EDITORIAL article

Front. Mater., 14 July 2025

Sec. Environmental Degradation of Materials

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1656559

Editorial: Advances in microbiologically influenced corrosion and new intelligent biomaterials design

  • 1. Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China

  • 2. National Materials Corrosion and Protection Data Center, Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China

  • 3. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

  • 4. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China

  • 5. BRI Southeast Asia Network for Corrosion and Protection (MOE), Shunde Innovation School, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Foshan, China

In critical fields such as marine engineering, energy pipelines, shipbuilding, and biomedical applications, the long-term service reliability of materials is increasingly challenged by complex microbial environments (). Particularly under high-humidity, nutrient-rich microecological conditions, surfaces are prone to the formation of complex biofilm structures, thereby initiating microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) and accelerating localized failure of metallic materials (; ). It is estimated that MIC accounts for more than 20% of the total corrosion-related losses worldwide (). This form of corrosion not only increases maintenance and replacement costs but also poses serious risks to environmental safety and human health.

MIC is essentially a typical interfacial, multifactorial corrosion process influenced by a synergistic combination of factors, including material type, microbial community composition, biofilm metabolic activity, and the local electrochemical environment (; ; ). Representative anaerobic microorganisms such as sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can secrete hydrogen sulfide or form conductive biofilms that directly interfere with electron transfer at the metal interface, inducing anodic dissolution and passivation film breakdown (; ; ). Welikala et al. demonstrated that under nutrient-rich conditions, SRB form compact nodular biofilms on steel surfaces, which lead to irregular pitting; under nutrient-deficient conditions, bacterial adhesion increases due to the demand for electrons from the metal, intensifying interfacial electrochemical heterogeneity and accelerating overall corrosion. further revealed that under eutrophic seawater conditions, pitting depth on copper surfaces increased significantly, reaching up to 17.8 μm-1.8 times that under nutrient-deficient conditions. Although biofilm thickness was lower in poor media, enhanced adhesion due to starvation-induced stress expanded the electrochemical heterogeneity, highlighting a metabolism-driven corrosion mechanism (M-MIC).

In recent years, extracellular electron transfer (EET)-mediated corrosion mechanisms have attracted growing attention, particularly in studies of electroactive bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and SRB (; ). reported that overexpression of phzH in P. aeruginosa led to denser biofilm formation on 2205 duplex stainless steel, with increased phenazine (PCN) secretion promoting H2O2 generation and accelerating the dissolution of Cr2O3 passive films. This resulted in a corrosion current density of 189 nA/cm2 and a pitting depth of 4.2 μm, indicating that phzH modulates the coupling between EET activity and passive film degradation. Similarly, ) demonstrated that in riboflavin-rich environments, Desulfovibrio ferrophilus IS5 utilized riboflavin as an electron mediator to significantly accelerate Fe (0) oxidation and sulfate reduction, raising corrosion current density by 63% and reducing polarization resistance by 31% within hours. The corrosion rate increased from 1.03 to 1.57 mm/year, suggesting that microbial metabolic activity and electron transfer capability, rather than biomass alone, predominantly dictate corrosion behavior.

Although conventional biocides such as quaternary ammonium compounds, glutaraldehyde, and DCOIT are widely employed for MIC control in industrial systems, their effectiveness remains limited by several factors (; ; ). Biofilms act as a physical barrier that significantly impairs biocide diffusion and activity. Moreover, microbial resistance to chemical biocides is continuously increasing, resulting in reduced protection duration. Many of these compounds also exhibit environmental toxicity and bioaccumulation potential, conflicting with sustainable development goals. As such, the development of high-performance, environmentally benign, and stimuli-responsive “smart biomaterials” has emerged as a promising direction for MIC mitigation.

