Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Human Developmental Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1589113

This article is part of the Research TopicChildren's Health and Screen TimeView all 20 articles

Screen exposure in Chilean children during early childhood and socio-emotional problems: relationship and directionality

Provisionally accepted
Pamela  Soto-RamirezPamela Soto-Ramirez1*Felipe  GodoyFelipe Godoy1Marigen  NareaMarigen Narea1,2Camila  AyalaCamila Ayala1
  • 1Centro de Justicia Educacional, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • 2Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Research has found a correlation between screen exposure in early childhood and children's socio-emotional development, particularly in Global North countries. However, the direction of the effect has not been extensively studied in early childhood, especially in Global South contexts. This study aims to describe the relationship and the bidirectional longitudinal associations between screen exposure and children's internalizing and externalizing problems among children in Chile. Methods: Using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), 669 Chilean children were measured two times over a two-year period: in 2021 (T1; mean age = 3.5 years) and 2023 (T2; mean age = 5.4 years). Linear regression analyses were employed to examine the relationship between screen exposure and internalizing and externalizing problems at T1 and T2 separately. A cross-lagged panel model (CLMP) was used to analyze the bidirectional longitudinal association between time of screen exposure and internalizing and externalizing problems. Results: A higher screen time exposure was significantly associated with the presence of internalizing and externalizing problems in children at T1 (3 years) (β = .62, SE = .29, p = .031; β = .79, SE = .25, p = .002). However, the association at T2 (5 years) was significant only for externalizing problems (β = .46, SE = .24, p = .054). The cross-lagged analysis revealed that externalizing problems at T1 significantly predicted higher screen time exposure at T2 (β = .08, SE = .04, p = .043), whereas higher screen time exposure at T1 did not significantly predict externalizing problems at T2 (β = -.01, SE = .03, p = .71). No significant association in the cross-lagged analysis was identified for internalizing problems. Conclusion: The results suggest an association between increased screen time and the development of internalizing and externalizing problems in Chilean children. Specifically, the results suggest that children who exhibit high levels of externalizing problems at a young age are more likely to spend more time on screens at an older age. This could be a form of coping mechanism, a result of parental behavior management strategies.

Keywords: Internalizing problems, Externalizing problems, screen time exposure, Cross-lagged models, young children

Received: 06 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Soto-Ramirez, Godoy, Narea and Ayala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Pamela Soto-Ramirez, Centro de Justicia Educacional, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.