Abstract
Background:
Adolescence is a critical period marked by increasing academic pressure and evolving self-cognition, making junior high school students particularly vulnerable to mental health challenges. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs) based on the PERMA framework have shown promise in improving well-being, but studies targeting Chinese middle school students remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized PERMA-based PPI in enhancing well-being and resilience among junior high school students in Shanghai, China.
Methods:
A total of 154 students were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (nāÆ=āÆ77) or a control group (nāÆ=āÆ77). The experimental group participated in an eight-week intervention involving weekly sessions designed to enhance the five dimensions of the PERMA framework: Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. The control group continued with regular psychology courses. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted using validated scales measuring well-being, resilience, and coping styles. Paired t-tests were used for within-group comparisons and ANCOVA for between-group comparisons, analyzed in R (v4.2.2).
Results:
At baseline, the experimental group had lower scores in positive emotion (12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.02 vs. 13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.39), relationships (12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.22 vs. 13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.05), and total well-being (47.5āÆĀ±āÆ13.6 vs. 51.1āÆĀ±āÆ14.4) compared to the control group. After the intervention, the experimental group showed significant improvements in positive emotion (+2.3), relationship (+2.2), and total well-being (+3.4). The experimental group also demonstrated significant increases in accomplishment (+1.4), engagement (+1.2), goal focus (+2.1), positive cognition (+1.5), and total resilience (+5.2). No significant changes were observed in coping styles, though slight improvements in positive coping tendency (from ā0.02 to ā0.13) and a slight decrease in negative coping tendency (from ā0.02 to ā0.01).
Conclusion:
This study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of personalized PPIs in addressing adolescentsā mental health challenges, with notable improvements in well-being and resilience. Limitations include the small sample size for paired analysis (nāÆ=āÆ58) and the timing of the intervention during the final exam period, which might have introduced biases. Future research should explore the sustained effects of such interventions and their scalability across diverse educational settings.
1 Introduction
Adolescence, identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a critical period for psychological development, is often marked by mental health challenges (World Health Organization, 2021). Global estimates indicate that 6.2% of adolescents experience depression, and 6.5% suffer from anxiety (Erskine et al., 2017). These mental health challenges profoundly impact adolescentsā well-being and academic performance, disrupting psychosocial functioning, diminishing quality of life, and contributing to poor school attendance (Finning et al., 2019).
Middle school students, in particular, are vulnerable to these mental health issues. This period is characterized by rapid physical and psychological changes, coupled with the challenges of academic demands, the complexities of peer relationships, and the quest for self-identity (Wu et al., 2022). In the context of China, the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these challenges, with reported prevalence of insomnia, depressive symptoms, and anxiety among Chinese adolescents at 37.80, 48.20, and 36.70%, respectively (Chi et al., 2021). These issues not only disrupt studentsā academic performance and daily lives but may also lead to long-term psychological issues, potentially affecting their social adjustment in adulthood (Hankin et al., 2007). Consequently, there is an urgent need for effective mental health interventions to enhance the psychological well-being of middle school students in China.
The PERMA model, developed by Seligman (2011), has gained recognition in the field of positive psychology. This model encompasses both hedonic components (such as happiness, life satisfaction, the presence of positive affect, and the absence of negative affect) and eudaimonic components (including positive psychological functioning based on indicators like meaning in life and positive relationships), and defines well-being through five dimensions: Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. In Western educational settings, studies have demonstrated that interventions based on the PERMA framework can improve adolescentsā overall well-being by fostering positive emotions, enhancing engagement in activities, strengthening relationships, and increasing a sense of purpose (Eisenreich, 2023; Jie et al., 2022). However, research applying the PERMA framework in Chinese educational contexts is sparse. Given that Chinese culture places a strong emphasis on academic achievement and social harmony, the dimensions of the PERMA frameworkāparticularly the focus on engagement, relationships, and accomplishmentāare highly relevant. However, these cultural factors, including collectivist values and the prioritization of academic success, may influence how such interventions are received and their potential effectiveness.
Previous studies have primarily focused on the effectiveness of the PERMA model in Western contexts, but less attention has been paid to how these dimensions resonate within Chinese middle school students. Additionally, while studies have explored the general benefits of positive psychology interventions (Lyubomirsky et al., 2011; Norrish et al., 2013), the application of these interventions in Chinaās academic-centric environment remains underexplored. This study aims to fill these gaps by evaluating the impact of a PERMA-based Positive Health Intervention on the psychological well-being of Chinese middle school students.
In particular, this research will focus on three key indicators: the Multidimensional Happiness Scale, the Psychological Resilience Scale, and Coping Tendency. By fostering positive emotions, enhancing engagement in school activities, improving social relationships, cultivating a sense of meaning, and strengthening academic achievement, the intervention aims to promote studentsā overall psychological well-being. This study not only contributes empirical evidence supporting the use of school-based mental health interventions in China but also provides insights into how such interventions can be adapted to fit the unique cultural and educational characteristics of the Chinese context. By addressing the specific challenges Chinese adolescents face, this research offers valuable implications for the development of policies and practices aimed at improving adolescent mental health.
