- 1Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, and Music Cognition Laboratory, Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, KA, India
- 2Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Clinical Psychology, Music Cognition Laboratory, Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance CPH - Intermediate Fellow (IA/CPHI/17/1/503348), National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscienes (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
- 3Department of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, KA, India
- 4Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, KA, India
Background: Social cognition (SC), the ability to interpret and respond to social situations appropriately, is essential for effective interpersonal functioning. Challenges in these areas are a core feature of depression. Evidence shows mixed findings regarding the extent and presence of these deficits in depression, especially in its milder forms. SC comprises key processes such as the theory of mind (ToM), attribution style, emotion, and social perception. In addition to exploring emotion perception (EP) ability through faces and vocal stimuli, music has recently emerged as a valuable tool in studying EP, given the effectiveness of music intervention in improving mood and overall emotional functioning in patients with depression.
Aim: This study aimed to explore social cognition abilities in patients with mild–moderate major depressive disorder (MDD) and investigate the relationship between SC and neurocognition in depression.
Methods: Nineteen patients diagnosed with mild–moderate MDD and eighteen age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls (HCs) (n = 18) were assessed using the Social Cognition Rating tools in the Indian Setting (SOCRATIS), the NIMHANS Emotion Perception Test (NEPT; assessing facial and prosodic domains), and the Music Emotion Perception Test (MEPT).
Results: Patients with MDD showed significant deficits in first-order ToM (FOT) compared to HCs (p = 0.01). On the music emotion recognition test, the MDD group rated the intensity of positive emotions (e.g., happiness) significantly lower than the HC group (p = 0.007). However, no significant group differences were found in the accuracy of emotion identification across facial, prosodic, or musical stimuli. Correlational analyses revealed trends toward significant positive associations between attention and second-order ToM (SOT; r = 0.58, p < 0.01), as well as between the executive function (EF) index and EP (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), SOT (r = 0.56, p = 0.01), and social perception (r = 0.60, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Individuals with mild–moderate depression show reduced FOT ability and emotion scaling of positive emotions on music excerpts. A potential association exists between neurocognitive (attention and EFs) and SC measures.
Introduction
Depression is one of the leading mental health concerns (James et al., 2018; Proudman et al., 2021), often accompanied by impairment in social and interpersonal functioning. These difficulties have been linked to deficits in social cognition (SC), a set of cognitive and affective processes that help us perceive, interpret, and respond appropriately to social information (Kupferberg and Hasler, 2023; Ladegaard et al., 2014; Porter-Vignola et al., 2022). SC plays a crucial role in effective communication, perspective-taking, and developing adaptive coping strategies (Kan et al., 2004).
SC impairments, including difficulties in emotion identification, decoding affective prosody, and inferring the mental states of others, are strongly associated with the psychopathological severity of depression (Knight and Baune, 2019; Porcelli et al., 2019). Misperception of social cues, perceived social rejection, and hypervigilance around social situations as a result of SC impairments can further lead to a sense of loneliness, social isolation, poor social support, interpersonal conflicts, and altered quality of life in individuals with depression (Kupferberg and Hasler, 2023; Saris et al., 2017; Weightman et al., 2019).
While SC has been extensively explored in conditions such as psychosis and autism, research in depression is relatively limited. The extent of SC impairment in depression is often subtle (Bazin et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2008; Weightman et al., 2019), and linked to illness severity (Air et al., 2015), yet their impact can be clinically significant. The systematic exploration of SC so far has been limited to individual processes [such as the theory of mind (ToM) and emotion recognition], with limited exploration of SC as a cohesive construct (Weightman et al., 2014).
Key components of SC and its relation to depression
Broadly, SC encompasses key processes, including ToM, attribution style, emotion perception (EP), and social perception (Green, 2005; Etchepare and Prouteau, 2017; Pinkham et al., 2013). Of these, facial EP (FEP) and ToM are SC's most extensively studied facets (Sencan, 2019).
Theory of mind
ToM refers to the ability to interpret the complex mental states of others (Premack and Woodruff, 1978). It is generally conceptualized into two subsystems: cognitive ToM (interpretation of beliefs and intentions) and affective ToM (inferences regarding the emotional states of others). Studies have shown impaired ToM in depression, highlighting deficits in both cognitive and affective ToM tasks (Ladegaard et al., 2014; Wolkenstein et al., 2011; Zobel et al., 2010). The ability to interpret mental states involves both automatic, stimulus-driven processes and reflective, controlled processes, which can be disrupted in those with depression, leading to biases in interpreting others' intentions (Olsson and Ochsner, 2007). Not all evidence, however, shows ToM impairments, with some studies reporting ToM deficits to be either temporary (that improves during remission) (Ladegaard et al., 2014) or even comparable to healthy controls (HCs; Wilbertz et al., 2010).
Attribution style
Attribution refers to the cause that individuals ascribe to some event. Earlier cognitive models of depression proposed that individuals with depression have a depressogenic inferential style resulting in the attribution of adverse life events to internal, global, and stable causes (Abramson et al., 1989) and positive events to external, specific, and unstable causes (Seligman et al., 1979). These attributions can directly influence emotional responses, which may explain why individuals with depression show heightened sensitivity to negative social cues. Despite widespread acceptance of depressogenic attribution styles, research findings are inconsistent, particularly in mild depression (Alloy and Abramson, 1988; Dennard and Hokanson, 1986).