Recent advances have introduced novel materials—including natural antimicrobial peptides, biomimetic polypeptides, responsive polymers, and nanostructured coatings—into the MIC protection field. For instance, developed a chiral metal-organic framework (MOF) coating incorporating d-amino acids, Cu2+ ions, and nanostructures to achieve a synergistic “biofilm dispersion–chemical disruption–physical damage” mechanism. Their system reduced viable Gram-positive/negative cell counts by over 4.5 log, increased mature biofilm destruction by 1.6 log, and decreased algal adhesion by 77.8%. Pang et al. demonstrated that polyaspartic acid (PASP) and D-phenylalanine formed a dense protective film on carbon steel, suppressing SRB adhesion and reducing corrosion current density to 0.530 × 10−7 A/cm2, with pit depth reductions approaching 90%. Yang et al. employed a hydrogel copolymer of SBMA and HEMA loaded with D-amino acids and gentamicin to enhance anti-biofilm efficacy, achieving over 90% inhibition by targeting both bacterial wall integrity and metabolic activity. synthesized the peptide Tcs, which significantly enhanced THPS efficacy under SRB-rich conditions, reducing corrosion current density to 0.18–0.19 μA/cm2 and lowering corrosion rates by 90% through a synergistic cationic–hydrophobic action. Xu et al. observed severe pitting (>375 μm) on 13Cr steel in seawater in the presence of D. ferrophilus IS5; however, co-application of green biocide THPS and dispersive peptide A effectively disrupted biofilm structure and reduced surface corrosion current by over 90%, demonstrating a “disperse–penetrate–kill” strategy applicable to both marine steels and copper alloys. Additionally, self-healing polymer networks and sensor coatings capable of responding to microbial metabolites (e.g., pH, H2S) offer promising avenues for intelligent, real-time corrosion monitoring and protection (; ; ; ; ).

This study aims to explore the interdisciplinary frontier between microbiologically influenced corrosion and the development of novel intelligent biomaterials. By leveraging insights from corrosion electrochemistry, biomaterials science, microbial ecology, and interfacial engineering, this work seeks to advance material strategies from passive resistance to active prevention and smart feedback, thereby laying the theoretical and technological foundation for the next-generation of MIC-resistant materials.

Statements

Author contributions

WD: Writing – original draft. NX: Writing – original draft. YL: Writing – review and editing, Investigation. JH: Writing – review and editing, Investigation. XH: Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52201062), National Key Research and Development Programs (No. 2022YFB3808803) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021B1515130009).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AnandkumarB.GeorgeR. P.MaruthamuthuS.ParvathavarthiniN.MudaliU. K. (2016). Corrosion characteristics of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and the role of molecular biology in SRB studies: an overview. Corros. Rev.34, 4163. 10.1515/corrrev-2015-0055

  • 2

    BekasD. G.TsirkaK.BaltzisD.PaipetisA. S. (2016). Self-healing materials: a review of advances in materials, evaluation, characterization and monitoring techniques. Compos. Part B Eng.87, 92119. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.057

  • 3

    ChughB.SheetalS.SinghM.ThakurS.PaniB.SinghA. K.et al (2022). Extracellular electron transfer by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biocorrosion: a review. ACS Biomaterials Sci. Eng.8, 10491059. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01645

  • 4

    DouW.JiaR.JinP.LiuJ.ChenS.GuT. (2018). Investigation of the mechanism and characteristics of copper corrosion by sulfate reducing bacteria. Corros. Sci.144, 237248. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.055

  • 5

    DouW.LiuJ.CaiW.WangD.JiaR.ChenS.et al (2019). Electrochemical investigation of increased carbon steel corrosion via extracellular electron transfer by a sulfate reducing bacterium under carbon source starvation. Corros. Sci.150, 258267. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.02.005

  • 6

    FuJ.ChenT.WangM.YangN.LiS.WangY.et al (2013). Acid and alkaline dual stimuli-responsive mechanized hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles as smart nanocontainers for intelligent anticorrosion coatings. Acs Nano7, 1139711408. 10.1021/nn4053233

  • 7

    JiaR.UnsalT.XuD.LekbachY.GuT. (2019). Microbiologically influenced corrosion and current mitigation strategies: a state of the art review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.137, 4258. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.11.007

  • 8

    JonesI. A.JoshiL. T. (2021). Biocide use in the antimicrobial era: a review. Molecules26, 2276. 10.3390/molecules26082276

  • 9

    KardarP.YariH.MahdavianM.RamezanzadehB. (2016). “Smart self-healing polymer coatings: mechanical damage repair and corrosion prevention,” in Industrial applications for intelligent polymers and coatings. Editors HosseiniM.MakhloufA. S. H. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 511535.

