Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mater., 10 September 2025

Sec. Structural Materials

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1629892

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvanced Materials and Technologies for Sustainable Development of Underground Resources - Volume IIView all 3 articles

Experimental study on dynamic characteristics and energy dissipation of weakly cemented rock-like materials

Guodong ShiGuodong Shi1Duoxi Yao
Duoxi Yao1*Jiehao Wu,Jiehao Wu2,3Fangyi MengFangyi Meng2
  • 1School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China
  • 2National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Building Health Monitoring and Disaster Prevention Technology, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, China
  • 3School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China

The structural stability of coal seam roof rock mass under dynamic load in engineering practice is directly influenced by the dynamic characteristics of weakly consolidated coal measures rock. A study was conducted on two types of rocks, mudstone and siltstone, around the roof of coal seam No. 31 in Renlou Coal Mine, northern Anhui Province. Rock-like specimens were created using similar materials for analysis. The mechanical properties, energy dissipation characteristics, and fractal characteristics of these rocks were investigated using a 75 mm Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test system at five different impact velocities. The findings are as follows: 1) As the impact velocity increases, the strain rate of the rock linearly increases while the dynamic uniaxial compressive strength exponentially increases. 2) With an increase in strain rate, there is a negative correlation between rock fragmentation and a positive correlation with the number of fragments produced; additionally, the fractal dimension shows an increasing quadratic term function relationship. 3) There exists a linear positive correlation between incident energy and impact velocity; moreover, as incident energy increases, so does the amount of energy lost due to rock breakage. These research results provide both theoretical and experimental foundations for mine dynamic disaster protection.

1 Introduction

Coal plays a strategic role in China’s economic development system and holds a crucial position in the energy structure (Li and Yuan, 2023; Wang S. M. et al., 2022; Kang et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2025; Xie et al., 2022; Wu J. Y. et al., 2024). As coal resources mining transitions to deeper formations, the deep formation rocks exhibit characteristics of “three heights and one disturbance” (Shu et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024; Zheng Q. Q. et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2025), leading to a complex stress state and frequent dynamic disasters such as rock bursts, floor protrusions, and roof cavings (Hao et al., 2022; Gong et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2023; Tan et al., 2024; Zheng Q. et al., 2024; Lyu et al., 2022; Deng et al., 2023). Engineering disasters like large deformations, high ground pressures, and challenging roadway support under dynamic loading are on the rise (Zhang et al., 2019; He et al., 2024; Yin et al., 2024). Blasting is a significant method for coal mine rock roadway excavation and forced caving (Yue et al., 2022; Zhou K. et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2023; Cheng et al., 2024; Zuo et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2025; Liao et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2025; Zheng et al., 2025). Therefore, it is imperative to analyze and summarize the mechanical characteristics of coal seam roof rocks under dynamic actions to ensure the safe mining of coal and rock.

In recent years, SHPB has gained significant traction in investigating the dynamic mechanical properties of rock materials under medium and high strain rates. Shi (Shi et al., 2023a; Shi et al., 2023b) based on observations from SHPB test results, proposed new concepts of internal cohesion and internal friction angle for quantitative analysis of the pre-peak and post-peak stages of the dynamic loading process of sandstone. Rae et al. (Rae et al., 2020; Zuo et al., 2022; Fang S. et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023) conducted SHPB impact compression tests on both soft rock and hard rock, and found a significant correlation between strain rate and rock strength. Additionally, the study revealed that rock strength decreases significantly with an increase in fractal dimension. Liu et al. (Liu et al., 2022; Wang X. et al., 2022; You et al., 2022; Zhou T. et al., 2022; Wen et al., 2023; Xia et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2024; Wu J. H. et al., 2024) conducted dynamic splitting experiments on brittle rock and discovered a highly significant linear positive correlation between the dynamic tensile strength and the loading rate. Moreover, it was observed that the failure of rock specimens initiated from internal defects, with changes in geometric characteristics of these defects influencing the fracture mode. Numerous researchers (Yuan et al., 2022; Zhou J. et al., 2022; Lyu et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) have conducted impact fracture experiments on rock samples and found that the energy dissipation characteristics of rock samples are related to the distribution of fragment sizes, and various efficiency indicators have been proposed to represent the crushing efficiency under different conditions.

The dynamic behavior of weakly cemented rocks, in particular, is a critical concern due to their inherent instability. Studies on materials like weakly cemented red sandstone (Fang S. Z. et al., 2023) and argillaceous weakly cemented rock (Meng et al., 2020) have highlighted their strain rate sensitivity and unique energy absorption patterns under dynamic loads. The deformation and failure of rock-like materials is essentially a process of energy dissipation (Chen et al., 2022), making the study of energy transformation and dissipation mechanisms crucial for understanding their response to impact loads and for assessing the stability of engineering rock masses. For instance, comprehensive studies on other rock types like sandstone, such as those by Yuan et al. (Yuan et al., 2024), have detailed how factors like environmental conditions (e.g., acidic drying-wetting cycles) and loading parameters affect fragmentation and energy dissipation characteristics, providing a methodological benchmark for rock dynamic studies.

