Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol., 08 August 2025

Sec. Organizational Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615144

Inclusive leadership and employee job performance: mediation of leader-member exchange and organizational identification


Shengnan Wang,Shengnan Wang1,2Kai Feng,
Kai Feng1,2*Hongyan WangHongyan Wang2Yongxin Li
Yongxin Li2*
  • 1Psychological Health Education Centre, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2Institute of Psychology and Behaviour, Henan University, Kaifeng, China

Background: Previous studies indicated that inclusive leadership is related to a series of positive working outcomes, but the internal acting mechanism remains unclear. This study used a three-month longitudinal design to investigate the acting mechanism of inclusive leadership on individual job performance by introducing leader-member exchange and organizational identification as mediators.

Methods: The data were collected through self-reported questionnaires and a leader-rated survey of 206 employees of a car battery manufacturer in central China.

Results: The results revealed that inclusive leadership is positively associated with job performance, leader-member exchange, and organizational identification. A hierarchical regression and bootstrap analysis indicated that organizational identification and leader-member exchange significantly mediated the relationship between inclusive leadership and job performance, and the structural equation model supported the results.

Conclusions: The findings provide significant lessons for how organizations can gain a competitive advantage in terms of employee performance by fostering inclusive leadership, leader-member exchange, and organizational identification.

1 Introduction

The concept of inclusive leadership emerged along with the integration of the world economy and diversification of labor. This leadership style has been regarded as a set of behaviors by which leaders express openness, accessibility, and availability (Carmeli et al., 2010; Hirak et al., 2012; Mitchell et al., 2015) as well as respond to followers' needs for belongingness and uniqueness (Barak, 1999; Shore et al., 2011) during their interactions with employees, so as to enhance the followers' sense of responsibility to the organization and to make them feel esteemed and valued within the work group. Over the last decade, scholars have made good progress in discovering the fundamental ideas of inclusive leadership. Previous studies illustrated that inclusive leadership is not only bound to a series of positive outcomes in the workplace, such as job performance (Mitchell et al., 2015), employee work engagement (Choi et al., 2015), job satisfaction (Brimhall et al., 2014), employee wellbeing (Choi et al., 2017), and organizational justice (Sheehan and Anderson, 2015), but also facilitates positive work-related behaviors such as innovation by employees (Javed et al., 2018a,b, 2017). However, there are still gaps in our understanding of the mediating mechanism between inclusive leadership and its outcomes, which requires further empirical research.

Since the concept of inclusive leadership was introduced in China, it has received plenty of interest from numerous researchers (Gao, 2010; Ma et al., 2015; Tang and Zhang, 2015). Initially, research has mostly remained at the level of theoretical discussions (Ma et al., 2015) and reviews (Tang and Zhang, 2015), while recently there has increased number of empirical studies (Ma et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2018; Zhong et al., 2019). Since the concept of inclusive leadership was introduced in China, it has received plenty of interest from numerous researchers (Gao, 2010; Ma et al., 2015; Tang and Zhang, 2015). Initially, research has mostly remained at the level of theoretical discussions (Ma et al., 2015) and reviews (Tang and Zhang, 2015), while recently there has increased number of empirical studies (Ma et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2018; Zhong et al., 2019). Recent years have witnessed a surge in empirical investigations across various Chinese organizational contexts, including healthcare (Zhang et al., 2022; Ahmed et al., 2021), education (Li and Zhou, 2023; Liu and Wu, 2023), and hospitality sectors (Lv et al., 2022; Shen et al., 2025), demonstrating the growing practical importance of inclusive leadership in Chinese organizations. However, since inclusive leadership is highly consistent with Chinese traditional culture and the inclusive perspective of development (Tang and Zhang, 2015), and Chinese organizations are increasingly involved in globalization, leaders are challenged by an increasingly diversified workforce. Therefore, more empirical research on inclusive leadership and its acting mechanism on outcomes is needed to improve leaders' efficiency and effectiveness as well as organizational competitiveness.

This study is theoretically grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory, which posits that individuals are motivated to acquire, protect, and maintain resources (Hobfoll and Shirom, 2001). When resources are lost or threatened, individuals experience stress and take action to restore resource balance. As a relational leadership style, inclusive leadership serves as a resource provider, helping employees accumulate psychological resources through social support, emotional connection, and development opportunities. COR theory explains why inclusive leadership operates through specific mediating mechanisms. High-quality Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) relationships represent increased leader support and resource allocation to employees, while organizational identification reflects employees' emotional belonging and psychological attachment to the organization. Both mechanisms strengthen employees' resource reserves, which COR theory suggests will be translated into improved work performance over time. Furthermore, COR theory emphasizes that resource accumulation is a dynamic process requiring time to develop, which supports our longitudinal research design spanning 3 months.

High-quality Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) relationships signify greater leader support and resource allocation to employees, while organizational identification (OI) reflects employee emotional belonging to the organization. Both mechanisms strengthen employee resource reserves, which are then translated into work performance (Katsaros, 2024). Furthermore, COR theory emphasizes the dynamic nature of resource accumulation, asserting that time is required for resources to develop (Halbesleben et al., 2014). The psychological impact of inclusive leadership on employees takes time to manifest as behavioral outcomes. For instance, initiatives implemented at Time 1 (e.g., trust-building and tolerance for mistakes) may enhance employee trust through LMX and strengthen OI at Time 2, ultimately driving performance improvements at Time 3.

This study integrates Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory with Social Exchange Theory to provide a comprehensive theoretical foundation for understanding inclusive leadership mechanisms. COR Theory (Hobfoll, 1989) explains the resource-building process through which inclusive leadership operates, while Social Exchange Theory (Blau, 1964) illuminates the relational mechanisms that translate leadership behaviors into employee outcomes. According to COR Theory, individuals strive to obtain, retain, and protect resources, and the accumulation of resources leads to positive outcomes. Inclusive leadership behaviors—openness, accessibility, and availability—function as resource investments that provide employees with psychological resources including social support, recognition, and development opportunities. These resources accumulate over time and are subsequently invested in improved job performance. Social Exchange Theory complements this resource perspective by explaining how the quality of leader-member relationships influences the resource exchange process. When leaders demonstrate inclusive behaviors, they signal their investment in the relationship, prompting employees to reciprocate through enhanced effort and commitment. This theoretical integration explains why inclusive leadership operates through both relationship quality (LMX) and organizational attachment (organizational identification) pathways. The temporal aspect of resource accumulation emphasized in COR Theory supports our longitudinal design, as the theory suggests that resource gains require time to translate into behavioral outcomes. Furthermore, these theoretical mechanisms are particularly relevant in Chinese cultural contexts, where relationship-based interactions and collective identity formation are fundamental to workplace dynamics.