2 Methods and materials
2.1 Participants
From March to June 2024, this study was conducted in a junior high school in Minhang District, Shanghai, China. Participants were selected using a random number generator to choose four seventh-grade classes for the study. Two classes were randomly assigned to the experimental group, while the remaining two served as the control group. The intervention was implemented on a class-by-class basis. Students were excluded if they were unable to attend regularly due to reasons such as sick leave, vacations, or personal leave; if they were already participating in other psychological intervention studies; if they chose to withdraw during the study; or if they had a diagnosed mental illness. Both the parents and the students were fully informed about the study, provided consent to participate, and signed informed consent forms. To ensure participant anonymity, each student was assigned a unique random number, known only to them, for the completion of all subsequent evaluations. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Minhang Mental Health Center (LW202304).
A priori power analysis was conducted using G*Power 3.1 with an effect size of 0.5, an alpha level of 0.05, and a power of 0.8, suggesting a required total sample size of 128 participants (Kang, 2021). Accounting for a potential dropout rate of 15%, the study aimed to recruit 152 participants, with 76 in each group, to ensure adequate sample size.
2.2 Pre-intervention preparation
The intervention course working team consisted of 10 members with diverse expertise: 2 psychology experts who provided guidance on the intervention programās content, 1 psychiatric nurse expert who offered support for handling special situations during the intervention activities, 4 psychological counselors/psychotherapists who facilitated the intervention activities for the experimental group, 2 psychiatric nurses (not involved in intervention activities) who distributed and collected questionnaires after undergoing standardized training, and 1 graduate nursing student and 1 of the psychiatric nurses who were responsible for organizing, verifying, and entering the questionnaire data.
Before the intervention course commenced, the psychological status of participants in the experimental group was assessed to identify their specific needs for psychological course guidance. The assessment explored their primary objectives for participation, emotional distress, interpersonal relationship challenges, academic difficulties, feelings of meaninglessness, and lack of achievement. Based on the survey results, the course content was tailored and adjusted on a class-by-class basis to better address the identified needs during the subsequent intervention sessions. For example, students who reported high academic stress were provided with engagement-focused sessions aimed at enhancing their involvement in school activities, using strategies such as goal-setting exercises and mindfulness techniques to alleviate stress and improve concentration. In addition, students experiencing interpersonal difficulties received guidance on relationship-building through structured group activities designed to foster communication, empathy, and cooperation. These adjustments were implemented to ensure that each student received relevant support tailored to their individual needs, helping to maximize the effectiveness of the intervention.
2.3 Intervention program
The intervention program was based on the five dimensions of PERMA (positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment), and assessments were designed to focus on enhancing these core aspects of well-being. The course consisted of one session per week, each lasting 45āÆmin, for a total of 8 weeks. The control group attended only the standard on-campus psychology curriculum and did not participate in any positive psychology group intervention activities based on the PERMA theory. In contrast, the experimental group received a tailored positive psychology group intervention program structured around the PERMA framework, which included sessions on Introduction, Positive Emotions, Positive Engagement, Positive Relationships, Positive Achievements, Positive Meaning, and a concluding session titled Farewell. The standard program schedule was listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Each session followed a consistent structure, comprising warm-up activities, theme-based exercises, review and summary, and assigned homework. Various teaching strategies were utilized, including group discussions, interactive games, multimedia presentations, question-and-answer segments, scenario interpretations, and case analyses.
The intervention program addressed several key themes. Participants were guided to understand their emotional characteristics and recognize the influence of emotions on behavior and life. They learned to observe othersā feelings, express their emotions appropriately, and employ techniques to maintain positive emotions while effectively releasing negative emotions. Mindfulness exercises were incorporated to enhance focus and awareness of the present moment. The program emphasized identifying sources of happiness within the learning process and developing effective communication skills to improve interactions with parents. Participants assessed their ability to form and maintain friendships and explored strategies to enhance peer relationships. Reflective exercises on significant life events helped participants identify patterns of optimism or pessimism and challenge irrational beliefs to improve self-evaluation. Additionally, the program guided participants in recognizing their personal strengths and setting realistic, stage-appropriate life goals.
This structured and multi-faceted intervention was designed to promote well-being across multiple dimensions, in alignment with the PERMA framework.
2.4 Questionnaire assessment
At baseline, a general information questionnaire was administered to collect data on class, gender, age, parental relationships, peer relationships, personality traits, life satisfaction, dietary habits, and physical activity levels. Before and after the intervention, three questionnaires were utilized to assess the psychological status of the participants and evaluate the effectiveness of the course intervention.
