Abstract
In graph theory, topological indices play a significant role as numerical descriptors of a graph, helping to summarize the physicochemical properties of a molecular graph. By capturing the molecular structure, they encode various aspects, including connectivity, complexity, molecular branching, and shape. Therefore, these indices are crucial in the initial stages of drug development for identifying potential drugs. In this study, quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) models were designed using SK chromatic indices to predict the physicochemical attributes of some access group antibiotics. Linear regression is used to analyze the physicochemical properties and the topological indices.
Introduction
The AWaRe classification system was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) to guide the appropriate use of antibiotics and to prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance in the human body (World Health Organization, 2025). This system was launched in 2017 and is revised every 2 years. Antibiotics are classified into three groups, namely, Access, Watch, and Reserve, based on the priority in which they should be used (Cook and Wright, 2022). Access group antibiotics are first-line treatments used for common infections. These antibiotics are highly accessible, widely available, affordable, and have a high success rate. Watch group antibiotics are used only for specific infections and require careful monitoring. Reserve group antibiotics are used only as a last resort to treat life-threatening infections. Among all these groups, access to antibiotics is considered an important aspect because of their safe and effective clinical use. To gain a deeper understanding of access group antibiotics, we must comprehend their molecular and structural properties.
The chemical graph is a branch of graph theory that studies the molecular structure of drugs by transforming them into a molecular graph (Chartrand and Zhang, 2009). The molecular or chemical graph of a drug is a graph in which the vertices represent the atoms, and the edges between them represent the bonds connecting the atoms in the specific drug (Gao et al., 2016). Hydrogen atoms are neglected in the construction of molecular graphs, and the chemical bonds, irrespective of the multiplicity, are represented as single edges, thus forming simple underlying hydrogen-depleted graphs that focus on connectivity-based structural features. With the help of this, different topological indices are calculated to determine diverse features of molecular topology with an encrypted numerical parameter (Hayat and Asmat, 2023). Thus, topological indices are commonly used in the QSPR and QSAR analysis of different drugs (Lučić and Trinajstić, 1997). Wiener introduced the first topological index, the Wiener index, in 1947 (Wiener, 1947). It was first used to determine the physical characteristics of paraffin. Thereafter, other dimensions of topological indices were discovered, including the Randic index, the hyper-Wiener index, the connectivity index, and the Zagreb index, which have numerous applications in various fields (Gutman, 2013).
In recent years, topological indices have played a significant role in QSPR and QSAR investigations (Arockiaraj et al., 2024; Balasubramaniyan et al., 2024; Kour and Sankar, 2025). Much research has been done to find the use of chemical graph theory in QSPR analysis. Hakeem et al. (2024) studied the QSPR relationships among heart attack drugs through simple linear regression models using degree-based topological indices (Abdul et al., 2024). Parveen et al. (2022) analyzed some diabetes treatment drugs using a regression model and degree-based indices. Hosamani et al. (2017) used certain degree-based topological indices for QSPR analysis. Adnan et al. (2022) employed some degree-based topological indices to analyze some anti-tuberculosis drugs. Zhang et al. (2023) focused on computing regression models of some anti-malarial drugs using degree-based topological indices. Simran Kour et al. discussed a selection of tricyclic antidepressant drugs and anti-cancer drugs by a range of distance-based topological indices to understand their characteristics by integrating machine learning regression techniques (Kour and J., 2024; Kour and Sankar, 2025). Pandeeswari and Ravi Sankar (2025) compared two regression techniques to find the accuracy of their prediction by insighting topological indices into breast cancer drugs. Clement Johnson et al. used a zero divisor graph to find graph energy from its adjacency matrix and the Wiener index associated with the commutative rings from the zero divisor graph (Johnson and Sankar, 2023; Rayer and Jeyaraj, 2023). Sankar and Felix (2016) proposed a developed fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and examined its effectiveness through some real-life applications. QSPR analysis using chromatic topological indices is a developing topic (Bommahalli Jayaraman and Balamurugan, 2025). Waqar Ali et al. introduced lower and extremal bounds for the second hyper-Zagreb and atom connectivity indices in trees with a fixed Roman domination number (Ali et al., 2025; Ali et al., 2024). Our research focuses on the molecular structures of access group antibiotics, which are hydrogen-depleted simple underlying molecular graphs. We are interested in the structural and functional properties of these compounds, and chromatic SK indices are used to analyze them (Shigehalli and Kanabur, 2016). The aim of the study is to evaluate the chromatic topological SK indices using proper colorings of 13 access group antibiotics, compute regression models to derive QSPR on the basis of the physicochemical properties, and validate the reliability of the models by comparing the measured values to the real ones. We obtain the topological descriptors of chemical graphs, characterize their molecular properties and correlations, and demonstrate the efficacy of this methodology to various classes of therapeutics.