Emotion perception
EP, an individual's ability to recognize and understand others' emotional states is among the most consistently impaired SC processes in depression (Dalili et al., 2015; Kan et al., 2004; Kraus et al., 2019; Peron et al., 2011; Phillips et al., 2003). FEP tasks are the most commonly employed paradigms in depression, revealing poor EP accuracy (Dalili et al., 2015; Kohler et al., 2011; Krause et al., 2021; Naranjo et al., 2011; Schirmer and Adolphs, 2017), negative interpretation of neutral faces (Leppänen et al., 2004), and blunted responsiveness to positive emotions (Bourke et al., 2010; Joormann and Gotlib, 2006; Langenecker et al., 2005; Surguladze et al., 2005; Suslow et al., 2004). These observations align with cognitive theories of depression (Beck, 1963), highlighting mood-congruent attentional biases (Bourke et al., 2010; Bower, 1981). EP co-occurs across many modalities, such as speech prosody, body language, and gestures (Schirmer and Adolphs, 2017; Uekermann et al., 2008) and is not limited to facial expressions alone. Emotions are recognized quickly and accurately when presented in multimodal formats (a combination of face and voice) (Garrido-Vásquez et al., 2011; Paulmann et al., 2009; Schirmer and Adolphs, 2017). A few studies exploring EP through prosody in depression reported that negativity bias outlined for FEP could also be extended to vocal stimuli (Peron et al., 2011; Uekermann et al., 2008).
Interestingly, a growing body of evidence explores music emotion perception (MEP) as a novel dimension of EP (Al'tman et al., 2012; Naranjo et al., 2011; Punkanen et al., 2011).
Music emotion perception
Music is a powerful medium through which emotions are evoked and conveyed (Juslin and Laukka, 2004). Our ability to recognize or respond to music-evoked emotions is present from infancy (Trehub, 2003), strongly justifying musical stimuli in emotion studies. Music emotion studies have primarily explored EP (Juslin and Laukka, 2004; Punkanen et al., 2011), physiological changes induced by music (Hodges, 2011), and emotion regulation by music (Saarikallio, 2010). Individuals with depression have been shown to react more intensely to sad music (Bodner et al., 2007), which has been interpreted through the lens of cognitive theories of depression that highlight negative schemas and bias toward sad emotions (Bodner et al., 2007). MEP deficits, if present, may reflect broader impairments in perceptual-affective processing. Exploring EP deficits through music, in addition to faces and prosody, could give us valuable insights into whether they are due to a disruption in more fundamental perceptual attunement mechanisms, irrespective of modality, or whether contextual cognitive biases in interpersonal settings primarily drive them.
In summary, given limited studies with inconsistent findings in the area of SC in depression, it is important to have a deeper understanding of these abilities in order to gain further insights into the clinical condition. Although the majority of studies have included patients with severe depression, it is imperative to investigate whether the nature of these deficits is similar in mild–moderate depression (Hale, 1998; Kohler et al., 2011; Ladegaard et al., 2014; Peron et al., 2011; Van Vleet et al., 2019; Zobel et al., 2010). Additionally, examining EP deficits through music offers a novel lens to capture perceptual-affective disturbances, as music engages core emotional systems. This is also relevant, given the increasing evidence for the use of music therapy in ameliorating cognitive and emotional disturbances associated with various neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia (Aalbers et al., 2017; Geretsegger et al., 2017; Hegde, 2014; Kraus et al., 2019; Thaut, 2010).
The present study aimed to examine SC in the domains of ToM, attribution style, and EP in individuals with mild–moderate depression compared to matched HCs. This sample's neurocognitive and music-cognitive abilities have been reported previously (Raghavendra et al., 2022). In this study, we have also examined the relationship between neurocognition and SC.
Methodology
Participants
Patients diagnosed with mild or moderate MDD (n = 19) and age-, sex-, and education-matched HCs (n = 18) comprised the sample. The sample size was calculated based on estimates from previous studies using 80% power and a 0.05 significance level (Naranjo et al., 2011). The diagnosis was made as per the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10; World Health Organization, 1993). Patients were recruited from the outpatient services of a tertiary mental health and neuroscience institute. The author MK carried out a clinical evaluation and confirmed the diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with severe MDD, bipolar depression, and suicidal ideation, and those having a current or past history of comorbid psychiatric, neurological, or neurodevelopmental conditions were excluded from the current study. HCs were recruited from the community using the convenient sampling method, where participants were recruited based on their ease of availability. All participants were right-handed, as screened on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971).
Tools
Sociodemographic and clinical details and music behavior data were recorded. The music behavior data included details such as participants' music listening habits, music preferences, attitudes toward using music in interventions, perceived benefits of music listening, and self-rated ability to perceive rhythm and remember tunes on a scale of 1–10, with higher scores corresponding to greater ability (Raghavendra et al., 2022).
Screening tools
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD; Hamilton, 1986) was used to assess the severity of depression in patients. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) was used to screen for psychological distress in HCs.
Outcome measures
1. NIMHANS Emotion Perception test (NEPT) assessed EP across facial and prosody communication channels. The tool has been validated on the Indian population. It comprises six subtests of emotion perception: facial expression identification, prosody identification, facial expression discrimination, prosody discrimination, facial expression-prosody discrimination, and verbal-prosody discrimination. Facial emotion identification and discrimination tasks used still photographs of faces depicting varied emotions. Prosody identification and discrimination consisted of samples of spoken sentences in gibberish language or meaningful sentences (in verbal prosody identification/discrimination). In identification tasks, participants were asked to choose the emotion depicted through faces or voices from the list of seven emotions: happy, sad, anger, fear, surprise, disgust, and neutral. In discrimination tasks, the control tasks, participants were asked to discriminate whether the emotions portrayed in each pair were the same or different (Rani, 2009).
2. The Musical Emotion Perception task (MEPT) consisted of 32 musical excerpts (van Tricht et al., 2010). Each excerpt conveyed a specific emotion, and participants were asked to identify the emotion from a list of emotions—happy, sad, fearful, and angry. The participants were also asked to rate the intensity of emotion perceived in each excerpt, on a scale of 1–10, higher score indicating greater intensity.