The on-site sampling, transport, and processing of intact rock specimens from deep, weakly cemented coal seam roof levels are often difficult, complex, and have a low success rate due to the friable nature of these materials (Sun et al., 2019). While the aforementioned studies (Shi et al., 2023a; Shi et al., 2023b; Rae et al., 2020; Zuo et al., 2022; Fang S. et al., 2023; Sun et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2022; Wang X. et al., 2022; You et al., 2022; Zhou T. et al., 2022; Wen et al., 2023; Xia et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2024; Wu J. H. et al., 2024; Yuan et al., 2022; Zhou J. et al., 2022; Lyu et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) and newer investigations (Yuan et al., 2024); Wang et al. (Fang S. Z. et al., 2023) provide valuable insights into the dynamic behavior of various rock types, including some naturally occurring weakly cemented rocks, a specific gap exists. There is a pressing need for systematic investigations into the dynamic characteristics and energy dissipation of analogous materials specifically fabricated to represent the properties of problematic weakly cemented strata, such as the mudstone and friable sandstone encountered in particular coal seam roofs. Research that directly compares the dynamic response, failure modes, and energy dissipation patterns of different types of analogous weakly cemented rock-like materials under controlled impact conditions is less common. This limits the direct applicability of findings to engineering scenarios where such specific, difficult-to-sample, weakly cemented rocks dominate.

To address this issue, the study employs the method of fabricating analogous specimens, conducting SHPB compression experiments to evaluate the mechanical properties and failure modes of mudstone and friable sandstone specimens under impact loading to provide theoretical support for safeguarding the No. 31 coal seam roof.

2 Impact testing of weakly cemented rock-like materials

2.1 Preparation of specimens

The rock sample investigated was obtained from the mudstone-siltstone interlayer roof of coal seam No. 31 in Renlou Coal Mine, located at the intersection of Suixi County, Huaibei City and Mengcheng County, Bozhou City, Anhui Province. In order to ensure the authenticity of the simulation test, a rock sample collected from the site was meticulously cut and polished into a standardized specimen measuring Ф50 mm × 100 mm, followed by comprehensive physical and mechanical property testing. The detailed results of these tests are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Mechanical properties of the overlying roof in coal seams No. 31 (minmaxmean).

Based on extensive research conducted by scholars (Wang et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2024) and in conjunction with the precise measurement of mechanical properties of roof rock from seam No. 31 in Renlou Coal Mine, the proportion of the composition of the corresponding rock-like material produced by mixing is shown in Table 2. Subsequently, the analogous materials were fabricated using the established mix ratio. The static mechanical properties of the rock-like materials were evaluated using the electronic universal testing machine located at the School of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University. The specimen dimensions were Ф50 mm × 100 mm. The comprehensive static mechanical properties were systematically documented in Table 3. The mold used in this test has an internal size of Ф70 mm × 35 mm, and the resulting specimens are suitable for direct use in impact testing, as depicted in Figure 1.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The ratio between two analogous rock materials.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Mechanical parameters of similar materials.

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the preparation of specimens. Cement, gypsum, sand, and water are mixed in a mixing station for three minutes. The mixture is poured into a mold, followed by demolding to produce cylindrical specimens shown in a grid format.

Figure 1. Preparation procedure for rock-like specimens.

2.2 Experimental apparatus and underlying principles

The test was conducted at the National-local joint Engineering Laboratory of building health monitoring and disaster prevention technology, Anhui Jianzhu University. The SHPB equipment (model: ZLKJ-SHPB-75) as shown in Figure 2 (Zuo et al., 2022). The incident rod, transmission rod, and bullet have lengths of 3000mm, 2500mm, and 500 mm respectively; their diameter is 75 mm. Additionally, the elastic modulus is measured as 206 GPa with a density of 7820 kg/m3 and Poisson ratio of 0.29.

Figure 2
Diagram of a mechanical system with labeled components. On the left, a cylindrical part labeled

Figure 2. (Wu J. H. et al., 2024): 1-Plenum chamber, 2-Emission cavity, 3-Impact bar, 4-Laser source, 5-Input bar, 6-Specimen, 7-Transmission bar, 8-Strain gauge, 9-Damper, 10-Speed measuring device system, 11-Ultra-dynamic strain gauge, 12-Oscillograph, 13-Data processing system.

The SHPB impact test fulfills the assumptions of one-dimensional stress wave propagation and uniform stress distribution. The voltage signal acquired from the strain gauge is converted into a strain signal, and using the three-wave method (as Formulas 13) to calculate the stress σt, strain εt, and strain rate ε˙t of specimen (Zhu et al., 2009).

σt=AEAsεtt(1)
εt=2COLSεrt(2)
ε˙t=0t2COLSεrtdt(3)

where E represents the elastic modulus of the bar material; A represents the cross-sectional area of the bar material; Co represents the longitudinal wave velocity of the bar material, and CO=E/ρ; Ls represents the thickness of the sample; and t represents the stress wave loading time during the test.

The SHPB impact test adheres to the assumption of one - dimensional stress waves. Specifically, it is assumed that the propagation speed of stress waves in each rod remains constant. However, in the experiment, a significant issue arises: low - frequency stress waves propagate at a relatively faster rate compared to high - frequency stress waves. This phenomenon results in oscillations in the stress - strain curves obtained during the experiment. As a consequence, accurately evaluating the mechanical properties of materials becomes challenging, a phenomenon known as the dispersion effect.

To mitigate wave dispersion and maintain a state of constant strain rate deformation in the specimen, a wave shaper made of rubber is affixed to the end of the incident rod where it is struck by the bullet. Moreover, researchers uniformly apply a layer of vaseline at the interface between the specimen and the rods. This vaseline layer serves as a lubricant, effectively reducing the adverse influence of end - friction effects on the experimental results (Wang X. et al., 2022). Simultaneously, the specimens we fabricated have dimensions of Ф70 mm × 35 mm, with the ratio of length to radius being 2:1. This ratio is close to the optimal length - to - diameter ratio (3/2)) for specimens used in SHPB impact tests, enabling the minimization of end - friction effects and inertial effects (Wang X. et al., 2022).

