ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol., 14 April 2025

Sec. Developmental Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569925

The effectiveness of social-themed picture book reading in promoting children’s prosocial behavior

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Introduction: There is a need for an effective and low-cost approach to promote prosocial behavior in preschool children. This study examines the effectiveness of parent-child shared reading of socially themed picture books on prosocial behavior in preschoolers, and explores the mediating role of empathy.

Methods: Sixty children (aged 4-5 years) and their parents were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which read socially themed picture books, or the control group, which read books on other topics. Shared reading sessions took place twice a week for eight weeks. Prosocial behavior tasks and the Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue) were administered pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Children in the intervention group scored significantly higher on prosocial behavior and empathy than those in the control group. Mediation analysis further revealed that empathy fully mediated the relationship between shared reading of socially themed picture books and prosocial behavior.

Discussion: These findings highlight the role of empathy as a key mechanism through which socially themed picture books promote prosocial behavior. This research provides valuable insights for family education, highlighting a low-cost approach that promotes children’s social development through everyday storytelling without the need for specialized training.

Introduction

Prosocial behaviors are typically defined as voluntary actions intended to benefit others, such as helping, comforting, and sharing (Eisenberg, 2006). Although early childhood is a crucial period for the development of these behaviors (Hay et al., 2004), existing interventions for prosocial behavior primarily focus on adolescents (e.g., Shin and Lee, 2021; Laguna et al., 2023). Research has indicated a strong relationship between prosocial behavior and several aspects of adaptive development, including social acceptance and friendship (Clark and Ladd, 2000; Sebanc, 2003), psychosocial adjustment (Hay and Pawlby, 2003), and academic achievement (Caprara et al., 2000). Additionally, previous research has affirmed that children exhibiting concern and compassion are more likely to grow into compassionate adults (Denham, 1986). Although this association highlights the importance of fostering prosocial skills in children from a young age, most studies in this area either focus on clinical populations (e.g., Crozier and Tincani, 2007; Eden and Oren, 2021), or are part of large-scale programs where prosocial behavior is merely one of the outcome measures (e.g., Flook et al., 2015; Schell et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2020). Additionally, many interventions require interventionists with specialized training (e.g., Leung et al., 2019) or specific settings (e.g., Ornaghi et al., 2015). Therefore, there remains a need to develop an effective approach that can be easily implemented in daily educational settings without requiring professionally trained interventionists and that specifically targets prosocial behavior in non-clinical preschool children.

One effective way to promote prosocial behavior during early childhood may be through reading socially themed picture books. Several experimental studies have validated that reading socially themed picture books has a significant positive impact on the development of prosocial behavior and altruistic giving in preschoolers (Kohm et al., 2016; Larsen et al., 2018). Furthermore, a study has affirmed that the emotional explanations of mothers during parent–child shared reading are positive predictors of prosocial behavior in children during play, whereas emotional comments by mothers during reading negatively correlate with the physical aggression of children (Garner et al., 2008). Socially themed picture books provide more opportunities for parent–child dyads to discuss and comment on emotions, the effect of which may be mediated by increasing the empathy of children.

The present research tested the effectiveness and mechanisms of an intervention based on parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books to promote prosocial behavior of children.

Picture book reading and prosocial behavior

Stories are a powerful tool for socialization, shaping and transmitting moral values across generations (Yao and Enright, 2020). Children’s picture books cover a wide range of themes; however, not all themes may contribute to promoting prosocial behavior in children. The theme of a picture book refers to its central idea or purpose and the major concepts it seeks to convey. Common themes include daily routines, social issues, popular science, and cognitive or creative topics. In particular, socially themed books focus on stories addressing aspects of social life and interpersonal communication, assisting young children explore and comprehend common social interactions through storytelling. These stories typically encompass interpersonal behaviors and the emotional context underlying those behaviors.

Reading picture books with social content has been found to promote prosocial behavior in children. Larsen et al. (2018) found that when experimenters read prosocial storybooks with human characters to children, the children were more likely to share stickers in a follow-up sharing task. Similarly, whether children heard a story in which the main character was rewarded for sharing or one in which the main character faced negative consequences for refusing to share, they were more willing to share candy in the sharing task compared to the control group (Yao and Enright, 2020). Study also found that moral stories featuring internal negative reinforcement, where the main character feels guilty for not sharing, had the strongest effect on promoting children’s sharing behavior (Yu et al., 2024). Previous studies have also found that social-themed picture books are also closely linked to children’s helping behavior. Reading moral stories with a helping theme increased children’s willingness to help (Du and Hao, 2018). Additionally, Kohm et al. (2016) confirmed that children exhibited more helping behaviors and engaged in higher-quality social interactions after being read storybooks with moral lessons and prosocial content. In these short-term experiments, a single reading of picture books significantly increased the children’s subsequent levels of prosocial behavior. Despite the lack of exploration into the underlying mechanisms, the above findings implicitly suggest the possibility of intervening in the development of prosocial behavior in young children through the reading of socially themed picture books.

