Abstract
The immediacy of feedback in media is emerging to enhance the interactivity of online experience for users. There is a gap in the study to explore the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on continuous intentions to use online learning from the student perspective. This study aims to fill the gap to investigate the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning. This study utilizes the technology acceptance model (TAM) and expectation theory model (ETM) to conceptualize the effect of the immediacy of feedback on student continuous intentions to use online learning in terms of the mediation effect of Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), satisfaction, and attitude of students for continuous intentions to use online learning. An online survey of higher education students with experience in online learning is conducted to test the proposed hypothesis. The collected data are analyzed by using structural equation modeling (SEM) to establish the proposed hypothesis. The findings reveal that the immediacy of feedback from the media has a strong association with PEOU, PU, students’ attitudes, students’ satisfaction, and ultimately toward the continuous intentions to use online line learning in future. The study set key theoretical and practical insights to pave the way for future research.
Introduction
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have brought a revolution in every field of life, including education in the form of online learning. Online learning is the modern distance mode of learning. Online learning is a distance mode of learning that traces back to 1800 to Isaac Pitman, who uses letters to teach students. Online learning has gained popularity and recognition for distributing educational resources across the world (; ). Online learning has gained fame and appreciation in dispensing educational resources across the world (). It is proclaimed that online learning would replace the traditional model of education in future due to the advantages associated with online learning. Online learning is the use of modern communication technologies to conduct distance modes of synchronous or asynchronous learning systems ().
With the advancement in media richness, students can experience interaction and receive immediate feedback. Media richness capabilities provide more interaction and immediacy of feedback to and from students. Online learning is a modern way of E-learning (). believes that the emergence of satellite communication, the Internet, system user interactivity, and modern storage media like compact drives (CD) has created a new type of learning environment known as digital learning. To break through times and overcome the difference in time zones, the asynchronous mode of online learning is more popular. Much research was conducted to describe the usefulness of the online system, but the online learning industry does not feel such acceptance and expansions in online learning.
The advancements in technology have added richness to the media that offers excitement to online learning. The media richness has empowered the distance education mode to online learning that online courses are a core part of many institutes across the world (). Depending on the demands and requirements, online learning can be synchronous, synchronous, collaborative, or corporate. In collaborative learning, the peers share and learn with each other. Education institutes across the world also take advantage of online learning to reach a new market. Students, on the contrary, are also interested in online learning due to the inherent advantage of cost, and access to knowledge in their space and time. Due to these two-sided advantages, online learning is increasing day by day into different shapes. Moreover, with advancements in ICT and an increase in media richness, the effectiveness of online learning is profound (; Zhou et al., 2021).
Besides, the tremendous growth of online learning has reached 17% per annum. With this tremendous growth, the failure of online learning is also observed in different prospects like acceptance by students and continuous usage intentions (). The success of online learning depends upon many factors like acceptance from students, the attitude of students toward online learning the usefulness of online learning. Different studies were conducted to assess the continuous intentions of online learning with different factors. Zheng (2022) identified the cognitive and affective factors that are important to the success of online learning with the help of underlying constructs. Mehta and Shah (2022) investigated the student perception of online learning as compared to face-to-face learning. Setiyawan and Santoso (2022) explored the acceptance of online learning by students of higher education in Indonesia. explored the effectiveness of online learning for the improvement of core competencies in medical training related to fracture-related infestation.
Studies also investigated the impacts of different types of interactions on the success of online learning (York and Richardson, 2017). The immediacy of feedback in media is an important attribute of media richness that can cause the success of online learning that is not explored by any researcher. The immediacy of feedback is an important attribute for continuous intentions to use online learning that needs to be investigated for the success of online learning. There is a need to assess the impacts of the immediacy of feedback from media on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning directly as well as by mediating effects like the ease of use, usefulness, student attitude toward online learning, and student satisfaction with online learning. There is no existing study that explores the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on student’s continuous intentions to use online learning with the integration of multiple theories like the technology acceptance model (TAM) and information system continuance (IS continuance). To fill the gap, the study explored the impact of the immediacy of feedback from media on the continuance intentions to use online learning with the integration of TAM and IS continuance theories. The study explores the desired relationship through Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), satisfaction, attitude, Perceived Usefulness (PU), and students’ problem-solving skills.
Theoretical Background
Media Richness Theory
The media richness theory shown in Figure 1 proposed by elaborates on the media’s ability to reproduce the information (). Each communication media have certain visual and social cues that describe the communication media and are used to rank the evaluation of the media. For example, telephone, E-mail, and video conferences have different visual social cues. Telephone calls cannot show the gesture and body language of the participants and are perceived as less rich as compared to video conferences. MRT theorizes that rich media are more effective in communication of equivocal issues as compared to the lesser rich media. Media richness is defined by “the ability of information to change understanding within a time interval.” The theory is used to evaluate the media based on their abilities to communicate messages and change understanding. Media that can convey ambiguous issues in lesser time as compared to the lesser rich media require more time to covey same understanding. The primary concern for selecting the media is the reduction of possible misinterpretation of the conveyed message. Media richness theory differentiates the media into rich and lean based on the authenticity of the sending of the message over the medium (Timmerman and Kruepke, 2006).
