Antonio Onofri
Michael Hase- 1School of Specialization in Psychotherapy “Training School”, Rome, Italy
- 2EMDR Center, Luneburg, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Present and future of EMDR in clinical psychology and psychotherapy, volume III
In the evolving landscape of mental health treatment, Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy continues to stand out as one of the most transformative therapeutic approaches. Building on the foundations laid in the previous two volumes (Castelnuovo et al., 2019; Onofri, 2023), this third installment of Present and Future of EMDR in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy advances both theoretical understanding and clinical applications of EMDR therapy, expanding its scope beyond traditional trauma treatment.
Volume I, published in 2017, introduced a wide array of clinical evidence, showcasing EMDR therapy's effectiveness across conditions such as PTSD (Yurtsever et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2018; Moreno-Alcázar et al., 2017), panic (Horst et al., 2017), depression (Hase et al., 2018; Ostacoli et al., 2018), somatic disorders (Szpringer et al., 2018) and other conditions (Carletto et al., 2018; Valiente-Gómez et al., 2017).
Volume II, released in 2023, highlighted EMDR therapy's adaptability also during the COVID-19 pandemic and its integration with other therapeutic modalities (Lazzaroni et al., 2021, 2022; Faretta et al., 2022; Yurtsever et al., 2022; Fernandez et al., 2022; Farrell et al., 2022). Together, these works have underscored the sustained growth and innovative evolution of EMDR.
This third volume reflects a further understanding of EMDR therapy's mechanisms, emphasizing its flexibility and broad applicability.
As we introduce the third volume of Present and Future of EMDR in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, we continue to witness significant advancements in the application and understanding of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. In recent years, research has proliferated, demonstrating the efficacy of EMDR therapy in addressing trauma (Wright et al., 2024; Torres-Giménez et al., 2024; Matthijssen et al., 2024), panic (Inci Izmir et al., 2024), eating disorders (Rossi et al., 2024), mood disorders (Seok and Kim, 2024), psychosis (Varese et al., 2024; Marlow et al., 2024; Every-Palmer et al., 2024; Strelchuk et al., 2024), chronic pain (Vock et al.), and various other psychological conditions (Rodríguez-Garay and Mosquera, 2022; Martínez-Fernández et al., 2024; Schipper-Eindhoven et al., 2024; Zat Çiftçi et al., 2024; Stingl et al., 2024; Bal and Kiriş, 2024; Hafkemeijer et al., 2024). This volume reflects the ongoing commitment of the EMDR community to explore new clinical areas and expand our understanding of its therapeutic potential.
While previous volumes have made substantial contributions validating the effectiveness of EMDR therapy and uncovering its underlying mechanisms (Landin-Romero et al., 2018; Pagani et al., 2017; Matthijssen et al., 2017; Hase et al., 2017), it is becoming increasingly important that future research also turns its focus toward the therapeutic process itself (Ramallo-Machin et al.). Understanding how EMDR unfolds in real-time within the therapeutic relationship (Hase and Brisch, 2022), and what factors contribute to its success beyond mechanistic or outcome-driven research, could illuminate pathways to more individualized and effective interventions. In addition this volume reflects the development of the EMDR technique to the comprehensive psychotherapy which EMDR therapy is.
The articles included in this volume mark a decisive step forward in this direction.
More than one contribution, for example, emphasize the importance of therapist-patient attunement, the nuances of countertransference, and the role of emotional resonance during sessions (Ramallo-Machin et al.; Hase et al.). These elements remind us that EMDR is not merely a technique applied in isolation but part of a dynamic interaction where the relational and emotional context is critical, as it is EMDR therapy.
Looking ahead, we must encourage future research to delve deeper into these relational processes. By studying not only what makes EMDR therapy effective but how it works within the therapeutic alliance, we will be better positioned to refine our approaches and enhance the quality of care. A broader inquiry into the therapist's emotional regulation, sensitivity to patient cues, and the co-creation of a safe therapeutic space could offer invaluable insights.
Additionally, while the drive to reveal the neurobiological mechanisms of EMDR therapy has so far provided essential data, the complexity of the therapeutic process cannot be fully captured by brain scans or quantitative measures alone. We must balance the quest for scientific validation with a richer understanding of the lived experiences of both patients and therapists within the EMDR therapy framework. Future studies should aim to include qualitative methods that explore the subjective, emotional, and interpersonal dimensions of EMDR therapy, thus complementing the current focus on empirical outcomes.
This volume surely underscores the continuing evolution of EMDR therapy as a clinical tool, and it is an honor to present the contributions of distinguished researchers and practitioners. As we look toward the future, let us prioritize not only the technical refinement of EMDR therapy but also a deeper exploration of the relational and emotional processes that make it such a profoundly transformative therapy.
