Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Consciousness Research

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626223

This article is part of the Research TopicMethodological Issues in Consciousness Research- Volume IIIView all articles

New Methods, Old Questions: Advancing the Study of Unconscious Perception

Provisionally accepted
  • 1National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain
  • 2Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 3Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Since the early experimental studies of the late 19th century, research on unconscious perception has been shaped by persistent methodological challenges and evolving experimental approaches aimed at demonstrating perception without awareness. In this review, we will discuss some of the most relevant challenges researchers have faced in demonstrating unconscious perception, and examine how different measures of awareness (e.g., objective vs. subjective) yield different awareness thresholds—often leading to two alternative approaches to demonstrating unconscious perception. We will further explore new methodologies in the field, such as regression-based Bayesian modeling, sensitivity vs. awareness (SvA) curves derived from General Recognition Theory (GRT), the liminal-prime paradigm, and two-interval forced choice (2IFC) designs. Finally, we emphasize the need for brain-based approaches to unconscious perception and discussed some promising studies in this area, while also highlighting the role of individual differences and alternative frameworks such as predictive coding and active inference views in future research. Overall, the new approaches and methodologies discussed here will advance the field by addressing the challenges inherent in demonstrating cognition in the absence of awareness.

Keywords: Awareness, Visual Masking, Awareness thresholds, Consciousness, Unconscious perception

Received: 10 May 2025; Accepted: 07 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jimenez, Prieto, Montoro, Hinojosa and Kiefer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mikel Jimenez, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.