The Plural Well-being Questionnaire for Middle School Students was developed by a Chinese scholar to assess āfeeling goodā and āperforming wellā among middle school students based on the PERMA theory. This questionnaire comprises four dimensions: positive emotions, engagement, accomplishment, and relationships. Each dimension includes four questions, resulting in a total of 16 items. Responses are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 represents āvery inconsistent with meā and 5 represents āvery consistent with me.ā Scores range from 1 to 5 points for each question, with a total possible score of 16ā80 points. Higher scores indicate higher levels of multidimensional well-being. The questionnaire was validated in a sample of 663 junior and senior high school students from Hebei and Shandong provinces. Its internal consistency reliability, measured by Cronbachās α coefficient, was 0.909, indicating high reliability (Shang, 2014).
The Adolescent Resilience Scale, developed by Hu Yueqin and Gan Yiqun in 2008, assesses resilience across two dimensions: personal strength and support. The personal strength dimension includes three factors: goal focus, emotional control, and positive cognition; while the support dimension encompasses two factors: family support and interpersonal assistance. The scale comprises 27 items, with a total Cronbachās α coefficient of 0.83, indicating good reliability (Hu and Gan, 2008; Jiao et al., 2022).
The Simple Coping Style Scale, created by Xie Yaning in 1998, is an adaptation of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire developed by Folkman (Zeidner and Endler, 1996). It was designed to reflect the relationship between coping styles and mental health. The scale includes two subscales: positive coping tendency and negative coping tendency, with a total of 20 items. Each item is rated on a four-point scale: ānot usedā (0 points), āoccasionally usedā (1 point), āsometimes usedā (2 points), and āoften usedā (3 points). Higher scores in positive coping indicate lower levels of psychological problems and symptoms, while higher scores in negative coping suggest greater psychological difficulties. The scale has a total Cronbachās α coefficient of 0.90, demonstrating excellent reliability. The coping tendency is calculated using the formula: Coping tendencyāÆ=āÆZ (positive coping) - Z (negative coping), where Z is the standard score calculated using the mean and standard deviation of the positive and negative coping scores. If the coping tendency score is greater than 0, it indicates a preference for positive coping strategies under stress. Conversely, a score less than 0 suggests a tendency toward negative coping strategies (Xie, 1998).
2.5 Statistical analysis
After data entry by two individuals, statistical analyses were performed using R software (v4.2.2). Normally distributed continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while non-normally distributed continuous data were presented as medians with interquartile ranges. Categorical data were described using frequencies and percentages. For between-group comparisons, chi-square tests were used for unordered categorical data. Normally distributed continuous data were analyzed using two independent sample t-tests or analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with adjustments for covariates. Non-normally distributed continuous data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For paired data, a linear mixed-effects model was used, with intervention and potential covariates set as fixed effects and individual IDs treated as random effects.
In addition to analyzing changes in continuous scores of the well-being and resilience scales, we further categorized the scores to examine the proportion of students who reached different threshold levels. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare the proportions of students in the intervention and control groups who scored above specific cutoff points (e.g., ā„10, ā„11, ā„12, etc.) on each variable. This categorical comparison aimed to assess whether the PERMA-based intervention increased the proportion of students reaching higher levels of well-being or psychological resilience, suggesting potential meaningful thresholds for future intervention study (Kunkle et al., 2020; Lipsey et al., 2012). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Baseline characteristics of study population
A total of 154 students participated in the study, with two classes (nāÆ=āÆ77) assigned to the experimental group and two classes (nāÆ=āÆ77) to the control group. All students completed the full intervention course and both the pre- and post-intervention assessments. As shown in Table 1, the mean age was 13āÆyears, and gender distribution was similar between groups (48.1% male in the experimental group vs. 55.8% in the control group). Most participants lived with their parents in typical three-person households and reported being satisfied with their parental relationships. Over 90% of the participants reported having at least one close friend, maintaining a normal or healthy diet, and engaging in physical activity at least once per week.
