Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1619280

Cutaneous Sensory Symptoms and Emotional Regulation in NonClinical Healthy Students: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study

Provisionally accepted
Sachiyo  OzawaSachiyo Ozawa1*Hiromasa  YoshimotoHiromasa Yoshimoto2Hajime  TanabeHajime Tanabe3Shinsuke  KoikeShinsuke Koike2
  • 1Toyo University, Bunkyō, Tōkyō, Japan
  • 2The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tōkyō, Japan
  • 3Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In an era of increasing societal stress, greater attention must be given to the mental health and well-being of non-clinical populations. Many individuals in these groups report cutaneous sensory symptoms—such as pain, crawling sensations, and burning—linked to underlying mental stress. To investigate the relationship between these stress indicators and well-being, this study examines whether university students with higher versus lower levels of these symptoms differ in their ability to regulate emotions through distraction. Methods: Data were collected from 57 university students (mean age: 19.26 ± 1.03 years, range: 18–23 years, 22 males), including near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data from 53 participants. Students were categorized into higher (n = 21) and lower (n = 36) cutaneous symptom groups based on the mean Cutaneous9 score. In the experiment, the participants first rated their Cutaneous9 symptoms, then completed an emotion-induction task by recalling stressful interpersonal events. Next, they performed the Sustained Attention to Response Tasks (SART) as a distraction. The SART is a type of go/no-go task that includes spontaneous thought probes at pseudo-random intervals to assess attentional state or degree of off-task thoughts. Prefrontal activity during the SART was assessed using NIRS. Emotional states were assessed before induction, after induction, and after distraction using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Results: Participants with higher cutaneous symptoms struggled more with maintaining attention during SART and showed less reduction in unpleasant emotions. Only those with lower symptoms experienced a decrease in unpleasant emotions. Furthermore, participants with higher cutaneous symptoms exhibited medial prefrontal cortex activation during distraction, with no significant activation differences in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Conclusions: These findings suggest that university students with higher cutaneous symptoms face greater challenges in regulating emotions compared with those with lower symptoms. Their reduced ability to benefit from distraction may stem from difficulties in maintaining attentional focus or increased absorption in off-task thoughts, rather than impaired emotional inhibition. Addressing these challenges through targeted interventions may enhance the mental well-being and overall quality of life in non-clinical populations.

Keywords: mental stress, Emotional Distraction, mind-wandering, Task-unrelated thoughts, SustainedAttention to Response Tasks (SART), Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), medial prefrontal cortex(mPFC)

Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 04 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ozawa, Yoshimoto, Tanabe and Koike. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sachiyo Ozawa, Toyo University, Bunkyō, 112-8606, Tōkyō, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.