origin foods. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess.37 (10), 1633–1639. 10.1080/19440049.2020.1787527
873
Zhang Y. Li T. T. Zhang Y. J. Sun X. H. Liu H. Y. Wang Y. A. et al (2022d). Acetylcholinesterase-capped mesoporous silica gated switches for selective detection of high-toxicity organophosphate compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta.1207, 339708. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339708
874
Zhang Y. Liu Q. Chong-Bo M. Wang Q. Yang M. Du Y. (2020a). Point-of-care assay for drunken driving with Pd@Pt core-shell nanoparticles-decorated ploy(vinyl alcohol) aerogel assisted by portable pressure meter. Theranostics10 (11), 5064–5073. 10.7150/thno.42601
875
Zhang Y. Yan B. (2020). A novel cucurbit[7]uril anchored bis-functionalized metal-organic framework hybrid and its potential use in fluorescent analysis of illegal stimulants in saliva. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL324, 128656. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128656
876
Zhao F. F. Zhang T. Y. Yang Y. Lü C. L. (2020a). A facile synthesis of multifunctional carbon dots as fluorescence “turn on” and “turn off” probes for selective detection of Al3+ and 2,4,6-trinitrophenol. LUMINESCENCE.35 (8), 1277–1285. 10.1002/bio.3889
877
Zhao J. Y. Qin M. L. You J. W. Liu K. Ding L. P. Liu T. H. et al (2022a). Rapid and colorimetric evaluation of G-series nerve agents and simulants using the squaraine-ethanolamine adducts. DYES PIGMENTS.197, 109870. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109870
878
Zhao L. Y. Yang R. Q. Wei Y. Guo Y. J. Zhao Q. Zhang H. W. et al (2022d). Rapid and sensitive SERS detection of opioids in solutions based on the solid chip Au-coated Si nano-cone array. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR Biomol. Spectrosc.283, 121720. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121720
879
Zhao S. Q. Chen X. J. Huang J. W. Zhang X. N. Sun J. L. Yang L. (2022c). Point-of-care testing of methylamphetamine with a portable optical fiber immunosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta.1192, 339345. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.339345
880
Zhao Y. Jing X. H. Zheng F. J. Liu Y. M. Fan Y. (2021). Surface-enhanced Raman scattering-active plasmonic metal nanoparticle-persistent luminescence material composite films for multiple illegal dye detection. Anal. Chem.93 (25), 8945–8953. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01442
881
Zhao Y. L. Chen Q. Lv J. Xu M. M. Zhang X. Li J. R. (2022b). Specific sensing of antibiotics with metal-organic frameworks based dual sensor system. Nano Res.15 (7), 6430–6437. 10.1007/s12274-022-4306-6
882
Zhao Z. X. Shen J. W. Wang M. (2020b). Simultaneous imaging of latent fingerprint and quantification of nicotine residue by NaYF4:Yb/Tm upconversion nanoparticles. Nanotechnology31 (14), 145504. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab647c
883
Zhou C. Y. Ma J. Sun D. W. (2023). Grouping illuminants by aggregation-induced emission (AIE) mechanisms for designing sensing platforms for food quality and safety inspection. Trends Food Sci. Technol.134, 232–246. 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.03.002
884
Zhou H. F. Wu D. T. Cai W. R. (2022d). Carbon nanotubes coated with hybrid nanocarbon layers for electrochemical sensing of psychoactive drug. Electrochim Acta430, 141001. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141001
885
Zhou J. J. Gui Y. Lv X. Q. He J. L. Xie F. Li J. J. et al (2022c). Nanomaterial-based fluorescent biosensor for food safety analysis. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (12), 1072. 10.3390/bios12121072
886
Zhou J. J. Lv X. Q. Jia J. L. Din Z. U. Cai S. Q. He J. L. et al (2022a). Nanomaterials-based electrochemiluminescence biosensors for food analysis: recent developments and future directions. BIOSENSORS-BASEL.12 (11), 1046. 10.3390/bios12111046
887
Zhou S. Kuang H. Liu L. (2020). Development of an ic-ELISA and colloidal gold strip for the detection of the beta-blocker carazolol. Food Agric. Immunol.31 (1), 217–230. 10.1080/09540105.2019.1710113
888
Zhou S. Y. Xu X. X. Wang L. Guo L. L. Liu L. Q. Kuang H. et al (2021). A fluorescence based immunochromatographic sensor for monitoring chlorpheniramine and its comparison with a gold nanoparticle-based lateral-flow strip. ANALYST.146 (11), 3589–3598. 10.1039/d1an00423a