Therefore, this study focused on LMX and OI as possible mediators. It explored whether and what kind of relationship exists between inclusive leadership and job performance, using a longitudinal study of 206 employees of a battery manufacturer over 3 months. The conceptual model is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the relationship between inclusive leadership and job performance. Inclusive leadership at Time1 influences leader-member exchange and organizational identification at Time2. Leader-member exchange influences job performance, as does organizational identification. Hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 represent these relationships, with job performance measured at Time1, Time2, plus Time3.

Figure 1. The hypothesized model.

2 Theory and hypotheses

2.1 Inclusive leadership and employee job performance

Inclusive leadership has been regarded as a mode of relational leadership in which the focus is on leaders listening and paying attention to followers' needs and followers perceiving that leaders are available to them (Hollander, 2012). Inclusive leaders respect employees, treat them fairly, and show tolerance and patience around employee failures. This fosters increasing employee loyalty toward the organization as well as good relationships between employees, which ultimately benefits the organization due to employee improved job performance (Boehm et al., 2014). Empirical studies have confirmed a positive relationship between inclusive leadership with some outcomes. For example, inclusive leadership could positively predict employee engagement and is correlated with employee cognition of psychological safety (Carmeli et al., 2010; Javed et al., 2017). It also has a positive influence on productivity, employee innovative work behavior (Javed et al., 2018a,b), learning from errors (Ye et al., 2018), work engagement (Choi et al., 2015), and retention rate (Ma et al., 2014).

In China, in a study of college teachers, Fang and Jin (2014) found that the leader's inclusion of employees significantly affected their team performance. Cheng (2014) reported a positive correlation between inclusive leadership and psychological ownership and team cohesiveness, as well as negative correlations with turnover intention, counterproductive behavior, and cynicism. Ma et al. (2019) conducted an empirical study on medical teams and confirmed the positive impact of inclusive leadership on team performance. However, most previous studies are based on self-reported measurements of performance variables (Fang and Jin, 2014; Ma et al., 2019). In this study, other-rated data on job performance were collected to further investigate inclusive leadership and generate a comprehensive understanding of the concept. We hypothesize the following:

Hypothesis 1. Inclusive leadership is positively related to job performance.

2.2 Mediating effects of leader-member exchange

The LMX theory developed by Graen and Uhl-Bien (1995) explains how leaders treat subordinates distinctively. It posits that the degree of affinity between leaders and their subordinates is an important variable affecting performance. According to Liden and Maslyn (1998), LMX consists of four conditions: loyalty, affect, contribution, and specialized admiration. This characterizes high-quality and low-quality “leader-member” relationships in terms of social support, communication, individual contribution, and materials constraints. In a high-quality leader-member relationship, employees experience a high level of support and trust from their immediate leader and consequently enjoy a familiar relationship with the leader (Wayne et al., 1997).

Inclusive leadership is a type of relational leadership (Hollander, 2012), that inevitably involves the leader-member relationship. This relational aspect is particularly significant in Chinese organizational contexts, where guanxi (relationship networks) and high-quality interpersonal connections are culturally valued. Recent studies have consistently demonstrated the critical role of leader-member relationships in Chinese organizations across various sectors (Xie et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024; Cheng et al., 2024). The inclusiveness of leaders is always reflected in their interaction with subordinates. Javed et al. (2018a) argued that inclusive leadership facilitates a relationship of social interaction between leaders and followers in which both parties trust and support each other as a team and both enjoy a high-quality relationship of open communication, confidence, consideration, maturity, and effective interaction (Maslyn and Uhl-Bien, 2001; Sullivan et al., 2003). This is based on the social exchange theory that individuals interact and maintain relationships with others in the expectation of outcomes and returns (Blau, 1968; Homans, 1958). As a high degree of inclusive leadership may give employees a good perception of LMX (Hollander, 2012), when LMX is high, the level of social exchange will be high, which will subsequently enhance the trust and esteem between leaders and subordinates; this, in turn, may accelerate effective interactions within the group and motivate the members to accomplish additional achievements. On the contrary, when LMX is low, the leader can only expect normal job performance from subordinates by exercising their official authority and distributing standard benefits. Studies have shown that high-quality LMX could enhance employee sense of responsibility (Langfred and Moye, 2004) and thus improve their job performance (Kalbers and Cenker, 2008). Early studies verified that LMX was significantly correlated with superiors' evaluation of subordinates' performance (Gerstner and Day, 1997), as well as the job performance of group members. Employee performance in cases of high-quality LMX was 20% better than in low-quality LMX cases (Mayfield and Mayfield, 1998).

As inclusive leadership focuses on the relationship between leaders and members, while LMX can effectively predict individual job performance, LMX may play a mediating role between inclusive leadership and employee job outcomes. Javed et al. (2018b), through a study of small Pakistani textile companies, showed that inclusive leadership promoted innovative work behaviors via the mediation of LMX. Recent Chinese research has provided substantial evidence for LMX mediation mechanisms. Xie et al. (2023) found that leader-member exchange played a crucial role in mitigating work-related stress among Chinese nurses, demonstrating the importance of high-quality leader-member relationships in Chinese healthcare contexts. Similarly, Cheng et al. (2024) confirmed that leader-member exchange was significantly associated with nurses' innovative behaviors in Chinese hospitals, indicating that LMX quality is fundamental to positive outcomes in Chinese organizational settings. Furthermore, Wang et al. (2024) demonstrated that leader-member exchange moderated the relationship between leadership and psychological safety in Chinese contexts, while Arshad et al. (2024) found that LMX effectiveness was particularly pronounced in Chinese organizational environments compared to other cultural contexts. These recent findings support the critical role of LMX in Chinese organizations and justify our focus on this mediating mechanism. Hence, combining with Hypothesis 1, we hypothesize the following:

Hypothesis 2. LMX mediates the relationship between inclusive leadership and job performance.

2.3 Mediating effects of organizational identification

The concept of OI originated from social identity theory (Tajfel, 1972), which refers to the consistency of members' behaviors and concept with the organization they belong to (Mael and Ashforth, 1992). The members agree that they have rational contracts with and responsibilities to the organization as well as an irrational sense of belongingness and dependence. The behavioral results of their dedication to organizational activities are dominant on this psychological basis (Jian et al., 2017). These characteristics of the concept could be used as a mediator between organizational goals and organizational activities; that is, OI has an impact on organizational operation activities and thus might advance the achievement of organizational goals.

