ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1436549
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Sports Science: Latest Findings and New Scientific Proposals- Volume IIIView all 9 articles
Amateurs exhibit greater psychomotor efficiency than novices: evidence from EEG during a visuomotor Task
Provisionally accepted- 1International Football Education School, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Hebei Province, China
- 2Center of Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 3Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 4School of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, Beijing, China
- 5School of Recreation and Community Sport, Jilin Sport University, Changchun, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The goal of this study was to examine the neural activities, which contribute to performance efficiency in the early stages of motor skill learning, such as amateur versus novice. To achieve this goal, electroencephalography (EEG) was employed to compare the differences in EEG power that can be used to assess neural excitability between amateur and novice golfers during a visuomotor task (i.e., golf putting task).16 amateurs (9 females, 7 males, mean age = 20.81 ± 1.83; an intermediate skill level with an average handicap of 33 ± 5.68 and 3.81 ± 1.83 years of experience) and 16 novice golfers (9 females, 7 males, mean age = 22.25 ± 1.61; no prior experience in golf or formal training) were asked to perform a golf putting task while their EEG was recorded. During the warm-up session, each participant determined their individual putting distance, targeting a 40-60% success rate. Once established, participants were asked to perform 10 putts per block across 6 blocks in the experimental session. The results of the study indicated that amateur golfers demonstrated: (1) higher Fz Theta power, (2) higher Fz, Pz, T7, T8 Alpha 2 power, (3) higher Mu 2 power, and (4) higher SMR power compared with novices during motor preparation. These findings suggest that amateur golfers exhibited reduced motor programming (as indicated by higher Alpha 2 power at Fz and Mu 2 power), reduced verbal-analytical engagement (higher T7 Alpha 2 power), reduced conscious perception of sensations (higher SMR power), reduced visuospatial processes (higher Alpha 2 power at Pz and T8), and enhanced cognitive control of sustained attention (higher Fz Theta power).Furthermore, these findings support the notion that the achievement of psychomotor efficiency involves the selective activation and inhibition of neuromotor processes.The study outcomes not only contribute to a broader understanding of the refinement of neuromotor processes during the transition from novice to amateur, but also specify neuromotor processes that can be categorized within the framework of psychomotor efficiency.
Keywords: Neuromotor Processes, Motor performance, motor learning, Attention, Neurofeedback
Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lu, Hagan, Cheng, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kuo Pin Wang, Center of Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, 33619, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.