3. SC Rating tools in the Indian Setting (SOCRATIS) assessed social cognitive abilities in three domains: (1) ToM task, which included first-order and second-order ToM tasks (FOT/SOT), Metaphor irony tasks, and faux pas recognition test, assessing both cognitive and affective ToM. (2) Attribution style—Internal, Personal, and Situational attributions questionnaire (IPSAQ; Kinderman and Bentall) was used to assess attribution style. This comprised 32 hypothetical social situations, and respondents had to make causal attributions, which were classified as internal (to self) or external (personal or situational). (3) Social Perception SoCuReTi (Social cue recognition test in an Indian setting)—four high emotion and four low emotion videos of social situations were shown to respondents. For each video, respondents answer true–false statements about social cues (rules, affect, and goals) and non-social facts (sights and sounds) (Mehta et al., 2011).
All the scores were computed automatically by the SOCRATIS software [SOCRATIS was developed at NIMHANS (National institute of mental health and neurosciences), Bangalore, India (Mehta et al., 2011)]. Scores were computed for ToM [FOT and SOT index, faux pas composite index (FPCI)], attribution style [externalizing bias (EB) and personalizing bias (PB)], and SoCuReTi [Social perception index (SPI)]. A positive EB score suggests that the individual attributes more positive events to self than adverse events (self-serving bias). As a corollary, it also indicates the tendency to attribute adverse events to external causes. On the other hand, A PB score above 0.5 indicates a tendency to use personal rather than situational external attributions for adverse events.
Procedure
The current study received approval from the Institute's Ethics Committee (No. NIMH/DO/BEH.Sc.Div/2017-18). All the tools and scales were administered after obtaining written informed consent from the participant. The assessments were conducted in a controlled laboratory setting within a tertiary mental health care center, and the total assessment duration was ~2 h. After collecting relevant sociodemographic and clinical data, these tests were administered in the sequence listed in the tools section. The participant's responses for NEPT and MEPT were manually recorded and scored, whereas the SOCRATIS tool was administered through computerized software, automatically generating scores for each sub-test.
Upon completion, feedback about test findings was provided, and psychotherapy referrals were facilitated as needed.
Statistical analysis
The raw data were coded and analyzed for Windows using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0; IBM Corp., 2013). Descriptive analysis, such as mean, standard deviation, and frequencies, was carried out for the sociodemographic and clinical data (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1. Sociodemographic details of participants (Raghavendra et al., 2022).

Table 2. Clinical status of the MDD group (n = 19) (Raghavendra et al., 2022).
The Mann–Whitney U-test, a non-parametric test, was used to compare the two independent groups—MDD and HC on tests of EP (facial, prosody, and music EP domains) and SC (Tables 3, 4). Effect sizes (rank biserial correlation) were calculated to understand the magnitude of differences. Spearman's correlation assessed the relationship among EP, SC, and neurocognitive indices (Table 5). These statistical approaches were chosen due to violations of normality assumptions and limited sample size (Howell, 2013; Kothari, 2004).

Table 3. Comparison between MDD and HC groups on domains of social cognition using Mann–Whitney U-test.

Table 4. Comparison between MDD and HC groups on rating intensity of perceived emotions on music emotion perception test using the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Given the multiple correlation tests between variables carried out in the study, the significance threshold, alpha (α), was set at 0.001 to account for multiplicity using the formula (α/number of tests), that is, 0.05/32 (Streiner and Norman, 2011).
The correlations with p-values between 0.01 and 0.001 (0.01 > p > 0.001) showed a trend toward significance, indicating potential associations warranting further exploration.
Results
The sample consisted of 19 patients diagnosed with mild–moderate MDD (MDD: n = 19; M:F = 7:12; mean age (years) 28±6), and age, sex, and education matched HCs [n = 18; M:F = 7:11; mean age (years) 28.1±7.5]. The two groups did not differ significantly on any of the sociodemographic variables (Table 1).
Comparison of performance on tests of SC between MDD and HC participants
The groups were compared on all the key processes of SC, including ToM, attribution styles, social perception, and EP, including MEP (Table 3).
Theory of mind
The groups differed significantly on the FOT task, with a medium effect size (p = 0.01, effect size = 0.33), with the MDD group performing poorer than HC. However, there was no significant difference between the groups on the SOT and FPCI.
Attribution style
No significant difference was observed between the groups on both EB and PB. However, on comparing the median scores, it was observed that the MDD group had a greater tendency toward both PB and self-serving bias.
Social perception
The groups did not differ significantly on SPI.
Emotion perception
The groups did not show significant differences in the accuracy of perceiving emotions (emotion identification) on facial or prosody identification and discrimination (Table 3).
Music emotion perception
The findings indicate that the groups differed significantly on intensity rating for “happiness” emotion, with a large effect size, on the MEP (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.51; Table 4), although they did not differ on the accuracy of EP. The excerpts conveying “happiness” were rated lower in intensity by the MDD group in comparison to the HC group (Table 4).
Correlational analyses
The relationship between neurocognition and SC domains was explored using Spearman's rho (Table 5). For neurocognitive data, the neurocognitive indices (attention, executive functions (EFs), and learning, and memory indices) were derived from the dataset of our previously published study on music and neurocognition in depression (Raghavendra et al., 2022).
Of all neurocognitive indices, there was a trend toward significance for the correlation between EF index and EP (r = 0.60, p = 0.006), SOT (r = 0.56, p = 0.01), and SPI (r = 0.61, p = 0.007). Focused attention was also marginally associated with the SOT (r = 0.58, p < 0.01).
No significant correlations were seen between (1) learning and memory index and any of the SC variables, (2) attribution (PB and EB) and any of the neurocognitive indices, and (3) FPCI and any of the neurocognitive indices.
Discussion
The present study explored SC in individuals with mild–moderate depression (MDD) in domains of ToM, attribution style, and EP (facial, prosodic, and musical), in comparison to age, sex, and education-matched HCs.
