ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Performance Science
Reliability of judging in Olympic breaking at the 2024 Paris Games
Provisionally accepted- Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction: Although breakdancing was adopted as an Olympic sport at the 2024 Paris Olympics, difficulty of techniques and objective evaluation criteria for each technique were not clearly defined. The reliability of the evaluation system for breaking at the 2024 Olympics has not yet been analysed in the literature. This study reviews research on judging in other aesthetic sports and aims to evaluate the reliability of the scoring results for breakdancing at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Methodology: The results of the 2024 Paris Olympics were extracted from the official Olympics website. The competition was conducted in a one-on-one battle format. Using a slide bar, the judges evaluated which dancer performed better in five categories: technique, vocabulary, originality, execution, and musicality. Absolute deviations from the final score for individual judges were calculated as measures of bias for validity analysis. The reliability of the evaluation was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficients and Kendall's W. Results: This study found that the reliability of the judges' scores was equivalent to that of DanceSport and hip-hop dance competitions and was considerably lower than that of artistic gymnastics competitions. Moreover, the originality category demonstrated good reliability, while the other four categories showed poor reliability. The judges were aware of the characteristics of breakdancing, where the winner was determined by the impressions and excitement of the audience, and this may have led to more reliable scoring in the artistic rather than in the technical category. Discussion: These results will contribute to developing a more reliable evaluation system for hip-hop dance competitions.
Keywords: Breakdance, dance, Olympics, hip-hop, aesthetic sports, Judge, validity, Bias
Received: 13 Mar 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sato. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nahoko Sato, nsato@ngu.ac.jp
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.