ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Eating Behavior
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545056
This article is part of the Research TopicMindful Eating and Mindfulness-Based Practices for Healthier EatingView all 8 articles
Exploring the Interplay Between Mindful Eating and Self-Compassion: Insights from Three Empirical Studies and Future Directions for Research
Provisionally accepted- Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Literature on mindful eating explores both mindful eating behaviour and decision-making for mindful eating jointly, which may not necessarily reflect the accurate nature of what mindful eating truly represents. The present research conducted three studies to explore the relationship between BMI, mindful eating behaviour, decision-making for mindful eating, and selfcompassion. Method and Results: Using 150 participants, Study 1 examined the correlations between the Mindful Eating Behaviour Scale (MEBS), the Sussex-Oxford Compassion for Self-Scale (SOCS), and their subscales with BMI. Significant positive associations were found between BMI and focused eating, as well as focused eating and hunger and satiety (MEBS subscales) and various facets of self-compassion, but the findings were conflicting, suggested by several measurement limitations.Study 2 aimed to address limitations in the measurement of mindful eating by investigating its association with self-compassion using an alternative scale, the Mindful Eating Behaviour Scale -Trait (MEBS-T) using 152 participants. The findings suggested only BMI was negatively associated with recognising suffering and tolerating uncomfortable feelings (SOCS subscales), but no other significant relationships were found. Study 3 further explored the interplay between self-compassion and mindful eating with 235 participants, utilising the MEBS-T and the original Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), revealing significant positive relationships between sensory attention and nonjudgmental awareness (MEBS-T subscales) with common humanity, and mindfulness (alongside nonjudgmental awareness and self-kindness), and significant negative relationships between sensory attention and isolation, and non-judgmental awareness and isolation and over-identification.These findings indicate that associations between mindful eating and self-compassion exist, and specific components of mindful eating, particularly sensory attention and non-judgmental awareness, may play a critical role in fostering a compassionate relationship with oneself -which, for example, in a context of emotional eating and obesity-related stigma propose clear future directions for research and practice but as described in the original Self-Compassion Scale. A critical interpretation of the combined impact and underlying mechanisms in promoting positive eating behaviour change is discussed.
Keywords: mindfulness, Mindful eating, self-compassion, Self-Compassion Scales, Mindful Eating Scales
Received: 13 Dec 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hussain, Keyte, Kalika and Mantzios. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Misba Hussain, Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B4 7BD, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.