ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Health Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1606045
Rumination and Psychological Resilience in Chinese Civil Aviation Flight Students: The Chain Mediating Role of Proactive Coping and Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Provisionally accepted
- 1Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China
- 2School of Physical Education, China University of Mining and Technology, xuzhou, China
- 3Department of Physical Education, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: As the focus of aviation safety shifts from technology to human factors, the central role of psychological resilience in flight safety has become increasingly prominent. However, the internal mechanism of how rumination affects psychological resilience, particularly the chain mediating effect of proactive coping and generalized anxiety, has not been thoroughly explored in high-stress populations.Methods: Employing a cross-sectional design, 1,235 flight students from the Civil Aviation Flight University of China were surveyed using the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) to gather data. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and the Bootstrap method were used to test the chain mediating effect. Results: Rumination exhibited a significant negative correlation with psychological resilience (r=-0.365, P<0.01) and proactive coping (r= -0.285, P<0.01), and a positive correlation with generalized anxiety (r=0.337, P<0.01). Psychological resilience showed a positive correlation with proactive coping (r=0.727, P<0.01) and a negative correlation with generalized anxiety (r= -0.270, P<0.01). Mediation effect analysis revealed that proactive coping and generalized anxiety each played a partial mediating role between rumination and psychological resilience. The mediating effect comprised three paths: "rumination → proactive coping → psychological resilience," "rumination → generalized anxiety → psychological resilience," and "rumination → proactive coping → generalized anxiety → psychological resilience," with effect sizes of 91.22%, 7.80%, and 0.98%, respectively. Conclusion: Rumination in civil aviation flight students not only directly impairs psychological resilience but also indirectly influences it through the chain mechanism of inhibiting proactive coping and intensifying generalized anxiety.Consequently, it is recommended that civil aviation psychological training focus on cognitive-behavioral interventions to interrupt the activation of rumination, foster adaptive coping strategies, and construct a psychological resilience development model tailored to the specific demands of the aviation profession.
Keywords: rumination, psychological resilience, generalized anxiety disorder, Proactive coping, Chain mediating effect
Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liao, Wang, Liu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mingyu Liao, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.