2.3 Experimental design and results

The test involved the selection of five different impact pressure levels, namely, 0.10MPa, 0.13MPa, 0.15MPa, 0.18 MPa and 0.20MPa, for impacting similar specimens of mudstone and siltstone. Each group underwent three replicate experiments. After identifying and excluding outliers, a representative test value was selected from the remaining dataset.

The strain rate at the plateau is determined as the mean strain rate of the rock in this test, when the strain rate-time curve reaches a steady state (Wu J. H. et al., 2024). The data processing method is illustrated in Figure 3, and the final test results are presented in Table 4.

Figure 3
Line graph showing strain rate over time in microseconds. The strain rate peaks at around 400 inverse seconds and gradually decreases. Two vertical red lines mark points labeled \( t_1 \) and \( t_2 \) between 140 and 160 microseconds.

Figure 3. Method of strain rate determination.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The dynamic impact test results of rock-like specimens.

3 Analysis of test results

3.1 Dynamic stress-strain curve analysis

The dynamic stress-strain curve of the weakly cemented rock-like material specimen is depicted in Figure 4. For both mudstone-like material and siltstone-like material, the general trend of the curve follows an initial rise, reaching a peak, and then declining. During the initial stage of stress growth, the majority of curve segments exhibit linear elastic behavior, indicating a certain degree of positive correlation between them. The specimen also attains a state of uniform stress and strain. However, at this juncture, the stress level is insufficient to induce crack expansion in the rock specimen; instead, it can only propagate minimally along existing micro-cracks. The elastic modulus observed during this stage can serve as an appropriate dynamic elastic modulus for mudstone and siltstone. With the escalation of stress, micro-cracks progressively propagate and new cracks emerge, which are not interconnected with the primary cracks, leading to a transition into plastic deformation. As stress continues to intensify, crack propagation accelerates rapidly and microcracks link up with the main crack. During this stage, there is a change in slope on the stress-strain curve indicating a non-linear relationship until reaching peak stress. Subsequently, the slope of the stress-strain curve decreases due to macroscopic failure caused by rock cracking, resulting in diminished load-bearing capacity.

Figure 4
Two graphs depict stress-strain curves for different velocities. Graph (a) shows five curves with velocities ranging from five point seventy-three to fourteen point sixty-four meters per second. Graph (b) displays five additional curves for velocities from seven point seventeen to fourteen point forty meters per second. Stress is measured in megapascal (MPa) and strain is dimensionless. Each curve represents a different velocity with a distinct color and symbol.

Figure 4. Typical dynamic stress-strain curve: (a) mudstone-like material, (b) siltstone-like material.

Compared to the curves of siltstone-like material and mudstone-like material, the stress interval of siltstone-like material is larger, indicating its superior hardness and dynamic impact resistance compared to mudstone. This trend becomes more pronounced with increasing speed. Additionally, the stress flattening stage of mudstone is brief and immediately declines after reaching its peak, whereas siltstone exhibits a prolonged period of stress flattening following the peak. Moreover, the flattening stage in siltstone shows a significant increase and gentler decline compared to that observed in mudstone. These observations can be attributed to the fact that siltstone does not undergo immediate destruction after reaching its stress peak, highlighting its higher yield strength when compared to mudstone.

3.2 Dynamic compressive strength analysis

The dynamic compressive strength of rocks directly reflects their resistance to external impact loads. Figure 5 and Table 5 illustrate the relationship between the dynamic compressive strength of specimens and the strain rate. It is observed that weakly cemented materials tend to harden at higher strain rates, exhibiting exponential growth beyond a certain threshold.

Figure 5
Graph depicting the relationship between stress (MPa) and strain rate (per second) for mudstone and siltstone. Mudstone is represented by squares with a non-linear curve, while siltstone is shown by circles with a linear trend. Stress increases with strain rate for both materials. The x-axis ranges from 100 to 350 s⁻¹, and the y-axis ranges from 0 to 80 MPa.

Figure 5. The relationship between dynamic compressive strength and strain rate.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. The relationship between compressive strength under dynamic loading and strain rate.

The two materials exhibit distinct disparities. The dynamic compressive strength of mudstone demonstrates a gradual and relatively stable growth trend with an increase in strain rate, owing to its soft nature and limited strength. Conversely, siltstone material displays an overall growth pattern that is notably faster, as evidenced by the transition of the relationship function’s B value from negative to positive.

3.3 Energy dissipation relationship analysis

The bullet impacts the incident bar with a specific velocity, resulting in the transfer of impact kinetic energy carried by the bullet, as follows:

Wb=12mv02(4)

where Wb represents the impact kinetic energy of a bullet, J; m represents the mass of the bullet, kg; and v0 represents the impact velocity, m/s.

The energy carried by the incident stress wave is as follows:

W=AeEeCe0tε2tdt(5)

where Ae represents the cross-sectional area of the press bar, m2; Ee represents the elastic modulus of bar; Ce represents the longitudinal wave velocity; and εt represents the strain corresponding to the stress wave during the loading time.

The calculation formula for incident energy WI, transmitted energy WT, and reflected energy WR during the test is as follows:

WI=AeEeCe0tεI2tdt(6)
WR=AeEeCe0tεR2tdt(7)
WT=AeEeCe0tεT2tdt(8)

where εIt represents the incident wave; εRt represents the reflected wave; and εTt represents the transmission wave of strain.

