Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Mater., 18 July 2025

Sec. Biomaterials and Bio-Inspired Materials

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1656768

This article is part of the Research TopicBioactive Coatings: Advancing Bone Implant Performance and LongevityView all 5 articles

Editorial: Bioactive coatings: advancing bone implant performance and longevity

  • 1Department of Plasma Physics and Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
  • 2Laboratoire de Mécanique Matériaux et Procédés (LMMP), Ecole Nationale Supérieure D’Ingénieurs de Tunis, Université de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
  • 3Institut de Thermique, Mécanique et Matériaux (ITheMM), EA 7548, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA), Reims, France

The field of advanced thin films and coatings for bone implants is gaining significant attention due to the increasing demand for innovative solutions in orthopaedic and dental surgeries (Alluhaidan et al., 2024; Bertrand et al., 2023). As the global population ages, there is a pressing need for bone implants that not only replace or repair bone tissue functions but also possess enhanced properties and extended lifespans (Gheno et al., 2012; Li et al., 2017). These implants must exhibit specific biological, chemical, and mechanical characteristics to ensure optimal interaction with the surrounding tissues (Williams, 2022; Furko, 2025). Recent studies have focused on the development of bioactive thin films and coatings that support bone cell growth and promote a strong bond with bone tissues (Ali et al., 2021; Dhiflaoui et al., 2024; Ciobanu et al., 2025). Various deposition methods can be used to produce them (Akhtar et al., 2022; Heimann, 2024; Drevet et al., 2019).

This Research Topic aims to explore the development and application of advanced thin films and coatings to improve the osseointegration and overall performance of bone implants. The primary objectives include investigating the effectiveness of different coating methods, understanding the interaction between coatings and bone tissues, and enhancing the biological and mechanical properties of implants. Four articles have been published to present the latest achievements in the field and the next challenges to produce a new generation of innovative bioactive coatings.

In their article, Balasubramani et al. describe biocompatible composite coatings made of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), pectin, gelatine, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). They study the impact of different concentrations in each material (Balasubramani et al.). The composite coatings are deposited on a cortical titanium bone screw by dip coating. The results show enhanced biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, anti-inflammatory activities, and bone cell growth that are relevant for bone implant applications.

In another article, Lanzino et al. produced thin GB14 coatings on a titanium substrate by high velocity suspension flame spraying (HVSFS). GB14 is a calcium alkali orthophosphate ceramic (Ca2KNa(PO4)2) deposited on titanium implants to promote bone regeneration. The authors describe the effect of different experimental parameters on the coating properties (Lanzino et al.). The optimized coatings are uniform, porous, rough, hard, biocompatible, and promote bone cell growth.

Kloster et al. studied composite coatings made of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibers containing bioactive glass microparticles (Kloster et al.). These coatings are deposited by electrospinning on stainless steel wires used for bone repair. In addition, amoxicillin-loaded Eudragit® nanofibers are co-electrospun to impart a pH-selective release behavior against bacterial infection. The obtained composite coating promotes biocompatibility and osseointegration, releasing amoxicillin in a physiological environment in the pH range where infection is likely to occur.

The article by Liu et al. describes a baicalin-containing saline solution used to store titanium implants for 4 weeks (Liu et al.). They studied the impact of three different concentrations of baicalin and compared the results to those obtained for titanium stored in air or a baicalin-free solution. Baicalin is an organic compound extracted from the root of the Chinese herb named Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (Labiatae), known for relevant biomedical properties. They characterized the titanium surfaces after storage and observed enhancement in the proliferation of osteoblasts due to the presence of baicalin in the storage solution.

These studies underscore the importance of continued exploration of low-temperature deposition methods to enhance the biological and mechanical properties of biomaterials. This research addresses key questions about optimizing bioactive coatings for better osseointegration, effective incorporation of organic components, and understanding how different materials and coatings influence the long-term success of bone implants. In summary, this Research Topic illustrates significant progress towards producing a new generation of innovative bioactive coatings, essential for improving the performance and longevity of bone implants. Future directions of this Research Topic include the development of multifunctional smart coatings with enhanced biocompatibility and functionality. Controlled drug release and targeted tissue regeneration are major objectives in the field with the aim of developing a personalized care plan for each patient. The next-generation of bioactive coatings deposited at low temperature will be designed to deliver therapeutic agents such as antibiotics and growth factors after implantation.