  • 10

    KuklinskiA.SandW. (2014). “Microbiologically influenced corrosion,” in Encyclopedia of applied electrochemistry (Springer), 12761290. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6996-5_528

  • 11

    LuS.ZhuH.SunJ.GuT.XueN.ChenS.et al (2024). Eutrophication of seawater intensified biocorrosion of copper caused by Desulfovibrio vulgaris biofilm. J. Mater. Sci. Technol.194, 110123. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.031

  • 12

    Machuca SuarezL. (2019). Understanding and addressing microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC). Corros. Mater.44, 8896.

  • 13

    NiX.GaoY.ZhangX.LeiY.SunG.YouB. (2021). An eco-friendly smart self-healing coating with NIR and pH dual-responsive superhydrophobic properties based on biomimetic stimuli-responsive mesoporous polydopamine microspheres. Chem. Eng. J.406, 126725. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126725

  • 14

    QianH.XuD.DuC.ZhangD.LiX.HuangL.et al (2017). Dual-action smart coatings with a self-healing superhydrophobic surface and anti-corrosion properties. J. Mater. Chem. A5, 23552364. 10.1039/c6ta10903a

  • 15

    ShiX.XieN.GongJ. (2011). Recent progress in the research on microbially influenced corrosion: a bird's eye view through the engineering lens. Recent Pat. Corros. Sci.1, 118131. 10.2174/1877610811101020118

  • 16

    SinghA. K. (2020). Microbially induced corrosion and its mitigation. Springer.

  • 17

    SunJ.LuS.ChengM.XueN.ChenS.LiuG.et al (2025). Novel peptides based on sea squirt as biocide enhancers to mitigate biocorrosion of EH36 steel. Bioelectrochemistry163, 108890. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2024.108890

  • 18

    TelegdiJ.ShabanA.TrifL. (2020). Review on the microbiologically influenced corrosion and the function of biofilms. Int. J. Corros. Scale Inhibition9, 133.

  • 19

    TripathiA. K.ThakurP.SaxenaP.RauniyarS.GopalakrishnanV.SinghR. N.et al (2021). Gene sets and mechanisms of sulfate-reducing bacteria biofilm formation and quorum sensing with impact on corrosion. Front. Microbiol.12, 754140. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.754140

  • 20

    WangD.KijklaP.MohamedM. E.SalehM. A.KumseraneeS.PunprukS.et al (2021). Aggressive corrosion of carbon steel by Desulfovibrio ferrophilus IS5 biofilm was further accelerated by riboflavin. Bioelectrochemistry142, 107920. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107920

  • 21

    WangD.ZhouE.XuD.LovleyD. R. (2023). Burning question: are there sustainable strategies to prevent microbial metal corrosion?Microb. Biotechnol.16, 20262035. 10.1111/1751-7915.14347

  • 22

    WangJ.DuM.LiG.ShiP. (2022). Research progress on microbiological inhibition of corrosion: a review. J. Clean. Prod.373, 133658. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133658

  • 23

    XuD.GuT.LovleyD. R. (2023). Microbially mediated metal corrosion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.21, 705718. 10.1038/s41579-023-00920-3

  • 24

    YuZ.LiX.WangZ.FanY.ZhaoW.LiD.et al (2024). Robust chiral metal–organic framework coatings for self-activating and sustainable biofouling mitigation. Adv. Mater.36, 2407409. 10.1002/adma.202407409

  • 25

    ZhouE.ZhangM.HuangY.LiH.WangJ.JiangG.et al (2022). Accelerated biocorrosion of stainless steel in marine water via extracellular electron transfer encoding gene phzH of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Water Res.220, 118634. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118634

Summary

Keywords

microbiologically influenced corrosion, antifouling, biomedical application, biomass, intelligent coating, biomaterials

Citation

Dou W, Xue N, Lou Y, Hu J and Hao X (2025) Editorial: Advances in microbiologically influenced corrosion and new intelligent biomaterials design. Front. Mater. 12:1656559. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1656559

Received

30 June 2025

Accepted

03 July 2025

Published

14 July 2025

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Guang-Ling Song, Southern University of Science and Technology, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xiangping Hao,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics