SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1462131

Current Status and Influencing Factors of Enteral Nutrition Interruption Among Critical Patients: A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
Xiaoyan  LuXiaoyan Lu1Xin  WangXin Wang1Jianzheng  CaiJianzheng Cai1Yongzhi  CaoYongzhi Cao2*Yuyu  WangYuyu Wang2*Weixia  YuWeixia Yu1Limi  DanLimi Dan1Qingling  WangQingling Wang1
  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Liaoning Province, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and elucidated the current status and key determinants of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI) in critically ill patients. By shedding light on these factors, we aimed to furnish compelling evidence to mitigate the occurrence of ENI in this critical setting.We embarked on a comprehensive search across seven prominent databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCO, and Ovid Medline, spanning from their inception to May 27, 2024. Two independent researchers meticulously screened and assessed the quality of the literature, extracting data on the current status and influencing factors of ENI. This rigorous approach culminated in a descriptive systematic review and analysis. Result: From an initial pool of 2,984 studies, 28 were deemed suitable for inclusion in this review, comprising 20 crosssectional and eight cohort studies. Moreover, 16 studies highlighted ENI incidence rates ranging from 4.7% to a staggering 100%, with an overall average of 48.3%. Among 17 studies, a total of 4,890 ENI episodes were reported involving 2,008 critically ill patients, translating to an average of 2 to 3 episodes per patient. Four studies detailed the cumulative ENI duration in 327 critically ill patients, totaling 11,037.2 hours, with an individual average of 33.8 hours per patient. The analysis revealed four primary factors influencing ENI: procedures, gastrointestinal events, feeding tube problems, and hemodynamic instability. Procedures accounted for 29.8% to 85.0% of ENI frequency and 34.6% to 81.2% of duration, with averages of 63.4% and 52.1%, respectively. Gastrointestinal events contributed to 9.4% to 59.7% of ENI frequency and 11.5% to 21.4% of duration, averaging 19.2% and 18.1%. Feeding tube problems ranged from 0.9% to 29.3% in frequency and 1.3% to 25.6% in duration, with averages of 9.3% and 11.6%. Hemodynamic instability was responsible for 0.9% to 20.0% of ENI frequency and 1.1% to 5.1% of duration, averaging 3.9% and 2.6%.The incidence and frequency of ENI in critically ill patients are notably high, with interruptions lasting for extended durations. The primary culprits, procedures, gastrointestinal events, feeding tube problems, and hemodynamic instability, influenced ENI occurrence.

Keywords: Intensive Care, Enteral nutrition interruption, current status, Influencing factors, Systematic review

Received: 09 Jul 2024; Accepted: 04 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lu, Wang, Cai, Cao, Wang, Yu, Dan and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yongzhi Cao, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
Yuyu Wang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.