ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1632246
Immature Defense Mechanisms and Suicide Attempts in Borderline Personality Organization: A Clinical Sample Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Graduate School of Health Sciences, Koç University, İstanbul, Türkiye
- 2Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Türkiye
- 3Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between defense mechanisms and suicide attempts in individuals with borderline personality organization (BPO), considering the high prevalence of suicide attempts in this population. Methods: A total of 80 participants (71.25% female) who met all inclusion criteria and had complete data were included in the analyses. They were recruited from the outpatient psychotherapy unit of a university hospital. All participants participated in clinical interviews and completed standardized psychometric scales, including the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI), Defense Style Questionnaire, and Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R). Participants were classified two group based on their history of suicide attempts. Statistical analyses, including group comparisons, correlation analyses, and regression models, were used to explore the relationship between defense mechanisms and suicide attempts among individuals with BPO. Results: Of the 80 participants (57 females, 23 males; mean age=26.7, SD=7.7), 23 reported at least one suicide attempt, while 57 had no suicide attempt history. Suicide attempters exhibited significantly higher scores on the BPI and immature defense mechanisms, particularly projection, acting out, and splitting (all p < .05). Correlation analyses revealed significant positive relationships between BPI and immature defense style (r=0.55, p < .001), particularly splitting (r=0.46, p < .001), projection (r=0.43, p <0.001), autistic fantasy (r=0.41, p < .001), and acting out (r=0.31, p < .001). Regression analyses were conducted using two models. The first model included age, sex, and the three defense styles (mature, neurotic, and immature) as independent variables. The second model included age, sex, and 20 individual defense mechanisms as independent variables. In the first model, immature defenses (OR=1.035, p = .014) and female sex (OR=4.968, p = .032) were significantly associated with history of suicide attempt. In the second model, the projection defense mechanism (OR=1.224, p = .006) and female sex (OR=4.071, p = .048) were significantly associated. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the importance of specific immature defense mechanisms, such as projection, and female sex, in understanding suicide attempts in individuals with BPO. Future research should investigate whether therapeutic modification of these defenses may reduce suicidality and improve outcomes.
Keywords: Borderline personality organization, Suicide, Defense mechanism, immature defense mechanism, projection, Acting Out, Splitting
Received: 20 May 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ŞAHİN, Chousein, Uludağ and Saydam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: ARDIL BAYRAM ŞAHİN, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Koç University, İstanbul, Türkiye
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.