Individuals with MDD showed significantly poorer FOT when compared to HC, which is partially consistent with the literature suggesting ToM deficits in depression (Bertoux et al., 2012; Bora and Berk, 2016; Kettle et al., 2008; Wilbertz et al., 2010). However, performance on SOT and faux pas recognition tasks did not show group differences, indicating preserved ability. The research exploring ToM abilities in depression generally has shown mixed findings, with few studies indicating no consistent underperformance on ToM tasks (Nestor et al., 2022). Some studies similarly showed preserved cognitive ToM (Berecz et al., 2016), but deficits in affective ToM (Harkness et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2005; Nejati et al., 2012). In our study, FOT was impaired, whereas SOT, which is more cognitively complex, was preserved. We speculate that difficulties in the initial attention allocation, possibly due to subtle cognitive deficits (Raghavendra et al., 2022) or affective/motivational fluctuations, may have caused this. Though higher-order ToM appears preserved, its clinical relevance is crucial. Tasks requiring higher-order reasoning abilities may still challenge these patients in day-to-day situations. Using dynamic and ecologically valid measures may help assess subtle deficits more effectively.
Significant group differences were not observed even on attribution style, which contrasts classic attribution models suggesting a depressogenic inferential style (Abramson et al., 1978, 1989). Our findings may be influenced by milder depression symptom severity, which is associated with enhanced attribution accuracy (Alloy and Abramson, 1988). Although the groups did not differ significantly in attribution styles, the MDD group showed tendencies toward self-serving bias (positive scores on EB) and personalizing bias (attributing adverse events to people rather than situations). These patterns align with previous reviews suggesting that, while individuals with depression may agree more with internal attributions for failure, they tend to favor external attributions for failure and internal attributions for success when compared to those without depression (Coyne and Gotlib, 1983; Zuroff, 1981).
Additionally, the groups did not differ in the accuracy of EPs via faces, prosody, or music. These findings align with previous studies reporting intact FEP abilities in depression (Kan et al., 2004; Peron et al., 2011; Schaefer et al., 2010; Suslow et al., 2004), although certain meta-analytic studies suggest mixed results with small-to-moderate effect sizes on facial emotion recognition and prosody identification capacity (Dalili et al., 2015; Kohler et al., 2011; Krause et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2020). However, the MDD group differed in rating the intensity of positive emotion (happiness) expressed by the excerpt, which can be attributed to blunted reactivity or reduced reward sensitivity (Pizzagalli et al., 2008). This dissociation between accurate EP and reduced intensity rating highlights the difference between perceived emotion (cognitive appraisal) and felt emotion (nuanced affective experience) (Kallinen and Rkanavaja, 2006). Few studies that have explored emotions induced by music in those with depression (Bodner et al., 2007; Sakka and Juslin, 2017) showed some differences in the way individuals with depression respond to music. Overall, the EP accuracy seems to be intact, with alterations seen in interpretations of emotional intensity. It is important to note, however, that the EP task used in the current study captured the ability to perceive universal basic emotions and did not include complex emotions such as pride, shame, or guilt. This could have resulted in the ceiling effect, masking subtle deficits in milder forms of depression.
Overall, SC deficits in those with mild–moderate depression appear subtle. Symptom severity can, however, moderate these deficits (Air et al., 2015), with evidence suggesting that mild depressive symptoms can paradoxically enhance SC performance (Harkness et al., 2005) due to enhanced sensitivity to social cues as a compensatory mechanism in the symptomatic phase. This could explain the relatively preserved SC in our sample, whereas severe depression can lead to generalized impairment due to motivational symptoms overshadowing social sensitivity (Lee et al., 2005). In addition to severity being a crucial factor, it is important to note that most participants were young adults and educated (Table 1) in our sample. These variables are also known to modulate SC measures (De Souza et al., 2018; Fittipaldi et al., 2024; Li et al., 2012).
Relationship between SC and neurocognitive indices in depression
The current study explored the association between SC and neurocognition in MDD. Neurocognitive indices were derived from a prior study published by the same authors (Raghavendra et al., 2022). Correlational analysis revealed marginal associations between EFs with emotion perception, SOT, and social perception. Focused attention was also marginally associated with the SOT, though significant relationships were not found between any variables.
The current literature on depression highlights a significant relationship between neurocognition and SC abilities (Uekermann et al., 2008; Zobel et al., 2010). In particular, components of EFs are known to be implicated in SC (Yang et al., 2015). Understanding and interpreting socio-emotional, such as affective decoding, understanding social cues, others' mental states, and intentions, requires both attention and EFs. Specifically, attention to relevant details, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control helps individuals hold and manipulate the current information based on context and memories and switch to an alternative perspective in a social situation while suppressing one's perspective (Moreau and Champagne-Lavau, 2014; Pagnoni et al., 2022; Thoma et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2015).
For example, identifying emotion through faces requires active visual scanning of the stimulus and integration of the visual information with pre-existing semantic knowledge about facial expressions, requiring working memory and inhibitory control (Muñoz Ladrón de Guevara et al., 2021). Similarly, EF and affective prosody recognition are also related, especially when the affective and semantic content of the prosodic stimuli are incongruent. Specific SC–neurocognition associations in our study suggest that individuals with mild–moderate depression may rely on executive and attentional resources actively for specific SC tasks, but not uniformly across all SC measures.
The absence of significant associations between SC constructs and learning and memory index (LMI) warrants further exploration, particularly given the known role of our memories from the past (autobiographical memory) and childhood experiences in navigating social information (Spreng, 2013; Takim et al., 2024). Although memory aids in retrieving, updating, and interpreting information about people and situations, this relationship may not be captured by standard memory assessments. The memory tasks, like the ones used in this study, focus on real-time learning and retention of new information (word lists or a geometric figure) with limited personal relevance. On the other hand, the SC tasks engage real-time cognitive processes, such as EF, which may explain the stronger links between EF and SC in previous studies (Lancaster et al., 2003). Moreover, our sample showed minimal cognitive deficits (Raghavendra et al., 2022). In severe conditions, where both EF and memory are significantly impaired, SC deficits may become more pronounced (Lancaster et al., 2003).
Attribution style also showed no significant associations with neurocognition. Attribution style, which is generally trait-based and describes stable dispositions shaped by our personality and schemas (Peterson and Seligman, 1984), may have minimal loading on active cognitive processes.
Surprisingly, the faux pas index (a relevant component of ToM) did not correlate with EF, despite evidence supporting links between ToM and EFs (Förster et al., 2018; López-Navarro, 2018; Pagnoni et al., 2022; Schmid et al., 2021). While a few studies have examined faux pas recognition as an individual construct, to our knowledge, none have done so in depression. A recent study that explored these variables in individuals with alcohol use disorder reported that the overall faux pas recognition scores did not correlate with EF. However, specific components (e.g., faux pas knowledge and faux pas identification) related significantly to EF measures such as working memory, inhibition, and mental flexibility (Schmid et al., 2021). The findings also indicated that these variables may involve overlapping but distinct cognitive mechanisms, especially those with milder deficits. In our study, the use of composites did not allow us to explore domain-specific associations. Although correlations between FPCI and EF were not significant, especially after the correction (p = 0.03), the trend suggests a possible link worth exploring with a larger sample.
These interpretations cannot be overgeneralized and should be viewed with caution due to limitations such as small sample size and lack of robust analyses. In addition, illness severity could play a crucial role in defining the relationship between SC and neurocognitive variables, which is worth exploring in future studies. Further studies incorporating ecologically valid cognitive measures could capture the complexity of these interactions.
Conclusion
The present study reveals that individuals with mild–moderate MDD show FOT deficits and differences in the subjective experience of emotional intensity, particularly for positive affect, compared to HC. A potential association exists between attention and SOT and EFs with emotion perception, SOT, and social perception.
This is one of the few studies exploring the elements of SC and its relation to neurocognition, especially in milder forms of depression. However, most studies have explored associations between severity and social cognitive measures in heterogeneous clinical samples of varying severity (Air et al., 2015; Gollan et al., 2010). A limited number of studies have examined EP in depression through a multimodal approach (Campanella et al., 2010; Garrido-Vásquez et al., 2011; Müller et al., 2013; Scibelli et al., 2016), with fewer addressing this topic in an impersonal domain like music (Naranjo et al., 2011). The comprehensive approach, encompassing various domains of SC, sets it apart from studies focusing on individual tests or domains. These findings have implications for adding more profound value to our understanding of these constructs, designing socio-cognitive interventions, and using music therapy in depression. Intervention designs aiming to improve SC in depression may need to be tailored separately through cognitive remediation approaches. Finally, the relative preservation of SC in mild–moderate depression indicates a window for early intervention before the emergence of global deficits, as seen in severe cases.
Limitations and future directions
We acknowledge several limitations of this study. The small sample size challenges the power and the generalizability of the findings, and the cross-sectional design prevents causal inferences about the directionality between SC and neurocognition. Longitudinal and multi-site studies with larger sample sizes, the use of multivariate statistics to explore mediators and moderators, the inclusion of Indian music excerpts for cultural relevance, and the incorporation of dynamic and ecologically valid measures can enhance a more profound understanding and reliability of these findings. It is also crucial to explore individual EF measures in relation to specific SC measures, given evidence for possible domain-specific associations.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Insititute Ethics Committee, National Institute of Mental health and Neurosciences. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
PR: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SH: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MP: Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Government of India, through grant number 367/(NET-JULY2016).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Prathyusha, Research Assistant, Department of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, for assisting with data verification and analysis. We thank all the participants for consenting to participate in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Aalbers, S., Fusar-Poli, L., Freeman, R. E., Spreen, M., Ket, J. C., Vink, A. C., et al. (2017). Music therapy for depression. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 11:CD004517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004517.pub3
Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., and Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: a theory-based subtype of depression. Psychol. Rev. 96:358. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., and Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 87, 49–74. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49
Air, T., Weightman, M. J., and Baune, B. T. (2015). Symptom severity of depressive symptoms impacts on social cognition performance in current but not remitted major depressive disorder. Front. Psychol. 6:1118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01118
Alloy, L. B., and Abramson, L. Y. (1988). “Depressive realism: four theoretical perspectives,” in Cognitive Processes in Depression, L. B. Alloy (The Guilford Press), 223–265.
