
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
GENERAL COMMENTARY article
Front. Psychol. , 24 January 2014
Sec. Cognitive Science
Volume 5 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00015
This article is a commentary on:
Navigating Comics: An Empirical and Theoretical Approach to Strategies of Reading Comic Page Layouts
An erratum on
Navigating comics: an empirical and theoretical approach to strategies of reading comic page layouts
by Cohn N. (2013). Front. Psychol. 4:186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00186
This General Commentary provides a corrected version of the caption for Figure 2. The text should read:
(A) Canonical grid layout stereotypically read in a “Z-path.” (B) Layout where a vertical panel “blocks” the creation of a row of panels. (C) Layout where panels are separated by a wide space. (D) Layout where panels overlap each other. (E) Layout where panels are staggered to no longer retain a contiguous gutter.
In addition, the link to the supplementary analysis of the Steranko page has been changed to: http://www.visuallanguagelab.com/P/ECS_Supplement.pdf
Keywords: comics, page layout, spatial representation, reading order, writing systems
Citation: Cohn N (2014) Erratum: Navigating comics: an empirical and theoretical approach to strategies of reading comic page layouts. Front. Psychol. 5:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00015
Received: 19 December 2013; Accepted: 07 January 2014;
Published online: 24 January 2014.
Edited by:
Eddy J. Davelaar, Birkbeck College, UKCopyright © 2014 Cohn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence:bmVpbGNvaG5AZW1ha2kubmV0
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.