FIGURE 1
Media richness is defined based on the number of channels, immediate feedback, and level of personal communication achieved with the media. The ability of the media to facilitate understanding, effectively dealing interpretations, and resolve ambiguity makes a media lean or rich. The number of channels is described by tone, gesture, and tone are the major elements. Face-to-face communication is richer in the context of the number of channels. In context media, the video conference is much richer as compared to E-mail, text messages, and audio calls (Timmerman and Kruepke, 2006).
The immediacy of feedback from media refers to the ability of the media to enable the receiver to provide feedback on the received communication. The sender and receiver are the two important pillars of communication (
Technology Acceptance Model
The technology acceptance model (TAM) (
Expectation–Confirmation Theory
Oliver (1976, 2018) proposed the user satisfaction after a product use in terms of expectation–confirmation theory (ECT). According to the ECT theory, four constructs named “expectations, perceived performance, disconfirmation of beliefs, and satisfaction” affect the user’s intentions to continuously use a product (Oliver, 1976).
Although online learning is very common and popular, it also suffers from disconsolation. The factors that can affect the continuous intentions to use online learning are important (
Paraskeva et al. (2010) presented a multiplayer educational game to promote collaborations among students. Mellikeche et al. (2020) evaluated the Unified Model of Information System Continuance (UMISC) to evaluate the clinical information system. According to the study, the UMISC model is a robust model to observe the continuance intentions to use and satisfaction in post-adaptation of a clinical information system (Mellikeche et al., 2020).
TABLE 1
| Research context | Foundation theories | Constructs | Ref. |
| E-learning | TAM, TPB, ECT, Flow theory | Attitude, Ease of Use, Behavioral Control, Concentration, Enjoyment, Continuous Intentions | |
| MOOCs | ECT, Flow Theory | Perceived Usefulness, Confirmation, Satisfaction, Continuous Intention | |
| MOOCs | ECT | Attitude, Curiosity, Continuance Intentions, Satisfaction Usefulness, Confirmation | |
| MOOCs | ECT | Continuance Intentions, Performance proficiency, Knowledge outcome, Confirmation, Satisfaction, Social Influence | |
| MOOCs | ECT | Openness, Reputation, Enjoyment, Continuance intention, Satisfaction, Usefulness, Confirmation | |
| Online learning | Task Technology Fit (TTF), ECT | Confirmation, Usefulness, Satisfaction, Continuance Intentions, Task Technology Fit (TTF) | Wang et al., 2021 |
Related work.
Research Model and Hypotheses
The study wants to explore the impact of relative immediacy of feedback of media richness attribute on the continuous intentions to use online learning. The motivation of the study is to explore the impacts of media richness on the adaptation and acceptance of the online learning system by students to determine the future of the online education industry and directions for educational institutes.
Research Model and Hypotheses
Media richness theory and expectation–confirmation theory are used to find the relationship between the immediacy of feedback from media to the continuous intentions of using an online learning system. The direct relationship between the immediacy of feedback attribute of media and continuous intentions of using the E-learning system is determined by an intermediate relationship between perceived usefulness of the E-learning system and user satisfaction with the online learning system. The research model is shown in Figure 2 with Hypotheses H1 to H8. Hypotheses H1, H3, H4, and H5 are derived from IS continuance theory and technology acceptance model (TAM). The hypotheses H2, H6, and H7 are derived from TAM theory. These constructs are well-known antecedents of continuous intentions of information systems. The study wants to explore the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on the continuous intentions to use online learning systems with the help of these antecedents’ constructs. The impacts of student online skills on the continuance of online learning are also explored as moderators.
FIGURE 2

Conceptual model.
Research Hypothesis
The proposed study intends to explore the impacts of media richness with the immediacy of feedback on the continuous intentions of the E-learning system. TAM was extensively applied in exploring the factors that affect the success of online learning in terms of users’ continuous intentions to use online learning (
Hypothesis 1 (H1): Immediacy of feedback in online learning is positively correlated with the student Perceived Ease of use (PEU) of online learning
Hypothesis 2 (H2): Immediacy of feedback in online learning is positively correlated with the student Perceived usefulness (PU) of the online learning
Satisfaction is one of the important parameters that determine the success in terms of its future adaptation (
Hypothesis 3 (H3): Student Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) of online learning system is positively correlated with the student’s satisfaction with online learning
Hypothesis 4 (H4): Student satisfaction is positively correlated with students’ continuous intentions to use an online learning system
Attitude is shaped by students’ experience and assessment of the system in terms of PU of the online learning system (
Hypothesis 5 (H5): Perceived Usefulness (PU) of online learning system is positively correlated with the student’s attitude toward online learning
Hypothesis 6 (H6): Students’ attitudes toward online systems is positively correlated with student’s continuous intentions to use online learning
In the case of online learning, the student’s satisfaction and attitude toward the online learning system would determine the students’ intentions toward the online system (
Hypothesis 7 (H7): Immediacy of feedback from media is positively correlated with students’ continuous intentions to use online learning
Students’ interpersonal skills have subtle impacts on the adaptation of new technologies in the form of online learning (
Hypothesis 8 (H8): Student problem-solving skills be positively correlated to enhance the immediacy of feedback of media relationship with students’ continuous intentions to use online learning
Definitions of Constructs
The operational definition of the construct is defined in Table 2, with their source.