Al'tman, Y. A., Alyanchikova, Y. O., Guzikov, B. M., and Zakharova, L. E. (2012). Estimation of short musical fragments in normal subjects and patients with chronic depression. Hum. Physiol. 26, 553–557. doi: 10.1007/BF02760371
Bazin, N., Brunet-Gouet, E., Bourdet, C., Kayser, N., Falissard, B., Hardy-Baylé, M.-C., et al. (2009). Quantitative assessment of attribution of intentions to others in schizophrenia using an ecological video-based task: a comparison with manic and depressed patients. Psychiatry Res. 167, 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.12.010
Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression: I. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 9, 324–333. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720160014002
Berecz, H., Tényi, T., and Herold, R. (2016). Theory of mind in depressive disorders: a review of the literature. Psychopathology 49, 125–134. doi: 10.1159/000446707
Bertoux, M., Delavest, M., de Souza, L. C., Funkiewiez, A., Lepine, J. P., Fossati, P., et al. (2012). Social cognition and emotional assessment differentiates frontotemporal dementia from depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 83, 411–416. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301849
Bodner, E., Iancu, I., Gilboa, A., Sarel, A., Mazor, A., Amir, D., et al. (2007). Finding words for emotions: the reactions of patients with major depressive disorder towards various musical excerpts. Arts Psychother. 34, 142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2006.12.002
Bora, E., and Berk, M. (2016). Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 191, 49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.023
Bourke, C., Douglas, K., and Porter, R. (2010). Processing of facial emotion expression in major depression: a review. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 44, 681–696. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.496359
Campanella, S., Bruyer, R., Froidbise, S., Rossignol, M., Joassin, F., Kornreich, C., et al. (2010). Is two better than one? A cross-modal oddball paradigm reveals greater sensitivity of the P300 to emotional face-voice associations. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 1855–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.004
Coyne, J. C., and Gotlib, I. H. (1983). The role of cognition in depression: a critical appraisal. Psychol. Bull. 94:472. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.472
Dalili, M. N., Penton-Voak, I. S., Harmer, C. J., and Munafo, M. R. (2015). Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder. Psychol. Med. 45, 1135–1144. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002591
De Souza, L. C., Bertoux, M., De Faria, Â. R. V., Corgosinho, L. T. S., De Almeida Prado, A. C., Barbosa, I. G., et al. (2018). The effects of gender, age, schooling, and cultural background on the identification of facial emotions: a transcultural study. Int. Psychogeriatr. 30, 1861–1870. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000443
Dennard, D. O., and Hokanson, J. E. (1986). Performance on two cognitive tasks by dysphoric and nondysphoric students. Cognit. Ther. Res. 10, 377–386. doi: 10.1007/BF01173473
Etchepare, A., and Prouteau, A. (2017). Toward a two-dimensional model of social cognition in clinical neuropsychology: a systematic review of factor structure studies. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 24, 391–404. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001163
Fittipaldi, S., Legaz, A., Maito, M., Hernandez, H., Altschuler, F., Canziani, V., et al. (2024). Heterogeneous factors influence social cognition across diverse settings in brain health and age-related diseases. Nat. Ment. Health 2, 63–75. doi: 10.1038/s44220-023-00164-3
Förster, K., Jörgens, S., Air, T. M., Bürger, C., Enneking, V., Redlich, R., et al. (2018). The relationship between social cognition and executive function in major depressive disorder in high-functioning adolescents and young adults. Psychiatry Res. 263, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.046
Garrido-Vásquez, P., Jessen, S., and Kotz, S. A. (2011). Perception of emotion in psychiatric disorders: on the possible role of task, dynamics, and multimodality. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 515–536. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.620771
Geretsegger, M., Mössler, K. A., Bieleninik, Ł., Chen, X. J., Heldal, T. O., Gold, C., et al. (2017). Music therapy for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like disorders. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 5:Cd004025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004025.pub4
Gollan, J. K., McCloskey, M., Hoxha, D., and Coccaro, E. F. (2010). How do depressed and healthy adults interpret nuanced facial expressions? J. Abnorm. Psychol. 119, 804–810. doi: 10.1037/a0020234
Green, M. F. (2005). Social cognition in schizophrenia: recommendations from the measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia new approaches conference. Schizophr. Bull. 31, 882–887. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi049
Hale, W. W. III. (1998). Judgment of facial expressions and depression persistence. Psychiatry Res. 80, 265–274. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1781(98)00070-5
Hamilton, M. (1986). “The Hamilton rating scale for depression,” in Assessment of Depression, eds. N. Sartorius, and T. A. Ban (Cham: Springer), 143–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-70486-4_14
Harkness, K., Sabbagh, M., Jacobson, J., Chowdrey, N., and Chen, T. (2005). Enhanced accuracy of mental state decoding in dysphoric college students. Cogn. Emot. 19, 999–1025. doi: 10.1080/02699930541000110
Harkness, K. L., Washburn, D., Theriault, J. E., Lee, L., and Sabbagh, M. A. (2011). Maternal history of depression is associated with enhanced theory of mind in depressed and nondepressed adult women. Psychiatry Res. 189, 91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.007
Hegde, S. (2014). Music-based cognitive remediation therapy for patients with traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurol. 5:34. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00034
Hodges, D. A. (2011). “Bodily responses to music,” in Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology, eds. S. Hallam, I. Cross, and M. Thaut (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 121–130. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298457.013.0011
Howell, D. C. (2013). Statistical methods for Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
James, S. L., Abate, D., Abate, K. H., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., et al. (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
Joormann, J., and Gotlib, I. H. (2006). Is this happiness I see? Biases in the identification of emotional facial expressions in depression and social phobia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115:705. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.705
Juslin, P. N., and Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: a review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. J. New Music Res. 33, 217–238. doi: 10.1080/0929821042000317813
Kallinen, K., and Rkanavaja, N. (2006). Emotion perceived and emotion felt: same and different. Music. Sci. 10, 191–213. doi: 10.1177/102986490601000203
Kan, Y., Mimura, M., Kamijima, K., and Kawamura, M. (2004). Recognition of emotion from moving facial and prosodic stimuli in depressed patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75, 1667–1671. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.036079
