Abstract
Purpose:
The aims of the study were first to investigate the association between illness perception and psychological distress and second to determine whether mindfulness affects psychological distress via illness perception and perceived stress in patients with lung cancer.
Methods:
Among 300 patients with lung cancer who participated in this cross-sectional study, 295 patients made valid responses to distress thermometer (DT), the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) between January and July 2021. The possible pathways of mindfulness affecting psychological distress were analyzed based on the structural equation modeling analysis.
Results:
A total of 24.4% patients with lung cancer had DT > 4. Illness perception (β = 0.17, p = 0.002) and perceived stress (β = 0.23, p < 0.001) had a direct effect on psychological distress. Mindfulness had a direct effect on illness perception (β = −0.16, p = 0.006) and mindfulness indirectly influenced psychological distress (β = −0.04, p = 0.009) through affecting illness perception alone or simultaneously affecting both the illness perception and perceived stress in patients with lung cancer.
Conclusion:
Lung cancer suffered from varying levels of psychological distress. Mindfulness may alleviate psychological distress by reducing the level of illness perception and perceived stress. We suggest developing a comprehensive factor model to clarify potential mechanisms of mindfulness on psychological distress due to the very low effect of mindfulness on psychological distress via illness perception and perceived stress.
Introduction
According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, psychological distress is a multifactorial and unpleasant emotional experience, involving changes in psychological, social, spiritual, and physical aspects (Riba et al., 2019). Psychological distress can be detected at any stage in patients with cancer and even remain throughout the cancer trajectory (). Overall, studies reported a prevalence of 20–52% for psychological distress [distress thermometer (DT) > 4] among patients with cancer (; ). However, compared to patients with other types of cancers, patients with lung cancer reported the highest incidence of psychological distress (Zabora et al., 2001), with a detection rate of 17.0–73.0% (; ; Tian et al., 2021a). It is noted that approximately 220 million new lung cancer cases were estimated in 2020, ranking second place among all the cancers (Sung et al., 2021). Therefore, the anticipated prevalence of psychological distress among patients with lung cancer should be especially emphasized.
Psychological distress has become a major psychological problem faced by patients with cancer because it has been demonstrated to be associated with the occurrence of several adverse consequences (Riba et al., 2019). As an example, psychological distress was found to be the contributor to the interruption of anticancer treatment (; ; Yee et al., 2017). Meanwhile, psychological distress has also been found to be associated with longer hospital stays (Nipp et al., 2017), poor quality of life (), and increased risk of mortality (; ). Moreover, psychological distress was evidenced to accelerate the growth of tumor cells (Zhang et al., 2020a). Therefore, to develop effective intervention protocols to address psychological distress among patients with lung cancer, it is critically important to clarify the potential mechanisms involved in the development and progress of psychological distress (Riba et al., 2019).
Background
Mindfulness refers to an individual’s focused attention on the present moment and non-judgmental awareness (). As a protective source of negative psychological outcomes, several studies have suggested the positive effects of mindfulness among different populations (), even in the general population (). At present, several meta-analyses have demonstrated that interventions involving mindfulness elements (; Zhang et al., 2019; Nnate et al., 2021; Rieger et al., 2021), such as mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MCT), mindfulness-based art intervention, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), significantly improved the psychological wellbeing of patients with cancer. It should be noted that, moreover, our previous study consistently determined the negative association between mindfulness and psychological distress among patients with lung cancer and further clarified the influence of mindfulness on psychological distress through the mediating role of social support and perceived stigma, with a slight total effect of 0.048 (). However, are there other potential mechanisms else in the association between mindfulness and psychological distress among patients with lung cancer to be discovered and elucidated?
Illness perception refers to an individual’s reflection in both the cognitive and emotional aspects and coping styles through personal knowledge and experiences when one confronts symptoms or illness threats, which have been revealed to have an impact on health outcomes (). In a prospective, longitudinal, and observational study, illness perceptions were demonstrated as a potential predictor of psychological distress in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Zhang et al., 2020b). Meanwhile, illness perception has been found to predict psychological distress in head and neck cancer survivors (Zhang et al., 2018), esophageal cancer survivors (), and breast cancer survivors (Zhang et al., 2017). However, it is not yet known whether the same association holds for patients with lung cancer. Moreover, no study has investigated the association between mindfulness and illness perception; however, mindfulness-based interventions have been found to reduce the level of negative illness perceptions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis () or acute coronary syndrome (Nasiri et al., 2020). We, therefore, assume that the association between mindfulness and illness perception also holds among patients with lung cancer.
