Noncovalent interactions are often described as the “soft glue” of chemistry, yet their collective influence is anything but weak (Desiraju et al., 2011; Schneider, 2022). In nitrogen- and oxygen-containing heterocycles, these forces range from classical hydrogen bonds to σ-hole contacts (Frontera and Bauzá, 2021; Siddiqui et al., 2024), π-stacking, and dispersion-driven interactions. Together, they play decisive role in controlling structure, molecular recognition, stability, reactivity, and functional behaviour across organic, inorganic, biological and materials systems. This Research Topic, Noncovalent Interactions in N/O Heterocycles, brings together four original contributions that demonstrate how understanding such subtle interactions can offer predictive control over molecular assembly and crystal engineering.
Al-Wahaibi et al. analyze a series of 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione–linked adamantyl derivatives and identify a remarkably diverse set of contacts, including C–H···N, C–H···O, C–H···Cl, C–H···S, π–π stacking, and chalcogen-based σ-hole interactions. Using single-crystal X-ray diffraction together with Hirshfeld surface analysis, Quantum Theory of Atom in Molecules (QTAIM), and generalized Kohn–Sham energy decomposition, they show how conventional and less common interactions work cooperatively to stabilize supramolecular network. Molecular docking with urokinase plasminogen activator suggests that optimizing these interactions at the protein-ligand interface may enhance antiproliferative activity, emphasizing their biological relevance. The authors also highlight the usefulness of HOMO/LUMO-based descriptors in correlating ligand electronic structure with predicted binding affinity.
Guelmami et al. examine 4-dimethylaminopyridinium-dihydrogen monophosphate, an organic–inorganic hybrid stabilized by N–H···O and O–H···O hydrogen bonds connecting the phosphate group to the heterocycle. Through MEP mapping, HOMO–LUMO analysis, ELF/LOL topology, and RDG–NCI surfaces, they show how electrostatic and dispersive contributions define the supramolecular framework. Their work illustrates that protonated N-heterocycles provide versatile building blocks for robust supramolecular architectures, with implications for molecular engineering, materials science, and functional solid-state systems.
Two additional contributions extend these insights to metalloporphyrin systems, which feature nitrogen-rich macrocycles central to many biochemical and catalytic applications. Dhifet et al. report the synthesis and characterization of a hydrogencarbonato iron(II) picket-fence porphyrin, stabilized by N–H···O, C–H···O and C–H···π interactions. Their combined crystallographic and theoretical analysis (DFT, QTAIM, ELF/LOL, and Hirshfeld analyses) reveal how electron distribution and intermolecular complementarity determine crystal packing and magnetic behaviour. Salhi et al. examine a chloride-bound, five-coordinate high-spin Fe(II) picket-fence porphyrin, where C–H···O/N/π contacts together support the supramolecular arrangement. Collectively, these studies emphasize that coordination geometry, electronic structure, and supramolecular order in metalloporphyrins are shaped by a delicate balance of weak interactions.
Across these studies, several shared messages emerge. First, noncovalent interactions are inherently cooperative. Even very weak contacts, such as H···H dispersion in adamantyl groups, can influence overall structure when combined with stronger directional forces. Second, N/O heterocycles remain exceptionally adaptable scaffolds, capable of engaging in charge-assisted hydrogen bonding, chalcogen bonding, π-stacking, and a range of electrostatic interactions. Third, coupling high-quality crystallographic data with modern theoretical methods is now indispensable for quantifying energetics, directionality, and interaction cooperativity. Increasingly, integrative methodologies that combine crystallography, computational chemistry, and structural database mining are driving new advances in supramolecular chemistry, drug discovery, and materials science (Groom et al., 2016; Jelfs, 2022; Spackman and Jayatilaka, 2009).
Importantly, the works in this Research Topic highlight how the study of weak interactions is evolving from simple qualitative descriptions toward predictive design principles. As computational power, theoretical techniques, and machine learning tools continue to grow (Tretiakov et al., 2025), we anticipate accelerated development of rational strategies for constructing functional molecular solids, biomimetic assemblies, and targeted small-molecule therapeutics.
Statements
Author contributions
ST: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. MP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. DG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully thank all the authors and reviewers who contributed to this Research Topic. ST expresses sincere gratitude to the management of SASTRA Deemed University for awarding the SASTRA Indo-Mexico G20 Chair faculty position. ST and MP also thank the Laboratorio Nacional de Supercómputo del Sureste (LNS-BUAP) and SASTRA Deemed University for providing computational resources.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author ST declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors declare that ChatGPT, an AI language model, was used to enhance clarity and improve the language flow of the manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Desiraju G. R. Vittal J. J. Ramanan A. (2011). Crystal engineering: a textbook. World Sci.
2
Frontera A. Bauzá A. (2021). On the importance of σ–Hole interactions in crystal structures. Crystals11, 1205. 10.3390/cryst11101205
3
Groom C. R. Bruno I. J. Lightfoot M. P. Ward S. C. (2016). The Cambridge structural database. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B72, 171–179. 10.1107/S2052520616003954
4
Jelfs K. E. (2022). Computational modeling to assist in the discovery of supramolecular materials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1518, 106–119. 10.1111/nyas.14913
5
Schneider H.-J. (2022). Noncovalent interactions: a brief account of a long history. J. Phys. Org. Chem.35, e4340. 10.1002/poc.4340
6
Siddiqui R. Rani J. Titi H. M. Patra R. (2024). Unravelling the potential of sigma hole-assisted co-crystallization: highlighting recent developments. Coord. Chem. Rev.517, 215994. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215994
7
Spackman M. A. Jayatilaka D. (2009). Hirshfeld surface analysis. CrystEngComm11, 19–32. 10.1039/B818330A
8
Tretiakov S. Nigam A. Pollice R. (2025). Studying noncovalent interactions in molecular systems with machine learning. Chem. Rev.125, 5776–5829. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00893
Summary
Keywords
DFT, Hirshfeld surface, molecular docking, N/O heterocycles, weak noncovalent interactions
Citation
Thamotharan S, Percino MJ and Gil DM (2025) Editorial: Noncovalent interactions in N/O heterocycles. Front. Chem. 13:1763239. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1763239
Received
08 December 2025
Revised
10 December 2025
Accepted
10 December 2025
Published
17 December 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Tony D. James, University of Bath, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Thamotharan, Percino and Gil.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Subbiah Thamotharan, thamu@scbt.sastra.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.