Dissipation energy of the test specimen equals incident wave energy minus reflected and transmitted wave energies, as follows:

WD=WIWR+WT(9)

The incident energy, reflected energy, and dissipated energy of the two rocks were computed using formulas 49, and the corresponding results are presented in Table 6.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Calculation results for the dynamic impact energy of Similar material.

The dissipated energy of rocks exhibits a velocity-dependent effect on impact. As the impact velocity increases, the dissipated energy of rocks also increases. A strong quadratic linear correlation exists between the dissipated energy of mudstone and siltstone and the impact velocity. This can be attributed to the fact that both the development and penetration of internal micro-cracks during specimen impacts require energy consumption, with higher energy consumption observed during crack generation compared to their subsequent development and penetration processes. Consequently, when subjected to low external impacts, minimal energy is generated resulting in tiny cracks within the specimen. At this stage, both absorbed energy by the specimen and its degree of damage remain low. However, as impact velocity rises, so does the generated energy which activates cracks requiring more substantial amounts of energy until complete fracture occurs in specimens (as depicted in Figure 6).

Figure 6
Scatter plot showing dissipated energy in joules versus impact speed in meters per second for siltstone and mudstone. Siltstone data, marked with circles, follows the equation y = 0.28x² - 1.29x + 1.65, with an R² of 0.998. Mudstone data, marked with squares, follows the equation y = 0.35x² - 3.36x + 15.63, also with an R² of 0.998. Red trend lines fit both data sets, indicating similar quadratic relationships.

Figure 6. The relationship between impact velocity and dissipated energy.

3.4 Failure blocks analysis

The failure morphology of the specimen under different impact velocities is illustrated in Figure 7. As can be seen from the figure, the mudstone specimen has been completely broken under the impact pressure of 0.10MPa, with uneven distribution of fragments. The siltstone specimen was completely broken under the impact pressure of 0.13MPa, and the fragment distribution was relatively uniform, which was basically large particle size and larger than mudstone. When the impact pressure increased to 0.18MPa, there were almost no large particle size fragments, and small particle size fragments began to appear in a large area. Compared with mudstone and siltstone, the fragmentation degree of siltstone is stronger than that of mudstone under similar impact strength.

Figure 7
A series of ten images labeled (a) to (j) showing different stages of concrete or dry material fragments scattered on a flat surface. Each image depicts variations in the arrangement and size of the grayish particles, ranging from larger chunks to finer granules. The background is a light color, emphasizing the contrast with the dark material.

Figure 7. The failure patterns of specimens at different impact velocities: (a) Mudstone-like material, p = 0.10MPa, (b) Mudstone-like material, p = 0.13MPa, (c) Mudstone-like material, p = 0.15MPa, (d) Mudstone -like material, p = 0.18MPa, (e) Mudstone -like material, p = 0.20MPa, (f) Siltstone-like material, p = 0.10MPa, (g) Siltstone-like material, p = 0.13MPa, (h) Siltstone-like material, p = 0.15MPa, (i) Siltstone-like material, p = 0.18MPa, (j) Siltstone-like material, p = 0.20 MPa.

The failure mode of rock changes from tensile failure to tension-shear coupling failure with the increase in impact velocity. In order to analyze the impact of velocity on the degree of damage in mudstone and siltstone, a statistical analysis of rock fragments was conducted following the impact test. Building upon Wang Chun’s method (Gao et al., 2024) for measuring rock fragment size, it is noted that when fragmentation is minimal, its statistical significance becomes less pronounced. Therefore, a standard length greater than 35 mm was adopted for broken rock fragments and subsequent counting. The relationship between the number of damaged rock blocks, the maximum length of rock blocks, and the impact velocity is illustrated in Figure 8.

Figure 8
Graph (a) shows dissipated energy in joules against impact speed for mudstone and siltstone, with fitted quadratic equations and high R-squared values. Graph (b) illustrates the maximum length of rock block in millimeters versus impact speed for both materials, also with fitted curves and similar trends.

Figure 8. The relationship among the quantity of damaged rock mass, the maximum length of rock mass, and the impact velocity: (a) Quantity and impact velocity of the damaged rock mass, (b) Maximum length of a rock block and impact velocity.

The analysis of Figure 8 reveals that the number of rock blocks with a block size greater than 35 mm exhibits a quadratic relationship with increasing impact velocity. Simultaneously, the maximum length of broken rock blocks demonstrates a quadratic decrease as impact velocity increases, indicating a reduction in rock failure block size with higher impact velocities. At lower impact speeds, only minimal energy is sufficient to cause slight fragmentation in the rock sample. However, as impact velocity rises, the degree of fragmentation intensifies and multiple occurrences of tensile shear failure result in the formation of macroscopic fracture surfaces. This further enhances the level of fragmentation within the rock samples and ultimately leads to decreased block sizes post-failure.

The fractal characteristics of rocks can provide insights into the fracture mechanism of rocks. To investigate the fracture mechanism of sandstone under varying impact rates, we employed a particle size classification method to conduct an in-depth analysis of the experimental observations. Specifically, we statistically measured the longest edge of broken rock fragments and weighed the accumulated mass of fragments across different particle sizes, establishing a relationship between these two variables. The fragmentation distribution patterns for mudstone and siltstone under different impact velocities are illustrated in Figure 9, while Figure 10 depicts the lnMR/MTlnR curve for a representative rock specimen. Additionally, we calculated the fractal dimension using formulas 10, 11 (Wu J. H. et al., 2024).

b=lnMRMTlnR(10)
D=3b(11)

where b represents the slope of the fitting function in the double logarithmic coordinate system of lnMR/MTlnR; MR represents the particle size less than R accumulated debris quality; MT represents the sample quality; and D represents the fractal dimension of the sample fragments.