Materials and methods
Thirteen access group antibiotics were chosen for examination in this work, and their physicochemical characteristics were obtained from the PubChem (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), 2024) and ChemSpider databases (ChemSpider, 2025). Table 1 provides a comprehensive list of these medications together with their physicochemical characteristics, obtained from ChemSpider. Figure 1 displays the chemical structures of these medications, which were also obtained from ChemSpider. Figure 2 shows the proper coloring of the molecular graphs, which are constructed by treating the atoms in the molecule as vertices and the bonds between them as edges connecting their vertices using GeoGebra.
TABLE 1
| Drug | Density | Boiling point | Enthalpy | Flash point | Molar refractivity | Polarizabiliy | Surface tension | Molar volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 1.6 | 981.8 | 162.2 | 547.6 | 134.9 | 53.5 | 103.3 | 363.9 |
| Amoxicillin | 1.5 | 743.2 | 113.7 | 403.3 | 91.5 | 36.3 | 85.3 | 236.2 |
| Ampicillin | 1.5 | 683.9 | 105.4 | 367.4 | 89.9 | 35.7 | 74.3 | 239.3 |
| Benzylpenicillin | 1.4 | 663.3 | 102.5 | 355.0 | 86.3 | 34.2 | 67.9 | 235.2 |
| Cefalexin | 1.5 | 727.4 | 111.5 | 393.7 | 89.4 | 35.4 | 78.5 | 231.3 |
| Chloramphenicol | 1.5 | 644.9 | 100.0 | 343.8 | 72.6 | 28.8 | 66.1 | 208.8 |
| Clavulanic acid | 1.7 | 545.8 | 94.8 | 283.9 | 43.6 | 17.3 | 82.3 | 120.3 |
| Clindamycin | 1.3 | 628.1 | 106.5 | 333.6 | 107.9 | 42.8 | 56.2 | 327.2 |
| Cloxacillin | 1.6 | 689.7 | 106.2 | 370.9 | 106.2 | 42.1 | 79.2 | 279.3 |
| Metronidazole | 1.5 | 405.4 | 69.3 | 199.0 | 41.0 | 16.2 | 60.5 | 117.9 |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 1.5 | 681.4 | 105.0 | 365.9 | 88.1 | 34.9 | 69.0 | 241.2 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 1.5 | 482.1 | 74.7 | 245.4 | 62.5 | 24.8 | 70.9 | 173.1 |
| Trimethoprim | 1.3 | 405.2 | 65.7 | 198.8 | 75.5 | 29.9 | 45.7 | 220.8 |
Some access group antibiotics and their physical properties.
FIGURE 1

Access group antibiotics: (a) amikacin, (b) amoxicillin, (c) ampicillin, (d) benzylpenicillin, (e) cefalexin, (f) chloramphenicol, (g) clavulanic acid, (h) clindamycin, (i) cloxacillin, (j) metronidazole, (k) phenoxymethylpenicillin, (l) sulfamethoxazole, and (m) trimethoprim.
