ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Pediatric Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588422

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Rights and Needs of Children During Times of War and ConflictView all articles

Early Psychological Responses of Children and Caregivers in the Immediate Aftermath of Release from War Captivity

Provisionally accepted
Maya  FennigMaya Fennig1*Avigal  SnirAvigal Snir2,3Maayan  ShorerMaayan Shorer2,4Efrat  Bron HarelEfrat Bron Harel1,2Silvana  FennigSilvana Fennig1,2
  • 1Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 2Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
  • 3Academic College Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 4Ruppin Academic Center, Hadera, Israel

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Captivity-particularly the captivity of children-is one of the most extreme violations of civilian rights in armed conflict. Despite this, most research on war captivity has focused on adult soldiers, leaving largely unexplored the unique psychological reactions of children subjected to such trauma.Objective: This study aims to (1) describe the early psychological responses of children and caregivers' early psychological responses immediately following their release from captivity in the Israeli-Hamas war and (2) examine the clinical interventions used to manage these reactions.Methods: This qualitative study analyzed the psychological reactions of children and their caregivers (N=26) who were released from captivity and received care at {masked}. Data collection methods included a review of medical files and in-depth interviews with practitioners (n=37), including social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists, nurses, and pediatricians, who provided health-and psychosocial care.Results: Psychological responses were influenced by developmental stage and captivity context. Among young children (2-11 years), predominant reactions included excessive worry, repetitive questioning, traumatic reenactment (e.g., through play), separation anxiety, hypervigilance, anger outbursts, low frustration tolerance, and sleep disturbances. Adolescents (12-18 years) primarily exhibited avoidance, hyperarousal, sleep disturbances, and excessive sharing of traumatic experiences. Caregivers (19-80 years) displayed reactions similar to those of adolescents but also demonstrated dissociative reactions. Interventions were based on the principles of the Psychological First Aid (PFA) model and tailored to the specific reactions of children and caregivers.Conclusions: This study is the first to provide qualitative data on the psychological responses of children and caregivers following war captivity. The findings highlight the need for a family-oriented approach to mental health interventions, particularly for supporting young children and their caregivers. Training practitioners to recognize developmentally specific reactions in the immediate aftermath of captivity is critical for effective assessment, care, and psychopathology prevention. The study concludes with recommendations for improving practice and policy to address this severe and complex violation of children's rights.

Keywords: Children, Trauma, War, Israel, conflict, Mental Health, adol escents, psychological interveniton

Received: 05 Mar 2025; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fennig, Snir, Shorer, Bron Harel and Fennig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maya Fennig, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.