In order to improve employee perception of OI in organizational practices, scholars have made good progress in the study of the relationships between OI and its antecedents. The empirical evidence demonstrates that a series of organizational variables are associated with employee perception of OI, such as organizational culture, organizational competition, organizational support, organizational justice, and organizational communication (Li, 2011, p. 24–28). As leaders usually occupy vital positions in organizations, and to a large extent determine the organizational activities and development (Kim and Yukl, 1998), being the substitutes for and representatives of organizations, the individual's perception of the organization is largely influenced by interaction with the leader. Studies have shown that a series of different leadership styles, such as transformational leadership and transactional leadership (Epitropaki and Martin, 2004; Wang et al., 2013), spiritual leadership and authentic leadership (Wang et al., 2013), and paternalistic leadership (Wu et al., 2018) have predictive effects on individual OI.

Differing from traditional leadership theories, inclusive leadership places the emphasis on employee perception of whether they have been accepted and respected by their colleagues through the experience of whether their psychological demands have been satisfied (Shore et al., 2011). This emphasis on acceptance and belonging is particularly resonant in Chinese collectivistic culture, where group harmony and organizational identification are highly valued (Liu et al., 2021; Lv et al., 2022). This would subsequently lead to employee acceptance of, recognition of, and identification with the organization (Randel et al., 2018). Despite this, as inclusive leadership and OI share the same theoretical origin—the social identity theory—inclusive leaders may promote employee OI by influencing their acceptance of organizational goals and constructing a favorable working environment. By nature, inclusive leaders are accessible and listen to their followers, which may expedite employee sharing of the goals and values of the organization. Tang et al. (2018) proved that inclusive leadership could reinforce employee wellbeing via the mediating role of employee goal acceptance. Besides, the inclusive leaders' availability and openness help establish an effective communication atmosphere and cooperative work climate, which has been reported to positively predict employee OI (Mael and Ashforth, 1992).

Considering the conception of inclusive leadership, it could be expected to facilitate an improvement in individual OI. Previous studies have provided huge amounts of evidence for OI having a positive relationship with a series of attitudinal and behavioral outcome variables, such as intention to resign, affective commitment, work involvement, and organizational citizenship behavior (see Li, 2011, p. 33–40). Thus, combining with Hypothesis 1, we hypothesize the following:

Hypothesis 3. OI mediates the relationship between inclusive leadership and job performance.

3 Materials and methods

3.1 Samples and procedures

Participants were chosen from a car battery manufacturer in Henan Province, China through convenience sampling. Before administering the survey, we explained the research purpose and the confidentiality principle to all the participants and guaranteed them the right to withdraw from the study at any time. The surveys were conducted in each department with consent from all the participants. We distributed questionnaires to 206 employees and received 176 sets of matched valid responses. Of the participants, 116 (65.9%) were male while 60 (34.1%) were female. In terms of age, 33 participants (18.75%) were 25 years old or younger, 124 (70.45%) were aged 26–35 years, and 19 (10.8%) were 36 years old or older. Eighty-two participants (46.6%) were married and 94 (53.4%) were not. As for educational level, 58 (33%) participants had college degrees or lower, while 118 (67%) participants had a bachelor's degrees or higher. Regarding tenure, 132 (75%) participants had worked there for 5 years or less, and 44 (25%) participants had worked for 6 years or more.

Data were collected via face-to-face questionnaire surveys at three time points over the 3 months. We provided an identification number to each participant and asked each of them to indicate his or her own number on the questionnaires for later matching. At Time 1, employees were asked to complete the demographic information forms and to rate their perception of their direct leaders' inclusive leadership. A month later, at Time 2, we started the second survey to measure the LMX and OI of the employees. Lastly, the performance scores of the employees, as assigned by their direct leaders, in the 3 months of Time 1, Time 2, and Time 3 were calculated. In the first two surveys, 412 questionnaires were issued and 385 were received, with a response rate of 93.4%. To match the job performance data that were collected at the three stages with the participant's identification number, some invalid questionnaires and unmatched answers were removed. The remaining 352 valid responses were finally sorted into 176 sets of questionnaires, with a response rate of 85.4%.

3.2 Measures

3.2.1 Inclusive leadership

The employee perception of inclusive leadership was measured by Carmeli et al.'s (2010) inclusive leadership scale. The scale consists of three dimensions with nine items: openness (three items, e.g., “The manager is open to hearing new ideas”), availability (four items, e.g., “The manager is available for consultation on problems”), and accessibility (two items, e.g., “The manager is accessible for discussing emerging problems”). All the items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = to a large extent) and the summation range was 9–45. Higher scores indicated that subordinates perceived more inclusiveness from their leaders. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91.

3.2.2 Leader-member exchange

The leader-member exchange scale compiled by Graen and Uhl-Bien (1995) was used to measure LMX as perceived by the employees. The scale includes seven items, such as “How well does your leader understand your work problems and needs?” and “How well does your leader recognize your potential?” All the items were scored on a 7-point Likert scale under positive direction (ranging from 1 = not at all/none to 7 = very high/fully). Higher scores indicate a higher quality of the LMX relationship. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.91.

3.2.3 Organizational identification

The organizational identification scale developed by Mael and Ashforth (1992) was selected to measure OI. There were six items (e.g., “The organization's successes are my successes”) positively scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores represent a higher level of OI. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.90.

3.2.4 Employee job performance

To evaluate the employee job performance, we adopted the self-designed performance evaluation method of the enterprise. The enterprise has a mature and advanced management system that enables it to improve constantly to make changes to meet market requirements along with its own characteristics. The job performance evaluation form used in this study is the enterprise's current version, which has been revised several times and used for years with good results. The assessment form is marked using a centesimal system and is scored directly by the employee superiors. It has four parts—assessment of employee work attitude (20 points), collaborative ability (25 points), work execution ability (50 points), and self-improvement ability (5 points)—and each part has specific subdivisions. The final total score of each employee is converted into a performance score and then again to determine the performance coefficient. The results of the department's performance coefficient are finalized through a review by the salary performance administrators and the approval of the general manager of the integrated management department. This study used the original performance score as the basis for the evaluation of an employee's job performance. The mean of the three job performance scores over the 3 months was calculated as the indicator of the outcome variables in the present study.

3.3 Data analysis

This study employed SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 23.0 analysis software as well as deviation-correction bootstrap technology for the data analyses, which was done in four steps. First, the descriptive statistics was conducted and the Pearson correlation analysis applied to test the correlation between the variables. Second, an SPSS hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to investigate the mediating effects of LMX and OI on the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee job performance. Third, the deviation-correction bootstrap method was adopted to further examine the mediating role of LMX and OI. Finally, AMOS 23.0 was used to verify the hypothesis model with an unbiased estimation method.

