Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Nutr., 10 February 2026

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 13 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1773578

This article is part of the Research TopicNutritional Epidemiology: Advances in the Analysis of Healthy and Sustainable Dietary PatternsView all 11 articles

Editorial: Nutritional epidemiology: advances in the analysis of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns

  • 1Department of Public Health, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
  • 2Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nutrition and Dietetics, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
  • 3Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty Health Science and Food, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile
  • 4Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Subregional Office for Mesoamerica, Panama City, Panama

There is growing interest in healthy, sustainable dietary patterns and food system transformation due to the intersection of human health, social equity, and environmental sustainability. Healthy diets not only prevent chronic diseases but also modulate mechanisms of biological aging and metabolic function through pathways involving lipid metabolism, body composition, and systemic inflammation. The studies presented in this Research Topic address these dimensions from a multidimensional perspective, integrating metabolic and microbiome biomarkers with ecological and social indices that assess the sustainability of food systems.

Chen et al. demonstrated that higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was associated with a lower risk of sarcopenia. This relationship is partially mediated by an improved lipid profile, highlighting the potential of sustainable diets to preserve muscle mass and support metabolic health across the lifespan. Similarly, Wei et al. showed that adherence to healthy dietary patterns, such as AHEI, DASH, or MEDI, was associated with slower biological aging and a lower risk of kidney stones, underscoring that overall diet quality can directly influence physiological processes related to longevity.

Furthermore, Liu et al. and Long et al. presented compelling evidence that the gut microbiota serves as a key mediator between diet, metabolism, and cardiovascular health, drawing on the newly developed Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM). Both studies reported that greater microbial diversity, reflecting better dietary quality, was inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome, with BMI emerging as an essential mediator. These findings position the DI-GM as an innovative dietary biomarker that integrates metabolic health and dietary sustainability by modulating the gut microbiota.

The environmental dimension of dietary sustainability also occupies a central place in this Research Topic. Conrad et al. modeled the ecological impacts of replacing different protein sources among U.S. adults. They reported that replacing beef with pork markedly reduced greenhouse gas emissions and land use, whereas substituting legumes or poultry with pork increased environmental impacts. Recent evidence highlights the critical role of aquatic foods, particularly fish and seafood, in advancing both human and planetary health (4). These findings reveal that sustainability outcomes depend on the type of food substitution, emphasizing the need for more precise food policies that balance health and environmental goals.

Complementarily, Contreras-Núñez et al.. developed the Sustainability Diet Index (S-DI), a multicriteria decision analysis tool applied to institutional menus that integrates the nutritional, environmental, and social dimensions of food choices. This tool demonstrated that menus containing local ingredients and a lower proportion of animal-based foods achieved the highest sustainability scores. The S-DI thus emerges as a practical framework for translating sustainability principles into the culinary field and collective food services. In addition, the updated EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems report says that healthy and sustainable diets should be predominantly plant-based, but with flexibility to include moderate amounts of animal-sourced foods, such as fish, dairy, and eggs, according to cultural and nutritional contexts (1).

The social dimension of sustainability is illustrated in the study by Cisneros-Vásquez et al., who reported that food insecurity persists even in high-income countries, disproportionately affecting adolescents from immigrant or low-education families. This evidence underscores the urgent need to integrate food justice and equitable access within the global agenda of sustainable nutrition. Research in nutritional epidemiology must incorporate new approaches, such as qualitative or mixed-method designs, that allow for a more multidimensional understanding of diet and sustainability (2).

Finally, the meta-analysis conducted by Mo et al. reaffirmed the association between plant-based dietary patterns and longevity, showing that greater adherence to healthy plant-based diets was associated with lower total and cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, unhealthy plant-based diets increased mortality risk.

The studies included in this Research Topic demonstrate significant progress in developing integrative dietary indices that quantify the relationships among diet quality, metabolic wellbeing, and environmental sustainability. The PHDI operationalizes the concept of the planetary health diet by linking nutritional adequacy with ecological impact. The DI-GM, introduces a microbiota-centered perspective as a novel component for evaluating diet quality. Finally, the S-DI extends this approach to the culinary and institutional management sphere, integrating practical sustainability metrics into food service systems.

Future research should move beyond observational studies and toward public-level interventions capable of influencing population behavior. Importantly, this does not imply relying exclusively on randomized controlled trials. Pragmatic trials and quasi-experimental designs that draw on real-world observational data are equally necessary. Causal inference approaches can strengthen these designs by improving estimates of the feasibility, effectiveness, and scalability of modifying food environments, ensuring that sustainability is incorporated from study design to measurable outcomes.

It is essential to emphasize the importance of integrating nutrition and sustainability into public health policy. Together, these studies demonstrate that healthy and sustainable diets are fundamental for improving population health, reducing environmental degradation, and promoting social equity. Indices such as the PHDI, DI-GM, and S-DI help support the development of evidence-based public policies, as well as educational programs and transdisciplinary research aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (3). The adoption of approaches such as those presented in this Research Topic may help drive food system transitions that are just, resilient, and health-promoting. By linking biological aging, metabolic regulation, and planetary boundaries, this Research Topic outlines a holistic pathway toward nutrition for planetary health, where dietary choices support the wellbeing of both people and the planet.

Author contributions

GM: Writing – original draft. SC: Writing – original draft. SP-S: Writing – review & editing. IR-C: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI was used to improve the English language and the overall writing quality of the manuscript. All content was reviewed, validated, and approved by the author(s).

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Rockström J, Thilsted SH, Willett WC, Gordon LJ, Herrero M, Hicks CC, et al. The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems. Lancet. (2025) 406:1625–700. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01201-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Guillaumie L, Boiral O, Baghdadli A, Mercille G. Integrating sustainable nutrition into health-related institutions: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Public Health. (2020) 111:845–61. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00394-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: United Nations (2015). Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (Accessed December 1, 2025).

Google Scholar

4. Jones AR, Alleway HK, McAfee D, Reis-Santos P, Theuerkauf SJ, Jones RC. Climate-friendly seafood: the potential for emissions reduction and carbon capture in marine aquaculture. Biosci. (2022) 72:123–43. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dietary pattern, epidemiology, food system, index, nutritional epidemiology, sustainability

Citation: Morales G, Cofre S, Parra-Soto S and Ríos-Castillo I (2026) Editorial: Nutritional epidemiology: advances in the analysis of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns. Front. Nutr. 13:1773578. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1773578

Received: 22 December 2025; Accepted: 13 January 2026;
Published: 10 February 2026.

Edited and reviewed by: Mauro Serafini, University of Teramo, Italy

Copyright © 2026 Morales, Cofre, Parra-Soto and Ríos-Castillo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sebastián Cofre, c2NvZnJlQHVjbS5jbA==

ORCID: Gladys Morales orcid.org/0000-0001-7194-8833
Sebastián Cofre orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-7941
Solange Parra-Soto orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-7327
Israel Ríos-Castillo orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-3189

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.