889
Zhou Y. Wang T. T. Yan L. T. Zhang G. M. Zhang Y. Zhang C. H. et al (2022b). A sensitive electrochemical analysis method of ractopamine based on Janus particles. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.50 (3), 100056. 10.1016/j.cjac.2022.100056
890
Zhu A. N. Xuan T. Zhai Y. Wu Y. P. Guo X. Y. Ying Y. et al (2021). Preparation of magnetic metal organic framework: a magnetically induced improvement effect for detection of parathion-methyl. SENSORS ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL339, 129909. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.129909
891
Zhu C. Q. Li X. Wang X. X. Su H. Y. Ma C. F. Guo X. et al (2022b). Ultrasensitive methyl salicylate gas sensing determined by Pd-doped SnO2. Front. Mater Sci.16 (4), 220625. 10.1007/s11706-022-0625-5
892
Zhu Q. Q. Wang W. Kong W. G. Chao X. K. Bi Y. Y. Li Z. H. (2022c). Metal formate framework-assisted solid fluorescent material based on carbonized nanoparticles for the detection of latent fingerprints. Anal. Chim. Acta.1209, 339864. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339864
893
Zhu W. Wen B. Y. Jie L. J. Tian X. D. Yang Z. L. Radjenovic P. M. et al (2020). Rapid and low-cost quantitative detection of creatinine in human urine with a portable Raman spectrometer. Biosens. Bioelectron.154, 112067. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112067
894
Zhu Y. J. He J. Wang Q. Y. Chen A. D. Aa J. Wang G. J. (2022a). Accurate biodetection of trace uranium by electrochemiluminescence and its application inin vivo toxicokinetic dynamic research. Biosens. Bioelectron.215, 114489. 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114489
895
Zhuang L. Gong J. Ji Y. Tian P. Kong F. Bai H. et al (2020). Lateral flow fluorescent immunoassay based on isothermal amplification for rapid quantitative detection of Salmonella spp. Analyst145 (6), 2367–2377. 10.1039/c9an02011j
896
Zimmerman N. Li H. Z. Ellis A. Hauryliuk A. Robinson E. S. Gu P. et al (2020). Improving correlations between land use and air pollutant concentrations using wavelet analysis: insights from a low-cost sensor network. Aerosol Air Qual. Res.20 (2), 314–328. 10.4209/aaqr.2019.03.0124
897
Zinna J. Lockwood T. L. E. Lieberman M. (2020). Enzyme-based paper test for detection of lactose in illicit drugs. Anal. METHODS12 (8), 1077–1084. 10.1039/c9ay02459j
898
Zou F. Y. Fu K. X. Jin C. Li M. Zhang G. L. Zhang R. L. et al (2022b). Microwave-prepared surface imprinted magnetic nanoparticles based electrochemical sensor for adsorption and determination of ketamine in sewage. Anal. Chim. Acta1217, 340025. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.340025
899
Zou R. Yu Y. Pan H. R. Zhang P. S. Cheng F. M. Zhang C. H. et al (2022a). Cross-linking induced emission of polymer micelles for high-contrast visualization level 3 details of latent fingerprints. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces14 (14), 16746–16754. 10.1021/acsami.2c02563
900
Zubrycka A. Kwasanica A. Haczkiewicz M. Sipa K. Rudnicki K. Skrzypek S. et al (2022). Illicit drugs street samples and their cutting agents. The result of the GC-MS based profiling define the guidelines for sensors development. Talanta237, 122904. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122904
Summary
Keywords
systematic review, combating crime, sensor (or biosensor), point-of-care detection, low-cost sensors, illicit drug detection, body fluid analysis, food safety analysis
Citation
Cozens AE, Johnson SD and Lee T-C (2025) A systematic review of sensors to combat crime and routes to further sensor development. Front. Chem. 13:1568867. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1568867
Received
30 January 2025
Accepted
05 May 2025
Published
12 June 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Tony D. James, University of Bath, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Chusen Huang, Shanghai Normal University, China
Shi Gang Liu, Hunan Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Cozens, Johnson and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alice E. Cozens, uctzaec@ucl.ac.ukTung-Chun Lee, tungchun.lee@ucl.ac.uk
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.