FIGURE 2

Proper coloring of molecular graphs of access group antibiotics: (a) amikacin, (b) amoxicillin, (c) ampicillin, (d) benzylpenicillin, (e) cefalexin, (f) chloramphenicol, (g) clavulanic acid, (h) clindamycin, (i) cloxacillin, (j) metronidazole, (k) phenoxymethylpenicillin, (l) sulfamethoxazole, and (m) trimethoprim.
SK chromatic indices
The formula was introduced in our earlier unpublished work (Rajambigai, 2024)1.In the Equations 1-3, and are colors in the set of colors and denotes the edges having the colors and . Table 2 shows computed values of the SK chromatic indices of the 13 access group antibiotics by calculating the values of the respective values and substituting in the above formula.
TABLE 2
| Chromatic topological index | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 63 | 42 | 94.5 |
| Amoxicillin | 45 | 33 | 74.5 |
| Ampicillin | 41.5 | 30.5 | 68.25 |
| Benzylpenicillin | 41.5 | 30.5 | 68.25 |
| Cefalexin | 40.5 | 27 | 60.75 |
| Chloramphenicol | 30 | 20 | 45 |
| Clavulanic acid | 26.5 | 20.5 | 45.75 |
| Clindamycin | 44 | 31 | 70.5 |
| Cloxacillin | 54 | 40.5 | 91.5 |
| Metronidazole | 20 | 15 | 34.5 |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 43.5 | 32 | 72.25 |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 28.5 | 20.5 | 46.25 |
| Trimethoprim | 33 | 22 | 49.5 |
SK chromatic indices of some access group antibiotics.
Results
The eight physicochemical properties mentioned in Table 1 are used in this study. The resulting formula is used to determine correlations between relevant chromatic topological indices and various physicochemical characteristics of access group antibiotics. The linear regression model employed in this article is
In the above formula, represents the physicochemical properties of the listed drugs, is the calculated chromatic topological index values of the respective drugs, is a constant term, and is the regression coefficient. The values of and are computed via SPSS software and Microsoft Excel by evaluating the physicochemical properties and the chromatic topological index values across the 13 access group antibiotics. Here, the physicochemical properties of the drugs are considered as dependent values, and the chromatic topological indices of the molecular graphs of the access group antibiotics are considered as independent variables. By applying Equation 4, the linear regression model for the previously mentioned chromatic topological indices is expressed in Table 3.
TABLE 3
| Density | |||
| Boiling point | |||
| Enthalpy | |||
| Flash point | |||
| Molar refractivity | |||
| Polarizability | |||
| Surface tension | |||
| Molar volume |
Regression models for SK chromatic index.
Relationship between correlation coefficients and physicochemical properties of the drugs
In this study, the correlations of the chromatic SK indices and the eight physicochemical properties are listed in Table 4; the correlations that are strong are highlighted in bold, and the relationship is graphically represented in Figure 3. The correlation coefficients were generated to assess the link between molecular characteristics and chromatic topological indices. All statistical computations, including the calculation of correlation coefficients, were performed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation).
TABLE 4
| Chromatic topological index | Density | Boiling point | Enthalpy | Flash point | Molar refractivity | Polarizability | Surface tension | Molar volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0882 | 0.8619 | 0.8427 | 0.8619 | 0.9609 | 0.9609 | 0.5746 | 0.9080 | |
| 0.1380 | 0.8244 | 0.7979 | 0.8244 | 0.9125 | 0.9126 | 0.5739 | 0.8532 | |
| 0.1322 | 0.8205 | 0.7948 | 0.8205 | 0.9138 | 0.9139 | 0.5680 | 0.8559 |
Correlation coefficients of physical properties.
Significant values are highlighted in bold.
FIGURE 3

Graphical representation between correlation coefficients and physiochemical properties of the drugs.