Figure 9
Two line graphs compare cumulative mass of fragments with grain diameter at different velocities. Graph (a) shows data with velocities 14.64 m/s, 13.03 m/s, 11.17 m/s, 9.35 m/s, and 5.73 m/s. Graph (b) demonstrates velocities 7.17 m/s, 9.56 m/s, 10.77 m/s, 12.95 m/s, and 14.40 m/s. Higher velocities generally correlate with higher cumulative mass percentages.

Figure 9. The fragmentation distribution of similar material specimens at various impact velocities: (a) Mudstone -like material, (b) Siltstone-like material.

Figure 10
Two graphs labeled (a) and (b) display linear relationships between y (ln(M\(_R\)/M\(_f\))) and x (lnR) for different velocities. Graph (a) shows lines for velocities from 5.73 to 14.64 meters per second, while graph (b) features velocities from 7.17 to 14.40 meters per second. Different symbols and colors represent each velocity. Linear equations are annotated next to each line.

Figure 10. The lnMR/MTlnR curve of similar material specimens: (a) Mudstone -like material, (b) Siltstone-like material.

The fractal dimension of rock fragments increases as a quadratic function with the increase of impact velocity, as shown in Figure 11, indicating that the fragmentation degree of mudstone and siltstone also increases correspondingly. Based on the macroscopic morphology analysis of typical rock breakage under different impact velocities, it can be concluded that higher impact velocities result in increased load and energy absorption by the rock sample, leading to enhanced crushing degree. Therefore, fractal dimension serves as a quantitative index for describing fracture characteristics and reflecting the extent of rock sample fractures. Through advanced drilling sampling and SHPB test analysis, the anticipated fractal dimensions of fractures in the roof rocks across various sections ahead of the roadway can be determined. Subsequently, by differentiating these fractal dimensions, support designs tailored to specific roof sections can be developed. This approach enables a more scientific alignment with the rock mass conditions, thereby achieving an optimal balance between safety and economic efficiency.

Figure 11
Two graphs depict the relationship between impact speed and fractal dimension. Graph (a) shows a quadratic fit with the equation \(y = -0.0037x^2 + 0.13x + 1.57\) and \(R^2 = 0.979\), indicating a slight upward trend. Graph (b) shows a quadratic fit with the equation \(y = 0.11x^2 - 0.18x + 2.46\) and \(R^2 = 0.997\), indicating a more pronounced upward trend. Both graphs use black squares for data points and red lines for fitted curves.

Figure 11. The typical relationship between the fractal dimension and dissipated energy of similar material specimens: (a) Mudstone -like material, (b) Siltstone-like material.

The relationship between the fractal dimension of rock sample fragments and dissipated energy exhibits an exponential pattern, as illustrated in Figure 12. As dissipated energy increases, the fractal dimension of rock progressively rises due to the absorption of energy during crack formation. Moreover, escalating impact velocity intensifies rock damage, necessitating a greater amount of absorbed energy for crack propagation until complete failure.

Figure 12
Two graphs show the relationship between fractal dimension and dissipated energy. Graph (a) depicts a curve fitting the equation \(y=2.68-0.85e^{-0.008x}\) with \(R^2=0.999\). Graph (b) features a curve described by \(y=1.56+0.11e^{0.043x}\) with \(R^2=0.990\). Both graphs use black squares to mark data points and a red line for the fitted curve.

Figure 12. The relationship between the fractal dimension and dissipated energy of similar ma-terial specimens: (a) Mudstone -like material, (b) Siltstone-like material.

4 Conclusion

Based on the comprehensive experimental investigation using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) system and subsequent detailed analyses of mechanical response, failure modes, fragmentation, and energy dissipation, the following principal conclusions are drawn regarding the dynamic behavior of weakly cemented siltstone and mudstone:

(1) The two rock materials exhibit a pronounced strain rate effect, indicating an exponential increase in dynamic compressive strength and strain rate. Moreover, the dynamic compressive property of sandstone is significantly superior to that of mudstone as the strain rate increases. At equivalent impact velocities, mudstone demonstrates greater ductility but lower yield strength compared to siltstone.

(2) Under low strain rates, the rock specimen exhibits splitting failure with a relatively mild degree of failure and maintains certain integrity. Typically, the specimen initially cracks from the side before experiencing complete failure. As the strain rate increases, the failure mode gradually transitions from splitting to crushing failure, resulting in a small but noticeable increase in fragment count. Additionally, siltstone fragments are significantly larger than mudstone materials. The fractal dimension of rock fragments under impact loads follows a quadratic function as impact velocity increases.