4 Results

4.1 Descriptions and correlations

Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the study participants. The sample consisted of 176 employees from a car battery manufacturer, with males comprising the majority (65.9%). Most participants were in the 26–35 age range (70.4%), slightly more were unmarried (53.4%), and the majority held bachelor's degrees or higher (67.0%). In terms of organizational tenure, three-quarters of participants (75.0%) had worked at the organization for 5 years or less.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 176).

Table 2 presents the descriptive statistics and correlations among the main study variables: inclusive leadership, LMX, organizational identification, and job performance. The mean score for inclusive leadership was 3.81 (SD = 0.69), which was notably higher than the theoretical midpoint of 3.0 on the 5-point Likert scale, indicating that employees generally perceived their leaders as inclusive. Similarly, the mean scores for LMX (M = 4.44, SD = 0.92) and organizational identification (M = 3.74, SD = 0.76) were both above their respective theoretical midpoints.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Correlations among study variables.

Correlation analyses revealed significant positive relationships among all main variables. Inclusive leadership demonstrated a strong positive correlation with job performance (r = 0.487, p < 0.01), providing initial support for Hypothesis 1. LMX showed the strongest correlation with job performance (r = 0.550, p < 0.01), while organizational identification also exhibited a substantial positive relationship with job performance (r = 0.474, p < 0.01). These correlation patterns provide preliminary evidence for the proposed mediation relationships.

Regarding demographic differences in inclusive leadership perceptions, ANOVA and t-test analyses revealed that educational level was the only demographic variable that significantly influenced perceptions of inclusive leadership (F = 4.09, p = 0.008). No significant differences were found for gender (t = 0.812, p = 0.369) or age (F = 1.217, p = 0.305), suggesting that inclusive leadership perceptions were relatively consistent across these demographic categories. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 was supported by the significant positive correlation between inclusive leadership and job performance.

The measurement model—which allowed every item to load on its respective construct—was compared with two nested models. The results of the confirmatory factor analyses are given in Table 3.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Measurement model.

As shown, the three-factor measurement model (inclusive leadership, organizational identity, and LMX) had a better fit than the other models. Combined with inclusive leadership and LMX, or by setting all item loadings on one factor, the model did not fit well. This indicated that the construct validity was acceptable. Even though inclusive leadership, organizational identity, and LMX were correlated with each other, these variables need to be analyzed separately.

4.2 Hierarchical regression analysis

Initially, Table 4 revealed the results of the mediating roles of LMX and OI in the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee performance that were analyzed by applying the SPSS hierarchical regression technique. First, we entered the control variables of gender, age, marital status, educational level, and tenure; second, we input the independent variable of inclusive leadership; third, we entered LMX and OI. As shown in Table 4, the impact of inclusive leadership on job performance (β = 0.49, p < 0.001) was significant at the level of 0.01. However, after we entered LMX, it decreased from 0.49 to 0.14 (not significant), which implied there was a complete mediation between inclusive leadership and job performance (for more details see Figure 2). While, after entering OI, the impact decreased to 0.270, but was still significant at a level of 0.01, which illustrated there was a partial mediating effect in the relationship between inclusive leadership and job performance (for more details see Figure 3). Therefore, Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3 were preliminarily confirmed.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Results of hierarchical regression analysis of study variables.

Figure 2
Flowchart showing the relationship between inclusive leadership, leader-member exchange, and job performance over time. Arrows indicate influences: inclusive leadership affects leader-member exchange with a coefficient of 0.785 and job performance with 0.487. Leader-member exchange further impacts job performance with a coefficient of 0.435. Time variables are noted.

Figure 2. The mediation model of leader-member exchange. ***p < 0.001.

Figure 3
Diagram showing the relationship between inclusive leadership, organizational identification, and job performance. Inclusive leadership at Time 1 influences organizational identification at Time 2 with a value of 0.674. Organizational identification affects job performance at Time 3 with a value of 0.305. Inclusive leadership directly impacts job performance with a value of 0.487, cumulatively affecting job performance with a value of 0.270.

Figure 3. The mediation model of organizational identification. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Then, a bootstrapping analysis with 5,000 iterations was adopted to further investigate the respective roles played by LMX and OI in the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee performance. As expected, the results provided robust evidence to support the mediators (Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3). In detail, the 90% bias-corrected confidence interval for the indirect effect of LMX excluded zero [CI = (0.161, 0.597)], which indicated that the mediating effect of LMX was significant, and the mediated effect was 0.379. Likewise, the 90% bias-corrected confidence interval for the indirect effect of OI did not include zero either [CI = (0.036, 0.463)], which supported the significant mediati effect of OI, and the mediated effect was 0.250. A further test examined the discrepancies between the two mediators, while the result demonstrated that the differences were not significant (T = −0.504, p = 0.614).

4.3 Structural equation model

The results from the SPSS hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that LMX and OI both mediated the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee job performance. After that, we used AMOS 23.0 to further test the hypothesized model with an unbiased estimation method. Inclusive leadership took its three dimensions as explicit variables, LMX and OI were cross-packaged according to the load of their items, which were two explicit variables, and its four dimensions as explicit variables verified job performance. The results are shown in Figure 4. Afterwards, when the direct impact of inclusive leadership on job performance was added, the path coefficient was β = −0.023, p = 0.949, which was not significant. The fitting indices of the full mediation model and the partial mediation model are shown in Table 5, which proved the full intermediary role of LMX and OI between inclusive leadership and employee job performance. Hence, Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 3 were supported.

Figure 4
Structural equation model illustrating relationships between variables. Key variables include Inclusive Leadership (IL), Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), Organizational Identification (OI), and Job Performance (JP). IL connects to Openness, Accessibility, and Availability. JP connects to Work Attitude, Collaboration Ability, Work Executive Ability, and Self-Improvement Ability. Correlation coefficients are displayed along pathways. Abbreviations: EL (Educational Level), IL (Inclusive Leadership), Op (Openness), Acc (Accessibility), Ava (Availability), OI (Organizational Identification), LMX (Leader-Member Exchange), JP (Job Performance), WA (Work Attitude), CA (Collaboration Ability), WEA (Work Executive Ability), SIA (Self-Improvement Ability).

Figure 4. An intermediary model of inclusive leadership influencing employee performance.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Results of structural equation model (N = 176).

