Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys.

Sec. Social Physics

Research on Disinformation Strategies for Public Emergencies: Dual Considerations of Timeliness and Accuracy

Provisionally accepted
Yuxi  ZhuYuxi ZhuYaohui  PanYaohui Pan*
  • School of Economics and Management, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

At present, social media has become a breeding ground for online rumors. Its massive scale of users, as well as immediacy, openness, and other characteristics, make the breadth and speed of rumor dissemination much higher than the real social network, which significantly impacts people's lives and social stability. Studying the evolutionary mechanism of the competitive dissemination of information in public emergencies can help the government and the media monitor public opinion and guide public opinion effectively. We consider the competition mechanism between rumor and anti-rumor in competing for individual attention and trust, the influence of herd mentality, timeliness, and accuracy of anti-rumor, and construct a two-stage competitive communication model in which rumor and anti-rumor coexist. Python simulates the competitive evolution of rumor and anti-rumor, and the government's response strategies are discussed. The government's anti-rumor policy under different government credibility strengths and different sensitivities of public opinion topics is also further explored. The study shows that improving the timeliness and precision of anti-rumor release can effectively curb the scale of rumor dissemination, and the timeliness of anti-rumor has a more significant impact on the effect of anti-rumor, suggesting that responding to social concerns in a timely manner and continuously improving the precision of information release according to the development of the situation is the only way to achieve effective anti-rumor; When the government's credibility is extremely low, official statements may trigger the "Tacitus Trap" due to the lack of public trust, leading to the failure of anti-rumor, and it is necessary to reconstruct the foundation of governance through long-term trust ecological construction; in highly sensitive public opinion events, the surge of public participation may easily lead to the "double helix" effect of the simultaneous proliferation of rumors and anti-rumor, which requires the government to adopt more frequent, multi-channel and collaborative measures.

Keywords: anti-rumor, Information competition, Public emergencies, Public opinion dissemination, rumor

Received: 17 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Zhu and Pan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yaohui Pan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.