In this study, we focus on parent–child shared reading as the primary way children engage with social-themed picture books, as it is a cultural routine involving adults and young children worldwide. Research has shown that this interactive parent–child reading format plays a critical role in facilitating children’s social–emotional development (Curenton and Craig, 2011). The frequency of parent–child shared reading significantly predicts higher levels of social functioning (Farver et al., 2006) and theory of mind scores (Lenhart and Richter, 2024). During parent–child shared reading, discussions about social–emotional issues positively predict children’s social understanding and prosocial behavior (Aram et al., 2017). Conversely, children whose parents lack involvement at home, including a low frequency of shared reading, tend to exhibit higher levels of problem behaviors (Fleming et al., 2002). Video-coded observations of parent–child shared reading of social-themed picture books have revealed that most mothers discussed the emotional consequences of wrongdoing, addressing both interpersonal and material moral domains, suggesting that shared reading of social-themed picture books serves as a key avenue for mother–child moral communication (Gomes et al., 2022).

In summary, the current study sought to examine the effectiveness of an intervention involving parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books on prosocial behavior in preschool children. We hypothesized that children in the intervention group would exhibit a significantly greater increase in prosocial behavior after the intervention than children in the control group who read picture books with other themes.

The mediating role of empathy

Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of others and to respond appropriately to their situations (Hoffman, 2000). It is a complex construct that encompasses multiple components. Most researchers agree that empathy includes both cognitive empathy, which encompasses recognizing and understanding the emotions of other individuals, and emotional empathy, which refers to experiencing the emotions of others (Decety and Meyer, 2008). Some researchers have also affirmed that empathy is closely linked to behavioral responses and should be divided into three dimensions, namely, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral empathy (Zhang et al., 2014).

The simulation of social experience theory suggests that simulated experiences generated through literary reading can enhance the empathic experiences of readers, thereby fostering the development of social cognitive abilities (Mar, 2011; Oatley, 2016). For preschool children, picture books are a primary reading material, effectively conveying rich emotions through vivid illustrations and concise text. Immersing in the story context of picture books, children can simulate experiences, which enhances their empathic experiences. Compared with picture books with other themes, socially themed picture books comprise more interpersonal behaviors and the emotional context underlying these behaviors, which can evoke stronger emotional responses. Studies have affirmed that narratives with emotional content can evoke empathy in readers and promote a sense of immersion in reading, thereby activating emotional empathy-related networks, including the anterior insula, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, secondary somatosensory cortex, and inferior frontal gyrus (Hsu et al., 2014).

Socially themed picture books frequently depict the actions, emotions, and psychological states of others, offering parents opportunities to help children understand the causal relationship between emotions and behaviors during storytelling. On the one hand, the act of parent–child reading together increases the frequency of parent–child interactions, which is linked to the development of emotional empathy (Decety and Holvoet, 2021). On the other hand, parents tend to discuss the emotions of others more frequently during shared reading than in everyday conversations (Sabbagh and Callanan, 1998). Conversations about emotional states during storytelling, especially those enriched with emotional lexicon, can enhance the ability of children to understand various aspects of emotions (Grazzani and Ornaghi, 2011), which is crucial for developing cognitive empathy in children (Decety and Holvoet, 2021).

Empathy is vital for the development of prosocial behavior. The Eisenberg proximal social behavior developmental model explains how individuals decide whether to engage in prosocial behaviors through a series of psychological processes, emphasizing that people with high levels of empathy are more attuned to the emotional states of others, which motivates them to help (Eisenberg and Miller, 1987). Numerous studies have confirmed that empathy is associated with prosocial behavior. For instance, Malti et al. (2009) affirmed that empathy measured by various methods (self-reports, teacher reports, and parent reports) was significantly positively correlated with prosocial behavior measured by the same methods. Denham (1986) employed naturalistic observations and individual interviews to demonstrate that emotional cognition can still significantly and independently predict prosocial behavior in 2- to 3-year-old children, even when controlling for gender and grade differences. Current research in affective neuroscience validates that integrating compassion interventions with both affective and cognitive empathy provides the most effective approach to fostering prosocial behavior in individuals (Stevens and Taber, 2021).