5 Discussion

This three-month longitudinal study examined the mechanisms through which inclusive leadership influences job performance in a Chinese manufacturing context. Our findings provide strong empirical support for a dual mediation model in which both leader-member exchange (LMX) and organizational identification (OI) serve as significant mediators. The results demonstrate that inclusive leadership operates through both relational (LMX) and identificational (OI) pathways, consistent with our integrated theoretical framework combining COR Theory and Social Exchange Theory. The LMX pathway reflects the resource exchange process predicted by Social Exchange Theory, while the organizational identification pathway represents the resource accumulation process described by COR Theory.

In this study, we investigated the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee job performance, examining LMX and OI as mediating variables. Our findings contribute to the growing body of recent Chinese research on inclusive leadership (Li and Zhou, 2023; Liu and Wu, 2023; Wu and Li, 2023; Man and Fan, 2025) while extending this research into the manufacturing sector with a longitudinal design. Valid data were collected from 176 employees of a car battery manufacturer in central China via a three-stage longitudinal research design. The study results proved the mediating effects of LMX and OI on the impact of inclusive leadership on employee job performance.

The mediating mechanisms identified in our study—LMX and organizational identification—are particularly meaningful when examined within China's distinctive cultural framework. Chinese culture, characterized by high collectivism, power distance, and relationship orientation (Hofstede, 2001), creates unique conditions that amplify the effectiveness of inclusive leadership through these specific pathways. The dual mediation model revealed in our study reflects fundamental aspects of Chinese workplace dynamics. In Chinese organizations, employee performance is not merely a function of individual capabilities or task requirements, but is deeply embedded in social relationships (guanxi) and collective identity formation. Our findings demonstrate that inclusive leadership operates through these culturally salient mechanisms to enhance performance outcomes.

As shown by the descriptive and correlative analysis, inclusive leadership demonstrates non-significant differences in the selected demographic variables, except for educational background. The results differ from previous studies that claimed that factors such as age, gender, and education level could predict differences in individual inclusive perception (Sessler Bernstein and Bilimoria, 2013; Cho and Mor Barak, 2008; Findler et al., 2007). For example, Mor Barak et al. (1998) found that men and white people had reported perceiving more inclusiveness from their leaders compared to other populations in a study on the electronics industry. After eliminating the group differences between subjects, the inconsistency may be attributed to the cultural differences between the East and the West, as individuals may acquire distinctive understandings of the concept of inclusive leadership in diversified working contexts. Moreover, the government's support and the development of the social economy in China empowered women having equal rights with men to be educated, employed, and promoted and that may enable them to perceive a stronger sense of being held in esteem and valued by the organization they joined. Reports by the US Census Bureau indicated that in China, the labor force participation rate of women was ~70% and ranked first in the world, and 37% of the management in organizations are women, which ranked second in Asia (Hays Asia Salary Guide, 2018). Therefore, it is understandable why there is no gender differences in employee perception of inclusive leadership in this study.

Regarding the inconsistency in age difference, due to the fact that the participants in this study are employees at a young enterprise, and the age range of the majority of middle managers and ordinary employees was from 25 to 35. The age distribution may provide an explanation of the results. However, as this phenomenon widely exists in small and medium enterprises, our results are significant and make both theoretical and practical contributions.

Lastly, employee perception of inclusive leadership is significantly different depending on their level of education, which is in accordance with the reality of the actual management activities of enterprises. Due to a fiercely competitive and turbulent environment, the higher qualified and skilled employees play an increasingly essential role in the enterprise. As their attributes are part of the core competitiveness of an organization, these talents are bound to be valued and used repetitively. Generally, they have better opportunities to become in-group members and to have closer relationships with the leaders. With the enhancement of the relationship, the perceived degree of inclusive leadership will be improved automatically. However, employees with a lower educational background are mostly at the grassroots level of the enterprise, which is why managers pay comparatively little attention to them. Furthermore, their communication with leaders is mostly focused on work tasks, which may result in them perceiving a lower level of inclusiveness from the leaders.

Moreover, the study results enrich the empirical evidence on the predictive impacts of inclusive leadership on employee job performance. This study demonstrates that inclusive leadership can not only predict employee innovation ability (Carmeli et al., 2010), work engagement (Choi et al., 2015), and other specific performance variables, but also have influences on the employee overall job performance in both direct and indirect ways. While job performance is one facet of organizational management outcomes, it reflects the effects of inclusive leadership on organizational performance to some extent. Studies on the measures that leaders could take to encourage employees to voluntarily put in extra work effort is crucial, as employee performance is an indispensable factor that enables organizations to maintain their advantage and competitiveness, cope with emerging challenges, meet market demands, or even cause industrial revolutions (Carmeli et al., 2010).

While our study focuses on manufacturing context, recent research provides evidence for the generalizability of our findings across different industries within China. The LMX and organizational identification pathways identified in our study have been confirmed in various Chinese organizational contexts. For instance, Cheng et al. (2024) found similar LMX mediation effects in Chinese healthcare settings, while Lv et al. (2022) demonstrated organizational identification mediation in Chinese hospitality industry. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (2022) confirmed that inclusive leadership operated through similar psychological mechanisms in Chinese healthcare organizations, and Liu et al. (2023) found comparable mediation patterns among Chinese university teachers. These convergent findings across healthcare, hospitality, and education sectors suggest that our dual mediation model captures fundamental psychological processes that operate consistently across different Chinese organizational contexts. The consistency of findings across industries supports the theoretical validity of our COR-based model while acknowledging that the strength of relationships may vary depending on industry-specific characteristics such as work autonomy, supervision intensity, and team interdependence.

Meanwhile, compared with other leadership theories, inclusive leadership prioritizes openness, accessibility, availability, and responding to followers' psychological needs such as belongingness and uniqueness (Shore et al., 2011; Randel et al., 2018) as the key factors of the theory, which enhances the connotations of how to be an excellent leader. Inclusive leaders prefer to be open-minded to listen to their followers, be approachable to communicate, and accept their followers' ups and downs in work and encourage them to bounce back. This improves their followers' feeling of psychological safety (Carmeli et al., 2010) and trust (Javed et al., 2018b), and consequently makes the leader-member relationship grow closer and establishes a favorable climate in the workplace.

Moreover, the leader's inclusiveness would empower employees to perceive a comparatively high degree of work autonomy and motivate them to reach their full potential. From the perspective of fairness, inclusive leaders tend to hold employees with disparate backgrounds in equal esteem and treat them equally and equitably, providing them with fair opportunities to be promoted, particularly among diversified labor (Ryan, 2007). It is acknowledged that a happy workforce produces more, so companies will eventually earn a good reputation and increase their profits by implementing inclusive leadership.

