Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 07 March 2024
Sec. Educational Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Employment Sustainability and Teaching/Learning Techniques in Higher Education Institutions View all 5 articles

Editorial: Employment sustainability and teaching/learning techniques in higher education institutions

  • 1School of Business, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Management, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • 3College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Aims and objectives of the Research Topic

The intersection of education and employability takes center stage in our ever-evolving global landscape. This Research Topic delves into the intricate dance between higher education institutions (HEIs) and industry demands, aiming to unearth sustainable solutions to bridge the skills gap and prepare graduates for the complexities of the modern workforce.

The initial call for this Research Topic addressed the ongoing challenges faced by employers who seek competent adaptable employees. It pinpointed the perceived shortcomings of the education system, urging HEIs to align their curricula with the dynamic needs of industries. The emphasis on intercultural and interdisciplinary approaches was underscored, recognizing the importance of preparing graduates for a multicultural rapidly changing job market.

Outcome

This Research Topic provides opportunities for educationalists and researchers to shed light on the challenges and opportunities in the education sector. The first article (Park), exploring the re-entry experiences of kinesiology professionals, brings to light the challenges and triumphs encountered upon returning to their home country. The findings resonate with the re-acculturation theory, emphasizing the importance of addressing issues faced by professionals re-entering academia. The second article (Jamaludin et al.) focuses on reshaping the curriculum for applied industry-focused training (AiF). It highlights the current vagueness surrounding AiF and proposes a framework rooted in an industry-based curriculum, employability skills, and international best practices. The framework aims to guide ministries, educators, and industries in enhancing AiF practices for a more responsive and effective outcome.

The third article (Wang et al.) delves into the demographic migration of young teachers from Taiwan to China. Employing a push-pull-mooring model, it unravels the factors influencing the decision of young teachers, shedding light on the dynamic interplay of forces contributing to this cross-border academic migration. The fourth article (Zhou et al.) explores the intricate relationships between emotional intelligence, career decision-making self-efficacy, and employability. It highlights the significance of emotional intelligence in enhancing employability, emphasizing how career decision-making self-efficacy plays a pivotal role in shaping both.

Conclusion

As we weave through these diverse articles, a cohesive narrative emerges—an urgent need for HEIs to adapt and innovate in tandem with industry demands. The call for sustainable education practices echoes throughout, urging institutions to embrace multicultural perspectives, interdisciplinary approaches, and a keen focus on developing not only technical skills but also the emotional intelligence and self-efficacy crucial for navigating the modern workforce.

Moving forward

This Research Topic serves as a compass, guiding HEIs, policymakers, and industry stakeholders toward collaborative strategies that nurture a skilled, adaptable, and culturally aware workforce. The synthesis of these articles invites us to reflect on the symbiotic relationship between education and employability, urging us to bridge the gap and foster a future in which graduates seamlessly transition into the workforce, equipped to thrive in our multicultural and ever-changing world.

Author contributions

AG: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. MB: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. AJ: Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: employment sustainability, higher education institutions (HEIs), teaching techniques, learning techniques in soft robotics, Malaysia, China

Citation: Ghouri AM, Bhatti MA and Juhari AS (2024) Editorial: Employment sustainability and teaching/learning techniques in higher education institutions. Front. Psychol. 15:1373916. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1373916

Received: 20 January 2024; Accepted: 13 February 2024;
Published: 07 March 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Douglas F. Kauffman, Medical University of the Americas, United States

Copyright © 2024 Ghouri, Bhatti and Juhari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Arsalan Mujahid Ghouri, arsalan.ghouri@ymail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.