Hui Yang
Danni Xie1- 1School of Foreign Languages, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, China
- 2Lanzhou Library, Lanzhou, China
This study investigates the impact of film audio description (AD) styles on dimensions of presence—spatial presence, engagement, ecological validity, and negative effects—among visually impaired audiences in China. Two distinct styles of AD were evaluated: objective AD and subjective AD. Using a mixed-methods methodology that integrated quantitative surveys with qualitative focus group discussions, the study examined participants’ emotional and perceptual responses. The findings indicated that the subjective AD style significantly enhanced key dimensions of presence, including greater engagement, improved spatial awareness, and increased ecological validity while reducing confusion compared to the objective style. These effects were consistent across participants with varying levels of visual impairment and educational backgrounds, demonstrating the broad applicability of the subjective AD style. The study underscores the potential of subjective AD to enhance immersion and elevate the viewing experience, contributing to more inclusive and effective media accessibility for visually impaired audiences.
1 Introduction
Audio Description (AD) is a crucial accessibility tool that enables visually impaired audiences to engage with visual media. However, the style of AD can significantly influence how users perceive, interpret, and immerse themselves in audiovisual content. This study investigates two distinct AD styles—objective and subjective—and their impact on the sense of presence, a critical dimension of media immersion.
In this study, objective AD is defined as a neutral and factual approach that aims to describe only what is visually observable, avoiding interpretation or emotional coloring. This style aligns with what Kleege (2016, p. 96) terms “a form of surface reading where the emphasis is on what’s manifest.” It primarily serves a referential function, delivering information clearly and efficiently (Bartolini and Manfredi, 2022). In contrast, subjective AD is defined as an interpretive and emotionally expressive style that goes beyond surface-level description. It incorporates figurative language, evaluative commentary, and inferences about character emotions or narrative tone. This style not only describes visual elements but also conveys the describer’s subjective judgments and personal comments.
While both styles serve important communicative functions, cultural context plays a pivotal role in shaping their appropriateness and effectiveness. In Western countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, objective AD is often regarded as the professional norm, reflecting a preference for neutrality and factual accuracy. However, in Chinese AD practice, there has been a notable tendency toward subjective AD, often characterized by interpretive elaboration and evaluative language. Such stylistic tendencies highlight the importance of exploring how Chinese audiences perceive and respond to different AD styles.
Although prior research has highlighted the importance of presence in improving media accessibility, systematic comparisons of these AD styles remain limited, particularly in the context of Chinese visually impaired audiences.
This study addresses this gap by focusing on visually impaired individuals in China, a demographic often underrepresented in accessibility research. It explores how subjective AD influences key dimensions of presence, including emotional engagement, spatial awareness, and ecological validity compared to its objective counterpart. Using a mixed-methods design that combines quantitative analysis with qualitative insight and focusing on the experiences of Chinese visually impaired audiences, this study provides novel insights into enhancing media accessibility in China. It also underscores the potential of subjective AD to foster more immersive and inclusive viewing experiences.
2 Literature review
2.1 Objectivity and subjectivity in audio description
As a form of inter-semiotic translation, AD aims to “provide access for the blind and partially sighted audiences” (Bardini, 2020a, p. 274) by “translating visual images into verbal descriptions” (Braun, 2008, p. 14). When creating ADs for films, three key questions arise: “What should be described? When should the description be given? And how should the visual and aural information be described?” (Vercauteren, 2007, p. 142). To address these questions and standardize the creation of AD, many countries have developed AD guidelines (France: Morisset and Gonant, 2008; Germany: Benecke and Dosch, 2004; Greece: Georgakopoulou, 2008; USA: American Council of the Blind, 2009). Most AD guidelines advocate for an objective approach (ADC, 2009; AENOR, 2005; ITC, 2000; Morisset and Gonant, 2008; Salzhauer Axel et al., 2003; Snyder, 2010).
For many years, objectivity has been regarded as a fundamental quality standard in AD, and it remains a core principle reflected in numerous AD guidelines. The American Council of the Blind (2009) emphasize that “The best audio describers objectively recount the visual aspects of an image. Subjective or qualitative judgments or comments get in the way—they constitute an interpretation on the part of the describer and are unnecessary and unwanted.” The ITC Guideline On Standards For Audio Description (ITC, 2000) specifies “Describe what is there, do not give a personal version of what is there.” Similarly, The Ultimate Guide to Audio Description (3Play Media, n.d.) recommends “Describe what you see without interpretation or personal comment.”
The primary motivation behind the emphasis on objectivity is to respect users’ autonomy, leaving sufficient room for AD users to form their mental images of the content independently (Schaeffer-Lacroix et al., 2023, p. 2). However, this rationale is increasingly questioned, as visually impaired individuals do not have the same visual and informational access as sighted viewers. They often rely on alternative tools and methods for accessing information, with many preferring more multisensory approaches to engage with visual content (Luque Colmenero, 2024, p. 40). Furthermore, achieving complete objectivity in AD is not always feasible. Udo and Fels (2009, p. 179) argued that objective interpretation was impossible, while Hyks (2005) acknowledged that AD was inherently subjective, as individuals saw and expressed things differently. The Conseil Supérieur de L’Audiovisuel (2020) also asserted that objectivity could not be fully attained. In April 2024, Ofcom, the UK’s media regulator and a pioneer in publishing widely used accessibility guidelines updated their guidelines, and proposed “to remove the recommendation that AD should be ‘unobtrusive and impersonal’ and instead encourage providers to consider different approaches to AD (such as more traditional or creative styles), taking account of their given audience’s needs and preferences, and the genre of the programme” (Ofcom, 2024).