Table 1
| Characteristics | Experimental group (NāÆ=āÆ77) | Control group (NāÆ=āÆ77) | p-valuea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.333 | ||
| Male | 37 (48.1%) | 43 (55.8%) | |
| Female | 40 (51.9%) | 34 (44.2%) | |
| Age (year) | 13.0āÆĀ±āÆ0.58 | 13.0āÆĀ±āÆ0.79 | 0.728 |
| Satisfaction with the relationship between parents | 0.372 | ||
| Very satisfied | 19 (24.7%) | 30 (39.0%) | |
| Satisfied | 28 (36.4%) | 25 (32.5%) | |
| Generally satisfied | 20 (26.0%) | 13 (16.9%) | |
| Not satisfied | 6 (7.8%) | 6 (7.8%) | |
| Very not satisfied | 4 (5.2%) | 3 (3.9%) | |
| Long-term roommates | 0.672 | ||
| Parents | 56 (72.7%) | 62 (80.5%) | |
| Mother | 13 (16.9%) | 8 (10.4%) | |
| Father | 4 (5.2%) | 4 (5.2%) | |
| Grandparents | 4 (5.2%) | 3 (3.9%) | |
| Family structure | 0.828 | ||
| Three generations | 24 (31.2%) | 29 (37.7%) | |
| Core familyb | 39 (50.6%) | 34 (44.2%) | |
| Single-parent family | 9 (11.7%) | 10 (13.0%) | |
| Divorced and reorganized family | 5 (6.5%) | 4 (5.2%) | |
| How many good friends do you think you have? | 0.081 | ||
| None | 9 (11.7%) | 3 (3.9%) | |
| 1āÆ~āÆ2 | 26 (33.8%) | 20 (26.0%) | |
| ā„3 | 42 (54.5%) | 54 (70.1%) | |
| Recent dietary status | 0.622 | ||
| No intention to eat | 6 (7.8%) | 4 (5.2%) | |
| Normal | 38 (49.4%) | 35 (45.5%) | |
| Great | 33 (42.9%) | 38 (49.4%) | |
| Frequency of physical activity | 0.603 | ||
| 0 times per week | 1 (1.3%) | 4 (5.2%) | |
| 1āÆ~āÆ2 times per week | 21 (27.3%) | 19 (24.7%) | |
| 3āÆ~āÆ4 times per week | 23 (29.9%) | 25 (32.5%) | |
| ā„5 times per week | 32 (41.6%) | 29 (37.7%) | |
Baseline characteristics of study population.
Data are presented as number (percentile) or mean ± SD.
Group difference was tested by t test for continuous variables and chi-square test or Fisher test for categorical variables.
Core family means children live with their parents.
The pre-intervention survey revealed that the primary motivations for participating in psychological counseling were to learn psychological skills (64.3%) and address personal psychological issues (62.9%). The most common challenges reported were high academic pressure or lack of motivation to study, followed by difficulties in interpersonal relationships. To address these concerns, the intervention program included two sessions focused on active engagement, designed to help students improve their concentration and discover ways to derive happiness from the learning process. Additionally, two sessions were dedicated to positive relationships, aimed at improving participantsā interactions with parents and peers.
3.2 Well-being outcomes
At baseline, the control group had significantly higher scores than the experimental group for positive emotion (13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.39 vs. 12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.02), relationship (13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.05 vs. 12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.22), and total well-being (51.1āÆĀ±āÆ14.4 vs. 47.5āÆĀ±āÆ13.6) as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. After the intervention, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups across all five variables.
Figure 1

Scores of well-being (left) and resilience (right) of the control group and experimental group pre and post intervention in the whole population (NāÆ=āÆ154. Data are presented as mean and SD. *: significant difference between groups tested by ANCOVA).
Table 2
| Variable | Timepoint | Experimental group | Control group | P-value1 | P-value2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total score of well-being | Pre | 47.5āÆĀ±āÆ13.6 | 51.1āÆĀ±āÆ14.4 | 0.110 | 0.047 |
| Post | 51.0āÆĀ±āÆ14.3 | 50.0āÆĀ±āÆ15.5 | 0.683 | 0.607 | |
| Positive emotion | Pre | 12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.02 | 13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.39 | 0.040 | 0.016 |
| Post | 13.3āÆĀ±āÆ4.19 | 13.3āÆĀ±āÆ4.64 | 0.956 | 0.947 | |
| Accomplishment | Pre | 10.9āÆĀ±āÆ3.67 | 11.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.02 | 0.381 | 0.296 |
| Post | 11.8āÆĀ±āÆ3.80 | 11.4āÆĀ±āÆ3.94 | 0.510 | 0.451 | |
| Engagement | Pre | 11.8āÆĀ±āÆ3.58 | 12.2āÆĀ±āÆ3.95 | 0.609 | 0.561 |
| Post | 12.9āÆĀ±āÆ3.83 | 12.1āÆĀ±āÆ4.32 | 0.216 | 0.134 | |
| Relationship | Pre | 12.4āÆĀ±āÆ4.22 | 13.8āÆĀ±āÆ4.05 | 0.041 | 0.015 |
| Post | 13.1āÆĀ±āÆ4.12 | 13.3āÆĀ±āÆ4.34 | 0.747 | 0.696 | |
| Total score of resilience | Pre | 83.5āÆĀ±āÆ10.3 | 84.7āÆĀ±āÆ12.5 | 0.514 | 0.508 |
| Post | 85.8āÆĀ±āÆ9.62 | 85.7āÆĀ±āÆ10.4 | 0.949 | 0.949 | |
| Goal focus | Pre | 15.1āÆĀ±āÆ3.67 | 16.1āÆĀ±āÆ3.89 | 0.127 | 0.105 |
| Post | 16.6āÆĀ±āÆ3.69 | 16.0āÆĀ±āÆ3.93 | 0.302 | 0.250 | |
| Emotional control | Pre | 19.2āÆĀ±āÆ3.75 | 19.0āÆĀ±āÆ4.30 | 0.780 | 0.772 |
| Post | 18.0āÆĀ±āÆ3.65 | 19.5āÆĀ±āÆ4.27 | 0.022 | 0.012 | |
| Positive cognition | Pre | 12.7āÆĀ±āÆ2.88 | 13.3āÆĀ±āÆ3.00 | 0.209 | 0.180 |
| Post | 13.6āÆĀ±āÆ3.33 | 13.2āÆĀ±āÆ3.25 | 0.558 | 0.543 | |
| Interpersonal assistance | Pre | 18.5āÆĀ±āÆ3.74 | 19.0āÆĀ±āÆ5.87 | 0.514 | 0.516 |
| Post | 18.9āÆĀ±āÆ3.04 | 18.9āÆĀ±āÆ3.52 | 0.999 | 0.999 | |
| Family support | Pre | 18.0āÆĀ±āÆ3.15 | 17.4āÆĀ±āÆ3.19 | 0.197 | 0.199 |
| Post | 18.6āÆĀ±āÆ3.01 | 18.0āÆĀ±āÆ2.91 | 0.184 | 0.189 |
Comparison of scores between experimental group and control group before and after the intervention.