Besides that, our study contributes to enrich the leadership literature by constructing a mediation model in which introducing LMX and OI as mediators provides an unambiguous understanding on the role of a specific form of relational leadership, i.e., inclusive leadership. We attempted to build on previous research on the role of leadership in fostering employee productivity. In the proposed model, LMX refers to the affective bond of the followers with the leader (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995), while OI refers to the degree of employee recognition of organization and leadership at the psychological level (Mael and Ashforth, 1992). Specifically, inclusive leaders respect employees, attach importance to their needs, and recognize their contributions. In this way, they gain their support and respect. During the interaction process, the formation of effective communication and a cooperative atmosphere within the organization is gradually developed, employee sense of belongingness is enhanced, and they regard themselves as the insiders of the work group or the organizations they belong to.

In terms of achieving organizational goals, usually employees often refrain from offering advice due to their concern about the risks associated with voicing concerns that could lead to some uncertain personal consequences, which outweigh the potential benefits to the organization (Milliken et al., 2003). Inclusive leaders empower employees with higher a degree of psychological safety and show a willingness to listen to their views and innovative ideas (Javed et al., 2018a). This is conducive to employees speaking up and advancing their acceptance and recognition of the goals of the organization (Detert and Burris, 2007; Detert and Treviño, 2010). Regarding the process of goal setting, employees with high LMX and OI are likely to regard organizational goals as their personal goals, and therefore are likely to be diligent and enthusiastic to contribute their own efforts to organizational activities. Such a high degree of LMX and OI can not only stimulate employee intrinsic work motivation and drive them to work hard for organizational goals, but also facilitate employee engagement and high-quality self-management, and thus induce a substantial improvement in their job performance (Choi et al., 2015).

The parallel mediation of both LMX and organizational identification reveals a culturally grounded dual-pathway mechanism that is particularly relevant in Chinese organizational contexts. These two mediators operate synergistically, reflecting the complementary cultural dimensions of relationship orientation (guanxi) and collective identity formation that are fundamental to Chinese workplace dynamics.

The simultaneous operation of both mediators suggests that inclusive leadership effectiveness in China requires attention to both interpersonal relationship quality and collective identity formation. This dual requirement reflects the complex nature of Chinese organizational culture, where individual-leader relationships must coexist harmoniously with collective organizational commitment. The cultural concept of “harmony in diversity” (he er bu tong) provides theoretical grounding for understanding why both mediators are necessary in Chinese contexts.

6 Implications for practice

Through empirical research on inclusive leadership, this study demonstrates the significance of inclusive leadership for organizations for reaping both tangible and intangible benefits. These findings are particularly relevant given recent developments in Chinese organizational management, where inclusive leadership has been shown to address contemporary challenges such as employee wellbeing during crises (Ahmed et al., 2021), innovation promotion in knowledge-intensive sectors (Zhang et al., 2022), and voice behavior enhancement in educational institutions (Liu and Wu, 2023). First, for organizations, it is advisable to evaluate the inclusiveness of potential leader candidates, particularly in knowledge-intensive organizations. However, to some extent, inclusive leadership is supposed to be a set of organizational behaviors, and it can cultivated and developed with targeted training. Thus, it is strongly recommended that organizations offer training programs for their employees. This would not only benefit organizations in terms of fostering excellent potential leadership talent, but also help the followers to recognize inclusiveness from their leaders.

For leaders, in terms of how to be inclusive, the initial requirements are showing respect for and trust in employees (Ryan, 2006). In practice, it is recommended that leaders show esteem for and recognize employee contributions and avoid taking their diligence and efforts at work for granted. Second, delivering productive feedback on employee performance would be beneficial for them to improve their job-related abilities. Third, being a patient listener would facilitate employee willingness to speak up and enable the leader to receive more innovative ideas.

As the results demonstrate that inclusive leadership improves employee job performance through the mediating action of LMX and OI, leaders are encouraged to increase emotional interactions with employees. For example, to bridge the affective distance between each other, the leader provides effective support when the followers are suffering from frustration at work. In addition, leaders should provide their employees with a supportive, open, and inclusive working climate to reinforce their psychological safety and motivate them to use their individual talents to reach their full potential. If the external environment is appropriate and comfortable, employees could save more energy by focusing on their job and subsequently produce more, rather than having to adjust to adapt to adverse situations.

Our findings demonstrate that inclusive leadership represents a culturally adaptive leadership approach that effectively bridges traditional Chinese values with contemporary organizational needs. The effectiveness of the LMX and organizational identification pathways reflects inclusive leadership's ability to honor traditional Chinese cultural values while addressing modern workplace challenges.

The cultural relevance of our dual mediation model is further supported by the changing nature of Chinese organizations. As Chinese companies become more diverse in terms of generation, education, and geographic background, inclusive leadership provides a culturally sensitive approach to managing this transition by honoring traditional relationship values while fostering inclusive organizational cultures.

7 Limitations and future research directions

Based on empirical research, this study used a variety of statistical methods to explore the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee job performance and its acting mechanism. However, this study still has two limitations.

The first limitation is with regards to the sample. This study adopted the principle of convenience sampling, and the respondents are employees from one private enterprise. Even though the distribution of the demographic variables of the sample is relevant to the industry, it may not able to reflect the society as a whole. For example, this study was carried out in a battery manufacturing enterprise, and therefore, male participants accounted for a large proportion of the sample. While our single-organization design limits generalizability, recent cross-industry research in China provides confidence in the broader applicability of our findings. Studies in healthcare (Cheng et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2022), hospitality (Lv et al., 2022; Siyal et al., 2023), education (Li and Zhou, 2023; Liu et al., 2023), and other service sectors have identified similar mediation mechanisms, suggesting that our theoretical model captures universal psychological processes within Chinese cultural contexts. However, industry-specific factors may influence the relative strength of the mediation pathways. Manufacturing environments with close supervision and team-based work structures may amplify LMX effects, while knowledge-intensive industries might show stronger organizational identification effects due to higher employee autonomy and professional identity considerations. Future research should examine these potential industry moderators systematically. Compared with other occupations, due to a positive correlation between inclusive leadership and educational level, knowledge workers tend to perceive more inclusiveness from their leader. In future, researchers could apply various methods to expand samples to other organizations and industries to examine our hypothetical models.