Emerging evidence suggests that subjective descriptions may offer significant benefits for specific segments of the visually impaired population (Kruger, 2010; Orero and Vercauteren, 2013; Palmer and Salway, 2015; Fresno et al., 2016; Geerinck and Vercauteren, 2020). Currently, “a consensus exists that a level of subjectivity is part of the AD process given that interpretation is always required and is essentially individual” (Schaeffer-Lacroix et al., 2023, p.2). The investigation of subjectivity in AD has become a focal point within reception studies. Several studies (Fryer and Freeman, 2012a; Szarkowska, 2013; Ramos Caro, 2016; Walczak and Fryer, 2017; Bardini, 2020b; Luque Colmenero and Soler Gallego, 2020; Soler Gallego and Luque Colmenero, 2022; Soler Gallego and Luque Colemero, 2023) have explored AD styles that deviate from the objective approach. Research in theatrical contexts suggested that audiences generally responded positively to subjective ADs (Udo and Fels, 2009; Udo et al., 2010). In the cinematic domain, empirical findings indicated that creative ADs could significantly enhance the sense of presence, thereby fostering a more immersive viewing experience (Walczak and Fryer, 2017). Ramos Caro (2016) examined the emotional reception of objective versus subjective ADs and concluded that descriptions incorporating emotionally charged language elicited stronger emotional responses from audiences. Fresno (2014) found that semantic AD enhanced information retention compared to traditional AD methods. Luque Colmenero (2024, p. 49) argued that “different styles of AD, including metaphorical, immersive, synesthetic, interpretive voices, and poetic styles, have the potential to enhance the subjective and aesthetic experience of museum visitors.”
The study of AD reception in China remains in its early stages, with limited literature available on the topic. Xiao and Dong (2020) conducted an experiment and survey with visually impaired individuals in Shanghai, comparing artificial-voice AD to human-voice AD, and found a preference for human voices. Shen and Lei (2021) explored AD interpreting techniques through the practical operation of the Hangzhou barrier-free film project. Zhang et al. (2000) utilized case studies, questionnaires, and interviews to examine how AD movies help visually impaired audiences have an equal viewing experience to those without visual impairments. Wang and Wang (2020) discussed issues such as the transformation between video rhetoric and text, as well as the preservation of the original film’s form and style. Yang et al. (2023) which focused on the reception of existing AD services in mainland China, revealed that “over interpretation, revealing the plot, subjective speculations are common practices in AD services in the Chinese mainland but are applauded by the participants for which helps them to understand the film.” Additionally, recent international efforts have provided a broader overview of AD in China. Tor-Carroggio and Casas-Tost (2020) outlined the profile of Chinese audio describers, while Tor-Carroggio and Rovira-Esteva (2019) investigated the satisfaction and experiences of Chinese AD users.
2.2 Audio description and presence
Presence is a multi-construct concept that extends the notion of “telepresence,” originally developed to describe human interaction with remote access technologies (Minsky, 1980). It can be defined as the “perceptual illusion of non-mediation” (Lombard and Ditton, 1997), the “illusion of being there” (Biocca, 1997, p. 18), or “the illusion of being located somewhere other than the physical environment” (Walczak and Fryer, 2018, p. 69). As a cognitive construct, presence influences how users feel and act as if the events they experience in virtual reality are happening in the real world (Cummings and Bailenson, 2015). This concept encompasses the psychological sense of immersion in any mediated environment (Fryer and Freeman, 2012b, p. 15).
As an access service, AD is crucial in enhancing audience engagement with audiovisual content. AD not only serves as a valuable resource to help users understand the material but also enables viewers to immerse themselves in the story, fully enjoying the cinematic experience. After all, the pursuit of entertainment is a key reason audiences are drawn to cinema (Davis et al., 2015). Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive effects of AD on media comprehension and the increased accessibility of visual content for visually impaired viewers (Schmeidler and Kirchner, 2001; Palomo, 2008; Chmiel and Mazur, 2012; Romero-Fresco and Fryer, 2013). However, only a few reception studies have explored the impact of AD on users’ emotional responses and their sense of presence.
Fryer and Freeman (2012a) investigated the impact of AD on the sense of presence in media, and found that participants with impaired sight reported higher levels of presence when watching stimuli with AD, compared to sighted people watching the same stimuli without AD. A comparison between standard AD and cinematic AD revealed that engagement scores were highest for the cinematic AD version among blind and partially sighted participants. In Bardini’s study (2020b), 45 blind and partially sighted Catalan viewers engaged with three different AD styles. The results indicated that both cinematic and narrative AD styles significantly enhanced the film experience, leading to greater satisfaction compared to conventional AD. Ramos Caro (2016) examined the emotional reception of AD by comparing objective and subjective descriptions, focusing on emotions such as fear, sadness, and disgust. The study found that subjective AD was more effective in conveying fear and sadness, and was positively received by users. Walczak and Fryer (2017) investigated the impact of creative AD on the sense of presence, and found that creative AD led to higher presence scores, with the majority of participants expressing a preference for it. Bardini (2017) tested three different AD styles—denotative, cinematic, and narrative—among visually impaired participants in Catalonia. The findings suggested that comprehension, enjoyment, and emotion were closely linked in the film experience and could be influenced by the style of AD employed. Hättich and Schweizer (2020) confirmed that AD, provided by an application, was a useful tool for people with sight loss, allowing them to immerse themselves and enjoy films as much as sighted people. Walczak’s (2017) study showed that creative AD led to higher levels of presence compared to standard AD. Additionally, AD narrated by a human voice generated significantly greater levels of presence for fiction than AD delivered by a synthetic voice.
3 An empirical study on the impact of film audio description style on the presence
This research builds on prior work but centers on Chinese blind and visually impaired audiences. It narrows the focus to the style of AD scripts—subjective versus objective. To minimize the potential influence of vocal delivery styles on the sense of presence, the study utilized identical artificially synthesized voices for the clips. The primary objective is to investigate how different AD styles affect users’ sense of presence and to evaluate user experiences associated with these styles. Ultimately, the study aims to determine whether subjective or objective AD leads to a greater sense of presence among Chinese visually impaired audiences.