Empathy may mediate the relationship between shared reading of socially themed picture books and prosocial behavior. As previously mentioned, this form of shared reading increases the frequency with which parents discuss emotions with their children, thereby fostering the development of children’s empathy—a trait closely linked to prosocial behavior. For instance, a similar study has validated that toddlers whose parents frequently prompt them to reflect on and discuss the emotions depicted in picture books are quicker and more frequent in their helping and sharing behaviors with a needy adult (Brownell et al., 2013).

Based on these insights, we hypothesized that empathy plays a mediating role in the process through which reading socially themed picture books promotes the development of prosocial behavior in children.

Present study

Previous studies have found that reading socially themed picture books can enhance prosocial behavior of children. Nonetheless, there is a lack of intervention studies confirming their long-term effects, and their underlying mechanisms have not been sufficiently explored. We hypothesize that when parents engage in shared reading of socially themed picture books with their children, the children are exposed to rich emotional content and engage in discussions about the emotional states of characters, which is associated with improved empathy. In turn, this empathy further promotes prosocial behavior. Thus, the present research aims to enhance the prosocial behavior of preschool children through parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books and examine the mediating role of empathy in this process. The following hypotheses are proposed:

H1: Children in the intervention group, who read socially themed picture books with their parents, will exhibit a significantly greater increase in prosocial behavior after the intervention compared with children in the control group, who read picture books exploring other themes.

H2: Empathy plays a mediating role between parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books and the prosocial development of children.

Method

Participants

We conducted power analyses using G*Power (Faul et al., 2007) to estimate the expected effects of parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books on prosocial behaviors. The results indicate that given an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.95, a total sample of 54 participants will be required to detect an effect size of η2 = 0.44 when testing the differences between the intervention and control groups, as reported in a similar study (Li et al., 2023).

In a kindergarten located in a southwestern city of China, we recruited 60 middle school children, comprising 32 boys and 28 girls, with an average age of 55.27 ± 3.81 months. Of the participants, 58% were only children, and 85% of the primary caregivers were their parents. The educational qualifications of the parents were relatively high, with 86.6% having completed a bachelor’s degree or higher. Parent–child dyads were assigned at random to the intervention and control groups, with 30 dyads in each group. No significant differences were found in demographic variables, empathy, or prosocial behavior between the intervention and control groups at the pretest (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for all variables by group condition at pretest.

The recruitment period for this study begins on March 4, 2024 and ends on May 30, 2024. Furthermore, the researchers distributed invitations for the picture book shared reading study, with a consent form included on the first page. All parents provided written informed consent prior to the commencement of the study, which was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Materials

Empathy

Empathy questionnaire (EmQue)

We employed the EmQue to measure the empathy abilities of children (Rieffe et al., 2010). This questionnaire was specifically designed for young children and is based on the empathy theories (Hoffman, 2000; De Waal, 2008). It encompasses three dimensions: cognitive, emotional, and behavioral empathy. Chinese scholar translated and adapted the questionnaire for Chinese preschool children and subsequently conducted reliability and validity tests (Yan et al., 2019). The results demonstrated that the revised Chinese version of the EmQue for preschoolers had good reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for measuring empathy in Chinese preschool children. The questionnaire comprises 20 items regarding children’s interactions with their peers. Using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never, 5 = always), parents rated how closely each situation described in the questionnaire aligned with their children’s experiences. The sum of all items was calculated as an overall measure of empathy, with high scores indicating better empathy abilities. In the current study, the internal consistency coefficient of the total score was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.795).

Prosocial behavior

Helping task

Based on the approach employed by Reschke et al. (2023), a child was seated opposite the experimenter, who adhered to a scripted series of actions without offering encouragement or praise during the task. The experimenter “accidentally” knocked a pen holder off the table, causing the pens to scatter on the floor, and then nervously exclaimed, “Oops, my pens fell!” If the child did not offer assistance within 5 s, the experimenter prompted, “Could you help me pick them up?” The experimenter then observed the child’s behavior and scored it based on the following criteria: 2 = the child actively picked up the pens before the experimenter asked for help, 1 = the child picked up the pens after the examiner asked for help, and 0 = the child did not help at all.