Assessment of statistical metrics and standard estimation error
The statistical metrics are integrated for all chromatic topological indices and physicochemical properties in Tables 5–7 to help us understand the relationship among them. The statistical parameters for all the chromatic topological indices, including the sample size , the constant term , the slope , the percentage of dependent variables , Fisher’s statistic, the significance value , and the significance of the relationship, are observed. In terms of interpretation, a -value less than 0.05 is deemed statistically significant; a -value greater than 0.05 is considered an absence of statistical significance. These metrics not only allow comparisons but also give well-informed calculations. Table 8 lists the standard estimation error for the physicochemical properties of the access group antibiotics. The calculation of standard estimation error improves the accuracy of predictions from QSPR models. Tables 9–16 show the comparison between the original and calculated values of physicochemical properties from regression models of the SK chromatic indices.
TABLE 5
| Property | N | A | b | p | F | Indicator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 13 | 1.459 | 0.001 | 0.0078 | 0.7731 | 0.087 | Non-significant |
| Boiling point | 13 | 189.2 | 11.36 | 0.7447 | 0.0001 | 32.08 | Significant |
| Enthalpy | 13 | 32.48 | 1.747 | 0.7095 | 0.0003 | 26.86 | Significant |
| Flash point | 13 | 68.23 | 6.871 | 0.7445 | 0.0001 | 32.06 | Significant |
| Molar refractivity | 13 | 0.659 | 2.109 | 0.9234 | 0.0000 | 132.5 | Significant |
| Polarizability | 13 | 0.230 | 0.836 | 0.9234 | 0.0000 | 132.6 | Significant |
| Surface tension | 13 | 44.37 | 0.707 | 0.3303 | 0.0399 | 5.425 | Significant |
| Molar volume | 13 | 17.05 | 5.411 | 0.8257 | 0.0000 | 52.17 | Significant |
Statistical metrics integrated into the QSPR modeling framework for the index.
TABLE 6
| Property | N | A | b | p | F | Indicator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 13 | 1.439 | 0.002 | 0.0191 | 0.6528 | 0.214 | Non-significant |
| Boiling point | 13 | 199.8 | 15.55 | 0.6798 | 0.0005 | 23.36 | Significant |
| Enthalpy | 13 | 34.77 | 2.368 | 0.6349 | 0.0011 | 19.13 | Significant |
| Flash point | 13 | 74.61 | 9.407 | 0.6798 | 0.0005 | 23.35 | Significant |
| Molar refractivity | 13 | 3.192 | 2.867 | 0.8311 | 0.0000 | 54.15 | Significant |
| Polarizability | 13 | 1.231 | 1.138 | 0.8314 | 0.0000 | 54.25 | Significant |
| Surface tension | 13 | 43.83 | 1.011 | 0.3286 | 0.0405 | 5.384 | Significant |
| Molar volume | 13 | 26.11 | 7.264 | 0.7249 | 0.0002 | 28.98 | Significant |
Statistical metrics integrated into the QSPR modeling framework for the index.
TABLE 7
| Property | N | A | b | p | F | Indicator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 13 | 1.441 | 0.001 | 0.0176 | 0.6662 | 0.197 | Non-significant |
| Boiling point | 13 | 200.8 | 6.885 | 0.6738 | 0.0006 | 22.72 | Significant |
| Enthalpy | 13 | 34.88 | 1.049 | 0.6303 | 0.0012 | 18.75 | Significant |
| Flash point | 13 | 75.24 | 4.164 | 0.6737 | 0.0006 | 22.72 | Significant |
| Molar refractivity | 13 | 2.890 | 1.277 | 0.8339 | 0.0000 | 55.23 | Significant |
| Polarizability | 13 | 1.112 | 0.507 | 0.8342 | 0.0000 | 55.33 | Significant |
| Surface tension | 13 | 44.05 | 0.445 | 0.3221 | 0.0431 | 5.227 | Significant |
| Molar volume | 13 | 24.99 | 3.241 | 0.7299 | 0.0002 | 29.72 | Significant |
Statistical metrics integrated into the QSPR modeling framework for the index.