3.1 Aim and hypothesis
The primary aim of this study is to assess whether there are differences in the presence elicited by two distinct AD versions of the same scenes: one that is more objective and another that is more subjective. The main hypothesis is that the subjective version will evoke a stronger sense of presence in Chinese visually impaired audiences, compared to the objective version.
3.2 Materials and stimuli
To examine the impact of subjective and objective AD styles on the sense of presence in Chinese visually impaired audiences, two romantic clips from The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008), a romantic fantasy drama directed by David Fincher, were selected. The film was introduced in China in 2009 and was dubbed into Mandarin. An audio-described version of the film is available in both China and the United Kingdom.
The first clip, lasting 12 min, is set in Murmansk in 1941. It depicts Benjamin’s infatuation with Elizabeth Abbott, the wife of the British trade mission’s chief minister. Their brief affair ultimately ends, leaving Benjamin heartbroken.
The second clip, 13 min in length, takes place in 1962. It portrays Daisy’s return to New Orleans and her reunion with Benjamin. Now at a similar physical age, they fall in love and decide to live together.
Two distinct AD scripts—one subjective and one objective—were employed in this study. As highlighted in the literature, British AD practices generally emphasize objective descriptions, whereas AD in China tends to adopt a more subjective approach. Accordingly, the subjective AD script was sourced from China, while the objective AD script was sourced from the UK. The latter was carefully translated into Chinese by the authors, ensuring both stylistic and content equivalence with the original script. Both scripts were used in their original forms without modification.
The two selected clips from the original Mandarin-dubbed movie were supplemented with objective and subjective AD scripts. Professionals from Gansu TV Station then produced them as test clips. To maintain consistency and minimize potential biases related to vocal delivery, both scripts were narrated using the same synthetic female voice. Table 1 presents excerpts from both versions for comparison, with the Chinese script translated into English for this article.
Table 1. Extracts from the AD scripts for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.
3.3 A comparison of objective and subjective descriptions of the clips
Objective and subjective descriptions differ significantly in focus, language, perspective, and interpretation, as summarized in Table 2. Objective descriptions emphasize observable details and events, maintaining a neutral tone that allows the audience to interpret scenes independently. For example, in Clip 1, an objective description states, “Benjamin takes a seat by the fire. As the night wears on, Benjamin drifts off to sleep. When he wakes, people are milling around the lobby.” This straightforward, factual approach presents clear visual details without suggesting emotional interpretations, leaving room for the audience’s own understanding.
Table 2. The differences between objective descriptions and subjective descriptions.
In contrast, subjective descriptions focus on emotional and atmospheric elements, offering interpretive insights into characters’ thoughts, motivations, or overall mood. For instance, in the same clip, a subjective description reads, “Benjamin sat down by the fire, waiting for his sweetheart to arrive. Until he fell asleep on the couch, Elizabeth still had not appeared.” This description conveys a sense of anticipation and longing, encouraging the audience to empathize with Benjamin’s emotional state.
The language and style further differentiate the two approaches. Objective descriptions rely on factual, direct, and neutral language, presenting events sequentially and focusing on concrete imagery. For instance, in Clip 2, an objective description states, “Benjamin and Daisy are silhouetted against the lilac sunset on the slowly drifting boat.” By contrast, subjective descriptions use rich, evocative language to enhance the emotional depth of a scene. The same scene was described subjectively as, “They loved each other with boundless passion, losing all sense of time as day and night blurred in their fervent embrace.” This romanticized version employs figurative devices such as metaphor and personification to immerse the audience in the characters’ experiences.
These two styles serve distinct storytelling purposes. Objective descriptions provide narrative neutrality, making them ideal for delivering information or setting the scene without bias. Subjective descriptions, on the other hand, engage the audience’s imagination and emotions, creating a more vivid and immersive storytelling experience.
3.4 Participants
Fifty participants (17 men and 33 women), aged 19 to 70 years (M = 35.5, SD = 14.12), were recruited from Lanzhou, Gansu Province, through the Gansu Association of the Visually Impaired, the Gansu Provincial Library, and personal networks. All participants were officially registered as visually impaired and reported their age of vision loss onset, which ranged from 2 to 51 years, with a mean of 14.36 years (SD = 11.19). Among them, 48% cited congenital causes of visual impairment, such as retinitis pigmentosa, cataracts, or glaucoma, while 52% reported acquired causes, including retinal detachment and progressive disorders. Educational attainment varied: 2% were illiterate, 6% had completed primary school, 36% middle school, 38% high school, and 18% college or higher. The severity of visual impairment ranged from extremely severe (28%) and severe (30%) to moderate (28%) and mild (14%). Ethical approval for the study was given by the first author’s institution.
3.5 Instruments
The Elicited Emotion Scale (Gross and Levenson, 1995) was used to assess the participants’ emotional experiences. Participants rated the intensity of their emotions experienced during the clip on a scale from 1 to 5, where 0 indicated “not feeling even the slightest bit of emotion” and 5 represented “the most you have ever felt in your life.” From the original 16 items, two relevant to this study were selected: Interest and Confusion.
The subjective feeling component was assessed using a validated self-report questionnaire commonly employed to measure emotional experiences. Participants’ immersion in the presented material was assessed through the ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory (Lessiter et al., 2001), which utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) to measure four dimensions of presence: sense of physical space, engagement, ecological validity, and negative effects. To mitigate participant fatigue, the short form of the inventory was administered, as has been utilized in several previous studies (Fryer and Freeman, 2014; Hammick and Lee, 2014; Walczak and Fryer, 2017).