The second limitation concerns the study scales. Carmeli et al.'s (2010) scale that we used is a three-dimensional scale that contains openness, accessibility, and availability. However, because academia has not reached a unified consensus on the definition of inclusive leadership, different scholars have developed a variety of measurement questionnaires according to their own study results. Thus, these scales may not be able to reflect the overall picture of inclusive leadership. Moreover, all the questionnaires used are positive scoring questionnaires, so it is possible for the participants to guess the purpose of the measurement. Although we have adopted a longitudinal research design, which effectively avoids the impact of social desirability, it may not be able to eliminate its impact. In future studies, it is strongly suggested that a new measurement is compiled to generate a comprehensive understanding of inclusive leadership and that a combination of a questionnaire survey and an experiment is applied to enhance the credibility of the data.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Henan University Institutional Review Board approved this study. All relevant ethical safeguards have been met in relation to patient or subject protection, or animal experimentation. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

SW: Validation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Project administration. KF: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition. HW: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing. YL: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Conceptualization, Project administration, Methodology, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No. 242300420476), the general project of Humanities and Social Sciences in colleges and universities of Henan Province (2024-ZZJH-306 and 2025-ZZJH-031), and the Doctoral Research Startup Fund of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy (2022HNUAHEDF056 and 2022HNUAHEDF047).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support from our families.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ahmed, F., Zhao, F., Faraz, N. A., and Qin, Y. J. (2021). How inclusive leadership paves way for psychological wellbeing of employees during trauma and crisis: a three-wave longitudinal mediation study. J. Adv. Nurs. 77, 819–831. doi: 10.1111/jan.14637

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Arshad, H. M., Akhtar, M. W., Imran, M., Batool, I., Asrar-ul-Haq, M., and Akbar, M. (2024). Effectiveness of leader-member exchange on employee outcomes in cross-cultural environment of China-Pakistan economic corridor. Kybernetes 53, 1209–1228. doi: 10.1108/K-05-2022-0746

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barak, M. E. M. (1999). Beyond affirmative action: toward a model of diversity and organizational inclusion. Administr. Soc. Work 23, 47–68. doi: 10.1300/J147v23n03_04

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociol. Inq. 34, 193–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. Int. Encycl. Soc. Sci. 7, 452–457.

Google Scholar

Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., and Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: the impact of age-inclusive HR practices on firm-level outcomes. Pers. Psychol. 67, 667–704. doi: 10.1111/peps.12047

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brimhall, K. C., Lizano, E. L., and Barak, M. E. M. (2014). The mediating role of inclusion: a longitudinal study of the effects of leader-member exchange and diversity climate on job satisfaction and intention to leave among child welfare workers. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 40, 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Reiterpalmon, R., and Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creat. Res. J. 22, 250–260. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.504654

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, L., Wei, W., Zhang, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., and Zhu, W. (2024). The association of leader–member exchange and team–member exchange with nurses' innovative behaviours: a cross-sectional study. J. Adv. Nurs. 80, 2813–2821. doi: 10.1111/jan.16121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, W. (2014). An Empirical Study of the Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Attitudes and Behavior (Doctoral Dissertation). Central South University, Changsha, China.

Google Scholar

Cho, S., and Mor Barak, M. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: a study of organizational commitment and job performance among Korean employees. Adm. Soc. Work 32, 100–126. doi: 10.1080/03643100802293865

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., and Kang, S. W. (2017). Inclusive leadership and employee well-being: the mediating role of person-job fit. J. Happiness Stud. 18, 1877–1901. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9801-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., and Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 43, 931–943. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Detert, J. R., and Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open?. Acad. Manag. J. 50, 869–884. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Detert, J. R., and Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: how supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organiz. Sci. 21, 249–270. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0405

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Epitropaki, O., and Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:293. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.293

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, C., and Jin, H. (2014). Empirical study on impact of inclusive leadership on performance of scientific research in university. Technol. Econ. 33, 53–57.

Google Scholar

Findler, L., Wind, L. H., and Barak, M. E. M. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society: modeling the relationship between diversity, inclusion, organizational culture, and employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Adm. Soc. Work 31, 63–94. doi: 10.1300/J147v31n03_05

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, H. (2010). Tolerance leadership based on core capability of corporation. Shanghai Manag. Sci. 6, 10–13.

Google Scholar

Gerstner, C. R., and Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:827. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Graen, G. B., and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh. Quart. 6, 219–247. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., and Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Manag. 40, 1334–1364. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527130

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hays Asia Salary Guide (2018). Available online at: https://www.hays.cn/en/salary-guide/index.htm (Accessed December 12, 2018).

Google Scholar

Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., and Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: the importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. Leadersh. Quart. 23, 107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 44:513. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S. E., and Shirom, A. (2001). “Conservation of resources theory: applications to stress and management in the workplace,” in Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 2nd Edn, ed. R. T. Golembiewski (Marcel Dekker), 57–80.

Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's recent consequences: using dimension scores in theory and research. Int. J. Cross Cult. Manage. 1, 11–17. doi: 10.1177/147059580111002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hollander, E. (2012). Inclusive Leadership: The Essential Leader-Follower Relationship. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203809914

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63, 597–606. doi: 10.1086/222355

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M. A., ul Haque, A., and Rubab, U. (2018a). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: the role of psychological empowerment. J. Manag. Organiz. 2018, 1–18. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2018.50

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Javed, B., Khan, A. K., and Quratulain, S. (2018b). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: examination of LMX perspective in small capitalized textile firms. J. Psychol. 152, 594–612. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1489767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., and Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of psychological safety. J. Manag. Organiz. 23, 1–20. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2017.17

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jian, H., Xu, Y., Cao, M., and Zhao, S. (2017). Research on the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee engagement: based on an organizational identification perspective. Chin. J. Manag. 14, 1642–1630.

Google Scholar

Kalbers, L. P., and Cenker, W. J. (2008). The impact of exercised responsibility, experience, autonomy, and role ambiguity on job performance in public accounting. J. Manag. Issues 20, 327–347.

Google Scholar

Katsaros, K. K. (2024). Gen Z employee adaptive performance: the role of inclusive leadership and workplace happiness. Administr. Sci. 14:163. doi: 10.3390/admsci14080163

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H., and Yukl, G. (1998). Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors from the multiple-linkage model. Monogr. Organiz. Behav. Industr. Relat. 24, 243–260.

Google Scholar

Langfred, C. W., and Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. J. Appl. Psychol. 89, 934–945. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.934

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., and Zhou, C. (2023). The influence mechanisms of inclusive leadership on job satisfaction: Evidence from young university employees in China. PLoS ONE 18:e0287678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287678

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y. (2011). Theory and Empirical Study on Teachers' Organizational Identification. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press.