Perceived stress refers to an individual’s subjective perception of stress and assessment of the ability of processing stress (), which was positively related to psychological distress among patients with lung cancer in our previous study (Tian et al., 2021a). Meanwhile, perceived stress was also speculated to be associated with mindfulness because mindfulness-based intervention protocols had generally been shown to reduce stress (). Interestingly, the negative association between mindfulness and perceived stress has been detected in patients with digestive tract cancer (Zhong et al., 2019). Moreover, some studies have also investigated the relationship between illness perception and perceived stress and found that individuals will experience greater levels of perceived stress if they negatively perceived their illness (). Unfortunately, these relationships of variables introduced above have not yet been determined in patients with lung cancer.
In the light of the above, we performed this study to examine three hypotheses as follow: (a) illness perception is positively associated with perceived stress and psychological distress, (b) mindfulness can influence psychological distress through illness perception, and (c) mindfulness has an impact on psychological distress through simultaneously influencing illness perception and perceived stress among patients with lung cancer.
Methods
Study Design
This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey design.
Participants
We recruited eligible patients with convenience sampling method from a tertiary hospital in Chongqing between January and July 2021 according to the inclusion criteria which was designed according to our previous studies (Tian et al., 2021a,b): adult patients were diagnosed with lung cancer based on definitive and route methods and confirmed to have ability to clearly and accurately read and write. Patients who were confirmed to have a mental disorder or received psychological treatment before eligibility evaluation or participated in those studies with similar study aims were excluded from this study.
Sample Size
In this study, we used structural equation modeling technique with maximum likelihood to examine all the paths between variables, the N:q rule with a ratio of 10/1 was, therefore, used to calculate the theoretical sample size, in which N and q indicate required cases and the number of parameters that require statistical estimates, respectively (). In this study, q was identified to be 10 and, thus, a minimum sample size of 120 was calculated under the consideration of 20% invalid questionnaires.
Study Variables
Demographic information was collected using a self-designed questionnaire and other variables, namely, psychological distress, illness perception, and perceived stress were measured using validated instruments, which have been translated into Chinese and published publicly in academic journals.
Demographic Information
In this study, we collected the following sociodemographic and clinical variables by the self-designed information collection form, namely, gender, age, educational degree, marital status, place of residence, occupational status, family history, pain, cancer metastasis, and tumor’s TNM stage.
Psychological Distress
We used DT to measure psychological distress at an 11-point thermometer scale from 0 to 10 in this study and 0 and 10 indicate no distress and extreme distress, respectively (Riba et al., 2019). The reliability and validity of DT have been extensively tested across different settings (). According to several empirical studies, an individual with a score of 4 was defined to have clinically significant psychological distress (; ). There was no exception in China, a score of 4 was also demonstrated as the cutoff value of defining clinically significant psychological distress in Chinese cancer populations ().
Mindfulness
We used the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), which was developed by Baer and colleagues in 2006 (), to measure the level of mindfulness at a 5-point Likert scale. In the original version, total of 39 items were effectively pooled to assess mindfulness from five facets as follows: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging, and non-reacting (). The original FFMQ has been translated into Chinese by , with acceptable psychometric properties.
Illness Perception
We used the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), which was developed by Weinman et al. (1996), to measure emotional and cognitive representations of illness at an 8-item continuous linear scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent more negative illness perceptions. have shown the B-IPQ to have good test-retest reliability and predictive and discriminant validity. The B-IPQ has been translated into Chinese (Xue and Lin, 0000) and has been widely used as a screening tool for assessing illness perceptions in China ().
Perceived Stress
We used the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), which was developed by , to measure the level of perceived stress at a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. A higher score represents a greater stress level. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.84 at the instrument development stage. The Chinese version of the 10-item PSS has been found to have the Cronbach’s alpha of 0.619 (Yuan and Lin, 2009).
Procedure
We strictly performed this study following the provision of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved our protocol and assigned an ethical identifier of CZLS2021183-A to this protocol before enrollment commenced. Before conducting the formal survey, all eligible patients were informed about objectives and the risks and benefits of the study and required to sign informed consent. Study questionnaires were independently and anonymously completed by patients. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were utilized to guide us to report all the data (von Elm et al., 2014).