TABLE 8
| Drug | Density | Boiling point | Enthalpy | Flash point | Molar refractivity | Polarizability | Surface tension | Molar volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1160 | 81.7306 | 13.6715 | 49.4409 | 7.4429 | 2.9558 | 12.3310 | 30.2753 | |
| 0.1154 | 91.2377 | 15.3054 | 55.1895 | 10.9908 | 4.3402 | 12.3372 | 38.0288 | |
| 0.1155 | 92.1425 | 15.4069 | 55.7371 | 10.9120 | 4.3275 | 12.3989 | 37.6972 |
Standard error estimation for some physical properties of the drugs.
TABLE 9
| Drug | Density (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 1.51 | 1.52 | 1.52 | |
| Amoxicillin | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| Ampicillin | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Cefalexin | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |
| Clindamycin | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Cloxacillin | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.51 | |
| Metronidazole | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.47 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.48 | |
| Trimethoprim | 1.49 | 1.48 | 1.48 |
Comparison between the original and calculated density values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 10
| Drug | Boiling point (at 760 mmHg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 904.9 | 852.9 | 851.4 | |
| Amoxicillin | 700.4 | 712.9 | 713.7 | |
| Ampicillin | 660.6 | 674.0 | 670.7 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 660.6 | 674.1 | 670.7 | |
| Cefalexin | 649.3 | 619.7 | 619.1 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 530.0 | 510.8 | 510.6 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 490.2 | 518.6 | 515.8 | |
| Clindamycin | 689.0 | 681.9 | 686.2 | |
| Cloxacillin | 802.6 | 829.6 | 830.8 | |
| Metronidazole | 416.4 | 433.1 | 438.3 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 683.4 | 697.4 | 698.2 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 512.9 | 518.6 | 519.2 | |
| Trimethoprim | 564.1 | 541.9 | 541.6 |
Comparison between the original and calculated boiling point values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 11
| Drug | Enthalpy (KJ/mol) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 142.54 | 134.22 | 134.01 | |
| Amoxicillin | 111.09 | 112.91 | 113.03 | |
| Ampicillin | 104.98 | 106.99 | 106.47 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 104.98 | 106.99 | 106.47 | |
| Cefalexin | 103.23 | 98.71 | 98.61 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 84.89 | 82.13 | 82.09 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 78.78 | 83.31 | 82.87 | |
| Clindamycin | 109.35 | 108.18 | 82.09 | |
| Cloxacillin | 126.82 | 130.67 | 130.86 | |
| Metronidazole | 67.42 | 70.29 | 71.07 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 108.47 | 110.55 | 110.67 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 82.27 | 83.31 | 83.39 | |
| Trimethoprim | 90.13 | 86.87 | 86.81 |
Comparison between the original and calculated enthalpy values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 12
| Drug | Flash point (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 501.10 | 469.70 | 468.74 | |
| Amoxicillin | 377.43 | 385.04 | 385.46 | |
| Ampicillin | 353.38 | 361.52 | 359.43 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 353.38 | 361.52 | 359.43 | |
| Cefalexin | 346.51 | 328.59 | 328.20 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 274.36 | 262.75 | 262.62 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 250.31 | 267.45 | 265.74 | |
| Clindamycin | 370.55 | 366.23 | 368.80 | |
| Cloxacillin | 439.26 | 455.59 | 456.25 | |
| Metronidazole | 205.65 | 215.72 | 218.89 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 367.12 | 375.65 | 376.09 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 264.05 | 267.45 | 267.83 | |
| Trimethoprim | 294.97 | 281.56 | 281.36 |
Comparison between the original and calculated flash point values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 13
| Drug | Molar refractivity (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 133.53 | 123.61 | 123.57 | |
| Amoxicillin | 95.56 | 97.80 | 98.03 | |
| Ampicillin | 88.18 | 90.64 | 90.05 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 88.18 | 90.64 | 90.05 | |
