ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Aging
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1606683
Laughter as ideological symptom: Dialogical analysis of older adults' discourse
Provisionally accepted- 1Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 2University of the Andes, Chile, Las Condes, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper examines how laughter functions as an ideological symptom in the discourse of older adults regarding aging. The analysis is based on four group interviews conducted in Chile with participants aged 60 and above. Drawing from Voloshinov's dialogical theory, we conceptualize laughter not merely as an emotional response, but as an ideological symptom revealing tensions between what is said and what remains assumed. Using a three-phase qualitative methodology—including thematic, dialogical, and comparative approaches—we show that laughter functions as an embodied enthymeme, marking moments where personal experiences meet societal expectations and difficult truths emerge obliquely. Our findings indicate that laughter serves multiple functions. It helps navigate sensitive topics like mortality and dependency, marks boundaries between acceptance and resistance of aging stereotypes, and reveals shared but unspoken understandings about 'appropriate' aging. These patterns varied across gender and socioeconomic dimensions, with different groups employing humor to navigate distinct ideological tensions. By approaching laughter as a site where affect and ideology converge, this study offers contributions to aging studies and critical discourse analysis, offering insights into how social values about aging are embodied and negotiated through seemingly peripheral communicative acts.
Keywords: Aging discourse, Laughter, Dialogical theory, Ideological positioning, Embodied enthymeme, discourse analysis, older adults
Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Haye and Torres-Sahli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Andres Haye, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.