TABLE 2
| Constructs | Operational definition | Source |
| The immediacy of feedback from media | The capacity of the media to allow participants to provide feedback immediately | |
| Perceived usefulness | The level to which a technology is helpful in the completion of a task, as compared to existing solutions | |
| Satisfaction | The degree to which users are satisfied with the technology | |
| Continuous usage intentions | The degree to which user’s behavioral tendency to adopt online learning in the future | |
| Attitude | My personal feeling about a technology | |
| Perceived Ease of Use | The level to which a technology is easy to use as compared to existing |
Operational definition of constructs.
Methodology
To find the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning, a survey was conducted among students with experience with online learning. The objective of this investigation is to explore the impacts of the immediacy of the feedback feature of media on the success of online learning from the students’ perspective.
Study Instrument
A survey instrument is used to establish the hypotheses of the study. Different items for each construct of the study are used and given in Table 3. The identified constructs are supported by theoretical background.
TABLE 3
| Constructs | Number of items | Source |
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) | 4 | |
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 3 | Oliver, 1976, 2018; |
| Attitude (AT) | 3 | Oliver, 1976, 2018; |
| The immediacy of Feedback (IF) | 3 | |
| Continuous Intentions to use online Learning (CIOL) | 3 | |
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 4 |
Constructs with items.
Participants
The sample population of the university students enrolled in the graduate or postgraduate level who have experience of at least one semester in the online learning system are selected. The students of developing countries enrolled in a higher education degree program with experience in online learning are the target population of the study. The participants of the study are selected who have experience with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and WebEx. The participants have been selected who have experience in online learning for at least one semester.
Demographics Data of Participants
This section describes the demographic data about responding students. The survey is conducted using the Internet with the help of the google form. The survey is distributed among students with 1118 responses. The survey is conducted by students studying in Chinese universities. The survey is taken immediately after COVID-19, and students have sufficient experience with online learning. The survey is conducted from September to October 2021. It is observed out of the total respondents, 53.5% were female and 46.5 were male students. Most of the respondents are of 21 to 24 years. The target students are selected from four faculties, namely “Engineering and Technologies,” “Natural Sciences,” “Faculty of Business,” and “Faculty of Law.” The respondents are students enrolled in undergraduate and master’s programs.
Results
The structural equation modeling (SEM) is applied to test the hypothesis. This section evaluates the reliability and validity of the model proposed by the study. This section also presents the structural model to establish the hypotheses of the study. Measurements and structural models are simulated using the SmartPLS
Common Method Bias
Inner VIFs values from the collinearity test of the model are also checked for internal reliability. All the inner VIF’s values from the collinearity test are less than 3.3; therefore, the model is free from common method bias. The measurement model is shown in Figure 3, with a factor loading of each item with every construct.
FIGURE 3

Measurement model.
Reliability Analysis
The reliability and validity of the model are evaluated using 10% of aggregate data. Cronbach’s alpha test and composite reliability (CR) are used to check the validity through a pilot study. The value of Cronbach’s alpha above 0.7 is high and between 0.7 and 0.35 is acceptable. The six constructs of the study with Cronbach’s alpha values with factor loading are shown in Table 4. For all the constructs, the values of Cronbach’s alpha are higher than 0.7. The values of Cronbach’s alpha for all the constructs are in the acceptable range. The acceptable Cronbach’s alpha values for all the constructs proved the internal consistency of the constructs. In Table 4, the CR of all the constructs is also given which shows the reliability of the study.
TABLE 4
| Constructs | Items | Factor loading | Cronbach’s Alpha value | CR | AVE |
| PEU | PEU_1 | 0.942 | 0.952 | 0.965 | 0.873 |
| PEU_2 | 0.936 | ||||
| PEU_3 | 0.936 | ||||
| PEU_4 | 0.924 | ||||
| PU | PU_1 | 0.941 | 0.969 | 0.977 | 0.914 |
| PU_1 | 0.966 | ||||
| PU_1 | 0.960 | ||||
| PU_1 | 0.957 | ||||
| SAT | SAT_1 | 0.928 | 0.911 | 0.944 | 0.848 |
| SAT_2 | 0.884 | ||||
| SAT_3 | 0.950 | ||||
| AT | AT_1 | 0.951 | 0.933 | 0.957 | 0.881 |
| AT_2 | 0.912 | ||||
| AT_3 | 0.951 | ||||
| IF | IF_1 | 0.902 | 0.908 | 0.942 | 0.844 |
| IF_2 | 0.897 | ||||
| IF_3 | 0.957 | ||||
| CIOL | CIOL_1 | 0.936 | 0.934 | 0.958 | 0.884 |
| CIOL_1 | 0.926 | ||||
| CIOL_3 | 0.958 |
Reliability analysis.