Statistical Analysis
All the valid questionnaires were completely written by responders. Descriptive statistics for all the variables were calculated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (Chicago, IL, United States). Age, the score of psychological distress, mindfulness, social support, and perceived stigma were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) because all did not follow normal distribution according to the results from the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22.0 to examine the relations between mindfulness, illness perception, perceived stress, and psychological distress. The mediation model was tested using AMOS version 21.0 (Chicago, IL, United States). In these analyses, we used 2,000 bootstrap resamples and focused on the bias-corrected and accelerated CI. The following indices were calculated to evaluate the fitness of the overall model: the ratio of the chi-squared (χ2) to degrees of freedom (df), comparative fit index (CFI), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), adjusted GFI (AGFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), incremental fit index (IFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with 90% CI. Model fit was regarded as good when a ratio of χ2/df was equal to or less than 3. For GFI and AGFI, a value of p < 0.90 indicates a good model fit. Moreover, CFI of ≥ 0.90 and RMSEA of < 0.05 were also suggesting a good model fit. A p < 0.05 indicated significance for all the analyses.
Results
Sample Characteristics
A total of 300 eligible patients with lung cancer were recruited to participate in this survey study eventually, of which 295 patients returned valid questionnaires, representing a valid response rate of 98.3%. Among these 295 patients, 72 patients were defined to have clinically significant psychological distress, with a detection rate of 24.4%. Sociodemographic and clinical variables of 295 patients are shown in Table 1. Most patients were men (71.2%) and did not get adequate education (67.1%) and a significant number of patients were married (97.6%). Most patients lived in urban (71.5%) and balanced medical expenditure with medical insurance (96.9%), and more than half of them suffered from cancer metastasis (64.1%). Although most patients had no family history (92.2%), a significant number of patients were at the advanced stage (81.0%) and had no or mild pain (99.0%).
TABLE 1
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) | Mean rank | Z/χ2 | P |
| Gender | −1.197 | 0.231a | ||
| Male | 210 (71.2) | 144.65 | ||
| Female | 85 (28.8) | 156.26 | ||
| Age, years | 0.567 | 0.753b | ||
| 18–40 | 4 (1.4) | 164.00 | ||
| 41–60 | 144 (48.8) | 150.55 | ||
| >60 | 147 (49.8) | 145.06 | ||
| Education | 1.650 | 0.648b | ||
| Illiterate or elementary school | 88 (29.8) | 142.61 | ||
| Junior school | 110 (37.3) | 146.97 | ||
| Senior high school | 57 (19.3) | 149.27 | ||
| College or above | 40 (13.6) | 160.88 | ||
| Marital status | 2.535 | 0.282b | ||
| Married | 288 (97.6) | 146.91 | ||
| Unmarried | 1 (0.4) | 199.50 | ||
| Widowed or divorced | 6 (2.0) | 191.67 | ||
| Residence | −0.120 | 0.905a | ||
| Urban | 211 (71.5) | 148.33 | ||
| Rural | 84 (28.5) | 147.17 | ||
| Occupation status | 3.616 | 0.164b | ||
| Unemployed | 112 (38.0) | 145.60 | ||
| Employed | 40 (13.6) | 169.01 | ||
| Retired | 143 (48.4) | 144.00 | ||
| Medical insurance | 0.502 | 0.478a | ||
| Self-paying | 9 (3.1) | 130.44 | ||
| Medicare | 286 (96.9) | 148.55 | ||
| Family history | −1.860 | 0.063a | ||
| No | 272 (92.2) | 150.38 | ||
| Yes | 23 (7.8) | 119.89 | ||
| Pain | 27.307 | <0.001b | ||
| No | 190 (64.4) | 131.84 | ||
| Mild | 102 (34.6) | 176.74 | ||
| Moderate | 2 (0.7) | 143.75 | ||
| Severe | 1 (0.3) | 295.00 | ||
| Cancer metastasis | −3.181 | 0.001a | ||
| No | 106 (35.9) | 166.66 | ||
| Yes | 189 (64.1) | 137.53 | ||
| Tumor stage | 7.687 | 0.053b | ||
| I | 30 (10.2) | 159.30 | ||
| II | 26 (8.8) | 183.69 | ||
| III | 38 (12.9) | 141.16 | ||
| IV | 201 (68.1) | 142.99 |
Psychological distress among patients with different sample characteristics (N = 295).
aMann–Whitney U test.
bKruskal–Wallis H test.