Kettle, J. W., O'Brien-Simpson, L., and Allen, N. B. (2008). Impaired theory of mind in first-episode schizophrenia: comparison with community, university and depressed controls. Schizophr. Res. 99, 96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.011
Knight, M. J., and Baune, B. T. (2019). The direct and indirect relationship between social cognition and psychosocial dysfunction in major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry 10:347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00347
Kohler, C. G., Hoffman, L. J., Eastman, L. B., Healey, K., and Moberg, P. J. (2011). Facial emotion perception in depression and bipolar disorder: a quantitative review. Psychiatry Res. 188, 303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.019
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
Kraus, M. S., Walker, T. M., Jarskog, L. F., Millet, R. A., and Keefe, R. S. E. (2019). Basic auditory processing deficits and their association with auditory emotion recognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 204, 155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.08.031
Krause, F. C., Linardatos, E., Fresco, D. M., and Moore, M. T. (2021). Facial emotion recognition in major depressive disorder: a meta-analytic review. J. Affect. Disord. 293, 320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.053
Kupferberg, A., and Hasler, G. (2023). The social cost of depression: investigating the impact of impaired social emotion regulation, social cognition, and interpersonal behavior on social functioning. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 14:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100631
Ladegaard, N., Lysaker, P. H., Larsen, E. R., and Videbech, P. (2014). A comparison of capacities for social cognition and metacognition in first episode and prolonged depression. Psychiatry Res. 220, 883–889. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.10.005
Lancaster, R. S., Evans, J. D., Bond, G. R., and Lysaker, P. H. (2003). Social cognition and neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. J. Nervous Ment. Dis. 191, 295–299. doi: 10.1097/01.NMD.0000066151.34561.DE
Langenecker, S. A., Bieliauskas, L. A., Rapport, L. J., Zubieta, J. K., Wilde, E. A., Berent, S., et al. (2005). Face emotion perception and executive functioning deficits in depression. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 27, 320–333. doi: 10.1080/13803390490490515720
Lee, L., Harkness, K. L., Sabbagh, M. A., and Jacobson, J. A. (2005). Mental state decoding abilities in clinical depression. J. Affect. Disord. 86, 247–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.007
Leppänen, J., Milders, M., Bell, J., Terriere, E., and Hietanen, J. (2004). Depression biases the recognition of emotionally neutral faces. Psychiatry Res. 128, 123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.05.020
Li, X., Wang, K., Wang, F., Tao, Q., Xie, Y., Cheng, Q., et al. (2012). Aging of theory of mind: the influence of educational level and cognitive processing. Int. J. Psychol. 48, 715–727. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.673724
López-Navarro, E. (2018). Contributions of executive functions components to affective and cognitive theory of mind in out-patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 269, 124–125. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.018
Mehta, U. M., Thirthalli, J., Naveen Kumar, C., Mahadevaiah, M., Rao, K., Subbakrishna, D. K., et al. (2011). Validation of Social Cognition Rating Tools in Indian Setting (SOCRATIS): a new test-battery to assess social cognition. Asian J. Psychiatr. 4, 203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2011.05.014
Moreau, N., and Champagne-Lavau, M. (2014). Théorie de l'esprit et fonctions exécutives dans la pathologie. Rev. Neuropsychol. 6, 276–281. doi: 10.1684/nrp.2014.0320
Müller, V. I., Cieslik, E. C., Kellermann, T. S., and Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Crossmodal emotional integration in major depression. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 839–848. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst057
Muñoz Ladrón de Guevara, C., Reyes del Paso, G. A., Fernández-Serrano, M. J., and Duschek, S. (2021). Facial emotion recognition and executive functions in fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 22, 1619–1629. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab024
Naranjo, C., Kornreich, C., Campanella, S., Noel, X., Vandriette, Y., Gillain, B., et al. (2011). Major depression is associated with impaired processing of emotion in music as well as in facial and vocal stimuli. J. Affect. Disord. 128, 243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.039
Nejati, V., Zabihzadeh, A., Maleki, G., and Tehranchi, A. (2012). Mind reading and mindfulness deficits in patients with major depression disorder. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 32, 431–437. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.065
Nestor, B. A., Sutherland, S., and Garber, J. (2022). Theory of mind performance in depression: a meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 303, 233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.028
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Olsson, A., and Ochsner, K. N. (2007). The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.010
Pagnoni, I., Gobbi, E., Alaimo, C., Campana, E., Rossi, R., Manenti, R., et al. (2022). The relationship between theory of mind and executive functions in major depressive disorders: a review. Front. Psychiatry 13:980392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.980392
Paulmann, S., Jessen, S., and Kotz, S. A. (2009). Investigating the multimodal nature of human communication. J. Psychophysiol. 23, 63–76. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.23.2.63
Peron, J., El Tamer, S., Grandjean, D., Leray, E., Travers, D., Drapier, D., et al. (2011). Major depressive disorder skews the recognition of emotional prosody. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 987–996. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.01.019
Peterson, C., and Seligman, M. E. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: theory and evidence. Psychol. Rev. 91, 347–374. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.347
Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., and Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 515–528. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00171-9
Pinkham, A. E., Penn, D. L., Green, M. F., Buck, B., Healey, K., Harvey, P. D., et al. (2013). The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: results of the expert survey and RAND panel. Schizophr. Bull. 40, 813–823. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt081
Pizzagalli, D. A., Iosifescu, D., Hallett, L. A., Ratner, K. G., and Fava, M. (2008). Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task. J. Psychiatr. Res. 43, 76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.001
Porcelli, S., Kasper, S., Zohar, J., Souery, D., Montgomery, S., Ferentinos, P., et al. (2019). Social dysfunction in mood disorders and schizophrenia: clinical modulators in four independent samples. Progress Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 99:109835. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109835
Porter-Vignola, E., Booij, L., Dansereau-Laberge, È. M., Garel, P., Chartier, G. B., Seni, A. G., et al. (2022). Social cognition and depression adolescent girls. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 76:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101750
Premack, D., and Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Proudman, D., Greenberg, P., and Nellesen, D. (2021). The growing burden of major depressive disorders (MDD): implications for researchers and policy makers. PharmacoEconomics 39, 619–625. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01040-7