For the positive subscales, three items were selected from each dimension: for a sense of physical space (“I felt I was visiting the places in the scenes,” “During the clip I had a sense of being in the scenes,” “I felt surrounded by the scenes”); for engagement (“I felt myself being drawn in,” “I lost track of time,” “I paid more attention to the scenes than to my own thoughts”); and for ecological validity (“the scenes seemed natural,” “the content seemed believable to me,” “I felt the environments were part of the real world”). A single item assessed negative effects: “I experienced sensations such as dizziness, disorientation, nausea, a headache, or tiredness.” For this study, the item “eye strain” was excluded from the negative sensations list.
3.6 Procedure
We adopted a dual approach that incorporates both questionnaires and interviews. This methodology allows us to complement quantitative data with qualitative insights.
The individual questionnaires primarily consisted of a Likert scale and short questions, while interviews were conducted in a group format. Participants were organized into focus groups of 5 individuals, each engaged in an experimental session lasting about 1 h. Each participant had a volunteer to assist in completing the questionnaire and interview. Before the session, the aims of the study were explained and informed consent forms were signed.
At the beginning of the session, each participant was provided with a small bottle of water and some cakes, fostering an informal atmosphere. We began with sociodemographic questions to facilitate introductions among participants. Following this, participants watched both clips, each presented in a different AD style on a laptop without headphones. The order of the clips and the AD styles were counterbalanced throughout the sample. To help viewers better understand the movie clips and follow the plot, each movie clip is preceded by a short audio introduction to the plot before the clip. Participants listened to one of the AD versions and subsequently completed the questionnaire. To mitigate potential contamination effects that could skew the results, participants answered the questionnaire items individually, using a specially designed one-rod abacus with five beads.
Discussion occurred after each section of the questionnaire. Participants were asked to share their experiences and preferences regarding the descriptions and were encouraged to provide additional comments.
4 Results and discussion
4.1 The impact of AD styles on presence
To examine the influence of subjective versus objective audio description styles on presence among visually impaired audiences, we conducted paired t-tests (Tables 3, 4) and effect size calculations (Table 5) using SPSS. The results show significant differences between the two styles, suggesting that subjective audio descriptions are more effective in enhancing key dimensions of user experience, including interest, clarity, spatial awareness, engagement, and ecological validity. These dimensions are critical in fostering a sense of presence among visually impaired audiences, enabling a more immersive and satisfying film experience.
Table 3. Paired sample statistics for AD styles and presence.
Table 4. Results of paired sample t-test for AD styles and presence.
Table 5. Results of effect size for paired samples for AD styles and presence.
4.1.1 Interest
The subjective style yielded a higher mean score of 4.34 compared to 3.96 for the objective style, with a significant t-value (t(49) = 2.220, p = 0.031). The large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.210, Hedges’ g = 1.229) confirms that subjective descriptions are perceived as more engaging by viewers. This suggests that the subjective style may help hold the audience’s attention by incorporating interpretive elements.
4.1.2 Confusion
Confusion scores were significantly lower for the subjective style (M = 1.44) than for the objective style (M = 2.20), with t(49) = −3.569 and p < 0.001, indicating greater clarity in subjective descriptions. The large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.506, Hedges’ g = 1.529) supports the idea that subjective descriptions reduce ambiguity and cognitive load, potentially due to additional contextual cues and interpretive language, such as expressions of subjective judgments and comments.
4.1.3 Sense of physical space
Participants reported a stronger sense of physical space with the subjective style (M = 3.99) compared to the objective style (M = 3.17), showing a significant difference (t(49) = 3.780, p < 0.001). The large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.546, Hedges’ g = 1.571) suggests that the subjective approach more effectively conveys spatial dimensions, likely enhancing the immersive experience for visually impaired viewers.
4.1.4 Engagement
The subjective style also significantly outperformed the objective style in terms of engagement, with mean scores of 3.97 and 3.38, respectively (t(49) = 2.926, p = 0.005). The large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.434, Hedges’ g = 1.456) suggests that subjective descriptions foster a deeper emotional and cognitive connection with the content.
4.1.5 Ecological validity
The subjective style was perceived as more realistic, scoring higher in ecological validity (M = 4.06) than the objective style (M = 3.21), with a significant t-value (t(49) = 4.055, p < 0.001). The large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.488, Hedges’ g = 1.511) further supports the notion that subjective descriptions offer a more authentic and believable experience for viewers, contributing to the overall immersion.
4.1.6 Negative effects
While negative effect scores were low for both styles, the objective style scored slightly higher (M = 1.22) than the subjective style (M = 1.08). The t-test did not yield a significant difference (t(49) = −1.095, p = 0.279), and the effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.904, Hedges’ g = 0.918) was relatively small. This finding suggests that neither style is associated with substantial adverse effects, though the subjective style may be marginally less likely to induce negative responses.
The large effect sizes observed in this study highlight the substantial practical significance of AD style. These results suggest that AD style extends beyond mere statistical differences, profoundly influencing the media experience for visually impaired audiences.
In practical terms, adopting a more subjective approach to AD can significantly enhance emotional engagement, fostering a deeper connection with the content. Through interpretive cues and richer contextual information, subjective AD not only reduces cognitive load and enhances clarity but also amplifies spatial and ecological presence, creating a more immersive and enjoyable viewing experience. This, in turn, can lead to higher viewer retention, increased satisfaction, and greater active engagement with audiovisual media.
These improvements also have critical implications for media accessibility. Subjective AD can contribute to a more inclusive media environment, enabling visually impaired viewers to navigate and enjoy content more independently. Furthermore, these advancements could promote more positive attitudes toward inclusive cultural participation and broader accessibility initiatives. As AD services continue to develop, especially in regions like China, these findings underscore the importance of not only prioritizing informational accuracy but also tailoring AD to align with audience preferences and enhance presence.