Relationships of Psychological Distress, Mindfulness, Illness Perception, and Perceived Stress
Overall, the median score of psychological distress was 0 with an IQR of from 0 to 3. The score of mindfulness, illness perception, and perceived stress was 115 (109 to 119), 43 (39 to 47), and 20 (17 to 23), respectively. We designed Table 2 to display the relationships of psychological distress, mindfulness, illness perception, and perceived stress. The results of the Spearman’s rank correlation analyses suggested that all the variables were significantly correlated with one another.
TABLE 2
| Variable | Median (P25, P75) | Psychological distress | Mindfulness | Illness perception | Perceived stress |
| Psychological distress | 0 (0, 3) | 1 | |||
| Mindfulness | 115 (109, 119) | −0.143* | 1 | ||
| Illness perception | 43 (39, 47) | 0.233** | −0.181** | 1 | |
| Perceived stress | 20 (17, 23) | 0.235** | −0.116* | 0.143* | 1 |
Spearman correlations for mindfulness, illness perception, perceived stress, and psychological distress.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Structural Equation Modeling of the Association of Psychological Distress, Mindfulness, Illness Perception, and Perceived Stress
We first constructed the relationship structure of all variables according to the results of the correlation matrix. After conducting model fit analysis, we found that the direct path from mindfulness to psychological distress or perceived stress was not statistically significant (Figure 1A). We therefore eliminated those two paths to good fit the structural model (χ2/df = 0.867, CFI = 0.999, GFI = 1.000, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.019, and RMSEA = 0.000 [0.000 to 0.111]).
FIGURE 1
As illustrated in Figure 1A, illness perception (β = 0.18 and p = 0.002) and perceived stress (β = 0.23 and p < 0.001) had direct positive effects on psychological distress. The direct pathways from mindfulness to illness perception (β = −0.16 and p = 0.006) and from illness perception to perceived stress (β = 0.17 and p = 0.003) were all statistically significant.
The results from the bootstrap test for the significance of all pathways are shown in Table 3. Results for indirect pathways indicated that the indirect pathways between illness perception and psychological distress through perceived stress were statistically significant (B = 0.04, 95% CI [0.02–0.07], and p = 0.009). Overall, the total effect of illness perception on psychological distress was 0.22 [95% CI (0.12–0.30) and p = 0.007]. Furthermore, mindfulness had only an indirect negative effect on perceived stress through illness perception, with an indirect effect of −0.03 [95% CI (−0.07 to −0.01) and p = 0.009]. However, mindfulness had an impact on psychological distress through influencing only illness perception (Figure 1B) or influencing simultaneously illness perception and perceived stress (Figure 1C). Specifically, the indirect effect of mindfulness on psychological distress was −0.03 through mediating effect of illness perception alone, and the indirect effect of mindfulness on psychological distress was −0.01 through the chain mediating effect of illness perception and perceived stress. Overall, the total effect of mindfulness on psychological distress was −0.04 through two indirect pathways. The results suggested that illness perception and perceived stress play a chain mediating role in the relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress among patients with lung cancer.
TABLE 3
| Direct effect (95% CI) | Indirect effect (95% CI) | Total effect (95% CI) | |
| Direct path | |||
| Mindfulness → Illness perception | −0.16 (−0.27, −0.07) | n.a. | −0.16 (−0.27, 0.07) |
| Illness perception → Perceived stress | 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) | n.a. | 0.17 (0.08, 0.26) |
| Illness perception → Psychological distress | 0.18 (0.09, 0.26) | n.a. | 0.18 (0.09, 0.26) |
| Perceived stress → Psychological distress | 0.23 (0.10, 0.30) | n.a. | 0.23 (0.10, 0.30) |
| Indirect path | |||
| Illness perception → Psychological distress | 0.18 (0.09, 0.26) | 0.04 (0.02, 0.07) | 0.22 (0.12, 0.30) |
| Mindfulness → Perceived stress | n.a. | −0.03 (−0.07, −0.01) | −0.03 (−0.07, −0.01) |
| Mindfulness → Psychological distress | n.a. | −0.04 (−0.07, −0.02) | −0.04 (−0.07, −0.02) |
Effect estimates of mindfulness to psychological distress through illness perception and perceived stress.
CI, confidence interval; n.a., not available.