Acknowledging EMDR Europe's role in advancing research
Before delving into the key contributions of this volume, we wish to recognize the critical role that EMDR Europe has played in fostering research and clinical excellence. Their continuous commitment to advancing empirical research has driven significant progress in the development of EMDR therapy treatment plans, often referred to as protocols. Many recent research owe much to their support, which has fortified the scientific underpinnings of EMDR therapy, securing its position as an evidence-based approach to trauma and beyond.
Rapid growth of EMDR research
The body of research surrounding EMDR therapy is growing rapidly, with a notable shift in geographical focus. While the United States has historically been the center of EMDR therapy research in the beginning, Europe has emerged as a significant contributor. Countries such as the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, Italy, and Germany are leading the way, advancing the field through robust research initiatives. Moreover, emerging states are beginning to explore and implement EMDR therapy, signaling a broader international interest and EMDR therapy's expanding reach.
Key contributions of volume III
This volume features a range of contributions that deepen our understanding of EMDR therapy's applications. The articles exemplify the versatility and impact of EMDR therapy, from its integration with attachment theory to novel applications in pediatric oncology. A brief overview of the four main articles in this volume follows:
1. The Therapeutic Relationship in EMDR Therapy - A survey (Hase et al. 2024): This study revisits the foundations of EMDR therapy's development, particularly the evolution of the Adaptive Information Processing (AIP) model, and explores the role of the therapeutic relationship within an attachment framework. Based on a modified Delphi method, the study gathered insights from EMDR therapists to assess the attachment-based concept of the therapeutic relationship in EMDR therapy. Results support this perspective, highlighting the importance of the therapeutic bond, and suggesting implications for training and clinical application.
2. Apples and Oranges: Comparing PTSD Patients and Healthy Individuals in Bilateral Stimulation Responses (Pape et al. 2024): This study investigates physiological and subjective responses to bilateral stimulation (BLS) among PTSD patients compared to healthy individuals. Findings indicate distinct differences: while healthy individuals displayed reduced distress and enhanced attention under BLS, PTSD patients showed subjective relief without corresponding physiological changes. These results caution against assuming that BLS responses in healthy populations are directly transferable to clinical PTSD contexts.
3. Factors Influencing Quality of Processing in EMDR Therapy (Ramallo Machin et al. 2024): This article introduces the Processing Difficulties Scale (PDS), developed to identify and address in-session processing challenges specific to EMDR therapy. The study highlights the impact of complex trauma, dissociative symptoms, and emotional dysregulation on processing effectiveness, particularly in clients with early traumatization. This new scale offers a promising tool for optimizing therapeutic outcomes by tailoring interventions to address processing styles and challenges effectively.
4. EMDR in Pediatric Psychology: A Case Report of an Adolescent with Cancer (Zucchetti et al. 2024): A groundbreaking case study explores the application of EMDR therapy in treating PTSD symptoms in a 17-year-old cancer patient, a novel approach in pediatric oncology. The case demonstrates the EMDR therapy protocol's effectiveness in reducing emotional distress related to a leukemia diagnosis, supporting its potential as an early intervention in pediatric oncology settings.
Looking toward the future: EMDR therapy's expanding frontiers
As this third volume reveals, the future of EMDR therapy continues to unfold in promising directions. Innovations such as the Processing Difficulties Scale offer new insights into optimizing EMDR therapy sessions, particularly for complex trauma cases. With growing interest in integrating EMDR therapy with cutting-edge technologies, there is immense potential to create more immersive therapeutic experiences. Additionally, emerging research suggests EMDR therapy's applicability for somatic conditions like chronic pain, representing a new frontier in mind-body approaches.
Conclusion
The research compiled in Present and Future of EMDR in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Volume III reflects the ongoing growth and innovation within EMDR therapy. Building on the solid foundations of Volumes I and II, this volume brings fresh perspectives and expands the evidence base for EMDR therapy's use in diverse settings and populations. Thanks to EMDR Europe's steadfast support in the field of research, the field is moving toward higher scientific rigor and broader accessibility, ensuring that EMDR therapy will continue to play a vital role in trauma-informed care and in psychotherapy in general worldwide for years to come.