In addition to the quantitative analysis, qualitative data from focus group discussions further illuminated participants’ perceptions of the two AD styles. Participants were asked to share their experiences and preferences regarding subjective and objective descriptions and were encouraged to provide any additional comments.
Many participants expressed a preference for the subjective style, noting that it felt more emotionally engaging. One participant remarked, “With the subjective descriptions, I could truly sense the characters’ emotions, which made me feel more connected to the story as if I were living it alongside them.” Another shared, “The objective description was clear, but I did not feel as engaged with the scene.”
While subjective descriptions were seen as more immersive, several participants noted that they could sometimes be confusing if they were too rich in detail or overly emotional. One participant explained, “The subjective descriptions sometimes added too much emotion, which made it harder to understand what was actually happening.” However, others found the subjective style clearer, with one participant commenting, “The additional context provided in the subjective style, particularly the interpretation and subjective judgments and comments, helped me better understand the characters and follow the story more easily.”
When discussing spatial awareness, participants were split. Some felt that the subjective style provided a clearer sense of space, especially in scenes with strong emotional or atmospheric elements. One participant noted, “In scenes where Benjamin and Daisy were together, I could picture the setting much better. It felt like I was in the scene with them.” However, a few participants felt that excessive emotional detail in the subjective descriptions occasionally detracted from their understanding of spatial details. One participant noted, “I liked the subjective descriptions, but sometimes I missed knowing exactly where they were or what they were doing physically.”
The subjective style was widely praised for offering a more realistic and relatable experience. Many participants commented on how the descriptions made the film feel more authentic, with one saying, “The subjective descriptions felt real like I was experiencing the emotions and atmosphere of the scene myself.” However, a few participants expressed that the heightened emotional language could sometimes overshadow the realism of the setting. One participant mentioned, “It was realistic, but at times it felt a bit too dramatic, which made me lose touch with the actual environment.”
Both quantitative analysis and qualitative data from focus group discussions indicate that subjective audio description styles have a notable advantage in creating an engaging and immersive experience for visually impaired audiences. By enhancing clarity, spatial awareness, and ecological validity, subjective descriptions support a stronger sense of presence. Given the consistently large effect sizes, particularly in interest and spatial perception, the findings suggest that subjective descriptions are especially beneficial in contexts requiring emotional engagement and clear spatial understanding. Future studies could examine whether these benefits hold across different genres and settings, potentially extending the applicability of subjective audio descriptions in media accessibility initiatives.
4.2 Exploratory analyses on the moderating effects of age and onset of visual impairment
To explore whether individual demographic factors moderate the effects of AD style (subjective vs. objective) on presence, two repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted, examining age and onset of visual impairment (congenital vs. acquired) as potential moderators.
First, the analysis examining age revealed no significant interaction effects across any of the six dimensions. Specifically, for interest, the AD style × age interaction was non-significant, F(1,48) = 0.538, p = 0.927, indicating that the influence of AD style on interest was consistent across age groups. Similar null interactions were observed for confusion (F = 0.498, p = 0.957), negative effects (F = 0.816, p = 0.696), sense of physical space (F = 0.657, p = 0.851), ecological validity (F = 1.202, p = 0.333), and engagement (F = 0.695, p = 0.816). Additionally, age showed no significant main effects on any dimension (all ps > 0.05). These results suggest that age does not moderate the relationship between AD style and audience presence.
In contrast, the analysis examining onset of visual impairment revealed significant interaction effects for sense of physical space and engagement. For sense of physical space, a significant interaction emerged, F(1,48) = 5.413, p = 0.024. Ratings for the subjective AD were similar between groups (congenital: M = 3.93, SD = 0.96; acquired: M = 4.05, SD = 1.11); however, scores for the objective AD were notably lower in the acquired group (M = 2.76, SD = 1.21) than in the congenital group (M = 3.61, SD = 0.98). This suggests that individuals with acquired vision loss may benefit more from the spatial elaboration afforded by subjective AD.
Similarly, for engagement, a significant interaction was observed, F(1,48) = 7.778, p = 0.008. Both groups responded positively to the subjective AD (congenital: M = 3.82, SD = 0.91; acquired: M = 4.12, SD = 0.89), but engagement dropped considerably under the objective AD in the acquired group (M = 3.01, SD = 1.28), compared to the congenital group (M = 3.78, SD = 0.84). This indicates a stronger reliance on subjective cues for emotional engagement among individuals with acquired vision loss.
No significant interaction effects or main effects were found for the remaining dimensions—interest, confusion, ecological validity, and negative effects—implying that AD style influenced these aspects similarly across onset groups. These findings underscore the importance of considering the onset of visual impairment in designing AD content. The enhanced effectiveness of subjective AD in fostering spatial and emotional presence among individuals with acquired vision loss may reflect differences in perceptual habits or previous audiovisual experiences. Future studies are warranted to further investigate these mechanisms and refine AD practices for diverse user populations.
4.3 The relationship between AD style preference and gender
SPSS analysis revealed a clear preference for the subjective AD, with 80% of participants favoring it over the objective AD, which was preferred by only 20%. Contrary to the findings of Walczak and Fryer (2017), a Chi-square test (Table 6) in our study indicated no statistically significant relationship between gender and preferences for audio description styles. The Pearson Chi-square yielded a p-value of 0.654, greater than the conventional significance threshold of 0.05, indicating no significant association between gender and AD style preference. Fisher’s Exact Test corroborated this result, showing a two-tailed exact significance of 0.717 and a one-tailed exact significance of 0.461, further confirming that there is no significant association between gender and AD style preferences in this sample.
Table 6. Chi-Square test results for the relationship between AD style preference and gender.
4.4 The impact of the degree of sight loss on the presence
A one-way ANOVA was conducted in SPSS to examine differences in various aspects of presence—sense of physical space, engagement, and ecological validity—across groups with varying levels of sight ability under both subjective and objective AD styles.
