Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Environmental Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1630861

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding Psychological Drivers of Food Consumption and Waste: Pathways to Sustainable ChoicesView all 4 articles

Research on the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumers' behavioral intention to refuse food waste based on behavioral reasoning theory

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Fine Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
  • 2School of Design, Jiangnan University, wuxi, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Given the escalating global concern regarding food waste, food packaging emerges as a critical area for intervention.Existing research, however, predominantly concentrates on consumer attitudes, offering limited insight into the role of food packaging in mitigating food waste. To address this gap, this study employs the BRT model, incorporating the variable of behavioral rationality into traditional theory and integrating values as a preceding variable. It integrates consumer values, behavioral rationality, attitudes, and behavioral intentions to explore the influence mechanism of food packaging on consumer behavior, explaining behavioral intentions through supporting/rejecting reasons. The study investigates how visual attributes, functionality, environmental sustainability, and social attributes within supporting reasons positively influence consumers' attitudes and behavioral intentions to reject food waste. Conversely, it investigates how information overload, functional deficiencies, inappropriate sizing, and high cognitive load within rejection reasons negatively impact these attitudes and intentions. By dissecting the positive and negative impacts of food packaging attributes on consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions across supporting and rejecting reasons, this research aims to identify key design factors for food packaging. This will fill existing research gaps, provide a theoretical foundation for food packaging design, and encourage consumers to adopt positive behaviors that reduce food waste. The findings indicate that: (1) consumer values significantly influence different behavioral attitudes; (2) supporting reasons related to food packaging positively impact the rejection of food waste behavior, while rejecting reasons have the opposite effect; (3) both positive and negative reasons significantly influence consumer attitudes and behavioral intentions, highlighting the need to optimize design elements in food packaging to positively influence consumer behavior; (4) packaging design factors have a more significant impact on intentions to conserve food than consumer attitudes themselves. This study extends the Behavioral Reasoning Theory (BRT) to understand food packaging's influence on consumer behavior, addressing contextual factors within BRT. Furthermore, it provides a scientific basis for food companies to optimize packaging design, which has practical implications for mitigating global food waste.

Keywords: sustainable consumption, Food Packaging, Food wastage, Behavioral Intention, BRT

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 01 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mu, Zhou and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Juncheng Mu, School of Fine Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.