SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1608508

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the Impact of Music Interventions on Brain Function, Behavior, and HealthView all 4 articles

Impact of Music-based interventions on Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Listening, Training, and Therapy in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations

Provisionally accepted
Jie  ZhangJie Zhang1,2Lu  YananLu Yanan3Katayoun  MehdinezhadnouriKatayoun Mehdinezhadnouri1*Junjie  LiuJunjie Liu2Haohui  LuHaohui Lu1
  • 1UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
  • 3Department of Music, Faculty of Human Ecology, Putra Malaysia University, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the impacts of three types of Music-based interventions (MBIs)—music listening, music training, and music therapy on the subjective well-being (SWB) of clinical and non-clinical populations. The study conducted a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus (from inception to January 2025) using the PRISMA guidelines, and selected 10 studies with a total of 387 and 326 experimental and control groups, respectively. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. A random-effects meta-analysis was then performed in Stata 18.0 to compute standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled effect sizes indicated that MBIs were significantly associated with higher levels of SWB compared with control conditions (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.06–0.65, p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses revealed significant variations across intervention types and populations.Music listening was significantly associated with higher SWB in clinical groups (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.02–1.29); however, no significant association was found in nonclinical groups (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: −0.14–0.70), although a positive overall association was observed (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.06–0.77).Music training showed a significant positive association with SWB in clinical groups (SMD = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.04–2.48), but no significant association was found in nonclinical groups (SMD = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.84–0.20) or in the overall sample (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI: −0.77–0.78). The results indicated that MBIs may improve SWB, though the strength of the association appears to vary depending on the type of intervention and the characteristics of the target population. Music training yielded the most significant effects in clinical populations, whereas music therapy was most effective in nonclinical populations. The effects of music training and music listening were less pronounced potentially due to differences in emotional needs, interactivity, and training difficulty. Future research should focus on individualized designs for intervention and further investigate the influence of factors such as type of intervention, duration, frequency, characteristics of participants, and reinforcement of interventions on the long-term effects on SWB.

Keywords: music-based interventions, Subjective well-being, Music listening, music training, Music Therapy

Received: 10 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Yanan, Mehdinezhadnouri, Liu and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Katayoun Mehdinezhadnouri, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.