The results, summarized in Table 7, showed no statistically significant differences between groups (all p-values > 0.05). This finding contrasts with the results of Walczak and Fryer (2017), as no aspect of presence (sense of physical space, engagement, or ecological validity) showed significant variation by sight ability in this sample, regardless of AD style. This suggests that, within this sample, sight ability does not significantly impact presence under either subjective or objective audio description conditions.
Table 7. One-way ANOVA results for the relationship between degree of sight loss and presence.
However, differences in sample sizes across groups limit the reliability and interpretability of these results. Small group sizes, particularly in the “moderate” (N = 9) and “mild” (N = 6) groups, resulted in wide confidence intervals, high standard errors, and potential distortions in random-effects estimates. These factors reduce the statistical power of the analysis, potentially contributing to the lack of significant findings. The “extremely severe” group, with N = 22, was the largest, while the “severe” group had N = 13, illustrating the variability in sample sizes among groups. To improve reliability in future research, increasing sample sizes for underrepresented groups may be beneficial. Additionally, exploring potential interaction effects or other factors that could influence presence perceptions among visually impaired audiences could provide further insight.
4.5 The impact of the degree of education on the presence
A one-way ANOVA was conducted in SPSS focusing on the effects of education on different aspects of presence (sense of physical space, engagement, and ecological validity) for both subjective and objective AD styles. The results (Table 8) show educational level does not seem to produce statistically significant differences in the sense of presence, whether measured by sense of physical space, engagement, or ecological validity, across subjective and objective AD styles.
Table 8. One-way ANOVA results for the relationship between education and presence.
To explore whether educational background influenced participants’ preferences for AD style (subjective vs. objective), a chi-square test of independence was conducted. The results revealed no significant association between education level and AD style preference, χ2(4) = 3.656, p = 0.455. Of the 50 participants, 40 preferred the subjective AD, and 10 preferred the objective AD, with no discernible trend across educational groups.
However, the chi-square test assumptions were violated, as 70% of the cells had expected counts below 5—particularly among participants with lower education levels. To account for this, a Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test was employed, yielding similarly non-significant results (p = 0.362), corroborated by a Monte Carlo simulation (99% CI: [0.349, 0.374]).
These findings suggest that within the current sample, education background did not significantly influence AD style preference. Nevertheless, the imbalanced distribution of education levels limits the generalizability of the results. Future research with more stratified samples may illuminate whether and how educational background interacts with cognitive processing or emotional engagement in response to different AD styles, potentially enriching our understanding of user diversity in AD reception.
4.6 Practical implications for AD production and policy in China
The findings of this study provide meaningful insights for the development of AD production practices and policy-making in China, where standardized national AD guidelines have yet to be established. The clear preference for subjective AD—particularly among individuals with acquired vision loss—suggests that greater flexibility in AD scriptwriting should be encouraged, allowing for more interpretive and emotionally expressive content. This contrasts with the objective style traditionally emphasized in many international AD standards.
For AD producers and scriptwriters, these results highlight the importance of integrating culturally resonant and emotionally engaging narrative elements into AD scripts. Rather than strictly adhering to a factual delivery, AD in the Chinese context may benefit from incorporating subjective descriptions that reflect character emotions and interpersonal dynamics, thereby enhancing audience presence and engagement. Furthermore, incorporating feedback from visually impaired users into the AD creation process could help tailor content to actual audience needs and preferences.
At the policy level, efforts to establish national AD guidelines in China could consider adopting a balanced approach—recognizing the value of both objective and subjective styles depending on the context and audience profile. Such a framework would allow for stylistic diversity while maintaining accessibility and consistency. Policies that support audience-centered AD production, including funding mechanisms and regulatory incentives, could further promote high-quality, user-responsive content.
Additionally, the genre of the film may influence how viewers respond to different AD styles. This study used a romantic drama, where emotional resonance was central to the viewing experience. Subjective AD likely enhanced this emotional engagement by conveying internal states and relational nuances. However, whether the same effects would be observed in action films, comedies, documentaries, or other genres—where narrative pacing and tonal expectations differ—remains an open question. Future research should explore genre-specific AD strategies to ensure that the descriptive style aligns with both genre conventions and audience expectations.
5 Conclusion
This study highlights the significant advantages of adopting subjective audio description styles in enhancing the sense of presence among Chinese visually impaired audiences. By incorporating interpretive and emotional elements, subjective ADs demonstrated improvements in key dimensions of presence, including spatial awareness, engagement, ecological validity, and overall clarity, compared to objective AD styles. These findings underscore the potential of subjective ADs to foster deeper emotional and cognitive connections with audiovisual content, leading to a more immersive and enriching viewing experience.
Importantly, the study found that demographic factors such as degree of sight loss, gender, and education level did not significantly moderate the effects of AD style on presence, suggesting the broad applicability of subjective ADs across diverse groups within the Chinese visually impaired population. This universality underscores the relevance of subjective AD as a promising approach for enhancing media accessibility and inclusivity.
Future research should build on these findings by exploring the effectiveness of subjective ADs across different film genres, cultural contexts, and larger demographic samples. Furthermore, longitudinal studies could investigate the sustained impact of subjective ADs on user preferences and media engagement over time. By addressing these questions, researchers and practitioners can refine audio description practices to better meet the needs of Chinese visually impaired audiences, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive media landscape.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Lanzhou Jiaotong University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
HY: Writing – review & editing. DX: Writing – review & editing. YL: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Program (Key Research and Development - Social Development Sector), grant number 24YFFA024.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
3Play Media. (n.d.). The ultimate guide to audio description. Available online at: https://www.3playmedia.com/learn/popular-topics/audio-description (Accessed October 20, 2024).
