EDITORIAL article

Front. Mater., 14 May 2025

Sec. Structural Materials

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1614419

This article is part of the Research TopicStructural Applications of Concrete with Recycled Solid Wastes and Alternatives for CementView all 10 articles

Editorial: Structural applications of concrete with recycled solid wastes and alternatives for cement

  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 2National Key Laboratory of Green and Long-Life Road Engineering in Extreme Environment (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
  • 3College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
  • 4Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Concrete, as the most widely utilized construction material, has long been central to discussions on sustainability due to its intensive consumption of natural resources and significant carbon footprint. In light of increasing environmental and economic challenges, there is a growing interest among researchers and engineers in developing sustainable alternatives by integrating recycled solid waste and alternative binders into concrete. This paradigm shift not only addresses issues of waste management and resource depletion but also supports the advancement of innovative, high-performance materials suitable for structural applications. This special issue compiles a diverse range of original research and review articles focused on recent advances in sustainable concrete. The contributions span material development, durability assessment, and emerging computational and experimental strategies for optimizing mix design and structural behavior. These works collectively highlight the transition toward environmentally responsible, high-performance construction solutions.

Chen et al. proposed a systemic approach for the reuse of construction waste from abandoned buildings by establishing a material flow analysis and an evaluation index system. Their study identifies critical opportunities and challenges in the recycling process and offers a valuable framework for advancing circular economy practices within the built environment.

As far as material development is concerned, Umar et al. investigated the incorporation of bentonite clay and quarry dust as supplementary cementitious materials. Their findings indicate enhancements in compressive strength and resistance to both hydrochloric and sulfuric acids, underscoring the potential of these materials as sustainable and cost-effective alternatives to traditional cement. He et al. employed machine learning, specifically support vector regression, to predict the mechanical behavior of cement-based materials filled with PVA-modified waste rubber. Their results affirm the utility of AI-driven tools in optimizing mix design and forecasting performance with high accuracy.

Bond behavior between concrete and steel reinforcement remains critical in structural applications. Shusen et al. explored the effect of a sludge-modified magnesium phosphate coating on bond performance. While bond strength improved for plain bars, a slight reduction was observed in ribbed bars, suggesting the need for differentiated strategies depending on reinforcement type.

Zhou et al. addressed long-term performance through enhanced creep modeling of green concrete. Utilizing the Weeks method of inverse Laplace transform, they obtained continuous retardation spectra with improved accuracy and computational efficiency. This advancement supports more reliable long-term structural analysis and deformation prediction.

Structural innovations were explored through advanced composite systems. Liu et al. introduced a novel multi-chamber concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) column with round-ended sections to enhance seismic performance. Static load testing confirmed increased ductility and energy dissipation. Jun et al. investigated CFST circular arches, analyzing the effects of geometric and material parameters. Their experimental and numerical studies revealed that arch foot slip and local buckling notably influence load-bearing capacity, offering practical insights for the design of underground support structures.

The reduction of CO2 emissions is another central theme. Wang et al. examined the role of dispersants in nanocarbon black-modified cement paste. Their findings show that improved dispersion enhances mechanical and electrical properties, accelerates snow-melting performance, and lowers energy use and carbon emissions based on life-cycle assessment (LCA). Similarly, Ning et al. developed permeable concrete using alkali-activated sintered sludge and slag. Their work demonstrates that increasing sludge content significantly decreases CO2 emissions while preserving adequate permeability, providing a viable solution for sustainable urban infrastructure.

Altogether, these contributions illustrate the breadth and depth of contemporary research on sustainable structural concrete. By integrating recycled materials and alternative binders and adopting advanced modeling and design techniques, researchers are paving the way toward environmentally responsible and economically feasible construction practices. The studies highlighted here demonstrate the value of interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation in achieving high-performance, sustainable infrastructure.

We extend our sincere appreciation to all authors for their contributions and to the editorial staff of Frontiers in Materials for facilitating this Research Topic.

Author contributions

BH: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. JL: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. NN: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. RH: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. MT: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI was used to improve the manuscript’s English writing.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: green concrete, carbon emisions, solid waste, waste managemen, cement alternative

Citation: Hu B, Lin J, Nistico' N, Hu R and Tahir M (2025) Editorial: Structural applications of concrete with recycled solid wastes and alternatives for cement. Front. Mater. 12:1614419. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1614419

Received: 18 April 2025; Accepted: 22 April 2025;
Published: 14 May 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

John L. Provis, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Switzerland

Copyright © 2025 Hu, Lin, Nistico', Hu and Tahir. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rui Hu, amlhcnVpaHVAc3p1LmVkdS5jbg==; Muhammad Tahir, ZW5ncm10YWhpcjA5QHN6dS5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.