Sharing task

Adapted from the dictator game employed by Benenson et al. (2007), the children were seated in front of the experimenter, who presented a collection of stickers and informed them that they could choose their seven favorite stickers as a reward for participating in the game. After they had selected the stickers, the experimenter explained that they would be visiting another kindergarten the next day to play with other children; however, there were not enough stickers to go around. Hence, the children were told they could keep all seven stickers or share some with the children at the other kindergarten. Subsequently, the experimenter provided the children with two envelopes, one with a smiley face, and instructed them to place the stickers they wished to keep in the envelope with the smiley face and any stickers they wanted to share (if any) in the envelope without the smiley face. The experimenter emphasized the anonymity of the children’s decisions and then turned away until the children informed they had finished distributing the stickers. Finally, the experimenter collected the envelope without the smiley face and opened it after the experiment concluded to record the number of stickers shared by them.

The order of the helping and sharing tasks was counterbalanced across subjects. The scores from both tasks were then combined to calculate the total prosocial behavior score.

Intervention materials

Thirty-two picture books were selected by PhD and master’s degree holders with extensive experience in the field of social development of children. All books were chosen from the list of picture books recommended by the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China for children aged 3–6 (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2021). Sixteen of the socially themed picture books focused on four categories: cooperation, sharing, helping, and friendship. The remaining 16 picture books, themed around science, creativity, and daily habits, served as the control group. The books in the control group were comparable to those in the experimental group in terms of length, ratio of illustrations to text and interactive format, but did not include social–emotional content. The original text of the picture books is in Chinese, and their translated titles are listed in Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Picture books list with different themes.

Procedure

Prior to the intervention, the children were assessed on their prosocial behavior using an on-site test, and their parents completed the EmQue. Each group received 16 picture books, with the intervention group receiving socially themed picture books and the control group receiving picture books exploring other themes. The parents and children in both groups were instructed to read two books together per week for 8 weeks. The duration was determined based on previous shared reading interventions that demonstrated significant effects within similar time frames (e.g., Lingwood et al., 2020; Salley et al., 2022). The order in which the books were read was not specified for either group. Each book was read once, with each session lasting 20 to 30 min.

During the intervention, the experimenter monitored the reading progress of both groups through WeChat groups. The parents recorded the reading sessions and submitted weekly reports to the group, with a final report submitted at the end of the eight-week period. The records included information on the chaperone, session duration, questions and interactions that emerged during the session, and session photos. As presented in Table 1, no significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in terms of the frequency of picture book reading per week and duration of each session.

After the intervention ended, the experimenter followed up on the social behavior of the 60 children, and their parents completed the EmQue again.

Analysis

The present research employed SPSS 24.0 for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, difference test analysis, and mediation test. A repeated-measure difference analysis was used to examine the effects of shared reading of picture books with different themes on prosocial behavior of children. Additionally, a mediation model was constructed to explore the mediating role of children’s empathy in the relationship between parent–child socially themed picture book reading and children’s prosocial behavior.

Results

Descriptive statistics

To clearly present the prosocial behavior and empathy scores of the intervention and control groups at the pretest and posttest, we calculated the mean and standard deviation for each group (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Means and standard errors for prosocial behavior and empathy at pretest and posttest for the intervention and control groups.

Intervention effects on preschoolers’ prosocial behavior and empathy

To validate the effect of the intervention on preschool children’s prosocial behavior and empathy, we conducted a repeated-measures ANOVA, with time (pretest or posttest) being a within-subject factor, group condition (intervention or control group) being a between-subjects factor, and children’s gender being a covariate. Prosocial behavior and empathy scores from the pretest and posttest served as the dependent variables, respectively.

For prosocial behavior, the results confirmed that the main effects of group (F = 0.506, p = 0.480) and time (F = 0.020, p = 0.888) were insignificant. The interaction between the group and time was significant (F = 4.633, p = 0.036, df = 55, η2 = 0.077). Children in the intervention group (Mpretest = 2.00 ± 1.01; Mposttest = 2.70 ± 1.23) exhibited a significant increase in prosocial behavior compared with children in the control group (Mpretest = 2.47 ± 1.50; Mposttest = 2.60 ± 1.69) (Figure 1). The results confirmed that reading socially themed picture books significantly promoted children’s prosocial behavior, supporting H1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Changes in prosocial behavior from pretest to posttest in the intervention and control groups.