Discussion
Psychological distress has been demonstrated to be associated with several negative clinical outcomes such as interruption of anticancer treatment, poor quality of life, and higher morbidity and mortality (Riba et al., 2019). It is imperative to clarify the potential mechanisms of the development and progress of psychological distress among patients with lung cancer to develop a more effective intervention protocol (; Riba et al., 2019). The major aim of this study is to determine whether negative illness perception is positively related to be psychological distress and whether mindfulness may have a protective effect on psychological distress through negatively influencing illness perception and perceived stress among patients with lung cancer.
After completing this study, we found that 24.4% of patients experienced clinically significant psychological distress, which was consistent with previous findings (Tian et al., 2021a) although there also are some studies that reported a higher detection rate (; ). It is possible that the relatively lower detection rate of psychological distress in our study can be explained by the fact that patients experience significantly serious stigma after confirming the diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (), which has an impact on the tendency of patients to deliberately conceal their psychological distress. Moreover, as stated in our previous study (), DT is not specific to patients with cancer () and cannot differentiate the risk of initial psychological distress from the accumulated risk of psychological distress, which may be an explanation for our findings.
Leventhal’s commonsense model of illness representations proposes that individuals’ illness perceptions are the major determinants of their health outcomes (). The individual will concurrently construct or elaborate both cognitive and emotional representations of their symptoms and illness to relieve the adverse impacts resulting from the symptom or an illness (). Some studies have revealed the association between illness perception and psychological distress among different populations (Zhang et al., 2017, 2018, 2020b). In this study, we first investigated the association between illness perception and psychological distress among patients with lung cancer and determined that illness perception was positively related to psychological distress.
As a positive psychological trait, mindfulness was found to be beneficial for improving adverse psychological outcomes through effective self-designed regulation and keeping positive emotional status (). We have previously determined the direct association between mindfulness and psychological distress in patients with lung cancer; however, this specific association was not held in this study, which may be explained by the relatively mild severity of psychological distress compared with our finding (). Moreover, we did not separately investigate the relationships of facets in mindfulness scale and psychological distress (). Interestingly, we first determined the negative association between mindfulness and illness perception and revealed that mindfulness has an indirect impact on psychological distress through correcting negative illness perception. Illness perceptions refer to the attitudes, beliefs, and expectations of patients about symptoms or illnesses (), which are related to health information behavior practices and coping strategies (). Several studies have established that mindfulness-based interventions were associated with increased positive health perceptions and health behaviors (Roberts and Danoff-Burg, 2010), which provide theoretical support for our findings.
This study also revealed another novel finding that mindfulness indirectly influenced psychological distress among patients with lung cancer through the mediating effect of illness perception and perceived stress. As we introduced earlier, a higher negative perception of symptoms or illness represented worse psychological outcomes (Weinman et al., 1996). As one of the most common psychosocial risk factors, perceived stress has been suggested as a precursor state of adverse psychological outcomes because it has a negative impact on individual psychological adjustment (). Previous studies also revealed the predictive effect of illness perception on perceived stress (; Sadeghi et al., 2019), which was further demonstrated in this study.
This study has some potential limitations that should be further interpreted. First, we used a convenience sample to investigate the associations between variables, which may introduce bias. Second, we calculated the theoretical sample size according to the number of variables, rather than performing an estimation based on acceptable statistical power. Third, all the patients were recruited from a single hospital in a single city and the sample size was relatively small; therefore, the generalizability of the study is questionable. Fourth, the level of mindfulness, illness perception, perceived street, and psychological distress were measured by using the self-report instruments, which may introduce subjective bias from patients. Definitively speaking, the prevalence of psychological distress and the type of scale could have some effects on the results.
Conclusion
This study first shows that illness perception is positively related to the perceived stress and psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and negatively related to mindfulness. This study provided some evidence for the hypothesis that mindfulness can relieve the severity of psychological distress by decreasing the level of negative illness perception alone or decreasing the level of negative illness perception and perceived stress simultaneously. Based on these findings, illness perception and perceived stress screening should be enrolled in mindfulness-based intervention strategies for patients with lung cancer. Certainly, the total effect of mindfulness on psychological distress through the two targeted pathways in this study was very low; we, therefore, suggest continuing to explore other potential mechanisms.
