ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Cognitive Science
A Qualitative Focus Groups Study to Identify How Pedestrians Perceive the Arrival of Fully Autonomous Vehicles
Provisionally accepted- Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study explores pedestrian perceptions of fully autonomous vehicles and their acceptance. We organised two focus groups in which participants (7 for each) discussed, firstly, their own behaviour when crossing the road in front of a human-driven vehicle and the key factors they considered, as perceived benefits and risks of fully autonomous vehicles. Secondly, the factors that could positively influence their own acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles and their preferred interfaces and behaviours (external human-machine interface) for communicating with the fully autonomous vehicles were discussed. Participants highlighted the importance of driver-related cues, the need for clear information on fully autonomous vehicles behaviour and the way in which they will be introduced into the automotive landscape, and their preference for external human-machine interfaces that signal safe crossing. Concerning the external human-machine interfaces, the participants preferred those that projected a green pedestrian crossing onto the road to indicate that the fully autonomous vehicles would wait for the pedestrian to cross. The findings emphasize pedestrians' concerns and preferences to guide the design of future autonomous vehicles.
Keywords: Fully autonomous vehicles, Pedestrians, pedestrian safety, vulnearable road users, Vehicle design, qualitative methods, Acceptance measurement, focus group
Received: 27 May 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Schwartz and Gronier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lou Schwartz, lou.schwartz@list.lu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
