ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761

This article is part of the Research TopicOptimizing the Therapeutic Potential in Clinical Settings: Leveraging Placebos and Mitigating Nocebo EffectsView all 7 articles

Open-Label-Placebos can reduce pain, but not indigestion during gluten challenge in chronic pain patients

Provisionally accepted
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Dietary interventions have become a management tool for chronic pain conditions. Certain diets, such as gluten-free diets, are perceived as particularly beneficial by patients, although there is no evidence to support this. Studies that have investigated this topic have focused little on expectation effects that could be involved in symptom development or pain increase. In a 2x2 study design with repeated measurements, we investigated 26 fibromyalgia patients (FMS). Additional chronic pain conditions were included and analyzed exploratively. Participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with double-blinded gluten or alleged gluten (sham gluten). All of them received an OLP with different instructions to treat negative effects of the porridge. Treatment expectations were modulated by either neutral or positive instructions regarding the OLPs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) gluten and neutral instructions; (2) gluten and positive instructions; (3) sham gluten and neutral instructions; and (4) sham gluten and positive instructions. Expectations before (T0) and after the instructions (T0.1) as well as pain and indigestion before (T0) and after OFC (T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min) were assessed.In FMS patients, a significant interaction with instructions were observed (p=0.048). Positive instructions led to a decrease in pain (T0-T2) while neutral instructions led to an increase in pain. However, post-hoc comparisons did not reveal significant group differences. No interaction was found with gluten (p=0.65). Positive instructions increased positive treatment expectations but missed significance marginally (p = .06), while negative expectations decreased for all participants (p < .001). A strong correlation was found between expected and actual pain relief (p < .001).Digestive discomfort increased temporarily post-intervention (p < .004). No significant effects of gluten (p = 0.15) or instructions (p = 0.8) on indigestion were observed. This study highlights the role of expectations in chronic pain conditions during gluten provocation. While gluten itself showed no significant impact on pain or indigestion, positive instructions enhanced perceived pain relief. These findings suggest that expectation effects may play a more central role in symptom modulation. Future research should focus on expectation-driven mechanisms to better understand and optimize dietary interventions in chronic pain management.

Keywords: Gluten intolerance1, chronic pain2, expectation3, open-label-placebo4, Fibromyalgia5

Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 01 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Paschke-Dahl and Klinger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lena Paschke-Dahl, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.