Author contributions

RD: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. HD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. HB: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Akhtar, M., Uzair, S. A., Rizwan, M., and Ur Rehman, M. A. (2022). The improvement in surface properties of metallic implant via magnetron sputtering: recent progress and remaining challenges. Front. Mater. 8, 747169. doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.747169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ali, A., Ikram, F., Iqbal, F., Fatima, H., Mehmood, A., Kolawole, M. Y., et al. (2021). Improving the in vitro degradation, mechanical and biological properties of AZ91-3Ca Mg alloy via hydrothermal calcium phosphate coatings. Front. Mater. 8, 715104. doi:10.3389/fmats.2021.715104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alluhaidan, T., Qaw, M., Garcia, I. M., Montoya, C., Orrego, S., and Melo, M. A. (2024). Seeking endurance: designing smart dental composites for tooth restoration. Designs 8, 92. doi:10.3390/designs8050092

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertrand, E., Zankovic, S., Vinke, J., Schmal, H., and Seidenstuecker, M. (2023). About the mechanical strength of calcium phosphate cement scaffolds. Designs 7, 87. doi:10.3390/designs7040087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciobanu, C. S., Predoi, D., Iconaru, S. L., Rokosz, K., Raaen, S., Negrila, C. C., et al. (2025). Chrome doped hydroxyapatite enriched with amoxicillin layers for biomedical applications. Coatings 15, 233. doi:10.3390/coatings15020233

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhiflaoui, H., Zayani, W., Chayoukhi, S., boumnijel, I., Faure, J., Khezami, L., et al. (2024). Enhanced mechanical, corrosion, and tribological properties of hydroxyapatite coatings for orthopedic and dental applications. Ceram. Int. 50 (21C), 43383–43396. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.08.189

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drevet, R., Fauré, J., Sayen, S., Marle-Spiess, M., El Btaouri, H., and Benhayoune, H. (2019). Electrodeposition of biphasic calcium phosphate coatings with improved dissolution properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 236, 121797. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121797

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Furko, M. (2025). Bioglasses Versus bioactive calcium phosphate derivatives as advanced ceramics in tissue engineering: comparative and comprehensive study, current trends, and innovative solutions. J. Funct. Biomater. 16, 161. doi:10.3390/jfb16050161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gheno, R., Cepparo, J. M., Rosca, C. E., and Cotton, A. (2012). Musculoskeletal disorders in the elderly. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2, 39. doi:10.4103/2156-7514.99151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heimann, R. B. (2024). Plasma-sprayed osseoconductive hydroxylapatite coatings for endoprosthetic hip implants: phase composition, microstructure, properties, and biomedical functions. Coatings 14, 787. doi:10.3390/coatings14070787

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Thabane, L., Papaioannou, A., Ioannidis, G., Levine, M. A. H., and Adachi, J. D. (2017). An overview of osteoporosis and frailty in the elderly. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 18, 46. doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1403-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, D. F. (2022). Biocompatibility pathways and mechanisms for bioactive materials: the bioactivity zone. Bioact. Mater. 10, 306–322. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biomaterials, coatings, bone implant, biocompatibility, bioactivity, hard tissue repair, bioceramics, biopolymers

Citation: Drevet R, Dhiflaoui H and Benhayoune H (2025) Editorial: Bioactive coatings: advancing bone implant performance and longevity. Front. Mater. 12:1656768. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1656768

Received: 30 June 2025; Accepted: 11 July 2025;
Published: 18 July 2025.

Edited and reviewed by:

Hafiz M. N. Iqbal, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESM), Mexico

Copyright © 2025 Drevet, Dhiflaoui and Benhayoune. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Richard Drevet, ZHJldmV0QG1haWwubXVuaS5jeg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.