ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1622757

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Intersection of Psychology, Healthy Behaviors, and its OutcomesView all 111 articles

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Chinese Vitiligo Quality of Life Scale (CVQLS)

Provisionally accepted
Bo  WangBo Wang1Qi  WangQi Wang2Zeqian  WangZeqian Wang2Jia  ZhangJia Zhang2Yuqi  ZhouYuqi Zhou2Xiaoqi  ChenXiaoqi Chen2Tong  WuTong Wu2Shishi  XiongShishi Xiong2Jin  XiaodongJin Xiaodong2Shanshan  GaoShanshan Gao2Lei  ShangLei Shang3*Chunying  LiChunying Li2*Zhe  JianZhe Jian2*
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
  • 2Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
  • 3Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Current research shows that there is no vitiligo quality-of-life measurement instrument suitable for Chinese patients. At present, the DLQI scale commonly used with vitiligo patients in China includes symptom dimensions or items that are not applicable to vitiligo patients. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a qualityof-life scale specific to vitiligo patients in China.Methods: In this study, the item pool was created through a comprehensive review of relevant literature, focus group discussions, and brainstorming. Two rounds of Delphi expert consultation and a semi-structured interview were conducted to modify the item pool and form the draft scale. Two rounds of questionnaire investigations were used to select items and form the final scale. The reliability, validity, and discriminative ability were evaluated based on the third round of questionnaire investigation.The scale contains 3 dimensions and 25 items, and the total cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.54%. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.972; the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.950, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.776. The Spearman correlation coefficient with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was 0.650. The scores of the scale or each dimension were correlated with patient characteristics, including gender, disease course, disease stage, Body Surface Area (BSA), and white spot area.This study developed the Chinese Vitiligo Quality of Life Scale (CVQLS) to measure the quality of life of vitiligo patients in China. Compared to the commonly 4 used DLQI, the CVQLS removed items related to skin disease symptoms while incorporating concerns specific to Chinese patients, such as the economic burden. The scale is thus tailored to the needs of Chinese vitiligo patients. Preliminary results indicate that the CVQLS has good reliability, validity, and discriminative ability.

Keywords: Vitiligo, Quality of Life, scale development, test-retest reliability, Split-half reliability, construct validity, Criterion-related validity, Discriminative ability

Received: 04 May 2025; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Chen, Wu, Xiong, Xiaodong, Gao, Shang, Li and Jian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Lei Shang, Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
Chunying Li, Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
Zhe Jian, Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.