Validity Analysis
Validity measures the accuracy of the model to assess the constructs to which extent they measure what they intend to measure. Convergent validity is measured using average value extracted (AVE). The AVE measures the extent to which items converge to measure their corresponding constructs. AVE is the measure of how much variance can be extracted on average from the items to measure constructs, which should be at least 50%. Therefore, a value of AVE above 0.50 is acceptable. From Table 5, it can be observed the value of AVE for all the constructs is above 0.5, and the reliability of the model in terms of AVE is in an acceptable range. Discriminant validity is observed in terms of Fornell-Larcker criteria, cross-loading, and heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT). In Table 6, the square root of the AVE of each construct (highlighted) is higher than all other correlations underneath. Hence, the model validity is proved by Fornell–Larcker criteria. The items loading with their corresponding construct are highlighted. It can be observed that the loading factor of the items with their corresponding construct is higher than with other constructs in the study. The reliability of the model in terms of cross-loading is also proved. The reliability of the model in terms of the heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT) is also given in Table 5, which states that HTMT values of the constructs should be less than 0.85 for a model to be reliable. All the heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT) values for each construct are lower than 0.85, and the model is also reliable in terms of HTMT ratio.
TABLE 5
| AT | CIOL | IF | PEU | PU | SAT | |
| AT | ||||||
| CIOL | 0.539 | |||||
| IF | 0.355 | 0.675 | ||||
| PEU | 0.489 | 0.640 | 0.452 | |||
| PU | 0.678 | 0.329 | 0.523 | 0.248 | ||
| SAT | 0.272 | 0.638 | 0.590 | 0.632 | 0.237 |
Heterotrait–monotrait ratio.
TABLE 6
| AT | CIOL | IF | PEU | PU | SAT | |
| AT | 0.938 | |||||
| CIOL | 0.514 | 0.940 | ||||
| IF | 0.338 | 0.628 | 0.919 | |||
| PEU | 0.468 | 0.607 | 0.428 | 0.934 | ||
| PU | 0.652 | 0.319 | 0.495 | 0.240 | 0.956 | |
| SAT | 0.264 | 0.596 | 0.539 | 0.604 | 0.229 | 0.921 |
Fornell–Larcker criterion.
The square root of the AVE of each construct (highlighted) is higher than all other correlations underneath.
Structural Model
Now, the hypothesis relationship is assessed by the structural model as shown in Figure 4. Each relationship is analyzed in terms of direct, indirect, and total effect of each mediation. The direct relationship is given in Table 7.
FIGURE 4

Result of hypothesis testing.
TABLE 7
| Path | β | T statistics | P-values |
| IF→PEU | 0.428 | 3.757 | 0.000 |
| IF→PU | 0.495 | 4.600 | 0.000 |
| PEU→SAT | 0.604 | 6.324 | 0.000 |
| SAT→CIOL | 0.327 | 2.601 | 0.009 |
| PU→AT | 0.652 | 6.452 | 0.000 |
| AT→CIOL | 0.311 | 3.262 | 0.001 |
| IF→CIOL | 0.347 | 2.743 | 0.006 |
Direct relationship.
Mediation Analysis
To observe the mediation effects of construct on relationships, the mediation relationship is given in Table 8 in the form of indirect relationships. From the statistics given in Table 8, it is observed that IF→PU→AT→CIOL (β = 0.100, t = 2.401, p = 0.016), IF→PU→AT (β = 0.323, t = 4.950, p = 0.000), PU→AT→CIOL (β = 0.203, t = 3.911, p = 0.000), IF→PEU→SAT (β = 0.258, t = 2.734, p = 0.006), PEU→SAT→CIOL (β = 0.197, t = 2.325, p = 0.020) play a significant mediation role while the path from immediacy of feedback to Perceived Ease of Use to satisfaction has no significant mediation role on relationship between immediacy of feedback to continuous intentions to use online learning. However, the total effects derived by derived and indirect effects are given in Table 9, which reveals that the Hypothesis 1, IFF→PEU (β = 0.428, t = 3.757, p = 0.000), Hypothesis 2, IF→PU (β = 0.495, t = 4.600, p = 0.000), Hypothesis 3, PEU→SAT (β = 0.604, t = 6.324, p = 0.000), Hypothesis 4, SAT→CIOL (β = 0.327, t = 2.601, p = 0.009), Hypothesis 5, PU→AT (β = 0.652, t = 6.452, p = 0.000), Hypothesis 6, AT→CIOL (β = 0.311, t = 3.262, p = 0.001), and Hypothesis 7, IFF→CIOL (β = 0.347, t = 2.743, p = 0.006) are also accepted.
TABLE 8
| Path | β | T statistics | P-values |
| IF→PU→AT→CIOL | 0.100 | 2.401 | 0.016 |
| IF→PU→AT | 0.323 | 4.950 | 0.000 |
| PU→AT→CIOL | 0.203 | 3.911 | 0.000 |
| IF→PEU→SAT→CIOL | 0.084 | 2.987 | 0.003 |
| IF→PEU→SAT | 0.258 | 2.734 | 0.006 |
| PEU→SAT→COIL | 0.197 | 2.325 | 0.020 |
Indirect relationship.