P-value1: tested by independent sample t-test; P-value2: Adjusted for gender, age, satisfaction with the relationship between parents, long-term roommates, family structure, how many good friends you have, dietary status, and physical activity. Values in bold indicate p < 0.05.
To further explore the distribution of well-being levels, we compared the proportions of students exceeding key score thresholds. At baseline, a significantly larger proportion of students in the control group scored above thresholds such as 12, 15, and 16 on positive emotion, and 13 or 14 on accomplishment (Supplementary Table S2). However, post-intervention, these differences disappeared. Importantly, the experimental group showed a significant increase in the proportion of students whose total well-being scores exceeded 60 after the intervention (Supplementary Table S3), suggesting that the intervention helped more students reach higher levels of psychological well-being, and this might be a potential threshold for future intervention effects assessment.
3.3 Resilience outcomes
Baseline scores on the resilience scale were similar between groups, with no significant differences in total or variable scores (Figure 1; Table 2). After the intervention, the emotional control score in the control group (19.2āÆĀ±āÆ3.75) was significantly higher than that in the experimental group (18.0āÆĀ±āÆ3.65).
Threshold analysis showed that at baseline, more students in the control group had goal focus scores above 21 and family support scores above 22 (Supplementary Table S4). After the intervention, the control group continued to show higher proportions of students with emotional control above 17 or 18. Meanwhile, the experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in the proportions of students scoring above 15, 18, and 21 on goal focus, above 17 on positive cognition, and above 91 on total resilience (Supplementary Table S5), indicating gains in specific areas of resilience.
3.4 Coping tendency outcome
Coping tendency scores between the control and experimental groups showed no significant changes before and after the intervention, as shown in Supplementary Table S8. The median coping tendency score in the control group slightly changed from 0.01 [ā0.45, 0.33] pre-intervention to ā0.01 [ā0.29, 0.39] post-intervention (pāÆ=āÆ0.905), and the experimental groupās score changed from ā0.02 [ā0.32, 0.33] to ā0.13 [ā0.36, 0.35] (pāÆ=āÆ0.786). Neither the positive nor negative coping scores changed significantly in either group (all pāÆ>āÆ0.05).
3.5 Paired population analysis
In the experimental group, 58 participants had both pre- and post-intervention test results that could be matched using random numbers (paired population). Significant improvements were observed in the scores for positive emotion, accomplishment, engagement, relationship, goal focus, positive cognition, total well-being, and total resilience in this paired population after adjusting for covariates (gender, age, satisfaction with parental relationships, cohabitation status, family structure, number of close friends, dietary habits, and physical activity levels) (Table 3; Figure 2).
Table 3
| Variable | Crude model | Adjusted model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (SE) | p-value | β (SE) | p-value | |
| Total score of well-being | 3.69 (1.42) | 0.012 | 5.93 (1.53) | <0.001 |
| Positive emotion | 0.90 (0.48) | 0.067 | 1.63 (0.51) | 0.002 |
| Accomplishment | 0.93 (0.44) | 0.038 | 1.32 (0.50) | 0.011 |
| Engagement | 1.16 (0.47) | 0.016 | 1.52 (0.51) | 0.004 |
| Relationship | 0.71 (0.45) | 0.124 | 1.52 (0.45) | 0.001 |
| Total score of resilience | 3.33 (1.30) | 0.013 | 3.81 (1.39) | 0.008 |
| Goal focus | 1.83 (0.48) | <0.001 | 2.14 (0.52) | <0.001 |
| Emotional control | ā0.55 (0.44) | 0.217 | ā0.52 (0.49) | 0.290 |
| Positive cognition | 0.81 (0.46) | 0.080 | 1.08 (0.48) | 0.030 |
| Interpersonal assistance | 0.79 (0.51) | 0.127 | 0.74 (0.55) | 0.177 |
| Family support | 0.45 (0.37) | 0.235 | 0.44 (0.41) | 0.292 |
Preāpost comparison of scores within the paired experimental group (NāÆ=āÆ58) using linear mixed-effect model.
