ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Organizational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607061
Comparative Differences in Job Preferences Among Doctors in different levels of Public Hospitals in Henan, China: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Provisionally accepted- 1Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
- 2Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
- 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
- 4Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Doctor turnover is a significant challenge faced by hospitals worldwide, particularly in public hospitals in China. By understanding how job attributes influence job preferences among doctors, effective and targeted policies can be designed to attract doctors to key positions or organizations, providing insights for evidence-based workforce interventions. Objectives: The aim of our study is to examine the difference of job preferences of doctors in different hospitals levels using DCE. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was applied in the public hospital in China. A total of 920 eligible doctors from primary, secondary, and tertiary public hospital in China participated in this study. A mixed logit model was applied to assess job preferences among doctors in public hospital in China. Results: Doctors in primary hospitals preferred job offers with 30% salary increase over the unchanged(OR=8.906, p<0.001). Similar trends were observed in secondary and tertiary hospitals (OR=4.785, p<0.001; OR=5.56, p<0.001). Doctors from all hospital levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary) preferred sufficient opportunities of professional development (OR=1.43, p=0.032; OR=1.47, p=0.008; OR=1.44, p<0.001). A 20% increase in workload was generally less favored in all hospital levels (OR=0.63, p=0.015; OR=0.45, p<0.001; OR=0.42, p<0.001). Environmental support was only preferred in tertiary hospitals (OR=1.46, p<0.001).Monthly salary was the top priority for doctors across all hospital levels, followed by work atmosphere. Employee care came third in primary and secondary hospitals, while opportunities of professional development ranked the third in tertiary hospitals. Environmental support from hospital was the least prioritized factor in both secondary hospitals, while workload was the least important in primary and tertiary hospitals. Conclusions: Doctors preferred job offers with salary increases across all hospital levels. Professional development opportunities were prioritized universally, while 20% increase in workload was generally least favored. Environmental support was most important in tertiary hospitals. Monthly salary and work atmosphere were top priorities across all hospital levels, with employee care ranking third in primary and secondary hospitals. Workload and environmental support were the least prioritized, varying by hospital level.
Keywords: Job posting, Job choices, job preference, doctors, Healthcare workers
Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Lv, QIN, Ren and Mohd Shariff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wenjie Ren, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.