Author contributions
AO: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. AI has been used for the initial translation from Italian into English of the manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bal, F., and Kiriş, M. (2024). Effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing-EMDR method in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus. Brain Sci. 14:918. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090918
Carletto, S., Oliva, F., Barnato, M., Antonelli, T., Cardia, A., Mazzaferro, P., et al. (2018). EMDR as add-on treatment for psychiatric and traumatic symptoms in patients with substance use disorder. Front. Psychol. 8:2333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02333
Castelnuovo, G., Fernandez, I., and Amann, B. L. (2019). Present and future of EMDR in clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Front. Psychol. 10:2185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02185
Every-Palmer, S., Flewett, T., Dean, S., Hansby, O., Freeland, A., Weatherall, M., et al. (2024). “Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy compared to usual treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with psychosis in forensic settings: Randomized controlled trial,” in Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (Washington, DC: APA PsycNet, American Psychologists Association).
Faretta, E., Maslovaric, G., Garau, M. I., Marmondi, G., Piras, L., Rezzola, S., et al. (2022). The psychological impact of the COVID emergency on Italian nursing homes staff and the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Front. Psychol. 13:969028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.969028
Farrell, D., Fadeeva, A., Zat, Z., Knibbs, L., Miller, P., Barron, I., et al. (2022). A stage 1 pilot cohort exploring the use of EMDR therapy as a videoconference psychotherapy during COVID-19 with frontline mental health workers: a proof of concept study utilising a virtual blind 2 therapist protocol. Front. Psychol. 13:901855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901855
Fernandez, I., Pagani, M., and Gallina, E. (2022). Post-traumatic stress disorder among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: effectiveness of an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing intervention protocol. Front. Psychol. 13:964334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964334
Hafkemeijer, L., de Jongh, A., Starrenburg, A., Hoekstra, T., and Slotema, K. (2024). EMDR treatment in patients with personality disorders. Should we fear symptom exacerbation? Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 15:2407222. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2407222
Hase, M., and Brisch, K. H. (2022). The therapeutic relationship in EMDR therapy. Front. Psychol. 13:835470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835470
Hase, M., Balmaceda, U. M., Ostacoli, L., Liebermann, P., and Hofmann, A. (2017). The AIP model of EMDR therapy and pathogenic memories. Front. Psychol. 8:1578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01578
Hase, M., Plagge, J., Hase, A., Braas, R., Ostacoli, L., Hofmann, A., et al. (2018). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing versus treatment as usual in the treatment of depression: A randomized-controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 9:1384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01384
Horst, F., Den Oudsten, B., Zijlstra, W., de Jongh, A., Lobbestael, J., and De Vries, J. (2017). Cognitive behavioral therapy vs. eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for treating panic disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 8:278739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01409
Inci Izmir, S. B., Korkmazlar, Ü., and Ercan, E. S. (2024). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy in adolescents with panic disorder: a twelve-week follow-up study. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 29, 966–981. doi: 10.1177/13591045231184757
Landin-Romero, R., Moreno-Alcazar, A., Pagani, M., and Amann, B. L. (2018). How does eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy work? A systematic review on suggested mechanisms of action. Front. Psychol. 9:1395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01395
Lazzaroni, E., Invernizzi, R., Fogliato, E., Pagani, M., and Maslovaric, G. (2021). Coronavirus disease 2019 emergency and remote eye movement desensitization and reprocessing group therapy with adolescents and young adults: overcoming lockdown with the butterfly hug. Front. Psychol. 12:701381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701381
Lazzaroni, E., Tosi, D., Pontiggia, S., Ermolli, R., Borghesi, L., Rigamonti, V., et al. (2022). Early psychological intervention in adult patients after hospitalization during COVID-19 pandemia. A single center observational study. Front. Psychol. 13:1059134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059134
Marlow, S., Laugharne, R., Allard, J., Bassett, P., Priebe, S., Ledger, J., et al. (2024). A pragmatic randomized controlled exploratory trial of the effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy for psychotic disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 169, 257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.11.024
Martínez-Fernández, D. E., Fernández-Quezada, D., Garzón-Partida, A. P., Aguilar-García, I. G., García-Estrada, J., and Luquin, S. (2024). The effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy on reducing craving in populations with substance use disorder: a meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 14:1110. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14111110
Matthijssen, S. J., Brouwers, T. C., and de Jongh, A. (2024). Visual schema displacement therapy versus eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy versus waitlist in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: results of a randomized clinical trial. Front. Psychiatry 15:1377108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377108
Matthijssen, S. J., Verhoeven, L. C., Van den Hout, M. A., and Heitland, I. (2017). Auditory and visual memories in PTSD patients targeted with eye movements and counting: the effect of modality-specific loading of working memory. Front. Psychol. 8:1937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01937