Adjusted model corrects for gender, age, satisfaction with the relationship between parents, long-term roommates, family structure, how many good friends you have, dietary status, and physical activity. Values in bold indicate p < 0.05.
Figure 2

Scores of well-being (left) and resilience (right) of the experimental group pre and post intervention in the paired population (NāÆ=āÆ58. Data are presented as mean and SD. *: significant difference before and after intervention tested by linear mixed effect model).
However, no significant changes were observed in positive or negative coping tendencies in the paired population following the intervention (Supplementary Table S6).
4 Discussion
Middle school students are in a critical stage of adolescence, characterized by increasing academic pressure and evolving self-cognition. The rising prevalence of adolescent depression, often with early-onset and recurrent patterns, is linked to long-lasting psychosocial impairments that can persist into adulthood (Wilson and Dumornay, 2022). Despite the pressing importance of addressing these issues, mental health interventions grounded in PERMA theory remain scarce among Chinese middle school students. This study implemented a personalized mental health intervention informed by a prior needs assessment of junior high school students and found significant improvements in total well-being scores and four dimensions of well-being: positive emotion, accomplishment, engagement, and relationship. Furthermore, goal focus, positive cognition, and the total resilience score also showed significant increases post-intervention. At baseline, the control group scored higher on positive emotion, relationship, and total well-being compared to the experimental group, but these differences were no longer significant after the intervention, demonstrating the interventionās effectiveness in bridging the gap between the groups.
The intervention effectively improved well-being across all measured components. Positive emotions, such as pride, joy, and contentment, are particularly relevant in collective societies where individuals strive to align with the expectations of family, friends, and peers (Lambert Dāraven and Pasha-Zaidi, 2015). Experiencing positive emotions can enhance studentsā motivation for daily studies, improve relationships with classmates and family, and contribute to an overall positive class atmosphere (Green, 2022). Engagement, which encourages independent thinking and resilience, fostered a sense of accomplishment in students. The intervention helped students set realistic goals and cope with setbacks, promoting values of belonging and interdependence (Green et al., 2019; Uchida and Ogihara, 2012).
At baseline, the experimental group had significantly lower relationship scores, suggesting challenges in parental and peer relationships, which were highlighted in the pre-course needs assessment. The intervention program addressed these issues by teaching students to think from othersā perspectives, establish and protect psychological boundaries, express their feelings, opinions, and requests positively, respond actively to othersā communication needs, and genuinely care for others to foster peer friendships. These strategies effectively improved the relationship scores in the experimental group after adjusting for potential covariates, rendering their scores comparable to those of the control group after the intervention. Accomplishment often hinges on academic success and proficiency in skills that can earn admiration from peers for junior high school students. The intervention course not only helped students identify their strengths but also guided them in setting realistic goals for different life stages. By achieving these goals, students experienced an enhanced sense of accomplishment, which motivated them to strive for personal growth and success (Metrat-Depardon and Teo, 2021).
Resilience, a key factor in adapting to adversity, was significantly enhanced in terms of goal focus, positive cognition, and total resilience after intervention. Students in the experimental group became more focused persistent under high pressure, likely due to the interventionās emphasis on goal-setting and resilience-building. However, the emotional control scores in the experimental group post-intervention were statistically lower than those in the control group. This may be attributed to the timing of the intervention, which concluded close to the final exam period. The increased academic stress during this time might have hindered studentsā ability to regulate emotions effectively, highlighting the complex relationship between cognitive focus and emotional control (Turnbull and Salas, 2021). This finding underscores the importance of designing multi-dimensional interventions that address both cognitive and emotional aspects of resilience.
Regarding coping styles, no significant changes were observed in any of the indicators after the intervention, although the experimental group showed a slight increase in positive tendency and a slight decrease in negative tendency. This may be due to the need to standardize coping style scores, which could have limited the magnitude of observable changes. Another reason might be the relatively short duration of the intervention, as coping mechanisms often require longer-term strategies or different approaches to show measurable changes. Defining coping styles for different individuals is inherently challenging, as some coping strategies incorporate predominantly positive elements, such as seeking support and actively attempting to change the situation, while others involve predominantly negative elements, such as avoidance and venting (Dijkstra and Homan, 2016). It is important to note that the labels āpositiveā and ānegativeā are relative. Positive coping methods do not always lead to favorable outcomes, nor do negative coping methods necessarily result in unfavorable consequences. For instance, strategies like āaccepting realityā and āself-comfortā are classified as negative coping methods, yet they can effectively mitigate the emotional impact of frustration (Xie, 1998). This highlights the need for further in-depth and longer period research to better understand the nuanced effects of coping styles across diverse situations and populations.
