Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Cognition

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567735

This article is part of the Research TopicCognitive Mechanisms Underpinning Pro-Social Behavior Across CulturesView all 10 articles

Reward Processing Deficits: Weakened Self-Reward Association in Individuals with Methamphetamine Addiction Undergoing Abstinence

Provisionally accepted
YANGHUI  XIEYANGHUI XIE1,2*CHONG  FANCHONG FAN3*QIANYU  LIQIANYU LI4*
  • 1Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
  • 2Hunan International Economics University, Changsha, Hunan, China
  • 3Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha Shi, Hunan Province, China
  • 4The Ninth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Anhui Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This research primarily investigates whether both reward processing and self-processing are aberrant in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder. It also explores whether initiating self-referential processing modulates reward processing abilities in this population, and how this modulation differs from that observed in healthy controls. Experiment 1 employed a two-factor mixed experimental design to compare the performance of addiction groups with varying withdrawal durations (all participants in the addiction groups were methamphetamine users) against healthy control groups in a probabilistic reward learning task.The results indicated that the healthy control group performed better than the addiction group in learning characters associated with high-probability, high-reward outcomes. While the long-term abstinence group outperformed the short-term abstinence group, these differences were not statistically significant. Therefore, the addiction group subjects in Experiments 2 and 3, the addiction group consisted of methamphetamine users with a uniform withdrawal duration of no more than 12 months . Experiment 2 utilized a two-factor mixed design to explore whether selfprocessing is abnormal in addicted individuals. The results showed that the addiction group had a significantly lower accuracy rate for self-referential characters compared to the healthy control group, while their accuracy for characters associated with acquaintances was significantly higher than that of the healthy control group.Experiment 3 also employed a two-factor mixed design to examine the moderating effect of self-processing on reward learning. The findings revealed that when highprobability reward characters were linked to self-relevance, learning efficiency was superior to that of characters linked to acquaintances. However, this moderating effect was weaker in the addiction group compared to the healthy control group.These results suggest that substance addiction not only impairs individuals' reward processing abilities but also reduces their sensitivity to self-referential information. Furthermore, the enhancing effect of self-processing on reward learning is significantly diminished in addicted populations, providing new insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying addiction.

Keywords: self-processing, reward processing, Addiction, Methamphetamine, Go-Nogo paradigm

Received: 28 Jan 2025; Accepted: 23 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 XIE, FAN and LI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
YANGHUI XIE, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410081, Hunan Province, China
CHONG FAN, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha Shi, 410013, Hunan Province, China
QIANYU LI, The Ninth Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Anhui Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.