For empathy, the results confirmed that the main effects of group (F = 0.171, p = 0.680) and time (F = 0.786, p = 0.379) were insignificant. The interaction between the group and time was significant (F = 8.606, p = 0.005, df = 55, η2 = 0.137). Children in the intervention group (Mpretest = 59.03 ± 8.64; Mposttest = 61.30 ± 8.13) showed a significant increase in empathy compared with children in the control group (Mpretest = 56.82 ± 5.94; Mposttest = 56.99 ± 6.03) (Figure 2). The results demonstrated that reading socially themed picture books also significantly enhanced children’s empathy. Building on this finding, we further investigated empathy’s mediating role.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Changes in empathy from pretest to posttest in the intervention and control groups.

Mediation analysis

We used PROCESS 3.4.1 Model 4 to examine whether empathy mediates the relationship between reading socially themed picture books and pro-social development. The independent variable was whether children read socially themed picture books (social themes = 1; other themes = 0). We tested the mediation effect with the change in empathy (pre- and post-test difference) as the mediating variable, and the change in pro-social behavior (pre- and post-test difference) as the dependent variable. The results showed that reading socially themed picture books significantly predicted changes in children’s empathy (b = 0.55, t = 2.90, df = 56, p < 0.01). Additionally, empathy significantly predicted changes in pro-social behavior (b = 0.43, t = 2.33, df = 55, p < 0.05). However, the direct effect of reading socially themed picture books on changes in pro-social behavior was not significant (b = 0.35, t = 0.83, df = 55, p = 0.21) (see Figure 3). Mediation analysis confirmed that the change in empathy fully mediated the relationship between reading socially themed picture books and the change in pro-social behavior (see Table 4).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Complete mediated effect of empathy between intervention and prosocial behavior.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Standardized mediation effects and 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion

Previous research has affirmed that reading socially themed picture books enhances the social cognitive skills of children. Building on these empirical findings, we designed an intervention to enhance the prosocial behavior of children. Additionally, we explored the underlying mechanism of this effect, i.e., whether empathy serves as a mediating factor. We found that parent–child shared reading of picture books with social themes significantly promoted prosocial behavior in children, with empathy playing a complete mediating role.

The current findings underscore the unique contributions of socially themed picture books in promoting prosocial behavior. Storybooks convey psychologically externalized concepts that reflect the ideas, images, understandings, and values prevalent in different social groups. When children engage with these storybooks, they adopt and internalize their ideas and values (Ding et al., 2021). In the present research, the socially themed picture books covered themes of sharing, cooperating, helping, and making friends. From the perspective of Social Learning Theory (Bandura and Walters, 1977), when role models receive positive outcomes for engaging in prosocial behavior or face negative consequences for not doing so, children gain valuable opportunities for observational learning, which in turn enhances their prosocial behavior and guides their social interactions. Besides the content of the picture books, the format of shared reading may also have contributed to the preschoolers’ prosocial behavior, although it was not the independent variable in this study. Qualitative research has also shown that shared reading can be used to convey socioemotional information, with adults using stories to introduce children to prosocial themes and ethical values (Bhavnagri and Samuels, 1996). During shared reading, adults’ reading strategies, such as relating the text or illustrations to children’s personal experiences, asking questions, and encouraging dialogue (Vezzoli et al., 2020), further enhance children’s ability to comprehend social norms.

Future long-term follow-up studies can be conducted to assess whether parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books has a sustained impact on the development of prosocial behavior in children. Additionally, with the advent of digital books and technologies like augmented reality, research can further explore the effectiveness of new technologies in promoting children’s prosocial behavior compared with traditional practices. Finally, we suggest that future interventions prioritize scaffolding shared reading by supporting parents in how to effectively communicate with their children, e.g., using open-ended questions, providing feedback, and being attuned to their child’s evolving abilities (Whitehurst et al., 1988), to achieve optimal intervention outcomes.

We found that empathy plays a mediating role in reading socially themed picture books to promote prosocial behavior. Socially themed picture books often depict interpersonal scenarios that highlight characters’ emotions and internal states (Ding et al., 2021), illustrating the causal relationships between these emotions and subsequent behaviors. For instance, in a picture book focused on helping, a character may show sadness when in need of help and happiness when being helped. Previous research has confirmed that parental discussions about emotions, explaining the antecedents and consequences of emotions, promote young children’s understanding of emotions and internal states, sensitivity to the feelings of others, and awareness of how and when to act on this understanding in a prosocial manner. For instance, mothers’ explanations of emotions have been associated with toddlers’ attempts to understand the emotional state of a distressed person (Garner, 2003) and positively predict children’s prosocial behavior during play (Garner et al., 2008). In contrast, mothers’ emotional comments during reading are negatively associated with children’s physical aggression (Garner et al., 2008). A similar study has confirmed that discussing internal states and prosocial behaviors with children after teachers read prosocial stories to preschoolers significantly increases preschoolers’ empathy and helping and sharing behaviors, whereas children who discuss concrete actions and physical states after reading or do not participate in discussions do not show significant increases in empathy or prosocial behaviors (Brazzelli et al., 2021).