The targeted PPI, designed based on pre-course surveys, demonstrated significant intervention effects, aligning with some previous studies. For example, a Singapore study based on the PERMA model showed significant well-being improvements in students post-intervention, though not significantly exceeding the control group (Metrat-Depardon and Teo, 2021). In contrast, an American study involving 9th and 12th grade students found that an 8-week PPI had no significant effects on anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, or happiness (Eisenreich, 2023), a disparity potentially attributed to the latterās lack of needs assessment and tailored design. This study highlights how targeted PPIsāinformed by pre-assessmentācan better support adolescents (Metrat-Depardon and Teo, 2021). Moreover, effective positive education programs can indirectly improve teacher enthusiasm and student-teacher relationships (Zheng, 2021). Nevertheless, success depends critically on stakeholder involvement: implementation requires active participation from all school staff and parental support. Overburdened personnel or unsupportive parents can significantly hinder effectiveness. In addition, the positive results of this study remained significant after adjusting for potential covariates, including sociodemographic characteristics, diet, and physical activity, etc., ensuring that the effects observed in the study were not confounded.
The effectiveness of the intervention might have been influenced by cultural values prioritizing academic success and collective well-being. In Chinese culture, relationships and achievement are often seen as interconnected, and students may place more emphasis on academic and social harmony than on individual success, which could amplify or constrain the interventionās effects (Lambert Dāraven et al., 2015). This cultural context likely shaped studentsā responses to the intervention, as they may have been more motivated by the need to meet family and peer expectations than by personal psychological growth. While this study offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of a personalized PERMA-based intervention, its findings may not be fully generalizable beyond Shanghai. Socioeconomic diversity, ruralāurban differences, and variations in educational systems could influence the outcomes. For instance, students in rural areas may face different stressors and support structures compared to their urban counterparts, which could affect the interventionās impact. Further research is needed to explore these factors and test the interventionās scalability in diverse contexts.
Although this study is among the few in China to demonstrate the effectiveness of a personalized PERMA-based intervention for junior high school students, it has several limitations. First, due to the study design or studentsā potential concerns about disclosing personal information, only 58 participants in the intervention group could be matched with pre- and post-intervention questionnaire results using random numbers. Along with the limited total participants, this reduced the statistical power of the analysis. Second, the intervention concluded during the schoolās final exam period, which likely influenced studentsā mental states and their responses to the questionnaires. Finally, while the results of this pilot study are promising, the short intervention and follow-up period leaded to the need for caution in interpreting the results. Longer follow-up studies are warranted to confirm the sustained effects of personalized PPIs on studentsā long-term mental health.
5 Conclusion
This personalized mental health intervention study, grounded in the PERMA theory, demonstrated significant improvements in positive emotion, accomplishment, engagement, relationship, overall well-being, goal focus, positive cognition, and resilience following the implementation of the PPI. By guiding and coaching students in integrating PPI principles into their daily lives, the intervention effectively enhanced their motivation for learning and improved their interpersonal relationships. Future studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are needed to fully explore and confirm the long-term benefits of this intervention.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Shanghai Minhang Mental Health Center. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participantsā legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the minor(s)ā legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
LZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing ā original draft. HW: Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing ā review & editing. XC: Investigation, Writing ā review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Shanghai Minhang District Natural Science Foundation (2023MHZ005), and Psychological and Mental Health Discipline Construction Project of School of Nursing, Fudan University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisherās note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1535744/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Chi X. Liang K. Chen S. T. Huang Q. Huang L. Yu Q. et al . (2021). Mental health problems among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19: the importance of nutrition and physical activity. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.21:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.100218
2
Dijkstra M. T. Homan A. C. (2016). Engaging in rather than disengaging from stress: effective coping and perceived control. Front. Psychol.7:1415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01415
3
Eisenreich S. (2023). The effectiveness of a spiritually integrated positive psychology intervention on anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being and happiness in Orthodox Jewish adolescents. Hofstra University. Available online at:https://books.google.com/books?id=sdBP0AEACAAJ.
