Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets

This article is part of the Research TopicCereals, Pseudocereals and Pulses: Nutritional Features and Functional Food DevelopmentView all 3 articles

U.S. Consumer Acceptance of Whole Grains, Local Grains, and Alternative Grain Networks: A scoping review

Provisionally accepted
Rebekah  SchulzRebekah Schulz*Hikaru  PetersonHikaru PetersonHallie  LundquistHallie LundquistMegan  KocherMegan KocherLen  MarquartLen Marquart
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Whole grains, including pseudocereals, provide a dual benefit: they support human health and disease prevention and strengthen agronomic and ecosystem functions through crop rotations. Despite numerous epidemiological and intervention studies indicating their health promotion and disease prevention benefits, however, only one percent of U.S. children and eight percent of U.S. adults meet actual whole grain intake recommendations. Recently, alternative grain networks as a type of grain system are emerging in the U.S., with a vision of offering local grain products to consumers not only for their benefit but also for that of the entire grain value chain. The aim of this scoping review is to map existing literature on U.S. consumer acceptance of whole grains, local grains, and alternative grain networks, define knowledge gaps, and make recommendations for future research. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically screened 14,155 articles, 32 of which met our inclusion criteria. The included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, spanning randomized control trials, surveys, observational studies, and qualitative methodologies. The studies examined whole grains, bread, organic grain products, local grain products, and specific grain products. Due to most of the included studies' focus on whole grains, the main focus of the scoping review is on whole grains. Collectively, the studies most frequently reported on the following key factors impacting consumer acceptance of whole grains: taste, price, knowledge, familiarity, attitude, and income/food insecurity. Many of the identified barriers and drivers to whole grain intake were similar to those in most other countries. Three articles examined consumer acceptance of alternative grain networks and local grain products. These articles, all using a qualitative, case study methodology, indicated that a select segment of consumers are interested in these systems and products, without quantitative measurement of consumer acceptance. The results of this scoping review suggest that educational campaigns such as those focused on whole grain identification, whole and local grain health and environmental benefits, preparation techniques and recipes, community cooking classes and sampling events, and policy and research advances along the grain supply chain could aid in promoting consumer acceptance of whole grains, local grains, and alternative grain networks.

Keywords: alternative grain networks, consumer acceptance, Consumers, local grain economies, local grains, regional grain networks, Whole-grains

Received: 27 Oct 2025; Accepted: 15 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Schulz, Peterson, Lundquist, Kocher and Marquart. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rebekah Schulz

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.