Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1583349

This article is part of the Research Topic40 Years of Relative Age Effects in Sport: Lessons from the Past and Directions for the FutureView all 22 articles

RELATIVE AGE EFFECTS AND PLAYER PATHWAYS IN INTERNATIONAL ICE HOCKEY: A LONGITUDINAL MULTI-COHORT ANALYSIS

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
  • 2Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Hockey, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
  • 3Département des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
  • 4Department of Sport and Social Sciences, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Past research shows that relative age effects (RAEs) are highly prevalent in ice hockey.Early-born players benefit from more exposure, especially in the early stages of development, and are frequently considered "more talented." Although RAEs are apparent in these early stages, little is known about how it affects pathways leading to the highest levels of competition. This study aims to look more closely at the associations between RAEs and players' career trajectories in 4 hockey nations: Canada, Finland, Czechia, and Slovakia. Specifically, it aims to: 1) evaluate the prevalence of RAEs in each country, 2) identify players' career pathways and examine the impact of RAEs on the players, and 3) compare these effects for each nation. Data were drawn from 4,306 players (100% males born between 1992 and 2002), who were invited to national development and selection camps between 2009 and 2019. Trajectory clusters were estimated from the players' participation in 8 career milestones, from U17 to representation of their country at the Olympic Games. Group comparisons were conducted based on birth quartiles and hockey nations. The results confirmed the presence of RAEs in the four hockey nations. Consistent with past research, early-born players are overrepresented in the early career stage, whereas late-born players begin to emerge during transition to junior level (U20). Some nationspecific differences were observed. This provides further support for the stakeholders of ice hockey association looking to enhance their national team selection processes and discover structuring pathways that offer development opportunities for all groups of players.

Keywords: birth advantage, Ice hockey, talent selection, long term athletic development, Competitive Sport

Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lemoyne, Bespomoschchnov and Saarinen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jean Lemoyne, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
Mika Saarinen, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, 00520, Uusimaa, Finland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.