Punkanen, M., Eerola, T., and Erkkila, J. (2011). Biased emotional recognition in depression: perception of emotions in music by depressed patients. J. Affect Disord. 130, 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.034
Raghavendra, P. A., Hegde, S., Philip, M., and Kesavan, M. (2022). Music and neuro-cognitive deficits in depression. Front. Psychol. 13:959169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.959169
Saarikallio, S. (2010). Music as emotional self-regulation throughout adulthood. Psychol. Music 39, 307–327. doi: 10.1177/0305735610374894
Sakka, L. S., and Juslin, P. N. (2017). Emotional reactions to music in depressed individuals. Psychol. Music 46, 862–880. doi: 10.1177/0305735617730425
Saris, I. M. J., Aghajani, M., Van Der Werff, S. J. A., Van Der Wee, N. J. A., and Penninx, B. W. J. H. (2017). Social functioning in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 136, 352–361. doi: 10.1111/acps.12774
Schaefer, K. L., Baumann, J., Rich, B. A., Luckenbaugh, D. A., and Zarate, C. A. Jr. (2010). Perception of facial emotion in adults with bipolar or unipolar depression and controls. J. Psychiatr. Res. 44, 1229–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.024
Schirmer, A., and Adolphs, R. (2017). Emotion perception from face, voice, and touch: comparisons and convergence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 216–228. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.001
Schmid, F., Moreau, F., Benzerouk, F., Raucher-Chéné, D., Kaladjian, A., Gierski, F., et al. (2021). Faux pas recognition and executive processes in patients with alcohol use disorder: toward an investigation of interindividual heterogeneity. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 37, 608–620. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab072
Scibelli, F., Troncone, A., Likforman-Sulem, L., Vinciarelli, A., and Esposito, A. (2016). How major depressive disorder affects the ability to decode multimodal dynamic emotional stimuli. Front. ICT 3:16. doi: 10.3389/fict.2016.00016
Seligman, M. E., Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., and Von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 88:242. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.88.3.242
Sencan, B. (2019). Theory of mind in major depressive disorder. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşimlar 11, 42–54. doi: 10.18863/pgy.383349
Spreng, R. N. (2013). Examining the role of memory in social cognition. Front. Psychol. 4:437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00437
Streiner, D. L., and Norman, G. R. (2011). Correction for multiple testing. CHEST J. 140, 16–18. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0523
Surguladze, S., Brammer, M. J., Keedwell, P., Giampietro, V., Young, A. W., Travis, M. J., et al. (2005). A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.028
Suslow, T., Dannlowski, U., Lalee-Mentzel, J., Donges, U.-S., Arolt, V., Kersting, A., et al. (2004). Spatial processing of facial emotion in patients with unipolar depression: a longitudinal study. J. Affect. Disord. 83, 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.03.003
Takim, U., Sari, S., and Gokcay, H. (2024). The relationship between childhood traumas and social cognition through theory of mind and alexithymia in bipolar disorder. Psychol. Rep. 128, 800–815. doi: 10.1177/00332941241269549
Tang, Q., Huang, Z., Zhou, H., and Ye, P. (2020). Effects of music therapy on depression: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE 15:e0240862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240862
Thaut, M. H. (2010). Neurologic music therapy in cognitive rehabilitation. Music Percept. Interdiscip. J. 27:281. doi: 10.1525/mp.2010.27.4.281
Thoma, P., Zalewski, I., von Reventlow, H. G., Norra, C., Juckel, G., Daum, I., et al. (2011). Cognitive and affective empathy in depression linked to executive control. Psychiatry Res. 189, 373–378. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.030
Trehub, S. (2003). Toward a developmental psychology of music. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 999, 402–413. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.051
Uekermann, J., Abdel-Hamid, M., Lehmkaemper, C., Vollmoeller, W., and Daum, I. (2008). Perception of affective prosody in major depression: a link to executive functions? J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 14, 552–561. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080740
van Tricht, M. J., Smeding, H. M. M., Speelman, J. D., and Schmand, B. A. (2010). Impaired emotion recognition in music in Parkinson's disease. Brain Cogn. 74, 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.005
Van Vleet, T., Stark-Inbar, A., Merzenich, M. M., Jordan, J. T., Wallace, D. L., Lee, M. B., et al. (2019). Biases in processing of mood-congruent facial expressions in depression. Psychiatry Res. 275, 143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.076
Wang, Y.-g., Wang, Y.-q., Chen, S.-l., Zhu, C.-y., and Wang, K. (2008). Theory of mind disability in major depression with or without psychotic symptoms: a componential view. Psychiatry Res. 161, 153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.07.018
Weightman, M. J., Air, T. M., and Baune, B. T. (2014). A review of the role of social cognition in major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry 5:179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00179
Weightman, M. J., Knight, M. J., and Baune, B. T. (2019). A systematic review of the impact of social cognitive deficits on psychosocial functioning in major depressive disorder and opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Psychiatry Res. 274, 195–212. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.035
Wilbertz, G., Brakemeier, E.-L., Zobel, I., Härter, M., and Schramm, E. (2010). Exploring preoperational features in chronic depression. J. Affect. Disord. 124, 262–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.021
Wolkenstein, L., Schönenberg, M., Schirm, E., and Hautzinger, M. (2011). I can see what you feel, but I can't deal with it: impaired theory of mind in depression. J. Affect. Disord. 132, 104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.010
World Health Organization (1993). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yang, C., Zhang, T., Li, Z., Heeramun-Aubeeluck, A., Liu, N., Huang, N., et al. (2015). The relationship between facial emotion recognition and executive functions in first-episode patients with schizophrenia and their siblings. BMC Psychiatry 15, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0618-3
Zobel, I., Werden, D., Linster, H., Dykierek, P., Drieling, T., Berger, M., et al. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in chronically depressed patients. Depress Anxiety 27, 821–828. doi: 10.1002/da.20713
Keywords: social cognition, theory of mind, attribution style, emotion perception, music emotion perception, depression
Citation: Raghavendra PA, Hegde S, Philip M and Muralidharan K (2025) Socio-cognitive processes in mild-moderate depression. Front. Psychol. 16:1541725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541725
Received: 08 December 2024; Accepted: 13 June 2025;
Published: 04 July 2025.
Edited by:
April Hargreaves, National College of Ireland, IrelandReviewed by:
Eva-Flore Msika, Université de Paris, FranceUgŭr Takım, Erzurum Regional Research and Training Hospital, Türkiye
Copyright © 2025 Raghavendra, Hegde, Philip and Muralidharan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shantala Hegde, c2hhbnRhbGEuaGVnZGVAZ21haWwuY29t; c2hlZ2RlQG5pbWhhbnMuYWMuaW4=