Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

This article is part of the Research TopicLearning for DemocracyView all 10 articles

Personal and Institutional Factors as Determinants of Civic Engagement among University Students

Provisionally accepted
yang  linyang lin1danabekov  aigerimdanabekov aigerim2,3Saba  GhayasSaba Ghayas4*misbah  malikmisbah malik4sadia  niazisadia niazi4
  • 1School of Chinese Language and Literature, Xian University of Technology China, Xian, China
  • 2Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, Henan Province, China
  • 3School of Humanities and Arts, Xi'an International University, Xi'an, China
  • 4University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: The study evaluated the civic engagement model within a specific Pakistani cultural context. Thise study aims to examine the personal and institutional factorsfactors like institutional efficacy and student control, contributing toto civic engagement behaviors. Method: The purposive sample consisted of 307 university students aged between 18-26 years from the University of Sargodha. The reliability of all the scales used in this study was above .70. Results: The results supported the proposed model, indicating that institutional efficacy and sense of student control significantly contribute to explaining civic engagement that includes advocacy, direct action, and organizational participation. The results provide valuable insights into the relationships among attitudinal factors, civic engagement behaviors, and the influence of gender within our cultural context. The strength of the association between variables is shown by the standardized path coefficients (β). Its values ranges from -1 to 1 . Higher values of β indicate stronger impacts. Results revealed that advocacy plays a role of as mediator in the relationship between institutional efficacy and direct action. The study found a significant positive path coefficient (β) between student control and advocacy, indicating that individuals with a sense of control are more likely to engage in civic participation. Additionally, student control predicted organizational participation, leading students to actively participate in student organizations. Gender differences in the study demonstrate that males have a higher positive indirect effect of institutional efficacy on direct action through advocacy than females, and the positive direct effect of advocacy on organizational membership is more prominent for males. Conclusion: The study found that institutional efficacy and student control significantly influence advocacy, direct action, and organizational participation that define civic engagement, thus supporting the existing civic engagement model. The study extended the civic engagement model to incorporate mediation effects and investigated it in a specific cultural setting, which can be very useful for educators, lawmakers, and community organizers.

Keywords: institutional efficacy, Student control, advocacy, Direct action, Organizational participation, Civic engagement

Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 lin, aigerim, Ghayas, malik and niazi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Saba Ghayas, saba.ghayas@uos.edu.pk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.