(3) With an increase in impact velocity of 9 m/s, the energy dissipation rate of mudstone exhibited a significant rise of 9.3%, from 13.5% to 24.8%. Similarly, the energy dissipation rate of siltstone also experienced a notable increase of 9.1%, from 18.1% to 27.2%.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

GS: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. DY: Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Resources, Project administration. JW: Validation, Writing – review and editing. FM: Data curation, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (Grant No. GXXT-2021-016); the open Foundation of National-local joint Engineering Laboratory of building health monitoring and disaster prevention technology (GG23KF001); the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Anhui University of Science and Technology (13210614); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 41977253).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Chen, S. G., Zhang, H. M., Wang, L., Yuan, C., Meng, X. Z., Yang, G. S., et al. (2022). Experimental study on the impact disturbance damage of weakly cemented rock based on fractal characteristics and energy dissipation regulation. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 122, 103665. doi:10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103665

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, B., Wang, Q., Wang, H., Zong, Q., and Gao, P. (2024). Research on the mechanism and application of wedge cutting blasting with hole-inner delay. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 11383. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-62318-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, G., Xie, H., Gao, M., Xie, J., Li, C., and He, Z. (2023). Fracture mechanisms of competent overburden under high stress conditions: a case study. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56 (3), 1759–1777. doi:10.1007/s00603-022-03169-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, S., Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., and Li, W. (2023a). Dynamic mechanical properties and energy dissipation of frozen weakly cemented red sandstone under high strain rate loading. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 82 (11), 418.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, S. Z., Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., and Li, W. Y. (2023b). Dynamic mechanical properties and energy dissipation of frozen weakly cemented red sandstone under high strain rate loading. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 82 (11), 418. doi:10.1007/s10064-023-03436-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, W., Li, J., Wang, C., and Feng, Y. T. (2024). Numerical investigation of impact fracture behaviors of rocks under confining pressure. Int. J. Fract. 245 (1-2), 37–56. doi:10.1007/s10704-023-00747-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gong, F., Dai, J., and Xu, L. (2023). A strength-stress coupling criterion for rockburst: inspirations from 1114 rockburst cases in 197 underground rock projects. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 142, 105396. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2023.105396

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, Z., Sun, G., and Zhang, G. (2022). Mechanism and inducing factors of rockburst events of roadways under ultrathick strata. Front. Earth Sci. 10. doi:10.3389/feart.2022.860929

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, M. C., Wu, Y. Y., Gao, Y. B., and Tao, Z. G. (2024). Research progress of rock mechanics in deep mining. J. China Coal Soc. 49 (1), 75–99. doi:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1400

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J., He, M., Li, H., Cheng, T., Tao, Z., Liu, D., et al. (2023). Control effect of negative Poisson's ratio (NPR) cable on impact-induced rockburst with different strain rates: an experimental investigation. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56 (7), 5167–5180. doi:10.1007/s00603-023-03324-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, H. P., Gao, F. Q., Xu, G., and Ren, H. W. (2023). Mechanical behaviors of coal measures and ground control technologies for China's deep coal mines - a review. J. Rock Mech. Geotechnical Eng. 15 (1), 37–65. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C. X., Yang, R. S., Zuo, J. J., and Xie, P. (2025). Theory and field tests of innovative cut blasting method for rock roadway excavation, 155, 106180(1). doi:10.1016/j.tust.2024.106180

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S. S., and Yuan, L. (2023). Carbon emission accounting and influencing factors for whole life cycle of coal industry. J. China Coal Soc. 48 (7), 2925–2935. doi:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.CN23.0368

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, Z. Q., Ding, X. H., Liang, M. Z., Li, J. F., Yang, Z. G., Liu, X., et al. (2025). Research on the optimization of optimal blasting parameters and fragmentation control based on coal seam geological conditions. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 12238. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94278-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Liu, Y., Dai, F., and Yan, Z. (2022). Tensile mechanical behavior and fracture characteristics of sandstone exposed to freeze-thaw treatment and dynamic loading. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 226, 107405. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107405

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyu, P., Lu, K., and Chen, X. (2022). Mining stress distribution in stope and overlying rock fracture characteristics and its disaster-pregnant mechanism of coal mine earthquake. Shock Vib. 2022, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2022/7606360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyu, X. F., Lin, X., Wei, O. Y., Wang, N. J., and Zhang, F. R. (2023). Stress wave propagation attenuation law and energy dissipation characteristics of rock-barrier-coal composite specimen under dynamic load. J. Central South Univ. 30 (1), 276–288. doi:10.1007/s11771-023-5234-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, L. D., Han, L. J., Meng, Q. B., Liu, K. X., Tian, M. L., and Zhu, H. X. (2020). Study on characteristic and energy of argillaceous weakly cemented rock under dynamic loading by Hopkinson bar experiment. Energies 13 (12), 3215. doi:10.3390/en13123215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rae, A. S. P., Kenkmann, T., Padmanabha, V., Poelchau, M. H., and Schafer, F. (2020). Dynamic compressive strength and fragmentation in felsic crystalline rocks. J. Geophys. Research-Planets 125 (10). doi:10.1029/2020je006561

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Chen, W., Zhang, H., and Song, L. (2023b). A novel obtaining method and mesoscopic mechanism of pseudo-shear strength parameter evolution of sandstone. Environ. Earth Sci. 82 (2), 60. doi:10.1007/s12665-023-10748-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Chen, W. L., Zhang, H. Q., Li, M., Wang, M. J. W., Lu, P. J., et al. (2023a). Dynamic strength characteristics of fractured rock mass. Eng. Fract. Mech. 292, 109678. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109678