TABLE 9
| Path | β | T statistics | P-values |
| IF→PEU | 0.428 | 3.757 | 0.000 |
| IF→PU | 0.495 | 4.600 | 0.000 |
| PEU→SAT | 0.604 | 6.324 | 0.000 |
| SAT→CIOL | 0.327 | 2.601 | 0.009 |
| PU→AT | 0.652 | 6.452 | 0.000 |
| AT→CIOL | 0.311 | 3.262 | 0.001 |
| IF→CIOL | 0.532 | 5.107 | 0.000 |
Total effect.
Impact of Moderator
This study also explores the impact of problem-solving skills on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning. To explore, the problem-solving skills of the students are used as a moderator. The effect of the moderator on the continuous intentions to use online learning with media immediacy of feedback is explored. The results are shown in Table 10. The improvements in the insignificance of the existing relationship proved to accept the Hypothesis that Student problem-solving skills will significantly enhance the positive relationship between student’s attitude toward online systems and students’ perceived usefulness of the online learning system.
TABLE 10
| Path | β | T statistics | P-values | |
| H8 | IF→CIOL | 0.448 | 3.857 | 0.000 |
Impact of moderator.
Discussion and Conclusion
This study explores the impact of the immediacy of feedback on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning. This study uses the technology acceptance model (TAM) and information system continuance (IS Continuance) theory. IS continuance is the extension of ECT theory to determine the impact of user satisfaction, confirmation, and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) on user continuous intentions to use an information system. Both the IS and TAM theories are also used as mediation effects on the immediacy of feedback from media and student continuance intention to use online learning, which is explored in the next section.
Initially, the IS continuance theory is used to determine the impact of the immediacy of feedback (IF) on the continuous intentions to use online learning (CIOL). The impact of the immediacy of feedback on the Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) of online learning is determined by Hypothesis 1. Hypothesis 1 states that (IF→PEU) “Immediacy of feedback in online learning is positively correlated with the student Perceived Ease of use (PEU) of online learning.” The statistics (β = 0.428, t = 3.757, p = 0.000) after data analysis reveals accept hypothesis 1 that immediacy of feedback is positively correlated with the student’s perceived Ease of Use (PEU) of the online learning system. Once Hypothesis 1 is established, the next is to explore the impact of PEU on online learning on students’ satisfaction with online learning. The impact of PEU on online learning is explored by Hypothesis 2 which states that “student Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) of online learning system is positively correlated with the student’s satisfaction with online learning.” The statistics related to hypothesis 3, PEU→SAT, (β = 0.604, t = 6.324, p = 0.000) reveal to accept hypothesis 2. The PEU relationship with the student’s satisfaction with online learning is established. The next is to explore the relationship between the student’s satisfaction with online learning and the student’s continuous intentions to use the online learning system. For this purpose, Hypothesis 4 (H4) states that “student’s satisfaction of online learning is positively correlated with students’ continuous intentions to use online learning system” is tested. The statistics related to Hypothesis 4, SAT→CIOL (β = 0.456, t = 3.567, p = 0.001), reveal to accept the hypothesis 4. The indirect effect of mediation IF→PEU→SAT→CIOL (β = 0.084, t = 2.987, p = 0.003) reveals that the mediation path of Immediacy of feedback to Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) to satisfaction and continuous intentions to use online learning is also significant. The findings are in line with the previous study (
Now, the TAM theory is used to determine the impact of immediacy of feedback on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning through Perceived Usefulness (PU) and attitude. The impact of the immediacy of feedback is explored through students’ Perceived Usefulness (PU) of online learning and students’ attitude toward the continuous intentions to use online learning. Initially, the relationship between the immediacy of feedback with the student’s perceived Usefulness (PU) of online learning is explored through hypothesis 2. Hypothesis 2 (H2) states that “Immediacy of feedback in online learning is positively correlated with the student Perceived usefulness (PU) of the online learning.” Hypothesis 2 is accepted with statistics IF→PU (β = 0.495, t = 4.600, p = 0.000). Once hypothesis 2 is established, the next is to explore the impact of the student’s Perceived Usefulness (PU) of online learning on the student’s attitude toward the online learning system. The relationship between the student’s PU toward attitude is determined by hypothesis 5. Hypothesis 5 (H5) states that “student Perceived Usefulness (PU) of online learning online learning system is positively correlated with the student’s Attitude toward online learning.” The statistics related to hypothesis 5 (H5), PU→AT (β = 0.652, t = 6.452, p = 0.000), reveal to accept the hypothesis 5. With the establishment of hypothesis 5, the next step is to explore the relationship between students’ attitudes toward online learning and students’ continuous intentions to use online learning. The relationship is explored by hypothesis. Hypothesis 6 (H6) states that “student’s Attitude toward online system has a positive relationship with student’s continuous intentions to use online learning.” The statistics related to hypothesis 6, AT→CIOL (β = 0.311, t = 3.262, p = 0.001), reveal to accept the hypothesis. Hypothesis 6 is established and reveals that there is a significant positive relationship between the student attitude toward online learning and students’ continuous intentions to use online learning. The mediation effect of students’ Perceived Usefulness (PU) and students’ attitude toward continuous intentions to use online learning is significant. The mediation effect of IF→PU→AT→CIOL is significant and plays a positive role in continuous intention to use online learning with the immediacy of feedback.