| Cefalexin | 86.07 | 80.60 | 80.47 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 63.93 | 60.53 | 60.36 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 56.55 | 61.97 | 61.31 | |
| Clindamycin | 93.46 | 92.07 | 92.92 | |
| Cloxacillin | 114.55 | 119.31 | 119.74 | |
| Metronidazole | 42.84 | 46.19 | 46.95 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 92.40 | 94.94 | 95.15 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 60.77 | 61.97 | 61.95 | |
| Trimethoprim | 70.26 | 66.27 | 66.10 |
Comparison between the original and calculated molar refractivity values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 14
| Drug | Polarizability (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 52.96 | 49.03 | 49.01 | |
| Amoxicillin | 37.89 | 38.79 | 38.87 | |
| Ampicillin | 34.96 | 35.94 | 35.70 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 34.96 | 35.94 | 35.70 | |
| Cefalexin | 34.12 | 31.96 | 31.90 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 25.34 | 23.99 | 23.92 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 22.41 | 24.56 | 24.29 | |
| Clindamycin | 37.05 | 36.51 | 36.84 | |
| Cloxacillin | 45.42 | 47.32 | 47.48 | |
| Metronidazole | 16.97 | 18.30 | 18.59 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 36.64 | 37.65 | 37.73 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 24.08 | 24.56 | 24.55 | |
| Trimethoprim | 27.85 | 26.27 | 26.19 |
Comparison between the original and calculated polarizability values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 15
| Drug | Surface tension (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 88.92 | 86.29 | 86.09 | |
| Amoxicillin | 76.19 | 77.19 | 77.19 | |
| Ampicillin | 73.72 | 74.67 | 74.41 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 73.72 | 74.67 | 74.41 | |
| Cefalexin | 73.01 | 71.13 | 71.08 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 65.59 | 64.05 | 64.07 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 63.11 | 64.56 | 64.40 | |
| Clindamycin | 75.49 | 75.17 | 75.42 | |
| Cloxacillin | 82.56 | 84.78 | 84.76 | |
| Metronidazole | 58.51 | 58.99 | 59.39 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 75.13 | 76.18 | 76.19 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 64.53 | 64.56 | 64.63 | |
| Trimethoprim | 67.71 | 66.07 | 66.07 |
Comparison between the original and calculated surface tension values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
TABLE 16
| Drug | Molar volume (in ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amikacin | 357.94 | 331.19 | 331.27 | |
| Amoxicillin | 260.55 | 265.82 | 266.44 | |
| Ampicillin | 241.61 | 247.66 | 246.19 | |
| Benzylpenicillin | 241.61 | 247.66 | 246.19 | |
| Cefalexin | 236.19 | 222.24 | 221.88 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 179.38 | 171.39 | 170.84 | |
| Clavulanic acid | 160.44 | 175.02 | 173.27 | |
| Clindamycin | 255.13 | 251.29 | 253.48 | |
| Cloxacillin | 309.24 | 320.30 | 321.54 | |
| Metronidazole | 125.27 | 135.07 | 136.80 | |
| Phenoxymethylpenicillin | 252.43 | 258.56 | 259.15 | |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 171.26 | 175.02 | 174.89 | |
| Trimethoprim | 195.61 | 185.92 | 185.42 |
Comparison between the original and calculated molar volume values from regression models of chromatic topological indices.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the correlation between the three chromatic topological indices and eight physicochemical properties of 13 access group antibiotics. The data listed in Table 3 show the correlation coefficients, especially the strong correlations ( are highlighted in bold) noted between three chromatic topological indices and six physicochemical attributes. Upon examining all, the index illustrated the strongest correlation with the following properties: boiling point , enthalpy , flash point , molar refractivity , polarizability , and molar volume , which shows that this chromatic topological index may be an effective predictor of these molecular properties. On the other hand, all the chromatic topological indices show weak correlation with density, thus having a trivial impact on this physicochemical property.