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Chen, W. L., Zhang, H. Q., Zhang, X. P., Song, L., Li, M., et al. (2025). Pull-out characteristics of rock bolts under the influence of “natural” coupled fractures. Comput. Part. Mech. 12, 1389–1409. doi:10.1007/s40571-024-00844-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Zhang, H. Q., Chen, W. L., Song, L., and Li, M. (2024). Pull-out debonding characteristics of rockbolt with prefabricated cracks in rock: a numerical study based on particle flow code. Comput. Part. Mech. 11 (1), 29–53. doi:10.1007/s40571-023-00607-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, L., Yuan, L., Li, Q., Xue, W., Zhu, N., and Liu, Z. (2023). Response characteristics of gas pressure under simultaneous static and dynamic load: implication for coal and gas outburst mechanism. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 33 (2), 155–171. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.11.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, R., Huang, L., Zhi, X., Han, Z., Lai, Y., Li, H., et al. (2022). Damage characteristic of thermal shock on the physical and dynamic compressive properties of granite. Geofluids 2022, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2022/1623883

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, B., Yang, P., Liu, S., and Zeng, S. (2023). Impact dynamic characteristics and constitutive model of granite damaged by cyclic loading. J. Mater. Res. Technology-Jmr&T 24, 333–345. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.047

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, L. H., Ji, H. G., and Yang, B. S. (2019). Physical and mechanical characteristic of rocks with weakly cemented stra-ta in Western representative mining area. J. China Coal Soc. 44 (3), 865–873. doi:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.6039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Y., Song, S., Zhang, X., and Liu, X. (2024). Safety evaluation method of bottom coal thickness in thick coal seam roadway. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 14812. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65708-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C., Cheng, L. P., Tang, L. Z., Wang, W., Liu, T., Wei, Y. H., et al. (2019). Effects of the unloading rate on dynamic characteristic and failure modes of rock under high static loads. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 38 (2), 217–225. doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0954

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Xu, W., Cheng, B., and Zong, Q. (2023). Research on particle size and energy consumption law of hard coal crushing under impact load based on SHPB test. Appl. Sciences-Basel 13 (5), 3298. doi:10.3390/app13053298

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H. P., Li, S. C., Zhang, Q. Y., Li, Y., and Guo, X. H. (2006). Development of a new geomechanical similar material. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 25 (09), 1842–1847. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.09.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Zhu, C. G., Li, X., Wang, B., and Zhang, Y. T. (2024). Experimental study on triaxial disturbance and failure characteristics of rock-like specimens. J. Min. Strata Control Eng. 6 (2), 023034. doi:10.13532/j.jmsce.cn10-1638/td.20240015.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Zuo, T., Li, X., Tao, Z., and Ma, J. (2021). Study on the fractal characteristics of the pomegranate biotite schist under impact loading. Geofluids 2021, 2021–2028. doi:10.1155/2021/1570160

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. M., Liu, L., Zhao, Y. J., Zhang, B., Wang, J. Y., Zhu, M. B., et al. (2022a). New energy exploitation in coal-endowed areas under the target of “double carbon”: a new path for transformation and upgrading of coal mines in the future. Coal Sci. Technol. 51 (1), 59–79. doi:10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-2169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Zhu, Z., Zhou, L., Ma, L., Zhou, C., and Wang, Z. (2022b). Study on the effects of joints orientation and strength on failure behavior in shale specimen under impact loads. Int. J. Impact Eng. 163, 104162. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104162

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wen, S., Huang, R., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X. (2023). Mechanical behavior and failure mechanism of composite layered rocks under dynamic tensile loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 170, 105533. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105533

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H., Fan, A., Zheng, Z., Wang, M., Li, S., Zhang, B., et al. (2023). Dynamic mechanical properties and failure behaviors of brittle rock materials with a tunnel-shaped opening subjected to impact loads. J. Mater. Res. Technology-Jmr&T 25, 3285–3297. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J. H., Du, Y. X., Wang, C. B., and Zong, Q. (2024b). Experimental study on dynamic tensile mechanical behavior and fracture mechanical characteristics of sandstone with a single prefabricated fissure. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2024, 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/5501703

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J. Y., Wong, H. S., Zhang, H., Yin, Q., Jing, H. W., and Ma, D. (2024a). Improvement of cemented rockfill by premixing low-alkalinity activator and fly ash for recycling gangue and partially replacing cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 145, 105345. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105345

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J. Y., Yang, S., Williamson, M., Wong, H. S., Bhudia, T., Pu, H., et al. (2025). Microscopic mechanism of cellulose nanofibers modified cemented gangue backfill materials. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 8, 177. doi:10.1007/s42114-025-01270-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, K., Yu, Y., Wu, B., and Yao, W. (2023). Correction of dynamic Brazilian disc tensile strength of rocks under preloading conditions considering the overload phenomenon and invoking the Griffith criterion. J. Rock Mech. Geotechnical Eng. 15 (8), 1986–1996. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, H. P., Lu, J., Li, C. B., Li, M. H., and Gao, M. Z. (2022). Experimental study on the mechanical and failure behaviors of deep rock subjected to true triaxial stress: a review. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 32 (5), 915–950. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.05.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, R. S., Li, C. X. ; C. J., Zou, Fe. Y., Wang, Y. B., Xiao, C. L., and Zhang, Z. R. (2023). Development history and new technology research progress of rock roadway blasting excavation in coal mines in China. Coal Sci. Technol. 51 (1), 224–241. doi:10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-1804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Ning, J., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Shi, X., and Qu, X. (2024). Determination of critical energy for coal impact fracture under coupled static-dynamic loading. Eng. Fail. Anal. 160, 108222. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108222

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, Z., Wang, C., Chen, Z., Cao, Y., Yang, T., Chen, D., et al. (2024). Study on mechanical response characteristics of anchor under dynamic disturbance. Archives Min. Sci., 69(1), 141–154. doi:10.24425/ams.2024.149833