This mechanism can be further explained by the Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis (Dovidio, 1991). This hypothesis suggests that feelings, emotions and empathy drive altruistic motivation. Emotional arousal activates the perception of others’ predicament, which in turn leads to altruistic motivation and promotes prosocial behavior (Persson and Kajonius, 2016). During parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books, children perceive the emotions of story characters and, with parental guidance, get a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of these emotions. This process enhances their empathy. When children empathize with story characters, they are more likely to transfer this feeling to real-life situations, become more sensitive to others’ needs, and engage in more helping and sharing behaviors.

The current research has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the sample may not be fully representative, as it mainly focused on urban kindergarten children, with 86.6% of their parents holding a bachelor’s degree or higher. Caregiver education has been found to be positively associated with positive emotion words, emotion questions, and emotion explanations (Tao et al., 2013). Thus, whether the promotion of prosocial behavior by reading socially themed picture books with parents can be generalized to children of low socioeconomic status must be further investigated. Second, the intervention period was limited to 8 weeks, which, while sufficient for observing short-term effects, may be inadequate for evaluating the long-term impacts of parent–child picture book reading. Moreover, our study design lacked a follow-up phase to test the maintenance of the intervention effects. Finally, although we hypothesized that socially themed picture books would provide parent–child dyads with more opportunities to discuss about emotions and their antecedents and consequences, we did not code parent–child interactions during storytelling in general and conversations about emotions in particular. Future research should explore whether the effects of socially themed picture books on young children’s socioemotional development are mediated by emotional conversations.

In conclusion, we validated the effectiveness of the intervention aimed at developing prosocial behavior in children through parent–child shared reading of socially themed picture books and explored its underlying mechanisms. Our work provides a low-cost, convenient, and effective intervention that does not require specific space or professional training while improving children’s empathy and prosocial behavior simply through the daily activity of parent–child storytelling. The current findings also offer new insights into the role of picture books reading in the social development of children and provide empirical evidence to support the enhancement of family education practices.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

HC: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. DL: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LZ: Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all the children and parents who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Aram, D., Bergman Deitcher, D., Sabag Shoshan, T., and Ziv, M. (2017). Shared book reading interactions within families from low socioeconomic backgrounds and children’s social understanding and prosocial behavior. J. Cogn. Educ. Psychol. 16, 157–177. doi: 10.1891/1945-8959.16.2.157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bandura, A., and Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar

Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., and Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28, 168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhavnagri, N. P., and Samuels, B. G. (1996). Children’s literature and activities promoting social cognition of peer relationships in preschoolers. Early Child Res. Q. 11, 307–331. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90010-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brazzelli, E., Grazzani, I., and Pepe, A. (2021). Promoting prosocial behavior in toddlerhood: a conversation-based intervention at nursery. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 204:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., Anderson, R., Nichols, S. R., and Drummond, J. (2013). Socialization of early prosocial behavior: parents’ talk about emotions is associated with sharing and helping in toddlers. Infancy 18, 91–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00125.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., Bandura, A., and Zimbardo, P. G. (2000). Prosocial foundations of children’s academic achievement. Psychol. Sci. 11, 302–306. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Clark, K. E., and Ladd, G. W. (2000). Connectedness and autonomy support in parent–child relationships: links to children’s socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Dev. Psychol. 36, 485–498. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Crozier, S., and Tincani, M. (2007). Effects of social stories on prosocial behavior of preschool children with autism Spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37, 1803–1814. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0315-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Curenton, S. M., and Craig, M. J. (2011). Shared-reading versus oral storytelling: associations with preschoolers’ prosocial skills and problem behaviours. Early Child Dev. Care 181, 123–146. doi: 10.1080/03004430903292208

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 279–300. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Decety, J., and Holvoet, C. (2021). The emergence of empathy: a developmental neuroscience perspective. Dev. Rev. 62:100999:100999. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2021.100999