Clinical Implications
This study further clarified the potential mechanism of mindfulness on psychological distress through influencing illness perception and perceived stress in patients with lung cancer. From our current findings, mindfulness-based intervention protocol focusing on the correction of illness perception and reduction of perceived stress may be feasible and effective in improving psychological distress among patients with lung cancer.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chongqing University Cancer Hospital. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
Author contributions
LT and XT: had full access to all of the data in the study and are held responsible for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. X-PQ, LT, XT, and MJ-H: concept and design. X-PQ, LT, XT, and L-JY: acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. X-PQ, XT, and MJ-H: drafting of the manuscript. XT, G-HC, and MJ-H: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. X-PQ and XT: statistical analysis. XT: obtaining funding, administrative, technical, or material support. MJ-H: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The research team gratefully acknowledges the supervisors of the hospitals and the 295 patients with lung cancer who voluntarily participated in the study, and the experts and members of the group for their help and advice.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.HopkinsJ.KrietemeyerJ.ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness.Assessment1327–45. 10.1177/1073191105283504
2
BattyG. D.RussT. C.StamatakisE.KivimäkiM. (2017). Psychological distress in relation to site specific cancer mortality: pooling of unpublished data from 16 prospective cohort studies.BMJ (Clin. Res. ed.)356:j108. 10.1136/bmj.j108
3
BroadbentE.PetrieK. J.MainJ.WeinmanJ. (2006). The brief illness perception questionnaire.J. Psychosom. Res.60631–637.
4
BurgerJ. W.BantjesJ.DermanW.WhitesmanS.Gomez-EzeizaJ. (2021). Associations between psychological distress and facets of mindfulness: Implications for campus-based university wellness services.J. Am. Coll. Health1–10. [Epub online ahead of print]. 10.1080/07448481.2021.1920601
5
CarlsonL. E.AngenM.CullumJ.GoodeyE.KoopmansJ.LamontL.et al (2004). High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients.Brit. J. Cancer902297–2304. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601887
6
ChambersS. K.BaadeP.YoulP.AitkenJ.OcchipintiS.VinodP. C. (2015). Psychological distress and quality of life in lung cancer: the role of health-related stigma, illness appraisals and social constraints.Psycho-oncol.241569–1577. 10.1002/pon.3829
7
CillessenL.JohannsenM.SpeckensA. E. M.ZachariaeR. (2019). Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Psychooncology282257–2269. 10.1002/pon.5214
8
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress.J. Health Soc. Behav.24385–396. 10.2307/2136404
9
DaliliZ.BayaziM. H. (2019). The effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on the illness perception and Psychological Symptoms in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Complement Ther. Clin. Pract.34139–144. 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.11.012
10
DempsterM.McCorryN. K.BrennanE.DonnellyM.MurrayL. J.JohnstonB. T. (2011). Do changes in illness perceptions predict changes in psychological distress among oesophageal cancer survivors?J. Health Psychol.16500–509. 10.1177/1359105310386633
11
DengY.-Q.LiuX.-H.RodriguezM. A.XiaC.-Y. (2011). The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version.Mindfulness2123–128. 10.1007/s12671-011-0050-9
12
DiefenbachM. A.LeventhalH. (1996). The common-sense model of illness representation: Theoretical and practical considerations.J. Soc. Distress Homeless511–38. 10.1055/s-0029-1234052
13
DonovanK. A.GrassiL.McGintyH. L.JacobsenP. B. (2014). Validation of the distress thermometer worldwide: state of the science.Psycho-oncology23241–250. 10.1002/pon.3430
14
FreudenthalerL.TurbaJ. D.TranU. S. (2017). Emotion Regulation Mediates the Associations of Mindfulness on Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in the General Population.Mindfulness (N Y)81339–1344. 10.1007/s12671-017-0709-y
15
FunkR.CisnerosC.WilliamsR. C.KendallJ.HamannH. A. (2016). What happens after distress screening? Patterns of supportive care service utilization among oncology patients identified through a systematic screening protocol.Support Care Cancer242861–2868. 10.1007/s00520-016-3099-0
16
GaoW.BennettM. I.StarkD.MurrayS.HigginsonI. J. (2010). Psychological distress in cancer from survivorship to end of life care: prevalence, associated factors and clinical implications.Eur. J. Cancer462036–2044. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.033
17
HamerM.ChidaY.MolloyG. J. (2009). Psychological distress and cancer mortality.J. Psychosomat. Res.66255–258. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.002
18
HongJ.WeiZ.WangW. (2015). Preoperative psychological distress, coping and quality of life in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer.J. Clin. Nurs.242439–2447. 10.1111/jocn.12816
19
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past. Present, and Future.Clin. Psychol.: Sci. Prac.10144–156. 10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
20
KashiwazakiY.TakebayashiY.MurakamiM. (2020). Relationships between radiation risk perception and health anxiety, and contribution of mindfulness to alleviating psychological distress after the Fukushima accident: Cross-sectional study using a path model.PloS One15:e0235517. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235517
21
KatavicS. S.TanackovicS. F.BadurinaB. (2016). Illness perception and information behaviour of patients with rare chronic diseases.Inform. Res.21707.
