ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597539
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Cognitive Era in Sports Performance: Mental Fatigue, Cognitive Training, Sleep and Psychological Ergogenic Substances-Volume IIView all 7 articles
Relationship between Training Status and Stress Response in Chinese College Student-athletes: Chain Mediation between Sport Performance Strategies and Coping Styles
Provisionally accepted- Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective:This study aimed to examine the effects of training status on the stress response of Chinese college student-athletes and to verify the mediating roles of sport performance strategies and coping styles.Methods:A total of 797 Chinese college student-athletes were assessed using the Training Status Scale, Stress Response Scale, Sports Performance Strategy Scale, and Coping Style Scale.Results:(1) Significant differences were observed in training status and sport performance strategy across age, gender, and sport level (P<0.05); significant differences in stress response were found for age and sport level (P<0.05), but not for gender (P>0.05); and significant differences in coping styles were found for sport level (P<0.05), with no significant differences for gender or age (P>0.05). Male athletes had higher mean scores than female athletes in training status, stress response, and sport performance strategy, while both genders scored similarly in coping style. (2) Training status was significantly negatively correlated with stress response (r=-0.679, p < 0.001), and had a direct negative effect on stress response ( β=-0.237, t = -13.539, p < 0.001). Additionally, training status positively predicted sport performance strategy (β = 0.019, t = 10.211, p < 0.001) and coping style (β= 0.131, t = 3.495, p < 0.001); sport performance strategy significantly predicted coping style (β = -0.442, t = -5.879, p < 0.001) and stress response ( β = 0.371, t = 29.986, p < 0.001); coping style significantly and positively predicted stress response ( β = -0.055, t = -1.435, p < 0.001). (3) Sport performance strategies and coping styles played significant mediating roles between training status and stress response, accounting for 54.33% of the total effect. Specifically, the mediating effect of sport performance strategy was 10.79%, coping style was 32.37%, and the chain mediation of both was 11.18%.Training status is a significant predictor of sport performance strategies, coping styles, and stress responses among college student-athletes. Moreover, sport performance strategies and coping styles mediate the relationship between training status and stress response. These findings are valuable for enhancing training status, stress response, sport performance, and coping styles in collegiate student-athletes, and provide a theoretical foundation for intervention development.
Keywords: training status, stress response, sport performance strategies, Coping styles, Collegiate student-athletes
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gao, Xiang, Hou and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hankun Liu, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.