Google Scholar

Liden, R. C., and Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. J. Manag. 24, 43–72. doi: 10.1177/014920639802400105

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C., and Wu, M. (2023). A chain mediation model of inclusive leadership and voice behavior among university teachers: evidence from China. Sci. Rep. 13:22377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50018-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, F., Liu, J., and Ding, H. (2023). Employee strengths mindset and voice behavior: the roles of general self-efficacy and leader-member exchange. Sustainability 15:11706. doi: 10.3390/su151511706

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, L., and Li, C. (2021). The interactive effect of organizational identification and organizational climate on employees' taking charge behavior: a complexity perspective. Complexity 2021:7040620. doi: 10.1155/2021/7040620

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, W. Q., Shen, L. C., Tsai, C. H. K., Su, C. H. J., Kim, H. J., and Chen, M. H. (2022). Servant leadership elevates supervisor-subordinate guanxi: an investigation of psychological safety and organizational identification. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 101:103114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103114

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Cheng, W., and Zhou, M. (2014). The influence of inclusive leadership on turnover intention: mediating effect of psychological ownership and cynicism. J. Central South Univ. 20, 6–12.

Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Jiang, S., and Zhang, J. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of inclusive leadership on medical team performance: a team cognition perspective. J. Hun. Univ. 33, 78–84. doi: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbskb.2019.01.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Yu, H., Ding, M., and Cheng, W. (2015). A review of inclusive leadership. Sci. Technol. Progress Policy 32, 156–160.

Google Scholar

Mael, F., and Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13, 103–123. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130202

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Man, S., and Fan, J. (2025). Unveiling the impact of inclusive leadership on innovative behavior among female employees with two children: evidence from China. Sci. Rep. 15, 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01311-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maslyn, J. M., and Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader-member exchange and its dimensions: effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:697. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayfield, J., and Mayfield, M. (1998). Increasing worker outcomes by improving leader follower relations. J. Leader. Stud. 5, 72–81. doi: 10.1177/107179199800500108

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., and Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. J. Manag. Stud. 40, 1453–1476. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00387

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Chiang, V., and Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: how leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Hum. Resour. Manag. 54, 217–239. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21658

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., and Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 34, 82–104. doi: 10.1177/0021886398341006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., et al. (2018). Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 28, 190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryan, J. (2006). Inclusive leadership and social justice for schools. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 5, 3–17. doi: 10.1080/15700760500483995

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryan, J. (2007). Inclusive leadership: a review. J. Educ. Administr. Found. 18, 92–125.

Google Scholar

Sessler Bernstein, R., and Bilimoria, D. (2013). Diversity perspectives and minority nonprofit board member inclusion. Equal. Divers. Inclus. Int. J. 32, 636–653. doi: 10.1108/EDI-02-2012-0010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheehan, M., and Anderson, V. (2015). Talent management and organizational diversity: a call for research. Hum. Resour. Dev. Quart. 26, 349–358. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21247

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, L. C., Lv, W. Q., Tsai, C. H. K., Su, C. H. J., and Chen, M. H. (2025). Linking servant leadership to employees' organizational identification in china's hotel industry: a sequential mediation model. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tourism. 1–30. doi: 10.1080/1528008X.2025.2515122

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., and Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J. Manag. 37, 1262–1289. doi: 10.1177/0149206310385943

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Siyal, S., Liu, J., Ma, L., Kumari, K., Saeed, M., Xin, C., et al. (2023). Does inclusive leadership influence task performance of hospitality industry employees? Role of psychological empowerment and trust in leader. Heliyon 9:e15507. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sullivan, J., Bretschneider, J., and McCausland, M. P. (2003). Designing a leadership development program for nurse managers: an evidence-driven approach. J. Nurs. Administr. 33, 544–549. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200310000-00010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1972). Some developments in European social psychology. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2, 307–321. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420020307

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, C., Ma, M., and Zhao, Y. (2018). The effect of inclusive leadership on employee well-being: the mediating role of goal acceptance. Chin. J. Manag. 15, 201–208.

Google Scholar

Tang, N., and Zhang, K. (2015). Inclusive leadership: review and prospects. Chin. J. Manag. 12:932.

Google Scholar

Wang, C., Yao, J., and Gao, L. (2024). How do leaders‘ positive emotions improve employees' psychological safety in China? The moderating effect of leader-member exchange. Heliyon 10:e25481. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25481

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhu, Q., Li, Y., and Li, Y. (2013). Effects of leader behaviors on organizational identification—based on dominance analysis. Psychol. Res. 6, 71–80.

Google Scholar

Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., and Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: a social exchange perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 40, 82–111. doi: 10.2307/257021

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, G., and Li, M. (2023). Impact of inclusive leadership on employees' innovative behavior: a relational silence approach. Front. Psychol. 14:1144791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144791

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, K., Zhang, Z., and Li, Y. (2018). The effect of paternalistic leadership on the turnover intention of employees: mediated by organizational identification. Stud. Psychol. Behav. 16, 557–562.

Google Scholar

Xie, L., Jiang, W., Niyomsilp, E., Jing, J., Feng, L., Wen, Y., et al. (2023). Effect of role overload on missed nursing care in China: the role of work addiction and leader-member exchange. Nurs. Open 10, 3153–3163. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, Q., Wang, D., and Li, X. (2018). Inclusive leadership and employees' learning from errors: a moderated mediation model. Austral. J. Manag. 44, 462–481. doi: 10.1177/0312896218805796

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Li, G., Zhang, Z., and Fa, T. (2022). Chinese nurses' innovation capacity: the influence of inclusive leadership, empowering leadership and psychological empowerment. J. Nurs. Manag. 30, 1990–1999. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, X., Fu, Y., and Wang, T. (2019). Inclusive leadership, perceived insider status and employee knowledge sharing: moderating role of organizational innovation climate. R&D Manag. 31, 109–120.

Google Scholar

Keywords: inclusive leadership, job performance, leader-member exchange, organizational identification, longitudinal design

Citation: Wang S, Feng K, Wang H and Li Y (2025) Inclusive leadership and employee job performance: mediation of leader-member exchange and organizational identification. Front. Psychol. 16:1615144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615144

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 21 July 2025;
Published: 08 August 2025.

Edited by:

Yixin Hu, Shandong Normal University, China

Reviewed by:

Jinyun Duan, Soochow University, China
Xiuqing Qiao, Shandong Normal University, China
Xinyong Zhang, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Feng, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kai Feng, ZmVuZ2thaTkyM0AxMjYuY29t; Yongxin Li, bGl5b25neGluQGhlbnUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.