Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572220

Beyond the Bipolar: Allowing Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction to Coexist

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Psychology, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
  • 2Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States
  • 3Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This paper advances a separable, multi-dimensional account of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, proposing that they are distinct constructs that can coexist, particularly in contexts involving ambivalence and indifference. When we specify measurement, we operationalize this account with bivariate unipolar items (separate single-ended scales for both satisfaction and dissatisfaction) rather than a single unidimensional bipolar continuum. Drawing upon theories from psychology—including Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, Watson and Tellegen's Circumplex Model of Affect, Cacioppo's Evaluative Space Model, and Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory—we argue that positive and negative emotions are processed separately in the human mind, allowing for the simultaneous experience of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, rather than placing them on two ends of a single bipolar spectrum. By reviewing evidence from psychological sciences, information science, human-computer interaction, and other disciplines, we highlight the limitations of bipolar scales in capturing the complexity of human emotional states and the full range of human experience. We review qualitative and empirical evidence demonstrating that satisfaction and dissatisfaction arise from different factors and have unique influences on behavior and decision-making. Recognizing them as separate constructs allows for more accurate measurement and better understanding of phenomena involving ambivalence and indifference. We offer practical guidance for researchers on when to use bivariate unipolar versus bipolar scales, how to identify contextual factors contributing to satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and how to design measurement tools that capture the nuances of these constructs. Through this narrative literature review, we embrace the idea that a separable, multidimensional perspective facilitates a more complete understanding of human emotions, motivations, and behaviors, leading to deeper insights and more effective strategies.

Keywords: Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, ambivalence, Indifference, bivariate unipolar items, Bipolar scales

Received: 06 Feb 2025; Accepted: 31 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Souders and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dustin Joshua Souders, Department of Psychology, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, United States
Yixiu Yu, Ball State University, Muncie, 47306, Indiana, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.