The QSPR analysis using the statistical attributes such as , -statistic, -value, and regression coefficient are listed in Tables 5–7. Both molar refractivity and polarizability show strong dependency on the index . Notably, molar refractivity has , , and with the index, and polarizability has , , and with the index. Similarly, the molar volume, boiling point, flash point, and enthalpy show moderate dependency on . Molar volume has , , and with the index. Boiling point has , , and with the index. Flash point has , , and with the index, and enthalpy has , , and with the index. The density and surface tension show weak dependency. This analysis shows that the values of the chromatic SK index are necessary to understand the property of interest, such as polarizability, which helps elucidate the intermolecular forces and supports designing models with specific dielectric properties, thus playing a crucial role in model development.
Similarly, the values of the chromatic SK index for predicting molar refractivity and enthalpy can also be used for drug design, although the estimated error is slightly high. Because density and surface tension have a weak correlation, more advanced techniques may be needed, such as non-linear models or hybrid modeling, for more accuracy. Therefore, the study demonstrates the need to modify QSPR models to define physicochemical attributes to improve predictions and guide future work.
Conclusion
Three coloring-based topological indices have been used to characterize the structural attributes of some access group antibiotics. QSPR analysis has also been done on the spatial arrangement of atoms and the physicochemical characteristics of certain drugs. It is found that some chromatic topological indices are effective at predicting properties, such as polarizability, molar refractivity, and enthalpy. Therefore, the study shows that molecular structure plays an important role in determining the properties of certain drugs, indicating that chromatic topological indices are necessary for predicting such properties. This technique helps speed drug development by enabling efficient identification of suitable drugs, thereby minimizing the need for research facilities.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
RR: Writing – original draft. TP: Writing – review and editing, Validation, Investigation, Conceptualization, Supervision. JR: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Validation, Visualization, Supervision, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1.^ Chromatic SK indices of certain flower graphs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
References
1
Abdul H. Muhammad Katbar N. Muhammad F. Ahmed N. (2024). Qspr analysis of some important drugs used in heart attack treatment via degree-based topological indices and regression models. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.44 (8), 5237–5246. 10.1080/10406638.2023.2262697
2
Adnan Mr Abbas G. Iqbal T. (2022). Degree-based topological indices and qspr analysis of antituberculosis drugs. J. Chem. (1), 5748626. 10.1155/2022/5748626
3
Ali W. Husin M. N. Nadeem M. F. (2024). Extremal bounds of the atom-bond connectivity index in trees with a fixed roman domination number. Malaysian J. of Math. Sci.19(4): 1197–1210.
4
Ali W. Nazri Husin M. Nadeem M. F. Jabin M. (2025). Lower bound for the second hyper-zagreb index of trees with a given roman domination number. Math. Statistics13, 12–16. 10.13189/ms.2025.130102
5
Arockiaraj M. Campena F. J. H. Greeni A. B. Ghani M. U. Gajavalli S. Tchier F. et al (2024). Qspr analysis of distance-based structural indices for drug compounds in tuberculosis treatment. Heliyon10 (2), e23981. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23981
6
Balasubramaniyan D. Chidambaram N. Ravi V. Siddiqui M. K. (2024). Qspr analysis of anti-asthmatic drugs using some new distance-based topological indices: a comparative study. Int. J. Quantum Chem.124 (9), e27372. 10.1002/qua.27372
7
Bommahalli Jayaraman B. Balamurugan B. J. (2025). Qspr graph model to explore physicochemical properties of potential antiviral drugs of dengue disease through novel coloring-based topological indices. Front. Chem.13, 1599715. 10.3389/fchem.2025.1599715
8
Chartrand G. Zhang P. (2009). Chromatic Graph Theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience
9
ChemSpider (2025). ChemSpider database. Available online at: https://www.chemspider.com (Accessed May 15, 2025).
10
Cook M. A. Wright G. D. (2022). The past, present, and future of antibiotics. Sci. Translational Medicine14 (657), eabo7793. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo7793
11
Gao W. Wang W. Farahani M. R. (2016). Topological indices study of molecular structure in anticancer drugs. J. Chemistry2016 (1), 3216327–3216328. 10.1155/2016/3216327
12
Gutman I. (2013). Degree-based topological indices. Croat. Chemica Acta86 (4), 351–361. 10.5562/cca2294
13
Hakeem A. Katbar N. M. Muhammad F. Ahmed N. (2024). Qspr analysis of some important drugs used in heart attack treatment via degree-based topological indices and regression models. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds44 (8), 5237–5246.