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Decety, J., and Meyer, M. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: a social developmental neuroscience account. Dev. Psychopathol. 20, 1053–1080. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Denham, S. A. (1986). Social cognition, prosocial behavior, and emotion in preschoolers: contextual validation. Child Dev. 57, 194–201. doi: 10.2307/1130651

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, R., He, W., and Wang, Q. (2021). A comparative analysis of emotion-related cultural norms in popular American and Chinese storybooks. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 52, 209–226. doi: 10.1177/0022022120988900

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dovidio, J. F. (1991). The empathy- altruism hypothesis: paradigm and promise. Psychol. Inq. 2, 126–128. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0202_4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, X., and Hao, J. (2018). Moral stories emphasizing actors’ negative emotions toward their nonhelping behavior promote preschoolers’ helping behavior. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 168, 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eden, S., and Oren, A. (2021). Computer-mediated intervention to foster prosocial ability among children with autism. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 37, 275–286. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12490

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N. (2006). “Empathy‐Related Responding and Prosocial Behaviour”, in Novartis Foundation Symposia, eds. G. Bock and J. Goode (Chichester, UK: Wiley), 71–88. doi: 10.1002/9780470030585.ch6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N., and Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychol. Bull. 101, 91–119. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Farver, J. A. M., Xu, Y., Eppe, S., and Lonigan, C. J. (2006). Home environments and young Latino children’s school readiness. Early Child Res. Q. 21, 196–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., and Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Oxford, M. L., and Harachi, T. W. (2002). A test of generalizability of the social development model across gender and income groups with longitudinal data from the elementary school developmental period. J. Quant. Criminol. 18, 423–439. doi: 10.1023/A:1021173711746

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., and Davidson, R. J. (2015). Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum. Dev. Psychol. 51, 44–51. doi: 10.1037/a0038256

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Garner, P. W. (2003). Child and family correlates of toddlers’ emotional and behavioral responses to a mishap. Infant Ment. Health J. 24, 580–596. doi: 10.1002/imhj.10076

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Garner, P. W., Dunsmore, J. C., and Southam-Gerrow, M. (2008). Mother–child conversations about emotions: linkages to child aggression and prosocial behavior. Soc. Dev. 17, 259–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00424.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomes, J. R., Da Cruz, S. H., Bauer, A., Arteche, A. X., and Murray, J. (2022). Maternal communication with preschool children about morality: a coding scheme for a book-sharing task. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:11561. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grazzani, I., and Ornaghi, V. (2011). Emotional state talk and emotion understanding: a training study with preschool children. J. Child Lang. 38, 1124–1139. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000772

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hay, D. F., and Pawlby, S. (2003). Prosocial development in relation to children’s and mothers’ psychological problems. Child Dev. 74, 1314–1327. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00609

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hay, D. F., Payne, A., and Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 45, 84–108. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00308.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Hsu, C.-T., Conrad, M., and Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fiction feelings in Harry potter: haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroreport 25, 1356–1361. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000272

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, E., Jackman, M. M., Jo, S.-H., Oh, J., Ko, S.-Y., McPherson, C. L., et al. (2020). Effectiveness of the mindfulness-based OpenMind-Korea (OM-K) preschool program. Mindfulness 11, 1062–1072. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01337-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohm, K. E., Holmes, R. M., Romeo, L., and Koolidge, L. (2016). The connection between shared storybook readings, children’s imagination, social interactions, affect, prosocial behavior, and social play. Int. J. Play 5, 128–140. doi: 10.1080/21594937.2016.1203895

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Laguna, M., Kędra, M., and Mazur-Socha, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of the prosocial goals intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Soc. Psychol. 54, 320–325. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000526

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsen, N. E., Lee, K., and Ganea, P. A. (2018). Do storybooks with anthropomorphized animal characters promote prosocial behaviors in young children? Dev. Sci. 21:e12590. doi: 10.1111/desc.12590

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lenhart, J., and Richter, T. (2024). Media exposure and preschoolers’ social-cognitive development. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 42, 234–256. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12478

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Leung, C., Leung, J., Leung, S., and Karnilowicz, W. (2019). Effectiveness of the whole inclusive school empowerment (WISE) project in supporting preschool children with diverse learning needs. Res. Dev. Disabil. 92:103433. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Deng, T., and Kanske, P. (2023). Affective empathy mediates the positive effect of prosocial video games on young children’s sharing behavior. Cogn. Dev. 67:101343. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101343

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lingwood, J., Billington, J., and Rowland, C. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of a ‘real-world’ shared Reading intervention for preschool children and their families: a randomised controlled trial. J. Res. Read. 43, 249–271. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12301

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., and Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Dev. 80, 442–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01271.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 103–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2021). The Ministry of Education organizes experts to select and recommend a group of children's picture books. Books Young Child. Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202110/t20211027_575342.html (Accessed November 18, 2023).

Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: simulation of social worlds. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 618–628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ornaghi, V., Grazzani, I., Cherubin, E., Conte, E., and Piralli, F. (2015). ‘Let’s talk about emotions!’. The effect of conversational training on preschoolers’ emotion comprehension and prosocial orientation. Soc. Dev. 24, 166–183. doi: 10.1111/sode.12091

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Persson, B. N., and Kajonius, P. J. (2016). Empathy and universal values explicated by the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J. Soc. Psychol. 156, 610–619. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1152212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reschke, P. J., Fraser, A. M., Picket, J., Workman, K., Lehnardt, H., Stockdale, L. A., et al. (2023). Variability in infant helping and sharing behaviors across the second and third years of life: differential roles of target and socialization. Dev. Psychol. 59, 524–537. doi: 10.1037/dev0001441

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieffe, C., Ketelaar, L., and Wiefferink, C. H. (2010). Assessing empathy in young children: construction and validation of an empathy questionnaire (EmQue). Personal. Individ. Differ. 49, 362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.046

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabbagh, M. A., and Callanan, M. A. (1998). Metarepresentation in action: 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds’ developing theories of mind in parent–child conversations. Dev. Psychol. 34, 491–502. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.34.3.491

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Salley, B., Daniels, D., Walker, C., and Fleming, K. (2022). Shared book Reading intervention for parents of infants and toddlers. J. Early Child. Res. 20, 322–340. doi: 10.1177/1476718x221091462

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schell, A., Albers, L., Kries, R. V., Hillenbrand, C., and Hennemann, T. (2015). Preventing behavioral disorders via supporting social and emotional competence at preschool age. Dtsch. Ärztebl. Int. 112, 647–654. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0647

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Soc. Dev. 12, 249–268. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00232

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, J., and Lee, B. (2021). The effects of adolescent prosocial behavior interventions: a meta-analytic review. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 22, 565–577. doi: 10.1007/s12564-021-09691-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevens, F., and Taber, K. (2021). The neuroscience of empathy and compassion in pro-social behavior. Neuropsychologia 159:107925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107925

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tao, A., Zhou, Q., Lau, N., and Liu, H. (2013). Chinese American immigrant mothers’ discussion of emotion with children: relations to cultural orientations. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 44, 478–501. doi: 10.1177/0022022112453318

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vezzoli, Y., Kalantari, S., Kucirkova, N., and Vasalou, A. (2020). Exploring the design space for parent-child Reading, In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, (Honolulu HI USA: ACM).

Google Scholar

Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., et al. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Dev. Psychol. 24, 552–559. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.552

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Liu, Y., Pei, M., and Su, Y. (2019). Revision and validation of the empathy questionnaire. Psychol. Tech. Appl. 7, 514–522. doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.09.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, Z., and Enright, R. (2020). The influence of moral stories on kindergarteners’ sharing behaviour. Early Child Dev. Care 190, 891–901. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1499098

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H., Gai, X., Chen, X., Xu, J., and Zhang, P. (2024). Moral stories reading with internal negative reinforcement enhance children’s sharing behavior. J. Moral Educ. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2024.2411960

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Lui, S. S., Cheung, E. F., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H., et al. (2014). Validation of the Griffith empathy measure in the Chinese context. Brain Impair. 15, 10–17. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2014.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: shared reading, prosocial behavior, empathy, preschool children, picture books

Citation: Chen H, Lyu D and Zhu L (2025) The effectiveness of social-themed picture book reading in promoting children’s prosocial behavior. Front. Psychol. 16:1569925. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569925

Received: 21 February 2025; Accepted: 26 March 2025;
Published: 14 April 2025.

Edited by:

Matteo Angelo Fabris, University of Turin, Italy

Reviewed by:

Charyna Ayu Rizkyanti, Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Indonesia
Theresia Julius Shavega, The Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania
Mallevi Ningrum, Surabaya State University, Indonesia

Copyright © 2025 Chen, Lyu and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Liqi Zhu, emh1bHFAcHN5Y2guYWMuY24=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.