The next is to explore the direct relationship between the immediacy of feedback on the student’s continuous intentions to use online learning. The relationship between the immediacy of feedback and continuous intentions to use online learning is described by Hypothesis 7. Hypothesis 7 (H7) states that “Immediacy of feedback of media has a significant relationship with students’ continuous intentions to use online learning.” The statistics related to H7, IF→CIOL (β = 0.347, t = 2.743, p = 0.006), reveal to accept the hypothesis. This is stated in terms of hypothesis 8. Hypothesis 8 (H8) states that “student problem-solving skills will significantly enhance the positive relationship immediacy of feedback of media and student’s continuous intentions to use online learning.” The statistics related to hypothesis 8, IFF→CIOL (β = 0.347, t = 2.743, p = 0.006), reveal that there is a significant relationship between the student’s problem-solving skills on the student’s continuous intentions to use online learning with the immediacy of feedback in online learning. The results explored in this study also agree with existing studies. The findings related to continuous intentions to use online learning are in line with findings of Wang et al. (2021).
The study explores the relationship between the immediacy of feedback from media on continuous intentions to use online learning in future from students’ perspectives. The relationship is explored directly as well as through different mediation roles of immediacy feedback on Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), satisfaction, attitude, and finally the continuous intentions to use online learning. The eight hypotheses were made using a conceptual model based on technology acceptance model (TAM) and information system continuance theory. The survey was conducted with the target graduate and master’s level students. The measurement model is reliable in both convergent and discriminatory validity. The structural model reveals that all the hypotheses from H1 to H7 are accepted based on T-test and P-values. It is observed that students’ problem-solving skills have a significant relationship between the immediacy of feedback and continuous intentions to use online learning. The effect of immediacy on continuous intentions to use online learning is significant, and the relationship is improved with student problem-solving skills. The findings of the study that immediacy of feedback is positively related with PEOU and PU that are positively related with attitude and satisfaction that are positively associated with continuous intentions to use online learning are in accordance with findings of the previous studies (
Implication, Limitation, and Future Research
Theoretical Implications
This study offers two contributions that help to advance the evolution of online learning. First, the positive impacts of the immediacy of feedback from media on student continuous intentions to use online learning. Second, this study adds to the scant literature on the impacts of the immediacy of feedback characteristic of media on student continuous intentions to use online learning from the student perspective, by empirical investigation. Studies were conducted to explore the students’ perceptions about online learning (Mehta and Shah, 2022) as compared to face-to-face learning and different factors affecting the success of online learning, but the impact of the immediacy of feedback is not explored yet. The previous literature focuses on the identification of factors that affects the students’ continuous intentions to use online learning (
The second contribution is the impact of the immediacy of feedback on continuous intentions to use online learning through different mediation roles of PEOU, PU, satisfaction, and attitude toward continuous intentions to use online learning. Many studies apply the TAM model to explore success factors for the adaptation of E-learning with different moderating roles (
Moreover, this study explores the relationship between the immediacy of feedback from media on students’ continuous intentions to use online learning in terms of existing models and theories. The result of this study also strengthens the existing model and paves the way toward the development of a new model to explore the impacts of media richness on students’ continuance intention to use online learning. Apart from media richness, this study also stresses the need for other factors that strengthen the intention to continuously use online learning that would determine the success of online learning in future.
Practical Implications
This study has many practical implementations for the designers, developers, and teachers. This study stresses the importance of immediacy of the feedback on the success of online learning in terms of students’ intentions to use online learning. In the past, different efforts were made to explore the directions of improvements in online learning (
The impacts of human–computer interaction (HCI) on the success of online learning are explored (
This study also identifies the important factor in the success of online learning. The findings of the study provide insight for the technologists and course designers to take care of the importance of the immediacy of feedback. The identified findings are important in that it determines the success of online learning. To motivates students for their continuous intentions to use online learning, the immediacy of feedback is important for the successful implementation of the online learning program.
Limitations and Further Research
This study explores the impact of the immediacy of feedback on continuous intentions to continuously use online learning from the student’s perspective. The continuous intention to use online learning determines the success of online learning. The study explores the impacts from a student perspective only. The teacher’s intentions to use online learning are also important that are not explored due to the limited scope of the study. There is a need to explore the intentions of the teachers to use online learning in future with the immediacy of feedback, which is not part of the study. There is also a need to assess the impacts of the immediacy of feedback on continuous intentions to use online learning with other important variables like content, students’ motivations, and students’ involvement.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of College of Art and Design, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
Both authors contributed substantially in the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865680/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Abdul RahmanN. S.AdliN. S.Mat RaffeiA. F.IsmailN. S. N. (2020). Factors Determination MOOCs Continuance Intention: a Proposed Conceptual Framework.IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.769:012052. 10.1088/1757-899X/769/1/012052
2
Al-AdwanA. S.AlbelbisiN. A.HujranO.Al-RahmiW. M.AlkhalifahA. (2021). Developing a Holistic Success Model for Sustainable E-Learning: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach.Sustainability13:9453.