4
Erskine H. E. Baxter A. J. Patton G. Moffitt T. E. Patel V. Whiteford H. A. et al . (2017). The global coverage of prevalence data for mental disorders in children and adolescents. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci.26, 395ā402. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001158
5
Finning K. Ukoumunne O. C. Ford T. Danielsson-Waters E. Shaw L. Romero De Jager I. et al . (2019). The association between child and adolescent depression and poor attendance at school: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord.245, 928ā938. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.055
6
Green Z. A. (2022). Character strengths intervention for nurturing well-being among Pakistan's university students: a mixed-method study. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being14, 252ā277. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12301
7
Green Z. A. Noor U. Ahmed F. (2019). The bodyāmindāspirit dimensions of wellness mediate dispositional gratitude and life satisfaction. J. Happiness Stud.21, 3095ā3119. doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00215-6
8
Hankin B. L. Mermelstein R. Roesch L. (2007). Sex differences in adolescent depression: stress exposure and reactivity models. Child Dev.78, 279ā295. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00997.x
9
Hu Y. Gan Y. (2008). Development and psychometric validity of the resilience scale for Chinese adolescents. Acta Psychol. Sin.40, 902ā912. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00902
10
Jiao X. Y. Xu C. Z. Chen Y. Peng Q. L. Ran H. L. Che Y. S. et al . (2022). Personality traits and self-harm behaviors among Chinese children and adolescents: the mediating effect of psychological resilience. World J. Psychiatry12, 494ā504. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i3.494
11
Jie Z. Roslan S. Muhamad M. M. Md Khambari M. N. Zaremohzzabieh Z. (2022). The efficacy of positive education intervention for academic boredom and intrinsic motivation among college students: a quasi-experimental study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19:13323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013323
12
Kang H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*power software. J. Educ. Eval. Health Prof.18:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17
13
Kunkle S. Yip M. Xi W. Hunt J. (2020). Evaluation of an on-demand mental health system for depression symptoms: retrospective observational study. J. Med. Internet Res.22:e17902. doi: 10.2196/17902
14
Lambert Dāraven T. Moliver N. Thompson D. (2015). Happiness intervention decreases pain and depression, boosts happiness among primary care patients. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev.16, 114ā126. doi: 10.1017/S146342361300056X
15
Lambert Dāraven L. Pasha-Zaidi N. (2015). Using the PERMA model in the United Arab Emirates. Soc. Indic. Res.125, 905ā933. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0866-0
16
Lipsey M. W. Puzio K. Yun C. Hebert M. A. Steinka-Fry K. Cole M. W. et al . (2012). Translating the Statistical Representation of the Effects of Education Interventions Into More Readily Interpretable Forms. U. S. D. O. Education.
17
Lyubomirsky S. Dickerhoof R. Boehm J. K. Sheldon K. M. (2011). Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion11, 391ā402. doi: 10.1037/a0022575
18
Metrat-Depardon C. D. Teo C. T. (2021). Exploring the effects and benefits of a pilot school-based happiness mentoring programme with polytechnic students in Singapore. Curr. Psychol.42, 7020ā7030. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02039-1
19
Norrish J. M. Williams P. O'Connor M. Robinson J. (2013). An applied framework for positive education. Int. J. Wellbeing3, 147ā161. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v3i2.2
20
Seligman M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being: Free Press. Availableat: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-25554-000
21
Shang W. (2014). The development of middle school studentsā plural well-being Questionnaire - CNKI. [masterās thesis]. Chongqing: Southwest University.
22
Turnbull O. H. Salas C. E. (2021). The neuropsychology of emotion and emotion regulation: the role of laterality and hierarchy. Brain Sci.11:1075. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11081075
23
Uchida Y. Ogihara Y. (2012). Personal or interpersonal construal of happiness: a cultural psychological perspective. Int. J. Wellbeing2, 354ā369. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2.i4.5
24
Wilson S. Dumornay N. M. (2022). Rising rates of adolescent depression in the United States: challenges and opportunities in the 2020s. J. Adolesc. Health70, 354ā355. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.12.003
25
World Health Organization . (2021). Adolescent mental health. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
26
Wu Z. Wang B. Xiang Z. Zou Z. Liu Z. Long Y. et al . (2022). Increasing trends in mental health problems among urban Chinese adolescents: results from repeated cross-sectional data in Changsha 2016-2020. Front. Public Health10:829674. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.829674
27
Xie Y. (1998). A preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the simplified coping style scale. Chinese J. Clin. Psycol.6, 114ā115.
28
Zeidner M. Endler N. S. (1996). Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications: John Wiley &Songs. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Handbook+of+Coping%3A+Theory%2C+Research%2C+Applications-p-9780471599463
29
Zheng F. (2021). Fostering students' well-being: the mediating role of teacher interpersonal behavior and student-teacher relationships. Front. Psychol.12:796728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796728
Summary
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, PERMA, adolescent health, well-being, resilience, coping styles
Citation
Zhang L, Chen X and Wan H (2025) Effects of a personalized PERMA-based intervention on the mental health of junior high school students: a randomized clinical trial. Front. Psychol. 16:1535744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1535744
Received
27 November 2024
Accepted
12 August 2025
Published
29 August 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Antonio P. Gutierrez de Blume, Georgia Southern University, United States
Reviewed by
Haibo Xu, Xuzhou Medical University, China
Bekir Erhan Orhan, Istanbul Aydın University, Türkiye
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2025 Zhang, Chen and Wan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hengjing Wan, qdfzwhj@sina.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.