14
Hayat S. Asmat F. (2023). Sharp bounds on the generalized multiplicative first Zagreb index of graphs with application to qspr modeling. Mathematics11 (10), 2245. 10.3390/math11102245
15
Hosamani S. Perigidad D. Jamagoud S. Maled Y. Gavade S. (2017). Qspr analysis of certain degree based topological indices. J. Statistics Appl. and Probab.6 (2), 361–371. 10.18576/jsap/060211
16
Johnson C. Sankar R. (2023). Graph energy and topological descriptors of zero divisor graph associated with commutative ring. J. Appl. Math. Comput.69 (3), 2641–2656. 10.1007/s12190-023-01837-z
17
Kour S. J. R. S. (2024). Machine learning regression models for predicting anti-cancer drug properties: insights from topological indices in qspr analysis. Contemp. Math., 6515–6526. 10.37256/cm.5420245826
18
Kour S. Sankar J. R. (2025). Characterization of tricyclic anti-depressant drugs efficacy via topological indices. Sci. Rep.15 (1), 22853. 10.1038/s41598-025-05045-6
19
Lučić B. Trinajstić N. (1997). New developments in qspr/qsar modeling based on topological indices. SAR QSAR Environmental Research7 (1-4), 45–62. 10.1080/10629369708039124
20
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (2024). PubChem compound summary. Available online at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (Accessed July 13, 2025).
21
Pandeeswari E. Ravi Sankar J. (2025). Topological insights into breast cancer drugs: a qspr approach using resolving topological indices. Front. Chem.13, 1710442. 10.3389/fchem.2025.1710442
22
Parveen S. Awan N.U. H. Mohammed M. Bashir Farooq F. Iqbal N. (2022). Topological indices of novel drugs used in diabetes treatment and their qspr modeling. J. Math.2022 (1), 5209329. 10.1155/2022/5209329
23
Rayer C. J. Jeyaraj R. S. (2023). Wiener index and graph energy of zero divisor graph for commutative rings. Asian-European J. Math.16 (11), 2350211. 10.1142/s179355712350211x
24
Sankar J. R. Felix A. (2016). An improved fuzzy dematel technique and its applications. Int. J. Pharm. Technology8 (3), 19122–19134.
25
Shigehalli V. Kanabur R. (2016). New version of degree-based topological indices of certain nanotube. J. Math. Nanosci.6 (1), 29–42.
26
Wiener H. (1947). Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J. Am. Chemical Society69 (1), 17–20. 10.1021/ja01193a005
27
World Health Organization (2025). The selection and use of essential medicines, 2025: who model list of essential medicines. 24th list. Geneva, Switzerland: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 10.2471/B09474
28
Zhang X. Reddy H. G. Usha A. Shanmukha M. C. Farahani M. R. Alaeiyan M. (2023). A study on anti-malaria drugs using degree-based topological indices through qspr analysis. Math. Biosci. Eng.20 (2), 3594–3609. 10.3934/mbe.2023167
Summary
Keywords
access group antibiotics, proper coloring, quantitative structure–property relationship analysis, regression models, SK chromatic indices
Citation
Rajambigai R, Praveen T and Ravi Sankar J (2026) Structure–efficiency relationship of access group antibiotics via SK chromatic descriptors. Front. Chem. 14:1763932. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2026.1763932
Received
09 December 2025
Revised
02 January 2026
Accepted
06 January 2026
Published
17 February 2026
Volume
14 - 2026
Edited by
Renjith Thomas, Mahatma Gandhi University, India
Reviewed by
Waqar Ali, University of Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
Mehran Azeem, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Pakistan
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Rajambigai, Praveen and Ravi Sankar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: T. Praveen, praveen.t@vit.ac.in; J. Ravi Sankar, ravisankar.j@vit.ac.in
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.