22
KimJ.JangM. (2020). Stress, Social Support, and Sexual Adjustment in Married Female Patients with Breast Cancer in Korea.Asia Pac. J. Oncol. Nurs.728–35. 10.4103/apjon.apjon_31_19
23
LeiH.TianX.JinY. F.TangL.ChenW. Q.Jiménez-HerreraM. F. (2021). The chain mediating role of social support and stigma in the relationship between mindfulness and psychological distress among Chinese lung cancer patients.Support Care Cancer296761–6770.
24
LengacherC. A.GrussL. F.KipK. E.ReichR. R.ChaucaK. G.MoscosoM. S.et al (2021). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer survivors (MBSR(BC)): evaluating mediators of psychological and physical outcomes in a large randomized controlled trial.J. Behav. Med.44591–604. 10.1007/s10865-021-00214-0
25
LeventhalH.PhillipsL. A.BurnsE. (2016). The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): a dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management.J. Behav. Med.39935–946. 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2
26
LinC.ClarkR.TuP.BosworthH. B.ZulligL. L. (2017). Breast cancer oral anti-cancer medication adherence: a systematic review of psychosocial motivators and barriers.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.165247–260. 10.1007/s10549-017-4317-2
27
LudwigD. S.Kabat-ZinnJ. (2008). Mindfulness in Medicine.JAMA3001350–1352.
28
LynchJ.GoodhartF.SaundersY.O’ConnorS. J. (2010). Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient Distress Thermometer.Support. Care Cancer J. Multinatl. Assoc. Support. Care Cancer19193–202. 10.1007/s00520-009-0799-8
29
MaguireL. LewisKotronoulasG.McPhelimJ.MilroyR.CataldoJ. (2019). Lung cancer stigma: A concept with consequences for patients.Cancer Rep.2:e1201. 10.1002/cnr2.1201
30
MausbachB. T.SchwabR. B.IrwinS. A. (2015). Depression as a predictor of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.152239–246. 10.1007/s10549-015-3471-7
31
McDonaldR. P.HoM. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.Psychol. Methods764–82. 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64
32
MehnertA.HartungT. J.FriedrichM.VehlingS.BrählerE.HärterM.et al (2018). One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress.Psychooncology2775–82. 10.1002/pon.4464
33
MiceliJ.GellerD.TsungA.HechtC. L.WangY.PathakR.et al (2019). Illness perceptions and perceived stress in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.Psychooncology281513–1519. 10.1002/pon.5108
34
NasiriZ.AlaviM.GhazaviZ.RabieiK. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness-based intervention on perceived stress and perception of disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome.J. Educ. Health Promot.9:130. 10.4103/jehp.jehp_660_19
35
NippR. D.El-JawahriA.MoranS. M.D’ArpinoS. M.JohnsonP. C.LageR. L.et al (2017). The relationship between physical and psychological symptoms and health care utilization in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.Cancer1234720–4727. 10.1002/cncr.30912
36
NnateD. A.AnyachukwuC. C.IgweS. E.AbaraoguU. O. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological wellbeing and quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychooncology301680–1690. 10.1002/pon.5749
37
RibaM. B.DonovanK. A.AndersenB.BraunI.BreitbartW. S.BrewerB. W. (2019). Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw.171229–1249. 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048
38
RiegerK. L.LobchukM. M.DuffM. A.ChernomasW. M.DemczukL.Campbell-EnnsH. J.et al (2021). Mindfulness-based arts interventions for cancer care: A systematic review of the effects on wellbeing and fatigue.Psychooncology30240–251. 10.1002/pon.5560
39
RobertsK. C.Danoff-BurgS. (2010). Mindfulness and health behaviors: is paying attention good for you?J. Am. Coll. Health59165–173. 10.1080/07448481.2010.484452
40
SadeghiM.AlaviM.MohammadiM.RoohafzaH.MahmoodiA.VisentinD.et al (2019). Perceptions of illness as predictive factors for perceived stress in patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program.Nurs. Health Sci.21508–51410.1111/nhs.12635
41
SungH.FerlayJ.SiegelR. L.LaversanneM.SoerjomataramI.JemalA.et alGlobal cancer statistics 2021: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA A Cancer J. Clin.71209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660
42
TianX.JinY. F.ChenH.TangL.Jimenez-HerreraM. F. (2021a). Relationships among Social Support, Coping Style, Perceived Stress, and Psychological Distress in Chinese Lung Cancer Patients.Asia-Pacific J. Oncol. Nurs.8172–179. 10.4103/apjon.apjon_59_20
43
TianX.JinY.ChenH.TangL.Jiménez-HerreraM. F. (2021b). The positive effect of social support on psychological distress among Chinese lung cancer patients: The mediating role of self-esteem.Nurs. Open81642–1651. 10.1002/nop2.793
44
von ElmE.AltmanD. G.EggerM.PocockS. J.GøtzscheP. C.VandenbrouckeJ. P. (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.Int. J. Surg.121495–1499.
