ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Environmental Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1433280

Overcoming heuristics that hinder people's acceptance of climatechange-mitigation technologies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Madgeburg, Germany
  • 2Faculty of Humanities, Social Science and Education, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Madgeburg, Germany
  • 3Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF), Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
  • 4Independent researcher, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The overall research objective of the present study is the investigation of the effects of a strongly expressed restriction-oriented climate change mitigation heuristic (SER heuristic) on people's attitude toward and acceptance of climate change mitigation technologies such as Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). Furthermore, we want to examine the effects of a scenario-based communication intervention approach on the promotion of a supportive attitude toward and acceptance of CCU, especially referring to people characterized by a SER heuristic. Against this background, we present empirical findings based on an online experiment including a scenario-based intervention in an initial sample of 401 German participants. In line with our expectations, our findings show that participants characterized by a SER heuristic report a significantly lower supportive attitude toward CCU as well as a lower acceptance of CCU, compared to participants who are not characterized by a SER heuristic. Furthermore, our findings imply the examined scenario-based communication intervention approach to be an effective tool for the promotion of participants' supportive attitude toward CCU and acceptance of CCU. Taken together, the present study provides further valuable insights for the promotion of people's supportive attitude toward as well as of their acceptance of necessary new climate change mitigation technologies such as CCU.

Keywords: Climate protection, Climate change mitigation technologies, Intervention evaluation, restriction heuristic, vignette methodology

Received: 15 May 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Blöbaum, Schmidt, Boecher, Arlinghaus, Krause and Matthies. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anke Blöbaum, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Madgeburg, 39106, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.