Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1633990

The need to consider auxiliary assumptions in preregistration practices

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 2New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The importance of preregistration has gained recent traction in psychology. To reduce questionable research practices and improve the credibility of research findings, researchers preregister important details before commencing with data collection. However, current preregistration practices miss an important issue when it comes to evaluating predictions.That is because predictions depend not only on theoretical terms but also auxiliary assumptions. Auxiliary assumptions traverse the distance from nonobservational theoretical terms to observational terms at the level of the empirical hypotheses. Because the credibility of study findings depends on the appraisal of auxiliary assumptions, these assumptions should, at least, be considered in preregistration practices. In this paper we outline the need to consider auxiliary assumptions during preregistration, the benefits of doing so, and how current practices can be amended to accommodate them. If the need for researchers to preregister continues to increase and the belief is that doing so will increase the credibility of psychological research, we believe auxiliary assumptions should become part of these practices.

Keywords: auxiliary assumptions, preregistration, questionable research practices, Replication, Open Science

Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 01 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 St Quinton and Trafimow. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Tom St Quinton, t.st-quinton@leedsbeckett.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.