3
AlebeisatF.AltarawnehH.AlhalhouliZ. T.QatawnehA.AlmahasneM. (2022). The Impact of Human and Computer Interaction on eLearning Quality.Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.1658–69. 10.3991/ijim.v16i04.27309
4
Al-GahtaniS. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: a structural equation model.Appl. Comput. Inform.1227–50. 10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001
5
AlmahamidS.RubF. (n.d.). Factors that Determine Continuance Intention to use E-learning System: An Empirical Investigation.
6
Al-MaroofR. S.AlhumaidK.SalloumS. (2020). The Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning, from Two Different Perspectives.Educ. Sci.11:6. 10.3390/educsci
7
Al-RahmiW. M.YahayaN.AldraiweeshA. A.AlamriM. M.AljarboaN. A.AlturkiU.et al (2019). Integrating Technology Acceptance Model with Innovation Diffusion Theory: an Empirical Investigation on Students’. Intention to Use E-Learning Systems.IEEE Access726797–26809. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
8
AlraimiK. M.ZoH.CiganekA. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: the role of openness and reputation.Comput. Educ.8028–38. 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2014.08.006
9
AshrafiA.ZareravasanA.Rabiee SavojiS.AmaniM. (2020). Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): a multi-perspective framework.Interact. Learn. Environ.20201–23. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1734028
10
AustermannJ.MertinsB. (2014). Technology Acceptance Model Revised-An Investigation on the Managerial Attitudes towards Using Social Media in Innovation Processes.Sweden: Linnaeus University.
11
AziM. L.KojimaK. E.PesántezR.CarabelliG.BorensO.McFadyenI.et al (2022). Effectiveness of an Online Course on Fracture-Related Infections.J. Eur. CME11:2024682. 10.1080/21614083.2021.2024682
12
BarberR. J. (2018). Media Richness and Feedback Seeking Behaviours.New Zealand: University of Canterbury.
13
BhattacherjeeA. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: an Expectation-Confirmation Model Author(s): anol Bhattacherjee Source.MIS Q.25351–370.
14
Business SchoolH.AliS. (2017). E-learning Implementation Barriers: Impact of Student’s Individual Cultural Orientation on E-learning Device Acceptance.Ph.D. thesis. United Kingdom: University of Reading.
15
ÇevikY.HaşlamanT.ÇelikS. (2015). The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities.Stud. Educ. Eval.4423–35. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.12.002
16
ChaiJ.LiuJ. N. K.NgaiE. W. T. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature.Expert Syst. Appl.403872–3885. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040
17
ChenM.WangX.WangJ.ZuoC.TianJ.CuiY. (2021). Factors Affecting College Students’. Continuous Intention to Use Online Course Platform. SN.Comput. Sci.2:114. 10.1007/s42979-021-00498-8
18
ChengY. M. (2021). Can gamification and interface design aesthetics lead to MOOCs’ success?Undefined631346–1375. 10.1108/ET-09-2020-0278
19
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirtments Media Richness and Structural Design.Manage. Sci.32554–571.
20
DaiH. M.TeoT.RappaN. A.HuangF. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’ continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: a modified expectation confirmation model perspective.Comput. Educ.150:103850. 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103850
21
DanejiA. A.AyubA. F. M.KhambariM. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC).Knowl. Manag. E-Learn.11201–214. 10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.010
22
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Q.13319–339. 10.2307/249008
23
DennisA. R.KinneyS. T. (1998). Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: the Effects of Cues. Feedback, and Task Equivocality.Inf. Syst. Res.9256–274. 10.1287/isre.9.3.256
24
FajfarP.CampitelliG.LabollitaM. (2012). Effects of immediacy of feedback on estimations and performance.Aust. J. Psychol.64169–177. 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00048.x
25
FathemaN. (2015). Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions.J. Online Learn. Teach.11210–232.23.
26
FryK. (2001). E-learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects.Educ. Train.43233–239. 10.1108/EUM0000000005484
27
GiyantoG.HeliawatyL.RubiniB. (2020). The effectiveness of online learning by EdPuzzle in polymer materials on students’ problem-solving skills. IOP Conference Series: materials.Sci. Eng.959:012006. 10.1088/1757-899X/959/1/012006
28
GovindasamyT. (2001). Successful implementation of e-Learning: pedagogical considerations.Internet High Educ.4287–299. 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9
29
GuptaA.YousafA.MishraA. (2020). How pre-adoption expectancies shape post-adoption continuance intentions: an extended expectation-confirmation model.Int. J. Inf. Manage.52:102094. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102094
30
HabesM.ElareshiM.YoussefE.AliS.QudahM. (2022). Social Impact of Videos at New Media Platforms on the eLearning Acceptance during the Covid-19.Information.Sciences11913–925. 10.18576/isl/110322
31
HuangC. H. (2021). Exploring the continuous usage intention of online learning platforms from the perspective of social capital.Information12:141. 10.3390/info12040141
32
JoeF.Hair (2022). SmartPLS. Available Online at: https://www.smartpls.com/(accessed February 15, 2022).
33
JunjieZ. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: an extended ECM perspective.Australas. J. Educ. Technol.33127–135.