ADC. (2009). Standards for audio description and code of professional conduct for describers. Available online at: https://audiodescriptionsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/adc_standards_090615.pdf (Accessed September 18, 2024).
AENOR. (2005). Norma UNE: 153020. Audiodescripción para personas con discapacidad visual. Requisitos para la audiodescripción y elaboración de audioguías. Available online at: https://tienda.aenor.com/normas/buscador-de-normas?k=g:UNE&c=N0032787 (Accessed September 18, 2024).
American Council of the Blind. (2009). Audio description standards. Available online at: https://adp.acb.org/docs/ADP_Standards.pdf (Accessed September 20, 2024).
Bardini, F. (2017). Audio description style and the film experience of blind spectators: Design of a Reception Study. Int. J. Trans. 19, 49–73. doi: 10.13137/2421-6763/17351
Bardini, F. (2020a). Audio description and the translation of film language into words. Ilha Desterro J. Engl. Lang. Literat. Engl. Cult. Stud. 73, 273–296. doi: 10.5007/2175-8026.2020v73n1p273
Bardini, F. (2020b). Film language, film emotions and the experience of blind and partially sighted viewers: a reception study. J. Special. Transl. 33, 259–280.
Bartolini, C., and Manfredi, M. (2022). Combining Intersemiotic and Interlingual translation in training Programmes: a functional approach to museum audio description. Status Quaest. 23, 75–98. doi: 10.13133/2239-1983/18225
Biocca, F. (1997). The Cyborg’s dilemma: embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 3, 12–26.
Braun, S. (2008). Audio description research: state of the art and beyond. Trans. Stud. New Millennium 6, 14–30.
Chmiel, A., and Mazur, I. (2012). “AD reception research: some methodological considerations” in Emerging topics in translation: Audio description. ed. E. Perego (Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste), 57–80.
Conseil Supérieur de L’Audiovisuel. (2020). Guide de l’audiodescription – Principes essentiels, outil d’évaluation et bonnes pratiques professionnelles. Available online at: https://enaparte-audiodescription.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Guide-audiodescription.pdf (Accessed September 20, 2024).
Cummings, J. J., and Bailenson, J. N. (2015). How immersive is enough? A Meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol. 19, 272–309. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
Davis, G., Dickinson, K., Patti, L., and Villarejo, A. (2015). Film studies: A global introduction. London: Routledge.
Fresno, N. (2014). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The role of memory in audio description. Across Lang. Cult. 15, 111–129. doi: 10.1556/Acr.15.2014.1.6
Fresno, N., Castellà, J., and Soler-Vilageliu, O. (2016). “What should I say? Tentative criteria to prioritize information in the audio description of film characters” in Researching audio description. New approaches. eds. A. Matamala and P. Orero (London: Palgrave Macmillan London), 143–167.
Fryer, L., and Freeman, J. (2012a). Cinematic language and the description of film: keeping AD users in the frame. Perspectives 21, 412–426. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2012.693108
Fryer, L., and Freeman, J. (2012b). Presence in those with and without sight: implications for virtual reality and audio description. J. Cyberther. Rehabil. 5, 15–23.
Fryer, L., and Freeman, J. (2014). “Can you feel what I’m saying? The impact of verbal information on emotion elicitation and presence in people with a visual impairment” in Challenging presence: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on presence. eds. A. Felnhofer and O. D. Kothgassner (Wien: Facultas), 99–107.
Geerinck, B., and Vercauteren, G. (2020). Audio describing the mental dimension of narrative characters. Insights from a Flemish case study. Punctum 6, 85–107. doi: 10.18680/hss.2020.0005
Georgakopoulou, P. (2008). “Audio description guidelines for Greek - a working document” in A comparative study of audio description guidelines prevalent in different countries. eds. S. Rai, J. Greening, and P. Leen (London: RNIB), 105–108.
Gross, J. J., and Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognit. Emot. 9, 87–108. doi: 10.1080/02699939508408966
Hammick, J., and Lee, M. (2014). Do shy people feel less communication apprehension online? The effects of virtual reality on the relationship between personality characteristics and communication outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 302–310. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.046
Hättich, A., and Schweizer, M. (2020). I hear what you see: effects of audio description used in a cinema on immersion and enjoyment in blind and visually impaired people. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 38, 284–298. doi: 10.1177/0264619620911429
Hyks, V. (2005). Audio description and translation. Two related but different skills. Transl. Today 4, 6–8.
ITC (2000). ITC Guidance on Standards for Audio Description. Available online at: https://docslib.org/doc/6597778/itc-guidance-on-standards-for-audio-description (Accessed September 25, 2024).
Kleege, G. (2016). Audio description described: current standards, future innovations, larger implications. Representations 135, 89–101. doi: 10.1525/rep.2016.135.1.89
Kruger, J. L. (2010). Audio-narration: re-narrativising film. Perspectives 18, 231–249. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2010.485686
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., and Davidoff, J. (2001). A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleop. Virt. 10, 282–297. doi: 10.1162/105474601300343612
Lombard, M., and Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 3:72. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Luque Colmenero, M. O. (2024). “Subjectivity and creativity versus audio description guidelines” in Transforming media accessibility in Europe. eds. A. Marcus-Quinn, K. Krejtz, and C. Duarte (Cham: Springer), 39–52.
Luque Colmenero, M. O., and Soler Gallego, S. (2020). Metaphor as creativity in audio descriptive Tours for art Museums: from description to practice. J. Audiovis. Transl. 3, 64–78. doi: 10.47476/jat.v3i2.2020.128
Morisset, L., and Gonant, F. (2008). L’audiodescription: Principes et orientations. Available online at: https://www.csa.fr/Media/Files/Espace-Juridique/Chartes/Charte-de-l-audiodescription (Accessed September 25, 2024).