Moreno-Alcázar, A., Treen, D., Valiente-Gómez, A., Sio-Eroles, A., Perez, V., Amann, B. L., et al. (2017). Efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in children and adolescent with post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Psychol. 8:1750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01750
Onofri, A. (2023). Present and future of EMDR in clinical psychology and psychotherapy, volume II. Front. Psychol. 14:1138153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1138153
Ostacoli, L., Carletto, S., Cavallo, M., Baldomir-Gago, P., Di Lorenzo, G., Fernandez, I., et al. (2018). Comparison of eye movement desensitization reprocessing and cognitive behavioral therapy as adjunctive treatments for recurrent depression: the European Depression EMDR Network (EDEN) randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 9:74. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00074
Pagani, M., Amann, B. L., Landin-Romero, R., and Carletto, S. (2017). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and slow wave sleep: a putative mechanism of action. Front. Psychol. 8:1935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01935
Rodríguez-Garay, A., and Mosquera, D. (2022). Using EMDR to treat intimate partner relationship break-up issues. Front. Psychol. 13:971856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971856
Rossi, E., Cassioli, E., Cecci, L., Arganini, F., Martelli, M., Redaelli, C. A., et al. (2024). Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing as add-on treatment to enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy for patients with anorexia nervosa reporting childhood maltreatment: a quasi-experimental multicenter study. Eur. Eating Disord. Rev. 32, 322–337. doi: 10.1002/erv.3044
Schipper-Eindhoven, S. M., de Knegt, N. C., Mevissen, L., van Loon, J., de Vries, R., Zhuniq, M., et al. (2024). EMDR treatment for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review about difficulties and adaptations. Front. Psychiatry 14:1328310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1328310
Seok, J. W., and Kim, J. I. (2024). The efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment for depression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. J. Clin. Med. 13:5633. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185633
Stingl, M., Hemmerde, M., Drutschmann, E., Pape, V., and Hanewald, B. (2024). “The use of the “group traumatic episode protocol (G-TEP)” in an outpatient randomized and hospital setting: Implementation and effects in heterogeneous patient samples,” in Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (Washington, DC: APA PsycNet, American Psychologists Association).
Strelchuk, D., Wiles, N., Turner, K., Derrick, C., Martin, D., Davies, J., et al. (2024). Eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy (EMDR) to prevent transition to psychosis in people with an at-risk mental state (ARMS): mixed method feasibility study. BJPsych Open 10:e105. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.57
Szpringer, M., Oledzka, M., and Amann, B. L. (2018). A non-randomized controlled trial of EMDR on affective symptoms in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Front. Psychol. 9:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00785
Torres-Giménez, A., Garcia-Gibert, C., Gelabert, E., Mallorquí, A., Segu, X., Roca-Lecumberri, A., et al. (2024). Efficacy of EMDR for early intervention after a traumatic event: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychiat. Res. 174, 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.019
Valiente-Gómez, A., Moreno-Alcázar, A., Treen, D., Cedrón, C., Colom, F., Pérez, V., et al. (2017). EMDR beyond PTSD: a systematic literature review. Front. Psychol. 8:1668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01668
Varese, F., Sellwood, W., Pulford, D., Awenat, Y., Bird, L., Bhutani, G., et al. (2024). Trauma-focused therapy in early psychosis: results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial of EMDR for psychosis (EMDRp) in early intervention settings. Psychol. Med. 54, 874–885. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002532
Wilson, G., Farrell, D., Barron, I., Hutchins, J., Whybrow, D., and Kiernan, M. D. (2018). The use of eye-movement desensitization reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in treating post-traumatic stress disorder—a systematic narrative review. Front. Psychol. 9:923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00923
Wright, S. L., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P., Bisson, J., Papola, D., Witteveen, A., et al. (2024). EMDR v. other psychological therapies for PTSD: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 54, 1580–1588. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003446
Yurtsever, A., Bakalim, O., Karaman, S., Kaya, S., and Konuk, E. (2022). The effect of the online eye movement desensitization and reprocessing early intervention protocol (EMDR R-TEP) for the risk groups with post-traumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 13:935782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935782
Yurtsever, A., Konuk, E., Akyüz, T., Zat, Z., Tükel, F., Çetinkaya, M., et al. (2018). An eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) group intervention for Syrian refugees with post-traumatic stress symptoms: results of a randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 9:493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00493
Keywords: EMDR, psychotherapy, therapeutic process, PTSD, therapeutic relationship
Citation: Onofri A and Hase M (2025) Editorial: Present and future of EMDR in clinical psychology and psychotherapy, volume III. Front. Psychol. 16:1581456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1581456
Received: 22 February 2025; Accepted: 21 April 2025;
Published: 14 May 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: Nuno Conceicao, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Copyright © 2025 Onofri and Hase. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Antonio Onofri, ZG90dG9yb25vZnJpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Michael Hase, bWljaGFlbEBlbWRyLWNlbnRlci5jb20=