34
KahaiS. S.CooperR. B. (2003). Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: the Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality.Manag. Inf. Syst.20263–299.
35
KurdiB. AlAlshuridehM.SalloumS. A. (2020). Investigating a theoretical framework for e-learning technology acceptance.Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng.106484–6496. 10.11591/IJECE.V10I6.PP6484-6496
36
KurdiB. AlAlshuridehM.SalloumS. A.ObeidatZ. M.Al-dweeriR. M. (2020). An empirical investigation into examination of factors influencing university students’ behavior towards elearning acceptance using SEM approach.Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.1419–41. 10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11115
37
LeeM. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning.Comput. Educ.54506–516. 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.09.002
38
LiaoY. K.WuW. Y.LeT. Q.PhungT. T. T. (2022). The Integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Value-Based Adoption Model to Study the Adoption of E-Learning: the Moderating Role of e-WOM.Sustainability14:815. 10.3390/su14020815
39
LuY.WangB.VackarR. C.LuY. (2019). Understanding Key Drivers Of Mooc Satisfaction And Continuance Intention To Use.J. Electron. Commer.20105–117.
40
MehtaD.ShahH. (2022). “Students’ Perceptions about Online Learning,” in ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, (Virginia: George Mason University).
41
MellikecheS.de Fatima MarinH.BenítezS. E.de LiraA. C. O.de QuirósF. G. B.DegouletP. (2020). External validation of the unified model of information systems continuance (UMISC): an international comparison.Int. J. Med. Inform.134:103927. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.006
42
OghumaA. P.Libaque-SaenzC. F.WongS. F.ChangY. (2016). An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging.Telemat. Inform.3334–47. 10.1016/J.TELE.2015.05.006
43
OliverR. L. (1976). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation.Am. J. Appl. Psychol.62480–486. 10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.480
44
OliverR. L. (2018). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.J. Mark. Res.17460–469. 10.1177/002224378001700405
45
PanigrahiR.SrivastavaP. R.PanigrahiP. K. (2021). Effectiveness of e-learning: the mediating role of student engagement on perceived learning effectiveness.Undefined341840–1862. 10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0380
46
ParaskevaF.MysirlakiS.PapagianniA. (2010). Multiplayer online games as educational tools: facing new challenges in learning.Comput. Educ.54498–505. 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.09.001
47
PersadaS. F.MirajaB. A.NadlifatinR.BelgiawanP. F.Perwira RediA. A. N.LinS.-C. (2021). Determinants of students’ intention to continue using online private tutoring: an expectation-confirmation model (ECM) approach. Technol. Knowl. Learn.10.1007/s10758-021-09548-9
48
SetiyawanJ.SantosoH. B. (2022). Factors Affecting user accpetance of e-Learning implementation in the Context of Higher: a case study of Health Science.J. Teach. Educ.221–19. 10.9743/jeo.2022.19.1.9
49
SugiartaK.ArdinaC.Komang WiratamaI. (2022). “Fully online E-learning model development as an online learning model during the Covid-19 pandemic,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2021 (iCAST-SS 2021), Kalimantan Timur.
50
TimmermanC. E.KruepkeK. A. (2006). Computer-assisted instruction, media richness, and college student performance.Commun. Educ.5573–104. 10.1080/03634520500489666
51
WanL.XieS.ShuA. (2020). Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: when UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model.SAGE Open101–15. 10.1177/2158244020941858
52
WangT.LinC. L.SuY. S. (2021). Continuance intention of university students and online learning during the covid-19 pandemic: a modified expectation confirmation model perspective.Sustainability13:4586. 10.3390/su13084586
53
WengC.TsaiC.-C.WengA. (2015). Social support as a neglected e-learning motivator affecting trainee’s decisions of continuous intentions of usage.Australas. J. Educ. Technol.31177–192.
54
YorkC. S.RichardsonJ. C. (2017). Experienced Online Instructors’. Perceptions of Influencing Factors.J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw.1683–98.
55
ZhengR. Z. (2022). “Exploring affective and cognitive measurements in global online learning,” in Measurement Methodologies to Assess the Effectiveness of Global Online Learning, edsIsaiasP.IssaT.KommersP. (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 162–198. 10.4018/978-1-7998-8661-7.ch007
56
ZhouS.ZhouY.ZhuH. (2021). Predicting Chinese University Students’ E-Learning Acceptance and Self-Regulation in Online English Courses: evidence From Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) During COVID-19.SAGE Open111–15. 10.1177/21582440211061379
Summary
Keywords
immediacy of feedback, technology acceptance model, information system continuance, online learning environment, COVID-19
Citation
Yu R and Cai X (2022) Impact of Immediacy of Feedback on Continuous Intentions to Use Online Learning From the Student Perspective. Front. Psychol. 13:865680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865680
Received
30 January 2022
Accepted
09 May 2022
Published
30 June 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Isabella Giulia Franzoi, University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Belgin Bal İncebacak, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Turkey; Abdul Rauf, Zhejiang University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Yu and Cai.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rong Yu, yurong@sqnu.edu.cnXuerui Cai, cxredu@outlook.com
This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.