Ofcom (2024). Statement on changes to the TV access services code and updates to Ofcom’s best practice guidelines on access services. Available online at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/accessibility/ensuring-quality-of-tv-and-on-demand-access-services (Accessed October 20, 2024).
Orero, P., and Vercauteren, G. (2013). Describing facial expressions: much more than meets the eye. Quaderns. Rev. Traducció 20, 187–199.
Palmer, A., and Salway, A. (2015). Audio description on the thought-action continuum. Style 49, 126–148. doi: 10.5325/style.49.2.0126
Palomo, A. (2008). “Audio description as language development and language learning for blind and visual impaired children” in Thinking translation: Perspectives from within and without. eds. R. H. Parker and K. G. Garcıa (California: Brown Walker Press), 113–134.
Ramos Caro, M. (2016). Testing audio narration: the emotional impact of language in audio description. Perspect. Stud. Transl. Theory Pract. 24, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760
Romero-Fresco, P., and Fryer, L. (2013). Could audio described films benefit from audio introductions? A reception study with AD users. J. Vis. Impair. Blindn. 107, 287–295. doi: 10.1177/0145482X1310700405
Salzhauer Axel, E., Hooper, V., Kardoulias, T., Stephenson Keyes, S., and Rosenberg, F. (2003). “AEB’s guidelines for verbal description” in Art beyond sight: A resource guide to art, creativity, and visual impairment. eds. E. Salzhauer Axel and N. Sobol Levent (New York: AFB Press), 229–237.
Schaeffer-Lacroix, E., Reviers, N., and Di Giovanni, E. (2023). Beyond objectivity in audio description: new practices and perspectives. J. Audiovis. Transl. 6, 1–7. doi: 10.47476/jat.v6i2.2023.309
Schmeidler, E., and Kirchner, C. (2001). Adding audio description: does it make a difference? J. Vis. Impair. Blindn. 95, 197–212. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0109500402
Shen, L., and Lei, M. (2021). Serving the visually impaired with AD: taking the “my voice your eyes” charity project in Hangzhou as an example. China Broadcasts 331, 74–76. doi: 10.16694/j.cnki.zggb.2021.01.020
Snyder, J. (2010). Audio description guidelines and best practices. Available online at: https://adp.acb.org/ad.html (Accessed October 20, 2024).
Soler Gallego, S., and Luque Colemero, M. O. (2023). Increased subjectivity in audio description of visual art: a focus group reception study of content minimalism and interpretive voicing. J. Audiovis. Transl. 6, 55–76. doi: 10.47476/jat.v6i2.2023.248
Soler Gallego, S., and Luque Colmenero, M. O. (2022). User reception of minority and creative approaches to visual art audio description: poetry, metaphor and Synaesthesia. Status Quaest. 23, 53–74. doi: 10.13133/2239-1983/18224
Szarkowska, A. (2013). Auteur description: from the Director’s creative vision to audio description. J. Visual Impair. Blindn. 107, 383–387. doi: 10.1177/0145482X1310700507
Tor-Carroggio, I., and Casas-Tost, H. (2020). “Who is currently audio describing in China? A study of Chinese audio describer profiles” in Translation and media accessibility: From theory to practice. eds. M. Richart-Marset and F. Calamita (Sant Vicent del Raspeig: Publicacions de la Universitat d’Alacant), 78–107.
Tor-Carroggio, I., and Rovira-Esteva, S. (2019). Listening to Chinese blind and partially-sighted users: a questionnaire-based study. Available onlineat: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/presentacions/2019/203481/ARSAD2019_RoviraEsteva_TorCarroggio.pdf (Accessed October 20, 2024).
Udo, J. P., Acevedo, B., and Fels, D. I. (2010). Horatio audio-describes Shakespeare’s hamlet: blind and low-vision theatre-goers evaluate an unconventional audio description strategy. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 28, 139–156. doi: 10.1177/0264619609359753
Udo, J. P., and Fels, D. I. (2009). Suit the action to the word, the word to the action: an unconventional approach to describing Shakespeare’s hamlet. J. Visual Impair. Blindn. 103, 178–183. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0910300307
Vercauteren, G. (2007). “Towards a European guideline for audio description” in Media for all. Accessibility in audiovisual translation. eds. J. Díaz Cintas, P. Orero, and A. Remael (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 139–150.
Walczak, A. (2017). Measuring immersion in audio description with polish blind and visually impaired audiences. Int. J. Transl. 19, 33–48. doi: 10.13137/2421-6763/17350
Walczak, A., and Fryer, L. (2017). Creative description: the impact of audio description style on presence in visually impaired audiences. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 35, 6–17. doi: 10.1177/0264619616661603
Walczak, A., and Fryer, L. (2018). Vocal delivery of audio description by genre: measuring users’ presence. Perspectives 26, 69–83. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1298634
Wang, J., and Wang, H. (2020). Re-producing from image to hearing: a study of accessible film production. China Journal. Commun. J. 1, 49–59.
Xiao, W., and Dong, L. (2020). New development of audiovisual translation: application of speech synthesis in audio description: based on reception experiments and surveys for the visually impaired. East J. Transl. 64, 24–30.
Yang, H., Shen, W., Liu, B., and Wang, Y. (2023). A pilot study on the availability and reception of audio description in the Chinese mainland. Fron. Commun. 8:1114853. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1114853
Keywords: audio description, presence, subjective, objective, Chinese visually impaired
Citation: Yang H, Xie D and Li Y (2025) The impact of film audio description style on presence in Chinese visually impaired audiences. Front. Psychol. 16:1541539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541539
Edited by:
Celia Andreu-Sánchez, Autonomous Univfersity of Barcelona, SpainReviewed by:
Xin Li, The University of Manchester, United KingdomFloriane Bardini, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Spain
Copyright © 2025 Yang, Xie and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hui Yang, TGFuemhvdXlhbmdodWlAMTYzLmNvbQ==