Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Environmental Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1630999

Immediate health and well-being benefits of short-term forest therapy for urban healthcare workers: A case study in Giant Panda National Park with cultural ecosystem services (CES)

Provisionally accepted
PING  ZHANGPING ZHANG1Yixin  CuiYixin Cui2Rui  LiuRui Liu3Yifei  ZhaoYifei Zhao1Wenjun  SuWenjun Su4*Li  ZhaoLi Zhao1Xiaohua  WangXiaohua Wang4Li  DengLi Deng5Boya  WangBoya Wang1Mingze  ChenMingze Chen6Weiquan  GuoWeiquan Guo4Lilin  SongLilin Song3Qingjie  ZhangQingjie Zhang1Fuxi  XieFuxi Xie4Saixin  CaoSaixin Cao1Guangyu  WangGuangyu Wang6Tongyao  ZhangTongyao Zhang7Shihong  YangShihong Yang8Xi  LiXi Li1*
  • 1College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China
  • 2Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 3Tangjiahe Area of the Giant Panda National Park, Guangyuan, China
  • 4Sichuan Forestry Central Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • 5Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
  • 6University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • 7Whenchuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenchuan, China
  • 8Forestry and Grassland Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The increasing frequency and prominence of global public health threats put urban healthcare workers at risk of physical and mental illness. Forest therapy holds crucial importance in promoting human health. Cultural ecosystem services (CES) profoundly influence human welfare. National parks, due to rich biodiversity and other favorable conditions, can support forest therapy and provide CES. This study organized 32 urban healthcare workers to participate in a forest therapy in the Giant Panda National Park (GPNP), which provides CES, and examined immediate changes in physical and mental health. Physiological indicators include respiratory and circulatory system, immune system, neurotransmitter system, physical fitness development, and sleep quality. Psychological indicators include self-restore and preferences, sensory perception, transcendent experiences, and personal subjective well-being. The results indicate that both forest bathing and sensory therapy may yield varying degrees of relaxation and concentration. Forest therapy in medium hydrodynamic landscapes may offer significant physiological relaxation, while sensory therapy in forest environment may enhance concentration levels. Activities in pristine ecological environments may be more effective in evoking positive emotions. This finding could potentially contribute to the rehabilitation treatment of individuals with depression. Results on respiratory and circulatory systems, immune systems, neurotransmitter systems remind us that culture and nature are not in conflict. Infusing cultural elements into sufficiently good ecological environments may bring greater benefits. This finding could aid future selections of therapeutic microenvironments for sub-health populations and individuals with respiratory diseases. This study also found that the most contributing activities to mental health in different environments were not exactly the same, with Baduanjin, plant nameplates and mandalas, and meditation on positive thoughts being highly contributing to both types of environments, while the landscape of smell was more contributing in the waterside environment, and embracing trees was more contributing in the forest environment. Additionally, the mental health benefits derived from natural environments with cultural ambiance surpass those of forest bathing in purely natural settings. The exploratory results may provide scientific evidence for the comprehensive impact of national parks on human health, and to offer feasible nature-based solutions for the health and well-being of urban healthcare workers and the broader population.

Keywords: Giant panda national park, Forest therapy, CES, Health and well-being, Urban healthcare workers

Received: 20 Jun 2025; Accepted: 17 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 ZHANG, Cui, Liu, Zhao, Su, Zhao, Wang, Deng, Wang, Chen, Guo, Song, Zhang, Xie, Cao, Wang, Zhang, Yang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Wenjun Su, 18683251182@163.com
Xi Li, lixi@sicau.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.