45
WeinmanJ.PetrieK. J.Moss-MorrisR. (1996). The Illness Perception Questionnaire: a new method for assessing illness perceptions.Psychol. Health1431–446. 10.1080/08870449608400270
46
XueF.LinY.Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: Chinese Version. Available online at: www.uib.no/ipq/pdf/B-IPQ-Chinese.pdf
47
YeeM. K.SereikaS. M.BenderC. M.BrufskyA. M.ConnollyM. C.RosenzweigM. Q. (2017). Symptom incidence, distress, cancer-related distress, and adherence to chemotherapy among African American women with breast cancer.Cancer1232061–2069. 10.1002/cncr.30575
48
YuanL. X.LinN. (2009). Research on factor structure of perceived stress scale in Chinese college students (in Chinese).J. Guangdong Educ. Instit.2945–49.
49
ZaboraJ.BrintzenhofeSzocK.CurbowB.HookerC.PiantadosiS. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site.Psycho-Oncol.1019–28. 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::aid-pon501>3.0.co;2-6
50
ZhangN.FieldingR.SoongI.ChanK. K.LeeC.NgA.et al (2018). Illness perceptions as predictors of psychological distress among head and neck cancer survivors: a longitudinal study.Head Neck402362–2371. 10.1002/hed.25343
51
ZhangN.FieldingR.SoongI.ChanK. K.LeeC.NgA.et al (2017). Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in breast cancer survivors.PLoS One12:e0174093. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174093
52
ZhangQ.ZhaoH.ZhengY. (2019). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer27771–781. 10.1007/s00520-018-4570-x
53
ZhangY.ZanosP.JacksonI. L.ZhangX.ZhuX.GouldT.et al (2020a). sychological stress enhances tumor growth and diminishes radiation response in preclinical model of lung cancer. Radiotherapy and oncology.J. Euro. Soc. Therap. Radiol. Oncol.146126–135. 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.004
54
ZhangZ.YangL.XieD.WangY.BiL.ZhangT.et al (2020b). Illness perceptions are a potential predictor of psychological distress in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a 12-month prospective, longitudinal, observational study.Psychol. Health Med.25969–979. 10.1080/13548506.2019.1707242
55
ZhongM.ZhangQ.BaoJ.XuW. (2019). )Relationships Between Meaning in Life, Dispositional Mindfulness, Perceived Stress, and Psychological Symptoms Among Chinese Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.20734–37. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000922
Summary
Keywords
lung cancer, psychological distress, mindfulness, illness perception, perceived stress, structural equation model
Citation
Tian X, Tang L, Yi L-J, Qin X-P, Chen G-H and Jiménez-Herrera MF (2022) Mindfulness Affects the Level of Psychological Distress in Patients With Lung Cancer via Illness Perception and Perceived Stress: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Front. Psychol. 13:857659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857659
Received
18 January 2022
Accepted
03 March 2022
Published
07 April 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Annunziata Romeo, University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Ana Mafla, Cooperative University of Colombia, Colombia; Erika Rieti, Bari John Paul II Cancer Institute, National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Tian, Tang, Yi, Qin, Chen and Jiménez-Herrera.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gui-Hua Chen, CMUSH_ChenGH@163.comMaria F. Jiménez-Herrera, maria.jimenez@urv.cat
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Psycho-Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.