ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Health Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1610027
This article is part of the Research TopicImplementing Mental Health Prevention and Promotion Programs: A Sustainable Approach - Volume IIView all 21 articles
Separate and cumulative effect of risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation among Chinese infertile couples: A cross-sectional study
Provisionally accepted- 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 2Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: This study was designed to explore separate and cumulative effects of fertility-related pressure, anxiety, depression, resilience and marital quality on suicidal ideation in Chinese infertile couples. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among infertile couples at the reproductive medicine center. Suicidal ideation was evaluated using item 9 of PHQ-9. A score of 1 or above indicated the presence of suicidal ideation. The Fertility Problem Inventory, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-8, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Quality of Marriage Index were used to measure the risk and protective factors. Risk factor index is used to represent the number of risk factors, and protective factor index is used to represent the number of protective factors. Results: A total of 674 infertile couples participated this study. 65 infertile men and 76 infertile women reported suicidal ideation. Univariate analysis revealed that infertility-related pressure, anxiety, depression, resilience and marital quality were associated with suicidal ideation in both genders. Binary logistic regression revealed positive associations of risk factor index with suicidal ideation in couples (males: OR=1.966, 95%CI:1.636-2.363; females:OR=2.484, 95%CI:1.992-3.098). The protective factor index was significantly associated with reduced suicidal ideation odds in females(OR=0.530, 95%CI:0.316-0.888), but no significant association was found in males (P=0.159). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that infertility-related pressure, anxiety, depression, resilience and marital quality are associated with suicidal ideation among infertile couples. Specifically, higher risk factor index is linked to increased odds of SI in both genders, with females showing a stronger association. And higher protective factor index is associated with reduced odds of SI in females, though this effect is not significant in males. Therefore, interventions targeting the reduction of infertility-related pressure, anxiety, and depression, coupled with the enhancement of resilience and marital quality, may effectively mitigate the risk of suicidal ideation in this population.
Keywords: Suicidal Ideation, infertile couples, Infertility-related pressure, Anxiety and depression, resilience, Marital quality, Cumulative effects
Received: 11 Apr 2025; Accepted: 01 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Li, Liu, Song, Yuan, Deng and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaoling Deng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
Xuekun Zhang, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.