ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613290
Assessing Executive Functioning in Higher Education: Development and Structural Validation of the EFEES Scale
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico
- 2Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores campus Juriquilla, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico
- 3Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
- 4Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas, Sociales e Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
- 5Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico
- 6Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico
- 7Departamento de Sociología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- 8Departamento de Ciencias del Comportamiento, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
- 9Facultad de Psicología, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
- 10Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Mexico
- 11Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán3, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Executive functions are essential cognitive processes that support goal-directed behavior, self-regulation, and academic performance in higher education. However, few assessment tools provide psychometrically validated and contextually appropriate measures for university populations. This study presents the development and structural validation of the Executive Functions Scale in Higher Education (EFEES), a self-report instrument designed to evaluate university students’ self-perceived executive functioning. The scale was developed through a theory-driven approach that defined ten core dimensions, validated behavioral indicators with expert input, and generated positively framed items tailored to the academic context. A total of 1,538 undergraduate students from twelve Mexican universities (M = 20.6, SD = 1.69) completed the instrument. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure—organization, self-control, attentional and inhibitory control, and planning and time management—accounting for 38% of the variance. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency across factors (Cronbach’s α = .84–.97; McDonald’s ω = .84–.99). Findings confirm the structural validity and reliability of the EFEES and highlight its utility in identifying executive-function profiles associated with students’ cognitive and academic development. Although initially validated in a Mexican sample, the EFEES was conceptually designed for cross-cultural applicability and can be adapted to diverse higher education contexts. The scale offers a theoretically grounded, psychometrically sound, and practically relevant tool for research and educational interventions aimed at supporting student success.
Keywords: executive functions, higher education, university students, scale development, Psychometric validation
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zamora Lugo, Reynoso-Alcántara, Sanchez-Lopez, Vergara-Lope, Ocampo-Gómez, García-Gomar, Torres González, Avecilla-Ramírez, Carbajal-Valenzuela, Calderón, Vázquez-Moreno, Flores-Gonzáles, Contreras-Ibáñez, Montero-Domínguez, Mejía-Castillo, Abundis-Gutierrez, Sánchez-Cid, Osorio-Guzmán, García- Aguilar, Negrete-Cortes, Cisneros Báez, Martell Ruiz, Campos Romero and Cuevas- Ferrera. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Vicenta Reynoso-Alcántara, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.