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

You, W., Dai, F., Liu, Y., and Yan, Z. (2022). Effect of confining pressure and strain rate on mechanical behaviors and failure characteristics of sandstone containing a pre-existing flaw. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 55 (4), 2091–2109. doi:10.1007/s00603-022-02772-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, P., Zheng, X. B., Wei, N. N., and Li, A. B. (2024). Effect of impact loading and acidic drying-wetting cycles on fragmentation and energy dissipation characteristics of sandstone. Environ. Earth Sci. 83 (22), 632. doi:10.1007/s12665-024-11935-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Q., Wang, L., Xie, G., Gu, S., Khan, N. M., Jiao, Z., et al. (2022). Evaluation of the energy consumption and fractal characteristics of different length-diameter ratios of coal under dynamic impact. Energies 15 (15), 5498. doi:10.3390/en15155498

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, X., Tu, M., Li, Y., Chang, G., and Li, C. (2022). Stability and cementation of the surrounding rock in roof-cutting and pressure-relief entry under mining influence. Energies 15 (3), 951. doi:10.3390/en15030951

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q. H., Yuan, L., Yang, K., Xue, J. H., and Duan, C. R. (2019). Mechanism analysis on continuous stress-relief mining for preventing coal and rock dynamic disasters in deep coal mines. J. Min. and Saf. Eng. 36 (1), 80–86+102. doi:10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2019.01.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Liu, Z. G., Chang, S., Xue, Y. L., and Zhang, J. Y. (2025). Study on damage characteristics and fracture mechanisms of coal under high stress environment during blasting. Eng. Fract. Mech. 314, 110772. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110772

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Qian, Q., Wang, H., Huang, Y., Wang, J., and Liu, H. (2021). Study on the dynamic mechanical properties of metamorphic limestone under impact loading. Lithosphere 2021 (Special 4), 8403502. doi:10.2113/2021/8403502

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, H. B., Zhang, B., Gao, L., Jing, S. J., and Cheng, H. (2025). Static blasting roof cutting surrounding rock control technology for narrow coal pillar gob-side entry driving in thick coal seams. Int. J. Geomechanics 25 (6). doi:10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10861

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Z., Xue, J., Jin, J., Tan, L., Xia, W., and Cai, R. (2023). Experimental research on the dynamic constringent characteristics and fractal properties of sandstone under impact loading. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 18, e02174. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02174

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Q., Qian, J., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., and Zhang, S. (2024a). Velocity tomography of cross-sectional damage evolution along rock longitudinal direction under uniaxial loading. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 143, 105503.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Q., Xu, Y., Yin, Z., Wang, F., and Zhang, H. (2023). Dynamic tensile behaviour under impact loading for rocks damaged by static precompression. Archives Civ. Mech. Eng. 23 (3), 199. doi:10.1007/s43452-023-00748-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Q. Q., Li, P. F., Xu, Y., Cheng, B., Hu, H., Shi, H., et al. (2025). Crack propagation and CT imaging of internal cracks in rocks damaged by pre-compression under explosive loading. Ain Shams Eng. J. 16 (3), 103302. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2025.103302

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Q. Q., Qian, J. W., Zhang, H. J., Chen, Y. K., and Zhang, S. H. (2024b). Velocity tomography of cross-sectional damage evolution along rock longitudinal direction under uniaxial loading. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 143, 105503. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2023.105503

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Xu, W. S., Zhao, G. M., Meng, X. r., Li, Y. M., Wu, X. k., et al. (2022c). Energy evolution law and fractal characteristics of different rock specimen sizes on dynamic compression. Geofluids 2022, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2022/5339603

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, K., Dou, L., Li, X., Song, S., Cao, J., Bai, J. Z., et al. (2022a). Coal burst and mining-induced stress evolution in a deep isolated main entry area - a case study. Eng. Fail. Anal. 137, 106289. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106289

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, T., Han, Z., Li, D., and Chen, J. (2022b). Experimental study of the mechanical and fracture behavior of flawed sandstone subjected to coupled static-repetitive impact loading. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 117, 103161. doi:10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103161

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, J., Hu, S., and Wang, L. (2009). An analysis of stress uniformity for concrete-like specimens during SHPB tests. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36 (1), 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuo, T., Li, X., Wang, J., Hu, Q., Tao, Z., and Hu, T. (2024). Insights into natural tuff as a building material: effects of natural joints on fracture fractal characteristics and energy evolution of rocks under impact load. Eng. Fail. Anal. 163, 108584. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108584

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuo, T., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Li, X., Tao, Z., and Yang, C. (2022). Analysis of dynamic damage fractal and energy consumption characteristics of dolomite marble. Shock Vib. 2022, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2022/9440222

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: weakly consolidated rock, strain rate effect, dynamic response, energy dissipation, fractal characteristic

Citation: Shi G, Yao D, Wu J and Meng F (2025) Experimental study on dynamic characteristics and energy dissipation of weakly cemented rock-like materials. Front. Mater. 12:1629892. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1629892

Received: 16 May 2025; Accepted: 06 June 2025;
Published: 10 September 2025.

Edited by:

Jiangyu Wu, China University of Mining and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Guojian Liu, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, China
Syahrul Fithry Senin, Universiti Teknologi Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Copyright © 2025 Shi, Yao, Wu and Meng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Duoxi Yao, ZHh5YW9AYXVzdC5lZHUuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.